Discovery of unprecedented prenylated indole piperazines and pyrazines through cryptic biosynthetic gene cluster heterologous expression

  • Ziou Zha 1 ,  
  • Dan He 1 ,  
  • Jianguo Song 2 ,  
  • Zhenhua Guan 3 ,  
  • Jiapei Han 1 ,  
  • Chang Liu 1 ,  
  • Xinyu Wang 1 ,  
  • Yongchun Zhu 1 ,  
  • Hucheng Zhu 1 ,  
  • Wencai Ye 2 ,  
  • Qin Li 1 ,  
  • Yonghui Zhang 1 ,  
  • Yuan Zhou 1
  •     
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-026-00601-7.
Additional file 1.
Additional file 2.
Additional file 3.
Additional file 4.
Additional file 5.

Abstract

Prenylation modifications of natural products typically introduce greater structural complexity and enhance their biological activities. Yet, the modification of piperazine alkaloids by dimethylallyl tryptophan synthases (DMATS) remains unreported. In this study, we identified and activated a silent DMATS-containing piperazine biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC), flz, in Aspergillus flavipes via heterologous expression and in vitro enzymatic assay, leading to the isolation and identification of sixteen metabolites. Among these, twelve are new, including five tryptophan-valine-derived alkaloids (26) and seven previously unreported prenylated analogs (813, 17). Notably, 8 and 9 represent novel prenylated piperazines featuring a unique 6-5-5-6 ring system. Most significantly, we uncovered a versatile DMATS, FlzE, capable of catalyzing mono-prenylation on flexible substrates, such as piperazine, pyrazine, and diketopiperazine, at multiple sites in either regular or reverse manners. This study not only expands the chemical space of indole alkaloid derivatives but also provides a versatile and engineerable biocatalyst for the prenylation of both natural and synthetic products.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Aspergillus flavipes    Genome mining    Biosynthesis    Piperazine alkaloids    Dimethylallyl tryptophan synthases    

1 Introduction

Prenyltransferases (PT) are widely distributed across living organisms and are involved in essential primary and secondary metabolic pathways [1, 2]. Prenylation modifications of natural products (NPs, e.g., flavonoids, alkaloids, xanthones, and quinones) often introduces greater structural complexity into these NPs, significantly boosting their biological and pharmacological activities (Fig. 1a) [3, 4]. For instance, xanthohumol exhibits remarkable cancer chemopreventive and anti-HIV-1 activity [5, 6], while fumigaclavine C demonstrates anti-adipogenic and hepatoprotective effects [7, 8]. Dimethylallyl tryptophan synthases (DMATSs) are members of the soluble ABBA-PT superfamily, which mainly employs dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) as the prenyl donor and aromatic compounds as acceptors [9]. The prenylation reactions can occur in a regular manner (regular prenylation), where prenyl moieties are connected via their primary carbon to an acceptor, or in a reverse manner (reverse prenylation), via their tertiary carbon atoms (Fig. 1a) [10]. Notably, DMATS exhibit substantial substrate promiscuity, rendering them appealing candidates for development as versatile biocatalysts in chemoenzymatic synthesis [11].

Fig. 1

a The reported representative prenylated NPs, with two distinct prenylation manners highlighted in red circles. b Representative structures of fungal-derived piperazines and their corresponding bioactivities

Piperazines constitute a significant class of nitrogen-containing heterocycle compounds, finding extensive applications in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, dyes, preservatives, antioxidants, and surfactants [12]. A multitude of piperazine natural products have been isolated from fungi [1315], many of which exhibit remarkable pharmacological activities (Fig. 1b). For example, herquiline A inhibits platelet aggregation [16], whereas brasiliamide H displays convulsive activity [17]. Despite the characterization of a variety of piperazine alkaloids, only eleven fungal biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) responsible for their production have been documented (Figure S1) [16]. Functional characterization on these BGCs reveals that construction of the piperazine core relies on two key enzymes: (1) a single module nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) with A-T-R domains (A, adenylation; T, thiolation; R, reductase); and (2) an NmrA-like reductase. The NRPS enzyme can activate two amino acids as thioesters, reduce the thioesters to the corresponding amino aldehydes, and finally generate an unstable intermediate. This intermediate is then reduced to the piperazine core by the NmrA-like reductase using two equivalents of NADPH [16]. Modifications to the piperazine skeletons are primarily introduced through oxidation, cyclization, and acylation reactions, catalyzed by CYP450s, Fe(Ⅱ)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent (Fe/2OG) oxygenases, acetyltransferases, and nonribosomal peptide synthetases [16, 1820]. However, prenylated piperazine alkaloids catalyzed by DMATSs have yet to be reported.

In this study, we identified a silent DMATS-containing piperazine BGC (designated flz) in Aspergillus flavipes by using prenyltransferase FgaPT2 as a probe. Heterologous expression of two core biosynthetic genes (flzA and flzB) and a tailoring DMATS encoding gene (flzE) in Aspergillus nidulans, combined with an in vitro chemoenzymatic assay, activated the biosynthesis of sixteen metabolites. These were subsequently isolated via mass spectrometry-guided fractionation and structurally characterized using integrated NMR, ECD, and X-ray crystallographic analyses, revealing twelve previously undescribed (26, 813, and 17) and four known (1, 7, and 1516) tryptophan-valine-derived alkaloids. Among these new compounds, seven are prenylated derivatives, encompassing piperazines (89), pyrazines (1013), and diketopiperazines (17). Among the five unprenylated new ones, three (24) were confirmed to be post-modified by endogenous enzymes in A. nidulans. Beyond the discovery of a substantial number of new compounds, our study demonstrated that FlzE is a unique DMATS capable of catalyzing mono-prenylation on flexible indole-containing substrates, such as piperazine, pyrazine, and diketopiperazine, at multiple sites in either regular or reverse manners. In summary, the activation of flz gene cluster and the characterization of the DMATS FlzE not only broaden the chemical diversity of prenylated alkaloids but also lay the foundation for the development of a versatile and engineerable biocatalyst for the prenylation of both natural and synthesized products that harbor the indole moiety.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Identification of a DMATS-containing Gene Cluster Producing Pyrazines and Piperazines

In a previous study, we sequenced the genome of an A. flavipes strain sourced from the intertidal zone. Bioinformatics analysis (via the antiSMASH website [21]) identified 78 secondary metabolite BGCs in its genome, [22] indicating significant potential for natural product synthesis. To explore the capability of A. flavipes to produce prenylated alkaloids, we targeted a silent indole derivative BGC, designated as flz, using the DMATS-type enzyme FgaPT2 from Aspergillus fumigatus as a probe (Fig. 2a and Table S3) [23]. The flz gene cluster contains two core biosynthetic genes: flzA, encoding an NRPS with A-T-R domains, and flzB, encoding an NmrA-like reductase. Sequence alignment revealed that flzA and flzB share 70% and 62% amino acids identity, respectively, with the two-gene cassette cpsA and cpsB in the cps BGC, which is solely reported to be responsible for the biosynthesis of (S,S)-trypyl-valyl piperazine derivatives (Fig. 2a) [18]. Unlike the core genes, several genes encoding tailoring enzyme, including two CYP450 genes (flzC and flzD) and a methyltransferase gene (flzF), displayed limited sequence identities (< 50%) with those in cps cluster (Fig. 2a). Notably, the flz cluster contains a DMATS gene (flzE), which is absent from all the reported piperazine BGCs, suggesting its potential to synthesize unprecedented prenylated piperazines (Figure S1) [16].

Fig. 2

a Comparative representation of the flz gene cluster from A. flavipes and the cps gene cluster from Aspergillus campestris. b LC–MS analysis of the A. nidulans control and the transformants AN-flzA and AN-flzAB. EIC, extracted ion chromatography. c LC–MS analysis of the E. coli control and the transformant E. coli-flzA. d LC–MS analysis of the A. nidulans fed with 1 and the untreated control. e Proposed biosynthetic pathway of compounds 17; compounds 26 are new

To activate the production of the flz cluster, flzA was cloned under the gpdA promoter and transformed into the heterologous host Aspergillus nidulans LO8030 (AN) [24], yielding an overexpression strain AN-flzA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis of the AN-flzA culture, compared to the AN wild control, revealed new ion peaks at m/z 252.1502 ([M + H]+), 268.1450 ([M + H]+), 284.1403 ([M + H]+), 253.1304 ([M + H]+), and 291.1712 ([M + H]+) (Fig. 2b, trace ⅰ). Following large-scale fermentation of the AN-flzA strain, six compounds were isolated and structurally characterized as flaviazine A (1), flaviazine B (2), flaviazine C (3), flaviazine D (4), flaviazine E (5), and flaviazine F (6) by NMR and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Figs. 2e, S6–S51 and Tables S4–S9).

Compound 1 features a pyrazine skeleton formed through the condensation of one molecule L-Tyr aldehyde and one molecule L-Val aldehyde [18]. Compounds 2, 3, and 4 are oxygenated derivatives of compound 1 on the C-17, C-2, and both C-2/C-3 positions, respectively. Given that the NRPS FlzA lacks oxidation functionality towards the pyrazine substrate, we hypothesize that these products arise from modifications by endogenous oxidases in A. nidulans. To confirm this, 1 was fed to wild-type A. nidulans, and as expected, compounds 24 were significantly produced (Fig. 2d). Intriguingly, flaviazine E (5), featuring a pyridine skeleton derived from the same two amino acid precursors, was also identified in the AN-flzA strain. This indicated that the single-module NRPS, FlzA, can employ structurally distinct amino acids as building blocks to construct divergent nitrogen-containing heterocyclic skeletons. When flzA was expressed in E. coli, only 1 and 5 were detected in the recombinant strain, further confirming the above deductions (Fig. 2c). Compound 6, a linear amino acid condensate with a C-14 hydroxyl group, was not produced in E. coli, implying its formation requires multiple endogenous enzymes, such as reductase and oxygenase, in A. nidulans.

Given that the formation of the piperazine skeleton necessitates the involvement of an NmrA-like reductase [16], we subsequently transformed the NmrA-like reductase-encoding gene, flzB, into the AN strain harboring flzA, yielding the AN-flzAB strain. As expected, LC–MS analysis of the fermentation extracts from AN-flzAB predominantly revealed a new ion peak at m/z 258.1970 ([M + H]+). Following large-scale fermentation and isolation, this compound was purified and subsequently characterized as the previously reported (S,S)-trypyl-valyl piperazine (7) (Fig. 2b, trace-ⅱ, and Fig. 2e) through NMR analysis (Table S10 and Figures S52–S56).

2.2 Functional characterization of the tailoring enzymes in the flz gene cluster

After confirming the core genes involved in synthesizing the piperazine backbone compound 7, we focus on the modification steps catalyzed by post-tailoring enzymes within the flz cluster. The DMATS-encoding gene flzE, unique to the flz cluster compared to other piperazine BGCs, was first introduced into the AN-flzAB strain. LC–MS analysis of the extracts from the AN-flzABE strain, compared to the AN-flzAB control, revealed two new peaks at m/z 326.2594 ([M + H]+, 8) and 354.2545 ([M + H]+, 9) (Fig. 3a, trace ⅰ). The observed quasi-molecular ion peak of 8, which is 68 Da higher than 7 (m/z 258.1970) suggested a molecular formula of C21H31N3, indicating the presence of a dimethylallyl group in compound 8. The predicted molecular formula of 9 (C22H31N3O, 28 Da more than 8) suggested it was a formyl-substituted 8. Following large-scale fermentation and purification, the structures of 8 and 9 were determined through extensive NMR analysis and ECD calculations (Fig. 3b, c).

Fig. 3

a LC–MS analysis of the A. nidulans control and the different combination transformants. b Structures of compounds 8 and 9, along with key 1H–1H COSY, HMBC, and NOESY correlations. c Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 8 and 9 in MeOH. d Proposed catalytic mechanism of FlzE for the formation of compounds 8 and 9

The 1H and 13C NMR data (Table 1 and Figures S57–S65) of 8, assigned by DEPT and HSQC experiments, exhibited signals for two singlet methyl groups at δH 0.92 (3H, H-23) and 1.05 (3H, H-24), one olefin proton at δH 5.99 (H-21), and two terminal olefin protons at δH 5.08 (2H, H-20), along with corresponding carbon resonances at δC 114.0 (C-20), 146.0 (C-21), 42.6 (C-22), 19.3 (C-23), and 18.7 (C-24). These data confirmed the "reverse" attachment of the dimethylallyl moiety to the backbone structure. Compared to the 13C NMR spectrum of compound 7, the absence of a carbon–carbon double bond signals between C-2 and C-3 in the indole ring, along with one more degree of unsaturation compared to 7, suggests the formation of an extra ring. In the HMBC experiment, correlations from H-2 (δH 4.13) to C-15 (δC 50.8) in the piperazine ring and to the sp3 quaternary C-22 in the dimethylallyl group, from H-11 (δH 2.55), CH3-21, and CH3-22 to the sp3 quaternary C-3 (δC 62.8), from H-10 (δH 1.62 and 2.52) to C-22 revealed the formation of a C-N bond between C-2 and N-16 and the attachment of the dimethylallyl moiety to C-3. The relative configuration of C-2 and C-3 was determined by analyzing the NOESY spectrum, where key correlations between H-2 and CH3-22, as well as H-2 and CH3-23, indicated that the dimethylallyl moiety and H-2 were co-facial (Fig. 3b). To determine the absolute configuration of 8, we compared the experimental ECD spectra with their TD-DFT-calculated values. Four stereoisomers of compound 8 (2S/3R/11S/14S, 2R/3S/11S/14S, 2R/3S/11R/14R, and 2S/3R/11R/14R) were subjected to ECD calculation using Gaussian 09 program with the TD-DFT-B3LYP/6–311 + + G(d, p) level of theory on a B3LYP/6–311 + + G(d) optimized geometry through the polarizable conductor calculation model (SMD) in MeOH [25]. The ECD spectrum of 2S, 3R, 11S, 14S-8 matched well with the experimental spectrum (Fig. 3c). Thus, the structure of 8, named flaviazine H, featuring a novel 6–5-5–6 tetracyclic piperazine scaffold, was deduced as shown. The proposed biosynthetic mechanism of 8 commences with a reverse prenylation at the C-3 position, which triggers an intramolecular electronic rearrangement, generating a key imine intermediate. Subsequent nucleophilic attack by the lone pair electrons on N-16 at the C-2 position of the imine results in C–N bond formation (Fig. 3d).

Table 1

1H NMR (600 MHz; δ in ppm, J in Hz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) data of compounds 8 and 9 (in CD3OD)

No. 8 9
δH (mult, J) δC δH (mult, J) δC
2 4.13 (s) 86.0 4.802 85.1
3 62.8 55.8
4 7.10 (d, 6.9) 126.7 7.33 (d, 7.9) 112.0
5 6.72 (m) 119.8 7.29 (t, 7.5) 125.7
6 7.05 (m) 129.0 7.26 (t, 7.7) 129.3
7 6.62 (d, 6.6) 111.7 7.17 (d, 7.4) 126.5
8 151.4 148.9
9 135.9 140.2
10 2.52 (ma) 38.7 2.44 (mb) 38.2
1.62 (d, 11.8) 2.34 (d, 12.1)
11 2.55 (ma) 57.7 2.80 (m) 58.0
12 2.62 (dd, 11.8, 4.6) 49.7 2.64 (m) 49.6
3.39 (m1) 3.39 (m)
14 2.90 (m) 62.1 2.80 (m) 62.2
15 2.29 (m) 50.8 2.49 (mb) 52.3
3.53 (br.d, 12.0) 3.68 (d, 13.1)
17 1.87 (m) 30.9 1.85 (m) 30.6
18 1.05 (d, 6.9) 19.3 1.05 (d, 6.8) 19.3
19 1.05 (d, 6.9) 18.7 1.01 (d, 6.9) 18.8
20 5.08 (dd, 17.6 14.2) 114.0 2.34 (d, 12.4) 41.0
5.04 (dd, 17.6, 14.2) 1.72 (m)
21 5.99 (br.t, 14.3) 146.0 6.72 (t, 7.2) 119.5
22 42.6 136.8
23 0.92 (s) 23.0 1.53 (s) 18.2
24 1.05 (s) 23.0 1.62 (s) 26.0
25 8.60 (s) 162.1
a,bOverlapped signals
1Overlapped by solvent peak
2Overlapped by water peak

Comparing the NMR spectra of 9 with those 8, the presence of a formyl group in 9 was confirmed by the identification of an additional proton resonance at δH 8.60 (H-25) and its corresponding carbon signal at δC 162.1 (C-25) (Table 1 and Figures S66-S74). Moreover, the substitution of the formyl group at the N-1 position was inferred from the HMBC correlation between H-25 and C-2 (δC 85.1). Another significant difference between the structures of 9 and 8 is that the dimethylallyl moiety was added to the C-3 position in a regular manner, as indicated by the proton signals of two deshielded singlet methyl at δH 1.53 (3H, H-23) and 1.62 (3H, H-24), one methylene at δH 1.72 (1H, Ha-20) and 2.34 (1H, Hb-20), and one olefin at δH 6.72 (H-21) in the 1H NMR spectrum of 9. The co-facial orientation of H-2 and the dimethylallyl moiety was deduced from the key correlation between H-2 (δH 4.80) and H-23 observed in the NOESY experiment (Fig. 3b). The absolute configuration of 9 was determined using the same procedure as that of 8. Four candidate stereoisomers of compound 9 (2S/3R/11S/14S, 2R/3S/11S/14S, 2R/3S/11R/14R, and 2S/3R/11R/14R) were applied to ECD calculation, and the ECD spectrum of 2S, 3R, 11S, 14S-9 matched well with the experimental spectrum (Fig. 3c). Thus, the structure of 9, namely, flaviazine I, was deduced as shown. The biosynthesis of 9 follows a similar mechanism to that of 8, with the differences that the substrate of prenylation in 9 is a formylated 7 and the double bond undergoes nucleophilic attack at the C-1 carbon cation of the dimethylallyl moiety (Fig. 3d).

To explore the function of the remaining tailoring enzymes within the flz cluster, three A.nidulans strains, AN-flzABCD, AN-flzABEF, and AN-flzABCDEF, were engineered. However, LC–MS analysis of the three strains revealed no new peaks (Fig. 3a, trace ⅱ–ⅴ), indicating that the methyltransferase (FlzF) and CYP450s (FlzC and FlzD) encoding genes in flz are pseudogenes not involved in the biosynthetic pathway. This observation reveals a distinct biosynthetic route of the flz gene cluster from other known piperazine BGCs, where methyltransferase and oxygenase play essential roles in piperazine derivatives biosynthesis [16]. The likely reason for the uniqueness is that during a horizontal gene transfer event, the flzE gene was translocated into the piperazine biosynthetic gene cluster of A. flavipes. Over long-term evolution, the epistatic selective pressure exerted by FlzE led to the progressive loss of activity in other tailoring genes [26, 27].

2.3 In vitro enzymatic assays of FlzE expand the chemical space of prenylated alkaloids

The discovery of reverse and regular prenylation manners in compounds 8 and 9, respectively, prompted us to further explore the catalytic potential of FlzE. Phylogenetic analysis of FlzE alongside known DMATSs showed that FlzE clustered with DMATSs that predominantly prenylate indole rings using tryptophan or indole-containing compounds as acceptors, consistent with our experimental observations (Fig. 4a and Figure S2). It is well-documented that certain DMATSs, such as AtaPT[11] and AnaPT [28], are capable of prenylating not only native substrates but also non-native molecules with diverse structures at multiple sites, thereby diversifying the range of prenylated products. To expand the chemical space of tryptophan-valine-derived alkaloid derivatives, we employed natural pyrazine (1) and chemically synthesized diketopiperazine (14) as substrates to evaluate the catalytic versatility of FlzE.

Fig. 4

a Phylogenetic tree analysis of FlzE. The symbols denoted the structural units of prenyl modification. b LC–MS analysis of the in vitro assays of FlzE toward compound 7. c LC–MS analysis of the in vitro assays of FlzE toward compound 1. d LC–MS analysis of the in vitro assays of FlzE toward compound 14. e The substrates FlzE catalyzed and their corresponding products. Compounds 1013 and 17 were new

We first utilized piperazine 7 as the native substrate to assess the feasibility of in vitro enzymatic catalysis. Recombinant N-terminally His-tagged FlzE, expressed and purified from Escherichia coli (Figure S3), was incubated with 7 in the presence of the co-substrate dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP). LC–MS analysis of the reaction mixtures showed complete consumption of substrate 7 and the exclusive production of the prenylated product 8 (Fig. 4b). Subsequently, when substrate 1 was incubated with FlzE and DMAPP, LC–MS analysis revealed multiple peaks with an identical quasi-molecular ion at m/z 320.2127 ([M + H]+, 68 Da more than 1) (Fig. 4c). Following a large-scale incubation, four previously unreported prenylated pyrazine alkaloids, namely flaviazine J (10), flaviazine K (11), flaviazine L (12), and flaviazine M (13), were purified and identified (Tables S11–S14, and Figs. 4e, S75–S106). Compound 10 exhibited reverse-prenylation at the C-2 position of 1, while 11, 12, and 13 were regularly prenylated at C-5, C-6, and the N-1 positions, respectively.

LC–MS analysis of the incubation mixture containing FlzE, DMAPP, and 14 revealed three mass peaks (1517) with an identical adduct ion at m/z 354.2182 ([M + H]+, 68 Da more than 14), with only minor substrate consumption (Fig. 4d). Large-scale incubation and purification yielded three compounds, which were identified as one new prenylated diketopiperazine (17) and two known ones (15 and 16), by extensive NMR analysis and ECD calculation (Tables S16-S18, and Figs. 4e, S108–S124). Compound 15 featured a reverse-prenylated moiety at the C-2 position, and 16 was regularly prenylated at the N-1 position. Notably, compound 17, named flaviazine N, was identified as a reverse-prenylated diketopiperazine alkaloid with a 6/5/5/6 ring system.

To elucidate the mechanistic basis of FlzE's versatility, we compared FlzE with other DMATSs that catalyze tryptophan or indole-containing compounds and analyzed their reported crystal structures (Figure S4). The results showed that DMATS possesses highly conserved amino acid residues, including a tyrosine shield required for the reaction environment (Y188, Y257, Y340, Y398, and Y409 in FlzE) and conserved glutamate (E85 in FlzE) that forms a hydrogen bond with the N-1 atom of indole [1, 23]. In contrast, residues that interact with substrates are not conserved in different DMATS (S92, M94, W182, and Y205 in FtmPT1; T108 in CdpNPT; and I100 in NotF) [23, 29, 30]. These non-conserved residues, along with flexible loop regions, may suggest that different substrates adopt distinct conformations in the active pocket of FlzE, leading to variations in the distance between the active sites of indole and the C-1/C-3 of the prenyl donor. Collectively, these structural features provide a plausible explanation for the observed divergence in the mechanism of FlzE prenylation.

3 Conclusion

This study represented the identification and activation of a distinctive BGC for DMATS-containing piperazine alkaloid. Through heterologous expression and in vitro enzymatic assays, the silent gene cluster flz was successfully activated, leading to the isolation and identification of five novel tryptophan-valine-derived alkaloids and seven previously undescribed prenylated analogs. The core biosynthetic enzymes, FlzA and FlzB, were shown to utilize two structurally distinct amino acid precursors to synthesize diverse alkaloid scaffolds, including piperazine, pyrazine, and pyridine. Functional studies unveiled FlzE as an unusual DMATS: (1) it specifically prenylated the indole C-3 position of native piperazine substrates, triggering intramolecular cyclization to form novel skeletons, such as compounds 8 and 9, which feature a 6–5-5–6 ring system; (2) it facilitated multi-site prenylation of non-native pyrazines and diketopiperazines, producing a variety of prenylated derivatives. However, the enzymatic mechanism underlying its versatile prenylation capability warrants further exploration.

Based on the known activities of structurally similar compounds, such as tryprostatin B with anti-tubulin activity and fumitremorgin C as a potent and specific chemosensitizing agent [31, 32], these new prenylated alkaloids discovered in this study expanded the chemical space of indole alkaloids and enriched the pool of chemical candidates for innovative drug discovery. Furthermore, the exploration of FlzE's catalytic properties lays the groundwork for elucidating its enzymatic mechanism and opens the potential to engineer this enzyme into a precise prenylation biocatalyst.

4 Experimental section

4.1 Strains and culture conditions

All strains and plasmids used and generated in this study are listed in Table S1. A. flavipes (QM507) was derived from the intertidal zone of the Yangtze River in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. The sequence data for this strain have been submitted to the EMBL/GenBank under accession No. KP339510. A voucher sample (ID: QM507) was preserved in the herbarium of the Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China [33]. To extract genomic DNA (gDNA), A. flavipes was cultured in PDB liquid medium (4 g/L potato starch, 20 g/L dextrose, Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA) at 28 ℃ for seven days. Aspergillus nidulans LO8030 was used as the host for the heterologous expression of the flz gene cluster. A. nidulans was cultured on solid CD medium (10 g/L glucose, 50 ml/L 20× nitrate salts, 1 ml/L trace elements, 20 g/L agar) at 37 ℃ for 3–4 days for sporulation, or in liquid or CD-ST medium (20 g/L starch, 20 g/L tryptone, 50 ml/L 20× nitrate salts, 1 ml/L trace elements) at 28 ℃ for 4 days for heterologous expression and compounds production. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BJ5464-NpgA was used as the host for heterologous recombination to construct the A. nidulans overexpression plasmids. S. cerevisiae was grown in yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) medium (20 g/L glucose, 20 g/L tryptone, 10 g/L yeast extract) at 30 ℃. Escherichia coli DH5α was used for plasmid construction, Escherichia coli BAP1 was used for FlzA expression [34], and Escherichia coli BL21 for protein expression. All E. coli strains were cultured at 37 ℃ for cloning or 16 ℃ for protein expression.

4.2 Chemicals and chemical analysis

All LC–MS analysis was performed on an Agilent 1290 HPLC system equipped with a 6545 Q-TOF spectrometer (Agilent Eclipse Plus, C18 column, 3.5 µm, 100 × 2.1 mm, gradient CH3CN/H2O (with 0.1% formic acid) = 5/95 ~ 98/2, 0.0 ~ 11.0 min; isocratic CH3CN/H2O (with 0.1% formic acid) = 100/0, 11.0 ~ 13.0 min; isocratic CH3CN/H2O (with 0.1% formic acid) = 5/95, 13.0 ~ 17.0 min, flow rate = 0.5 mL/min), using positive mode electrospray ionization. Data were evaluated with the Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis B.07.00 software. Analysis of secondary metabolites was performed on an Agilent series 1220 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, USA) with an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm). Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on an Agilent series 1220 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, USA) with an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 µm). 1H, 13C, and 2D NMR spectra were obtained at a Bruker AM-600 NMR spectrometer. Silica gel (100–200 mesh, 200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., China) was used in the chromatography processes.

4.3 Construction of A. nidulans expression plasmids

For the construction of A. nidulans expression plasmids, fragments of flzA–E were amplified from gDNA with two homologous arms by PCR. The glaA, gpdA, amyB promoters were amplified from different vectors pYTU, pYTR, and pYTP, respectively, using primer pairs glaA-F/R, gpdA-F/R, and amyB-F/R. Plasmid pYTU was digested with NotI and SmiI, and plasmids pYTR and pYTP were digested with BamHI and SmiI to serve as vectors for gene insertion. Expression plasmids were constructed via yeast homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae BJ5464-NpgA. Circular plasmids were then extracted from yeast and transformed into E. coli DH5α strain to obtain purified plasmids for transformation.

4.4 Construction of A. nidulans expression plasmids

A. nidulans was cultured on solid CD medium containing 10 mM uridine, 5 mM uracil, 1 μg/mL pyridoxine HCl, and 0.25 μg/mL riboflavin at 37 ℃ for 4 days. Spores were collected in 10% glycerol and inoculated into 30 mL of liquid CD medium. The culture was then incubated at 37 ℃ and 250 rpm for 6 h. After germination, cultures were centrifuged at 4 ℃ and 7,000 rpm for 10 min to harvest mycelia. The mycelia were washed twice with 15 mL of osmotic buffer (1.2 M MgSO4·7H2O, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 5.8) at 4 ℃, 5,000 rpm for 10 min, and then resuspended in 10 mL of osmotic buffer containing 30 mg of Lysing Enzymes (Sigma) and 20 mg of Yatalase (Takara). The suspension was transferred into a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask and cultured at 37 ℃, 80 rpm for 4 h. The culture fluid was poured into a sterile 50 mL centrifugal tube and gently overlaid with 10 mL of trapping buffer (0.6 M sorbitol, 0.1 M Tris–HCl, pH 7.0), and centrifuged again at 4 ℃, 5,000 rpm for 15 min. The protoplast layer was transferred and dispersed into twice the volume of STC buffer (1.2 M sorbitol, 10 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5), and then centrifuged at 4 ℃, 5,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was removed, and STC buffer was added to resuspend the protoplast for transformation. To obtain heterologous expression strains in A. nidulans, 10 µL of plasmids (pZ7301-73) was added to 100 µL of A. nidulans protoplast. After incubation on ice for 60 min, 1.25 mL of 60% PEG solution was added, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cultured on regeneration dropout solid CD-SD medium (CD medium supplemented with 1.2 mM sorbitol) at 37 ℃ for 2–3 days to induce sporulation. Transformants were transferred to solid CD medium at 37 ℃ for 3–4 days. Spores were then incubated on solid CD-ST medium (20 g/L starch, 20 g/tryptone, 50 ml/L nitrate salts, 1 ml/L trace elements and 20 g/L agar) at 28 ℃ for 4 days or in liquid CD-ST medium (20 g/L starch, 20 g/tryptone, 50 ml/L nitrate salts and 1 ml/L trace element) at 28 ℃ and 250 rpm for 4 days. Products from all combination strains for A. nidulans heterologous expression were extracted with methanol, dried in vacuo, and dissolved in methanol for LC–MS analysis.

4.5 Construction of plasmid of His-tagged FlzE and expression in E. coli

The gene flzE was amplified from cDNA of A. flavipes by using primer pair pET28a-FlzE-F/R. The EcoRI and XhoI-digested fragments of the pET28a plasmid were subjected to Gibson assembly (NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix, New England BioLabs) with flzE to construct pET28a-FlzE. The plasmid was introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cell via heat shock transformation. A single colony was then cultured overnight in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with 50 µg/mL kanamycin at 37 ℃. Cells were then transferred to fresh LB medium containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin and cultured at 37 ℃ until an optical density at OD600 of 0.6 was reached. At this point, 1 mol/L Isopropyl β-dthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to achieve a final concentration of 0.5 mmol/L, and the cultures were then continued for an additional 20 h at 16 ℃ to induce the target protein expression. All purification steps were carried out at 4 ℃. The cultured cells were resuspended in a lysis buffer (pH 8.0) composed of 50 mmol/L NaH2PO4·H2O, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 300 mmol/L NaCl, and 10 mmol/L imidazole. Cells were lysed by sonication, and the insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 30 min. The supernatant was then loaded onto a Ni–NTA Resin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) column. The resin was washed with 50 column volumes of Lysis buffer containing 40 mmol/L imidazole, after which the target protein was eluted with Lysis buffer containing 250 mmol/L imidazole. The protein solution was concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter devices (10K MWCO, Millipore). The target protein was subsequently eluted in a buffer composed of 50 mmol/L Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) and 10% (v/v) glycerol and stored at −80 ℃. Protein purity was assayed by SDS-PAGE, and the results are summarized in Figures S3. Protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein quantification kit (Shanghai Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd).

4.6 In Vitro assays of FlzE

To investigate the function of FlzE, an enzymatic assay (with a total volume of 100 µL) was conducted using a mixture composed of Tris–HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5), 1 mM DMAPP, 1 mM 10 and 10 µM FlzE. The assay was incubated at 37 ℃ for 12 h. Subsequently, 200 µL of methanol was added to quench the reaction. Following centrifugation at 13,300 rpm for 30 min, the resulting supernatant was analyzed using LC–MS.

4.7 Chemical synthesis of compound 14

To verify the substrate promiscuity of FlzE, we attempted to synthesis compound 14 via chemical methods. To a solution of protected-amino acid (1equiv) and tryptophan methyl ester hydrochloride (1equiv) in dry DCM (0.2 M) was added DIPEA (2 equiv), HOBt (1.1 equiv), and EDCI‧HC1 (1.2 equiv) at 0 ℃. After 1 h, the mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight. Water was added and the mixture was extracted with DCM. The combined organic layer was washed with 10% HCl, sat. NaHCO3, and brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes/ethyl acetate) to give the dipeptide. A solution of amide (2.0 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 was treated with HCOOH at rt for 3 h. Solvent was then evaporated and the reaction mixture was dissolved in 2-butanol: toluene (3:1) followed by addition of triethylamine. The mixture was allowed to reflux for 16 h. After the evaporation of solvent, diketopiperazines precipitated as a white solid, which was filtered off, washed with MeOH, and used for next step without further purification.

4.8 Isolation and purification of compounds

The AN-flzA recombinant was cultured in 8 L solid CD-ST medium at 28 ℃ for 7 days, and the culture was extracted with methanol three times. The organic solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum to obtain the crude extracts (130.0 g), which were subjected to silica gel column chromatography (200–300 mesh) using a DCM/MeOH gradient elution (150:1, 100:1, 50:1, 10:1, 5:1, 1:1, 1:2) to obtain seven fractions (Frs. 1–7). Fraction 1 (DCM/MeOH 150:1) was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column to yield 1 (20 mg; ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 60:40, v/v, 2.0 mL/min, tR = 8 min). Fraction 3 (DCM/MeOH 50:1) was fractionated on a silica gel column eluted with DCM/MeOH (100:1, 80:1, 50:1) to yield three major fractions (Fr.3.1–Fr.3.3). Fraction 3.3 (DCM/MeOH 50:1) was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 35:65, v/v, 2.0 mL/min) to yield 2 (9 mg; tR = 17 min) and 3 (3 mg; tR = 25 min). Fraction 5 (DCM/MeOH 5:1) was fractionated on a silica gel column eluted with DCM/MeOH (25:1, 10:1, 8:1, 5:1) to yield four major fractions (Fr.5.1–Fr.5.4). Fraction 5.4(DCM/MeOH 5:1) was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 30:70, v/v, 2.0 mL/min) to yield 4 (8 mg; tR = 17 min) and 5 (3 mg; tR = 26 min). Fraction 6 (DCM/MeOH 1:1) was fractionated on a silica gel column eluted with DCM/MeOH (10:1, 5:1, 2:1, 1;1) to yield four major fractions (Fr.6.1–Fr.6.4). Fraction 6.4(DCM/MeOH 1:1) was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column to yield 6 (1.4 mg; ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 20:80, v/v, 2.0 mL/min, tR = 10 min).

The AN-flzAB recombinant was cultured in 4 L solid CD-ST medium at 28 ℃ for 7 days, and the culture was extracted with methanol three times. The organic solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum to obtain the crude extracts (30.0 g), which were subjected to silica gel column chromatography (200–300 mesh) using a DCM/MeOH gradient elution (10:1, 5:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:5) to obtain seven fractions (Frs. 1–5). Fraction 4 (DCM/MeOH 1:2) was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column to yield 7 (20 mg; ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 10:90, v/v, 2.0 mL/min, tR = 6 min).

The AN-flzABE recombinant was cultured in 4 L solid CD-ST medium at 28 ℃ for 7 days, and the culture was extracted with methanol three times. The organic solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum to obtain the crude extracts (30.0 g), which were subjected to silica gel column chromatography (200–300 mesh) using a DCM/MeOH gradient elution (50:1, 10:1, 5:1, 1:1) to obtain four fractions (Frs. A-D). Fraction D (DCM/MeOH 5:1) was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 38:62, v/v, 2.0 mL/min) to yield 8 (1 mg; tR = 18 min) and 9 (0.9 mg; tR = 22 min).

The isolation and purification of compounds 1013 was conducted using a mixture composed of Tris–HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5), 1 mM 1 and 10 µM FlzE. The assay was incubated at 37 ℃ for 12 h. Subsequently, methanol was added to quench the reaction, and the culture was extracted with ethyl acetate three times. The organic solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum to obtain the crude extracts. Which was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 75:25, v/v, 2.0 mL/min) to yield to yield 10 (1 mg; tR = 13 min), 11 (0.9 mg; tR = 20 min), 12 (1.2 mg; tR = 22 min), 13 (0.8 mg; tR = 23 min).

Compounds 1517 were isolated and purified from an enzymatic assay, conducted using a mixture composed of Tris–HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5), 1 mM 14 and 10 µM FlzE. The assay was incubated at 37 ℃ for 12 h. Subsequently, methanol was added to quench the reaction, and the culture was extracted with ethyl acetate three times. The organic solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum to obtain the crude extracts. Which was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (ACN–H2O (with 0.1% formic acid), 55:45, v/v, 2.0 mL/min) to yield 15 (2 mg; tR = 13 min), 16 (3 mg; tR = 20 min), 17 (2 mg; tR = 22 min).

Flaviazine B (2): yellow powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 220 (0.67), 273 (0.31) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3361, 2920, 2850, 1631, 1457, 1357, 1340, and 734 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S5 and Figures S14-S21; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 268.1463 (calcd for C16H18N3O, 268.1450).

Flaviazine C (3): yellow powder; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S6 and Figures S22-S26; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 268.1472 (calcd for C16H18N3O, 268.1450).

Flaviazine D (4): yellow powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 210 (0.79), 270 (0.29) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3359, 3203, 1772, 1622, 1471, 1038, and 751 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S7 and Figures S27-S34; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 284.1421 (calcd for C16H18N3O2, 284.1399).

Flaviazine E (5): brown powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 200 (0.74), 220 (0.73), 282 (0.21), 315 (0.25) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3364, 2920, 2850, 1606, 1424, and 741 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S8 and Figures S35-S43; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 253.1365 (calcd for C16H17N2O, 253.1341).

Flaviazine F (6): white powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 203 (0.36), 220 (0.54), 280 (0.09) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3255, 2920, 2850, 1671, 1595, 1433, 1399, and 736 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S9 and Figures S44-S51; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 291.1689 (calcd for C16H23N2O3, 291.1709).

Flaviazine H (8): white powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 210 (0.53), 245 (0.27), 295 (0.10) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3391, 3365, 2850, 1646, 1632, 1604, and 1384 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 1 and Figures S57-S65; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 326.2596 (calcd for C21H32N3, 326.2596).

Flaviazine I (9): white powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 210 (0.28), 247 (0.16), 287 (0.09) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3365, 2920, 2850, 1631, 1598, 1384, and 1357 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 1 and Figures S66-S74; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 354.2558 (calcd for C22H32N3O, 354.2545).

Flaviazine J (10): brown powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 225 (0.57), 275 (0.29) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3364, 2959, 2922, 2852, 1660, 1384, 1246, and 744 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S11 and Figures S75-S82; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 320.2131 (calcd for C21H26N3, 320.2127).

Flaviazine K (11): brown powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 225 (0.21), 275 (0.12) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3362, 2960, 2921, 2851, 1659, 1631, 1601, 1383, and 1357 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S12 and Figures S83-S90; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 320.2135 (calcd for C21H26N3, 320.2127).

Flaviazine L (12): brown powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 225 (0.97), 275 (0.42) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3362, 2964, 2921, 2851, 1659, 1631, 1601, 1384, and 1359 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S13 and Figures S91-S98; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 320.2138 (calcd for C21H26N3, 320.2127).

Flaviazine M (13): brown powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 225 (0.20), 275 (0.15) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3364, 2961, 2921, 2851, 1659, 1632, 1601, 1384, 1224, and 741 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S14 and Figures S99-S106; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 320.2130 (calcd for C21H26N3, 320.2127).

Compound 15: white powder, 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S16 and Figures S108-S112; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 354.2186 (calcd for C21H28N3O2, 354.2182).

Compound 16: white powder, 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S17 and Figures S113-S114; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 354.2182 (calcd for C21H28N3O2, 354.2182).

Flaviazine N (17): white powder, UV (MeOH) λmax (Abs) = 210 (1.10), 245 (0.58), 300(0.20) nm; IR (KBr) νmax = 3366, 2964, 2925, 1678, 1606, 1466, 1443, 1416, and 745 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data see Table S18 and Figures S115-S123; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ 354.2205 (calcd for C21H28N3O2, 354.2182).

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Analytical and Testing Center and Medical sub-center at HUST are acknowledged for NMR data and ECD, UV, and IR spectra collection.

Author contributions

Z.Z., D.H. conducted the primary experiments and drafted the original manuscript; J.S. carried out the X-ray crystallographic analyses; Z.G. provided support in chemical synthesis; J.H. and C.L. assisted with the LC–MS analysis. Y-C.Z. and X.W. contributed to the protein purification effort; H.Z. and W.Y. offered critical insights during manuscript preparation; Q.L. guided the compound isolation and reviewed the manuscript; Y.Z. conceived and designed the research, and, together with Y-H.Z. acquired the funding, supervised the entire study, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2021YFA0910500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81973205, 22477036, 22277035, and U22A20380), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2024BRA018), and the Sino-German Center for Research Promotion (M-0477).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Science Data Bank at.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Miller ET, Tsodikov OV, Garneau-Tsodikova S. Structural insights into the diverse prenylating capabilities of DMATS prenyltransferases. Nat Prod Rep. 2024;41: 113-47. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yazaki K, Sasaki K, Tsurumaru Y. Prenylation of aromatic compounds, a key diversification of plant secondary metabolites. Phytochemistry. 2009;70: 1739-45. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winkelblech J, Fan A, Li S-M. Prenyltransferases as key enzymes in primary and secondary metabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99: 7379-97. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mukai R. Prenylation enhances the biological activity of dietary flavonoids by altering their bioavailability. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2018;82: 207-15. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerhauser C, Alt A, Heiss E, Gamal-Eldeen A, Klimo K, Knauft J, et al. Cancer chemopreventive activity of Xanthohumol, a natural product derived from hop. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002;1: 959-69. PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Q, Ding Z-H, Liu J-K, Zheng Y-T. Xanthohumol, a novel anti-HIV-1 agent purified from Hops Humulus lupulus. Antiviral Res. 2004;64: 189-94. PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu W, Gao Y, Zhao Z, Long X, Yi Y, Ai S. Fumigaclavine C ameliorates liver steatosis by attenuating hepatic de novo lipogenesis via modulation of the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23: 288. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu W-G, He Y, Chen Y-F, Gao X-Y, Ning W-E, Liu C-Y, et al. Fumigaclavine C attenuates adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and ameliorates lipid accumulation in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2019;23: 161-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang W, Wang P, Ma C, Li K, Wang Z, Liu Y, et al. Characterization and structural analysis of a versatile aromatic prenyltransferase for imidazole-containing diketopiperazines. Nat Commun. 2025;16: 144. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tanner ME. Mechanistic studies on the indole prenyltransferases. Nat Prod Rep. 2015;32: 88-101. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen R, Gao B, Liu X, Ruan F, Zhang Y, Lou J, et al. Molecular insights into the enzyme promiscuity of an aromatic prenyltransferase. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13: 226-34. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brito AF, Moreira LKS, Menegatti R, Costa EA. Piperazine derivatives with central pharmacological activity used as therapeutic tools. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2019;33: 13-24. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sakamoto K, Tsujii E, Abe F, Nakanishi T, Yamashita M, Shigematsu N, et al. FR901483, a novel immunosuppressant isolated from Cladobotryum sp. no. 11231 taxonomy of the producing organism, fermentation, isolation, physico-chemical properties and biological activities. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1996;49: 37-44. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohamed OG, Salim AA, Khalil ZG, Elbanna AH, Bernhardt PV, Capon RJ. Chrysosporazines F-M: P-glycoprotein inhibitory phenylpropanoid piperazines from an Australian marine fish derived fungus, Chrysosporium sp. CMB-F294. J Nat Prod. 2020;83: 497-504. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Enomoto Y, Shiomi K, Hayashi M, Masuma R, Kawakubo T, Tomosawa K, et al. Herquline B, a new platelet aggregation inhibitor produced by Penicillium herquei Fg-372. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1996;49: 50-3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang R, Piggott AM, Chooi Y-H, Li H. Discovery, bioactivity and biosynthesis of fungal piperazines. Nat Prod Rep. 2023;40: 387-411. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paluka J, Kanokmedhakul K, Soytong M, Soytong K, Yahuafai J, Siripong P, et al. Meroterpenoid pyrones, alkaloid and bicyclic brasiliamide from the fungus Neosartorya hiratsukae. Fitoterapia. 2020;142: 104485. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    He Q, Zhang H-R, Zou Y. A cytochrome P450 catalyzes oxidative coupling formation of insecticidal dimeric indole piperazine alkaloids. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2024;63: e202404000. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pham M-T, Yang F-L, Liu I-C, Liang P-H, Lin H-C. Non-heme iron enzymes catalyze heterobicyclic and spirocyclic isoquinolone core formation in piperazine alkaloid biosynthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2024;63: e202401324. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang R, Liang J, Yang W, Vuong D, Kalaitzis JA, Lacey AE, et al. Heterologous biosynthesis of the sterol O-acyltransferase inhibitor helvamide unveils an α-ketoglutarate-dependent cross-linking oxygenase. Org Lett. 2024;26: 1807-12. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, Lee SY, et al. AntiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: W81-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y, Li P, Qi C, Zha Z, Meng J, Liu C, et al. Cryptic piperazine derivatives activated by knocking out the global regulator LaeA in Aspergillus flavipes. Bioorg Med Chem. 2024;103: 117685. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Metzger U, Schall C, Zocher G, Unsöld I, Stec E, Li S-M, et al. The structure of dimethylallyl tryptophan synthase reveals a common architecture of aromatic prenyltransferases in fungi and bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106: 14309-14. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chiang Y-M, Oakley CE, Ahuja M, Entwistle R, Schultz A, Chang S-L, et al. An efficient system for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite genes in Aspergillus nidulans. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135: 7720-31. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Frisch M, Trucks G, Schlegel H, Scuseria G, Robb M, Cheeseman J, et al. Gaussian 09. Gaussian Inc, Wallingford, CT. 2009;32: 5648-52. PubMed Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Turakhia Y, Chen HI, Marcovitz A, Bejerano G. A fully-automated method discovers loss of mouse-lethal and human-monogenic disease genes in 58 mammals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48: e91. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sánchez-Serna G, Badia-Ramentol J, Bujosa P, Ferrández-Roldán A, Torres-Águila NP, Fabregà-Torrus M, et al. Less, but more: new insights from appendicularians on chordate fgf evolution and the divergence of tunicate lifestyles. Mol Biol Evol. 2025;42: msae260. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yin W-B, Cheng J, Li S-M. Stereospecific synthesis of aszonalenins by using two recombinant prenyltransferases. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7: 2202-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kelly SP, Shende VV, Flynn AR, Dan Q, Ye Y, Smith JL, et al. Data science-driven analysis of substrate-permissive diketopiperazine reverse prenyltransferase NotF: applications in protein engineering and cascade biocatalytic synthesis of (−)-eurotiumin A. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144: 19326-36. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jost M, Zocher G, Tarcz S, Matuschek M, Xie X, Li S-M, et al. Structure−function analysis of an enzymatic prenyl transfer reaction identifies a reaction chamber with modifiable specificity. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132: 17849-58. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cui CB, Kakeya H, Osada H. Novel mammalian cell cycle inhibitors, tryprostatins A, B and other diketopiperazines produced by Aspergillus fumigatus. Ⅱ. Physico-chemical properties and structures. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1996;49: 534-40. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rabindran SK, Ross DD, Doyle LA, Yang W, Greenberger LM. Fumitremorgin C reverses multidrug resistance in cells transfected with the breast cancer resistance protein. Cancer Res. 2000;60: 47-50. PubMed Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li P, Meng J, Zhang X, Zhang X, Ye Y, Zhao Y, et al. Cooperative redox reactions encoded by two gene clusters enable intermolecular cycloaddition cascade for the formation of meroaspochalasins. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2025;64: e202502766. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pfeifer BA, Admiraal SJ, Gramajo H, Cane DE, Khosla C. Biosynthesis of complex polyketides in a metabolically engineered strain of E. coli. Science. 2001;291:1790–2. PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2026

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ziou Zha
    • 1
  • Dan He
    • 1
  • Jianguo Song
    • 2
  • Zhenhua Guan
    • 3
  • Jiapei Han
    • 1
  • Chang Liu
    • 1
  • Xinyu Wang
    • 1
  • Yongchun Zhu
    • 1
  • Hucheng Zhu
    • 1
  • Wencai Ye
    • 2
  • Qin Li
    • 1
  • Yonghui Zhang
    • 1
  • Yuan Zhou
    • 1
  •     
  1. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Natural Medicinal Chemistry and Resource Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
  2. 2. State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
  3. 3. Department of Pharmacy, Shenzhen People’s Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China