f(G,T) Gravity with Cylindrically Symmetric Relativistic Fluids
Farasat Shamir M. *, Awais Sadiq M.
Department of Sciences and Humanities, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: farasat.shamir@nu.edu.pk awaismalhi007@gmail.com

Abstract
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the structure scalars with account of theory of gravity. We consider the cylindrically symmetric spacetime with dissipative anisotropic background. We have determined the structure scalars by orthogonally decomposing the Riemann curvature tensor and it is shown that these scalars are associated with fundamental properties of fluid. We further investigate the mass function along with the transport equation and discuss their role on the evolutionary stages of relativistic stellar systems. We have also analyzed these structure scalars for static fluid distributions and it is concluded that all possible solutions of field equations can be expressed through these scalars.

1 Introduction

As indicated by late perceptions, the expansion of universe is amongst the most stunning disclosure in this new age of astronomy. In order to examine the gravitational stellar framework, relativistic consequences must be taken into consideration. Neutron stars, hybrid stars, white dwarfs, black holes are lucid examples of relativistic stellar structures in which these effects have essential outcomes. So it is important to consider observationally applicable gravitational theories in order to study these systems. Further, numerous intriguing outcomes originating from observational elements of cosmic microwave background radiations and type Ia Supernova[13] have made an incredible revolution in the recent past, therefore opening a new platform for research. These observations exhibit that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. Recent results generating from the BICEP2 experiment,[46] the Planck satellite,[79] sloan digital sky surveys[10] and the wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe[1112] reveal that 68% of the universe comprises dark energy, while the dark and ordinary matter is 27% and 5% respectively. The dark energy contains a large amount of negative pressure and it is believed that this mysterious energy causes the expansion of our cosmos. It has also been proved that the dark energy causes accretion onto blackholes as well as wormholes.[13] Chattopadhyay et al.[14] studied the accretion of three holographic dark energies onto wormholes in modified gravity and concluded that when dark energies accrete on wormhole, it causes an increase in the mass of wormhole in the phantom phase of the universe. Some important modified gravitational theories are introduced in the recent two decades. These modified theories can well explain the dark energy issue. The modified gravity theories are introduced after generalizing the Einstein-Hilbert action to discuss the accelerating expansion of our universe. Nojiri and Odintsov[15] explained that how these theories of gravity are significant in investigating the evolutionary stages of our universe. The simplest gravity theory is f(R), which can be obtained by replacing f(R) with Ricci scalar in Einstein Hilbert action. Some important research related to modified gravitational theories can be seen in Refs. [1627].

Modified Guass-Bonnet gravity is another attractive gravitational theory which has grabbed importance over the recent couple of years and it is trusted that the astronomical expansion might be noticed in gravity due to the existence of de-Sitter point.[2832] The Guass-Bonnet four dimensional topological invariant provides information about the topology of the space-time manifold on which the theory is formulated.[33] Gauss-Bonnet invariant is strictly connected with the trace anomaly and may play an important role in the early time expansion of the universe. The remarkable quality of this theory is that the Gauss-Bonnet term plays an essential part as it may ignore ghost contributions and regularize the gravitational action.[34] Nojiri and Odintsov[35] clarified that the cosmological order of matter dominance deceleration-acceleration transformation and accelerating stage could appear in modified gravity. A further generalized theory that has gained prominence over recent couple of years is theory of gravity where f is generic function of Gauss-Bonnet topological invariant and T the trace of stress energy tensor.[27] Shamir and Ahmad[36] explored some exact solutions through Noether symmetry approach and used anisotropic distributions to explore cosmological models in gravity. Some interesting work has been done recently in this theory in different contexts.[3739]

The orthogonal decomposition of curvature tensor was first introduced by Bel.[40] Gomez-Lobo[41] carried out the orthogonal splitting of Bel and Bel-Robinson tensor and also obtained the particular canonical forms valid for some Petrov types by expressing the orthogonal decomposition in terms of electric and magnetic parts of Weyl tensor. Herrera et al.[42] used this idea to build up a connection between structure scalars and fundamental properties of fluid. Herrera and his collaborators[43] analyzed the physical meaning of the scalars functions for charged spherical fluids. Herrera et al.[43] found the structure scalars for cylindrically symmetric relativistic fluids and also obtained the solutions to Einstein equations with static anisotropic cylindrical symmetry. Sharif and Yousaf[44] discussed structure scalars for cylindrically self gravitating system in f(R) gravity. Yousaf et al.[45] studied the influence of f(R, T) gravity on the dynamics of radiating spherical fluids and concluded that the evolutionary stages of relativistic stellar systems could be explored with the help of modified structure scalars. Recently, we[46] investigated the structure scalars in the context of theory of gravity to analyze the evolutionary phases of compact objects. The cylindrical symmetry is the next closest approach to nature after spherical symmetry. In fact cylindrical solutions are related to cosmic strings and the family of solutions with constant Ricci scalar in f(R) gravity are associated with a cosmic string.[47] Moreover, in Horava-Lifshitz gravity static cylindrically symmetric solutions describe cosmic string as a special case.[48] Houndjo et al.[49] explored the cylindrically symmetric solutions in f(T) gravity, it was found that the solution metric is similar to Levi-Civita spacetime with mass parameter having both positive and negative values and for a special case the spacetime is conical with a deficit angle corresponding to an exterior metric of a cosmic string. Thus it looks an interesting task to further explore the cylindrical symmetry and role of structure scalars in the context of modified gravity.

The main purpose of this work is to investigate the impacts of fluid variables and corrections on the structure and evolution of radiating cylindrical compact object. The motivation to attempt this work is to understand the physical significance of scalar quantities and how these scalar functions play an important role in exploring the evolutionary behaviors of compact objects in the presence of modified gravity. The plan of paper is as follows: In Sec. 2, we develop the modified field equations for non-radiating cylindrically symmetric spacetime with anisotropic fluid distribution. Modified scalar functions as well as conservation equations are constructed in Sec. 3. Section 4 contains the formulations of mass function and transport equation. Static anisotropic cylinders and their solutions are demonstrated in Sec. 5. The conclusion of the work is presented in the last section.

2 Radiating Anisotropic Fluid Cylinders

Modified Gauss-Bonnet theories of gravity have a wide space to explore new results and making better approaches to deal with different issues. It has been demonstrated that modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity has numerous favorable advantages when contrasted with other gravitational theories.[32] In addition, the modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity is very intriguing to explain the astronomical acceleration of universe with more freedom and instabilities do not exist in this theory. Specifically, the recently presented gravity has picked up prominence because of the addition of matter content alongside Gauss-Bonnet invariant in the shape of a bivariate function. The general action for gravity is defined as[27, 46]
where R is the Ricci scalar, indicates the Lagrangian coupled with matter, g is the determinant of metric tensor, and κ represents the coupling constant. Variation of action (1) with respect to metric tensor gives the following field equations[27,46]
where
and Θαβ can be found as follows
The covariant divergence of Eq. (2) is given as
We consider a non-static collapsing cylinder coupled with dissipative and anisotropic fluid distribution. Moreover, we assume that the fluid configuration is bounded by a timelike cylindrical surface Σ. Thus, the mathematical expression of energy momentum tensor is given by
where μ indicates the energy density, P signifies the principle pressure,
and qα = qLα is the heat flux. The energy momentum tensor can be written in an alternative form as
where PzPr ≡ Πs, PφPr ≡ Πk, and P ≡ (Pr + Pz + Pφ)/3. We further consider a non-static cylindrically symmetric spacetime
composed of radiating anisotropic fluid configuration. To indicate cylindrical symmetry, we implement the following constraints on the coordinates
where we consider C = 0 at r = 0, which signifies non singular axis. The four vectors , , , satisfy
The non zero components of field equations using spacetime (7) are given as




where ψ00, ψ01, ψ11, ψ22, and ψ33 are mentioned in Appendix A. The shear σα β, expansion Θ, and four acceleration aα of the fluid are given by[50]
Using line element (7) and Eq. (14), we obtain

where primes and dots represent partial derivatives with respect to r and t respectively. We can also signify the shear tensor in another form as
where

The four acceleration of the fluid is given as
The usual components of Weyl tensor can be decomposed in magnetic and electric parts. In contrast to the spherically symmetric case, the magnetic component of Weyl tensor does not vanish. The magnetic and electric parts of Weyl tensor are defined as
where ηανϵρ is the Levi-Civita tensor. The electric and magnetic parts of Weyl tensor can be rewritten as
where

where C0101, C0202, C0303, and C0313 are given in Appendix B.

3 Modified Structure Scalars

We orthogonally split the Riemann curvature tensor in order to develop the formalism for structure scalars. We get three tensors Xαβ, Yαβ, and Zαβ by the decomposition of curvature tensor which further divide into their trace and trace-free components i.e., XT, Xs, Xk, YT, Ys, Yk, ZH, and Zq also known as structure scalars. The tensors are defined as[42]
where
Now writing these tensors by means of matter variables and the magnetic and electric components of Weyl tensor,[51] we get


The above tensors can be written as their trace and traceless parts. Using Eqs. (9)–(13), (23), and (24), we obtain







This shows that these scalars functions, which are eight in number are related to modelling of collapsing celestial body in gravity. The expression of covariant derivative of effective stress energy tensor for gravity is defined as Eq. (4), which would give two equations of motion in theory. Making use of Gαβ;β = 0 and Eqs. (9)–(13) with α = 0, 1, Eq. (4) gives

where D0, D1 are the dark source variables, given in Appendix B and the operators are defined as and . Some important equations which are necessary to discuss the dynamics of relativistic cylindrical geometry can be acquired by using Eqs. (9)–(13) and Eqs. (37)–(46). Herrera et al.[51] determined these equations in general relativity and these equations were also computed by Sharif and Yousaf[44] in f(R) gravity. The corresponding relations in gravity are

The above two equations relates structure scalars Ys, Yk, Xs, Xk with energy density inhomogeneity and consequently present a definition of inhomogeneity factor in terms of some scalar functions. These equations give a relationship between extra curvature terms, fluid parameters and structure scalars.

4 Dynamical and Transport Equations, Mass Function and Gravity

The selection of model holds great importance to investigate a number of obscure features of gravitational physics. One can choose different models for further exploration. However, we have chosen the following model for the sake of simplicity[46]
with and f2(T) = λ T, α and λ being arbitrary real numbers. The four-velocity U of collapsing cylindrical system can be acquired by varying the areal radius with respect to proper time.
Using Eqs. (11) and (41), we get
This equation can be organized in form of Rieman curvature tensor as
where R0202 and R2323 are given in Appendix B. Substituting the value of a from the above equation in Eq. (38), we have
where D3 represents the dark source variables merged with corrections. The above equation contains four types of terms. The terms on the left side are the product of inertial mass (density) and proper time derivative of fluid velocity U. There are three different terms on the right side. The first term exemplifies impacts of gravitational force. The second one incorporates hydrodynamics force because it includes pressure gradient with anisotropic distributions, while the third term represents the dissipative process. Thus, the above equation has the Newtonian form
Now we continue to analyze mass function with cylindrically symmetric distributions in gravity. For this motive, we write R0202/A2R2323/C2 in terms of scalar functions.
Using Eqs. (29)–(34), we have
Making use of the above equation, we obtain
In order to characterize the mass function, we apply the general relativity procedure given in Ref. [52]. We further suppose that pressure impact remains the same as in spherically symmetric case, which gives the conceivable generalization of Misner-Sharp mass function for cylindrically symmetric system with configurations and is given as
Using Eqs. (30), (31), (33), and (34), the above expression can be written as

The alternate form of mass function with reference to structure scalars can be found by using Eqs. (30), (31), (33), (34), (38), and (40) as follows
Using Eqs. (50) and (51), is follows that
Now applying the operator † on the above equation and using Eq. (52), we get
Taking integral on both sides of above equation, it leads to
where ζ is an arbitrary integration function. Equation (55) shows that the mass function is influenced by dark source variables, scalar functions and other physical factors. Substituting the values of Ys, Yk, Xs, and Xk in Eq. (55), we have
This shows that the Weyl tensor, shear, expansion, anisotropic pressure, dissipative fluid and modified scalar functions influence the presence of mass of relativistic cylindrical body with configurations. The above equation portrays the role of modified structure scalars in refining the dissipative cylindrical relativistic framework.

The investigation of radiating factors in fluid configurations possesses tempting interest in the analysis of collapsing event of astronomical objects. Herrera et al.[53] analyzed the impacts of thermal conductivity in spherically symmetric configurations of collapsing fluid with anisotropic background. In another context, Herrera et al.[54] discussed the thermo-inertial bouncing of self gravitating collapsing sphere through numerical procedure and showed that these bouncing effects are due to decreasing inertial mass density of the transport equation. Next we consider the transport equation which is given by[55]
where τ, ξ, and K represent relaxation time, thermal conductivity and temperature respectively. The only non zero component is
Using Eqs. (49) and (58) in Eq. (45), we get
The above equation can be rewritten as
where

The product of Fgrav and in Eq. (60) indicates that the gravitational attraction on dissipative relativistic fluid decreases by the same factor as effective mass density. It can be observed from Eq. (60) when , the inertial mass (density) approaches to zero. This demonstrates that the inertial force and matter would not encounter a gravitational attraction, which is the source of collapse. The inertial mass density decreases when while signifies the increase of inertial mass density. There should be increase or decrease of mass by the equivalence principle. In this way, it is easy to differentiate between expanding and collapsing system all along the dynamics of dissipative procedure.

If we assume that the collapsing cylinder alter in such a way that the value of increases and approaches to 1 for some region of cylinder, then during this process the gravitational force decreases and this would cause the change of sign of the right hand side of Eq. (60). Since this would occur for small values of effective inertial mass density and this implies a strong bouncing of that region of cylinder, even for a small value of right hand side of Eq. (60). This event causes dissipation of energy from the framework and henceforth the collapsing cylinder with non adiabatic source causes the discharge of gravitational radiations.

5 Static Anisotropic Cylinders

In this section, we will discuss the possible static solutions of field equations. The field equations (9)–(13) in static case are



where tilde represents that ψ00, ψ11, ψ22, and ψ33 are evaluated for static cylindrical case. Let us introduce some auxiliary variables, , and . The above equations in terms of auxiliary entities can be written as



The scalars Es and Ek in terms of auxiliary variables are

If we add Eqs. (65)–(68), we get one of the structure scalars which is
From Eqs. (66)–(68), it follows that


Making use of Eqs. (30), (31), (69), (70), (72), and (73), we get

Integration of Eq. (75) yields
where ζ1 is a constant. Equation (77) implies that for any Ys, we get a link between A and B,
Next, Integrating Eq. (76)
where ζ2 is another constant. Equation (79) gives the relationship between A and C for any Yk,
Thus, from Eqs. (78) and (80) we can express any of the auxiliary variable in terms of the others. Subsequently in Eq. (74), we can indicate ϑ2 and ϑ3 in terms of ϑ1. It can be solved for PφPz and once we get ϑ1, we can obtain ϑ2 and ϑ3 from Eqs. (78) and (80). Equations (31) and (34) provide
Equations (30) and (33) give
This shows that any static anisotropic solution can be found via triplet of structure scalars (Ys, Yk, Xs) or (Ys, Yk, Xk).

6 Conclusion

In this paper, the structure and evolution of radiating cylindrical compact objects have been investigated by taking gravity into account. For this purpose, non-static cylindrically symmetric spacetime coupled with radiating anisotropic fluid distribution is considered. We have constructed modified structure scalars by orthogonally splitting the Riemann curvature tensor from the generic formula of scalar functions. We have also linked Weyl scalar with matter variables for usual and effective matter distributions. We have formulated dynamical and transport equations to analyze the impacts of relaxation time for the cylindrical collapsing system. Further, we have explored the role of structure scalars for anisotropic cylindrical solutions.

(i) We have defined the set of eight structure scalars (YT, Ys, Yk, XT, Xs, Xk, ZH, Zq) together with scalars (σs, σk) interpreting the shear tensor and Weyl scalars (Es, Ek, H) which are necessary for dynamical analysis of cylindrically symmetric gravitating object. We have also determined a set of equations administering the structure and evolution of the framework and yielded the role of scalar functions in those equations.

(ii) The scalar functions Zq, ZH, XT describe heat radiation, energy density and magnetic part curvature impacts emerging from Weyl tensor alongside dark source terms of dissipative anisotropic cylindrical distribution.

(iii) The structure scalars Ys, Yk, and YT control the evolution of shear and expansion in the dynamical stages of compact objects. We have computed these scalar functions with corrections and found that the dark source variables interrupt the role played by these scalars in evolution of celestial system.

(iv) In Eq. (56), the role of Weyl tensor and fluid parameters in affecting the existence of mass of cylindrical self gravitating body is shown. The mass function explains the contribution of modified scalar functions in developing the cylindrical dissipative self gravitating system. Additionally higher curvature terms attempts to make mass function more complex due to its non attractive nature.

(v) In the case of static cylinders, we have determined that all possible solutions of static field equations can be represented in terms of a triplet of scalar functions (Ys, Yk, Xs) or (Ys, Yk, Xk).

The above investigation provides dynamical behaviour of self gravitating cylindrical system with model. The acquired results may correspond to cosmological inflation where extra curvature variables emerge into dynamics.

Reference
[1] Giannantonio T. et al. Phys. Rev. D 74 2006 063520
[2] Riess A. G. et al. Astrophys. J. 659 2007 98
[3] Pietrobon D. Balbi A. Marinucci D. Phys. Rev. D 74 2006 043524
[4] Ade P. A. R. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 2014 241101
[5] Ade P. A. R. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 2015 101301
[6] Ade P. A. R. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 2016 031302
[7] Ade P. A. R. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 571 2014 A1
[8] Ade P. A. R. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 594 2016 A13
[9] Ade P. A. R. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 594 2016 A20
[10] Tegmark M. et al. Phys. Rev. D 69 2004 103501
[11] Komatsu E. et al. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 192 2011 18
[12] Hinshaw G. et al. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 208 2013 19
[13] Moruno P. M. Phys. Lett. B 685 2008 40
[14] Chattopadhyay S. Momeni D. Altaibayeva A. Myrzaulov R. Astrophys. Space Sci. 356 2015 195
[15] Nojiri S. Odintsov S. D. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 4 2007 115
[16] Starobinsky A. A. J. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 86 2009 157
[17] Appleby S. Battye R. Starobinsky A. A. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 2010 005
[18] Capozziello S. De-Filippis E. Salzano V. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 394 2009 947
[19] Bamba K. Capozziella S. Nojiri S. Odintsov S. D. Astrophys. Space Sci. 342 2012 155
[20] Nojiri S. Odintsov S. D. Problems of Modern Theoretical Physics, A Volume in Honour of Prof. Buchbinder, I. L. in the occasion of his 60th birthday 2008 266 285 TSPU Publishing Tomsk arXiv:hep-th/0807.0685
[21] Nojiri S. Odintsov S. D. Phys. Lett. 599 2004 137
[22] Akbar M. Cai R. Phys. Lett. B 648 2007 243
[23] Cai R. Liu Y. Sun Y. J. High Energy Phys. 0910 2009 080
[24] Harko T. Lobo F. S. N. Nojiri S Odintsov S. D. Phys. Rev. D 84 2011 024020
[25] Capozziello S. Martin-Moruno P. Rubano C. Phys. Lett. B 664 2008 12
[26] Felice A. D. Tsujikaswa S. Living Rev. Rel. 13 2010 3
[27] Sharif M. Ikram A. Eur. Phys. J. C 76 2016 640
[28] Cognola G. Elizalde E. Nojiri S. et al. Phys. Rev. D 73 2006 084007
[29] Cognola G. Elizalde E. Nojiri S. et al. Phys. Rev. D 77 2008 046009
[30] Elizalde E. Myrzakulov R. Obukhov V. V. Saez-Gomez D. Classical Quant. Grav. 27 2010 095007
[31] Cognola G. Elizalde E. Nojiri S. et al. Eur. Phys. J. C 64 2009 483
[32] Nojiri S. Odintsov S. D. Phys. Lett. B 631 2005 1
[33] Capozziello S. Laurentis M. D. Phys. Rept. 509 2011 167
[34] Chiba T. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 2005 008
[35] Nojiri S. Odintsov S. D. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 66 2007 012005
[36] Shamir M. F. Ahmad M. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32 2017 1750086
[37] Shamir M. F. Ahmad M. Eur. Phys. J. C 77 2017 674
[38] Shamir M. F. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017 2017 6378904
[39] Bhatti M. Z. Sharif M. Yousaf Z. Ilyas M. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 2018 1850044
[40] Bel L. Ann. Inst. H. Poincare 17 1961 37
[41] Gomez-Lobo A. G. P. Classical Quant. Grav. 25 2008 015006
[42] Herrera L. Ospino J. Di Prisco A. et al. Phys. Rev. D 79 2009 064025
[43] Herrera L. Di Prisco A. Ibanez J. J. Phys. Rev. D 84 2011 107501
[44] Sharif M. Yousaf Z. Astrophys Space Sci. 357 2015 49
[45] Yousaf Z. Bamba K. Bhatti M. Z. Phys. Rev. D 93 2016 064059
[46] Shamir M. F. Sadiq M. A. Eur. Phys. J. C 78 2018 279
[47] Azadi A. Momeni D. Nouri-Zonoz M. Phys. Lett. B 670 2008 210
[48] Momeni D. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50 2011 1493
[49] Houndjo M. J. S. Momeni D. Myrzakulov R. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 21 2012 1250093
[50] Herrera L. Prisco A. D. Ospino J. Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 2010 1585
[51] Herrera L. Di Prisco A. Ospino J. Gen. Rel. Grav. 44 2012 2645
[52] Di Prisco A. Herrera L. Le Denmat G. et al. Phys. Rev. D 76 2007 064017
[53] Herrera L. Di Prisco A. Hernandez-Pastora J. L. et al. Classical Quant. Grav. 14 1997 2239
[54] Herrera L. Di Prisco A. Barreto W. Phys. Rev. D 73 2006 024008
[55] Israel W. Ann. Phys. 100 1976 310