Phase Properties of Photon-Added Coherent States for Nonharmonic Oscillators in a Nonlinear Kerr Medium
Jahanbakhsh F., Honarasa G. *
Department of Physics, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: honarasa@sutech.ac.ir

Abstract
Abstract

The potential of nonharmonic systems has several applications in the field of quantum physics. The photon-added coherent states for annharmonic oscillators in a nonlinear Kerr medium can be used to describe some quantum systems. In this paper, the phase properties of these states including number-phase Wigner distribution function, Pegg-Barnett phase distribution function, number-phase squeezing and number-phase entropic uncertainty relations are investigated. It is found that these states can be considered as the nonclassical states.

PACS: ;03.65.-w;;42.50.-p;
1 Introduction

The standard coherent state is a particular kind of the quantum states, which its dynamics is similar to oscillatory behavior of a classical harmonic oscillator.[1] These states are defined by the annihilation and creation operators of the harmonic oscillator. Some quantum mechanical systems can be described by the nonharmonic potentials.[23] The Gazeau-Klauder coherent state of the anharmonic oscillator has been introduced by Roy.[4] Also, the coherent states for nonharmonic oscillators using generalized Heisenberg algebra have been constructed.[5]

Construction and generation of the nonclassical states is one of the most exciting subjects in quantum optics because their applications in the fields of quantum information processing and quantum computation. Therefore, with the aim of finding nonclassical states many generalizations on the standard coherent states have been nominated. One of the most important generalizations is the photon-added coherent states.[6] The photon-added coherent states can be considered as the nonlinear coherent states with certain nonlinearity function.[7] Also, the photon-subtracted and photon-added coherent states corresponding to the inverse bosonic operators have been introduced in 2004.[8] Furthermore, Zavatta et al. produced the single photon-added coherent state |α, 1⟩ experimentally in 2005.[9] A method for generating the two photon-added coherent state |α,2⟩ has been suggested by Kalamidas et al.[10] The photon-added coherent states and their generalizations have received considerable attention in recent years.[1114] Roman-Ancheyta et al. constructed deformed Photon-added nonlinear coherent states for a one-mode field in a Kerr medium.[15]

Recently, the photon-added coherent states for nonharmonic oscillators in a nonlinear Kerr medium have been introduced by Al-Rajhi using generalized Heisenberg algebra.[16] In the present paper, the phase properties as well as the number-phase entropic uncertainty relation of these states are investigated. For these purpose, the photon-added coherent states for nonharmonic oscillators are reviewed in Sec. 2. The Wigner distribution function corresponding to these states is investigated in Sec. 3. Then their Pegg-Barnett phase distribution function is studied in Sec. 4. Also the number-phase squeezing is discussed in Sec. 5. Finally, the number-phase entropic uncertainty relation of these states is investigated in Sec. 6.

2 Photon-Added Coherent States for Anharmonic Oscillators

The Hamiltonian for anharmonic oscillators can be expressed by[4]

where χ is the coupling constant corresponding to nonlinear susceptibility χ(3) of the Kerr medium. Here a (a) is the bosonic annihilation (creation) operator. This Hamiltonian describes a one-mode field of frequency ω in a Kerr medium with anharmonicity parameter χ and obeys the equation

with following eigenvalues

Analogous to the standard photon-added coherent states,[6] the m photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators in a nonlinear Kerr medium are defined as[16]

where

is the generalized coherent state for anharmonic oscillators and A is the generalized creating operator of the generalized Heisenberg algebra.[16] Finally, the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators can be expressed as follows:[16]

where the normalization constant Nm(|z|2) is obtained as

3 Number-Phase Wigner Function

The number-phase Wigner function characterizes the quantum statistics of the photons and phase observable of a quantum state. This distribution function may be negative in some regions of number-phase space for specific quantum states that represents the nonclassical signature of these states. The number-phase Wigner operator can be expressed as follows:[1718]

where n = 0, 1, 2, 3, . . . and θ is a real value parameter. The second sentence in the bracket considered to be zero for n = 0. Then number-phase Wigner function for a state is defined as the expectation value of the number-phase Wigner operator. The number-phase Wigner function associated with the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators may be defined as

Finally, by using the state (6) in (9), leads to

In Fig. 1, the number-phase Wigner distribution function has been plotted versus two new variable x = n cos(θ) and y = n sin(θ) for different values of photon added number m. The figure is drawn as curves of constant integer n (concentric rings) crossed by curves of constant θ (radial lines). It is clear that the Wigner function is negative in some regions for all values of m and this represents these states are nonclassical states.

Fig. 1 Plot of the number-phase Wigner function associated with the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators with |z| = 1 and μ = 1 for (a) m = 0, (b) m = 1, (c) m = 3 and (d) m = 5.
4 Pegg-Barnett Phase Distribution Function

Based on Pegg-Barnett method, a complete set of s + 1 dimension phase state are well-defined by[19]

where θP is obtained by

with θ0 is an arbitrary value. Also, the Hermitian phase operator corresponding to the phase state (11) is given by

The Pegg-Barnett phase distribution function of the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators in a nonlinear Kerr medium may be defined as

So, by using (6) and (11) in (14), the Pegg-Barnett phase distribution function P(θ) is obtained as follows

By separating the sentences related to n = l and nl, the following relation for phase distribution function can be obtained

Figure 2 shows the Pegg-Barnett phase distribution function of the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators against θ for different values of m. The curves in this figure show there is only a single peak at θ = 0. Furthermore, the distribution function has higher and sharper peak for greater values of photon added number m and thus, it is more localized with respect to θ.

Fig. 2 Pegg-Barnett phase distribution function associated with the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators versus θ with |z| = 2 and μ = 2 for m = 1 (solid curve), m = 3 (dashed curve) and m = 5 (dot-dashed curve).
5 Number-Phase Squeezing

The phase and number operators are conjugate to each other and consequently, satisfy the following uncertainty relation

The displacement relation between these operators is given by [n, ϕθ] = i[1 – 2πP(θ)].[19] The phase and number variances associated with the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators are given by

whenever ⟨(Δn)2⟩ < 1/2|⟨[n,ϕθ]⟩| or ⟨(Δϕθ)2⟩ < 1/2 × |⟨[n, ϕθ]⟩|, the squeezing happens in the number or phase operator, respectively. In order to investigate the squeezing in number or phase operator, the following parameters are defined

If Sn < 0 (Sϕ < 0), the corresponding state is the number (phase) squeezed.

The number and phase squeezing parameters associated with these states are shown in Fig. 3 for different values of m. It can be seen from the figure as |z| increases, squeezing parameters Sn (solid curve) and Sϕ (dotted curve) are increased and decreased, respectively and so they have opposite behavior. For small values of |z|, squeezing in number operator and for large values of |z|, squeezing in phase operator is observed. Also, there is a region with no squeezing. For example in Fig. 3(b) with m = 1, as |z| becomes smaller than 0.802, Sn is negative that shows the squeezing is occurred in numbers operator. Also, for |z| ≳ 1.177, Sϕ < 0, and Sn > 0 that indicates the squeezing is happened in phase operator. The squeezing is not occurred in 0.802 ≲ |z| ≲ 1.177. As m increases, the region with no squeezing is decreased.

Fig. 3 Plot of the number and phase squeezing associated with the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators versus |z| with μ = 1 for (a) m = 0, (b) m = 1, (c) m = 3, and (d) m = 5.
6 Number-phase Entropic Uncertainty Relations

The Shannon entropies (SA and SB) of two conjugate operators A and B, with eigenvalue equations A|an⟩ = an|an⟩ and B|bn⟩ = bn|an⟩, are limited by the entropy uncertainty relation SA + SB ≥ ln(s + 1). Here A and B are defined on the (s + 1)-dimensional space. This uncertainty relation which has been suggested by Kraus[20] and then proven by Massen and Uffink,[21] depends on dimension of the state space. Vaccaro et al. defined new quantities RA and RB as follows

where δa and δb represent the differences between the eigenvalues corresponding to operators A and B, respectively. Using RA and RA instead of SA and SB a new form of entropic uncertainty relation can be obtained as RA + RB ≥ ln(2π).[22] The general conjugate operators A and B can be replaced with ϕθ and n operators by selecting δa = 2π/s + 1 and δb = 1. So, the entropic uncertainty relation for phase and number operators is as follows[23]

Now, the number-phase entropic uncertainty relation associated with photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators in nonlinear Kerr medium is considerable. In the infinite s limit, the Rϕ is given by[2223]

where Pm(θ) is the phase distribution function obtained in Eq. (15). Also, the photon number entropy for introduced states is defined as

Finally, by using (6) in (25) the following expression for photon number entropy of photon-added coherent states associated with anharmonic oscillators can be obtained

In Fig. 4, Rϕ, Rn and their sum have been depicted versus |z| for photon-added coherent states corresponding to anharmonic oscillators with m = 1. The figure shows that Rn increases while Rϕ decreases with increasing z. It can be observed that their sum according to Eq. (23) has a lower bound ln(2π). Also, because of the vacuum is an eigenstate of the number operator, the sum Rn + Rϕ is exactly ln(2π) at z = 0.

Fig. 4 Plots of Rn (solid curve), Rϕ (dashed curve) and their sum (dot-dashed curve) versus |z| associate with the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators in a Kerr medium with μ = 1 and m = 1.
7 Summary and Conclusion

The phase and number properties of physical systems are very important. In this work, the number-phase Wigner function, phase distribution function, number-phase squeezing and number-phase entropic uncertainty relation of the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators are studied using Pegg-Barnett formalism. The number-phase Wigner function corresponding to these generalized coherent states is negative in some regions. The results show also that these states represent number or phase squeezing for different ranges of |z|. Therefore, these states are nonclassical states. The photon-added coherent state for anharmonic oscillators can be considered as an intermediate state between the coherent states for anharmonic oscillators and the Fock states. Construction of a photon-added coherent state for anharmonic oscillators by adding photon to the coherent state for anharmonic oscillators is a proper way to have a quantum state with more nonclassicality. The curves of Pegg-Barnett phase distribution function show that this distribution function has only a single peak in θ = 0 and as m increases, the peak is more localized with respect to θ. Finally, it is found that the number-phase entropic uncertainty relation associated with the photon-added coherent states for anharmonic oscillators has a lower bound ln(2π) for all values of photon added number m.

Reference
[1] Schrodinger E. Naturwissenschaften 14 1926 664
[2] Iqbal S. Phys. Lett. A 356 2006 231
[3] Robinett R. W. J. Math. Phys. 41 2000 1801
[4] Roy P. Opt. Commun. 221 2003 145
[5] Al-Rajhi M. A. Abdel-Khalek S. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54 2015 1470
[6] Agarwal G. Tara K. Phys. Rev. A 43 1991 492
[7] Sivakumar S. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 1999 3441
[8] Naderi M. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 2004 3225
[9] Zavatta A. Viciani S. Bellini M. Phys. Rev. A 72 2005 023820
[10] Kalamidas D. Gerry C. C. Benmoussa A. Phys. Lett. A 372 2008 1937
[11] Berrada K. J. Math. Phys. 56 2015 072104
[12] Yuan H. C. Xu X. X. Fan H. Y. Chin. Phys. B 19 2010 104205
[13] Popov D. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 2002 7205
[14] Hounkonnou M. N. Ngompe Nkouankam E. B. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 2009 025206
[15] Román-Ancheyta R. González Gutiérrez C. Récamier J. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31 2014 38
[16] Al-Rajhi M. A. Modern. Phys. Lett. B 29 2015 1550035
[17] Vaccaro J. Phys. Rev. A 52 1995 3474
[18] Vaccaro J. A. Opt. Commun. 113 1995 421
[19] Pegg D. Barnett S. Phys. Rev. A 39 1989 1665
[20] Kraus K. Phys. Rev. D 35 1987 3070
[21] Maassen H. Uffink J. B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1988 1103
[22] Gonzalez A. R. Vaccaro J. A. Barnett S. M. Phys. Lett. A 205 1995 247
[23] Honarasa G. R. Tavassoly M. K. Hatami M. Phys. Lett. A 373 2009 3931