Higher-Order Corrections to Earthʼs Ionosphere Shocks
Abdelwahed H.G.1, 2, †, El-Shewy E.K.2
Plasma Technology and Material Science Unit (PTMSU), Physics Department, College of Science and Humanitarian Studies, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, KSA
Theoretical Physics Group, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: hgomaa_eg@yahoo.com; hgomaa_eg@mans.edu.eg

Supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University under the Research Project No. 2015/01/4787

Abstract
Abstract

Nonlinear shock wave structures in unmagnetized collisionless viscous plasmas composed fluid of positive (negative) ions and nonthermally electron distribution are examined. For ion shock formation, a reductive perturbation technique applied to derive Burgers equation for lowest-order potential. As the shock amplitude decreasing or enlarging, its steepness and velocity deviate from Burger equation. Burgers type equation with higher order dissipation must be obtained to avoid this deviation. Solution for the compined two equations has been derived using renormalization analysis. Effects of higher-order, positive- negative mass ratio Q, electron nonthermal parameter δ and kinematic viscosities coefficient of positive (negative) ions and on the electrostatic shocks in Earth’s ionosphere are also argued.

1 Introduction

Research on ion-acoustic waves (IAWs) in ion pair plasmas has gained considerable amount of momentum over the last few years.[12] Positive-negative ion have been observed in many astrophysical environments.[3] More specifically, Negative ions are present in D-region altitudes of the ionosphere of Earth in coexistence with electrons as they are formed primarily by electron added to electronegative species.[4] In last few years, ion solitary waves in ion-pair plasmas investigated both numerically and experimentally.[56] In past, the nonthermal particles observed in many space environments.[79] However, several theoretical studies on nonlinear waves show that, electrons and ions non-thermal distributions are convenient in analyzing observation data in space plasma.[712] Cairns et al.[9] discussed the nonthermal electron effect on the ion acoustic wave existence. Elwakil et al.[2] inspected ion acoustic modulation instability characteristics in plasma having nonthermal electronsand positive-negative ions. It is reported that, the instability conditions affected by nonthermal electron parameter in D and F regions in Earth’s ionosphere. Gill et al.[13] investigated rarefactive and compressive soliton properties in two polarized ions plasma. Recently, nonthermality effect of positron-electron have been examined on the properties of improved compressive-rarefactive solitons generated in warm ion plasma.[14] On the other hand, there are many theoretical methods for studying nonlinear properties in plasma physics. Reductive perturbation analysis (RPT) aim to study the propagation of small wave amplitude.[15] As the wave amplitude enlarge, the solitary profile sidetrack from the nonlinear equation. In order to beat this deviation, the amplitude modulation of electrostatic nonlinear waves has been studied by many investigators.[1619] Kalejahi et al.[19] discussed the higher order nonlinear effects in a relativistic plasma. Abdelwahed and El-Shewy[16] improved the soliton shape of solitary wave directly by using algebraic analysis for solving the field equations. Chatterjee et al.[17] examined the region of solitary wave existence in nonthermal ions plasma. They discussed the effect of nonthermal ions and electron density on the properties of obtained dressed form. Accordingly, to improve the description of experimental data, the effect of fluctuation of charge of dusty plasma on the dressed nonlinear soliton waves has been investigated.[20] On the other hand, dusty size effect on the dressed soliton like wave amplitude and energy have been discussed in dust plasma containing dust grains and nonthermal ions.[21] Physically, some phenomenon like kinematic viscosity, collisions between plasma components and Landau damping are responsible for shocks formation in Earth ionosphere.[2224] The shock wave existence and propagation have been investigated experimentally and theoretically.[2531] Cairns et al.[32] investigated laminar ion shocks to explain observations on ion acceleration laser plasmas. Abdelwahed[33] obtained the higher order dissipation in terms of Burger-type equation to modulate the broadband auroral electrostatic shock noise. From theoretical point of view, Kadomtsev–Petviashvili–Burgers (KPB) equation has been derived by Hussain et al.[34] They discussed the diffraction and dissipation effects on the shock wave structures in epi plasma with kappa distributed positrons and electrons. More specifically, the obliqueness of solitary shocks in a magnetized viscous plasma have been studied.[35] Abdelwahed and el-Shewy[36] studied the nonlinear features of rational and double layer ion acoustic solitary solutions. Furthermore, Masood and Rizvi[37] investigated the viscosity effect of negative and positive ions in dissipative plasma medium in a planar geometry. Also, kinematic viscosity effect on formation of shock waves in asymmetric pair ion plasmas has been examined.[38] It was noted that, kinematic viscosity enhances the amplitude of shock profile. In this study, the higher-order acoustic shock modulation in plasmas with negative-positive ions and nonthermal electrons have been considered. In Sec. 2, the equations of the system is presented, and higher-order Burgers equation is derived in Sec. 3. In Sec. 4, the solutions of the higher-order Burgers-equation are presented. Finally, the results and discussion are recapitulated in Sec. 5.

2 Basic Equations

A system of three collisionless unmagnetized plasmas components having viscous fluid of positive (+) and negative (−) ion and nonthermally electron distribution. The normalized equations are given by:

ne is the electrons density obey nonthermally distributed.[9]

where δ is the electron nonthermality parameter and is the unperturbed electron to positive ion ratio. In Eqs. (1)–(5), is positive (negative) ionic density (normalized by , is positive (negative) ion fluid velocity normalized by the ion sound speed

and ϕ is electrostatic wave potential (normalized by ). is space (time) coordinate, x is normalized to Debye length of hot electron

t normalized by inverse of plasma frequency of cold electron

where KB is the Boltzmann constant. Te is the electron temperature, , and the Q (mass ratio) , where and are positive and negative ion masses, respectively. Also, is ionic charge number. The positive (negative) kinematic viscosity () are normalized by and . The neutrality condition implies:

for simplicity we shall consider ().

2.1 Nonlinear Calculations

The slow stretched co-ordinates in (RPT) method[15] are given by:

The speed of the wave λ and ϵ is a small real parameter. Expanding quantities in Eqs. (1)–(5) about their equilibrium values:

The last equations are valid with conditions: , , . Using Eqs. (8) and (9) into Eqs. (1)–(6)for quasi-neutrality condition at equilibrium,[39] the lowest-order in ϵ gives:

The dispersion form is given by:

The next equations of yield:

Put out , , , , and in Eqs. (12)–(16), one obtained the Burger equation for :

where

Equation (17) admits the IA shock wave solution as

whose amplitude equals with .

The physical quantities , , and can be rewritten as:

Equations for the next order in ϵ are given by:

Eliminating , , , and from Eqs. (21)–(25), we get a linearly inhomogeneous Burger type equation for and :

where

where the coefficients Ai (where ) are given by:

In summary, our model reduced to nonlinear Burger equation (17) for and Burger type equation (26) for source term (28) is a function .

3 Stationary Solution

By using Eq. (19), Eq. (27) can be transformed into the form:

where

According to the homogeneous equation of Eq. (29) has two independent solutions, one of them is, , and the other, which can be derived using reduction of order method along with Able’s theorem, is given by . Using the variation of parameters method,[4041] the particular solution of Eq. (29) can be written as

where and are given by

with

Then, the formal stationary IA shock solution is given by:

4 Model Results and Discussions

Shock waves are studied in unmagnetized viscous positive negative ion plasmas. Numerical values have been introduced for Earth’s ionosphere (D- and F-regions).[12,2223] According to the wave dissipation caused by kinematic viscosity, the studied system supports electrostatic shock waves. However, the main essential stimulus was to study the contribution of higher-order electric field structures associated to the shock waves. The comparison of lowest order and higher-order shock noise and associated electric field structures are shown in Fig. 1. It is shown that higher-order decreases both steepness and amplitude of shock form and modulates the associated electric field structure. We have studied the effectuation of plasma parameters such as the population of nonthermal electrons δ, the kinematic viscosities coefficient of positive negative ions and and the ion mass ratio Q () on the dynamics formation of higher-order broadband electrostatic shock noise. For example, Fig. 2 shows that, the increase of electron nonthermal parameter δ decreases shock steepness and amplitude. Accordingly, the amplitude and width of associated electric field of shock structure decreased also. On the other hand, the effect of kinematic viscosity coefficients of positive-negative ions and on higher-order shock profile ϕ and associated electric field structures Ef have been examined in Figs. 34. It is found that as and increase the steepness, amplitude of higher-order shock wave and higher-order electric field structures associated to the shock waves. The physical reason for this behavior is that the increase of kinematic viscosity coefficients increases the dissipation and consequently causes strong shock wave and associated electric field structures. Finally, the ratio raise of positive-negative mass Q decreases both wave amplitude and steepness of electrostatic shocks as shown in Fig. 5. In summary, it has been noted that the involvement of higher-order effects, positive-negative mass ratio Q, electron nonthermal parameter δ and kinematic viscosities coefficient of positive and negative ions and would regulate the countenance of ion electrostatic acoustic shock waves in D- and F-regions of Earth’s ionosphere.

Fig. 1 The comparison of lowest and higher-order shock profile and associated electric field structures for Q = 0.03, , , , and .
Fig. 2 Variation of higher-order shock profile ϕ and associated electric field structures Ef vs. χ and δ for , , , .
Fig. 3 Variation of higher-order shock profile ϕ and associated electric field structures Ef vs. χ and for , , , and .
Fig. 4 Variation of higher-order shock profile ϕ and associated electric field structures Ef vs. χ and for , , , and .
Fig. 5 Variation of higher-order shock profile ϕ and associated electric field structures Ef vs. χ and Q for , , , and .
5 Conclusion

Ion shock waves are discussed in three collisionless unmagnetized plasmas components having viscous fluid of positive (+) and negative (−) ion and nonthermally electron distribution. The nonlinear Burger equation (17) for lowest order and linear inhomogeneous Burger type equation (26) for higher-order dissipation are obtained. Renormalization technique gives stationary solution for perturbation theory equations. It is emphasized that steepness and amplitude of higher-order shock waves are sensitive to higher-order effects, positive-negative mass ratio electron nonthermal parameter δ and kinematic viscosities coefficient of positive (negative) ions . It is clear to confirm that the increase (decrease) of and (Q and δ) can lead to the increase of higher-order broadband electrostatic shock amplitude. The results obtained may be useful in understanding electrostatic shock noise in Earth’s ionosphere.

Reference
1SabryR.MoslemW.M.ShuklaP.K.Phys. Plasmas162009032302
2ElwakilS.A.El-ShewyE.K.AbdelwahedH.G.Phys. Plasmas.172010052301
3MasseyH.Negative Ions3rd ednCambridge University PressCambridge1976
4CoatesA.J.CraryF.J.LewisG.R.YoungD.T.WaiteJ.H.SittlerE.C.Geophys. Res. Lett.342007L22103
5SaleemH.Phys. Plasmas142007014505
6OoharaW.KuwabaraY.HatakeyamaR.Phys. Rev. E752007056403
7LundinR.et alNatureLondon3411989609
8AsbridgeJ.R.BameS.J.StrongI.B.J. Geophys. Res.7319685777
9CairnsR.A.MamunA.A.BinghamR.BoströmR.DendyR.O.NairnsC.M.C.ShuklaP.K.Geophys. Res. Lett.2219952709
10SahuB.RoychoudhuryR.J.Phys. Plasmas132006072302
11MasudM.M.AsaduzzamanM.MamunA.A.Astrophysics and Space Science3432013647
12ElwakilS.A.El-hanbalyA.M.ElgarayhiA.El-ShewyE.K.KassemA.I.Advances in Space Research5420141786
13GillT.S.SainiN.S.HarvinderK.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals2820061106
14AbdelwahedH.G.El-ShewyE.K.ZahranM.A.ElwakilS.A.Phys. Plasmas232016022306
15WashimiH.TaniutiT.Phys. Rev. Lett.171966996
16AbdelwahedH.G.El-ShewyE.K.Phys. Plasmas192012072301
17ChatterjeeP.MondalG.RoyK.MuniandyS.V.YapS.L.WongC.S.Phys. Plasmas162009072102
18ChatterjeeP.RoyK.MuniandyS.V.WongC.S.Phys. Plasmas162009112106
19KalejahiA.E.KourakisI.ShuklaP.K.Phys. Plasmas1520082008
20AsgariH.MuniandyS.V.WongC.S.Phys. Plasmas172010063704
21El-ShewyE.K.ZahranM.A.SchoepfK.ElwakilS.A.Phys. Scr.782008025501
22BlandfordR.EichlerD.Phys. Rep.15419871
23StrokinN.A.Sov. Phys. J. Energy Theor. Phys.6119856
24HussainS.AkhtarN.Phys. Plasmas202013012305
25NakamuraY.BailungH.ShuklaP.K.Phys. Rev. Lett.8319991602
26ShuklaP.K.TagareS.G.Phys. Lett. A59197638
27SarmaA.NakamuraY.Phys. Lett. A37320094174
28El-ShewyE.K.AbdelwahedH.G.ElmessaryM.A.Phys. Plasmas182011113702
29El-HanbalyA.M.El-ShewyE.K.ElgarayhiA.KassemA.I.Commun. Theor. Phys.642015529
30El-ShewyE.K.El-WakilS.A.El-HanbalyA.M.SallahM.DarweeshH.F.Astrophys. Space Sci.3562015269
31El-HanbalyA.M.SallahaM.El-ShewyE.K.DarweeshH.F.J. Exp. Theor. Phys.1212015669
32CairnsR.A.BinghamR.NorreysP.TrinesR.Phys. Plasmas212014022112
33AbdelwahedH.G.Phys. Plasmas222015092102
34HussainS.MahmoodS.Ur-RehmanHafeezPhys. Plasmas20201306210
35ShahmansouriM.MamunA.A.Phys. Plasmas202013082122
36AbdelwahedH.G.El-ShewyE.K.Commun. Theor. Phys.602013445
37MasoodW.RizviH.Phys. Plasmas182011042302
38MasoodW.RizviH.Phys. Plasmas192012012119
39MandalG.ChatterjeeP.Verlag Z Naturforschung093220100784
40El-LabanyS.K.J. Plasma Phys.541995295
41KodamaY.TaniutiT.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.451978298