General Review of the Worldwide Tsunami Research

Cheng Sixue Liu Haijiang

Sixue Cheng, Haijiang Liu (2023). General Review of the Worldwide Tsunami Research. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 22(1): 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00315-z
Citation: Sixue Cheng, Haijiang Liu (2023). General Review of the Worldwide Tsunami Research. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 22(1): 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00315-z

General Review of the Worldwide Tsunami Research

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00315-z
Funds: 

the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 52271292

the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 52071288

the Science and Technology Innovation 2025 Major Project of Ningbo City under Grant 2022Z213

    Corresponding author:

    Haijiang Liu haijiangliu@zju.edu.cn

  • Abstract

    With the advancement of the global economy, the coastal region has become heavily developed and densely populated and suffers significant damage potential considering various natural disasters, including tsunamis, as indicated by several catastrophic tsunami disasters in the 21st century. This study reviews the up-to-date tsunami research from two different viewpoints: tsunamis caused by different generation mechanisms and tsunami research applying different research approaches. For the first issue, earthquake-induced, landslide-induced, volcano eruption-induced, and meteorological tsunamis are individually reviewed, and the characteristics of each tsunami research are specified. Regarding the second issue, tsunami research using post-tsunami field surveys, numerical simulations, and laboratory experiments are discussed individually. Research outcomes from each approach are then summarized. With the extending and deepening of the understanding of tsunamis and their inherent physical insights, highly effective and precise tsunami early warning systems and countermeasures are expected for the relevant disaster protection and mitigation efforts in the coastal region.

     

    Article Highlights
    • Characteristics of the tsunamis induced by four different mechanisms are individually specified.
    • Tsunami research from three different approaches is comprehensively reviewed and summarized.
    • From the direct post-tsunami field survey to the complicated numerical and physical models, understanding of tsunami's sophisticated mechanism is gradually extended.
    • Great research efforts with interdisciplinary cooperation is appealed for the tsunamis simultaneously triggered by multiple sources.
  • With the increase in economic activities and population in the coastal region worldwide, the demand for the prevention and mitigation of tsunamis has dramatically increased, especially considering the relatively high frequent occurrence of global tsunamis in the last two decades. With the development of various research approaches, researchers are always on the way to a superior understanding of the generation, propagation, and inundation processes of tsunamis.

    Developed from the traditional single intuitive analysis, the acknowledgment of the causes and characteristics of tsunamis has currently turned into an interdisciplinary study with composite mechanisms. This phenomenon is ascribed to the emergence of multi-research approaches and relevant supporting technologies. Tsunamis were often previously studied as secondary disasters after earthquakes or volcanic eruptions. Assumptions indicate that the tectonic movement of the earth's crust is the direct source of tsunamis (e.g., earthquakes and volcano eruptions). The achievement of information relies on the field survey and survivor interviews, which turns out to be the text description and rough data-based characteristic records of tsunamis. With the recent gradual maturity of post-disaster survey techniques, computer-based numerical simulation models, and the completeness of the worldwide stereoscopic measure station network, the complete tsunami wave sequence and the corresponding information can be extensively recorded. Therefore, the effective information embedded in various data can be fully mined through field surveys (Liu et al. 2005; Mori et al. 2011), numerical simulations (Titov et al. 2005; Shimozono et al. 2012), laboratory experiments (Yeh et al. 1994; Liu et al. 2014), statistical analysis (Zhang and Niu 2020; Gao et al. 2022), and theoretical analysis (Deng et al. 2016; Cheng and Liu 2020; Cheng and Liu 2023; Zeng and Liu 2022). These tsunami studies gradually extend our understanding of the physical insights of tsunamis, which helps establish effective countermeasures against this natural disaster.

    A general review of the existing tsunami studies is created in this paper from a twofold viewpoint: tsunami with different generation mechanisms and tsunami research using different research approaches. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews the tsunamis induced by earthquakes, landslides, volcano eruptions, and meteorological events. Among these events, earthquake or meteorological event-induced tsunamis can lead to transoceanic damages, while landslide or volcano eruption-induced tsunamis generally result in local disasters. Section 3 further discusses various tsunami research approaches, including post-tsunami field surveys, numerical simulations, and laboratory experiments. Section 4 finally provides a brief conclusion.

    An offshore earthquake with sea floor displacement is regarded as the most common cause of enormous transoceanic tsunamis (Figure 1), which generally lead to catastrophic damages and loss of human lives. Such destructive tsunamis can be dated back to the Jougan/Keicho earthquake and tsunami in 869/1611 in Japan (Minoura et al. 2001) and the Lisbon earthquake tsunami in 1755 (the largest tsunami directly encountered in Europe (Zitellini et al. 2001)). These events provide an example for researchers to understand the tsunami phenomenon preliminarily. In the modern period, the 1960 Chilean tsunami, induced by a great Mw 9.5 earthquake off the Chilean coast (the largest earthquake ever instrumentally recorded), even hit the Pacific coast of Japan approximately 22 h after the earthquake, causing unexpected far-field damages. The 2004 Sumatra tsunami resulted in considerable fatalities around the Indian Ocean coast. The 2011 Tohoku tsunami led to serious infrastructure damage and impacted coastal communities despite the leading role of Japan in implementing tsunami mitigation measures, which even caused iceberg calving in Antarctica (Brunt et al. 2011). The rupture fault (coseismic tsunami source area) of the subduction zone tsunami is generally remarkably large on the order of several hundred kilometers (Kato et al. 2012), which can even reach 1600 km for the 2004 Sumatra earthquake/tsunami (the longest rupture fault till now (Nalbant et al. 2005)). As indicated in Figure 1, the significant movement of the seabed rupture fault (generally occurring within several minutes), especially in the vertical direction, could trigger the displacement of the quiescent water body above the seabed, thus initiating the outward propagation of the tsunami movement.

    Figure  1  Sketch of the earthquake-induced tsunami
    Download: Full-Size Img

    In the nearshore area, the early warning signal of the incoming tsunami could come from the ground shaking, the abnormal ebb tide (the coastline rapidly recedes, exposing a wide area of the seafloor), and unusual noises (Gregg et al. 2006). When this type of tsunami approaches the coastal region, the tsunami wave height could rapidly and significantly increase due to the wave shoaling from the gradually shallow bathymetry and the negligible offshore wave steepness, forming a high water wall with a fast propagation velocity (around 10 m/s (Fritz et al. 2012)) and resulting in a tremendous momentum if impacting on the coastal structures. Catastrophic damages to coastal infrastructures and human societies occur after the inundation of the land. Earthquake-induced tsunamis occur right after the earthquake, under which coastal infrastructures have generally become fragile after the high-frequency ground shaking by the earthquake, thus weakening the protecting function of structures. Simultaneously, other concomitant disasters, such as land subsidence (Meilianda et al. 2010), liquefaction (Yulianto et al. 2020), and fire (Onozato et al. 2016), could also further deteriorate the aftermaths of the earthquake and tsunami.

    The study of the earthquake-induced tsunami gradually accelerated since the 1960s and became increasingly popular after the 1990s with the abrupt surge in the relevant literature (Cheng et al. 2020). Studies on past tsunami events generally rely on sporadic written records (Lau et al. 2010) as well as on the analysis of tsunami deposits from the geological viewpoint (Ishimura and Miyauchi 2015). With the development of the network for seismological observation (on the land (GEONET) (Ozawa et al. 2011), and even in the sea (SGOS) (Sato et al. 2011)), various first-hand earthquake information could be accurately recorded, which facilitates the deep understanding of the subsequent tsunami generation and propagation. With the global deployment of a large number of offshore DART buoys and the installation of nearshore tidal gauge stations updated after the 2004 Sumatra tsunami, real-time offshore and nearshore tsunami wave characteristics could be recorded; these characteristics are valuable for the prevention and mitigation efforts in the coastal region.

    The study of the earthquake-induced tsunami generally focuses on the following three main themes: tsunami generation, propagation, and inundation. For tsunami generation, the waveforms recorded in buoys and tide gauges contain information concerning the spatial and temporal distributions of the fault slip (Satake et al. 2013), which could be used to inverse the tsunami source parameters (Fujii et al. 2011). The initial gradual rise in the water level is associated with large slips at the deep plate interface. Meanwhile, the delayed huge slip with dynamic overshoot is responsible for the generation of the enormous impulsive wave in the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, causing unexpected disasters in the coastal region (Ide et al. 2011). In addition, the inelastic deformation of unconsolidated sediments and a coseismic slip on splay faults (Hossen et al. 2015) and the effects of the horizontal displacement of the seafloor (Gusman et al. 2012), the trench slope (MacInnes et al. 2013), and the strike-slip earthquake (sloshing effect) (Elbanna et al. 2021; Han et al. 2021) could be possible candidates for tsunami generation.

    Regarding tsunami propagation, various factors could affect the tsunami wave properties, such as ocean ridges, which may guide the tsunami propagation (Wang et al. 2021). Furthermore, Kowalik and Murty (1989) indicated that the Coriolis force has minimal influence on small period waves, whereas the tsunami wave along the shelf with a long period is likely to be modified by the Coriolis force. Nevertheless, the Coriolis force mainly influences the wave height and not the traveling time (Shuto 1991). In addition, astronomic tides may affect tsunami dynamics, leading to the amplification of tsunami height due to the nonlinear interaction between tide and tsunami in the coastal region (Myers and Baptista 2001).

    Considering the tsunami inundation over the land region, one of the fundamental subjects of tsunami research is disaster prevention and mitigation, in which a tsunami hazard map is generally required for the tsunami risk assessment (Horspool et al. 2014). Such a tsunami hazard map not only depends on the incoming tsunami characteristics (e.g., water depth and flow velocity) but also on the detailed local topography feature and building configuration, as well as many human-related factors (local population density, accessibility to the evaluation route, and age distribution of the society) and community-related factors (industry layout, city planning). Protection of the landward buildings provided by the seaward front buildings was confirmed in different places during the 2011 Tohoku tsunami field survey (Liu et al. 2013; Yeh et al. 2013). Probabilistic hazard assessments are a fundamental tool for assessing the threats posed by hazards to societies and are important for underpinning evidence-based decision making regarding risk mitigation activities. Efficient rescue operations and reasonable evaluation planning could be achieved by applying the pre-assessed tsunami hazard map.

    A landslide tsunami is defined as a tsunami caused by subaerial or submarine mass failure, as shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. Landslide-induced tsunamis are rare considering the statistical results of tsunami database (Cheng et al. 2020) and are also thought to be markedly localized and of lower energy than earthquake-induced tsunamis; however, recent studies reveal that such tsunamis could also produce destructive tsunami waves (McMurthy et al. 2004). The coseismic source area is considerably larger than those caused by landslides; however, landslides may generate substantially high local tsunamis. For instance, the 1958 Lituya Bay megatsunami caused a tsunami run-up height of more than 524 m, which is the highest record height ever (Fritz et al. 2009b). Even in the inland area, landslides may lead to damage to the opposite side of the reservoirs or rivers. For instance, a significant landslide occurred in Daning River, Chongqing, China, in 2015, which induced a 6 m high bore and caused casualties and overturning of many ships.

    Figure  2  Sketch of the landslide-induced tsunamis
    Download: Full-Size Img

    Quantifying the size and return period of various landslides is still challenging (Geist and Lynett 2014). In many cases, landslides are regarded as the additional tsunami source to the primary source of vertical displacement of the seafloor induced by an earthquake (further intensification of the nearshore tsunami height); thus, landslide-induced tsunamis have currently gradually attracted the attention of researchers. Tappin et al. (2014) indicated that if the Tohoku tsunami is entirely ascribed to slipping on an earthquake fault, some discrepancies still exist between the published model and recorded data (e.g., the observed run-up heights of up to 40 m measured along the Sanriku coast, the timing and high-frequency content of tsunami recorded at nearshore buoys, and the biases of rupture centroids). Accordingly, they argued that submarine landslides should also be considered. During the 2018 Sulawesi tsunami, a destructive tsunami reached Pula city within a few minutes after the collapse of landslides close to the coastal areas (Nagai et al. 2021). Takagi et al. (2019) argued that any modern early warning system is unlikely to work effectively against such short-warning time tsunamis. Thus, considering a way to help quickly increase the awareness of local residents of the potential disaster and evacuate them from the landslides is necessary for disaster risk managers. Considering the South China Sea region, giant submarine landslides on the continental shelves (e.g., Brunei and Baiyun submarine slides) are also deemed as hitherto fundamentally unquantified tsunami threats (Terry et al. 2017; Li et al. 2022), on which various studies have been conducted (Ren et al. 2019).

    During the eruption of underwater or coastal volcanos, part of the released energy could be directly or indirectly transmitted to the sea, leading to the generation of tsunamis. Volcanic tsunamis are popular around the Pacific rim of the volcanic zone, especially in Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Philippines, and Papua New Guinea), representing around 5% of all tsunamis listed for the last four centuries (Latter 1981). The direct disasters caused by the submarine volcanic eruption are often small, ascribed to its location in the deep ocean and the rare surrounding residents. However, the consequences of these disasters could be significant once it triggers a tsunami. The 1883 Krakatoa tsunami, which is the largest historical tsunami due to volcanic activities, was caused by the eruption of Krakatoa, a submarine volcano located in Indonesia. The pyroclastic flows from this eruption reached the sea, and the triggered tsunami wave ran up to 41 m, leading to 36000 fatalities (Simkin and Fiske 1983). Ward and Day (2001) argued that with the eruption of the Cumbre Vieja volcano, a huge amount of rock could drop into the sea, triggering tsunamis transiting the entire Atlantic Basin and then arriving at the US coasts with 10–25 m in height.

    Various mechanisms are implied in the generation of volcanic tsunamis, as demonstrated in Figure 3. Except for Figure 3(b), other subfigures of Figure 3, though with different scenarios, are consistent with the tsunami formation of water displacement. The most destructive are those generated by the impacts of pyroclastic flow deposits into the sea (Figure 3(c)) as well as volcanic-triggered landslides (similar to the mechanisms shown in Figure 2). Therefore, volcano eruption-induced tsunamis are frequently associated with landslide-induced tsunamis (which could also be triggered by the earthquake). On the contrary to caldera collapse (Figure 3(d)), caldera uplift associated with volcanic activities can be regarded as another generation mechanism for volcanic tsunamis, as evidenced during the 2015 Torishima volcanic tsunami, Japan (Sandanbata et al. 2018).

    Figure  3  Typical causes of the volcano eruption-induced tsunamis (similar to Paris et al. (2014))
    Download: Full-Size Img

    The precise nature and dynamics of the interactions and processes that generate waves during volcano eruptions are slightly understood. Nevertheless, with the recent re-eruption of the Anak Krakatau volcano and accompanying tsunamis from flank collapse in 2018, volcano eruption-induced tsunamis attracted significant attention among researchers. The 2018 Anak Krakatau volcano flank collapse involved a relatively small slide volume (< 0.2 km3) but produced a deadly tsunami affecting local coastlines due to the lack of warning (Ye et al. 2020). The post-event field survey confirmed that the maximum tsunami run-up height is 13.5 m and the maximum inundation distance is 330 m with a short tsunami period nature of 6.6–7.4 min (Muhari et al. 2019).

    The meteorological tsunami, also known as "meteotsunamis, " is caused by a sharp change in the atmospheric pressure, that is, the atmospheric pressure disturbance, which is related to various meteorological events (e.g., tropical cyclones (Niu and Zhou 2015; Zhang and Liu 2021)). For a static case, the pressure drop of 1 hPa leads to an elevated water surface of approximately 1 cm, while a moving low-pressure system could cause a substantially large water level rise and a considerably complex wave pattern (Niu and Chen 2020; Zhang and Liu 2022). Previously, the meteotsunami was an underrated hazard (Pattiaratchi and Wijeratne 2015). By contrast, Vilibić et al. (2021) confirmed that the occurrence rate of meteotsunamis has strongly increased in recent years. The eruption of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga volcano significantly raised the interest of researchers in the meteorological tsunami, which is a typical example of the volcanic meteorological source of the tsunami, as shown in Figure 3(b).

    On Jan. 15, 2022, the eruption of the Hunga-Tonga volcano generated a violent underwater explosion, created atmospheric pressure disturbances spreading out in the form of Lamb waves detected in in-situ observations all over the globe (Amores et al. 2022), which could even be tracked for more than a week while they propagated five times around the earth (Otsuka 2022). Fast-moving atmospheric Lamb waves are confirmed to drive the uniformly small leading tsunami waves (Kataoka et al. 2022; Yamada et al. 2022), which arrived earlier than theoretically expected for a tsunami wave freely propagating away from the volcano (Carvajal et al. 2022). Kubota et al. (2022) confirmed that the scattering of the leading waves related to bathymetric variations in the Pacific Ocean produced subsequent long-lasting tsunamis, and various waves generated from moving and static sources increase the complexity and lengthen the duration of tsunamis compared with ordinary earthquake-induced tsunamis.

    Section 2 reviews global tsunamis considering their genetic sources. The complexity of the tsunami research lies in the accompanying superposition of multiple generation mechanisms in different temporal and spatial sequences during the occurrence of a tsunami event. For instance, the generation of the 2022 Tonga tsunamis comes from the superposition of volcano eruption, landslide, and meteorological Lamb waves. The sources of some tsunami events are still under debate despite extensive studies. For example, Choi et al. (2003) claimed that the 1883 Krakatau tsunamis were volcanic meteorological tsunamis, while Maeno and Imamura (2011) argued that they were induced by a large volume of pyroclastic flow with a certain discharge rate. Therefore, the tsunami research still needs further investigation.

    Post-tsunami field survey is a fundamental tsunami research approach used to obtain crucial and first-hand scientific data on the relevant tsunami event. In the past, the tsunami information relied on the interviews of survivors recorded in some historical documents (e.g., drawings and paintings) to restore the previous scenarios. Since the late 1800s, post-tsunami surveys started to collect relevant data by immediately locating the impacted areas after the disaster, and these surveys are characterized by the systematic measurement and reporting of wave heights (Bourgeois 2009). For example, detailed tsunami height records are available for the 1896 Meiji earthquake and tsunami along the Sanriku region, Japan, a tsunami-prone region (Liu et al. 2013).

    The establishment of the International Tsunami Survey Team after the 1992 Nicaragua tsunami promotes the standardization of post-tsunami field survey methodology with international and interdisciplinary collaboration (Satake et al. 1993). Tsunami traces, such as watermarks on buildings and windows, debris lines on the beach or roof, and changes in vegetation color, could only be retained within a limited period after the tsunami event; therefore, a post-event field survey must first be conducted after tsunamis and other similar disasters, such as storm surges (Fritz et al. 2009a). In such a survey, the inundation and run-up heights are generally measured by laser, GPS, and other instruments with tidal correction. Figure 4 shows typical definitions of different tsunami hydrodynamic terminologies, including the tsunami height, flow depth (inundation depth), inundation height, run-up height, and inundation distance.

    Figure  4  Definition of different tsunami hydrodynamic data terminologies (similar to IOC-UNESCO (1998))
    Download: Full-Size Img

    After the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, different survey teams conducted post-tsunami data collections all around the Indian Ocean coasts, including Sumatra and Banda Aceh (the most damaged areas near the epicenter (Borrero 2005)), Thailand (Siripong 2006), India (Yeh et al. 2006), Sri Lanka (Liu et al. 2005), and even in Oman (Okal et al. 2006) and Somalia (Fritz and Borrero 2006). Regarding the 2011 Tohoku tsunami, approximately 300 researchers from throughout Japan participated in the post-tsunami survey, and the joint research groups conducted a tsunami survey along a 2000 km stretch of the Japanese coast (Mori et al. 2012). More than 5200 locations have been surveyed, even within the 30 km restricted zone of the Fukushima nuclear power plant, generating the largest tsunami survey dataset in the world (publicly available at https://coastal.jp/tsunami2011/). This survey revealed that maximum run-up heights larger than 10 m are distributed along 500 km of the Japanese coast in direct distance.

    Today, numerical simulation has become a powerful approach for tsunami research, playing significant roles in real-time forecasting and warnings as well as hazard assessment. The depth-integrated linear shallow water equation (LSWE) is generally used as the governing equation, and the fi nite difference method is used for the numerical scheme to simulate the transoceanic propagation of tsunami waves timely for tsunami early warning. Nevertheless, the application of the nonlinear shallow water equation (NLSWE) is necessary to simulate the local tsunami propagation in the nearshore area as well as its inundation over the land accurately. Table 1 lists four globally used tsunami numerical models. The characteristics and applications of these models are also specified. Sugawara (2021) established a detailed review of the numerical modeling of tsunamis. Two different approaches are introduced to solve the frequency dispersion in the numerical simulation. The first approach is based on the LSWE/NLSWE but utilizes the numerical errors (i.e., numerical dispersion) by carefully selecting the spatial and temporal grid sizes (e.g., Burwell et al. 2007; Wang 2009). The second approach aims to implement the Boussinesq equation with iterative calculations of the large matrix to solve its dispersive term (Sato 1996; Fuhrman and Madsen 2009; Grilli et al. 2019). In addition, the Green–Naghdi equations are applied to earthquake-induced and underwater landslide-induced tsunamis (Zhao et al. 2011; Duan and Zhao 2013). Using the Navier–Stokes equations, Ai et al. (2021) established a three-dimensional non-hydrostatic model for submarine landslide-induced tsunami wave simulation. Simulation of the tsunami propagation and inundation process has generally reached a satisfactory stage, while further improvement of the numerical modeling is limited by the relatively unsatisfactory estimation of the tsunami source parameters, which determine the initial conditions of the numerical simulation. Different from the aforementioned deterministic numerical simulations, probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment (PTHA) is a fundamental tool for assessing the threats posed by hazards to communities. PTHA, which introduces the methods of probability and statistics and considers the uncertainty of related parameters (e.g., possible tsunami-genic sources, uncertainties of model inputs, and parameters in systematic ways of formulations) as much as possible to describe the return period of tsunami events, is an important method for underpinning evidence-based decision making considering risk mitigation activities (Horspool et al. 2014). For example, Geist and Parsons (2006) developed the relationship between tsunami size and exceedance probabilities for a given location and period. With 1380000 potential earthquake scenarios, Gao et al. (2022) conducted the PTHA for the coast around the Pearl River estuary and assessed the tsunami hazards posed by the earthquakes along the Manila Trench. Accordingly, PTHA could be a powerful approach to tsunami risk management and disaster mitigation.

    Table  1  Four typical tsunami numerical models
    Models Reference Characteristics Main Applications Additions
    TSUNAMI Goto et al. (1997) SWE solved in leapfrog schemes Tsunami simulation; real-time forecasting and warning Versions: N2/N3/F1/F2
    MOST Titov and Gonzalez.(1997) SWE in the spherical coordinate system to consider the earth curvature and Coriolis force Simulation of the tsunami generation, propagation, and inundation process Standard tsunami model for NCTR in the USA
    COMCOT Liu et al.(1998) SWE in the spherical and Cartesian coordinate solved with the multinested grid system Tsunami simulations in deep-water, nearshore coastal regions, and inundation Latest version: 1.7
    GEOCLAW LeVeque and George (2008) Application of Clawpack model in tsunami with the adaptive mesh encryption system Simulation of the detailed wave fission due to the allowance of the discontinuities High numerical efficiency

    Several experimental studies have been conducted on tsunamis. In these studies, different wave shapes have been applied to represent the tsunami hydrodynamics, such as solitary wave (breaking or nonbreaking (Synolakis 1987; Li and Raichlen 2001)), trough-led N-wave (Goseberg et al. 2013; Schimmels et al. 2016), and dam–break wave (Lauber and Hager 1998; Wuthrich et al. 2018). Such experimental studies help reveal the tsunami hydrodynamic characteristics in their different propagation stages, including detailed flow features (water depth, flow velocity (Liu and Liu 2017)), tsunami wave/bore run-up process along the slope (Lu et al. 2018; Wu and Liu 2022), as well as beach response and groundwater movement under tsunami actions (Exton and Yeh 2022; Yang et al. 2022).

    Various damages on the coastal structures could easily be observed in the disaster area during the post-tsunami field survey. Accordingly, tsunami interaction on coastal structures and their failure mechanisms become an important research theme in laboratory experiments considering the safe design of coastal structures in the future. A 2D flume is generally used to investigate the bore/surge impact on the vertical wall, mainly focusing on the impact pressure measurement (Ramsden 1996; Lobovsky et al. 2014; Kihara et al. 2015). The bore/surge impact on a wall leads to complicated pressure signals, which are fairly sensitive spatially and temporally. Shen et al. (2020) classified the entire surge impact process into three stages and vertically divided it into two impact zones. Results confirmed that such bore/surge impact process and pressure are nondeterministic (Xie and Shimozono 2022) due to the air entrapment effect in the intensive turbulent impact process. In addition, Shen and Liu (2022) confirmed that not only the hydrodynamic features but also the structure parameters are crucial considering the structural dynamic response of a coastal structure, and resonance becomes nonnegligible for structures with small damping and short natural period. 3D physical experiments are recently conducted to simulate the tsunami inundation and wave pressures regarding the actual field situations (Kihara et al. 2021; Krautwald et al. 2022), which further extend the understanding of the tsunami–structure interaction process.

    For the above tsunami–structure studies, structures are generally fixed; as moving structures, tsunami boulders could also be frequently observed during the post-tsunami field survey (Sato et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2013). Investigations on such a boulder movement provide valuable information to help identify and interpret paleo-tsunami imprints on the coastal landscapes, which is useful for evaluating the risk of future tsunami disasters and aiding in future disaster mitigation efforts. Liu et al. (2014) conducted a series of tsunami boulder experiments in a dam – break flume and confirmed that boulder dislodgement is not triggered immediately by the arrival of the tsunami bore, and the total boulder displacement is rather sensitive to the initial incoming flow conditions. Subsequently, many experimental studies related to tsunami boulder transport are available, as comprehensively reviewed by Oetjen et al. (2020). They suggested that rather than exact values, parameter ranges should be used in the model analysis considering the complex physics and limited current knowledge.

    This study creates a general review of the global tsunami research from two different aspects, namely, tsunamis caused by different generation mechanisms and tsunami research using different research approaches. Considering the generation source, tsunamis induced by earthquakes, landslides, volcano eruptions, and meteorological factors are reviewed in sequence. Meanwhile, three different research approaches applied in the tsunami study are also discussed with the integration of the up-to-date outcomes from each individual approach. With time passing by, the understanding of tsunamis gradually extends from the most common one caused by earthquakes to the sophisticated meteorological tsunamis and from the direct post-tsunami field survey to the complicated numerical and physical models. These phenomena significantly improve the ability to set up an effective tsunami early warning system and protect and mitigate tsunami-induced disasters. Nevertheless, tsunamis simultaneously triggered by multiple sources, such as the recent 2022 Hunga-Tonga volcano eruption-induced transoceanic tsunamis, still need further comprehensive research efforts with interdisciplinary cooperation.

  • Figure  1   Sketch of the earthquake-induced tsunami

    Download: Full-Size Img

    Figure  2   Sketch of the landslide-induced tsunamis

    Download: Full-Size Img

    Figure  3   Typical causes of the volcano eruption-induced tsunamis (similar to Paris et al. (2014))

    Download: Full-Size Img

    Figure  4   Definition of different tsunami hydrodynamic data terminologies (similar to IOC-UNESCO (1998))

    Download: Full-Size Img

    Table  1   Four typical tsunami numerical models

    Models Reference Characteristics Main Applications Additions
    TSUNAMI Goto et al. (1997) SWE solved in leapfrog schemes Tsunami simulation; real-time forecasting and warning Versions: N2/N3/F1/F2
    MOST Titov and Gonzalez.(1997) SWE in the spherical coordinate system to consider the earth curvature and Coriolis force Simulation of the tsunami generation, propagation, and inundation process Standard tsunami model for NCTR in the USA
    COMCOT Liu et al.(1998) SWE in the spherical and Cartesian coordinate solved with the multinested grid system Tsunami simulations in deep-water, nearshore coastal regions, and inundation Latest version: 1.7
    GEOCLAW LeVeque and George (2008) Application of Clawpack model in tsunami with the adaptive mesh encryption system Simulation of the detailed wave fission due to the allowance of the discontinuities High numerical efficiency
  • Ai C, Ma Y, Yuan C, Xie Z, Dong G (2021) A three-dimensional non-hydrostatic model for tsunami waves generated by submarine landslides. Appl. Math. Model. 96: 1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm. 2021.02.014 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apm.2021.02.014
    Amores A, Monserrat S, Marcos M, Argüeso D, Villalonga J, Jordà G, Gomis D (2022) Numerical simulation of atmospheric Lamb waves generated by the 2022 Hunga-Tonga volcanic eruption. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49: e2022GL098240. DOI: 10.1029/ 2022GL098240 https://doi.org/ 10.1029/2022GL098240
    Borrero JC (2005) Field survey of Northern Sumatra and Banda Aceh, Indonesia after the Tsunami and Earthquake of 26 December 2004. Seismol. Res. Lett. 76(3): 312-320. DOI: 10.1785/gssrl. 76.3.312 https://doi.org/ 10.1785/gssrl.76.3.312
    Bourgeois J (2009) Geologic effects and records of tsunamis. In: E. N. Bernard, A. R. Robinson (eds. ) The Sea, 15: 53-91
    Brunt KM, Okal EA, MacAyeal DR (2011) Antarctic ice-shelf calving triggered by the Honshu (Japan) earthquake and tsunami, March 2011. J. Glaciol. 57(205): 785-788. DOI: 10.3189/ 002214311798043681 https://doi.org/ 10.3189/002214311798043681
    Burwell D, Tolkova E, Chawla A (2007) Diffusion and dispersion characterization of a numerical tsunami model. Ocean Model. 19: 10-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2007.05.003
    Carvajal M, Sepúlveda I, Gubler A, Garreaud R (2022) Worldwide signature of the 2022 Tonga Volcanic Tsunami. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49: e2022GL098153. DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098153
    Cheng S, Liu H (2020) Are all KdV-type shallow water wave equations the same with uniform solutions? Coastal Eng. J. 62(4): 460-472. DOI: 10.1080/21664250.2020.1796240
    Cheng S, Liu H (2023) Weakly nonlinear waves over the bottom disturbed topography: Korteweg-de Vries equation with variable coefficients. Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluid 98: 238-246. DOI: 10.1016/j. euromechflu.2022.12.010 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.12.010
    Cheng S, Zeng J, Liu H (2020) A comprehensive review of the worldwide existing tsunami databases. J. Earthq. Tsunami 14(5): 2040003. DOI: 10.1142/S1793431120400035
    Choi BH, Pelinovsky E, Kim KO, Lee JS (2003) Simulation of the trans-oceanic tsunami propagation due to the 1883 Krakatau volcanic eruption. Nat. Hazards. Earth. Syst. Sci. 3: 321-332. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-3-321-2003
    Deng X, Liu H, Jiang Z, Baldock T (2016) Swash flow properties with bottom resistance based on the method of characteristics. Coastal Eng. 114: 25-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.03.012
    Duan W, Zhao B (2013) Simulation on 2D underwater landslide-induced tsunamis. Theor. App. Mech. Lett. 3: 032004. DOI: 10.1063/2.1303204
    Elbanna A, Abdelmeguida M, Ma X, Amlanic F, Bhatd HS, Synolakise C, Rosakis AJ (2021) Anatomy of strike-slip fault tsunami genesis. P. Natl Acad. Sci USA (PNAS) 118(19): e2025632118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025632118
    Exton M, Yeh H (2022) Effects of an impermeable layer on pore pressure response to tsunami-like inundation. Proc. R. Soc. A 478: 20210605. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2021.0605
    Fritz HM, Borrero JC (2006) Somalia field survey after the December 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Earthquake Spectra 22 (3_suppl. ): 219-233. DOI: 10.1193/1.2201972
    Fritz HM, Blount CD, Thwin S, Thu MK, Chan N (2009a) Cyclone Nargis storm surge in Myanmar. Nat. Geosci. 2: 448-449. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo558
    Fritz HM, Mohammed F, Yoo J (2009b) Lituya Bay landslide impact generated Mega-Tsunami 50th Anniversary. In: Cummins, P. R., Satake, K., Kong, L.S.L. (eds) Tsunami Science Four Years After the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, Pageoph Topical Volumes, Birkhäuser Basel. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0346-0064-4_9
    Fritz HM, Phillips DA, Okayasu A, Shimozono T, Liu H, Mohammed F, Skanavis V, Synolakis CE, Takahashi T (2012) The 2011 Japan tsunami current velocity measurements from survivor videos at Kesennuma Bay using LiDAR. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39: L00G23. DOI: 10.1029/2011GL050686
    Fuhrman DR, Madsen PA (2009) Tsunami generation, propagation, and run-up with a high-order Boussinesq model. Coastal Eng. 56(7): 747-758. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.02.004
    Fujii Y, Satake K, Sakai S, Shinohara M, Kanazawa T (2011) Tsunami source of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Earth, Planets Space 63: 55. DOI: 10.5047/eps.2011. 06.010 https://doi.org/ 10.5047/eps.2011.06.010
    Gao X, Zhao G, Niu X (2022) An approach for quantifying nearshore tsunami height probability and its application to the Pearl River Estuary. Coast. Eng. 175: 104139. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng. 2022.104139 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104139
    Geist EL, Parsons T (2006) Probabilistic analysis of tsunami hazards. Nat. Hazards. 37: 277-314. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-005-4646-z
    Geist EL, Lynett PJ (2014) Source processes for the probabilistic assessment of tsunami hazards. Oceanography 27: 86-93. DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2014.43
    Goseberg N, Wurpts A, Schlurmann T (2013) Laboratory-scale generation of tsunami and long waves. Coastal Eng. 79: 57-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.04.006
    Goto C, Ogawa Y, Shuto N, Imamura F (1997) Numerical method of tsunami simulation with the leap-frog scheme. IUGG/IOC Time project, Manuals and Guides, UNESCO
    Gregg CE, Houghton BF, Paton D, Lachman R, Lachman J, Johnston DM, Wongbusarakum S (2006) Natural warning signs of tsunamis: Human sensory experience and response to the 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami in Thailand. Earthquake Spectra 22(3_suppl. ): 671-691. DOI: 10.1193/1.2206791
    Grilli ST, Tappin DR, Carey S, Watt SFL, Ward SN, Grilli AR, Engwell SL, Zhang C, Kirby JT, Schambach L, Muin M (2019) Modelling of the tsunami from the December 22, 2018 lateral collapse of Anak Krakatau volcano in the Sunda Straits, Indonesia. Sci. Rep. 9: 11946. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48327-6
    Gusman AR, Tanioka Y, Sakai S, Tsushima H (2012) Source model of the great 2011 Tohoku earthquake estimated from tsunami waveforms and crustal deformation data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 341-344: 234-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.006
    Han P, Yu H, Yu X (2021) A sloshing induced Tsunami: 2018 Palu Bay event. Applied Ocean Res. 117: 102915. DOI: 10.1016/j. apor.2021.102915 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102915
    Hossen MJ, Cummins PR, Dettmer J, Baba T (2015) Tsunami waveform inversion or sea surface displacement following the 2011 Tohoku earthquake: importance of dispersion and source kinematics. J. Geophys. Res. Solid. Earth. 120: 6452-6473. DOI: 10.1002/2015JB011942
    Horspool N, Pranantyo I, Griffin J, Latief H, Natawidjaja DH, Kongko W, Cipta A, Bustaman B, Anugrah SD, Thio HK (2014) A probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment for Indonesia. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14: 3105-3122. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-3105-2014.
    Ide S, Baltay A, Beroza G (2011) Shallow dynamic overshoot and energetic deep rupture in the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Science 332: 1426-1429. DOI: 10.1126/science.1207020
    IOC-UNESCO (1998) Post- Tsunami survey field guide. 1st ed., IOC Manuals and Guides, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission
    Ishimura D, Miyauchi T (2015) Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits during the last 4000 years and their correlations with historical tsunami events in Koyadori on the Sanriku Coast, northeastern Japan. Prog. Earth Planetary Sc. 2: 16. DOI: 10.1186/s40645-015-0047-4
    Kataoka R, Winn SD, Touber E (2022) Meteotsunamis in Japan associated with the Tonga Eruption in January 2022. Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere 18: 103-106. DOI: 10.2151/sola.2022-019
    Kato A, Obara K, Igarashi T, Tsuruoka H, Nakagawa S, Hirata N (2012) Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Science 335: 705-708. DOI: 10.1126/ science.1215141 https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1215141
    Kihara N, Niida Y, Takabatake D, Kaida H, Shibayama A, Miyagawa Y (2015) Large-scale experiments on tsunami-induced pressure on a vertical tide wall. Coastal Eng. 99: 46-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.02.009
    Kihara N, Arikawa T, Asai T, Hasebe M, Ikeya T, Inoue S, Kaida H, Matsutomi H, Nakano Y, Okuda Y, Okuno S, Ooie T, Shigihara Y, Shoji G, Tateno T, Tsurudome C, Watanabe M (2021) A physical model of tsunami inundation and wave pressures for an idealized coastal industrial site. Coastal Eng. 169: 103970. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103970
    Kowalik Z, Murty TS (1989) On some future tsunamis in the Pacific Ocean. Nat. Hazards 1(4): 349-369. DOI: 10.1007/BF00134833
    Krautwald C, Hafen HV, Niebuhr P, Vogele K, Schurenkamp D, Sieder M, Goseberg N (2022) Large-scale physical modeling of broken solitary waves impacting elevated coastal structures. Coastal Eng. J. 64(1): 169-189. DOI: 10.1080/21664250.2021.2023380
    Kubota T, Saito T, Nishida K (2022) Global fast-traveling tsunamis driven by atmospheric Lamb waves on the 2022 Tonga eruption. Science 377: 91-94. DOI: 10.1126/science.abo4364
    Latter JN (1981) Tsunamis of volcanic origin: summary of causes with particular references to Krakatoa, 1883. Bull Volcanol 44(3): 467-490. DOI: 10.1007/BF02600578
    Lau AYA, Switzer AD, Dominey-Howes D, Aitchison JC, Zong Y (2010) Written records of historical tsunamis in the northeastern South China Sea – challenges associated with developing a new integrated database. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10: 1793-1806. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-10-1793-2010
    Lauber G, Hager WH (1998) Experiments to dambreak wave: Horizontal channel. J. Hydraul. Res. 36(3): 291-307. DOI: 10.1080/ 00221689809498620 https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00221689809498620
    LeVeque RJ, George DL (2008) High-resolution finite volume methods for the shallow water equations with topography and dry-states. Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Advanced Numerical models for Simulating Tsunami Waves and Runup, 43-73. DOI: 10.1142/9789812790910_0002
    Li L, Qiu Q, Li Z, Zhang P (2022) Tsunami hazard assessment in the South China Sea: A review of recent progress and research gaps. Sci. China Earth Sci. 65: 783-809. DOI: 10.1007/s11430-021-9893-8
    Li Y, Raichlen F (2001) Solitary wave runup on plane slopes. J. Waterway, Port, Coastal Eng. 127(1): 33-44. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2001)127:1(33)
    Liu H, Liu H (2017) Experimental study on the dam-break hydrodynamic characteristics under different conditions. J. Disaster Res. 12(1): 198-207. DOI: 10.20965/jdr.2017.p0198
    Liu H, Sakashita T, Sato S (2014) An experimental study on the tsunami boulder movement. Proceedings of 34th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ICCE2014, Seoul. DOI: 10.9753/icce.v34.currents.16
    Liu H, Shimozono T, Takagawa T, Okayasu A, Fritz HM, Sato S, Tajima Y (2013) The 11 March 2011 Tohoku tsunami survey in Rikuzentakata and comparison with historical events. Pure Appl. Geophys. 170(6): 1033-1046. DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0496-2
    Liu PLF, Woo SB, Cho YS (1998) Computer programs for tsunami propagation and inundation. Technical Report, Cornell University.
    Liu PLF, Lynett P, Fernando H, Jaffe BE, Fritz H, Higman B, Morton R, Goff J, Synolakis C (2005) Observations by the international tsunami survey team in Sri Lanka. Science 308: 1595. DOI: 10.1126/science.1110730
    Lobovsky L, Botia-Vera E, Castellana F, Mas-Soler J, Souto-Iglesias A (2014) Experimental investigation of dynamic pressure loads during dam break. J Fluid Struct. 48: 407-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.03.009
    Lu S, Liu H, Deng X (2018) An experimental study of the run-up process of breaking bores generated by dam-break under dry and wet bed conditions. J Earthq. Tsunami 12(2): 1840005. DOI: 10.1142/S1793431118400055
    MacInnes BT, Gusman AR, LeVeque RJ, Tanioka Y (2013) Comparison of earthquake source models for the 2011 Tohoku event using tsunami simulations and nearfield observations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103: 1256-1274. DOI: 10.1785/0120120121
    Maeno F, Imamura F (2011) Tsunami generation by a rapid entrance of pyroclastic flow into the sea during the 1883 Krakatau eruption, Indonesia. J. Geophys. Res. 116: B09205. DOI: 10.1029/2011JB008253
    McMurthy GM, Watts P, Fryer GJ, Smith JR, Imamura F (2004) Giant landslides, mega-tsunamis and paleo-sea level in the Hawaiian Islands. Mar. Geol. 203: 219-233. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00306-2
    Meilianda E, Dohmen-Janssen CM, Maathuisc BHP, Hulscherb SJMH, Mulder JPM (2010) Short-term morphological responses and developments of Banda Aceh coast, Sumatra Island, Indonesia after the tsunami on 26 December 2004. Mar. Geol. 275: 96-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2010.04.012
    Minoura K, Imamura F, Sugawara D, Kono Y, Iwashita T (2001). The 869 Jogan tsunami deposit and recurrence interval of large-scale tsunami on the Pacific coast of northeast Japan. J. Natural Disaster Sci. 23(2): 83-88
    Mori N, Takahashi T, Yasuda T, Yanagisawa H (2011) Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38: L00G14. DOI: 10.1029/2011GL049210
    Mori N, Takahashi T, Esteban M (2012) The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Joint Survey Group, 2012. Nationwide post event survey and analysis of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami. Coastal Eng. J. 54(4): 1250001. DOI: 10.1142/S0578563412500015
    Muhari A, Heidarzadeh M, Susmoro H, Nugroho HD, Kriswati E, Supartoyo Wijanarto AB, Imamura F, Arikawa T (2019) The December 2018 Anak Krakatau Volcano Tsunami as inferred from Post-Tsunami field surveys and spectral analysis. Pure Appl. Geophys. 176: 5219-5233. DOI: 10.1007/s00024-019-02358-2
    Myers EP, Baptista AM (2001) Analysis of factors influencing simulations of the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-Oki and 1964 Alaska Tsunamis. Nat. Hazards 23: 1-28. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008150210289
    Nagai K, Muhari A, Pakoksung K, Watanabe M, Suppasri A, Arikawa T, Imamura F (2021) Consideration of submarine landslide induced by 2018 Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami within Palu Bay. Coastal Eng. J. 63(4): 446-466. DOI: 10.1080/21664250.2021.1933749
    Nalbant SS, Steacy S, Sieh K, Natwidjaja D, McCloskey J (2005) Earthquake risk on the Sunda trench. Nature 435: 756-757. DOI: 10.1038/nature435756a
    Niu X, Zhou H (2015) Wave pattern induced by a moving atmospheric pressure disturbance. Appl. Ocean Res. 52: 37-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2015.05.003
    Niu X, Chen Y (2020) Energy accumulation during the growth of forced wave induced by a moving atmospheric pressure disturbance. Coastal Eng. J. 62(1): 23-34. DOI: 10.1080/ 21664250.2019.1682747 https://doi.org/ 10.1080/21664250.2019.1682747
    Oetjen J, Engel M, Schuttrumpf H (2020) Experiments on tsunami induced boulder transport – A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 220: 103714. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103714
    Okal EA, Fritz HM, Raad PE, Synolakis C, Al-Shijbi Y, Al-Saifi M (2006) Oman field survey after the December 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Earthquake Spectra 22(3_suppl. ): 203-218. DOI: 10.1193/ 1.2202647 https://doi.org/ 10.1193/1.2202647
    Onozato M, Nishigaki A, Okoshi K (2016) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments and bivalves on the Pacific Coast of Japan: Influence of tsunami and fire. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0156447. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156447
    Otsuka S (2022) Visualizing Lamb waves from a volcanic eruption using meteorological satellite Himawari-8. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49: e2022GL098324. DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098324
    Ozawa S, Nishimura T, Suito H, Kobayashi T, Tobita M, Imakiire T (2011) Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2011 magnitude-9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Nature 475: 373-376. DOI: 10.1038/ nature10227 https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature10227
    Paris R, Switzer AD, Belousova M, Belousov A, Ontowirjo B, Whelley PL, Ulvrova M (2014) Volcanic tsunami: a review of source mechanisms, past events and hazards in Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Philippines, Papua New Guinea). Nat. Hazards. 70: 447-470. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0822-8
    Pattiaratchi CB, Wijeratne EMS (2015) Are meteotsunamis an underrated hazard? Proc. R. Soc. A 373: 20140377. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0377
    Ramsden JD (1996) Forces on a vertical wall due to long waves, bores, and dry-bed surges. J Waterw. Port, Coast. Ocean Eng. 122(3): 134-141. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1996)122:3(134)
    Ren Z, Zhao X, Liu H (2019) Numerical study of the landslide tsunami in the South China Sea using Herschel-Bulkley rheological theory. Phys. Fluids 31: 056601. DOI: 10.1063/1.5087245
    Sandanbata O, Watada S, Satake K, Fukao Y, Sugioka H, Ito A, Shiobara H (2018) Ray tracing for dispersive tsunamis and source amplitude estimation based on Green's Law: Application to the 2015 Volcanic Tsunami Earthquake Near Torishima, South of Japan. Pure. Appl. Geophys. 175: 1371-1385. DOI: 10.1007/ s00024-017-1746-0 https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00024-017-1746-0
    Satake K, Bourgeois J, Abe K, Abke K, Tsuji Y, Imamura F, Lio Y, Katao H, Noguera E, Estrada F (1993) Tsunami field survey of the 1992 Nicaragua earthquake. EoS 74(13): 145-157. DOI: 10.1029/93EO00271
    Satake K, Fujii Y, Harada T, Namegaya Y (2013) Time and space distribution of coseismic slip of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake as inferred from tsunami waveform data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103(2B): 1473-1492. DOI: 10.1785/0120120122
    Sato M, Ishikawa T, Ujihara N, Yoshida S, Fujita M, Asada A (2011) Displacement above the hypocenter of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake. Science 332(6036): 1395. DOI: 10.1126/science. 1207401 https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1207401
    Sato S (1996) Numerical simulation of 1993 Southwest Hokkaido Earthquake Tsunami around Okushiri Island. J Waterw. Port, Coast. Ocean Eng. 122(5): 209-215. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1996)122:5(209)
    Sato S, Liu H, Takewaka S, Nobuoka H, Aoki S (2012) Tsunami damages of Nakoso Coast due to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. Proceedings of 33rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ICCE2012, Santander, Spain. DOI: 10.9753/icce.v33.currents.2
    Schimmels S, Sriram V, Didenkulova I (2016) Tsunami generation in a large scale experimental facility. Coastal Eng. 110: 32-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.12.005
    Shen J, Wei L, Wu D, Liu H, Huangfu J (2020) Spatiotemporal characteristics of the dam-break induced surge pressure on a vertical wall. Coastal Eng. J. 62(4): 566-581. DOI: 10.1080/ 21664250.2020.1828559 https://doi.org/ 10.1080/21664250.2020.1828559
    Shen J, Liu H (2022) On the structure dynamic response of a coastal structure subject to the dam break induced surge impact pressure. Coastal Eng. J. 64(2): 246-259. DOI: 10.1080/21664250.2021. 2006950 https://doi.org/ 10.1080/21664250.2021.2006950
    Shimozono T, Sato S, Okayasu Y, Tajima Y, Fritz HM, Liu H, Takagawa T (2012) Propagation and inundation characteristics of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami on the central Sanriku Coast. Coastal Eng. J. 54(1): 1250004. DOI: 10.1142/S0578563412500040
    Shuto N (1991) Numerical simulation of tsunamis – Its present and near future. Nat. Hazards 4: 171-191. DOI: 10.1007/BF00162786
    Simkin T, Fiske RS (1983) Krakatau 1883: the volcanic eruption and its effects. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
    Siripong A (2006) Andaman Seacoast of Thailand field survey after the December 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Earthquake Spectra 22(3_suppl. ): 187-202. DOI: 10.1193/1.2209927
    Sugawara D (2021) Numerical modeling of tsunami: advances and future challenges after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. Earth-Sci. Rev. 214: 103498. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103498
    Synolakis CE (1987) The runup of solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 185: 523-545. DOI: 10.1017/S002211208700329X
    Takagi H, Pratama MB, Kurobe S, Esteban M, Aranguiz R, Ke B (2019) Analysis of generation and arrival time of landslide tsunami to Palu City due to the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake. Landslides 16: 983-991. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01166-y
    Tappin DR, Grilli ST, Harris JC, Geller RJ, Masterlark T, Kirby JT, Shi F, Ma M, Thingbaijam KKS, Mai PM (2014) Did a submarine landslide contribute to the 2011 Tohoku tsunami? Mar. Geol. 357: 344-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2014.09.043
    Terry JP, Winspear N, Goff J, Tan PHH (2017) Past and potential tsunami sources in the South China Sea: A brief synthesis. Earth-Sci. Rev. 167: 47-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.02.007
    Titov V, Rabinovich AB, Mofjeld HO, Thomson RE, Gonzalez FI (2005) The global reach of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra tsunami. Science 309: 2045-2048. DOI: 10.1126/science.1114576
    Titov VV, Gonzalez FI (1997) Implementation and testing of the method of splitting tsunami (MOST) model. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-112, Contribution No. 1927 from NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
    Vilibić I, Rabinovich AB, Anderson EJ (2021) Special issue on the global perspective on meteotsunami science: editorial. Nat. Hazards 106: 1087-1104. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04679-9
    Wang G, Liang Q, Shi F, Zheng J (2021) Analytical and numerical investigation of trapped ocean waves along a submerged ridge. J. Fluid Mech. 915: A54. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.1039
    Wang X (2009) User manual for COMCOT version 1.7. Edited by Liu PLF, Woo SB, Cho YS, Computer Programs for Tsunami Propagation and Inundation, Cornel University
    Ward SN, Day S (2001) Cumbre Vieja Volcano–Potential collapse and tsunami at La Palma, Canary Islands. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28(17): 3397-3400. DOI: 10.1029/2001GL013110
    Wu D, Liu H (2022) Effects of the bed roughness and beach slope on the non-breaking solitary wave runup height. Coastal Eng. 174: 104122. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104122
    Wuthrich D, Pfister M, Nistor I, Schleiss AJ (2018) Experimental study of tsunami-like waves generated with a vertical release technique on dry and wet beds. J Waterw. Port, Coast. Ocean Eng. 144(4): 04018006. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000447
    Xie W, Shimozono T (2022) Water surge impingement onto a vertical wall: Laboratory experiments and stochastic analysis on impact pressure. Ocean Eng. 248: 110422. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110422
    Yamada M, Ho TC, Mori J, Nishikawa Y, Yamamoto M (2022) Tsunami triggered by the Lamb wave from the 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption and transition in the offshore Japan region. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49(15): 9. DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098752
    Yang M, Zheng Y, Liu H (2022) Experimental study of the solitary wave induced groundwater hydrodynamics. Coastal Eng. 177: 104193. DOI: 10.1007/s13344-019-0025-5
    Ye L, Kanamori H, Rivera L, Lay T, Zhou Y, Sianipar D, Satake K (2020) The 22 December 2018 tsunami from flank collapse of Anak Krakatau volcano during eruption. Sci. Adv. 6: eaaz1377. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1377
    Yeh H, Liu P, Briggs M, Synolakis C (1994) Propagation and amplification of tsunamis at coastal boundaries. Nature 372: 353-355. DOI: 10.1038/372353a0
    Yeh H, Chadha RK, Francis M, Katada T, Latha G, Peterson C, Raghuraman G, Singh JP (2006) Tsunami runup survey along the Southeast Indian Coast. Earthquake Spectra 22(3_suppl. ): 173-186. DOI: 10.1193/1.2202651
    Yeh H, Sato S, Tajima Y (2013) The 11 March 2011 East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: Tsunami effects on coastal infrastructure and buildings. Pure Appl. Geophys. 170: 1019-1031. DOI: 10.1007/ s00024-012-0489-1 https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00024-012-0489-1
    Yulianto E, Utari P, Satyawan IA (2020) Communication technology support in disaster-prone areas: Case study of earthquake, tsunami and liquefaction in Palu, Indonesia. Int. J. Disast. Risk Res. 45: 101457. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101457
    Zeng J, Liu H (2022) An approximate explicit analytical solution for the frictionless swash hydrodynamics with an improved seaward boundary condition. Coastal Eng. 174: 104127. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104127
    Zhao B, Duan W, Webster WC (2011) Tsunami simulation with Green–Naghdi theory. Coastal Eng. 38: 389-396. DOI: 10.1016/j. oceaneng.2010.11.008 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.11.008
    Zhang X, Niu X (2020) Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment and its application to southeast coast of Hainan Island from Manila Trench. Coastal Eng. 155: 103596. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng. 2019.103596 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103596
    Zhang Y, Liu H (2021) Spatiotemporal variation of wave energy induced by an accelerated moving atmospheric pressure disturbance. Coastal Eng. J. 63(1): 83-91. DOI: 10.1080/21664250. 2021.1875690 https://doi.org/ 10.1080/21664250.2021.1875690
    Zhang Y, Liu H (2022) Generation mechanisms of the water surface elevation induced by a moving atmospheric pressure disturbance. Ocean Eng. 255: 111469. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0291-0_19
    Zitellini N, Mendes LA, Cordoba D, Danobeitia J, Nicolich R, Ribeiro GPA, Sartori R, Torelli L, Bartolome R, Bortoluzzi G, Calafato A, Carrilho F, Casoni L, Chierici F, Corela C, Correggiari A, Delia Vedova B, Gracia E, Jornet P, Landuzzi M, Ligi M, Magagnoli A, Marozzi G, Matias L, Penitenti D, Rodriguez P, Rovere M, Terrinha P, Vigliotti L, Ruiz AZ (2001) Source of 1755 Lisbon Earthquake and Tsunami investigated. EoS 82(26): 285-296. DOI: 10.1029/EO082i026p00285-01
WeChat click to enlarge
Figures(4)  /  Tables(1)
Publishing history
  • Received:  15 August 2022
  • Accepted:  28 November 2022

目录

    /

    Return
    Return