Cortinarius mapuveronicae from South America, a chemical and morphological link between European and Australian dermocyboid Cortinarii

  • Josefine Lange 1 ,  
  • Lesley Huymann 2 ,  
  • Sophie Schwarzkopf 3 ,  
  • Dilara Balci 1 ,  
  • Mehdi D. Davari 1 ,  
  • Arijana Turanovic 3 ,  
  • Clemens Gotsis 2 ,  
  • Götz Palfner 4 ,  
  • Bianka Siewert 3,5 ,  
  • Ursula Peintner 2 ,  
  • Norbert Arnold 1
  •     
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-025-00552-5.
Supplementary material 1.

Abstract

The new species Cortinarius mapuveronicae from Andean-Patagonian Nothofagus-forests is described in a polythetic approach combining chemical analysis of the anthraquinonoid secondary metabolites, microscopical and morphological characteristics, as well as molecular phylogeny. C. mapuveronicae exhibits an intense red color reaction of the basidiomata by treatment with KOH, whereas the basidiospores are turning purplish brown. As responsible compound, the new anthraquinonoid pigment clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1), together with the known monomeric and dimeric anthraquinones (+)-7,7-emodinphyscion (2), emodin (3), emodin-6,8-di-O-methylether (4), questin (5), (+)-(S)-skyrin (6), (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7), hypericin (8), dermolutein (9), and endocrocin (10) could be identified, showing also remarkable activity in a (photo)antimicrobial and (photo)cytotoxic assay. Phylogenetic analysis (ITS, LSU, rpb1) demonstrates a sister group relationship with the holotype of C. rubrobasalis.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Cortinarius    South America    Morphology    Phylogeny    Secondary metabolites    Anthraquinones    Photoantimicrobial activity    

1 Introduction

South American Nothofagaceae forests are hot spots for the ectomycorrhizal fungal genus Cortinarius. More than 260 Cortinarius species have been described so far from Southern Chile and Argentina [18]. The systematics of Cortinarius have led to inconsistent definitions in the past. Especially the delimitation of the taxon Dermocybe within the Cortinarii has been debated for now 200 years and underwent many changes. Dermocybe was first described in 1821 by E. M. Fries [9] as a subgenus of Cortinarius. Influenced by different weighing of morphological/microscopical properties and pigment composition, Dermocybe was in a constant state of discrepancy as to whether this group should be considered as a separate genus or a subgenus of Cortinarius [1015]. Modern approaches towards a more natural taxonomic characterization of species complexes in Cortinarius can be achieved through DNA-based phylogeny [6, 1623] or the analysis of genomic data, which recognizes Dermocybe as a subgenus in Cortinarius [24]. Very recently, a molecular revision of central European dermocyboid Cortinarius species combined DNA- and pigment-based information [25]. For South American Cortinarii, this phylogenetic DNA-based approach has so far only been applied for a few species [2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 22], still leaving a broad field of research. In addition, secondary metabolites of the South American dermocyboid Cortinarii are still widely unexplored. In the past, comparative thin layer chromatography analysis revealed the presence of anthraquinones as a characteristic feature of South American dermocyboid taxa [2628]. More recently, monomeric and dimeric (pre-) anthraquinones were isolated from Dermocybe nahuelbutensis [29] and their structures were elucidated by mass spectrometric and NMR spectroscopic methods.

During our ongoing studies of Chilean dermocyboid Cortinarii species in Nothofagus forests, we collected an unknown species phenotypically very similar to the New Zealand species Cortinarius veronicae Soop [30]. The present study describes this new species as Cortinarius mapuveronicae based on morphological and microscopical attributes, molecular phylogeny, and chemical analysis of secondary metabolites. Finally, the isolated compounds were tested for selected biological photoactivities. We are therefore able to present an integrative taxonomical approach to describe this interesting fungus from the Andean-Patagonian region of South America.

2 Results

In the following we will present a polythetic taxonomical approach of a description of the new species. The classical phylogenetic and taxonomic description is complemented by a chemical approach and a test for bioactivity.

2.1 Phylogenetic placement of Cortinarius mapuveronicae

Both phylogenetic analyses confirmed Cortinarius mapuveronicae as a distinct lineage within the genus Cortinarius. The alignment of the larger concatenated dataset (ITS, LSU, rpb1) contains 134 sequences and 2282 positions (ITS bp 1–815, LSU 816–1765, the rpb1 1766–2282). Here, C. mapuveronicae falls in a supported (1/77) clade with C. rubrobasalis. Tree topologies indicate a relationship of this lineage to the sections Dermocybe [29] and Pauperae (see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S50).

The second, smaller alignment included closely related taxa of C. mapuveronicae only (44 samples), and was based on rDNA sequences (ITS, LSU) and 1225 positions (ITS 1–658, LSU 659–1225) (Fig. 1). This phylogenetic analysis substantiates C. mapuveronicae as a distinct species with sister group relationship to C. rubrobasalis, although the placement is supported only by tree topologies. More importantly, it clearly shows that C. mapuveronicae is distinct from similar taxa with red basidiomata like C. teresae and C. veronicae. C. rubrobasalis can easily be misidentified as shown by a C. teresae, which was wrongly named C. rubrobasalis (Fig. 1: IBF20230155 vs TUB011471).

Fig. 1

Maximum likelihood (RAxML) phylogenetic tree of selected Cortinarius taxa showing the distinct position of Cortinarius mapuveronicae compared to morphologically similar taxa. Shown is the best ML tree with bootstrap values (BS > 60) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP > 0.60) provided above the branches. The dataset contains 44 samples and consists of concatenated nrITS and nrLSU sequences. Voucher numbers and geographical provenance are included in labels. Sequences originating from holotype vouchers are printed in bold

2.2 Taxonomy

Cortinarius mapuveronicae N. Arnold, Palfner, Peintner, Huymann, Siewert sp. nov. (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5)

Fig. 2

Basidiomata of Cortinarius mapuveronicae, a: fresh basidiomata of the holotype IBF20230110; b: positive alkaline reaction on pileus and stipe of the holotype collection IBF20230110; c: collection IBF20220064; d: collection IBF20220073

Fig. 3

Micrographs of diagnostic features of Cortinarius mapuveronicae (CONCF 2241, isotype); a: pileipellis in cross section in KOH (5%), some hyphae turned purplish (arrowhead); scale bar = 40 µm; b: basidiospores in water, scale bar = 10 µm; c: basidiospores turned purplish brown after addition of KOH (5%), scale bar = 10 µm

Fig. 4

a, b: SEM pictures of basidiospores of Cortinarius mapuveronicae (IBF2023110), holotype; scale bar = 5 µm

Fig. 5

Line drawings of diagnostic features of Cortinarius mapuveronicae (CONCF 2241, isotype); a: basidiospores; scale bar = 10 µm; b: basidia; scale bar = 10 µm; c: pileipellis in cross section; scale bar = 20 µm

Etymology: In Mapudungun, the traditional native language in southern Chile and Argentina, "mapu" means "land", circumscribing the native territory, and is a geographical reference to the region where the species was first encountered; the word element "veronicae" was chosen because of the phenotypic similarity to the Australian species Cortinarius veronicae.

Diagnosis: C. mapuveronicae differs from phylogenetically related Australian species by the habitat under Nothofagus dombeyi and Lophozonia obliqua in Andean-Patagonian forests. The striking orange-red fruitbodies are characteristic for C. mapuveronicae. C. teresae and C. rubrobasalis are other red colored Cortinarii, with red tinge and positive alkaline reaction from this habitat and area, however, the basidiospores of C. mapuveronicae have a unique, distinctive purplish reaction when observed in the microscope with KOH (3%), which is lacking in C. rubrobasalis and C. teresae. Moreover, C. mapuveronicae can be distinguished from C. rubrobasalis by the pale pink or peach-colored to orange lamellae, and by a red to purplish red alkaline reaction, while C. rubrobasalis has yellow–brown lamellae when young, and a dark brown to blackish alkaline reaction. C. teresae has more purplish-red basidiomata when compared to C. mapuveronicae.

Type: Chile, Aysen Region, Chaíten, close to the Carretera Austral (Ruta 7), S 43° 20′ 55.932'', W 72° 23′ 59.927'', 635 m asl, mixed forest dominated by Nothofagus dombeyi, growing on soil and litter; 09.04.2023; leg.: L. Huymann, U. Peintner, B. Siewert, det.: N. Arnold, G. Palfner L. Huymann, U. Peintner, Holotype IBF20230110, Isotype CONCF 2241; GenBank: PQ859656 (ITS), PX230468 (LSU), PX240688 (rpb1).

Macroscopic description: Pileus: (2.7) 4.3 ± 1.0 (6.5) cm wide; hemispherical to broadly convex, young convex to bluntly conical, margin sometimes enrolled; not hygrophanous, dry and fresh with a greasy shine and texture, innately fibrous, slimy when wet; disc of pileus dark red or bright dark red-brown (S15/S17), sometimes paler red-brown (S13/T13), towards margin bright cherry red (R15/R17); older basidiomata with lighter red margin (P19/P20), rim orange light red (N20/M20) to pale pink or salmon, slightly translucently striate, especially at the margin. Lamellae: straight, closely spaced, margin sometimes saw-toothed and wavy (possibly due to drying), young pink to light red (N19/N20) orange (2.5YR 6/8) and even brighter, pink-salmon (N15/N17/N20), old lively orange-brown, edge same color or slightly lighter, slowly turning purple when bruised. Stipe: (4.7) 8.1 ± 2.0 (10.8) cm x (1.0) 1.2 ± 0.2 (1.6) cm, cylindrical, slightly club-shaped or spindle-shaped, apex pale beige-pink (K29), silky, lower portion slightly pink-brown (P37), lower two thirds covered with girdles of dark/bright fox-orange-red (R17/P19/P39) velum fibers¸ turning slightly grayish brown–red (P49/N49) upon touch, especially at the base; base lemon yellow with attached yellow mycelium. Context: in the cap uniformly pale red-brown (S13/S15), ochre (yellow–red) (N57), stipe soon hollow, light yellow-orange, inside the cavity pink-red and fibrous (N20), also often already decayed in small specimens, slightly pink at the margin (M27); base fiery orange-red (P19), very young olive-green (P65), pale towards the base, slightly yellowing. Velum: dark red or fox-red to slightly paler (P19). Cortina: pale pinkish white. Color changes: flesh in the stipe slowly turning yellow. Taste: not specific. Macrochemical reactions: with KOH 30% red to purplish magenta-red, on lamellae red–purple, pileus context brown, pileipellis red–purple dark violet. UV-fluorescence: negative.

Microscopic description: Basidiospores (Figs. 3b, 3c, 4, 5a) (8.1) 9.8 ± 0.6 (11.0) × (4.4) 5.8 ± 0.3 (6.6), Q = 1.7 ± 0.1 (n = 171, holotype), (7.9) 9.4 ± 0.6 (11.1) × (4.4) 5.8 ± 0.3 (6.9), Q = 1.6 ± 0.1 (n = 482, all collections), ellipsoid to subamygdaloid, yellowish brown in water, verruculose, almost smooth with light microscopy, more coarsely verrucose towards the apex. Basidia (Figs. 3b, 5) clavate, tetrasporic, 28.6–33.0–35.8 × 6.4–7.5–8.6 µm (n = 20). Cheilocystidia or pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis (Figs. 3a, 5c) consisting of cylindrical, occasionally ramified, hyphae with clamp connections, 3–8 µm in diameter, up to 22 µm in deeper layers. Chemical reactions: most basidiospores turning purplish brown in KOH (5%) within about one minute, some hyphae of the pileipellis also turning purplish in KOH.

Ecology and distribution: Supposedly ectomycorrhizal, associated with Nothofagus dombeyi and Lophozonia obliqua. Growing in small groups, terrestrial. So far only recorded in Chile.

Additional specimens examined: Chile, Cañete, coord. 37°48′31.3"S, 73°09′38.2"W, leg. N. Arnold, 18.05.2022 (IPB-CHL 43/22); coord. 37°41′23.208''S, 73°21′35.85''W, leg. U. Peintner, L. Huymann, N. Arnold, 18.05.2022 (IBF20220073); coord. 37°49′03.9"S, 73°05′21.5"W, leg. N. Arnold, 28.05.2022 (IPB-CHL 92/22); coord. 37°31′21.7''S, 72°23′58.16''W, leg. J. Farias, 28.05.2022 (CONCF 2069); Caramavida, Arauco Province, coord. 37°41′42.4"S, 73°07′52.7"W, leg. N. Arnold, 08.05.2022 (IPB-CHL 32/22); Curanilahue, Trongol Alto, coord. 37°41′23.208''S, 73°21′35.85''W, leg. U. Peintner, L. Huymann, N. Arnold, 17.05.2022 (IBF20220064); coord. 37°41′23.208''S, 73°21′35.85''W, leg. U. Peintner, L. Huymann, N. Arnold, 21.05.2022 (IBF20220104); coord. 37°33′19.1"S, 73°11′00.1"W, leg. N. Arnold, 21.05.2022 (IPB-CHL 51/22); coord. 37°31′21.72''S, 72°23′58.16''W, leg. J. Farias, 18.06.2022 (CONCF 2088); coord. 37°31′21.7''S, 72°23′58.16''W, leg. J. Farias, 26.06.2022 (CONCF 2088B); La Union, Ranco Province, coord. 40°13′32.1"S, 73°21′36.9"W, leg. N. Arnold, 03.05.2018 (IPB-CHL 9/18); coord. 40°13′32.5"S, 73°21′35.7"W, leg. N. Arnold, 30.04.2022 (IPB-CHL 11/22); coord. 40°13′33.2"S, 73°21′35.4"W, leg. N. Arnold, 13.05.2023 (IPB-CHL 19/23); Llancacura, coord. 40°13′32.916''S, 73°21′35.63''W, leg. U. Peintner, L. Huymann, N. Arnold, 14.05.2022 (IBF20220019); coord. 40°13′32.916''S, 73°21′35.63''W, leg. U. Peintner, L. Huymann, N. Arnold, 14.05.2022 (IBF20220020); Los Álamos, Caramahuida, coord. 37°31′21.7''S, 72°23′58.16''W, leg. N. Arnold, 21.05.2017 (CONCF 1787); Nahuelbuta, Arauco Province, coord. 37°49′38.1"S, 73°00′36.6"W, leg. N. Arnold, 01.05.2018 (IPB-CHL 46/18); coord. 37°49′39.1"S, 73°00′35.6"W, leg. N. Arnold, 26.05.2018 (IPB-CHL 61/18); Chaíten, coord. 43°20′55.932''S, 73°10′18.73''W, leg. L. Huymann, B. Siewert, U. Peintner, 09.04.2023 (IBF20230090); coord. 43°20′48.408''S, 72°23′59.92''W, leg. L. Huymann, B. Siewert, U. Peintner, 09.04.2023 (IBF20230104); coord. 43°20′55.932''S, 73°10′18.73''W, leg. L. Huymann, B. Siewert, U. Peintner, 09.04.2023 (IBF20230110 holotype, CONCF 2241 isotype); coord. 43°20′48.408''S, 72°23′59.92''W, leg. L. Huymann, B. Siewert, U. Peintner, 09.04.2023 (IBF20230111); coord. 43°20′48.408''S, 72°23′59.92''W, leg. L. Huymann, B. Siewert, U. Peintner, 09.04.2023 (IBF20230112);

Notes: The species falls in a clade with C. rubrobasalis (BPP 1, BS 77), another species from South-America with quite similar red basidiomata. However, the sequences originating from the holotypes of C. rubrobasalis (IBF19630173) and C. mapuveronicae (IBF20230110) do have 16 differences in the ITS sequences and only 97.22% common identity.

The color change of the basidiospores to purplish brown after addition of KOH is a distinctive feature of C. mapuveronicae which has rarely been reported from other Cortinarii, such as C. anthracinus (Fr.) E. Berger [31]. The morphologically similar species C. rubrobasalis and C. teresae do not share this attribute.

C. rubrobasalis has a dark brown KOH reaction on the pileus surface, the flesh of the base is immediately turning black [1], whereas C. mapuveronicae has a purplish magenta red reaction. C. teresae has more purplish-red basidiomata when compared to C. mapuveronicae.

C. mapuveronicae has some resemblances to C. veronicae K. Soop from New Zealand. This species has more orange-red lamellae, and an alkaline reaction, which is olive-grey on the surface and less purplish magenta red [3, 30], furthermore the basidiospores are more broadly elliptic (5.7–7.7 × 5–5.7 µm), and the habitat on different continents (South America compared to New Zealand / Australia) is clearly distinctive.

2.3 Isolation and structural elucidation of compounds 1–10

Repeated column chromatography of the crude extract resulting from combined collections of C. mapuveronicae (Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Tab. S3) on Sephadex LH 20 and Sephadex LH 60, Polyamide SC 6-Ac, silica gel 60, RP18 modified silica gel, and SPE on dimethyl-modified silica gel yielded anthraquinoid compounds 110.

Compound (1) was isolated as red amorphous solid. Its high-resolution negative-ion ESIMS spectrum exhibited a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 343.0462 ([M − H] (calculated for C17H11O8, 343.0532), consistent with the formula C17H12O8 and corresponding to 12 degrees of unsaturation. (Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S2).

HRESIMSn analysis of 1 in negative mode displayed characteristic ions at m/z 299 [M − H − CO2]and m/z 284 [M − H − CO2 − CH3]●− correlating to losses of the carboxyl and a radical methyl (Fig. 6). Further fragmentation is characterized by losses of CO and CO2 (m/z 256 [M − H − CO2 − CH3 − CO]●−, m/z 240 [M − H − CO2− CH 3 − CO2]●−, m/z 228 [M − H − CO2 − CH3 − CO − CO]●−, and m/z 212 [M − H − CO2 − CH3 − CO − CO2]), similar to emodin (3) as reported in literature [32].

Fig. 6

Key ions in the negative HRESIMSn spectra of clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1)

The structure of 1 was further determined on the basis of detailed NMR analysis (Table 1; Figs. 7 ab; Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S3–S7). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 show resonances from two phenolic hydroxy groups (δH 14.03, s, OH; 13.48, s, OH), two isolated signals from two aromatic methine groups (δH 7.57, s, H-4; δH 6.94, s, H-7), and resonances of a methyl group attached to a carbon (δH 2.42, s, H-12, δC 20.0, C-12) and a methyl group connected to oxygen (δH 3.91, s, H-13; δC 56.7, C-13). The 13C NMR data complements these assignments and in particular confirms the presence of two quinonoid carbonyls (δC 189.4, C-9; 186.0, C-10) and one carboxyl (δC 167.4, C-11) in the molecule. The placement of the substituents in the rings of the anthraquinone scaffold could be deduced from 1H-13C HMBC and NOE experiments. The 1H-13C HMBC spectrum shows in accordance with NOE correlations cross peaks of H-4 with C-3, OH-1 with C-1, C-9a, and C-2. Further 1H-13C HMBC cross peaks of H-4 to C-2, C-11, C-12, and H-12 to C-2, C-3, and C-4 confirmed the substitution pattern of ring A. Ring B is characterized by two carbonyl moieties at C-9 and C-10, and four quaternary carbons C-4a, C-8a, C-9a, and C-10a. NOE correlation of H-7 to H-13 and 1H-13C HMBC cross peaks of the hydroxyl group OH-5 with C-5, C-6 and C-10a finalized the substitution pattern in ring C. In addition, the position of the methoxy group at C-8 was supported by a demethylation reaction of 1 to clavorubin (11), which shows 1H-13C HMBC cross peaks of the resulting hydroxy OH-8 to C-8a (Fig. 6c; Table 1; Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S49). The OH-6 resonances in 1 could not be observed in the 1H NMR spectrum but is determined through the chemical shift of C-6 in 13C NMR spectrum as well as by HMBC cross peaks of OH-5 to C-6. The obtained spectral data of the semisynthetic compound 11 were in agreement with those reported by Gill et al. [33]. Therefore, the structure of 1 was recognized as a new natural acidic anthraquinone methylether of clavorubin (11) and consequently named clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1).

Table 1

NMR spectroscopic data (500/125 MHz, THF-d8 and DMSO-d6, δ in ppm) of 1 and 11

Pos 1 11
δC, typea δH (J in Hz)a HMBCa δC, typea δH (J in Hz)b δH (J in Hz)a HMBCa
1 160.6, C–OH 14.03, s, 1H 1, 2, 3, 9a 160.1, C–OH 12.65, s, 1H 12.63, s, 1H 1, 2, 9a
2 131.9, C 132.0, C
3 143.4, C 144.9, C
4 119.5, CH 7.57, s, 1H 2, 3, 9, 9a, 10, 11 121.0, CH 7.73, s, 1H 7.71, s, 1H 1, 2, 3, 9a, 10, 11, 12
4a 132.9, qC 133.8, qC
5 156.2, C–OH 13.47, s, 1H 5, 6, 10a 158.5, C–OH 13.34, s, 1H 12.49, s, 1H 7, 8, 8a
6 148.3, C–OH c 150.5, C–OH c c
7 108.7, CH 6.94, s, 1H 5, 6, 7, 8, 8a, 10 111.2, CH 6.76, s, 1H 6.66, s, 1H 5, 6, 8, 8a, 9
8 158.9, C 162.2, C–OH 12.49, s, 1H 13.44, s, 1H 5, 6, 10a
8a 110.4, qC 106.2, qC
9 189.4, C 189.0, C
9a 116.4, qC 115.6, qC
10 186.0, C 187.6, C
10a 116.1, qC 113.5, qC
11 167.4, C c 167.1, C c c
12 20.0, C 2.42, s, 3H 1, 2, 3, 4, 11 20.2, C 2.51, s, 3H 2.46, s, 3H 1d, 2, 3, 4, 9ad, 11d
13 56.7, C 3.91, s, 3H 8
aMeasured in THF-d8
bMeasured in DMSO-d6
cNot observed
dWeak 1H-13C-HMBC cross peaks

Fig. 7

a: Structure of clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1); b: key HMBC (plain arrow) and NOE (dashed arrow) correlations of clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1); c: key HMBC (arrow) of clavorubin (11)

The UV spectrum of clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1) exhibits four maxima [UV (MeOH) λmax = 205 nm, 237 nm, 262 nm, 490 nm (Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S8)]. Spotted on TLC, clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1) appears as an orange-red spot showing no fluorescence under UV-light (λ = 366 nm). By treating the spot with ammonia vapor a bathochromic shift to violet can be observed (Bornträger reaction; Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S1 a–d). Due to the high occurrence of 1 (18.3 mg isolated from 212 g d.w. fruiting bodies), clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1) is the most prominent pigment in C. mapuveronicae.

Isolated compounds 210 (Fig. 7) were identified based on their spectroscopic data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRESIMSn, CD; Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S9-S49, Tab. S2) and comparison by TLC with authentic reference compounds as (+)-7,7-emodinphyscion (2) [29], emodin (3) [34], emodin-6,8-di-O-methylether (4) [35], questin (5) [36], (+)-(S)-skyrin (6) [37], (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7) [38], hypericin (8) [39], dermolutein (9) [40], and endocrocin (10) [40]. The obtained spectral data of the isolated compounds 210 were in agreement with those reported in the relevant references. The comparative analysis of the calculated and experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of compounds 2 and 7 showed a strong agreement between the experimental ECD spectrum and the calculated spectrum of (+)-7,7'-emodinphyscion (Fig. 8, 9), with a similarity factor of S = 0.72 (σ = 0.21 eV at 18 nm shift) and (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (Fig. 9, 10), with a similarity factor of S = 0.8372 (σ = 0.3 eV at 31 nm shift), respectively.

Fig. 8

Structures of isolated compounds 210

Fig. 9

Calculated ECD spectra of the (+)-7,7'-emodinphyscion (2, red) and (−)-7,7'-emodinphyscion (green) isomers in comparison with the experimental spectra (black)

Fig. 10

Calculated CD spectra of (+)-(S) aurantioskyrin (7, red) and (–)-(R)-aurantioskyrin (green) isomers in comparison with the experimental spectra (black)

2.4 Photoantimicrobial activity of isolated compounds 1–10

The isolated compounds were photobiologically evaluated employing a recently established protocol [41]. All experiments were performed as biological triplicates of technical triplicates. As depicted in Table 2, next to the known photoantimicrobial active compound from dermocyboid Cortinarii emodin (3) [42], (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7), and hypericin (8) were found. Furthermore, (+)-(S)-skyrin (6), showed significant light-enhanced activity, although a PhotoMIC (photoinduced minimal inhibitory concentration) could not be determined in the tested concentration range cmax = 5 mg/L.

Table 2

PhotoMIC [mg/L] of compounds 110 against the human pathogens S. aureus, and C. albicans observed under dark and irradiated (λ = 478 nm; H = 30 J/cm2) conditions in broth micro-dilution assay. (see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S53)

Compound S. aureus C. albicans
Dark (MIC) Irradiated (PhotoMIC) Dark (MIC) Irradiated (PhotoMIC)
Clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1)
(+)-7,7´-Emodinphyscion (2)
Emodin (3) 0.5 2.5
Emodin-6,8-di-O-methylether (4)
Questin (5)
(+)-(S)-Skyrin (6)
(+)-(S)-Aurantioskyrin (7) 5
Hypericin (8) 2.5
Dermolutein (9)
Endocrocin (10) –s
Fluconazole n.d n.d 0.5 n.d
Chloramphenicol 15 n.d n.d n.d
“n.d.” = not determined; “- “ not active under test conditions (cmax = 5 µg/mL)

In the next step, the photocytotoxicity was examined, employing cell cultures of two different human cancer cell lines. The test was based on a modified sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay [43], as published elsewhere [44]. In short, the cells were treated with different test concentrations 24 h after seeding and incubated for 24 h. After the incubation time, fresh media were supplied and one of two identically prepared plates was irradiated (λ = 478 nm, H = 30 J/cm2, tPI = 30 min). Cell fixation followed by SRB staining was performed after an additional 48 h. As depicted in Table 3, photocytotoxic activity was observed for emodin (3), (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7), and hypericin (8).

Table 3

Cell viability of T24 and A549 carcinoma cells under blue light irradiation (BL; λ = 478 nm; H = 5.2 J/cm2) and dark condition (D) given as EC50 (Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S52, Tab. S5)

3 Discussion

Our concatenated phylogenetic analysis (see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S50) places the lineage of the two South American sister taxa C. mapuveronicae and C. rubrobasalis in a large, weakly supported dermocyboid group (BPP 0.69). This group was already detected in an earlier study [3]. Our results also confirm earlier hypotheses of a possible common origin of dermocyboid species, as this group contains both, Southern hemisphere lineages (sections Orixanthi, Icterinula, Walkeri, Chrysmata, Cruentoides, Pauperae, Rubrobasales, Ignelli) and Northern hemisphere lineages (sections Dermocybe, Olivaceopicti). Some Southern hemisphere species without clear affiliation to a defined section, like C. promethenus, C. cramesinus, C. elaiops, C. aurantioferreus, C. mycenarum, and C. cardinalis also belong to this large group which is characterized by small dermocyboid basidiomata and positive alkaline reactions, although anthraquinonoid pigments were reported only for few of them [1, 27, 33, 38, 40].

Cortinarius mapuveronicae has a sister group relationship to the holotype of C. rubrobasalis. The sequencing of the type of C. rubrobasalis allowed to correct a taxonomical error in the database: The sequence deposited as C. rubrobasalis TUB11487 has 58 base differences in the ITS region when compared to the sequence from the type of C. rubrobasalis IBF1963173 but is identical to C. teresae IBF20230155, which forms a lineage with C. carneolus IPB-CH 41/17, TUB011471. Unfortunately, this lineage was wrongly named sect. Rubrobasales based on the misidentification and needs to be renamed in future studies.

As already proposed by Soop and colleagues, Northern Hemisphere dermocyboid Cortinarii fall into Sect. Dermocybe, which has a distinct evolutionary history clearly differing from all Southern Hemisphere lineages [23]. Moreover, our analysis also indicates a separate evolutionary history of South-American dermocyboid Cortinarii: they are closely related, but do not form mixed lineages with Southern hemisphere species from Australia or New Zealand. However, species sampling is still comparatively poor, when compared to dermocyboid taxa from the Northern Hemisphere.

The orange-red major anthraquinoid pigment 1 is most likely responsible for the red–orange color of the basidiomata of C. mapuveronicae and could be identified as the new naturally occurring clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1) based on the intensive mass spectrometric and NMR spectroscopic investigations. Clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1) represents the pigment chemical link of C. mapuveronicae to the Australian Dermocybe spp. via the core structure of clavorubin (11) [33]. Clavorubin (11) was first isolated from Claviceps purpurea by Frank and co-workers [45, 46] and later recognized in Cortinarius sp. WAT 24273 and Cortinarius sp. WAT 26645 [33]. We were allowed to sequence material of Cortinarius sp. WAT 26645 and could identify it as Cortinarius veronicae (see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Tab. S1).

Besides clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1), a series of known monomeric and dimeric anthraquinones could be isolated from C. mapuveronicae in variable amounts. The yellow neutral anthraquinones emodin (3), emodin-6,8-di-O-methylether (4), and questin (5) were present in C. mapuveronicae in small quantities. Whereby the precursor of the neutral anthraquinone series emodin (3) occurs in species from all four continental areas [2529, 38, 39, 4749], emodin-6,8-di-O-methylether (4) and questin (5) could be only detected in species from Europe so far. [38]

The neutral dimeric anthraquinones (+)-7,7'-emodinphyscion (2), (+)-(S)-skyrin (6), and (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7) could be isolated as minor pigments from C. mapuveronicae. (+)-7,7'-emodinphyscion (2) [28] seems to be restricted to dermocyboid Cortinarii originating from Patagonia, whereas (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7) could be isolated so far only from the European phlegmacioid Cortinarius atrovirens [38]. (+)-(S)-Skyrin (6) is recognized in dermocyboid Cortinarii from Patagonian South America [28, 29] and Australasia [27, 29, 38, 50], and some European phlegmacioid Cortinarius species [38].

As representatives of the monomeric acidic anthraquinones, dermolutein (9) and endocrocin (10) are present in C. mapuveronicae. The pigments dermolutein (9) and endocrocin (10) occur in several European species [38] and in the Australian C. cardinalis [40]. It can be suggested, that the enzymatic O-methylation in position 8 of the anthraquinone core seems to be more likely in the dermocyboid C. mapuveronicae through the occurrence of dermolutein (9), clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1), and questin (5). The naphtodianthrone hypericin (8) was obtained in small quantities from C. mapuveronicae. The occurrence of hypericin (8) seems to be restricted to species from Patagonian South America and Australasia and could so far not be detected in European and North American dermocyboid Cortinarii [5154].

As a remarkable finding, anthraquinones connected to saccharides, mainly in the form of 1-β-D-glucopyranoside, known from European and North American species [38, 42, 48, 49, 54], could not be detected in the Patagonian C. mapuveronicae. Furthermore, anthraquinone disaccharides are also absent in C. mapuveronicae and have only been found in Australian dermocyboid Cortinarii [55]. The phylogenetic similarity of C. mapuveronicae and C. rubrobasalis has not been verified by pigment-chemical investigations of the latter.

To explore the functional implications of these pigments, we investigated whether the photoantimicrobial activity observed in Northern Hemisphere and Australian specimens arises exclusively from the known fungal photosensitizer emodin (3) and the hypericin (8), or if other pigment classes contribute synergistically to this trait.

In detail, a (photo)antimicrobial and (photo)cytotoxic assay were performed on all isolated compounds (Table 3) The (photo)antimicrobial assay is based on the CLSI and EUCAST microdilution protocol and thus the MIC obtained can be well correlated with the values published by EUCAST. As reference antibiotic chloramphenicol was chosen, which has a MIC of 15 mg/L (c = 46.6 µM) against the strain and is therefore still susceptible, and as antifungal agent fluconazole, which has a MIC of 0.5 mg/L (c = 1.6 µM). Highly potent candidates were identified with a photo-activated minimum inhibitory concentration (PhotoMIC) of 0.5 (1.9 µM), 5 (c = 9.0 µM) and 2.5 (5.0 µM) mg/L for 3, 7 and 8, respectively. A cut-off test concentration of c = 5 mg/L was chosen to allow identification of only truly active compounds within the range of potent antimicrobials.

A similar trend was observed in the (photo) cytotoxicity screen, confirming the photo-enhanced effect of these fungal anthraquinones. The modest photo-active effect of 3 can be attributed to the chosen light source; the peak wavelength of the irradiation setup used was λ = 478 nm (FWHM = 27 nm). The absorption maximum of 3 in a polar solvent (methanol) was characterized as λmax (ε) = 436 (10,724). Consequently, the probability of absorption is lower under the chosen setup and explains the observed photobiological effect.

The uncovering of the newly identified fungal photosensitizer (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7) proves that the photoantimicrobial property is not only due to known light-activated pigments, but that distinctly different photosensitizers have evolved in the South American dermocyboid Cortinarii. Phylogenetic patterns reveal distinct lineages, and closely related species do have similar pigment patterns [27]. However, pigment chemistry as detected in dermocyboid Cortinarii suggests more diverse pathways of biosynthesis of anthraquinonoid secondary metabolites which seem to be correlated with geographical regions and specific lineages on both hemispheres.

4 Experimental

4.1 General experimental procedures

Column chromatography was performed on Sephadex LH 20 (Fluka, Germany), Sephadex LH 60 (Fluka, Germany), silica gel (0.040–0.063 mm, Merck, Germany), C18 modified silica gel (LiChroPrep RP18, 40–63 μm, Merck, Germany), and Polyamide SC 6-Ac (Macherey & Nagel, Germany). For solid phase extraction Chromabond C2 cartridges (Macherey & Nagel, Germany) were used. Analytical TLC was performed on pre-coated silica gel F254 aluminum sheets (Merck, Germany) using toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v) as solvent system. Compound spots were analyzed by their absorbance at long-wavelength UV light (λ = 366 nm) and short-wavelength UV light (λ = 254 nm), as well as their color reaction on TLC by treating with ammonia vapor.

Analytical and semi-preparative RP-HPLC were performed on a Shimadzu prominence system consisting of an SPD-M20A diode array detector, a FRC-10A fraction collector, a CBM-20A communications bus module, a DGU-20A5R degassing unit, an LC-20AT liquid chromatograph, and an SIL-20A HT auto sampler. Chromatographic separation was performed using a semi-preparative Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB C18 column (ID 10.0 mm, length 250 mm, particle size 5 µm) using ultrapure water (TKA ultrapure water system) and acetonitrile as eluents both acidified with 0.1% formic acid.

UV spectra were recorded on a Jasco V-560 UV/Vis spectrophotometer and CD spectra were obtained from a Jasco J-815 CD spectrophotometer. The specific rotation was measured with a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter.

1H, 13C and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance Neo 500 NMR spectrometer at 500.234 and 125.797 MHz, respectively, using a 5 mm prodigy probe with TopSpin 4.0.7 and TopSpin 4.3.0 spectrometer software. For 2D NMR standard pulse sequences (hsqcedetgpsisp2.3, hmbcgplpndqf, roesyphpp.2 and noesygpphpp) were used.

1H chemical shifts are referenced to internal TMS (1H δ = 0.0 ppm), 13C chemical shifts to THF-d8 (13C δ = 67.4 ppm), pyridine-d5 (13C δ = 123.5 ppm) and DMSO-d6 (13C δ = 39.7 ppm).

The negative ion high-resolution ESI mass spectra were obtained from an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an HESI electrospray ion source (spray voltage 3.0 and 4.0 kV, capillary temperature 275 ℃, source heater temperature 40 ℃; FTMS resolution 60.000). Nitrogen was used as sheath gas. The sample solutions were introduced continuously via a 500 μL Hamilton syringe pump with a flow rate of 5 μL min–1. The instrument was externally calibrated by the Pierce® LTQ Velos ESI positive ion calibration solution (product number 88323) and Pierce® ESI negative ion calibration solution (product number 88324) from Thermofisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, 61,105 USA). The data were evaluated by the Xcalibur software 2.7 SP1 and 2.2 SP1.

The incubation step of the DNA extractions was done with an Eppendorf Thermomixer comfort (Eppendorf AG, Germany), and the centrifugation with an Eppendorf centrifuge 5415 R (Eppendorf AG, Germany). For the PCRs a Thermocycler Peqlab Primus 96 advanced (Peqlab Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) was used. The results of the PCR were checked with an electrophorese chamber RunOne Casting System (Embi Tec, San Diego, California, USA) and the Bio Rad Gel Doc EZ Imager 1,708,270 together with the Bio Rad Blue sample tray (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA).

Samples of emodin (3), emodin-6,8-di-O-methylether (4), questin (5), (+)-(S)-skyrin (6), (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7), hypericin (8), dermolutein (9), and endocrocin (10) originating from Steglich's group (Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany), were available from the in-house compound library of the Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle (Saale), Germany.

4.2 Fungal material

For a list of all specimens, and their voucher, GenBank and collection dates, examined in this study see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Tab. S1. Basidiomata of C. mapuveronicae were collected in Chile, Biobío Region, Arauco Province, Cordillera de Nahuelbuta, and Los Rios Region, Ranco Province, ascent to Reserva Costera Valdiviana, growing on soil and leaf litter beneath Nothofagus dombeyi (Mirb.) Oerst and Lophozonia obliqua (Mirb.) Heenan & Smissen. Voucher specimens are deposited at the Fungarium of Concepción University (CONCF) in Concepcion, Chile, in the Fungarium of the Tiroler Landesmuseen (IBF), Hall, Austria, and at the Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry (IPB), Halle, Germany.

4.3 Morphological analysis

All features were noted from the fresh basidiomata and the colors were described after the "Code des Couleurs" [56] and the "Munsell Soil Color Chart" [57]. For macro-chemical reactions KOH 30% was used. Possible fluorescence under UV was observed at wavelengths 250 nm and 350 nm with dry material. Light microscopy was carried out with a Nikon Eclipse 600 with fresh material or dried material soaked in water or KOH 3% before visualization. Measurements were carried out using the imaging software Nis-Elements D (Nikon Europe B.V.). Basidiospores were measured in KOH 3% with a 100 × oil immersions objective. At least 30 spores were measured per collection, and 170 of the holotype, in order to allow for statistical evaluation of spore size. The length/width ratio Q was calculated. Measurements are presented in the following: (min) MV ± sd (max) x (min) MV ± sd (max) Q value ± sd (n = x). For basidiospore sizes of all measured collections see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Tab. S4. All other microscopic attributes were analyzed from isotype material (CONCF 2241/ IBF20230110) with a Leitz Dialux compound microscope. For the SEM pictures of the spores a piece of lamellae was dried with a BAL-TEC CPD 030 Critical point dryer. After mounting, they were gold sputtered using a BAL-TEC MED 020 Coating system and he images were taken using a Zeiss DSM 982 Gemini Scanning Electron Microscope.

4.4 Molecular analysis

DNA extraction was done with the CTAB method using dried material [58, 59]. A Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done with different primers for the rDNA ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 sequences the primers ITS1 and ITS4 [60] was used. The rDNA LSU region was amplified with the primer combination LR0R and LR7 [60]. The amplifications of RPB1 domain were made with the Cortinarius specific primer combination RPB1-cort119bF and RPB1-cort92b6R [61]. Sequences were assembled and edited with Geneious [62]. As a first step, a Blast search was conducted in UNITE (https://unite.ut.ee/) and GenBank (http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and sequences of closely related Cortinarius species or with similar morphology were then downloaded. A total of 19 ITS sequences were 5 LSU and 3 rpb1 sequences generated in this study. The newly generated sequences were submitted to GenBank (Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Tab. S1).

4.5 Phylogenetic analysis

The different loci (ITS; LSU; rpb1) were aligned with the online version of MAFFT 7 [63] for ITS and rpb1 loci with the E-INS-i algorithm and for the LSU locus with G-INS-i algorithm, all under default settings. Then they were checked and adjusted in Geneious Prime 2025.0.3.

Two final datasets were created: The first multigene alignment was made to show the deeper relationships to other Cortinarius species. Therefore, all three single loci alignments (ITS, LSU, rpb1) were concatenated. The second one, with only selected species and two loci (ITS, LSU) served for a better delimitation of species. As outgroup for the first dataset (ITS, LSU, rpb1), sect. Austroduracinus with C. austroduracinus and C. viscincisus was chosen [3]. Cortinarius veronicae was chosen as outgroup for the second dataset (ITS, LSU analysis).

For each of the datasets, a ML tree was calculated using RAxML [64]. To further evaluate branch robustness a Bayesian interference tree was calculated using MrBayes [65]. ML analysis was carried out based on the best model (first dataset = GTR + G, second dataset = GTR + G + I), rapid Bootstrap analyses were conducted with 1000 replications. For each dataset, two separate MrBayes runs were run under the general time-reversible model with gamma-distributed rate variation. Runs included four incrementally heated chains, they were run for 5 million generations each, sampling every 100 generations and with the first 1.25 million generations discarded as burn-in.

4.6 Pigment extraction and isolation

Air-dried fruiting bodies of C. mapuveronicae (coll. IPB-CHL 9/18, 46/18, 61/18, 11/22, 32/22, 43/22, 51/22, 92/22, 19/23 (Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Tab. S3), combined 212 g, were crushed using a blender and exhaustively extracted with acidified acetone (4 × 1 L) in an ultrasound bath for 1 h at room temperature. The combined orange-brown solution was evaporated in vacuo to dryness. The resulting crude extract (11.37 g) was dissolved in water and partitioned with ethyl acetate (5 × 300 mL). The resulting ethyl acetate fractions were combined and evaporated to dryness. Separation of the ethyl acetate extract (5.54 g) by gel-permeation column chromatography on Sephadex LH 20 (eluent acetone/methanol 4:1 (v/v) afforded six fractions (F1–F6). Only fractions showing a positive Bornträger reaction on TLC were further processed (Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Fig. S51).

Fraction F2 was separated by adsorption column chromatography on Polyamide SC 6-Ac using a series of solvents with increasing polarity (n-hexane, ethyl acetate, acetone, methanol) as eluents, yielding four fractions (F2a–F2d). Fraction F2b was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using toluene/ethyl acetate/chloroform (2:1:2 (v/v)) as elution system and afforded fraction F2b1 containing 2 (6.9 mg), and fractions F2b2–F2b3. Fraction F2b2 was further separated by gel-permeation column chromatography on Sephadex LH 20 (eluent methanol) and yielded compounds 4 in a pure form (2.1 mg), and 3 and 5 impure. Therefore, semi-preparative HPLC (0 → 20 min, 5 → 100% B for 3 and 5 individually) was carried out to afford 3 (tR = 16.2–16.5 min, 4.4 mg) and 5 (tR = 14.7–15.1 min, 1.4 mg). Likewise, fraction F2b3 was separated accordingly on Sephadex LH 20 (eluent methanol) and afforded compounds 6 (6.0 mg) and 7 (0.8 mg).

Fraction F4 was separated by gel-permeation column chromatography on Sephadex LH 60 (eluent methanol) resulting in four fractions (F4a–F4d). Fraction F4c was subjected to solid phase extraction on a C2-cartridge using mixtures of ethyl acetate and methanol (increasing polarity) as eluents to afford 8 (5.4 mg).

Fraction F5 was separated by gel-permeation column chromatography on Sephadex LH 20 (eluent methanol/dichloromethane 1:1 (v/v)) and yielded compounds 9 (3.6 mg) and 10 (3.2 mg).

Fraction F6 was separated by adsorption column chromatography on Polyamide SC 6 Ac, eluting with solvents with increasing polarity (n-hexane, ethyl acetate, acetone, methanol) resulting in four fractions (F6a–F6d). Fraction F6d was subjected to adsorption chromatography on C18 modified silica gel using water/methanol (isocratic, 7:3 (v/v)) as eluent to obtain 1 (18.3 mg).

4.7 Spectroscopic data of isolates

Clavorubin-8-O-methylether (1): yellow-orange amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.41 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 205 (3.85), 237 (3.91), 262 (3.85), 313 (3.54), 490 (3.45) nm; HRESIMS m/z 343.0462 ([M − H], calcd for C17H11O8, 343.0532; Scheme 1). 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HSQC and HMBC data see Table 1 and Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S2-S8. Purity: 1H NMR based: 87.7%.

(+)-7,7'-Emodinphyscion (2): dark yellow amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.64 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); [α]D24 + 2.53 (c 0.08, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 219 (3.86), 283 (3.52), 443 (3.21) nm; CD (c 0.04 mM, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 210 (−0.43), 224 (+ 2.39), 257 (+ 0.12), 270 (+ 1.07), 288 (− 1.98), 301 (+ 1.16) M−1 × cm−1; HRESIMS m/z 551.0995 ([M − H], calcd for C31H19O10, 551.1056). 1H NMR and 13C NMR data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S9-S12. Purity: 1H NMR based: 86.4%.

Emodin (3): orange amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.74 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.01), 221 (4.05), 254 (3.82), 289 (3.77), 437 (3.52) nm; HRESIMS m/z 269.0458 ([M − H], calcd for C15H9O5, 269.0528). 1H NMR and 13C NMR data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S13-S16. Purity: 1H NMR based: 88.7%.

Emodin-6,8-di-O-methylether (4): yellow amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.74 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 224 (4.10), 279 (3,82), 422 (3.44) nm; HRESIMS m/z 297.1535 ([M − H], calcd for C17H13O5, 297.0841). 1H NMR and 13C NMR (HSQC/HMBC) data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S17-S20. Purity: 1H NMR based: 91.2%.

Questin (5): yellow amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.60 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 217 (3.18), 285 (2.83), 438 (2.35) nm; HRESIMS m/z 283.0613 ([M − H], calcd for C16H11O5, 283.0685). 1H NMR and 13C NMR (HSQC/HMBC) data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S21-S24. Purity: 1H NMR based: 87.9%.

(+)-(S)-Skyrin (6): orange amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.54 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); [α]D24 + 52.5 (c 0.022 mg/mL, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 219 (3.30), 257 (3.11), 297 (2.92), 450 (2.74) nm; CD (c 0.04 mM, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 215 (-0,33), 246 (-0,20), 261 (+ 0,91), 308 (-0,21) M−1 × cm−1; HRESIMS m/z 537.0826 ([M − H], calcd for C30H17O10, 537.0900). 1H NMR and 13C NMR data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S25-S28. Purity: 1H NMR based: 92.6%.

(+)-(S)-Aurantioskyrin (7): orange amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.54 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); [α]D24 + 3.5 (c 0.08 mg/mL, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 255 (2.84), 301 (2.61), 468 (2.35) nm; CD (c 1.4 mM, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 222 (-0,06), 260 (+ 0,16), 304 (-0.04), 346 (+ 0.01) M−1 × cm−1; HRESIMS m/z 553.0774 ([M-H], calcd for C30H17O10, 554.0849). 1H NMR and 13C NMR (HSQC/HMBC) data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S29-S33. Purity: 1H NMR based: 66.3%.

Hypericin (8): black amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.52 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 216 (4.39), 285 (4.15), 327 (4.02), 383 (3.62), 450 (3.67), 471 (3.71), 509 (3.52), 546 (3.90), 588 (4.20) nm; HRESIMS m/z 503.0768 ([M − H], calcd for C30H15O8, 503.0845). 1H NMR and 13C NMR (HSQC/HMBC) data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S34-S37. Purity: 1H NMR based: 94.6%.

Dermolutein (9): yellow-orange amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.41 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 227 (4.03), 275 (3.85), 426 (3.42) nm; HRESIMS m/z 327.0509 ([M − H], calcd for C17H11O7, 327.0583). 1H NMR and 13C NMR data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S38-S40. Purity: 1H NMR based: 81.9%.

Endocrocin (10): yellow-orange amorphous solid; TLC Rf 0.48 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 227 (3.81), 257 (3.57), 274 (3.63), 442 (3.27) nm; HRESIMS m/z 313.0358 ([M − H], calcd for C16H9O7, 313.0427). 1H NMR and 13C NMR (HSQC/HMBC) data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S41-S44. Purity: 1H NMR based: 83.6%.

Clavorubin (11): The orange-red monomethylether clavorubin-8-O-methylether 1 (9.2 mg, 3.0 μmol) was heated with pyridinium chloride (1.71 g, 14.7 mmol) at 180 ℃ for 6 h in a 10 mL round-bottom flask. The red mass was cooled and digested with ultrapure water (10 mL). After centrifugation of the reaction mixture, the precipitate was separated and dissolved in 5% aqueous sodium carbonate solution. The resulting dark purple solution was acidified with conc. HCl until the reaction solution changes color to orange and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The organic layers were combined and separated by gel-permeation column chromatography on Sephadex LH 20 (eluent acetone/methanol 4:1 (v/v)) and yielded clavorubin (11) [5.8 mg (63%); Rf 0.58 (toluene/ethyl formate/formic acid, 10:5:3 (v/v)); HRESIMS m/z 329.0291 ([M-H], calcd for C16H9O8, 329.0376)], 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HSQC and HMBC data see Supplementary Information: Additional file 1, Figs. S46-S49. Purity: 1H NMR based: 91.8%.

4.8 Computational details

The molecular geometries of the compounds (+)-7,7'-emodinphyscion (2) and (+)-(S)-aurantioskyrin (7) were sampled using an in-house script. Starting from a SMILES string, the script generated 50 different structural conformers for both structures. These conformers were minimized with the steepest decent algorithm using the MMFF94 force field and ranked based on their total energies [66]. For 2 the best two force field energy minimum structures were saved as SDF file. These structures were further optimized using density functional theory (DFT) with the CAM-B3LYP [67] functional and the def2-TZVP [68] basis set. For 7 the best force field energy minimum structure was saved as SDF file and the stereoisomeric version of it was manually generated. Solvent effects for methanol were considered using the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM) [69] as implemented in the ORCA 5.0 [70] program package. Electronic Circular Dichroism (ECD) spectra were computed for each optimized structure using time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) at the same level of theory (CAM-B3LYP/def2-TZVP) by calculating the first 40 excited states. The calculated ECD spectra were compared with experimental data using the SpecDis software (version 1.71) [71] with a Gaussian distribution function at a half-bandwidth of σ = 0.3 eV, allowing for a spectral shift in the range of + 50 to − 50 nm.

4.9 Photodynamic inhibition (PDI) of microbial growth

All experiments and preparations for PDI were conducted under aseptic conditions within a biosafety level-2 laminar airflow cabinet at room temperature. The study examined the antibacterial and antifungal efficacy of selected compounds against Candida albicans (IBF19991201) and Staphylococcus aureus (DSM1104), sourced from the Leibniz Institute—DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany. Strains were stored in darkness at 4 ℃ until use. Bacteria were cultured on lysogeny broth (LB) agar, while C. albicans was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA). DMSO, LB-agar from Sigma Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Batch #018K0809), and RPMI-1640 medium (Lot: 1003383838) were purchased from Merck (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany); PDA and Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) from VWR (MHB Lot: 1934, PDA Lot: 241,310,184, VWR International GmbH, Vienna, Austria). Each PDI experiment involved a freshly prepared overnight culture incubated at 37 ℃ for 18–23 h in darkness. Each PDI experiment involved a freshly prepared overnight culture incubated at 37 ℃ for 18–23 h in darkness.

4.10 Photo minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay

Photoantimicrobial experiments followed established protocols [41]. Eleven compounds were tested, with chloramphenicol and fluconazole as positive controls. Identical 96-well plates were prepared for dark and light treatments, containing six dilution levels (0.06–5.00 µM), medium blanks, fraction blanks, and untreated growth controls. Inoculum turbidity was adjusted to a McFarland standard of 0.5 (1.5 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) using spectrophotometry at 600 nm (bacteria) [72] and 530 nm (yeast) [73]. Bacterial cultures were prepared in Müller Hinton Broth (MHB), while yeast was cultivated in double-strength RPMI-1640 media. Within 30 min of inoculum preparation, plates were inoculated (50 μL for bacteria, 100 μL for yeast) to achieve standard CFU concentrations ((2–8) × 105 CFU/mL for bacteria and (0.5–2.5) × 105 CFU/mL for yeast) [73, 74]. After 30 min of incubation in darkness, one plate was exposed to a light dose of 30 J/cm2 (λ = 459.6 nm, E = 33.7 mW/cm2, t = 14.8 min) using a LabLights Millu 1–96 Microplate Illuminator (prototype of LabLights, Innsbruck, Austria). Both light-treated and control plates were incubated at 37 ℃ for 24 h in darkness. Following incubation, plates were homogenized using a microplate mixer and absorbance was measured (bacteria: 600 nm, fungi: 530 nm) with a SpectraMax® PLUS 384 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices LLC., San Jose, CA, USA). The inhibitory effects were determined by comparing treated wells to uninhibited controls, with blank corrections applied. All conditions were tested in technical and biological triplicates, and data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA).

4.11 (Photo)cytotoxicity evaluation

Cytotoxicity assessments were performed on A549 (non-small cell lung cancer, ATCC, Sigma-Aldrich) and T24 (urinary bladder carcinoma, CLS, Eppelheim) cell lines. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco, 11,520,556) supplemented with 8.93% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Eximus, BS-2020–500), 0.893 mM sodium pyruvate (Pyr, Gibco, 11,360,070), and 89.3 U/mL penicillin–streptomycin (P/S, Biotech, P06-07100), with routine passaging at 80% confluency. The assay followed established protocols, with cells seeded into 96-well plates at 2000 cells/well and incubated at 37 ℃ with 5% CO2 for 24 h [44, 75]. Test compounds (11 in total) were dissolved in DMSO (10 mM stock) and diluted to the test concentrations (0.5–50 μM). After a 24 h treatment period, media were aspirated, replaced, and one of two identical plates was irradiated with 5.5 J/cm2 (λ = 468 nm, E = 6.2 mW/cm2, t = 14.8 min), while the other was kept in darkness. Plates were further incubated for 48 h towards achieving a 96 h total incubation for the whole assay. Cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid and stained with 0.057% sulforhodamine B (Acid red 52, TCI, 3520-42-1) [43]. After washing and drying, 200 µL of 10 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS, Carl Roth, 77-86-1) were placed in each well to redissolve the staining agent. After 30 min of incubation and 1 min of double orbital shaking, light absorbance at 510 ± 0.8 nm was read out using a Tecan Spark® 10 M plate-reader (Tecan Trading AG, Männedorf, Switzerland). EC₅₀ values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA) with a 95% confidence interval.

4.12 Statistical analysis and visualization programs

Statistical analyses were performed in R Version 4.3.3 [76]. For comparing of Q-values and spore sizes, a Bonferroni t-test was applied [77]. For the scatterplot of the spore sizes, the package ggplot2 [78] was used. For creating the figures Inkscape 1.3 was used [79].

Notes

Acknowledgements

Regina Kuhnert is warmly thanked for her support in the mycological collection at the IBF, and Ulrich Sturm for his initial assistance with the photocytotoxicity assay. The Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry at the University of Innsbruck is gratefully acknowledged for generously providing access to their infrastructure. Simone Moser is warmly thanked for the fruitful discussions.

Author contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Our research was funded through the Weave Lead Agency Procedure by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)–Projekt Nummer 491871566 and by the Österreichischer Wissenschaftsfond (FWF, Austrian Science Fund)–Projekt Nummer I 5867-B.

Data availability

The raw spectroscopic data for compounds 111 are deposited at RADAR [80]. Nomenclatural and taxonomic data of new taxa are deposited in MycoBank under the number MB858613. Newly generated sequences are deposited at GenBank, under the accession numbers PQ859656 (ITS), PX230468 (LSU), PX240688 (rpb1).

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

  1. 1.
    Moser M, Horak E. Cortinarius Fr. und nahe verwandte Gattungen in Südamerika. Beih Nova Hedwigia. 1975;52: 1-628. PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garnica S, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies in South American Cortinarius species. Mycol Res. 2003;107: 1143-56. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soop K, Dima B, Cooper JA, Park D, Buchanan B. A phylogenetic approach to a global supraspecifc taxonomy of Cortinarius (Agaricales) with an emphasis on the southern mycota. Persoonia. 2019;42: 261-90. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soop K, Cooper JA, Nilsen AR, Orlovich DA. Cortinarius subgenus Leprocybe (Agaricales) in New Zealand. N Z J Bot. 2023;61: 282-303. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salomón MES, Barroetaveña C, Niskanen T, Liimatainen K, Smith ME, Peintner U. Loose ends in the Cortinarius phylogeny: fve new myxotelamonoid species indicate a high diversity of these ectomycorrhizal fungi with South American Nothofagaceae. Life. 2021;11: 420. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nouhra E, Kuhar F, Truong C, Pastor N, Crespo E, Mujic A, et al. Thaxterogaster revisited: a phylogenetic and taxonomic overview of sequestrate Cortinarius from Patagonia. Mycologia. 2021;113: 1022-55. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gómez-Espinoza J, Riquelme C, Romero-Villegas E, Ahumada-Rudolph R, Novoa V, Méndez P, et al. Diversity of Agaricomycetes in southern South America and their bioactive natural products. Nat Prod Res. 2023;38: 3389-403. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam YTH, Schmitz LM, Huymann L, Dhar D, Morgan I, Rennert R, et al. Cortinarius steglichii: a taxonomical and chemical novelty from Chile. Mycol Prog. 2024;23: 55. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fries E. Systema mycologicum: sistens fungorum ordines, genera et species, huc usque cognitas, quas ad normam methodi naturalis determinavit. Systema mycologicum, sistens fungorum ordines, genera et species. Gryphiswaldae: Mauritius; 1821. PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fries E. Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici. Upsaliae: e typografia Academia; 1877. PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wünsche O. Die Pilze. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner; 1877. PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orton PD. Cortinarius Ⅱ (Inoloma, Dermocybe). London: Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union; 1958. PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moser M. Die Gattung Dermocybe (Fr.) Wünsche (Die Hautköpfe). Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde. 1974;52: 97-108. PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singer R. The agaricales in modern taxonomy. Weinheim: J. Cramer; 1962. PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Høiland K. Contribution to the nomenclature of Cortinarius subgenus Dermocybe. Nord J Bot. 1985;5: 625-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moser M, Peintner U. Die phylogenetischen Beziehungen der Cortinarius aureopluverulentus Gruppe. Micol Veget Medit. 2002;17: 3-17. PubMed Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peintner U, Horak E, Moser M, Vilgalys R. Phylogeny of Rozites, Cuphocybe and Rapacea inferred from ITS and LSU rDNA sequences. Mycologia. 2002;94: 620-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peintner U, Moser MM, Thomas KA, Manimohan P. First records of ectomycorrhizal Cortinarius species (Agaricales, Basidiomycetes) from tropical India and their phylogenetic position based on rDNA ITS sequences. Mycol Res. 2003;107(Pt 4): 485-94. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garnica S, Weiß M, Oertel B, Oberwinkler F. A framework for a phylogenetic classifcation in the genus Cortinarius (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) derived from morphological and molecular data. Can J Bot. 2005;83: 1457-77. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garnica S, Weiß M, Oertel B, Ammirati J, Oberwinkler F. Phylogenetic relationships in Cortinarius, section Calochroi, inferred from nuclear DNA sequences. BMC Evol Biol. 2009. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niskanen T, Liimatainen K, Ammirati JF, Hughes K. Cortinarius section sanguinei in North America. Mycologia. 2013;105: 344-56. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    San-Fabian B, Niskanen T, Liimatainen K, Kooij PW, Mujic AB, Truong C, et al. New species of Cortinarius sect. Austroamericani, sect nov, from South American Nothofagaceae forests. Mycologia. 2018;110: 1127-44. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soop K, Dima B, Cooper JA, Park D, Oertel B. A phylogenetic approach to a global supraspecific taxonomy of Cortinarius (Agaricales) with an emphasis on the southern mycota. Persoonia. 2019;42: 261-90. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liimatainen K, Kim JT, Pokorny L, Kirk PM. Taming the beast: a revised classification of Cortinariaceae based on genomic data. Fungal Divers. 2022;112: 89-170. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huymann LR, Hannecker A, Giovanni T, Liimatainen K, Niskanen T, Probst M, et al. Revised taxon definition in European Cortinarius subgenus Dermocybe based on phylogeny, chemotaxonomy, and morphology. Mycol Progress. 2024;23: 26. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gruber I. 1975. Papierchromatographische Pigmentanalyse von südamerikanischen Dermocyben und Cortinarien. In: Moser M, Horak E. Cortinarius Fr. und naheverwandte Gattungen in Südamerika. Beih Nova Hewigia. 52:524–540 PubMed Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keller G, Moser M, Horak E, Steglich W. Chemotaxonomic investigation of species ofDermocybe (Fr.) Wünsche (Agaricales) from New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Argentina. Sydowia. 1987;40: 168-87. PubMed Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laub A, Sendatzki A-K, Palfner G, Wessjohann LA, Schmidt J, Arnold N. HPTLC-DESI-HRMS based profiling of anthraquinones in complex mixtures-a proof-of-concept study using crude extracts of Chilean mushrooms. Foods. 2020;9: 156. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Greff A, Porzel A, Schmidt J, Palfner G, Arnold N. Pigment pattern of the Chilean mushroom Dermocybe nahuelbutensis Garrido & E Horak. Rec Nat Prod. 2017;11: 547-51. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Soop K. Notes et observations sur les champignons cortinarioïdes de Nouvelle-Zélande. Docum Mycol. 1998;112: 13-25. PubMed Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arnold N. Morphologisch-anatomische Untersuchungen an der Untergattung Telamonia (Cortinarius, Agaricales). Eching: IHW-Verlag; 1993. PubMed Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schmidt J. Negative ion electrospray high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry of polyphenols. J Mass Spectrom. 2016;51:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.3712. ([30}). PubMed Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gill M, Buchanan MS, Steel PJ, Milanovic NM, Phonh-Axa S. Pigments of fungi. XLVIII. Clavorubin from two Australasian toadstools of the genus Cortinarius and the X-ray crystal structure of the methyl ester of 6-O-methylclavorubin. Aust J Chem. 1998;51: 347-52. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ge R, Guo X, Jia H, Zhang J, Fan A, Liu D, et al. Nucleobase-coupled canthones with anti-ROS effects from marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sydowii. J Org Chem. 2024;89: 7692-704. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang X-N, Tan RX, Wang F, Steglich W, Ji-Kai L. The first isolation of a phlegmacin type pigment from the ascomycete Xylaria euglossa. Z Naturforsch. 2004;60B: 333-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fujimoto H, Fujimaki T, Okuyama E, Yamazaki M. Immunomodulatory constituents from an ascomycete, Microascus tardifaciens. Chem Pharm Bull. 1999;47: 1426-32. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Koyama K, Aida S, Natori S. Supplemental observations on atropisomerism of fungal bis(naphtho-γ-pyrone)s. Chem Pharm Bull. 1990;38: 2259-61. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gill M, Steglich W. Pigments of fungi (Macromycetes) progress in the chemistry of organic natural products 51. Vienna: Springer; 1987. PubMed Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Falk H, Schmitzberger W. On the nature of “soluble” hypericin in Hypericum species. Monatsh Chem. 1992;123: 731-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gill M, Morgan PM, White JM, Yu J. Pigments of fungi. XLVII. Cardinalic acid, a new anthraquinone carboxylic acid from the New Zealand toadstool Dermocybe cardinalis and the synthesis and X-ray crystal structure of methyl 1,7,8-tri-O-methylcardinalate. Aust J Chem. 1998;51: 213-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fiala J, Schöbel H, Vrabl P, Dietrich D, Hammerle F, Artmann DJ, et al. A new high-throughput-screening-assay for photoantimicrobials based on EUCAST revealed unknown photoantimicrobials in Cortinariaceae. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 703544. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hammerle F, Fiala J, Höck A, Huymann L, Vrabl P, Husiev Y, et al. Fungal anthraquinone photoantimicrobials challenge the dogma of cationic photosensitizers. J Nat Prod. 2023;86: 2247-57. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vichai V, Kirtikara K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat Protoc. 2006;2006(1): 1112-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hopkins SL, Siewert B, Askes SHC, Veldhuizen P, Zwier R, Heger M, et al. An in vitro cell irradiation protocol for testing photopharmaceuticals and the effect of blue, green, and red light on human cancer cell lines. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2016;15: 644-53. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Franck B, Zimmer I. Mutterkorn-Farbstoffe, Ⅷ: Konstitution und Synthese des Clavorubins. Chem Ber. 1965;98: 1514-21. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Franck B, Reschke T. Clavoxanthin und Clavorubin, zwei neue Mutterkorn-Farbstoffe. Angew Chem. 1959. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gill M. Pigments of fungi (Macromycetes). Nat Prod Rep. 2003;20: 615-39. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Keller G, Ammirati JF. Chemotaxonomic significance of anthraquinone derivatives in North American species of Dermocybe, section Sanguineae. Mycotaxon. 1983;18: 357-77. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Keller G, Ammirati JF. Chemotaxonomic studies on the pigmentation of North American species of Dermocybe (Fr) Wünsche, section Dermocybe and related species. Beih Sydowia. 1995;10: 127-36. PubMed Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Antonowitz A, Gill M, Morgan PM, Jin Y. Coupled anthraquinones from the toadstool Dermocybe icterinoides. Phytochemistry. 1994;37: 1679-83. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gill M. Pigments of fungi (macromycetes). Nat Prod Rep. 1994;11: 67-90. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gill M, Giménez A. Austrovenetin, the principal pigment of the toadstool Dermocybe austroveneta. Phytochemistry. 1991;30: 951-5. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gill M. New pigments of Cortinarius Fr. and Dermocybe (Fr.) Wünsche (Agaricales) from Australia and New Zealand. Beih Sydowia. 1995;10: 73-87. PubMed Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hammerle F, Steger LM, Zhou X, Bonnet S, Huymann L, Peintner U, et al. Optimized isolation of 7,7′-biphyscion starting from Cortinarius rubrophyllus, a chemically unexplored fungal species rich in photosensitizers. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2022;21: 221-34. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gill M, Smrdel AF. Pigments of fungi. LXV. Tetrahydroanthraquinone and anthraquinone gentiobiosides from the fungus Dermocybe splendida. Aust J Chem. 2000;53: 47-58. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cailleux AD. Code des Coleurs des Sols. Boubée; 1986 PubMed Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Munsell AH. (2000) Munsell soil color charts. Gretag Macbeth: Munsell Color, New Windsor, N.Y, USA. https://soils.uga.edu/files/2016/08/Munsell.pdf, Accessed 24 Jan 2024 PubMed Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peintner U, Bougher NL, Castellano MA, Moncalvo JM, Moser MM, Trappe JM, et al. Multiple origins of sequestrate fungi related to Cortinarius (Cortinariaceae). Am J Bot. 2001;88: 2168-79. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zolan ME, Pukkila PJ. Inheritance of DNA methylation in Coprinus cinereus. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6: 195-200. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfland DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCRT Protocols. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. PubMed Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stefani FO, Jones RH, May TW. Concordance of seven gene genealogies compared to phenotypic data reveals multiple cryptic species in Australian dermocyboid Cortinarius (Agaricales). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;71: 249-60. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28: 1647-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30: 772-80. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 1312-3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist FR. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics. 2001;17: 754-5. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Halgren TA. MMFFVI. MMFF94s option for energy minimization studies. J Comput Chem. 1999;20: 720-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yanai T, Tew DP. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem Phys Lett. 2004;393: 51-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Weigend F, Ahlrichs R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2005;7: 3297-305. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Barone V, Cossi MJ. Quantum calculation of molecular energies and energy gradients in solution by a conductor solvent model. Phys Chem A. 1998;102: 1995-2001. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Neese F. Software update: the ORCA program system, version 4.0. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2018;8: e1327. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bruhn T, Schaumlöffel A, Hemberger Y, Pescitelli G SpecDis version 1.71, Berlin, Germany. 2017. https://specdis-software.jimdo.com. Accessed 24 Jan 2024 PubMed Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock R. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc. 2008;3: 163-75. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Arendrup MC, Barchiesi F, Bille J, Chryssanthou E, Cuenca-Estrella M, et al. EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.1: method for the determination of broth dilution MICs of antifungal agents for fermentative yeasts. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14: 398-405. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    CLSI Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility. Tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; Approved Standard-Ninth Edition. CLSI document M07-A9. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. PubMed Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Freshney RI. Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique and specialized applications. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010. PubMed Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009. PubMed Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Revelle W. How to use the psych package for regression and mediation analysis. 2022. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psychTools/vignettes/mediation.pdf. PubMed Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wickham H. Getting Started with ggplot2. In: ggplot2. Use R!, Cham: Springer. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_2 PubMed Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Inkscape Project. Inkscape 2020. https://inkscape.org. PubMed Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lange J. Dataset: dataset for “Cortinarius mapuveronicae from South America, a chemical and morphological link between European and Australian dermocyboid Cortinarii”. RADAR (Research Data Repository) v1.19.1, FIZ Karlsruhe, Germany. https://doi.org/10.22000/m255c36k0wm8ndhr PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2026

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josefine Lange
    • 1
  • Lesley Huymann
    • 2
  • Sophie Schwarzkopf
    • 3
  • Dilara Balci
    • 1
  • Mehdi D. Davari
    • 1
  • Arijana Turanovic
    • 3
  • Clemens Gotsis
    • 2
  • Götz Palfner
    • 4
  • Bianka Siewert
    • 3,5
  • Ursula Peintner
    • 2
  • Norbert Arnold
    • 1
  •     
  1. 1. Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
  2. 2. Department of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  3. 3. Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  4. 4. Departamento de Botanica, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanograficas, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla, 160-C Concepción, Chile
  5. 5. Present Address: Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 45, 20146 Hamburg, Germany