Harnessing Actinobacteria secondary metabolites for tuberculosis drug discovery: Historical trends, current status and future outlooks

  • Luana Layse Câmara de Almeida 1 ,  
  • Sayoane Pessoa Fernandes 1 ,  
  • Genil Dantas de Oliveira 2,3 ,  
  • Marcelly da Silveira Silva 1 ,  
  • Thalisson Amorim de Souza 2 ,  
  • Valnês S. Rodrigues-Junior 3 ,  
  • Samuel Paulo Cibulski 1,4
  •     

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading infectious disease killer and one of the major causes of deaths worldwide. Although TB is a curable and preventable disease, in 2023, approximately 10.8 million people fell ill with TB and there were an estimated 1.25 million of deaths worldwide. Despite some research progress for new drug candidates, drug repurposing, and new regimens, there is still an urgent need for the new medicins to treat TB, especially due to the growing cases of multidrug and extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) strains. Drug resistance is a challenging obstacle to TB care and prevention globally, making TB harder and longer to treat, often with poorer outcomes for patients. The Actinomycetota encompass Gram-positive bacteria that produce a milieu of bioactive metabolites, including antibiotics, antiproliferative drugs, immunosuppressive agents, and other important medical molecules. Actinomycetota have a special place in the therapeutic arsenal to fight TB, as rifamycins, aminoglycosides, and cycloserine are derived from Streptomyces species, one of the most important genera in this phylum. Furthermore, hundreds of antimycobacterial metabolites have been isolated from Actinomycetota and can serve as effective drugs or useful agents for the discovery of new lead compounds to combat TB. The present review covers more than 171 isolated substances as potential antimycobacterial agents discovered between the years 1972 to 2024. Among the most potent compounds, with MIC in the submicromolar range, steffimycins, ilamycins/rufomycins, nosiheptide, actinomycins, lassomycin and boromycin are the most promising compounds. These compounds represent highly promising candidates for development of new antitubercular drugs. Additionally, some of these substances also demonstrated activity against resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains, which is particularly relevant given the difficulty of treating MDR and XDR strains. Thus, actinobacteria have played and continue to play an important role in fight TB, remaining a promising source of antibiotic metabolites. Their unique metabolic diversity enables the production of metabolites with innovative mechanisms of action, making them a strategic reservoir for discovering therapies against untreatable forms of the disease.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Antimycobacterial activity    Natural products    Actinomycete    Secondary metabolites    Antibiotics    

1 Introduction

Since ancient times, products of natural origin have been fundamental for the discovery and development of medicines for the treatment of various diseases, mainly those caused by microorganisms, especially bacterial infections [1]. Notably, until the beginning of the twentieth century, approximately 80% of available medicines originated from plants [2]. It was only in 1928 that the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming, from the fungus Penicillium notatum, marked a significant turning point in the history of natural products [3].

Natural products from microorganisms exhibit a wide range of biological properties, including antimicrobial, antitumoral, and immunosuppressive activities, as well as applications as veterinary drugs, pesticides, flavorings, and nutraceuticals [4]. Among these microorganisms, actinobacteria stand out, which are characterized by their high biosynthetic capacity to produce molecules of great clinical relevance [5].

Actinobacteria emerged approximately 2700 million years ago. They were initially obligate anaerobes, non-filamentous and non-spore-forming, in addition to presenting simple morphological characteristics [6]. Nowadays they are ubiquitous in Earth's major environmental compartments and their vast population sizes and rapid cellular production rates contribute to an extraordinary genetic diversity [7]. Most members of this phylum have a complex lifestyle, forming aerial and substrate mycelium, [8, 9].

Currently, they are one of the most diverse groups of microorganisms found in nature, characterized by a peptidoglycan-rich cell wall, Gram-positive, with high content of guanine and cytosine in their genome and are widely distributed in different habitats, including the microbiomes of higher eukaryotic organisms [1012]. When resources are scarce, these microorganisms produce aerial hyphae that segment themselves, giving rise to spores that are capable of withstanding adverse conditions and easily dispersing to new environments or nutrient sources [13].

The phylum represents one of the largest phyla in the Bacteria domain, with the Streptomyces genus being the largest [14]. The genus Streptomyces has more than 800 species with validated nomenclature, being responsible for approximately 39% of all described microbial metabolites, including about 80% of known bioactive molecules [15, 16]. The production of these bioactive compounds is directly related to the nutritional and environmental conditions of the habitat. These compounds are often classified as stress metabolites, since they are produced as an adaptive response to adverse environmental conditions, aiding in survival and competition with other microorganisms [17].

The remarkable genetic potential of these microorganisms for the production of a wide variety of secondary metabolites is evidenced by the presence of numerous biosynthetic gene clusters (BGC) in their genomes. Investigation of the metabolic potential of the genus Streptomyces revealed a vast set of modular biosynthetic genes, responsible for the production of several complex secondary metabolites [1820]. They usually produce antibiotics using large enzyme complexes, such as polyketide synthases, non-ribosomal peptide synthases or a combination of both, in which these multienzyme complexes perform different chemical alterations, and thus there is a wide production and variety of antibiotics [13]. However, isolates belonging to the same species but originating from different environments may present distinct repertoires of these BGC related to the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds, reflecting great genomic flexibility and adaptation to specific ecological conditions [21].

Currently, in the genomic era, the integration of genomics, chemical dereplication, and the exploration of novel environments/habitats has become a pivotal strategy in the search for antimicrobial compounds from microorganisms, including Actinobacteria. Advances in genome mining and metagenomics enable the rapid identification of BGC encoding potential antimicrobial metabolites, while chemical dereplication techniques streamline the identification and elimination of known compounds, focusing efforts on discovering novel scaffolds [22]. By targeting underexplored ecological niches, such as extreme environments, marine sediments, and plant microbiomes, researchers can uncover unique microorganisms with untapped biosynthetic potential. This triad, that comprehends genome mining, chemical dereplication and underexplored ambient, not only accelerates antibiotic discovery but also enhances the efficiency of isolating structurally diverse and biologically active molecules to combat rising antimicrobial resistance.

The identification of streptomycin as the first successful antibiotic to treat TB from Actinobacteria stimulated intensive exploration of these filamentous microrganisms, leading to the discovery of a wide variety of bioactive compounds [23]. Despite the scientific advances achieved over the years, there has been a significant decrease in the discovery of new natural products, evidenced by the fact that approximately 50% of currently available antimicrobials were identified during the so-called “Golden Age” of antibiotics, between the 1950s and 1960s [4]. At the same time, even with continuous efforts to control and treat TB, the emergence of drug-resistant strains remains a relevant challenge for global health [24].

2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis and tuberculosis (TB)

Tuberculosis (TB) is a communicable disease that affects millions of people worldwide and returned to be the leading global cause of death caused by a single infectious agent, replacing COVID-19 [25]. This pathology stands out for mainly affecting the lungs, causing pulmonary TB. However, TB can affect other organs, resulting in extrapulmonary TB [26, 27]. The pulmonary form of the disease accounts for approximately 85% of cases reported globally and is considered a major contributor to antimicrobial resistance [28].

TB is transmitted through the dissemination of aerosols in the environment when an infected individual cough, speaks, or sneezes [27]. Once inhaled, Mtb travel through the respiratory system until they reach the lungs, where innate immune mechanisms are activated, allowing alveolar macrophages to engulf the infecting bacilli and attempt to destroy them through proteolytic enzymes and cytokines, which can lead to the elimination of the microorganism or the formation of granulomas [29]. Mtb can remain in granulomas in its latent and asymptomatic form for many years. However, this infection can be reactivated, resulting in the active form of the disease, characterized by being transmissible and contagious [30].

TB is believed to have existed for thousands of years, with the first written records of the disease dating back to 3300 and 2300 years ago [31]. The Hippocratic school considered TB, known at the time as phthisis, a disease of hereditary origin, not recognizing its contagious nature [32]. The possible contagious etiology of the disease was initially suggested by Isocrates and, later, by Aristotle, who, when describing cases of cervical lymphadenopathy compatible with scrofula in domesticated pigs and cattle, indicated transmission through inhalation of contaminated aerosols, referring to the process as a result of exposure to “polluted air”. Galen, later, also demonstrated adherence to the contagious theory, recommending avoiding close contact with individuals affected by the disease [33]. Over the years, despite advances in the understanding of various pathological and clinical aspects of TB, its etiopathogenesis remained unknown [34].

It was only in 1882 that the causative agent of TB was identified, thanks to Robert Koch who in a short time managed to isolate the microorganism and reproduce the disease in experimental animals [35, 36]. In the early twentieth century, Koch's collaborator Carl Flügge suggested that the tubercle bacillus was spread to new individuals through microscopic respiratory particles, showing that exposure to these droplets expelled by tuberculous patients could result in infection [33].

Mtb is a rod-shaped bacterium, immobile, grows slowly, and is generally aerobic, but is capable of surviving in hypoxic environments during latent infection. In addition, it has an important component in its cell wall, mycolic acid, which gives it the acid-fast characteristic [37]. It is characterized by being a bacterium with a versatile metabolism, being able to switch to alternative metabolic pathways when exposed to drugs or stress, which allows it to withstand long periods of dormancy [38], being able to persist in a latent state in most infected individuals without causing evident clinical manifestations [39]. In addition, it uses proteins similar to eukaryotic proteins to manipulate host signaling pathways, favoring its survival and intracellular replication [40].

Regarding TB prevention, BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin), first administered to humans in 1921, is one of the most widely used vaccines globally and remains an integral part of national immunization programs for TB prevention in many countries [41, 42]. This vaccine is composed of an attenuated strain of M. bovis and offers protection against Mtb. BCG is known to induce trained immunity, a mechanism triggered by exogenous or endogenous stimuli that results in an enhanced effector function of immune cells after a second exposure, ensuring a more efficient response [43].

BCG has a well-established safety profile, presenting immunomodulatory effects that make it particularly effective against central nervous system TB and disseminated TB when administered at birth or in school-aged children. It remains a standard vaccine that demonstrates efficacy comparable to the most recent subunit TB vaccines tested to date [44]. The vaccine is routinely administered shortly after birth in countries with a high TB burden, with the aim of preventing severe forms of the disease [45]. Since its introduction in Europe in the 1920s, the BCG vaccine has been associated with a significant reduction in infant mortality to a magnitude that exceeds the expected effect of specific prevention against TB. Of note, much of this reduction is observed during the first year of life, particularly among infants who received the immunization [44, 46]. New vaccines for TB are being developed aiming to be safer and more effective than the BCG vaccine. In 2024, there were fifteen new vaccine candidates under clinical investigation, six of which were in Phase Ⅲ trials [25].

3 Tuberculosis treatment: past, present and, future

Before the emergence of antibiotics for the treatment of TB and, even with the advances in the diagnosis of this pathology in the nineteenth century, therapies were still immature. The therapeutic regimen indicated for that time was based on Galenic principles, including staying in places with a temperate climate, isolation, good hygiene and nutrition [34]. Even before the twentieth century, numerous surgical techniques were developed for the control and treatment of TB, such as pneumothorax, lung collapse, cavity drainage, thoracoplasty and lung’s resection [47].

In 1943, Selman Waksman isolated the Streptomyces griseus, the microorganism responsible for the production of streptomycin. Thus, the first effective antibiotic in the treatment of TB emerged, resulting in a significant reduction in lesions caused by the disease, and a clear drop in mortality [48, 49]. Its use expanded rapidly, leading to the early emergence of resistance mechanisms [50].

Shortly after the introduction of streptomycin, new medications were added for TB treatment, notably ρ-aminosalicylic acid, thiosemicarbazone and isoniazid [51]. It was observed that the administration of these agents together with streptomycin resulted in an increased cure rates [52]. However, despite these advances, side effects, drug resistance and the high number of new cases stimulated the search for new pharmacological treatments [53].

In 1957, rifamycin, a potent antibiotic against Mtb was isolated from Streptomyces mediterranei [54]. By the late 1960s, its derivative rifampicin was introduced into clinical practice, becoming a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with TB, particularly those who had developed resistance to previously available therapies [55, 56]. In subsequent years, additional antimycobacterial agents with complementary mechanisms of action were identified, including kanamycin [57], capreomycin [58], and cycloserine [59]. These drugs have played, and continue to play, a critical role in in the treatment of TB, especially in multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) [60]. Figure 1 outlines the introduction and evolution of antitubercular drugs used in clinical practice.

Fig. 1

Milestones in the discovery and use of drugs against Mtb. The golden age of anti-tubercular drug discovery (1940–1960) saw transformative breakthroughs, revolutionizing TB treatment and reducing mortality. The subsequent 40-year drought (1970–2000) stalled progress due to waning industry investment, reliance on existing drugs, and the rise MDR-TB lineages

Currently, rifampicin is one of the main drugs in the first-line treatment regimen for drug-sensitive TB. This treatment consists primarily of the combination of 4 drugs, rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol and pyrazinamide for a period of 2 months, followed by isoniazid and rifampicin for an additional period of 4 months [27, 61]. In 2023, treatment success for drug-susceptible tuberculosis remained high, with an effectiveness rate of 88% [25]. On the other hand, with 10.8 million new cases worldwide, TB incidence has only decreased by 8.3% from 2015 to 2023, falling far short of the End TB Strategy's 50% reduction target for 2025 [25].

4 Drug-resistant TB: definitions, global burden, and therapeutic advances

According to the WHO, drug-resistant TB is classified into five categories: isoniazid-resistant TB, rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB), MDR-TB (resistant to rifampicin and isoniazid), pre-XDR-TB (resistant to rifampicin and any fluoroquinolone), and XDR-TB (resistant to rifampicin, plus any fluoroquinolone, plus at least one of either bedaquiline or linezolid) [25, 62]. These distinct resistance profiles underscore the urgent need for tailored treatments and intensified efforts in surveillance, diagnosis, and drug development.

Drug-resistant TB continues to be a public health threat and is among the 24 pathogens that have been incorporated into the WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List [25]. Drug resistance is a major challenge in several regions of the world, with estimates indicating that drug-resistant TB could generate a global economic burden of approximately US$ 16.7 trillion between 2015 and 2050, accounting for 20% and 25% of the projected total cost of antimicrobial resistance during that period [62]. In 2023, worldwide healthcare systems identified and provided treatment for 175,923 individuals with MDR-TB. However, this represents just 44% of the estimated 400,000 people who developed these drug-resistant forms of TB that year [25]. This substantial diagnostic and treatment gap reflect ongoing challenges in access to healthcare services, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

In addition to genetic mutations and intrinsic mechanisms (not discussed in this review), several other factors have been implicated in the development of resistance to TB treatment. These include interindividual differences in drug metabolism, activation of efflux pumps, poor drug penetration into TB-infected tissues, low-quality pharmaceutical formulations, suboptimal dosing, limited access to healthcare services, insufficiently trained healthcare personnel, as well as socioeconomic determinants such as poverty and overcrowding. Collectively, these elements contribute to treatment failure and the selection of resistant strains. These insights underscore the need for comprehensive strategies encompassing the development of novel therapeutic agents, optimized drug delivery systems, and broader public health interventions [62, 63]. Notably, TB treatment becomes more challenging with the emergence of resistant variants, as patients with resistance to first-line treatments often require prolonged regimens involving second-line drugs, which are generally less effective, more toxic, and more expensive [64, 65].

WHO has established all-oral treatment protocols for MDR/RR-TB, representing a significant improvement over previous injectable-based regimen. Currently, WHO recommends three distinct categories of treatment for drug-resistant TB. The first category features two all-oral 6-month treatment protocols for individuals with MDR/RR-TB, applicable regardless of fluoroquinolone resistance status. The second category encompasses various 9-month all-oral protocols specifically designed for MDR/RR-TB patients without fluoroquinolone resistance. The third category consists of extended 18–20-month regimens that may incorporate an injectable medication (amikacin). The 6-month protocols are considered preferable, while the longest regimens are reserved as a final option. Importantly, recent years have shown substantial improvement in treatment outcomes for MDR/RR-TB patients. For those beginning treatment in 2021 (the most recent year with complete outcome data), the success rate reached 68%, though this remains considerably lower than rates achieved with drug-sensitive TB [25]. The spread of these resistant strains has become a major concern for public health, making it urgent to discover new drugs with different mechanisms of action that reduce the duration of TB treatment and are not impacted by pre-existing resistance [66, 67].

Advancing TB research and innovation is critical, with a focus on developing less complex and quicker treatment regimens. The WHO has established a comprehensive global strategy to enhance and expedite TB research efforts while ensuring fair access to research benefits. Promising developments are emerging in new diagnostic tools, medications, and vaccines for tuberculosis [25]. As of August 2024, the pipeline for TB treatment medications had expanded to 29 drugs undergoing clinical trials (Phase Ⅰ, Ⅱ, or Ⅲ), representing significant growth from just eight candidates in 2015. The portfolio includes 18 novel chemical entities: alphibectir (BVL-GSK098), BTZ-043, delpazolid, GSK-286, ganfeborole (GSK-3036656), macozinone, MK-7762 (TBD09), quabodepistat (OPC-167832), TBAJ-587, TBAJ-876, TBI-223, pyrifazimine (TBI-166), TBA-7371, telacebec (Q203), sanfetrinem, SQ109, sutezolid, and sudapyridine (WX-081). Additionally, the pipeline features three WHO-approved treatments (bedaquiline, delamanid, and pretomanid) alongside eight repurposed medications: clofazimine, levofloxacin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, high-dose rifampicin, rifapentine, sitafloxacin, and tedizolid. Beyond individual drugs, researchers are also evaluating various combination regimens incorporating both new and repurposed compounds, as well as host-directed therapies, through Phase Ⅱ, Phase Ⅲ/Ⅳ trials, and operational research initiatives [25].

5 Actinomycetota: nature's molecular architects–an unparalleled reservoir of antimycobacterial metabolites

5.1 Mapping the scientific output on actinobacteria and TB drug discovery

As already mentioned, the compounds produced by Actinobacteria have a long history of use in the treatment of TB. From this great asset, many molecules with antimycobacterial activity were discovered. However, the activity of the vast majority of these molecules was not explored clinically, or even in animal tests. In this context, the present work provides an overview of natural substances with antimycobacterial activity derived from Actinobacteria. This review, that compiles 171 molecules with antimycobacterial activity, was performed thorough in the PubMed database using the terms: “Actinobacteria", "Actinomycete", "Streptomyces" and "Mycobacterium tuberculosis”. Three hundred eighty-four articles were retrieved, after removing duplicates and articles that not present elucidated chemical structures, 60 articles published between 1972 to 2024 were elected to deep analyses. Figure 2 depicts a bibliometric data extracted from the selected articles.

Fig. 2

Bibliometic data and Actinobacteria-producing antimycobacterial metabolites source. A Number of studies conducted on the isolation of antimycobacterial metabolites by country. B VOSviewer network visualization of the selected studies. C Distribution of actinobacteria-derived metabolites with antimycobacterial properties based on bacterial habitat (isolation source)

Of the sixty articles retrieved, the most were from Asia (68.3%), with China, Japan and Thailand having the largest contributions (29 publications, 48.3%) (Fig. 2A). Figure 2B displays the geographical distribution of the selected publications and the connections between different nations. The analysis was performed in the VOSviewer software. VOSviewer is a widely used tool for bibliometric and network analysis, enabling clear and interactive visualization of scientific data [68]. Thus, the figure helps identify the main collaborating countries and their impact on the scientific production related to the topic reviewed in this work.

The profile displayed in Fig. 2A, B demonstrates a significant concentration of scientific output in Asia, underscoring the region's leading role in research and development of novel antimicrobial agents derived from Streptomyces. These findings are consistent with those of Leite et al. [69], who identified Asia as the region with the highest number of patents related to bioactive compounds produced by Streptomyces species with antimicrobial activity. This could be related to public policies that foster technological innovation, alongside a well-established tradition in industrial microbiology and microbial bioprospecting [69].

Although microbial diversity is globally distributed, scientific advances in Actinobacteria research are largely concentrated in countries with robust infrastructure and funding. China has become a global leader in scientific output due to strategic investments in science and technology, particularly in biotechnology and public health [70]. Similarly, Japan’s prominence stems from a strong post-war tradition in antibiotic discovery and the work of key research institutions dedicated to novel antimicrobials [69].

5.2 Ecological origins of actinobacteria-derived metabolites

Regarding the sources of isolation of antimicrobial-producing actinobacteria, the presence of these microorganisms was observed in diverse environments, with emphasis on soil (40%), marine sediments (23%), plants (10%) and, animals (8%) (Fig. 2B). This can be attributed to the high complexity of terrestrial environments [71]. However, in recent decades, a growing number of studies have shown that obtaining new species of Streptomyces from terrestrial environments has become progressively more limited, with the rediscovery/reisolation of secondary metabolites already known to be produced by these bacteria being frequent [72]. In this context, actinobacteria from marine ecosystems have stood out for their remarkable biosynthetic potential. This chemical diversity is strongly influenced by the adverse physical–chemical conditions of these habitats, including extreme variations in pressure, salinity, light, and temperature [73, 74]. Furthermore, bioactive compounds obtained from marine microorganisms have proven to be particularly promising, due to the greater probability of presenting novel chemical structures and relevant pharmacological activities [75].

Several microbial communities have been identified within the internal tissues of plants as endophytes, which perform ecologically significant functions in the plant environment, being recognized for their ability to produce compounds that promote plant growth, act as repellents against insects and phytopathogens, and contribute to the tolerance of adverse abiotic stress conditions [76, 77]. In addition, actinobacteria have increasingly been recognized for their symbiotic associations with eukaryotic hosts, being widely distributed both on the external surfaces and in the digestive tract of various animals. Interestingly, certain insects show a functional dependence on these bacteria for nutritional supplementation, highlighting their ecological and functional importance in mutualistic relationships [6, 7]. Thus, actinobacteria continues to represent a promising yet underexplored reservoirs of bioactive compounds.

5.3 Classification and overview of antimycobacterial metabolites from actinobacteria

Regarding antimycobacterial potential of the retrieved metabolites, the compounds were classified based on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, being categorized as follows: compounds with MIC > 10.0 μM were considered to have weak activity, those with MIC between 1.0 μM and 10.0 μM were classified as having moderate activity, while compounds with MIC < 1.0 μM were classified as potent. All the substances analyzed are listed in Tables 1, 2, 3. The compiled data presents the Actinobacteria specie, isolation source, local/country of isolation, and MIC, in μg/mL and μM. The chemical structures were drawn in the ChemDraw software 23.1.2 and are presented in Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11. For the purposes of in-depth analysis and discussions, we selected only the compounds that demonstrated moderate and potent activity, since these may have greater pharmacological relevance in the context of the development of new antitubercular agents.

Table 1

NRP from Actinobacteria with antimycobacterial activity

Metabolite Actinobacteria specie Countrya Source Microorganism-test MIC (μM) MIC (μg/mL) Reference
Actinomycin D Streptomyces griseoruber NBRC 12873 IN Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.62 0.78 [82]
Actinomycin X2 Streptomyces smyrnaeus UKAQ_2 SA Mangroove Mtb H37Ra 1.23 1.56 [83]
M. bovis BCG 1.23 1.56
Mtb H37Rv 2.08 2.64
Actinomycin D Mtb H37Ra 1.24 1.56
M. bovis BCG 1.24 1.56
Mtb H37Rv 1.43 1.8
Actinomycin X0β Streptomyces avermitilis MS449 CN Marine sediment M. bovis BCG 0.20 0.25–0.5 [84]
Mtb H37Rv 6.29 8.0
Actinomycin X2 M. bovis BCG 0.20 0.25–0.5
Mtb H37Rv 0.79 1.0
Actinomycin D M. bovis BCG 0.20 0.25–0.5
Mtb H37Rv 6.37 8.0
Actinomycin C1 Streptomyces sp. ⅢM06 IN Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.05 0.0625 [85]
Actinomycin C2 0.03 0.039
Actinomycin C3 0.03 0.039
Actinomycin D Streptomyces sp. InaCC A758 ID Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.62 0.78 [86]
Cyclomarin A Streptomyces sp. MM334-153F1 JP Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.48 0.5 [87]
Mtb XDR-Mtb5 1.92 2.0
Mtb XDR-Mtb44 7.19 7.5
M. smegmatis 0.45 0.47
Cyclomarin C Streptomyces sp. BCC26924 TH Soil Mtb H37Ra 0.10 0.10 [88]
Echinomycin Streptomyces sp. LS462 CN Soil M. bovis BCG 0.09 0.1 [89]
Mtb H37Rv 0.45 0.5
Rufomycin NBZ1 Streptomyces atratus MJM3502 KR Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.25 [90]
Rufomycin NBZ2 0.44
Rufomycin NBZ3 0.84
Rufomycin NBZ4 > 10
Rufomycin NBZ5 0.11
Rufomycin NBZ6 0.57
Rufomycin NBZ7 0.10
Rufomycin NBZ8 0.03
Rufomiazine > 10
Ilamycin B2 0.2
Ilammycin B1 1.7
Epimeric mixture C-32 RUFs Ⅰ and Ⅱ 0.02
Ilamycin G Streptomyces atratus SCSIO CN Marine sediment Mtb H37Rv 9.5 [91]
Ilamycin H 9.5
Ilamycin I 1.2
Ilamycin J 0.0096
Ilamycin K 1.4
Ilamycin L 0.24
Ilamycin M 2.3
Ilamycin N 9.6
Ilamycin O 10.0
Ilamycin P 1.4
Ilamycin Q 1.4
Ilamycin R 1.2
Tuberactinomycin A Streptomyces griseoverticillatus JP Soil Mtb ATCC 607 17.81 12.5 [92]
Tuberactinomycin B 4.67 3.2
Hytramycin V Streptomyces hygroscopicus ECUM 14046 NA NA Mtb H37Rv 17.84 11.3 [93]
Main Mtb global clades 14.68–36.15 9.3–22.9
Mtb resistant strains: streptomycin (rSM, ATCC 35820), rifampicin (rRMP, ATCC 35838) 15.16–18.32 9.6–11.6
Hytramycin I Mtb H37Rv 9.27 6.0
Main Mtb global clades 6.80–7.42 4.4–4.8
Mtb resistant strains: streptomycin (rSM, ATCC 35820), rifampicin (rRMP, ATCC 35838) 7.26 4.7–4.7
Atrovimycin Streptomyces atrovirens LQ13 CN Soil Mtb H37Rv 1.88 2.5 [94]
Ohmyungsamycin A Actinobacteria strain SNJ042 KR Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.06 57.0 [95]
Ohmyungsamycin B 0.12 117.0
Munumbicin B Streptomyces sp. NRRL 30562 AU Plant-associated (Kennedia nigriscans) Mtb MDR 7.88 10.0 [96]
Mtb H37Rv 36.23 46.0
Munumbicin C Mtb MDR 96.26 > 125
Mtb H37Rv 115.52 > 150
Atratumycin Streptomyces atratus SCSIO ZH16 CN Marine sediment Mtb H37Ra 3.8 [97]
Mtb H37Rv 14.6
Nosiheptide Streptomyces sp. OPMA 1245 JP Marine sediment M. bovis BCG 0.01 0.012 [98]
M. avium JCM15430 0.02 0.024
M. intracellulare JCM6384 0.02 0.024
M. smegmatis M341 5.11 6.25
Griseoviridin M. bovis BCG 13.09 6.25
M. avium JCM15430 3.27 1.56
M. intracellulare JCM6384 3.27 1.56
M. smegmatis M341 209.42 > 100
Etamycin M. bovis BCG 0.89 0.78
M. avium JCM15430 0.11 0.097
M. intracellulare JCM6384 0.22 0.19
M. smegmatis M341 28.44 25.0
Mollemycin A Streptomyces sp. CMBM0244 AU Marine sediment M. bovis BCG 3.2 [99]
Wollamide A Streptomyces sp. MST-115088 AU Soil M. bovis BCG 2.8 [100]
Wollamide B 3.1
Ecumicin Nonomuraea sp. MJM5123 NA NA Mtb H37Rv 0.16 [101]
Mtb H37Rv 0.12
Mtb 0.31
Lassomycin Lentzea kentuckyensis US Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.41–0.83 0.78–1.56 [102]
M. avium sub sp. Paratuberculosis 0.07–0.13 0.125–0.25
Svetamycin A Streptomyces sp. DSM 14386 DE NA Mtb H37Rv 103.96 65.6 [103]
M. smegmatis 50.71 32.0
Svetamycin C Mtb H37Rv 51.93 54.0
M. smegmatis 12.14 8.0
Svetamycin G M. smegmatis 2.84 2.0
Pyridomycin Dactylosporangium fulvum JP Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.72 0.39 [104]
M. bovis BCG 0.72 0.39
M. smegmatis 1.44 0.78
M. marinum 5.79 3.13
M. abcessus 11.56 6.25
M. bolletii 11.56 6.25
M. massiliense 11.56 6.25
M. avium 23.12 12.5
Cyclic peptide 9 Streptomyces sp. MS110128 CN Marine sediment M. bovis BCG 16.84 12.5 [105]
Cyclic peptide 10 16.48 12.5
Cyclic peptide 11 1.68 1.25
Cyclic peptide 12 1.65 1.25
Taeanamide A Streptomyces sp. AMD43 KR Soil Mtb mc2 6230 27.0 [106]
Taeanamide B 63.0
Thiolopyrrolone A Streptomyces sp. BTBU20218885 CN Soil M. bovis BCG 16.11 10.0 [107]
Mtb H37Rv 0.50 0.3125
Thiolutin M. bovis BCG 43.80 10.0
Mtb H37Rv 2.74 0.625
NA: not available
aTwo-letter country codes defined in ISO 3166–1.

Table 2

Antimycobacterial Polyketides Isolated from Actinobacteria

Metabolite Actinobacteria specie Countrya Source Microorganism-test MIC (μM) MIC (μg/mL) Reference
Niphimycin C Streptomyces sp. IMB7-145 CN Marine sediment Mtb H37Rv 3.50 4.0 [160]
Niphimycin Iα 3.50 4.0
Mimosamycin Streptomyces lavendulae NA NA Mycobacterium sp. 607 107.19 25.0 [161]
M. avium 107.19 25.0
Mtb H37Rv 13.40 3.125
Mtb Matsudo 6.69 1.56
Mtb SM-R 6.69 1.56
M. bovis 10 26.80 6.25
M. bovis BCG 13.40 3.125
Lincolnenin A Streptomyces lincolnensis ACM-4234 US NA Mtb H37Ra 0.9 [162]
Lincolnenin B 30.0
Lincolnenin C 16.2
Dynactin Streptomyces puniceus AS13 IN Soil Mtb H37Rv 1.31 1.0 [163]
Aranciamycin I Streptomyces sp. CMB-M0150 AU Marine sediment M. bovis BCG 10 [164]
Aranciamycin J 10
Aranciamycin A 30
Aranciamycin 30
Azalomycin B/elaiophylin Streptomyces sp. BCC71188 TH Soil Mtb H37Ra 0.76 0.78 [165]
11,11'-O–dimethylelaiophylin 2.97 3.13
Efomycin G 11.87 12.0
Boromycin Streptomyces antibioticus CI Soil Mtb H37Rv 0.08 [166]
M. bovis BCG 0.2
Lobophorin I Streptomyces sp. 1053U.I.1a.3b PH Animal-associated (Lienardia totopotens) Mtb H37Ra 2.6 [167]
Lobophorin F 7.8
Lobophorin B 1.3
Lobophorin C 1.4
Lobophorin G Streptomyces sp. MS100061 CN Marine sediment M. bovis BCG 1.3 1.56 [168]
Mtb H37Rv 26.68 32.0
Lobophorin A M. bovis BCG 1.35 1.56
Mtb H37Rv 27.65 32.0
Lobophorin B M. bovis BCG 0.65 0.78
Mtb H37Rv 13.47 16.0
Steffimycin B Streptomyces scabrisporus MX Plant-associated (Amphipterygium adstringen) Mtb H37Rv 13.25 7.8 [169]
Mtb H37Ra 0.01 0.006
Mtb MDR 6.63 3.9
Steffimycin Streptomyces sp. OPMA02852 US Soil M. bovis BCG 1.36 0.78 [170]
M. avium 2.72 1.56
M. intracellulare 0.68 0.39
M. smegmatis 2.72 1.56
10-dihydrosteffimycin M. bovis BCG 21.68 12.5
M. avium 5.43 3.13
M. intracellulare 1.36 0.78
M. smegmatis 5.45 3.14
8-demethoxysteffimycin M. bovis BCG 5.75 3.13
M. avium 11.48 6.25
M. intracellulare 0.72 0.39
M. smegmatis 5.75 3.13
Steffimycin C Streptomyces sp. BCC27095 TH Soil Mtb H37Ra 0.32 [171]
10-Dihydrosteffimycin B 0.66
Steffimycin B 0.0052
7-deoxysteffimycinone 3.92
Treponemycin Streptomyces sp. MS-6–6 SA Soil Mtb ATCC 25177 8.52 4.17 [172]
Chrysomycin A Streptomyces sp. OA161 IN Soil Mtb H37Rv 6.15 3.125 [173]
Urdamycinone E Streptomyces sp. BCC45596 TH Animal-associated (Xestospongia sp.) Mtb H37Ra 5.88 3.13 [174]
Urdamycinone G 24.31 12.5
Dehydroxyaquayamycin 14.39 6.25
Urdamycin E 14.03 12.5
Kimidinomycin Streptomyces sp. KKTA-0263 NA NA M. bovis BCG 23.66 25.0 [175]
M. avium 11.83 12.5
M. intracellulare 0.74 0.78
M. smegmatis 11.83 12.5
Diazaquinomycin A Micromonospora maritima B026 US Lake sediment Mtb H37Rv 0.28 0.10–0.72 [176]
MDR Mtb strains 0.17 0.06- 0.27
M. abscessus 21.16 > 7.5
M. chelonae 21.16 > 7.5
M. marinum 21.16 > 7.5
M. kansasii 21.16 > 7.5
M. avium 10.86 3.85
M. smegmatis 12.87 4.56
M. bovis 0.34 0.12
Diazaquinomycin J Mtb H37Rv 0.18 0.07
Diazaquinomycin H Mtb H37Rv 0.10 0.04
Methyl aeruginoate Streptomyces sp. TBRC7642 TH Plant-associated (Epipremnum aureum) Mtb H37Ra 105.93 25.0 [177]
(R)-desferri-ferrithiocinmethylester 139.51 50.0
Desferri-ferrithiocin-4-hydroxyphenethylester 34.91 12.5
Furaquinocin D 129.40 50.0
Murayaquinone 9.65 3.13
Efomycin G Streptomyces sp. BCC72023 TH Plant-associated (Oriza sativa) Mtb H37Ra 11.87 12.0 [178]
Oxohygrolidine 86.99 50.0
29-O-Methylabierixin 67.70 50.0
Napyradiomycin B7a Streptomyces sp. CA-271078 ST Animal-associated (ascidian) Mtb H37Ra 24.13 12.0–24.0 [179]
Napyradiomycin SC 46.57 24.0–48.0
Napiradiomycin D1 50.06 24.0–48.0
3-chloro-6,8-dihydroxy-8-α-lapachone 38.87 12.0–24.0
Napyradiomycin B6 24.09 12.0–24.0
Napyradiomycin A2a 96.74 48.0–96.0
Napyradiomycin A2b 96.74 48.0–96.0
Napyradiomycin B4 22.48 12.0–24.0
Napyradiomycin B2 50.31 24.0–48.0
Napiradiomycin B5 45.97 24.0–48.0
Nibomycin Streptomyces sp. MS44 JP Marine sediment Mtb H37Rv 14.08 4.2 [180]
Mtb T1413 21.12 6.3
Mtb T1538 17.43 5.2
Frenolicin A Streptomyces sp. TBRC17107 TH Animal-associated (Cossus chloratus) Mtb H37Ra 72.19 25.0 [181]
Frenolicin G 34.40 25.0
Desertomycin G Streptomyces althioticus MSM3 ES Plant-associated (green algae) Mtb H37Rv 13.28 16.0 [182]
Mtb MDR-1 13.28 16.0
Mtb MDR-2 13.28 16.0
Desertomycin A Streptomyces flavofungini TRM90047 CN Soil Mtb 20.96 25.0 [183]
Desertomycin 44–1 20.98 25.0
Desertomycin 44–2 48.56 50.0
Panosialin A Streptomyces sp. AN1761 KR Soil Mtb H37Rv 532.67 256.0 [184]
Panosialin B 532.67 256.0
Panosialin wA 319.52 128.0
Panosialin wB 319.52 128.0
Gwanacoside A Streptomyces sp. GA02 KR Soil Mtb mc2 6230 28.02 15.0 [185]
Phitsanoside B Streptomyces sp. TBRC 11511 TH Soil Mtb 93.25 25.0 [186]
Proximycin B Verrucosispora sp. MS100047 CN Marine sediment Mtb H37Rv 60.47 25.0 [187]
M. bovis BCG 15.12 6.25
Dumulmycin Streptomyces sp. DM28 KR Marine sediment Mtb mc2 6230 27.1 [188]
Hydroxycapsimycin Streptomyces sp. KKMA-0239 JP Marine sediment M. avium 92.54 > 50 [189]
KOmav5 92.54 > 50
KOmav10 92.54 > 50
M. intracellulare 92.54 50.0
Brokamycin M. avium 80.62 > 50
KOmav5 80.62 > 50
KOmav10 80.62 50.0
M. intracellulare 20.15 12.5
Ikarugamycin M. avium 52.24 25.0
KOmav5 104.47 > 50
KOmav10 104.47 50.0
M. intracellulare 52.24 25.0
Platensimycin Streptomyces platensis NA NA M. smegmatis 31.71 14.0 [190]
Mtb H37Rv 27.18 12.0
Mtb CDC1551 27.18 12.0
M. bovis BCG 289.92 > 128
NA: not available
aTwo-letter country codes defined in ISO 3166–1

Table 3

Antimycobacterial metabolites from Actinobacteria: Nucleotides, aminoglycosides, and miscellaneous compounds

Metabolite Actinobacteria specie Countrya Source Microorganism-test MIC (μM) MIC (μg/mL) Reference
Mavintramycin A Streptomyces sp. OPMA40551 JP Marine sediment M. avium JCM15430 1.62 0.78 [239]
M. intracellulare JCM6384 0.81 0.39
M. smegmatis mc2 155 6.50 3.12
M. bovis BCG 3.25 1.56
Mavintramycin B M. avium JCM15430 12.30 6.25
M. intracellulare JCM6384 6.14 3.12
M. smegmatis mc2 155 24.59 12.5
M. bovis BCG 12.30 6.25
Mavintramycin C M. avium JCM15430 104.11 > 50
M. intracellulare JCM6384 52.06 25.0
M. smegmatis mc2 155 104.11 > 50
M. bovis BCG 13.01 6.25
Mavintramycin D M. avium JCM15430 51.84 25.0
M. intracellulare JCM6384 12.96 6.25
M. smegmatis mc2 155 51.84 25.0
M. bovis BCG 12.96 6.25
Mavintramycin E M. avium JCM15430 21.28 12.5
M. intracellulare JCM6384 21.28 12.5
M. smegmatis mc2 155 85.14 50.0
M. bovis BCG 10.64 6.25
Mavintramycin F M. avium JCM15430 6.31 3.12
M. intracellulare JCM6384 1.58 0.78
M. smegmatis mc2 155 6.31 3.12
M. bovis BCG 3.16 1.56
Mavintramycin G M. avium JCM15430 6.35 3.12
M. intracellulare JCM6384 1.59 0.78
M. smegmatis mc2 155 25.45 12.5
M. bovis BCG 0.79 0.39
Amicetin M. avium JCM15430 5.04 3.12
M. intracellulare JCM6384 5.04 3.12
M. smegmatis mc2 155 2.52 1.56
M. bovis BCG 0.63 0.39
Plicacetin M. avium JCM15430 6.03 3.12
M. intracellulare JCM6384 6.03 3.12
M. smegmatis mc2 155 6.03 3.12
M. bovis BCG 1.51 0.78
Caprazamycin B Streptomyces sp. MK730-62F2 JP NA Mtb H37Rv 2.73 3.13 [240]
M. bovis 2.73 3.13
Drug susceptible Mtb 5.45 6.25–12.5
MDR Mtb 5.45 6.25–12.5
M. avium 5.45 6.25–50.0
M. intracellulare 1.36 1.56–25.0
Streptothricin E Streptomyces sp. I08A 1776 CN Soil Mtb H37Rv 1.59 1.0 [241]
Mtb 164 0.79 0.5
Mtb 926 0.40 0.25
Streptcytosine A Streptomyces sp. TPU1236A JP Marine sediment M. smegmatis 50.74 32.0 [242]
Plicacetin 61.82 32.0
Bamicetin 26.46 16.0
Carbazomycin D 87.61 25.0
Pimprinine 126.12 25.0
Kandenol A Streptomyces sp. HKI0595 CN Plant-associated (Kandelia candel) M. vaccae IMET 10670 49.53 12.5 [243]
Kandenol B 46.58 12.5
Kandenol C 43.96 12.5
Kandenol D 93.16 25.0
Kandenol E 49.93 12.5
(2S,2"S)-6-lavandulyl-7,4'-dimethoxy-5,2'-dihydroxylflavanone Streptomyces sp. G248 VN Animal-associated (Halichondria panicea) Mtb H37Rv 106.15 48.0 [244]
(2S,2"S)-6-lavandulyl-7-methoxy-5,2',4'-trihydroxyflavanone 13.69 6.0
6-prenyl-4'-methoxy-5,7-dihydroxyflavanone 31.32 11.1
2,4-di-tert-butylphenol Streptomyces bacillaris ANS2 IN Soil Mtb MDR 242.37 100.0–50.0 [245]
Mtb H37Rv 48.47 10.0–50.0
NA: not available
aTwo-letter country codes defined in ISO 3166–1

Fig. 3

Chemical structures of antimycobacterial NRP metabolites

Fig. 4

Chemical structures of antimycobacterial NRP metabolites

Fig. 5

Chemical structures of antimycobacterial NRP metabolites

Fig. 6

Chemical structures of PKS-derived antimycobacterial metabolites

Fig. 7

Chemical structures of PKS-derived antimycobacterial metabolites

Fig. 8

Chemical structures of PKS-derived antimycobacterial metabolites

Fig. 9

Chemical structures of PKS-derived antimycobacterial metabolites

Fig. 10

Chemical structures nucleotide-derived antimycobacterial metabolites

Fig. 11

Chemical structures of antimycobacterial metabolites

5.3.1 Peptide antibiotics

The non-ribosomal peptide synthesis (NRPS) pathway is mediated by large multifunctional enzymes and is characterized by the production of non-ribosomal peptides (NRP), which are not encoded by genes and are not restricted to the 20 conventional amino acids. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) use proteinogenic and non-proteinogenic amino acids as building blocks for the peptide chain. As a result, the products generated by this pathway present a great structural diversity and a broad spectrum of biological activities, making them valuable for application in agriculture and medicine [7880]. Some common characteristics among NRP include their highly specific structure, which ensures bioactivity through a precise orientation, essential to interact with a molecular target; in addition, macrocyclization is an important characteristic, in which distant parts of the linear peptide precursor are covalently linked to each other [81]. Table 1 presents NRP isolated from different Actinomycetota species, along with their respective MIC values against mycobacterial strains.

Actinomycins. Actinomycins are chromogenic cyclic peptides, first discovered in 1940 [108]. These substances stand out for being antibiotics and anticancer agents, isolated from several species of Streptomyces, of which, to date, about 30 natural and synthetic analogues have been discovered [109, 110]. These actinomycins are composed of a chromophore group and two pentapeptide chains, whose amino acid composition varies (Fig. 3).

Our analysis revealed that actinomycins exhibiting antitubercular activity were isolated from five distinct Streptomyces species, including S. griseoruber, S. smyrnaeus, S. avermitilis, and two unclassified Streptomyces species. Praveen and Tripathi [82] evaluated the actinomycin D activity against Mtb H37Rv, reporting a MIC value of 0.62 µM. Qureshi et al. [83] isolated both actinomycin D and actinomycin X2, which exhibited MIC values of 2.08 µM and 1.43 µM, respectively, against Mtb H37Rv. Similarly, Chen et al. [84] reported the isolation of actinomycin D, actinomycin X2, and actinomycin X0β. These compounds displayed MIC of 6.37 µM, 0.79 µM, and 6.29 µM, respectively, against Mtb H37Rv. In another study, Shah et al. [85] isolated actinomycin D, actinomycin X2, and actinomycin C3. These compounds demonstrated particularly potent activity against Mtb H37Rv, with MIC of 0.05 µM, 0.03 µM, and 0.03 µM, respectively. Rakhmawatie et al. [86] also reported the isolation of actinomycin D, which exhibited an MIC of 0.62 µM.

Structurally, actinomycins X2 and X0β are closely related to actinomycin D, with variation arising from the substitution of the proline residue in the polypeptide ring. Replacement by 4-trans-hydroxyproline or 4-oxo-proline yields actinomycin X0β and X2, respectively [111] (Fig. 3). In contrast, actinomycin C3 contains modifications in the D-valine residues of the polypeptide ring, which are replaced by D-allo-isoleucine [111] (Fig. 3). Among these compounds, actinomycin D is the most studied analog and continues to be widely used in the treatment of various types of cancer, especially in pediatric oncology and has been gaining prominence for its antimicrobial potential [112].

From a biochemical point of view, actinomycin D's mechanism of action is based on its ability to intercalate between GC base pairs, preventing the progression of RNA polymerase and, blocking gene transcription [113, 114]. Despite their high bioactive potential, the toxicity associated with actinomycins still represents a major obstacle to their wider clinical use [115]. However, given the global crisis of antimicrobial resistance and the urgent need for new anti-TB therapies, the re-evaluation of classic molecules, such as actinomycins, has emerged as a viable strategy. The rational use of these molecules, combined with structural modification approaches, encapsulation or combination with other agents, can reduce their side effects and broaden their therapeutic applicability.

Echinomycin. Echinomycin is a cyclic depsipeptide antibiotic known for its extensive activities against bacteria and tumor cells (Fig. 3). This compound belongs to the quinoxaline family and originates from different species of Streptomyces, Echinomycin promotes DNA damage, cell apoptosis and inhibition of bacterial RNA synthesis [89]. This substance was the first DNA bisintercalator identified, having the ability to reversibly bind to the double helix in a sequence-independent fashion, inserting one or more aromatic ring groups between adjacent base pairs. Thus, echinomycin bound to DNA inhibits transcription in bacteria, chromatin condensation and DNA replication in eukaryotic organisms, leading to cell cycle arrest [116].

The study conducted by Chen et al. [89] observed that echinomycin obtained exhibited a MIC of 0.45 μM against Mtb H37Rv. However, according to Gade et al. [117], despite its potent antimicrobial activity, echinomycin is not used clinically due to solubility and toxicity concerns. The study of Foster et al. [118] investigated the toxicity of echinomycin in mice and Beagle dogs through intravenous injections administered over five consecutive days, and the primary toxic effects were observed in the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and lymphoreticular systems.

Cyclomarins. Cyclomarins A and C are heptapeptide cyclopeptides biosynthesized via the NRPS, sharing a similar central structure but presenting crucial differences in their side chains (Fig. 3). Cyclomarin A demonstrated high activity against the virulent strain of Mtb, with a MIC of 0.48 µM [87] while cyclomarin C was capable of inhibiting Mtb H37Ra with a MIC of 0.10 µM [88].

The main distinction between these two compounds lies in the chemical modification of the hydroxylated tryptophan residue. Cyclomarin A contains an epoxide group on the side of this residue, specifically an N-(1,1-dimethyl-2,3-epoxypropyl) substitution [119, 120]. This structural difference has direct implications for the bioactivity of the compounds. Studies have shown that the presence of the epoxide group in cyclomarin A is essential for its potent activity against Mtb, since this functional group is involved in the interaction with the target protein caseinolytic protease C1 (ClpC1). In contrast, cyclomarin C, which lacks this modification, has considerably reduced antimicrobial activity, showing that small structural changes can significantly impact the pharmacological efficacy of the molecule [119].

Currently, the information available on the toxicological profile of cyclomarins is still scarce. The presence of the epoxide group in the structure of cyclomarin A, although essential for its bioactivity, represents a highly reactive functional structure that can interact non-specifically with host macromolecules, raising concerns about toxicity [119, 121]. The possibility of side effects related to cross-inhibition of human proteases or other homologous structural chaperones represents a significant limitation for the clinical use of these compounds, if a satisfactorily high therapeutic index is lacking [114, 122124].

Rufomycins and ilamycins. Rufomycins and ilamycins are cyclic heptapeptides that feature an isoprenyl group attached to the nitrogen of the tryptophan ring [125] (Fig. 3). These compounds have been increasingly recognized for their potential in the treatment of TB, particularly for their inhibitory action on ClpC1, a validated and essential target for Mtb viability [126].

In the study conducted by Zhou et al. [90] eight new rufomycins compounds were evaluated for their antimycobacterial activity against a virulent strain of Mtb H37Rv. The results revealed a broad range of potencies, with MIC values ranging from 0.030 μM to greater than 10 μM. The presence of an epoxide ring in the prenyl group of tryptophan was strongly correlated with increased antimicrobial activity, while the absence of functional groups such as N-methylleucine (N-MeLeu) and m-nitro-tyrosine (m-NO₂-Tyr) resulted in the compounds losing their efficacy.

Sun et al. [91] isolated twelve ilamycins (G to R, also referred to as rufomycins), and evaluated their activity against Mtb H37Rv, yielding MIC of 0.0096–9.6 μM (Table 1). It was observed that structural modification involving reduction and cyclization at position C-33 significantly enhances the biological activity of these compounds. In contrast, oxidation at C-15 did not substantially affect activity, while oxidation at C-32 resulted in a loss of efficacy. Conversely, in another analysis, oxidation at C-15 compromised activity, whereas oxidation at C-32 contributed positively. Furthermore, the presence of a nitro group at C-43 plays a crucial role in maintaining or enhancing the observed antitubercular activity.

Although the bioactivity data is significant, authors also reported concerns about the toxicity of these compounds. Rufomycins, in particular, showed relevant cellular toxicity in murine macrophage models, with relatively low selectivity indices for some analogues, which may limit their direct clinical application without additional structural modifications [90]. These findings indicate that, although potent, these compounds may interfere with conserved cellular pathways in host cells, which calls for further investigation into their safety. Thus, the studies involving rufomycins and ilamycins reinforce the high potential of these cyclopeptides as ClpC1 inhibitors, representing a promising new class of anti-TB agents.

Tuberactinomycins. Tuberactinomycins are a family of cyclic peptide antibiotics, including viomycin and capreomycin, that exhibit potent activity against Mtb, particularly MDR and XDR strains. Structurally, they feature a unique hexapeptide core with non-proteinogenic amino acids and a guanidine group critical for ribosomal targeting [127] (Fig. 4). Their mechanism involves binding to the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits at the interface, specifically disrupting tRNA accommodation during translocation (A- to P-site movement) and inhibiting protein synthesis.

Tuberactinomycins have historically been employed as second-line therapeutic agents in the treatment of MDR-TB [127]. However, despite their efficacy, clinical use is limited by nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity, though they remain WHO-recommended for MDR-TB when safer options (e.g., bedaquiline) are unavailable.

Viomycin was the first member of the class to be isolated and was later identified as chemically identical to tuberactinomycin B. Capreomycin, isolated from Streptomyces capreolus, was initially described as a mixture of four distinct components (capreomycins IA, IB, ⅡA, and ⅡB), which were subsequently differentiated based on structural substituents. Despite this chemical complexity, capreomycin has been clinically used as a combined formulation of all four components.

In the study by Rokuro et al. [92] tuberactinomycins A and B was isolated from the soil actinobacteria Streptomyces griseoverticillatus and inhibited Mtb ATCC 607 with MIC of 17.81 μM and 4.67 μM, respectively. Although current clinical guidelines restrict their use due to toxicity concerns, their retained efficacy against resistant strains suggests potential for revitalization. Prior research indicates that modulating culture conditions [128] or engineering BGC could yield novel analogs with improved pharmacological profiles. Semi-synthetic modifications of these ciclopeptides may further expand the therapeutic utility. Beyond TB, repurposed tuberactinomycins could address other priority pathogens, as evidenced by viomycin’s activity against other priority pathogens, as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [129, 130].

Hytramycins. Hytramycin I and V are cyclohexapeptides, each bearing three unusual piperazic acid moieties, two adjacent and the third flanked by another amino acid [93, 131] (Fig. 4). Both compounds were tested against Mtb H37Rv and exhibited MIC of 17.84 μM and 9.27 μM, respectively. In addition, the MIC against nonreplicating Mtb fall into the range of some existing second-line anti-TB drugs, such as streptomycin and capreomycin, respectively. However, the IC50’s of hytramycin V and I against Vero cells were 24.2 and 7.7 μg/mL, resulting in rather poor selectivity indices (SI = IC50/ MIC) [93].

Atrovimycin. Atrovimycin is a cyclodepsipeptide isolated from Streptomyces atrovirens LQ13 and showed promising antimycobacterial activity, with an MIC value of 1.88 µM against Mtb H37Rv [94]. Structurally, atrovimycin stands out for the presence of a vicinally hydroxylated acyl cinnamic chain, considered rare and potentially relevant to its biological activity (Fig. 4).

In view of the good in vitro results, the authors moved on to in vivo tests in murine model of TB. The effects of oral administration of atrovimycin were compared with those of two reference drugs in the treatment of TB, rifampicin and ethambutol. The results revealed that atrovimycin was able to significantly reduce the pulmonary bacterial load, achieving an efficacy similar to that of ethambutol. Compared to rifampicin, considered the gold standard in the treatment of TB, atrovimycin showed slightly less activity, although still significant. Importantly, while rifampicin promoted a more marked reduction in bacterial load, atrovimycin demonstrated a superior safety profile, once the treated mice showed no obvious signs of clinical or behavioral toxicity, and histological examinations indicated no relevant liver or kidney damage [94]. These data suggest that atrovimycin combines significant anti-TB activity with low toxic potential, making it a promising candidate for future stages of pre-clinical development.

Ohmyungsamycins. Ohmyungsamycin A and ohmyungsamycin B are characterized as cyclic peptides with cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities [132] (Fig. 4). These compounds were tested against Mtb H37Rv and exhibited MIC values of 0.06 μM and 0.12 μM, respectively. In mice infected with Mtb, the compounds were able to activate the autophagy pathway mediated by AMP-activated protein kinase, promoting the intracellular elimination of the bacillus by macrophages. This mechanism is of great relevance, since the activation of autophagy represents an effective cellular strategy in containing chronic infections, such as TB [95]. At the same time, a negative modulation of the exacerbated inflammatory response was observed, with a significant reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 in lung tissues.

The dual action of these compounds, as antimicrobial agents and immunomodulators, extends their therapeutic value, especially in the context of persistent infections and resistant forms of TB, where the immune system's ability to control the pathogen is limited. Moreover, the compounds showed no significant toxicity for Drosophila melanogaster flies, which reinforces their preliminary pharmacological safety and viability as candidates for clinical development.

Munumbicins. Munumbicins belong to the group of polycyclic aromatic antibiotics with antimicrobial, antimalarial and antitumor properties. Structurally, munumbicins are classified as cyclic depsipeptides with variations in aromatic substituents and side chains, which confer different degrees of polarity, stability and biological activity [96].

Castillo et al. [96] isolated munumbicin B and munumbicin C (Fig. 4) and tested against Mtb H37Rv, yielding MIC values of 35.43 μM and 115.52 μM, and against multidrug-resistant MDR Mtb, with MIC of 7.88 μM and 98.46 μM, respectively. The authors state that although munumbicins have therapeutic potential and activity against cancer cells, their clinical advancement depends on additional studies of cellular and clinical toxicity, since they demonstrate toxic effects in high concentrations on normal human cells. Therefore, chemical modification of these compounds, aiming to reduce toxicity and increase efficacy, may be an essential strategy to enable their use as antimalarial, anticancer or anti-infectious agents [96].

Atratumycin. Atratumycin is a cyclic decapeptide featuring a unique 3-(2-methylphenyl)-2(E)-propenoic acid moiety appended to the amino acid chain (Fig. 4). Atratumycin was tested against Mtb H37Ra and H37Rv and exhibited a MIC of 3.8 and 14.6 μM, respectively [97]. Although the MIC value is slightly higher when compared to other natural products such as cyclomarins or ilamycins, the therapeutic relevance of atratumycin is reinforced by its favorable toxicity profile, which is a critical attribute in the early stages of drug development.

Regarding cytotoxicity, atratumycin was tested against a panel of human cancer cell lineages as well as non-cancerous human lineages. The compound exhibited no significant toxicity across all tested cell lines even at high concentrations (> 50 μM), suggesting low off-target cytotoxicity and high therapeutic selectivity. Based on these findings, the authors proposed atratumycin as promising candidate for the development of novel anti-TB agents, especially due to its balanced profile of antimicrobial efficacy and cellular safety. Considering their structural features, the cyclic peptide backbone, combined with the unique aromatic moiety, offers a structurally versatile scaffold that may be further optimized through synthetic modification to enhance potency and selectivity.

Nosiheptide, griseoviridin and etamycin. Nosiheptide, also known as multiomycin, is a thiopeptic antibiotic isolated in 1970 [133] (Fig. 4). Its mechanism of action is based on the inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis by blocking the elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G, which are essential for the ribosomal translation process [134]. Griseoviridin and etamycin (viridogrisein) (Fig. 4) are natural antibiotics of the streptogramin class, belonging to distinct subclasses that act synergistically, enhancing antibacterial activity [135].

In the study conducted by Hosoda et al. [98], three compounds were isolated from Streptomyces sp. OPMA1245, obtained from marine sediments in Japan, and were tested against M. bovis, M. avium, M. intracellulare, and M. smegmatis. The study show that the three substances have remarkable inhibitory activity. Nosiheptide exhibited MIC values of 0.01 μM, 0.02 μM, 0.02 μM, and 5.11 μM, respectively. Griseoviridin showed MIC of 13.09 μM, 3.27 μM, 3.27 μM, and 209.42 μM, respectively. Finally, etamycin demonstrated MIC values of 0.89 μM, 0.11 μM, 0.22 μM, and 28.44 μM, respectively.

These antibiotics act by inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis, a mechanism of action that may be particularly effective against mycobacteria of the M. avium complex, considering the peculiar structure of their cell wall and their recognized resistance to multiple drugs. Considering the limitations of currently available treatments for infections caused by this mycobacterial complex, the results obtained reinforce the relevance of these substances as promising candidates for the development of new antibiotics or complementary therapeutic strategies.

Mollemycin. Raju et al. [99] were the first to isolate mollemycin A, a glyco-hexadepsipeptide-polyketide (Fig. 4) with a inhibitory effect against M. bovis BCG, with a MIC of 3.2 μM. Notably, it showed significantly reduced cytotoxicity against mammalian cell lines [136]. Beyond antimycobacterial activity, mollemycin A also exhibits strong antimalarial activity against both sensitive and multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains, combined with low toxicity in mammalian cells.

Wollamides. Wollamides are cyclic hexapeptides that have gained attention due to their promising in vitro antimycobacterial activity, particularly against M. bovis BCG (Fig. 5). Moreover, these substances exhibit no significant cytotoxicity in a mammalian cell panel, making them attractive candidates for the development of antimicrobial therapies, especially in the fight against TB [137].

Khalil et al. [100] isolated wollamide A and B, which demonstrated potential activity against M. bovis BCG. Wollamide A is a cyclic macro-lactam composed of a sequence of amino acids linked by peptide bonds, including units of glutamic acid and 2-amino-3-hydroxy-5-phenylpentanoic acid, with a lactam ring in its structure. On the other hand, amino acid composition in wollamide B reflects over their biological activity, leading to a slight reduction of antimycobacterial response, compared to wollamide A. The compounds exhibited MIC values of 2.8 μM and 3.1 μM, respectively.

Rollo et al. [138] investigated the interaction of these substances with first- and second-line TB antibiotics. As a result, they showed that wolamide B1 exhibited significant antimycobacterial activity and, when combined with these antibiotics, enhanced their efficacy against Mtb, including MDR and XDR strains. Furthermore, the compound did not interfere with the action of first-line antibiotics, suggesting it as a promising alternative for combination therapies in the fight against TB, particularly against resistant strains.

Ecumicin. Ecumicin (Fig. 5) consists of a macrolactam ring containing multiple amino acid residues, including N-methylated units and non-proteinogenic amino acids, as well as ester functional groups and hydrophobic side chains that enhance its interaction with cellular targets and contribute to its conformational stability and resistance to enzymatic degradation [139].

Ecumicin exhibits high potency against Mtb, acting through a mechanism distinct from that of traditional antibiotics. Studies have shown that its primary target is the GroEL/ES chaperonin complex, which is essential for proper protein folding, leading to effective inhibition of bacterial growth [140]. Of importance, an ecumicin analogue demonstrated in vitro intracellular activity in macrophage model of mycobacterial infections and maintained its activity for 28 days in time-kill tests, under different growth conditions [141]. Additionally, ecumicin displays a favorable toxicological profile, with low cytotoxicity in human cells, reinforcing its potential as a candidate for the development of new therapeutic agents against TB, including multidrug-resistant strains [139, 140]. The study conducted by Gao et al. [101] observed a MIC of 0.16 μM. This substance acts by inhibiting the ClpC1/ClpP1/ClpP2 proteolytic complex, which is essential for the degradation of damaged proteins in Mtb. It binds to the N-terminal domain of the ClpC1 protein and blocks its function in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, it strongly stimulates the ATPase activity of ClpC1, accelerating ATP hydrolysis and disrupting the bacterium's energy balance [142].

Complementing these findings, Hawkins et al. [143] reported the first total synthesis of ecumicin, using an efficient convergent route to construct the highly functionalized peptide core of the molecule. The synthetic ecumicin was subjected to antimicrobial assays and retained significant activity against Mtb H37Rv, with a MIC₉₀ of 312 nM. This result confirms that the potent activity observed in natural products could be achieved by inspiring chemical synthesis.

Lassomycin. Belonging to the class of lasso peptides, it stands out as a ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified natural product (RiPP) [144] (Fig. 5), featuring a unique structure resembling a sliding knot that provides high stability and various pharmacological activities, especially a significant antitubercular activity [145]. The selectivity of its action occurs because lassomycin targets the ClpC1 ATPase, a vital enzyme in mycobacteria that plays an essential role in protein degradation in conjunction with the proteolytic complex ClpP1P2 [146].

Gavrish et al. [102] isolated lassomycin from Lentzea kentuckyensis that showed a MIC of 0.41 μM against Mtb H37Rv. Additionally, lassomycin demonstrated resistance to serum proteases and did not significantly bind to plasma proteins, indicating favorable pharmacokinetic properties and metabolic stability. The substance also did not cause hemolysis and exhibited low cytotoxicity (IC50 ~ 350 μg/mL) in human cells. Moreover, lassomycin exhibited excellent bactericidal activity against Mtb in the exponential growth phase, with potency comparable to rifampicin. In Mtb cells in the stationary phase, lassomycin was more effective than rifampicin, without the presence of surviving persistent cells. Its efficacy against dormant forms and resistant strains, combined with its innovative mechanism of action, positions it as a promising candidate for the development of new treatments for the disease.

Svetamycins. Svetamycins are cyclic depsipeptides, a class of natural metabolites characterized by the simultaneous presence of peptide and ester bonds within a macrocyclic framework. Chemically, these molecules incorporate non-proteinogenic amino acid residues and unusual units such as piperazic acid and halogenated aromatic groups, which contribute to their structural complexity and biological activity. Their macrocyclic architecture and lipophilic side chains suggest favorable interactions with cellular membranes or protein targets essential for microbial viability [103].

In the study conducted by Dardic et al. [103], svetamycins A, C, and G (Fig. 5) were evaluated for their antimycobacterial activity against Mtb H37Rv and M. smegmatis. Against M. smegmatis, svetamycin G demonstrated the highest potency (2.84 μM), while svetamycin C (12.14 μM) was approximately four times more active than svetamycin A (50.71 μM). The authors concluded that methylation at the δ-position of the piperazic acid unit enhances antimycobacterial activity and that replacing a chlorine atom with bromine, as seen in svetamycin G, also has a beneficial effect on antimicrobial potency.

These SAR data highlight the potential of the svetamycin scaffold as a platform for chemical optimization. The high activity of svetamycin G suggests that modifications in halogenation patterns may be an effective strategy to enhance antimycobacterial efficacy [147].

Pyridomycins. Pyridomycin is a cyclodepsipeptide produced by Streptomyces pyridomyceticus NRRL B-2517 [148]. It features a 12-membered central ring composed of two pyridyl groups, a propionic acid, and a structurally unique 2-hydroxy-3-methylpent-2-enoic acid [149]. This metabolite present a notable antimycobacterial activity, recognized for their selective action on the enoyl reductase (InhA) enzyme [150]. Their efficacy is directly related to the presence of pyridyl moieties in their structure, which play a crucial role by interacting with the reduced form of NADH cofactor binding site, thereby blocking the biosynthesis of mycolic acids, essential components for the integrity of the mycobacterial cell wall [151].

In the study by Hartkoorn et al. [104] pyridomycin (Fig. 5) demonstrated activity against all tested Mycobacterium species, notably Mtb H37Rv, M. bovis BCG, and M. smegmatis, with MIC values of 0.72 μM, 0.72 μM, and 1.44 μM, respectively. No effects were observed against other evaluated bacteria, leading the authors to conclude that pyridomycin acts on a specific mycobacterial target. Additionally, cytotoxicity assays revealed higher selectivity of the compound for Mtb compared to the human cell lines, reinforcing its potential as a lead compound for the development of new antitubercular drugs.

Thiolopyrrolone A and thiolutin. Both compounds are natural metabolites belonging to the dithiolopyrrolone class, structurally distinct compounds that exhibit a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity [107]. Most analogs within this class possess a bicyclic pyrrolinone-dithiol core, with structural variations primarily at the N-4 and N-7 substituent positions. Thiolopyrrolone A represents the first identified member featuring a macrocyclic skeleton, structurally distinguishing it from other compounds in the class [107] (Fig. 5).

Thiolutin is a potent RNA polymerase inhibitor in both bacteria and fungi. It is characterized as a bicyclic antibiotic, defined by a disulfide bond between two ene-thiol units [152, 153]. This compound affects multiple cellular pathways, including glucose metabolism, Tor signaling, mRNA degradation, oxidative stress response, proteasome activity, and Hog/MAPK pathway signaling [154].

In the study by Song et al. [107], thiolopyrrolone A and thiolutin inhibited the virulent strain of Mtb, with MIC values of 2.74 μM and 0.5 μM, respectively. Dithiolopyrrolones are known for their broad-spectrum antibacterial effects and notable antiangiogenic activity, making them biologically promising compounds. However, their clinical application has not yet been realized due to their toxicity, which limits their therapeutic advancement [155].

Taeanamides. Taenamides constitute a class of nonribosomal lipopeptides. In the study conducted by Cui et al. [106] taeanamide A and taeanamide B were isolated from a Streptomyces sp. AMD43 (Fig. 5). Both substances exhibit a peptide structure associated with an unusual lipid chain. Taeanamide B displays a structure highly similar to that of taeanamide A, differing by the presence of an additional methoxy group, which represents a subtle yet significant structural variation between the two compounds.

When evaluated for antimycobacterial activity against Mtb mc2 6230, taeanamide A and B showed MIC values of 27.0 and 63.0 μM, respectively. Subsequently, their cytotoxicities were tested against various human cancer cell lines. Taeanamide A did not demonstrate significant cytotoxic activity (IC₅₀ > 20 μM), whereas taeanamide B exhibited strong inhibition of several cancer cell lines, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.26 to 1.13 μM. These results highlight that the structural difference between taeanamides A and B, particularly the presence of the methoxy group in the linear form of taeanamide B, is directly associated with its higher cytotoxic activity compared to the cyclized form of taeanamide A.

Therefore, although the compounds analyzed here present antimicrobial activity classified as weak according to conventional parameters, their NRPS origin gives them great strategic value. They are highly diversifiable molecules that can be converted into promising clinical prototypes through modern techniques of medicinal chemistry, functional genomics and molecular modeling. Such perspectives reinforce the importance of the continuous prospecting of natural products originating from extreme environments that act as reservoirs of actinobacteria producing bioactive metabolites with emerging applications in antimycobacterial pharmacotherapy.

5.3.2 PKS-derived pathway antimycobacterial metabolites

The polyketide synthase (PKS) pathway is responsible for the production of secondary metabolites with high bioactive potential [156]. This pathway is capable of constructing polyketides through the sequential condensation and modification of acyl building blocks, thus generating a heterogeneous group of compounds, such as polyethers, polyenes, polyphenols, macrolides and enediynes [157]. These PKS have a specific enzymatic domain structure, in which acyl transferase, ketosynthase, and an acyl transport protein form the central structure for condensation of acyl units, being structures considered essential for PKS [158, 159]. The Table 2 presents PKS metabolites isolated from different Actinomycetota species, along with their respective MIC values against mycobacterial strains.

Niphimycins. Niphimycins are macrolide antibiotics characterized by the presence of an alkylguanidyl side chain and are recognized for their ability to disrupt cellular membranes [191] (Fig. 6). Hu et al. [160] isolated niphimycin C and niphimycin Iα from Streptomyces sp. IMB7-145. Both compounds share a macrolactone core and differ in the position of the malonyl group. In niphimycin C is esterified to a hydroxyl, whereas in niphimycin Iα, it is linked to the amino group of the guanidyl side chain. Despite this structural difference, both compounds exhibited identical MIC of 3.5 μM against Mtb H37Rv, indicating that the position of the malonyl substituent did not significantly influence their antimycobacterial activity.

Mimosamycins. Mimosamycin is a natural compound with antimycobacterial activity, originally isolated by Mikami et al. [161]. Subsequently, Kesteleyn and De Kimpe [192] characterized mimosamycin as the first member of a new class of natural antibiotics known as 3,5,8(2H)-isoquinolinetriones (Fig. 6). In the study by Mikami et al. [161], mimosamycin was evaluated against several mycobacterial strains with MIC values ranging from 6.69 μM to > 100 μM, depending of species tested (Table 2), identifing mimosamycin as a novel antibiotic with specific activity against mycobacteria.

Lincolnemins. Lincolnemycins are aromatic antibiotics characterized by a polycyclic benzophenanthrene-type system with functional groups such as hydroxyls, ketones, and, in some cases, conjugated sugars (Fig. 6) [193]. These compounds exhibit significant antimicrobial activity, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria such as MRSA and Bacillus subtilis [194]. Their mechanism of action is generally attributed to DNA intercalation, inhibiting processes such as replication and transcription.

In the study conducted by Mohamed et al. [162], Lincolnemins A, B, and C were evaluated for their antimycobacterial activity against Mtb H37Ra. The difference between lincolnemins A, B, and C lies in their stereochemical variations, resulting in different isomers (Fig. 6). These three compounds exhibited MIC of 0.9 μM, 30 μM, and 16.2 μM, respectively. Furthermore, this study highlighted that these compounds possess significant bactericidal activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA, suggesting their great potential in combating infections caused by resistant strains, a growing therapeutic challenge in the treatment of both hospital and community-acquired infections. Although cytotoxicity remains a challenge, the presence of multiple functional sites in lincolnemycins allows structural modification to improve their pharmacological profile. The study of their biosynthetic clusters and rational derivatization strategies make these molecules promising candidates for the development of new antibiotics and antitumor agents [193].

Dinactin. Dinactin (Fig. 6) is an antibiotic of the macrotetrolide family, known for its wide range of biological activities, especially its antimicrobial [195199]. In the studies of Hussain et al. [163], dinactin inhibited a virulent strain of Mtb with an MIC of 1.31 μM. The mechanism of antimycobacterial activity of dinactin consists in damaging bacteria cell membranes, resulting in the extravasation of intracellular content [198].

Aranciamycins. Belonging to the anthracycline class, these compounds were described by Khalil et al. [164] as relatively rare microbial metabolites, distinguish themselves from other well-known anthracycline antibiotics, such as doxorubicin and daunorubicin by the absence of an amino group in their sugar fraction (Fig. 6). Four aranciamycins (I, J, A and aranciamycin) were evaluated for their antimycobacterial activity against M. bovis BCG, exhibiting MIC of 10 μM, 10 μM, 30 μM, and 30 μM, respectively [164]. The four substances share the basic structure of anthracyclines, characterized by an aromatic ring core with specific functional groups.

Based on these results, the authors concluded that the four compounds demonstrated moderate to weak antimicrobial activity. Additionally, the researchers conducted cytotoxicity tests on these compounds and observed that aranciamycin I and J exhibited in vitro cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines. Therefore, these metabolites could serve as promising leads for developing next generation antimycobacterial agents.

Elaiophylin and related compounds. Elaiophylin, a macrolide composed of a 16-membered ring with symmetric glycosylation at position C2 [200, 201] (Fig. 6). Is recognized for its broad range of pharmacological activities, including antibacterial, antifungal, and immunosuppressive effects [202204]. Elaiophylin was later identified in various Streptomyces species, accompanied by eighteen structurally similar analogs, among which 11,11'-O-dimethylelaiophylin and efomycin G stand out, showing variations in the functional groups at positions C-2/C-2', C-11/C-11', and C-14/C-14', while maintaining conservation in the diolide core, hemicetal fractions, and 6-deoxyfucose [205]. This substance exhibits significant antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including pathogenic microorganisms with drug resistance, such as MRSA and VRE. However, although the mechanism responsible for its antibacterial activity is not yet fully elucidated, it is presumed to be related to elaiophylin's ability to form selective cationic ion channels, in a stable and long-lasting manner, in lipid bilayer membranes [205].

Supong et al. [165] reported that three substances exhibited activity against Mtb H37Ra, elaiophylin, 11,11'-O-dimethylelaiophylline, and efomycin G, with MIC of 0.76 μM, 2.97 μM, and 11.87 μM, respectively. The antimicrobial activity of the analyzed compounds is intrinsically related to the presence of hydroxyl groups at positions C-11 and C-11' in the molecular structure. These groups are essential for the formation of hemiacetals, playing a fundamental role in the interaction of the molecule with bacterial targets, determining its efficacy against bacteria. When structural modifications occur, such as by substituting the hydroxyl groups, the molecule's ability to act as an antibiotic is significantly compromised, as such alterations reduce its capacity to interact efficiently with cellular targets [206].

Boromycin. Boromycin (Fig. 6) is a macrolide antibiotic agent that exhibits strong action against certain viruses, Gram-positive bacteria and parasitic protozoa [166, 207209]. This molecule contains boron in the lipophilic macrocycline lactone ring, thus becoming the first known antibiotic with this characteristic. Its antibacterial activity is attributed to its ionophoric action, resulting in the loss of bacterial membrane potential [209]. It was observed that this compound is ineffective against Gram-negative bacteria where the outer membrane appears to block the access of the compound to the cytoplasmic membrane [166].

In the study by Moreira, Aziz and Dick [166] boromycin demonstrated a MIC of 0.08 μM against Mtb H37Rv, evidencing potent antimycobacterial activity. The researchers also evaluated the bactericidal activity, and boromicin demonstrated identical MIC90, MBC99 and WCC99 values of 0.2 μM, both for replicating and non-replicating Mtb bacilli. This implies that boromicin is capable of eradicating not only aerobic growing bacilli cultures but also non-proliferating hypoxic cultures, highlighting its broad action.

To evaluate the selectivity index of boromicin, the researchers performed cytotoxicity analysis against HepG2 and Vero cells. The IC50 values obtained were 35.25, and 40 μM, respectively, indicating that boromicin has high selectivity for mycobacterial membranes, with a promising selectivity index, emphasizing its ability to preferentially affect mycobacterial cells compared to host cells. Moreover, to determine the frequency of spontaneous mutations conferring resistance to boromycin, cultures of BCG were exposed to prolonged incubation time with the metabolite. No resistant colonies were observed, demonstrating that the frequency of spontaneous mutations of BCG bacilli resistant to boromicin is very low. In contrast, selection with isoniazid produced resistant strains with a frequency ten times superior, highlighting the effectiveness of boromicin in preventing the development of spontaneous resistance. Thus, boromicin appears to be a highly effective antibiotic, exhibiting a high selectivity index and an extremely low risk of inducing bacterial resistance. These attributes suggest its great potential as an antimicrobial agent in the treatment of TB.

Lobophorins. Lobophorins belong to class Ⅱ spirotetronates, a group of polyketides with complex chemical structures, which comprise more than 70 compounds. These structures have stood out for their expressive biological potential [210, 211].

In the study by Lin et al. [167], four lobophorins (I, F, B, C) (Fig. 7) were tested against Mtb H37Ra, exhibiting moderate MIC values of 2.6 μM, 7.8 μM, 1.3 μM, and 1.4 μM, respectively. In order to evaluate the potential of lobophorins for TB treatment, the authors also assessed the cytotoxic potential of these compounds against the CEM-TART lymphoblastoid cell line. Infortunately, all antimycobacterial active compounds also exhibited strong cytotoxicity.

The authors observed several relevant relationships between chemical structure and biological activity, providing valuable insights for the development of antimycobacterial agents with improved selectivity. The removal of one digitoxose unit, as seen in lobophorin F, resulted in a cytotoxic selectivity greater than 25-fold for human cells compared to Mtb. In contrast, lobophorins B and C demonstrated similar potency toward both cell types, indicating low selectivity. Lobophorin I, however, which contains an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde group, exhibited a more favorable selectivity profile, showing over three times greater activity against Mtb than against human cells. This finding underscores the potential of simple structural modifications in the lobophorin scaffold to generate derivatives with more selective antimicrobial properties.

In the study by Chen et al. [168] three loboforins G, A and B were tested against M. bovis BCG and Mtb H37Rv. Against M. bovis BCG, the three compounds showed MIC of 1.3 μM, 1.35 μM, and 0.65 μM, respectively. When tested against Mtb H37Rv, the MIC were 26.7 μM, 27.7 μM, and 13.5 μM, respectively. Based on the results obtained, the authors observed that the nitro-sugar moiety plays a fundamental role in enhancing the antimycobacterial activity of lobophorin B, while the modification by acetylation of the hydroxyl group at C-32 in lobophorin G did not result in a significant improvement in activity when compared to lobophorin A. Therefore, these data, together with the biosynthesis studies of lobophorins, indicate the potential for the targeted development of new analogues with optimized bioactivities.

Steffimycins. Steffimycin is classified as an atypical anthracycline. This compound exhibits unique structural features that distinguish it from other members of this class, including the presence of a ketone group at C-10, two methoxy groups at C-2 and C-8, absent in compounds such as nogalamycin, aclacinomycin, and daunorubicin, and a neutral deoxy sugar at C-7, replacing the amino sugar commonly found in other anthracyclines [212214] (Fig. 7).

In the study by Trenado-Uribe et al. [169], steffimycin B was tested against Mtb H37Rv, H37Ra, and RR Mtb, showing MIC values of 13.2 μM, 0.01 μM, and 6.6 μM, respectively. In the study by Koyama et al. [170], steffimycin, 10-dihydrosteffimycin, and 8-demethoxysteffimycin were evaluated against M. bovis BCG, M. avium complex, M. intracellulare, and M. smegmatis. Steffimycin showed MIC values of 1.4 μM, 2.7 μM, 0.7 μM, and 2.7 μM, respectively; 10-dihydrosteffimycin exhibited MIC of 21.7 μM, 5.4 μM, 1.4 μM, and 5.4 μM; and 8-demethoxysteffimycin demonstrated MIC of 5.8 μM, 11.5 μM, 0.7 μM, and 5.8 μM. These results indicate moderate antimicrobial activity, with variations suggesting that modifications at C-8 and C-10 significantly influence antimicrobial potency. The compounds also demonstrated moderate cytotoxicity in HeLa cells, with IC₅₀ values of 47.2, 68.4, and 57.0 µg/mL, respectively. Analysis of selectivity based on cytotoxicity and antimycobacterial activity against M. intracellulare revealed favorable selectivity ranging from 87.7 to 146.2-fold, surpassing the structurally related daunorubicin, which exhibited higher cytotoxicity and lower selectivity.

In the study by Itaraudom et al. [171], steffimycins C and B were tested against Mtb H37Ra, with MIC values of 0.32 μM and 0.0052 μM, respectively, demonstrating high potency against this strain. The authors also evaluated the cytotoxicity of the compounds and observed relatively low toxicity toward both cancerous and non-cancerous mammalian cells, indicating a potentially favorable safety profile.

Treponemycin. Treponemycin is an 18-membered polyketide macrolide antibiotic produced by Streptomyces species, exhibiting potent activity against a wide range of bacterial pathogens (Fig. 7). Treponemycin shows antibacterial activity by acting as an inhibitor of threonyl-tRNA synthetase and features a nitrile moiety, a unique functionality in natural products [215217]. Moreover, the antibiotic demonstrated inhibitory activity against several species of pathogenic bacteria, especially Treponema hyodysenteriae, the causative agent of swine dysentery [218].

Treponemycin exhibited moderate activity against Mtb, with a MIC of 8.52 μM [172]. This activity likely occurs because treponemycin interferes with the enzyme threonyl-tRNA synthetase, which is essential for protein synthesis in cells.

Chrysomycin. Chrysomycin A is an antibiotic with antitumor properties recovered together with chrysomycin B, as part of a bioactive mixture [219]. Only in 1980 the molecules were separated and their chemical structures properly elucidated [220], and chrysomycin A was later associated with various biological activities [221] (Fig. 7).

Muralikrishnan et al. [173] evaluated the effect of chrysomycin A against Mtb H37Rv. The compound exhibited a MIC of 6.15 μM. However, its biosynthesis via Streptomyces fermentation results in low yields, and its mechanism of action is still not fully understood [222, 223].

Urdamycins. Belonging to the class of angucycline antibiotics, this category represents a growing group of secondary metabolites derived from microorganisms, particularly from the genus Streptomyces [224, 225]. These substances have a characteristic structure composed of a tetracyclic benzoanthracene core, which distinguishes them from anthracyclines. They exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activities and standing out especially for their antitumor potential, in addition to possessing antibacterial, antiviral properties, and enzyme inhibition activities [226] (Fig. 7).

In the study by Supong et al. [174], the compounds urdamycinone E, urdamycinone G, dehydroxyaquayamycin, and urdamycin E showed antimicrobial activity against Mtb with MIC values of 5.88 μM, 24.31 μM, 14.39 μM, and 14.03 μM, respectively. The structural differences influencing the MIC values are mainly related to the presence and position of hydroxyl groups on the anthraquinone ring, the pattern of C-glycosidic bonding, and specific substitutions on the aromatic rings, which alter the compounds interactions with biological targets, affecting the antitubercular activity. The authors also observed that these four substances exhibited cytotoxicity against cancerous cells and non-cancerous cells.

Kimidinomycin. Kimidinomycin is a 38-membered macrolide featuring an N-methylguanidyl group at the terminus of the side chain [175] (Fig. 7). Antimycobacterial activity evaluation demonstrated that the compound exhibited MIC values of 23.66 μM against M. bovis BCG, 11.83 μM against M. avium, 0.74 μM against M. intracellulare, and 11.83 μM against M. smegmatis. Macrolides are among the oldest and clinically effective antibiotics, targeting the bacterial ribosome by partially blocking the nascent peptide exit tunnel, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis [227].

Diazaquinomycins. Diazaquinomycins (DAQs) are secondary metabolites characterized by a 1,8-diazaanthraquinone core, which incorporates two nitrogen atoms into the traditional anthraquinone scaffold, imparting distinct redox properties and electronic characteristics [228]. Variants such as diazaquinomycins H and J are notable for their long lipophilic side chains terminating in an isopropyl group, a structural feature correlated with enhanced antimicrobial potency [228] (Fig. 7).

In the study conducted by Mullowney et al. [176], diazaquinomycins A, J, and H were evaluated against Mtb H37Rv. These compounds exhibited MIC of 0.28 μM (DAQ-A), 0.18 μM (DAQ-J), and 0.10 μM (DAQ-H). Remarkably, they also showed efficacy against MDR strains, while displaying minimal activity against other Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, indicating a selective antimicrobial spectrum [176].

Although DAQ exhibit excellent in vitro activity against Mtb, their clinical application remains limited, primarily due to poor aqueous solubility, which hinders formulation and evaluation in animal models [229]. Nevertheless, recent advances in the heterologous expression of DAQ biosynthetic gene clusters have enabled the production of structural analogues with potentially improved pharmacokinetic profiles [229].

Murayaquinone and other compounds. Murayaquinone is a derivative of naphthoquinone, a class of aromatic compounds characterized by a naphthalene ring bearing two ketone groups at quinonoid positions (Fig. 8). This quinone core imparts redox properties that enable the generation of ROS, which are often associated with antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects [230].

In the study conducted by Bunbamrung et al. [177], murayaquinone was isolated along with four other secondary metabolites: methyl aeruginoate, (R)-desferri-ferrithiocin methyl ester, desferri-ferrithiocin-4-hydroxyphenethyl ester, and furaquinocin D. Among the compounds tested, murayaquinone demonstrated the highest potency, with an MIC below 10 μM. However, it also exhibited significant cytotoxicity against both cancerous and non-cancerous human cell lines, indicating low selectivity for Mtb cells [177]. These findings suggest that murayaquinone holds therapeutic potential as a structural prototype for the development of new antitubercular agents [147, 231].

Other PKS-derived metabolites. Several compounds identified in this study showed antimicrobial activity against mycobacteria with MIC values greater than 10 µM, and were considered active, although with limited potency. These includes lincolnenins [162], methyl aerugionate and furaquinocin D [177], oxohygrolidine and methylabierixin [178], napyradiomycins [179], nibomycin [180], frenolicins [181], desertomycins [182, 183], panosialins [184], gwanacoside [185], phitsanoside [186], proximycin [187], dumulmycin [188], hydroxycapsimycin, brokamycin, igakuramycin and platensimycin [189, 190] (Figs. 8, 9). Despite the low activity observed in vitro, these compounds represent valuable PKS-derived scaffolds. This pathway confers a modular and highly diversifiable chemical architecture, which makes these molecules particularly attractive as starting points for rational structural optimization strategies. Through modern medicinal chemistry, it is possible to modify specific functional groups, such as side chains, aromatic systems, and polar regions, aiming to improve pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. These natural molecules hold great potential to be optimized into efficient prototypes against TB, contributing to the development of new therapeutic agents in the face of antimicrobial resistance pandemics [232234].

5.3.3 Nucleotide-, aminoglycoside-derived and other antimycobacterial metabolites

Structurally modified nucleosides produced by species of the genus Streptomyces exhibit broad applicability in both agricultural and pharmaceutical fields. They function as bioactive molecules whose efficacy and structural diversity stem from their nature as low molecular weight metabolites, which are generated through highly specialized biosynthetic pathways regulated by sophisticated enzymatic systems [235]. As an example, we can mention the puromycin, that causes premature chain termination during translation taking place in the ribosome [236].

On the other hand, aminoglycosides are a class of antibiotics characterized by amino sugar-modified structures, consisting of two or more amino sugars connected by glycosidic linkages to a central hexose ring [237]. Aminoglycosides are primarily obtained through fermentation of Streptomyces and Micromonospora species [238]. This antibiotic class inhibit protein synthesis by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, causing misreading of mRNA and protein misfolding [237]. Aminoglycosides have a gigantic importance in the history of TB treatment, since streptomycin was the first effective antibiotic. In addition, Streptomyces kanamyceticus yields kanamycin, which is used for the semi-synthesis of amikacin, which is still used for the treatment of resistant forms of TB.

Table 3 presents nucleotide, aminoglycoside and miscellaneous metabolites isolated from different Actinomycetota species, along with their respective MIC values against mycobacterial strains.

Mavintramycins. Mavitramycins These consisted of common cytosine, amosamine, and amicetose moieties and a diverse R moiety [239] (Fig. 10). In the study conducted by Hosoda et al. [239] mavintramycins A-G were evaluated for their antimycobacterial activity against strains of the M. avium complex, M. smegmatis, and M. bovis, demonstrating MIC ranging from 0.79 to 104.11 μM. Among them, mavintramycin A displayed the highest potency, with MIC of 0.81 μM and 1.62 μM against M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively.

In addition to mavintramycins, the authors isolated amicetin (Fig. 10), a nucleoside antibiotic of the aminohexopyranose class. This compound is part of a broader family that includes bamicetin, oxamicetin, SF2457, and cytimidine, all sharing structural motifs involving a modified hexose linked to a nitrogenous base [246]. Amicetin exhibited moderate to high antimycobacterial activity, with MIC values ranging from 0.63 to 5.04 μM against the tested strains.

Another compound identified was plicacetin (Fig. 10), a nucleoside antibiotic with previously documented activity against Mtb [247]. When tested under the same conditions, plicacetin showed consistent MIC of 6.03 μM, except for M. bovis, for which the MIC was 1.51 μM. When comparing the compounds, the authors observed that mavintramycin A was more potent than amicetin against M. avium and M. intracellulare. This suggests that the presence of a ρ-aminobenzoic acid group at the R position is not essential for biological activity, and that structural variations at this site strongly influence antimicrobial potential [239].

Mechanistic investigations revealed that mavintramycin A exerts its action by binding to the 23S ribosomal RNA, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis and secondarily impairing DNA replication. Based on these promising results, the authors advanced to in vivo infection models, demonstrating that the compound was effective both in M. smegmatis-infected silkworms and in a murine model of M. avium infection, significantly reducing bacterial loads in host tissues [239].

Taken together, the findings suggest that mavintramycin A possesses relevant therapeutic potential, especially for the treatment of TB and infections caused by M. avium complex. Its use in combination with conventional drugs could enhance antimicrobial efficacy and help combat drug-resistant strains.

Caprazamycins. Caprazamycins belong to the group of liponucleoside antibiotics [248]. Their molecular architecture is centered around the core of the compound (+)-caprazol, composed of 5'-glycyluridine, 5-amino-D-ribose, and a methylated diazepanone ring (Fig. 10). It inhibits the enzyme phospho-MurNAc-pentapeptide transferase, responsible for catalyzing the transfer of the phospho-MurNAc-pentapeptide from UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide to undecaprenyl phosphate (C55-P), a crucial step in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis [249].

Igarashi et al. [240] evaluated caprazamycin B against Mtb H37Rv, M. bovis, drug-susceptible Mtb and MDR Mtb, obtaining MIC values of 2.73 μM, 2.73 μM, 5.45 μM, and 5.45 μM, respectively. Moreover, the researchers reported that this compound did not exhibit significant toxic effects in mice or in genotoxicity and cytotoxicity assays, thus suggesting it as a promising candidate for the development of new anti-TB drugs.

Other metabolites. Streptothricin is one of the earliest antibiotics isolated from environmental bacteria, effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species. Structurally, it comprises a streptolidine lactam ring, the sugar gulosamine, and a β-lysine polymer varying from one to seven units [250] (Fig. 11). Its mechanism involves binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, inhibiting protein synthesis. Initially promising due to its broad-spectrum activity, streptothricin’s clinical use was limited by reversible nephrotoxicity observed in early trials [251]. Currently, research focuses on developing derivatives with improved safety profiles to address antibiotic resistance challenges. Thus, streptothricin remains an important scaffold for antibiotic development due to its unique mechanism and structural diversity [241, 250, 251]. Gan et al. [241] tested streptothricin E (Fig. 11) against Mtb H37Rv. This compound exhibited a MIC of 1.59 μM. However, in a preliminary clinical study, the use of this metabolite led to reversible renal toxicity, which halted its progress as a potential therapeutic agent [251].

Streptcytosine A, plicacetin, bamicetin, carbazamycin D, and pimprinine (Fig. 11) were evaluated against M. smegmatis. The compounds exhibited MIC of 50.74 μM, 61.82 μM, 26.46 μM, 87.61 μM, and 126.12 μM, respectively, with bamicetin standing out as approximately twice as active as the other tested compounds.

Kandenols are eudesmane-type sesquiterpenes (Fig. 11) that are common in plants and are involved in ecological defense. However, their occurrence in bacteria is considered extremely rare [243]. Ding et al. [243] isolated five new kandelons (A-E), representing the first known examples of eudesmane-type sesquiterpenes derived from a bacterial source. When tested against M. vaccae, the kandenols showed MIC of 43.96 μM-93.16 μM. Additionally, the compounds were evaluated for cytotoxicity against twelve human cancer cell lines and did not exhibit significant cytotoxic activity.

(2S,2″S)-6-lavandulyl-7,4'-dimethoxy-5,2'-dihydroxyflavanones, (2S,2″S)-6-lavandulyl-7-methoxy-5,2',4'-trihydroxyflavanones, and 6-prenyl-4'-methoxy-5,7-dihydroxyflavanones (Fig. 11), three lavandulylated flavonoids were evaluated for against Mtb H37Rv, exhibiting MIC of 106.15 μM, 13.69 μM, and 31.32 μM, respectively [244]. Additionally, cytotoxicity assays performed on human cells showed no significant toxic effects. 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol (Fig. 11) was identified by Kaari et al. [245] and tested against an MDR Mtb, exhibiting a MIC of 242.37 μM, as well as the standard Mtb H37Rv strain, with a MIC of 48.47 μM. The results underscore the potential of these compounds as a promisings candidates for the development of new drugs for future therapeutic applications against TB.

6 Conclusion remarks

Compared to other bacterial infectious diseases, treatment of TB represents a significant challenge due to the slow growth of Mtb and its ability to evade the host immune system, which prolongs therapy and hinders complete eradication of the pathogen. This scenario becomes even more complex with the emergence of MDR and XDR strains, which compromise the efficacy of current treatment regimens [5]. Beyond the direct impact on public health, antimicrobial resistance causes substantial economic losses, with projections indicating that, by 2050, drug-resistant TB could result in global losses of approximately 16.7 trillion dollars [62, 252].

Given this problem, there is an urgent need to develop new antitubercular drugs that act through mechanisms distinct from those currently available, with lower toxicity, higher selectivity, shorter, and safer therapeutic regimens. In this context, natural products emerge as a promising source of compounds with therapeutic potential due to their structural diversity and recognized biological activity [1, 253, 254].

In this review, 171 secondary metabolites produced by Actinomycetota species with antimycobacterial activity were analyzed, particularly against Mtb strains. Among the most potent compounds, with MIC in the submicromolar range, are the compounds steffimycin B (0.0052 μM), ilamycin J (0.0096 μM), nosiheptide (0.01 (0.03 μM)) actinomycins C2 and C3 (0.03 μM), rufomycin NBZ8 (0.030 μM), lassomycin (0.07 μM) and boromycin (0.08 μM). These compounds represent highly promising candidates for the development of new antitubercular drugs. Additionally, some of these substances also demonstrated activity against resistant Mtb strains, which is particularly relevant given the difficulty of treating MDR and XDR strains.

It is worth noting that natural metabolites derived from microorganisms play a crucial role in the discovery of new drug candidates, especially for diseases that still have large therapeutic gaps, such as TB. Recent studies have shown that biosynthetic gene clusters present in Actinobacteria encode a wide chemical diversity, and modern approaches such as genome mining, genomic mapping, and chemical dereplication have accelerated the discovery of new bioactive molecules, including those from underexplored niches such as marine environments and symbiotic associations [18, 19, 255].

Therefore, the data gathered in this review reinforce that Actinobacteria constitute a promising and still underexploited source of antimycobacterial compounds with clinical potential. Advances in understanding their mechanisms of action, combined with structural optimization and in-depth in vivo evaluations, may significantly contribute to the incorporation of new molecules into the therapeutic arsenal against TB, especially against resistant forms.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and Paraíba State Research Foundation (FAPESQ-PB) through PRONEX program (grant number #030/2023). In addition, this study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. The authors thank Alisson Macário and Rodrigo Molina for their critical comments on the manuscript.

Author contributions

S.P.C., L.L.C.A., S.P.F., and V.S.R.-J. contributed to the conceptualization and methodology. Formal analysis was performed by S.P.C. and V.S.R.-J. Data curation and visualization were conducted by L.L.C.A., S.P.F., G.D.O., M.S.S., and T.A.S. The original draft was written by S.P.C., L.L.C.A., S.P.F., and V.S.R.-J. Supervision was provided by S.P.C. and V.S.R.-J., and project administration was carried out by S.P.C.

Funding

None of the authors have any financial disclosures.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Informed consent

All authors have read the final manuscript and approved the submission.

References

  1. 1.
    Dong M, Pfeiffer B, Altmann KH. Recent developments in natural product-based drug discovery for tuberculosis. Drug Discov Today 2017;22(3): 585-91. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pham JV, Yilma MA, Feliz A, Majid MT, Maffetone N, Walker JR, et al. A review of the microbial production of bioactive natural products and biologics. Front Microbiol 2019;20(10): 1404. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fleming A. The discovery of penicillin. Br Med Bull 1944;2(1): 4-5. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maithani D, Sharma A, Gangola S, Chaudhary P, Bhatt P. Insights into applications and strategies for discovery of microbial bioactive metabolites. Microbiol Res 2022;261: 127053. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hussain A, Hassan QP, Shouche YS. New approaches for antituberculosis leads from Actinobacteria. Drug Discov Today 2020;25(12): 2335-42. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewin GR, Carlos C, Chevrette MG, Horn HA, McDonald BR, Stankey RJ, et al. Evolution and ecology of Actinobacteria and their bioenergy applications. Annu Rev Microbiol 2016;8(70): 235-54. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95(12): 6578-83. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jose PA, Maharshi A, Jha B. Actinobacteria in natural products research: progress and prospects. Microbiol Res 2021;246: 126708. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gaveau-Vaillant N, Jacquard C, Meier-Kolthoff JP, et al. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2015;80(1): 1-43. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salwan R, Sharma V. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of secondary metabolites in actinobacteria. Microbiol Res 2020;231: 126374. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Bergeijk DA, Terlouw BR, Medema MH, van Wezel GP. Ecology and genomics of Actinobacteria: new concepts for natural product discovery. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020;18(10): 546-58. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hui ML, Tan LT, Letchumanan V, He YW, Fang CM, Chan KG, et al. The extremophilic actinobacteria: from microbes to medicine. Antibiotics 2021;10(6): 682. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quinn GA, Banat AM, Abdelhameed AM, Banat IM. Streptomyces from traditional medicine: sources of new innovations in antibiotic discovery. J Med Microbiol 2020;69(8): 1040-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donald L, Pipite A, Subramani R, Owen J, Keyzers RA, Taufa T. Streptomyces: still the biggest producer of new natural secondary metabolites, a current perspective. Microbiol Res 2022;13(3): 418-65. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alam K, Mazumder A, Sikdar S, Zhao YM, Hao J, Song C, et al. Streptomyces: the biofactory of secondary metabolites. Front Microbiol 2022;29(13): 968053. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sivalingam P, Hong K, Pote J, Prabakar K. Extreme environment Streptomyces: potential sources for new antibacterial and anticancer drug leads. Int J Microbiol 2019;1(2019): 5283948. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khan S, Srivastava S, Karnwal A, Malik T. Streptomyces as a promising biological control agents for plant pathogens. Front Microbiol 2023;14(14): 1285543. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ventura M, Canchaya C, Tauch A, Chandra G, Fitzgerald GF, Chater KF, et al. Genomics of actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007;71(3): 495-548. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saleem M, Hassan A, Li F, Lu Q, Ponomareva LV, Parkin S, et al. Bioprospecting of desert actinobacteria with special emphases on griseoviridin, mitomycin C and a new bacterial metabolite producing Streptomyces sp. PU-KB10-4. BMC Microbiol 2023;23(1): 69. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Del Carratore F, Hanko EK, Breitling R, Takano E. Biotechnological application of Streptomyces for the production of clinical drugs and other bioactive molecules. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2022;77: 102762. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guerrero-Garzón JF, Zehl M, Schneider O, Rückert C, Busche T, Kalinowski J, et al. Streptomyces spp. from the marine sponge Antho dichotoma: analyses of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters and some of their products. Front Microbiol 2020;11: 437. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patiño AD, Montoya-Giraldo M, Quintero M, López-Parra LL, Blandón LM, Gómez-León J. Dereplication of antimicrobial biosurfactants from marine bacteria using molecular networking. Sci Rep 2021;11(1): 16286. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sivakala KK, Gutiérrez-García K, Jose PA, Thinesh T, Anandham R, Barona-Gómez F, et al. Desert environments facilitate unique evolution of biosynthetic potential in Streptomyces. Molecules 2021;26(3): 588. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peng X, Zeng Z, Hassan S, Xue Y. The potential of marine natural products: recent advances in the discovery of anti-tuberculosis agents. Bioorg Chem 2024;151: 107699. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2024. Geneva: WHO; 2024. PubMed Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palanivel J, Sounderrajan V, Thangam T, Rao SS, Harshavardhan S, Parthasarathy K. Latent tuberculosis: challenges in diagnosis and treatment, perspectives, and the crucial role of biomarkers. Curr Microbiol 2023;80: 392. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alsayed SSR, Gunosewoyo H. Tuberculosis: pathogenesis, current treatment regimens and new drug targets. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(6): 5202. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li SJ, Li YF, Song WM, Zhang QY, Liu SQ, Xu TT, et al. Population aging and trends of pulmonary tuberculosis incidence in the elderly. BMC Infect Dis 2021;21(1): 302. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luies L, Preez I. The echo of pulmonary tuberculosis: mechanisms of clinical symptoms and other disease-induced systemic complications. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020;33(4): e00036-e120. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ehrt S, Schnappinger D, Rhee KY. Metabolic principles of persistence and pathogenicity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2018;16(8): 496-507. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barberis I, Bragazzi NL, Galluzzo L, Martini M. The history of tuberculosis: from the first historical records to the isolation of Koch’s bacillus. J Prev Med Hyg 2017;58(1): E9-12. PubMed Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Herzog H. History of tuberculosis. Respiration 1998;65(1): 5-15. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karakousis PC, Mooney G. Respiratory isolation for tuberculosis: a historical perspective. J Infect Dis 2025;231(1): 3-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Armocida E, Martini M. Tuberculosis: a timeless challenge for medicine. J Prev Med Hyg 2020;61(2): E143-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Migliori GB, Caminero Luna J, Kurhasani X, van den Boom M, Visca D, D’Ambrosio L, et al. History of prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of pulmonary sequelae of tuberculosis. Presse Med 2022;51(3): 104112. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cambau E, Drancourt M. Steps towards the discovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Robert Koch, 1882. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20(3): 196-201. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maiolini M, Gause S, Taylor J, Steakin T, Shipp G, Lamichhane P, et al. The war against tuberculosis: a review of natural compounds and their derivatives. Molecules 2020;25(13): 3011. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bendre AD, Peters PJ, Kumar J. Tuberculosis: past, present and future of the treatment and drug discovery research. Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov 2021;27(2): 100037. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chai Q, Zhang Y, Liu CH. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an adaptable pathogen associated with multiple human diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018;8: 158. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Forrellad MA, Klepp LI, Gioffré A, SabioyGarcía J, Morbidoni HR, de la Paz SM, et al. Virulence factors of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Virulence 2013;4(1): 3-66. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cho T, Khatchadourian C, Nguyen H, Dara Y, Jung S, Venketaraman V. A review of the BCG vaccine and other approaches toward tuberculosis eradication. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021;17(8): 2454-70. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ahmed A, Rakshit S, Adiga V, Dias M, Dwarkanath P, D’Souza G, et al. A century of BCG: impact on tuberculosis control and beyond. Immunol Rev 2021;301(1): 98-121. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen J, Gao L, Wu X, Fan Y, Liu M, Peng L, et al. BCG-induced trained immunity: history, mechanisms and potential applications. J Transl Med 2023;21(1): 106. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Singh S, Saavedra-Avila NA, Tiwari S, Porcelli SA. A century of BCG vaccination: Immune mechanisms, animal models, non-traditional routes and implications for COVID-19. Front Immunol 2022;26(13): 959656. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Daniel BD, Venkatesan M, Padmapriyadarsini C. Safety profile of BCG revaccination for COVID prevention among elderly individuals in India. Indian J Tuberc 2024;71(4): 380-2. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aaby P, Benn CS. Saving lives by training innate immunity with bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109(43): 17317-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Massabni AC, Bonini EH. Tuberculose: história e evolução dos tratamentos da doença. Rev Bras Multidiscip 2019;22(2): 6-34. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Waksman SA. Streptomycin: background, isolation, properties, and utilization. Science 1953;118(3062): 259-66. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fiolhais C. Uma Breve História da Tuberculose em Portugal. Rev Multidiscip 2022;4(2): 41-55. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cohen KA, Stott KE, Munsamy V, Manson AL, Earl AM, Pym AS. Evidence for expanding the role of streptomycin in the management of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020;64(9): e00860-e920. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bertolli Filho C. História social da tuberculose e do tuberculoso: 1900–1950. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2001. p. 248. PubMed Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Keshavjee S, Farmer PE. Tuberculosis, drug resistance, and the history of modern medicine. N Engl J Med 2012;367(10): 931-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Murray JF, Schraufnagel DE, Hopewell PC. Treatment of tuberculosis. A historical perspective. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12(12): 1749-59. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sensi P. History of the development of rifampin. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5(3): 402-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hardie KR, Fenn SJ. JMM profile: rifampicin: a broad-spectrum antibiotic. J Med Microbiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001566. PubMed Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Grobbelaar M, Louw GE, Sampson SL, van Helden PD, Donald PR, Warren RM. Evolution of rifampicin treatment for tuberculosis. Infect Genet Evol 2019;74: 103937. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ogawa H, Itō T. Chemistry of Kanamycin. I Degradation Products of Kanamycin. J Antibiot 1957;10(6): 267. PubMed Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Koseki Y, Okamoto S. Studies on cross-resistance between capreomycin and certain other anti-mycobacterial agents. Jpn J Med Sci Biol 1963;16(1): 31-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hidy PH, Hodge EB, Young VV, Harned RL, Brewer GA, Phillips WF, et al. Structure and reactions of cycloserine. J Am Chem Soc 1955;77(8): 2345-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Deshpande D, Alffenaar JC, Köser CU, Dheda K, Chapagain ML, Simbar N, et al. d-Cycloserine pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, susceptibility, and dosing implications in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a Faustian deal. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67(supply_3): S308-16. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Goossens SN, Sampson SL, Van Rie A. Mechanisms of drug-induced tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020;34(1): e00141-e220. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dheda K, Mirzayev F, Cirillo DM, Udwadia Z, Dooley KE, Chang KC, et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2024;10(1): 22. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Dheda K, Gumbo T, Maartens G, Dooley KE, McNerney R, Murray M, et al. The epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis. Lancet Respir Med 2017;5(4): 291-360. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Khawbung JL, Nath D, Chakraborty S. Drug resistant tuberculosis: a review. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;74: 101574. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Menzies NA, Allwood BW, Dean AS, Dodd PJ, Houben RMGJ, James LP, et al. Global burden of disease due to rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a mathematical modeling analysis. Nat Commun 2023;14(1): 6182. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cazzaniga G, Mori M, Chiarelli LR, Gelain A, Meneghetti F, Villa S. Natural products against key Mycobacterium tuberculosis enzymatic targets: emerging opportunities for drug discovery. Eur J Med Chem 2021;15(224): 113732. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bhagwat A, Deshpande A, Parish T. How Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance has shaped anti-tubercular drug discovery. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022;12: 974101. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Perianes-Rodriguez A, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. Constructing bibliometric networks: a comparison between full and fractional counting. J Informetr 2016;10(4): 1178-95. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Leite LR, Pereira NG, Santos GA, Versiani MS, Xavier MA, Cardoso L, et al. Estudo prospectivo de patentes relacionadas à utilização de Streptomyces spp. em bioprocessos para produção de antimicrobianos, antineoplásicos e antiparasitários. Braz J Dev 2020;6(11): 88042-56. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ribeiro R. Domínio chinês em 37 das 44 tecnologias críticas: Diplomacia científica e política industrial. Relações Exteriores. 2024. https://relacoesexteriores.com.br/dominio-chines-em-37-das-44-tecnologias-criticas-diplomacia-cientifica-e-politica-industrial/ (Accessed 2025 May 15). PubMed Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Laskaris P, Karagouni AD. Streptomyces, Greek habitats and novel pharmaceuticals: a promising challenge. Microbiol Res 2021;12(4): 840-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Li S, Dong L, Lian W-H, Lin Z-L, Lu C-Y, Xu L, et al. Exploring untapped potential of Streptomyces spp. in Gurbantunggut Desert by use of highly selective culture strategy. Sci Total Environ 2021;790: 148235. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    De la Hoz-Romo MC, Díaz L, Villamil L. Marine actinobacteria a new source of antibacterial metabolites to treat acne vulgaris disease—a systematic literature review. Antibiotics 2022;11(7): 965. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chakraborty B, Kumar RS, Almansour AI, Gunasekaran P, Nayaka S. Bioprospection and secondary metabolites profiling of marine Streptomyces levis strain KS46. Saudi J Biol Sci 2022;29(2): 667-79. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Liu Z, Sun W, Hu Z, Wang W, Zhang H. Marine Streptomyces-derived novel alkaloids discovered in the past decade. Mar Drugs 2024;22(1): 51. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Golinska P, Wypij M, Agarkar G, Rathod D, Dahm H, Rai M. Endophytic actinobacteria of medicinal plants: diversity and bioactivity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015;108(2): 267-89. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Gohain A, Sarma RK, Debnath R, Saikia J, Singh BP, Sarmah R, et al. Phylogenetic affiliation and antimicrobial effects of endophytic actinobacteria associated with medicinal plants: prevalence of polyketide synthase type Ⅱ in antimicrobial strains. Folia Microbiol 2019;64(4): 481-96. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Harir M, Bendif H, Bellahcene M, Fortas Z, Pogni R. Streptomyces secondary metabolites. In: Basic Biology and Applications of Actinobacteria. IntechOpen; 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79890. PubMed Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Agrawal S, Acharya D, Adholeya A, Barrow CJ, Deshmukh SK. Nonribosomal peptides from marine microbes and their antimicrobial and anticancer potential. Front Pharmacol 2017;8: 828. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Martínez-Núñez MA, Rodríguez-Escamilla Z. Mining the Yucatan coastal microbiome for the identification of non-ribosomal peptides synthetase (NRPS) genes. Toxins 2020;12(6): 349. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Grünewald J, Marahiel MA. Chemoenzymatic and template-directed synthesis of bioactive macrocyclic peptides. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006;70(1): 121-46. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Praveen V, Tripathi CKM. Studies on the production of actinomycin-D by Streptomyces griseoruber-a novel source. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009;49(4): 450-5. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Qureshi KA, Azam F, Fatmi MQ, Imtiaz M, Prajapati DK, Rai PK, et al. In vitro and in silico evaluations of actinomycin X2 and actinomycin D as potent anti-tuberculosis agents. PeerJ 2023;8(11): e14502. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Chen C, Song F, Wang Q, Abdel-Mageed WM, Guo H, Fu C, et al. A marine-derived Streptomyces sp. MS449 produces high yield of actinomycin X2 and actinomycin D with potent anti-tuberculosis activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012;95(4): 919-27. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Shah AM, Shakeel UR, Hussain A, Mushtaq S, Rather MA, Shah A, et al. Antimicrobial investigation of selected soil actinomycetes isolated from unexplored regions of Kashmir Himalayas. India Microb Pathog 2017;110: 93-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Rakhmawatie MD, Wibawa T, Lisdiyanti P, Pratiwi WR, Damayanti E. Potential secondary metabolite from Indonesian Actinobacteria (InaCC A758) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2021;24(8): 1058-68. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ozeki Y, Igarashi M, Doe M, Tamaru A, Kinoshita N, Ogura Y, et al. A new screen for tuberculosis drug candidates utilizing a luciferase-expressing recombinant Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. PLoS ONE 2015;10(11): e0141658. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Intaraudom C, Rachtawee P, Suvannakad R, Pittayakhajonwut P. Antimalarial and antituberculosis substances from Streptomyces sp. BCC26924. Tetrahedron 2011;67(40): 7593-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Chen C, Chen X, Ren B, Guo H, Abdel-Mageed WM, Liu X, et al. Characterization of Streptomyces sp. LS462 with high productivity of echinomycin, a potent antituberculosis and synergistic antifungal antibiotic. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2021;48(9–10): kuab079. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Zhou B, Shetye G, Yu Y, Santarsiero BD, Klein LL, Abad-Zapatero C, et al. Antimycobacterial rufomycin analogues from Streptomyces atratus strain MJM3502. J Nat Prod 2020;83(3): 657-67. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sun C, Liu Z, Zhu X, Fan Z, Huang X, Wu Q, et al. Antitubercular ilamycins from marine-derived Streptomyces atratus SCSIO ZH16 Δ ilaR. J Nat Prod 2020;83(5): 1646-57. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Izumi R, Noda T, Ando T, Take T, Nagata A. Studies on tuberactinomycin. 3. Isolation and characterization of two minor components, tuberactinomycin B and tuberactinomycin O. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1972;25(4): 201-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cai G, Napolitano JG, McAlpine JB, Wang Y, Jaki BU, Suh JW, et al. Hytramycins V and I, anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis hexapeptides from a Streptomyces hygroscopicus strain. J Nat Prod 2013;76(11): 2009-18. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Liu Q, Liu Z, Sun C, Shao M, Ma J, Wei X, et al. Discovery and biosynthesis of atrovimycin, an antitubercular and antifungal cyclodepsipeptide featuring vicinal-dihydroxylated cinnamic acyl chain. Org Lett 2019;21(8): 2634-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Kim TS, Shin YH, Lee HM, Kim JK, Choe JH, Jang JC, et al. Ohmyungsamycins promote antimicrobial responses through autophagy activation via AMP-activated protein kinase pathway. Sci Rep 2017;7(1): 3431. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Castillo UF, Strobel GA, Ford EJ, Hess WM, Porter H, Jensen JB, et al. Munumbicins, wide-spectrum antibiotics produced by Streptomyces NRRL 30562, endophytic on Kennedia nigriscans. Microbiology 2002;148(9): 2675-85. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sun C, Yang Z, Zhang C, Liu Z, He J, Liu Q, et al. Genome mining of Streptomyces atratus SCSIO ZH16: discovery of atratumycin and identification of its biosynthetic gene cluster. Org Lett 2019;21(5): 1453-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Hosoda K, Koyama N, Kanamoto A, Tomoda H. Discovery of nosiheptide, griseoviridin, and etamycin as potent anti-mycobacterial agents against Mycobacterium avium complex. Molecules 2019;24(8): 1495. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Raju R, Khalil ZG, Piggott AM, Blumenthal A, Gardiner DL, Skinner-Adams TS, et al. Mollemycin A: an antimalarial and antibacterial glyco-hexadepsipeptide-polyketide from an Australian marine-derived Streptomyces sp. (CMB-M0244). Org Lett 2014;16(6): 1716-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Khalil ZG, Salim AA, Lacey E, Blumenthal A, Capon RJ. Wollamides: antimycobacterial cyclic hexapeptides from an Australian soil Streptomyces. Org Lett 2014;16(19): 5120-3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Gao W, Kim JY, Anderson JR, Akopian T, Hong S, Jin YY, et al. The cyclic peptide ecumicin targeting ClpC1 is active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59(2): 880-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Gavrish E, Sit CS, Cao S, Kandror O, Spoering A, Peoples A, et al. Lassomycin, a ribosomally synthesized cyclic peptide, kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the ATP-dependent protease ClpC1P1P2. Chem Biol 2014;21(4): 509-18. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Dardic D, Lauro G, Bifulco G, Laboudie P, Sakhaii P, Bauer A, et al. Svetamycins A-G, unusual piperazic acid-containing peptides from Streptomyces sp. J Org Chem 2017;82(12): 6032-43. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Hartkoorn RC, Sala C, Neres J, Pojer F, Magnet S, Mukherjee R, et al. Towards a new tuberculosis drug: pyridomycin–nature’s isoniazid. EMBO Mol Med 2012;4(10): 1032-42. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Jiang L, Huang P, Ren B, Song Z, Zhu G, He W, et al. Antibacterial polyene-polyol macrolides and cyclic peptides from the marine-derived Streptomyces sp. MS110128. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2021;105(12): 4975-86. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Cui J, Kim E, Moon DH, Kim TH, Kang I, Lim Y, et al. Taeanamides A and B, nonribosomal lipo-decapeptides isolated from an intertidal-mudflat-derived Streptomyces sp. Mar Drugs 2022;20(6): 400. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Song F, Hu J, Zhang X, Xu W, Yang J, Li S, et al. Unique cyclized thiolopyrrolones from the marine-derived Streptomyces sp. BTBU20218885. Mar Drugs 2022;20(3): 214. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Waksman SA, Woodruff HB. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal substances produced by a soil actinomyces. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1940;45(2): 609-14. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Zhou W, Xie Z, Si R, Chen Z, Javeed A, Li J, et al. Actinomycin-X2-immobilized silk fibroin film with enhanced antimicrobial and wound healing activities. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(7): 6269. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Machushynets NV, Elsayed SS, Du C, Siegler MA, de la Cruz M, Genilloud O, et al. Discovery of actinomycin L, a new member of the actinomycin family of antibiotics. Sci Rep 2022;12(1): 2813. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Crnovčić I, Rückert C, Semsary S, Lang M, Kalinowski J, Keller U. Genetic interrelations in the actinomycin biosynthetic gene clusters of Streptomyces antibioticus IMRU 3720 and Streptomyces chrysomallus ATCC11523, producers of actinomycin X and actinomycin C. Adv Appl Bioinform Chem 2017;10: 29-46. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Ribeiro VCA, Santos AMS, Araújo LSF, Pessoa SS, Queiroz WJL. Screening of actinomycetes for anti-tuberculosis activity from Caatinga soil. Braz J Microbiol 2022;53: 101-10. PubMed Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Finocchiaro G. Actinomycin D: a new opening for an old drug. Neuro Oncol 2020;22(9): 1235-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Zhang Y, Liu Q, Wang Z, Dong W, Cao Y. Advances in biosynthesis and pharmacology of actinomycins. Front Microbiol 2023;14: 1120452. PubMed Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wilbanks B, Trinh CT. Comprehensive characterization of toxicity of fermentative metabolites on microbial growth. Biotechnol Biofuels 2017;10: 262. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Erlandson A, Gade P, Menikpurage IP, Kim CY, Mera PE. The UvrA-like protein Ecm16 requires ATPase activity to render resistance against echinomycin. Mol Microbiol 2022;117(6): 1434-46. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Gade P, Erlandson A, Ullah A, Chen X, Mathews Ⅱ, Mera PE, et al. Structural and functional analyses of the echinomycin resistance conferring protein Ecm16 from Streptomyces lasalocidi. Sci Rep 2023;13(1): 7980. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Foster BJ, Clagett-Carr K, Shoemaker DD, Suffness M, Plowman J, Trissel LA, et al. Echinomycin: the first bifunctional intercalating agent in clinical trials. Invest New Drugs 1985;3(4): 403-10. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Schultz AW, Oh DC, Carney JR, Williamson RT, Udwary DW, Jensen PR, et al. Biosynthesis and structures of cyclomarins and cyclomarazines, prenylated cyclic peptides of marine actinobacterial origin. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130(13): 4507-16. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Fei J, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Qiu M, Liu H, Li C, et al. Structural insights into cyclomarin analogues and their differential bioactivities. Front Microbiol 2024;15: 1204455. PubMed Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Fei F, Lun S, Saxena A, Raghavan M, DeRisi JL, Bishai WR, et al. Total syntheses of cyclomarin and metamarin natural products. Org Lett 2024;26(45): 9698-703. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Gettins PG, Olson ST. Inhibitory serpins. New insights into their folding, polymerization, regulation and clearance. Biochem J 2016;473(15): 2273-93. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Tseng A, Seet J, Phillips EJ. The evolution of three decades of antiretroviral therapy: challenges, triumphs and the promise of the future. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015;79(2): 182-94. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Taylor G, Cui H, Leodolter J, Giese C, Weber-Ban E. ClpC2 protects mycobacteria against a natural antibiotic targeting ClpC1-dependent protein degradation. Commun Biol 2023;6(1): 301. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Zhou B, Achanta PS, Shetye G, Chen SN, Lee H, Jin YY, et al. Rufomycins or ilamycins: naming clarifications and definitive structural assignments. J Nat Prod 2021;84(10): 2644-63. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Yang W, Sun J, et al. The Clp protease complex as a promising target for anti-tuberculosis drug development: insights from natural product inhibitors. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2021;61: 74-81. PubMed Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Laughlin ZT, Conn GL. Tuberactinomycin antibiotics: biosynthesis, anti-mycobacterial action, and mechanisms of resistance. Front Microbiol 2022;13: 961921. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Morse BK, Brown MS, Gagne JW, McArthur HA, McCormick EL, Murphy TK, et al. Production of tuberactinamine A by Streptomyces griseoverticillatus var. tuberacticus NRRL 3482 fed with (S)-2-aminoethyl-L-cysteine. J Antibiot 1997;50: 698-700. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Dirlam JP, Belton AM, Birsner NC, Brooks RR, Chang SP, Chandrasekaran RY, et al. Cyclic homopentapeptides 1. Analogs of tuberactinomycins and capreomycin with activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Pasteurella. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 1997;7(9): 1139-44. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Linde RG, Birsner NC, Chandrasekaran RY, Clancy J, Howe RJ, Lyssikatos JP, et al. Cyclic homopentapeptides 3. Synthetic modifications to the capreomycins and tuberactinomycins: compounds with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 1997;7(9): 1149-52. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Oelke AJ, France DJ, Hofmann T, Wuitschik G, Ley SV. Piperazic acid-containing natural products: isolation, biological relevance and total synthesis. Nat Prod Rep 2011;28(8): 1445-71. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Jeon SM, Kim YJ, Nguyen TQ, Cui J, Thi Bich Hanh B, Silwal P, et al. Ohmyungsamycin promotes M1-like inflammatory responses to enhance host defence against Mycobacteroides abscessus infections. Virulence 2022;13(1): 1966-84. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Benazet F, Cartier M, Florent JC, Godard C, Jung G, Lunel J, et al. Nosiheptide, a sulfur-containing peptide antibiotic isolated from Streptomyces actuosus 40037. Experientia 1980;36(4): 414-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Haste NM, Thienphrapa W, Tran DN, Loesgen S, Sun P, Nam SJ, et al. Activity of the thiopeptide antibiotic nosiheptide against contemporary strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antibiot 2012;65(12): 593-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Xie Y, Wang B, Liu J, Zhou J, Ma J, Huang H, Ju J. Identification of the biosynthetic gene cluster and regulatory cascade for the synergistic antibacterial antibiotics griseoviridin and viridogrisein in Streptomyces griseoviridis. ChemBioChem 2012;13(18): 2745-57. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Jin S, Chen H, Zhang J, Lin Z, Qu X, Jia X, et al. Analyzing and engineering of the biosynthetic pathway of mollemycin A for enhancing its production. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2024;9(3): 445-52. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Khalil ZG, Hill TA, De Leon Rodriguez LM, Lohman RJ, Hoang HN, Reiling N, Hillemann D, et al. Structure-activity relationships of wollamide cyclic hexapeptides with activity against drug-resistant and intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;63(3): e01773-18. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Rollo RF, Mori G, Hill TA, Hillemann D, Niemann S, Homolka S, et al. Wollamide cyclic hexapeptides synergize with established and new tuberculosis antibiotics in targeting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr 2023;11(4): e00465-e523. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Wolf NM, Lee H, Zagal D, Nam JW, Oh DC, Lee H, et al. Structure of the N-terminal domain of ClpC1 in complex with the antituberculosis natural product ecumicin reveals unique binding interactions. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2020;76(Pt 5): 458-71. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Schmitt EK, Riwanto M, Sambandamurthy V, Roggo S, Miault C, Zwingelstein C, et al. The natural product cyclomarin kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the ClpC1 subunit of the caseinolytic protease. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2011;50(26): 5889-91. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Stevens MT, Hawkins PME, Wang T, Payne RJ, Britton WJ. Analogue of the natural product ecumicin causes sustained growth inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis under multiple growth conditions. Tuberculosis 2025;151: 102594. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Hong J, Duc NM, Jeong BC, Cho S, Shetye G, Cao J, et al. Identification of the inhibitory mechanism of ecumicin and rufomycin 4–7 on the proteolytic activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpC1/ClpP1/ClpP2 complex. Tuberculosis 2023;138: 102298. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Hawkins PME, Giltrap AM, Nagalingam G, Britton WJ, Payne RJ. Total synthesis of Ecumicin. Org Lett 2018;20(4): 1019-22. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Wang S, Lin S, Fang Q, Gyampoh R, Lu Z, Gao Y, et al. A ribosomally synthesised and post-translationally modified peptide containing a β-enamino acid and a macrocyclic motif. Nat Commun 2022;13(1): 5044. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Zhu S, Su Y, Shams S, Feng Y, Tong Y, Zheng G. Lassomycin and lariatin lasso peptides as suitable antibiotics for combating mycobacterial infections: current state of biosynthesis and perspectives for production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;103(10): 3931-40. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Lear S, Munshi T, Hudson AS, Hatton C, Clardy J, Mosely JA, et al. Total chemical synthesis of lassomycin and lassomycin-amide. Org Biomol Chem 2016;14(19): 4534-41. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod 2020;83(3): 770-803. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Maeda K, Kosaka H, Okami Y, Umezawa H. A new antibiotic, pyridomycin. J Antibiot 1953;6(3): 140. PubMed Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Huang T, Zhou Z, Wei M, Chen L, Xiao Z, Deng Z, et al. Characterization of pyridomycin B reveals the formation of functional groups in antimycobacterial pyridomycin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022;88(6): e02035-e2121. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Hartkoorn RC, Pojer F, Read JA, Gingell H, Neres J, Horlacher OP, et al. Pyridomycin bridges the NADH- and substrate-binding pockets of the enoyl reductase InhA. Nat Chem Biol 2014;10(2): 96-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Zhou Z, Yang X, Huang T, Zheng J, Deng Z, Dai S, et al. Bifunctional NadC homologue PyrZ catalyzes nicotinic acid formation in pyridomycin biosynthesis. ACS Chem Biol 2023;18(Jan 20): 141-50. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Wang A, Ma X, Wei F, Li Y, Liu Q, Zhang H. Evidence on the therapeutic role of thiolutin in imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in mice. Immun Inflamm Dis 2023;11(7): e877. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Lauinger L, Li J, Shostak A, Cemel IA, Ha N, Zhang Y, et al. Thiolutin is a zinc chelator that inhibits the Rpn11 and other JAMM metalloproteases. Nat Chem Biol 2017;13(7): 709-14. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Qiu C, Arora P, Malik I, Laperuta AJ, Pavlovic EM, Ugochukwu S, et al. Thiolutin has complex effects in vivo but is a direct inhibitor of RNA polymerase Ⅱ in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 2024;52(5): 2546-64. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Li B, Wever WJ, Walsh CT, Bowers AA. Dithiolopyrrolones: biosynthesis, synthesis, and activity of a unique class of disulfide-containing antibiotics. Nat Prod Rep 2014;31(7): 905-23. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Tittes YU, Herbst DA, Martin SFX, Munoz-Hernandez H, Jakob RP, Maier T. The structure of a polyketide synthase bimodule core. Sci Adv 2022;8(38): eabo6918. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Hertweck C. The biosynthetic logic of polyketide diversity. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2009;48(26): 4688-716. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Kohli GS, John U, Van Dolah FM, Murray SA. Evolutionary distinctiveness of fatty acid and polyketide synthesis in eukaryotes. ISME J 2016;10(8): 1877-90. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Anestis K, Kohli GS, Wohlrab S, Varga E, Larsen TO, Hansen PJ, et al. Polyketide synthase genes and molecular trade-offs in the ichthyotoxic species Prymnesium parvum. Sci Total Environ 2021;795: 148878. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Hu Y, Wang M, Wu C, Tan Y, Li J, Hao X, et al. Identification and proposed relative and absolute configurations of niphimycins C-E from the marine-derived Streptomyces sp. IMB7-145 by genomic analysis. J Nat Prod 2018;81(1): 178-87. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Mikami Y, Yokoyama K, Omi A, Arai T. Identification of producer and biological activities of new antibiotics, mimosamycin and chlorocarcins. J Antibiot 1976;29(4): 408-14. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Mohamed OG, Khalil ZG, Salim AA, Cui H, Blumenthal A, Capon RJ. Lincolnenins A-D: isomeric bactericidal bianthracenes from Streptomyces lincolnensis. J Org Chem 2021;86(16): 11011-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Hussain A, Rather MA, Dar MS, Dangroo NA, Aga MA, Qayum A, et al. Streptomyces puniceus strain AS13., production, characterization and evaluation of bioactive metabolites: a new face of dinactin as an antitumor antibiotic. Microbiol Res 2018;207: 196-202. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Khalil ZG, Raju R, Piggott AM, Salim AA, Blumenthal A, Capon RJ. Aranciamycins I and J, antimycobacterial anthracyclines from an Australian marine-derived Streptomyces sp. J Nat Prod 2015;78(Apr 24): 949-52. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    Supong K, Sripreechasak P, Tanasupawat S, Danwisetkanjana K, Rachtawee P, Pittayakhajonwut P. Investigation on antimicrobial agents of the terrestrial Streptomyces sp. BCC71188. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;101(2): 533-43. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Moreira W, Aziz DB, Dick T. Boromycin kills mycobacterial persisters without detectable resistance. Front Microbiol 2016;7: 199. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Lin Z, Koch M, Pond CD, Mabeza G, Seronay RA, Concepcion GP, et al. Structure and activity of lobophorins from a turrid mollusk-associated Streptomyces sp. J Antibiot 2014;67(1): 121-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Chen C, Wang J, Guo H, Hou W, Yang N, Ren B, et al. Three antimycobacterial metabolites identified from a marine-derived Streptomyces sp. MS100061. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013;97(9): 3885-92. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Trenado-Uribe M, Silva-Miranda M, Rivero-Cruz JF, Rodríguez-Peña K, Espitia-Pinzón CI, Rodríguez-Sanoja R, et al. Antimycobacterial activity of an anthracycline produced by an endophyte isolated from Amphipterygium adstringens. Mol Biol Rep 2018;45(6): 2563-70. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    Koyama N, Shigeno S, Kanamoto A, Tomoda H. Steffimycin E, a new anti-mycobacterial agent against Mycobacterium avium complex, produced by Streptomyces sp. OPMA02852. J Antibiot 2020;73(8): 581-4. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    Intaraudom C, Bunbamrung N, Dramae A, Danwisetkanjana K, Rachtawee P, Pittayakhajonwut P. Antimalarial and antimycobacterial agents from Streptomyces sp. BCC27095. Tetrahedron Lett 2015;56(49): 6875-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  172. 172.
    Yassien MA, Abdallah HM, El-Halawany AM, Jiman-Fatani AA. Anti-tuberculous activity of treponemycin produced by a Streptomyces strain MS-6-6 isolated from Saudi Arabia. Molecules 2015;20(2): 2576-90. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    Muralikrishnan B, Dan VM, Vinodh JS, Jamsheena V, Ramachandran R, Thomas S, et al. Anti-microbial activity of chrysomycin A produced by Streptomyces sp. against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. RSC Adv 2017;7(58): 36335-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    Supong K, Thawai C, Suwanborirux K, Choowong W. Antimalarial and antitubercular C-glycosylated benz[α]anthraquinones from the marine-derived Streptomyces sp. BCC45596. Phytochem Lett 2012;5(3): 651-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    Hikima A, Asamizu S, Onaka H, Zhang H, Tomoda H, Koyama N. Kimidinomycin, a new antibiotic against Mycobacterium avium complex, produced by Streptomyces sp. KKTA-0263. J Antibiot 2022;75(2): 72-6. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Mullowney MW, Hwang CH, Newsome AG, Wei X, Tanouye U, Wan B, et al. Diaza-anthracene antibiotics from a freshwater-derived actinomycete with selective antibacterial activity toward Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ACS Infect Dis 2015;1(4): 168-74. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    Bunbamrung N, Intaraudom C, Dramae A, Thawai C, Tadtong S, Auncharoen P, et al. Antibacterial, antitubercular, antimalarial and cytotoxic substances from the endophytic Streptomyces sp. TBRC7642. Phytochemistry 2020;172: 112275. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    Supong K, Thawai C, Choowong W, Kittiwongwattana C, Thanaboripat D, Laosinwattana C, et al. Antimicrobial compounds from endophytic Streptomyces sp. BCC72023 isolated from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Res Microbiol 2016;167(4): 290-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    Carretero-Molina D, Ortiz-López FJ, Martín J, Oves-Costales D, Díaz C, de la Cruz M, et al. New napyradiomycin analogues from Streptomyces sp. strain CA-271078. Mar Drugs 2019;18(1): 22. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Arai M, Kamiya K, Pruksakorn P, Sumii Y, Kotoku N, Joubert JP, et al. Anti-dormant mycobacterial activity and target analysis of nybomycin produced by a marine-derived Streptomyces sp. Bioorg Med Chem 2015;23(13): 3534-41. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    Supong K, Bunbamrung N, Tanasupawat S, Auncharoen P, Nithithanasilp S, Rachtawee P, et al. Frenolicins H and I from the caterpillar-associated Streptomyces sp. TBRC17107. Nat Prod Res 2024;38(21): 3773-82. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    Braña AF, Sarmiento-Vizcaíno A, Pérez-Victoria I, Martín J, Otero L, Palacios-Gutiérrez JJ, et al. Desertomycin G, a new antibiotic with activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and human breast tumor cell lines produced by Streptomyces althioticus MSM3, isolated from the Cantabrian Sea intertidal macroalgae Ulva sp. Mar Drugs 2019;17(2): 114. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    Wang L, Reheman A, Wan C. Discovery of anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis desertomycins from Streptomyces flavofungini TRM90047 based on genome mining and HSQC-TOCSY. Sci Rep 2024;14(1): 17006. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Kwon YJ, Sohn MJ, Oh T, Cho SN, Kim CJ, Kim WG. Panosialins, inhibitors of enoyl-ACP reductase from Streptomyces sp. AN1761. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2013;23(2): 184-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Huynh TH, Lee J, Moon DH, Nguyen TQ, Son S, Hwang S, et al. Gwanakosides A and B, 6-deoxy-α-l-talopyranose-bearing aromatic metabolites from a Streptomyces sp. and coculture with Pandoraea sp. J Nat Prod 2022;85(1): 83-90. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  186. 186.
    Boonlarppradab C, Saepua S, Pruksatrakul T, Choowong W, Rachtawee P, Suriyachadkun C. Benzothioate Glycoside from a terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TBRC 11511 from Thailand. J Antibiot 2022;75(10): 583-8. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Huang P, Xie F, Ren B, Wang Q, Wang J, Wang Q, et al. Anti-MRSA and anti-TB metabolites from marine-derived Verrucosispora sp. MS100047. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;100(17): 7437-47. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    An JS, Shin B, Kim TH, Hwang S, Shin YH, Cui J, et al. Dumulmycin, an antitubercular bicyclic macrolide from a riverine sediment-derived Streptomyces sp. Org Lett 2021;23(9): 3359-63. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Shigeno S, Kadowaki M, Nagai K, Hosoda K, Terahara T, Nishimura T, et al. New polycyclic tetramate macrolactams with antimycobacterial activity produced by marine-derived Streptomyces sp. KKMA-0239. J Antibiot 2024;77(5): 265-71. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  190. 190.
    Brown AK, Taylor RC, Bhatt A, Fütterer K, Besra GS. Platensimycin activity against mycobacterial beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthases. PLoS ONE 2009;4(7): e6306. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    Kim HY, Kim JD, Hong JW, Ham JH, Kim BS. Identification of antifungal niphimycin from Streptomyces sp. KP6107 by screening based on adenylate kinase assay. J Basic Microbiol 2013;53(7): 581-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    Kesteleyn B, De Kimpe N. Synthesis of mimosamycin. J Org Chem 2000;65(3): 635-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    Li Y, Sun Y, Hong H. Genomic insights into lincolnemin biosynthesis in Streptomyces lincolnensis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;101(9): 3763-71. PubMed Google Scholar
  194. 194.
    Ogawa H, Fukuda D, Tanaka N. Isolation and structure of lincolnemin, a new aromatic antibiotic from Streptomyces sp. J Antibiot 2004;57(3): 158-62. PubMed Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    Jizba J, Sedmera P, Zima J, Beran M, Blumauerová M, Kandybin NV, et al. Macrotetrolide antibiotics produced by Streptomyces globisporus. Folia Microbiol 1991;36: 437-43. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    Rakotondraibe LH, Rasolomampianina R, Park HY, Li J, Slebodnik C, Brodie PJ, et al. Antiproliferative and antiplasmodial compounds from selected Streptomyces species. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2015;25(23): 5646-9. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  197. 197.
    Ortega HE, Ferreira LLG, Melo WGP, Oliveira ALL, Ramos Alvarenga RF, Lopes NP, et al. Antifungal compounds from Streptomyces associated with attine ants also inhibit Leishmania donovani. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019;13(8): e0007643. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Rawangkan A, Wongsirisin P, Pook-In G, Siriphap A, Yosboonruang A, Kiddee A, et al. Dinactin: a new antitumor antibiotic with cell cycle progression and cancer stemness inhibiting activities in lung cancer. Antibiotics 2022;11(12): 1845. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  199. 199.
    Zhang K, Gu L, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Li X. Dinactin from a new producer, Streptomyces badius gz-8, and its antifungal activity against the rubber anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Microbiol Res 2020;240: 126548. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  200. 200.
    Ji J, Wang K, Meng X, Zhong H, Li X, Zhao H, et al. Elaiophylin inhibits tumorigenesis of human lung adenocarcinoma by inhibiting mitophagy via suppression of SIRT1/Nrf2 signaling. Cancers 2022;14(23): 5812. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  201. 201.
    Arcamone FM, Bertazzoli C, Ghione M, Scotti T. Melanosporin and elaiophylin, new antibiotics from Streptomyces melanosporus (sive melonsporofaciens) n. sp. G Microbiol 1959;7: 207-16. PubMed Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    Sang-Yong L, Kim MS, Kim HS, Kim YH, Hong SD, Lee JJ. Structure determination and biological activities of elaiophylin produced by Streptomyces sp. MCY-846. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1996;6(4): 245-9. PubMed Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    Fang A, Wong GK, Demain AL. Enhancement of the antifungal activity of rapamycin by the coproduced elaiophylin and nigericin. J Antibiot 2000;53(2): 158-62. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    Sang-Yong L, Kim HS, Kim YH, Han SB, Kim HM, Hong SD, et al. Immunosuppressive activity of elaiophylins. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1997;7(4): 272-7. PubMed Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    Gui M, Zhang MX, Wu WH, Sun P. Natural occurrence, bioactivity and biosynthesis of elaiophylin analogues. Molecules 2019;24(21): 3840. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Gan M, Liu D, Yuan Z, Li U, Zhou X, Wang H, et al. Elaiophylin derivative and the application in antimicrobial agent and resistance M. tuberculosis infection thereof. CN103665071B. Instituto de Biotecnologia Medicinal da Academia Chinesa de Ciências Médicas e da Universidade Médica da União de Pequim; 2016. https://patents.google.com/patent/CN103665071B/en (Accessed 15 May 2025). PubMed Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    Dunitz JD, Hawley DM, Miklos D, White DN, Berlin Y, Marusić R, et al. Structure of boromycin. Helv Chim Acta 1971;54: 1709-13. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    Kohno J, Kawahata T, Otake T, Morimoto M, Mori H, Ueba N, et al. Boromycin, an anti-HIV antibiotic. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1996;60(6): 1036-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Abenoja J, Cotto-Rosario A, O’Connor R. Boromycin has potent anti-Toxoplasma and anti-Cryptosporidium activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021;65(4): e01278-e1320. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    Shi J, Peng D, Peng FF, Zhang QB, Duan YW, Huang Y. The isolation and structure elucidation of spirotetronate lobophorins A, B, and H8 from Streptomyces sp. CB09030 and their biosynthetic gene cluster. Molecules 2023;28(8): 3597. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  211. 211.
    Chen X, Du Y, Ma Y, Liu P, Chen Y. Antimicrobial lobophorins from endophytic strain Streptomyces sp. R6 obtained from Azadirachta indica. Molecules 2025;30(3): 586. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  212. 212.
    Keller-Schierlein W, Zähner H, Meyer W. Steffimycin, a new anthracycline antibiotic. Helv Chim Acta 1967;50: 1390-401. PubMed Google Scholar
  213. 213.
    Wang G, Chen J, Zhu H, Rohr J. One-pot enzymatic total synthesis of presteffimycinone, an early intermediate of the anthracycline antibiotic steffimycin biosynthesis. Org Lett 2017;19(3): 540-3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  214. 214.
    Gullón S, Olano C, Abdelfattah MS, Braña AF, Rohr J, Méndez C, et al. Isolation, characterization, and heterologous expression of the biosynthesis gene cluster for the antitumor anthracycline steffimycin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72(6): 4172-83. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  215. 215.
    Hütter R, Poralla K, Zachau HG, Zähner H. Metabolic products of microorganisms. 5l. On the mechanism of action of borrelidin—inhibition of the threonine incorporation in sRNA. Biochem Z 1966;344(2): 190-6. PubMed Google Scholar
  216. 216.
    Paetz W, Nass G. Biochemical and immunological characterization of threonyl-tRNA synthetase of two borrelidin-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Eur J Biochem 1973;35(2): 331-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  217. 217.
    Novoa EM, Camacho N, Tor A, Wilkinson B, Moss S, Marín-García P, et al. Analogs of natural aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors clear malaria in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111(51): E5508-17. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  218. 218.
    Singh SK, Gurusiddaiah S, Whalen JW. Treponemycin, a nitrile antibiotic active against Treponema hyodysenteriae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985;27(2): 239-45. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  219. 219.
    Strelitz F, Flon H, Asheshov IN. Chrysomycin: a new antibiotic substance for bacterial viruses. J Bacteriol 1955;69(3): 280-3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    Weiss U, Yoshihira K, Highet RJ, White RJ, Wei TT. The chemistry of the antibiotics chrysomycin A and B. Antitumor activity of chrysomycin A. J Antibiot 1982;35(9): 1194-201. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    Zhang J, Liu P, Chen J, Yao D, Liu Q, Zhang J, et al. Upgrade of chrysomycin A as a novel topoisomerase Ⅱ inhibitor to curb KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma progression. Pharmacol Res 2023;187: 106565. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  222. 222.
    Wu F, Zhang J, Song F, Wang S, Guo H, Wei Q, et al. Chrysomycin A derivatives for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis. ACS Cent Sci 2020;6(6): 928-38. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  223. 223.
    Muralikrishnan B, Edison LK, Dusthackeer A, Jijimole GR, Ramachandran R, Madhavan A, et al. Chrysomycin A inhibits the topoisomerase I of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antibiot 2022;75(4): 226-35. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  224. 224.
    Kharel MK, Pahari P, Shepherd MD, Tibrewal N, Nybo SE, Shaaban KA, Rohr J. Angucyclines: biosynthesis, mode-of-action, new natural products, and synthesis. Nat Prod Rep 2012;29(2): 264-325. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  225. 225.
    Vysloužilová D, Kováč O. The chemistry of angucyclines. ChemPlusChem 2024;89(10): e202400307. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  226. 226.
    Kirschning A, Chen GW, Dräger G, Schuberth I, Tietze LF. Syntheses and biological evaluation of new glyco-modified angucyclin-antibiotics. Bioorg Med Chem 2000;8(9): 2347-54. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  227. 227.
    Vázquez-Laslop N, Mankin AS. How macrolide antibiotics work. Trends Biochem Sci 2018;43(9): 668-84. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  228. 228.
    Prior AM, Sun D. Total synthesis of diazaquinomycins H and J using double Knorr cyclization in the presence of triisopropylsilane. RSC Adv 2019;9(4): 1759-71. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  229. 229.
    Braesel J, Tran TA, Eustáquio AS. Heterologous expression of the diazaquinomycin biosynthetic gene cluster. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;46(9–10): 1359-64. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    Babula P, Adam V, Kizek R, Sladký Z, Havel L. Naphthoquinones as allelochemical triggers of programmed cell death. Environ Exp Bot 2009;65(2–3): 330-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    Méndez C, Koskinen AMP, Salas JA. Antitubercular agents from actinomycetes: synthesis and medicinal chemistry. Curr Top Med Chem 2011;11(12): 1435-51. PubMed Google Scholar
  232. 232.
    Zhang MM, Wong FT, Wang Y, Luo S, Lim YH, Heng E, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 strategy for activation of silent Streptomyces biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat Chem Biol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2341. PubMed Google Scholar
  233. 233.
    Krieger IV, Yalamanchili S, Dickson P, Engelhart CA, Zimmerman MD, Wood J, et al. Inhibitors of the thioesterase activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pks13 discovered using DNA-encoded chemical library screening. ACS Infect Dis 2024;10(5): 1561-75. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  234. 234.
    Obadawo BS, Bartolomeu Halicki PC, Becker KL, Seeliger JC, Rohde KH, Sucheck SJ. Discovery of 2,4,5-substituted benzoxazole derivatives as Pks13 inhibitors via the scaffold hopping strategy. ACS Infect Dis 2025;11(6): 1460-72. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  235. 235.
    Chen S, Kinney WA, Van Lanen S. Nature’s combinatorial biosynthesis and recently engineered production of nucleoside antibiotics in Streptomyces. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;33(4): 66. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  236. 236.
    Tercero JA, Espinosa JC, Lacalle RA, Jiménez A. The biosynthetic pathway of the aminonucleoside antibiotic puromycin, as deduced from the molecular analysis of the pur cluster of Streptomyces alboniger. J Biol Chem 1996;271(3): 1579-90. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  237. 237.
    Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Glupczynski Y, Tulkens PM. Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43(4): 727-37. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  238. 238.
    Krause KM, Serio AW, Kane TR, Connolly LE. Aminoglycosides: an overview. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016;6(6): a027029. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  239. 239.
    Hosoda K, Koyama N, Shigeno S, Nishimura T, Hasegawa N, Kanamoto A, et al. Mavintramycin A is a promising antibiotic for treating Mycobacterium avium complex infectious disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2024;68(3): e00917-e923. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  240. 240.
    Igarashi M, Nakagawa N, Doi N, Hattori S, Naganawa H, Hamada M, Caprazamycin B. a novel anti-tuberculosis antibiotic, from Streptomyces sp. J Antibiot 2003;56(6): 580-3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  241. 241.
    Gan M, Zheng X, Liu Y, Guan Y, Xiao C. Three new 12-carbamoylated streptothricins from Streptomyces sp. I08A 1776. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2012;22(19): 6151-4. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  242. 242.
    Bu Y, Yamazaki H, Ukai K, Namikoshi M. Anti-mycobacterial nucleoside antibiotics from a marine-derived Streptomyces sp. TPU1236A. Mar Drugs 2014;12(12): 6102-12. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  243. 243.
    Ding L, Maier A, Fiebig HH, Lin WH, Peschel G, Hertweck C. Kandenols A-E, eudesmenes from an endophytic Streptomyces sp. of the mangrove tree Kandelia candel. J Nat Prod 2012;75(12): 2223-7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  244. 244.
    Cao DD, Trinh TTV, Mai HDT, Vu VN, Le HM, Thi QV, et al. Antimicrobial lavandulylated flavonoids from a sponge-derived Streptomyces sp. G248 in East Vietnam Sea. Mar Drugs 2019;17(9): 529. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  245. 245.
    Kaari M, Joseph J, Manikkam R, Kalyanasundaram R, Sivaraj A, Anbalmani S, et al. A novel finding: 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol from Streptomyces bacillaris ANS2 effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and cancer cell lines. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2023;195(11): 6572-85. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  246. 246.
    Serrano CM, Kanna Reddy HR, Eiler D, Koch M, Tresco BIC, Barrows LR, et al. Unifying the aminohexopyranose-and peptidyl-nucleoside antibiotics: implications for antibiotic design. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2020;59(28): 11330-3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  247. 247.
    Devi S, Sharma M, Manhas RK. Purification and biological analysis of antimicrobial compound produced by an endophytic Streptomyces sp. Sci Rep 2023;13(1): 15248. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  248. 248.
    Wiker F, Hauck N, Grond S, Gust B. Caprazamycins: Biosynthesis and structure activity relationship studies. Int J Med Microbiol 2019;309(5): 319-24. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  249. 249.
    Bär D, Konetschny B, Kulik A, Xu H, Paccagnella D, Beller P, et al. Origin of the 3-methylglutaryl moiety in caprazamycin biosynthesis. Microb Cell Fact 2022;21(1): 232. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  250. 250.
    Franck E, Crofts TS. History of the streptothricin antibiotics and evidence for the neglect of the streptothricin resistome. NPJ Antimicrob Resist 2024;2(1): 3. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  251. 251.
    Morgan CE, Kang YS, Green AB, Smith KP, Dowgiallo MG, Miller BC, et al. Streptothricin F is a bactericidal antibiotic effective against highly drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria that interacts with the 30S subunit of the 70S ribosome. PLoS Biol 2023;21(5): e3002091. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  252. 252.
    Wibowo JT, Bayu A, Aryadi WD, Fernandes C, Yanuar A, Kijjoa A, et al. Secondary metabolites from marine-derived bacteria with antibiotic and antibiofilm activities against drug-resistant pathogens. Mar Drugs 2023;21(1): 50. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  253. 253.
    Igarashi M, Ishizaki Y, Takahashi Y. New antituberculous drugs derived from natural products: current perspectives and issues in antituberculous drug development. J Antibiot 2017;71(1): 15-25. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  254. 254.
    Moloney MG. Natural products as a source for novel antibiotics. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2016;37(8): 689-701. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  255. 255.
    Newman DJ. Something ‘Old, New, Borrowed, or Blue’, the search for Mother Nature’s bioactive agents. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2024;88: 103162. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2025

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luana Layse Câmara de Almeida
    • 1
  • Sayoane Pessoa Fernandes
    • 1
  • Genil Dantas de Oliveira
    • 2,3
  • Marcelly da Silveira Silva
    • 1
  • Thalisson Amorim de Souza
    • 2
  • Valnês S. Rodrigues-Junior
    • 3
  • Samuel Paulo Cibulski
    • 1,4
  •     
  1. 1. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil
  2. 2. Laboratório Multiusuário de Caracterização e Análise (LMCA), Instituto de Pesquisa em Fármacos e Medicamentos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa Paraíba, Brazil
  3. 3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produtos Naturais e Sintéticos Bioativos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
  4. 4. FACISA–Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil