Medicinal Plant Using Ground State Stabilization of Natural Antioxidant Curcumin by Keto-Enol Tautomerisation

  • S. Manimaran 1,  
  • K. SambathKumar 2,  
  • R. Gayathri 3,  
  • K. Raja 4,  
  • N. Rajkamal 5,  
  • M. Venkatachalapathy 5,  
  • G. Ravichandran 6,  
  • C. Lourdu EdisonRaj 6
  •     

Abstract

Curcumin is a medicinal agent that exhibits anti-cancer properties and bioactive pigment in Turmeric has a huge therapeutic value. It has a keto-enol moiety that gives rise to many of its chemical properties. A recent study has shown that keto-enol tautomerisation at this moiety is implicated the effect of curcumin. The tautomerisation of curcumin in methanol, acetone and acetonitrile are used in nuclear magnetic resonance (1H, 13C) spectroscopy. It was characterized using UV, IR and Raman spectral values. The molecular electrostatic potential surface of the Curcumin has been visualized in electropositive potential in the region of the CH3+ group and most electronegative potential in the two oxygen atom has very strong binding group. In the following, the modality of structural and thermo dynamical parameters, electrophilicity (ω), chemical potential (μ), chemical hardness (η) and electronic charge transfer confirms the local reactivity. The rate constant of tautomerisation of curcumin shows strong temperature dependence. Molecular electrostatic potential and Temperature dependence of various thermodynamic properties like (Cp, m0, Sm0, and Hm0) is increase with increase in temperature for monomer and dimer of various electrical fields.

Keywords

Curcumin    NMR    UV    HOMO-LUMO    MEP    

1 Introduction

Curcuma longa Linn (turmeric) is a medicinal plant botanically related to Zingaberaceae family. Turmeric powder derived from the rhizome of Curcuma longa is commonly used as a spice, food preservative and food colouring agent. It also has a long history of therapeutic uses. The compound shows yellow colour in Turmeric are three curcuminoids namely curcumin, demethoxycurcumin and bisdemethoxy curcumin. Curcumin [1, 7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1, 6-heptadiene-3, 5-dione], a yellow bioactive pigment is the major component of Turmeric. Curcumin shows some biological activities exhibiting anti-inflammatory [1-5], antifungal, anticarcinogenic, antibacterial [6], antiprotozoal wound healing, antispasmodic, anticoagulant, antitumor and hepatoprotective activities [7-10]. Antioxidant and wound-healing gives by curcumin, its anticancer and anti-viral attributes, its effect on lymphocytes, platlet aggregation, detoxification mechanism. Curcumin is a potential anticancer drug it show its effect through molecular targets and it also cure colon cancer. The water-soluble extract turmerin, inhibits HIV infected T cell proliferation. It has also been studied extensively as a chemo preventive agent in several cancer cells [11-16]. From the figure the acceptor site is the active region to cure cancer cells and also some tumors. Structurally curcuminoids are linear 1, 7-diaryl-1, 6-heptadiene-3, 5-diones which exist in tautomeric forms as α, β unsaturated 1, 3-diketo form and enol form. The proton-transfer of dissociation is associated with radical-scavenging mechanisms of curcumin. The curcumin structure containing enol form supposes to be more stable than diketo form. Curcumin has a potential singlet oxygen quencher at low conditions. The compound has an effect in protecting skin against UV light. The results indicate that unsaturation in the side chain a methoxy group on benzene ring and keto-enol in the curcumin molecule structural. The theoretical also reported wherein DFT and TD-DFT calculations help to find out keto-enol equilibrium of curcumin in solution state and low pKa value for the dissocation of enol proton. Quanta methods are useful in determining the effect of inter molecular interactions on the vibrational spectra. The pervious study explain the understanding of hydrogen bonding that conform spectroscopic approach (FT-IR, FT-Raman) with quantum chemical methods (DFT). Density Functional theory is useful in vibrational assignment, hydrogen bonding, High chemical reactivity (Homo-Lumo) and NMR. The delocalisation of π-electron is further supported by red-shifted UV-visible absorption maximum of keto-enol tautomer of curcumin.

2 Analytical Instruments

The chemicals required were obtained from Sigma Aldrich chemical suppliers and are of analar grade. UV spectra were recorded on a Schimadzu UV-VIS-1601 spectrophotometer. FTIR spectra (KBr pellets) were recorded on 8101 Schimadzu FTIR spectrophotometer recorded in the region 4000-400 cm-1. FT-Raman spectra have been recorded in the region 3500-50 cm-1on a Perkin-Elmer spectrometer. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 300 NMR spectrophotometer. The photoluminescence spectra of curcumin deposited on SiO2/Si were recorded at room temperature on a Fluorolog-3 Model FL3-221 spectro fluorometer system (HORIBA Jobin-Yvon). The emission spectra were measured utilizing a 450 W xenon lamp as the excitation source.

3 Computational Details

Advanced geometries of the title compound in the ground state were obtained by the density functional theory (DFT) [17] and B3LYP functional with 6-311++G(d, p) basis set utilizing Gaussian 09 program package. The basis set 6-311++G(d, p) fragmentation by d polarization functions on heavy atoms and p polarization functions on hydrogen atoms have been used [18-20]. Quantum theory of atoms in molecules calculations has been done to predict intermolecular interactions using this software. The conformers analysis, first hyperpolarizability, 1H, 13C and 17O NMR, HOMO-LUMO and ESP analyses under various electric fields are carried out by B3LYP/6-311G++(d, p) method. The thermodynamic functions such as entropy, enthalpy and the heat capacity where carried out for the different temperatures. Curcumin has two hydrophobic phenyl groups. But the molecule assumes different conformations that can maximize π-π and van der Waals interactions with aromatic and some hydrophobic amino acid residues of proteins [21-25]. Phenolic hydroxyl and methoxy groups, as well as the keto and enol groups present on the ends and in the middle of the molecule has strong interaction as well as directed hydrogen-bonding.

The keto-enol tautomerism introduces additional functionality, with the possibility to locate donor and acceptor groups for hydrogen bonding in many ways. But the α, β-unsaturated keto can serve as a acceptor for nucleophilic attack. The difference between two tautomers is the hybridization of the carbon at the (α) position. While sp2 hybridiation is present in the keto-enol tautomer, the diketo tautomer has sp3 hybridisation. Finally, there is intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the keto-enol tautomer, which is absent in diketo tautomer of curcumin. It has been shown that the strength of the hydrogen bond at the keto-enol is strongly correlated to delocalization of π-electron in β-diketones.

4 Results and Discussion

4.1 Molecular Geometry

Fourteen conformers are mainly expected to exist for Curcumin, respectively. The optimized parameters of monomer and dimer structures of Curcumin are represented. Generally geometrical parameters such as bond lengths, bond angles are the important factors in determining the electronic properties of the molecule that are listed in Table 1. The numbering scheme of monomer structures is denoted in Fig. 1 respectively. The optimization of dimer for the title compound is carried out in order to simulate H bonding through phenol group. The optimized structures with inter molecular hydrogen bonds description are given in Fig. 2. The intermolecular interaction is observed between C-H···O and O-H···H. This intermolecular interaction is stabilizing in Curcumin. The bond lengths of C=O are lengthened in dimer optimization [26]. To find the most optimized geometry, the energy calculations are carried out for various possible conformers are listed in Table 2. The conformers of Curcumin are shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1

Optimized parameters of Curcumin using B3LYP/6-311 ++G(d, p) method

Bond length Values (Å) Bond angle Values (°) Dihedral angle Values (°)
Monomer Dimer Monomer Dimer Monomer Dimer
C1-C2 1.3882 1.3920/1.3921 C2-C1-C6 132.7684 135.22/135.71 C6-C1-C2-C3 0.0651 0.0813/0.0824
C1-C6 1.411 1.4523/1.4554 C2-C1-C34 112.9745 114.21/114.22 C6-C1-C2-H7 179.9847 179.99/180.99
C1-C34 1.3865 1.3955/1.3958 C6-H1-C34 114.0209 116.13/116.14 C34-C1-C2-C3 179.7903 179.90/179.99
C2-C3 1.4157 1.4278/1.4288 C1-C2-C3 123.5507 124.86/124.89 C34-C1-C2-H7 0.0093 0.0097/0.0098
C2-H7 1.0783 1.0883/1.0893 C1-CH2-7 122.4276 123.56/123.57 C2-C1-C6-C5 -0.02112 -0.0253/-0.0264
C3-C4 1.4116 1.4236/1.4246 C3-C2-H7 117.1557 119.31/119.32 C2-C1-C6-O33 179.9753 180.99/181.99
C3-C10 1.4582 1.4882/1.4892 C2-C3-C4 127.7998 128.19/128.20 C34-C1-C6-C5 178.9574 179.97/179.99
C4-C5 1.3923 1.3933/1.3933 C2-C3-C10 115.0424 117.11/117.12 C34-C1-C6-O33 -0.0472 -0.068/-0.069
C4-C8 1.0822 1.0922/1.0923 C4-C3-C10 125.041 126.13/126.14 C2-C1-C34-H40 0.2032 0.5029/0.5029
C5-C6 1.3941 1.3951/1.3955 C3-C4-C5 114.4352 115.22/115.23 C6-C1-C34-H40 -179.7731 -179.78/-179.79
C5-H9 1.0838 1.0839/1.0839 C3-C4-H8 120.4471 121.67/121.68 C1-C2-C3-C4 -0.0959 -0.099/-0.099
C6-O33 1.3859 1.3990/1.3991 C5-C4-H8 111.9368 113.32/113.33 C1-C2-C3-C10 179.8702 179.98/179.99
C10-H11 1.088 1.098/1.0982 C4-C5-C6 130.1204 132.16/132.17 C7-C2-C3-C4 179.9817 179.99/179.99
C10-C12 1.3632 1.3720/1.3721 C4-C5-H9 117.9138 118.88/118.89 C7-C2-C3-C10 -0.0521 -0.524/-0.525
C12-H13 1.0843 1.0943/1.0944 C6-C5-H9 115.1853 117.54/117.55 C2-C3-C4-C5 0.0841 0.088/0.089
C12-C14 1.4693 1.4799/1.4799 C1-C6-C5 131.1186 133.66/133.67 C2-C3-C4-O8 -179.9804 -179.98/-179.99
C14-C15 1.4613 1.4931/1.4933 C1-C6-O33 113.6922 115.69/115.70 C10-C3-C4-C5 -179.865 -179.88/-179.99
C14-O31 1.2728 1.2921/1.2922 C5-C6-O33 122.936 125.41/125.42 C10-C3-C4-H8 0.0405 0.042/0.045
C15-H16 1.0812 1.0922/1.0923 C3-C10-H11 118.6409 120.67/120.68 C2-C3-C10-H11 179.273 179.28/179.29
C15-C17 1.3644 1.3823/1.3824 C3-C10-C12 118.2982 119.22/119.23 C2-C3-C10-C12 177. 234 177.25/177.28
C17-C18 1.4568 1.4768/1.4769 H11-C10-C12 121.0265 122.12/122.12 C4-C3-C10-H11 -0.7604 -0.76/-0.78
C17-H32 1.3902 1.3905/1.3906 C10-H12-H13 119.7609 121.23/121.23 C4-C3-C10-C12 178.9757 178.98/178.99
C18-H19 1.0807 1.0975/1.0977 C10-H12-C14 119.1506 122.50/122.51 C3-C4-C5-C6 -0.042 -0.045/-0.046
C18-C20 1.3543 1.3743/1.3744 H13-H12-C14 120.3202 121.55/121.56 C3-C4-C5-C9 179.9578 179.98/179.99
C20-H21 1.0864 1.0998/1.0999 H12-C14-C15 119.0714 122.09/122.10 C8-C4-C5-C6 -179.9677 -179.96/-179.99
C20-C22 1.4755 1.4957/1.4958 H12-C14-O31 120.6047 121.56/121.57 C8-C4-C5-C9 0.0321 0.0343/0.0345
C22-C23 1.4088 1.4189/1.4189 C15-C14-O31 119.9994 120.91/120.92 C4-C5-C6-C1 0.0986 0.0996/0.0998
C22-C24 1.4165 1.4177/1.4178 C14-C15-H16 121.3894 123.34/123.35 C4-C5-C6-O33 -179.9865 -179.98/-179.99
C23-C25 1.3983 1.3988/1.399 C14-C15-C17 118.6033 119.60/119.61 H9-C5-C6-C1 -179.9912 -179.99/-179.99
C23-C26 1.0803 1.0822/1.0823 C16-C15-C17 120.6268 121.66/121.67 H9-C5-C6-O33 0.0137 0.053/0.055
C24-C27 1.3858 1.3958/1.3959 C15-C17-C18 126.2821 128.02/128.03 C1-C6-O33-H37 179.9102 179.95/179.96
C24-H28 1.0807 1.0807/1.0809 C15-C17-H32 113.0909 115.10/115.11 C5-C6-O33-H37 -0.0946 -0.094/-0.097
C25-H29 1.3877 1.3988/1.3989 C18-C17-H32 119.6991 120.22/120.21 C3-C10-C12-H13 -179.6806 -179.68/-179.69
C25-H30 1.0799 1.0999/1.0999 C17-C18-H19 120.2667 121.34/121.35 C3-C10-C12-C14 -0.1829 -0.18/-0.19
C27-H29 1.4081 1.4271/1.4272 H19-C18-C20 120.0295 123.12/123.13 H11-C10-C12-H13 0.0526 0.062/0.066
C27-H36 1.3982 1.3999/1.3999 C18-C20-H21 112.8729 114.56/114.57 H11-C10-C12-C14 179.5504 179.65/179.699
H29-H35 1.3816 1.3976/1.3977 C18-C20-C22 11.3221 13.56/13.57 C10-C12-C14-C15 -178.6261 -178.92/-178.98
H32-O38 0.9737 0.9887/0.9899 H21-C20-C22 18.1203 19.38/19.39 C10-C12-C14-O31 1.6822 1.78/1.79
O33-H37 0.9723 0.9997/0.9998 C20-C22-C23 109.5762 119.51/119.52 H13-C12-C14-C15 0.8766 0.87/0.88
C34-H40 1.4553 1.4735/1.4736 C20-C22-C24 119.2491 119.77/119.78 H13-C12-C14-31 -178.8151 -178.81/-178.89
H35-O39 0.9761 0.9961/0.9962 C23-C22-C24 11.2178 11.24/11.25 C12-C14-C15-H16 -0.7205 -0.75/-0.77
H36-H41 1.4536 1.4760/1.4761 C24-C22-C25 104.7581 106.23/106.24 C12-C14-C15-C17 179.8357 179.83/179.88
H40-H42 1.0913 1.1014/1.1015 C22-C23-C25 111.1819 114.34/114.35 O31-C14-C15-H16 178.9751 178.97/178.98
H40-O43 1.0848 1.0999/1.0999 C22-C23-C26 110.1567 112.23/112.24 O31-C14-C15-C17 -0.4687 -0.46/-0.49
H40-H44 1.0914 1.0966/1.0967 C25-C23-C26 109.3189 110.22/110.23 C14-C15-C17-C18 1.6541 1.65/1.67
H41-O45 1.0914 1.0978/1.0979 C22-C24-C27 110.1395 113.56/113.57 C14-C15-C17-H32 178.4673 178.46/178.55
H41-O46 1.0845 1.0950/1.0951 C22-C24-C28 110.8085 114.53/114.55 H16-C15-C17-C18 -177.7997 -177.79/-177.80
H41-O47 1.0914 1.0967/1.09 68 C1-C34-H40 105.33 107.33/107.35 H16-C15-C17-H32 -0.9865 -0.98/-0.99

Fig. 1

Optimized monomer molecular structure of curcumin

Fig. 2

Optimized dimer molecular structure of curcumin

Table 2

Optimized global minimum energies of different conformers of curcumin calculated at B3LYP/6- 311++G(d, p) level of theory

Conformer B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p)
1 -1263.12a
2 -1266.90
3 -1269.07
4 -1264.42
5 -1268.21
6 -1270.88
7 -1261.72
8 -1260.11
9 -1265.56
10 -1262.22
11 -1269.09
12 -1267.16
13 -1273.34
14 -1275.06
15 -1271.23
aGlobal minimum energy

Fig. 3

Various conformers of curcumin

4.2 Two Rotor PES Scan Studies

The two rotor potential energy surface (PES) scan with the B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) level of theoretical approximations was performed for Curcumin is shown in Fig. 4, respectively. The calculated potential energy curves of the molecule in this approach a recent study were consistent with distinct minima that correspond to gauche (-)-gauche-gauche (G1gg), trans-trans-gauche (Ttg), trans-gauche-gauche (Tgg), trans-gauche-gauche (-) (Tgg1) and gauche(-)-gauche-trans (G1gt) conformers in the order of decreasing relative stability. The dihedral angle C35-C34-O6-C5 and C42-C41-O27-C24 for curcumin is also relevant coordinate for conformational flexibility within the molecule. For this rotation minimum energy curves have been obtained at 20°, 40°, 60°, 80°—as shown in Fig. 4 clearly demonstrate that flexibility inside the bonds for curcumin atoms.

Fig. 4

Three rotor PES Scan of curcumin

5 Transition State Calculations

The vibrational spectrum of a transition state is characterized by one imaginary frequency (implying a negative and positive field), which means that in one direction in nuclear configuration space the energy has a maximum, while in all other orthogonal directions the energy is a minimum. The fundamental modes of curcumin along with the calculated IR, Raman frequencies and normal mode descriptions (characterized by TED) are reported in Table 3. The observed and calculated FTIR and FT-Raman spectra of curcumin are performed in B3LYP levels using 6-311++G(d, p) basis set are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Also, it should be noted that the experimental results belong to solid phase and theoretical calculations belong to gaseous phase.

Table 3

The observed FT-IR and FT-Raman frequencies (cm-1) for the Dimer, various applied electric fields (VÅ-1) and probable assignments (characterized by TED) of curcumin using B3LYP methods

Symmetry Species Cs Observed frequencies (cm-1)
FT-IR FT-Raman 0.01 VÅ-1 0.02 VÅ-1 Dimer 0.00 VÅ-1 Assignments with TED (%) among types of internal co-ordinates
Positive field Negative field Positive field Negative field
A 3308 - 3358 3196 3656 3356 4367/4113 νOH (99)
A 3289 3357 3184 3615 3351 4241/4085 νOH (98)
A 3280 3281 3346 3181 3290 3244 4222/4053 νOH (97)
A - 3076 3342 3172 3267 3231 4217/4027 νCH (96)
A - 3045 3338 3166 3142 3125 4188/4012 νCH (95)
A - 3023 3331 3151 3107 3100 3654/3542 νCH (94)
A - 2989 1632 1617 1711 1701 3007/2986 νCH (93)
A - 2971 1591 1553 1620 1605 2840/2814 νCH (92)
A - 2965 1553 1518 1561 1545 2734/2720 νCH (91)
A - 2987 1527 1509 1490 1456 2717/2709 νCH (90)
A 2924 2978 1475 1461 1450 1423 2610/2605 νCH (88)
A - 2945 1425 1415 1417 1401 2576/2554 νCH (87)
A 2900 2901 1394 1382 1329 1319 2519/2507 νCH(86)
A - 2609 1348 1332 1279 1255 2432/2418 CH3ss (85)
A 2500 - 1340 1312 1248 1232 2409/2400 CH3ss (84)
A - 2467 1291 1287 1205 1195 1960/1958 νCH(83)
A - 2384 1266 1256 1170 1152 1935/1935 CH3ips (82)
A 2359 - 1206 1200 1118 1103 1925/1889 CH3ips (80)
A 2250 - 1141 1132 1075 1056 1920/1819 CH3ops(79)
A 2223 - 1123 1114 1069 1031 1895/1786 CH3ops(78)
A 2158 - 1052 1041 1020 1007 1854/1749 bOH(77)
A - 1890 1009 1000 969 954 1780/1679 bOH(76)
A 1769 - 998 988 947 931 1631/1530 bOH(75)
A - 1712 995 976 909 897 1617/1513 νCC (74)
A 1645 - 947 931 906 863 1402/1301 νCC(73)
A - 1596 929 913 841 825 1203/1100 νCC (72)
A - 1581 889 857 769 754 998/974 νCC(71)
A 1569 - 831 821 731 722 958/943 νCC (70)
A - 1555 811 801 660 643 942/934 νCC(69)
A 1543 1544 774 753 644 622 888/853 νCC (68)
A 1522 1521 756 730 630 612 820/806 νCC(67)
A 1423 - 718 691 595 588 803/799 νC= O(66)
A 1345 - 659 635 579 563 792/743 CH3 ipb(64)
A - 1289 654 616 513 500 736/721 CH3 ipb(63)
A 1256 - 579 534 493 475 687/604 CH3 sb(62)
A - 1212 548 529 404 391 597/587 CH3 sb(61)
A 1178 - 499 464 378 363 534/512 CH3 ipr(60)
A 1156 - 438 443 353 334 487/467 CH3 ipr(59)
A - 978 436 403 317 305 456/423 ωOH(58)
A 956 - 421 365 272 254 412/402 ωOH(57)
A - 934 375 358 256 246 400/378 ωOH(56)
A 856 - 304 280 223 211 356/324 CH3opb(55)
A 670 - 187 156 212 207 323/312 CH3opb(54)
A - 632 156 143 181 172 318/305 CH3opr(53)
A 614 - 122 112 153 134 300/267 CH3opr(52)
- 579 109 97 137 122 281/279 CH3twist(51)
540 373 87 71 110 91 236/212 CH3twist(50)
ν stretching, ss symmetric stretching, ass asymmetric stretching, b bending, ω out-of-plane bending, R ring, trigd trigonal deformation, symd symmetric deformation, asymd antisymmetric deformation, t torsion, s strong, vs very strong, ms medium strong, w weak, vw very weak

Fig. 5

Experimental FTIR spectra of curcumin

Fig. 6

Experimental FT-Raman spectra of curcumin

5.1 C-H Vibrations

The aromatic organic compounds structure shows the presence of asymmetric C-H stretching vibrations in the region 3100-3000 cm-1 [27], which is the characteristics region for recognition on C-H stretching vibrations. In the title molecule, bands have been observed at 2924, 2900 and 3076, 3045, 3023, 2989, 2971, 2965, 2987, 2978, 2945, 2901, 2467 cm-1 assigned to C-H stretching vibrations in FT-IR and FT-Raman spectra, respectively. The C-H in-plane and out of- plane bending vibrations normally take place as a number of intensity sharp bends in the region of 1300-1000 and 1000-750 cm-1, respectively. Theoretical Positive field and negative field for C-H in-plane and C-H out-of-plane bending vibrations by B3LYP/6-311++G (d, p) method showed excellent agreement with the spectrum.

5.2 O-H Vibrations

The hydroxyl stretching vibrations are [27] observed in the region around 3500 cm-1. The peak is broader and its intensity is higher than that of a free O-H vibration, which indicates involvement in an inter molecular hydrogen bond. So the O-H stretching vibrations of curcumin are observed at 3308, 3280 cm-1 and 3289 in FT-IR and FT-Raman. The in-plane O-H deformation vibration usually appears in the region 1440-1260 cm-1 in the spectrum, which gets shifted to higher wave number in the presence of hydrogen bonding. The O-H out-of-plane bending vibrations give rise to broadband identified in the region 700-600 cm-1. Theoretical Positive field and negative field for hydroxyl vibration under goes a large shift due to hydrogen bonding.

5.3 C-C Vibrations

The ring C-C stretching vibrations, usually occurs in the region 1400-1625 cm-1 [27]. In accordance with above literature data in our present study, the bands for C-C stretching vibrations are observed at 1645, 1569, 1543, 1522 cm-1and 1712, 1596, 1581, 1555, 1544, 1521 cm-1 in FT-IR and FT-Raman spectra, respectively. These observed frequencies show that, the substitutions in the ring to some extend affect the ring mode of vibrations. The comparison of the theoretically (Positive field and negative field) values are good agreement with B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) method. The in-plane and out-of-plane bending vibrations of C-C group are also listed out in the Table 3.

5.4 C=O Vibrations

The interaction of carbonyl group with other groups present in the system did not produce such a drastic and characteristic change in the frequency of C-O stretch as did by interaction of C-C stretch. The carbon-oxygen double bond is formed by pπ-pπ between carbon and oxygen. Because of the different electron negativities of carbon and oxygen atoms, the bonding electrons are not equally distributed between the two atoms. The lone pair of electrons on oxygen also determines the nature of the carbonyl group. The position of the C-O stretching vibration is very sensitive to various factors such as the physical state, electronic effects by substituent, ring strains. Normally carbonyl group vibrations occur in the region 1850-1600 cm-1 [27]. In this study, the C=O stretching vibrations of curcumin are observed at 1423 cm-1 in FTIR spectrum. The in-plane and out-of-plane bending vibrations of C=O group have also been identified and presented in Table 3. Positive field and negative field values are correlated with B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) method.

5.5 CH3 Group Vibrations

The curcumin molecule under consideration possesses CH3 groups. For the assignments of CH3 group frequencies one can expected that nine fundamentals can be associated to each CH3 group, three stretching, three bending, two rocking modes and a single torsional mode describe the methyl group. The CH3 symmetric stretching frequency is identified at 2500 cm-1 in the FTIR spectrum and 2609 cm-1 in the FT-Raman spectrum for curcumin. The CH3 in-plane stretching vibrations are identified at 2359 cm-1 in the FTIR spectrum and 2384 cm-1 in the FT-Raman spectrum. The CH3 symmetric bending and CH3 in-plane bending frequencies are attributed at 1256 and 1345 cm-1 in the FTIR spectrum and 1212, 1289 cm-1 in the FT Raman spectrum. The in-plane rocking and out-of-plane rocking modes of CH3 group are found at 1178, 1156 and 614 cm-1 in the FTIR spectrum and 632 cm-1 in the FT-Raman spectrum. The bands obtained at 2250, 2223 cm-1 and 856, 670 cm-1 in the FTIR spectrum for curcumin assigned to CH3 out-of-plane stretching and CH3 out-of-plane bending modes, respectively. The assignment of the bands at 540 and 579, 373 cm-1 in the FTIR and FT Raman spectrum for curcumin attributed to methyl twisting mode.

5.6 NMR Data Analysis

The isotropic chemical shifts are frequently used as an aid in identification of reactive ionic species. It is acknowledged that accurate predictions of molecular geometries are essential for reliable calculations of magnetic properties. The calculated chemical shifts for 13C, 1H, and 17O NMR are shown in Table 4. The calculations reported here are performed in methanol solution, rather than in the gas phase, using IEF-PCM model. 1H atom is mostly localized on periphery of the molecules and their chemical shifts would be more susceptible to intermolecular interactions in the aqueous solutions as compared to other heavier atoms. Aromatic carbons give signals in overlapped areas of the spectrum with chemical shift values from 100 to 150 ppm [28-30]. In this study, the theoretical chemical shift values of aromatic carbons except C11 of Cur cumin are in the range of 98.3004-143.6594 ppm in the solvent. The chemical shift of C4 (143.1092 ppm in Methanol and 143.6594 ppm in Acetonitrile) is greater than the other aromatic carbons because of the substitution of OH group in Curcumin. The C25 and H32 atoms are deshielded due to the presence of electronegative oxygen in the OH group. Due to shielding effect which is the non-electronegative property of hydrogen atom, the chemical shift values of ring carbon atoms are lower than C4 and C14. The chemical shift values of aromatic protons are in the range of 6.5193-8.9553 ppm in Cur cumin for the solvents. The chemical shift value of H16 is very smaller than the aromatic protons since it is attached with electronegative atom, oxygen O31 of Cur cumin. The hydrogen atoms present in phenol group of Cur cumin experience little more shielding than other aromatic hydrogen atoms. 17O has a very wide chemical shift range which for small molecules partially compensates for its broad signals. The chemical shift of 17O is ranging from -40 to 1120 ppm [31]. In the title compound, the peaks at 370.0681 and 367.4292 ppm are assigned to O33 which is phenol group oxygen of the methanol and acetonitrile compounds. The chemical shift magnitude of methanol and acetonitrile 209.3890 and 210.3421 ppm is indicating the presence of hydroxyl oxygen (O43) of Cur cumin. Noticeably, the oxygen chemical shift of phenol group is larger than other oxygen due to the environment. Chemical shift (δ) of the collected NMR spectra were referenced to the residue proton resonance of the corresponding solvents, which are δ=3.31, 2.05, 1.94 and 3.33, 2.08, 1.99 ppm for the pentet proton signal of the two methyl group in methanol, acetone and acetonitrile, respectively. Assignments of the 1H NMR spectra of curcumin in methanol, acetone and acetonitrile are shown in Fig. 7. The time-dependent 1H NMR spectra of curcumin in methanol, acetone and acetonitrile from δ=8.5 to 5.0 ppm recorded at 45 ℃. It is clear that the intensity of the Hα peak, which has a δ of approximately 6 ppm, decrease as function of time in all three solvent. But methanol takes 3 h at 45 ℃ as shown in Fig. 8a and acetone, acetonitrile at 45 ℃ as shown in Fig. 8b, c. The Fig. 9 shows the decrease in Hα area in methanol, acetone and acetonitrile at several temperatures. The decrease in intensity of the Hα signal is proportional to the decrease of concentration of curcumin. The rate constant of tautomerisation of curcumin in methanol, acetone and acetonitrile at various temperatures are shown in Table 5. The rate constant of tautomerisation of curcumin in acetone are larger than that in acetonitrile at same temperature, indicates faster conversion of keto-enol to diketo tautomer of curcumin of acetone.

Table 4

The calculated 1H, 11C and 17O NMR isotropic chemical shifts (all values in ppm) for curcumin using GIAO method

Atoms Theoretical method Experimental method
Methanol Acetonitrile Methanol Acetone Acetonitrile
Chemical shielding Chemical shift Chemical shielding Chemical shift
C1 29.5578 99.0123 39.5708 100.0431
C2 33.4215 102.3436 31.1005 101.5644
C3 38.6543 109.1278 48.5439 112.1092
C4 40.6123 143.1092 45.2344 140.6594
C5 66.2360 123.3412 66.2360 125.3789
C6 76.1278 130.5678 79.2070 133.7841
H7 23.0591 6.5193 25.9001 6.9900 5.06 6.36 8.08
H8 79.3412 6.9356 88.4629 7.1991 5.70 6.95 7.92
H9 80.4576 7.5067 90.7456 7.8903 6.26 7.12 7.16
C10 123.4390 133.2378 135.9340 121.8759
H11 55.7123 6.7953 59.1239 6.9137 5.59 7.04 7.77
C12 122.5634 121.2376 120.3454 120.346
H13 61.7823 8.0551 60.8203 8.9553 5.92 6.61 7.91
C14 134.7654 119.4367 139.6050 121.2310
C15 120.7720 110.5476 121.2770 112.6754
H16 78.3120 7.9345 78.3120 8.0098 6.85 6.50 8.12
C17 136.8976 99.2310 126.8116 110.4328
C18 129.3245 78.3451 120.3512 99.4512
H19 88.2786 8.6130 80.7806 8.9973 6.19 7.34 8.34
C20 132.5431 77.8907 130.5301 87.9832
H21 87.9234 127.8923 90.2304 119.8235 5.88 7.77 8.59
C22 128.9812 122.3056 118.8129 116.2389
C23 125.7235 115.4523 122.3545 120.4521
C24 126.6709 111.2326 125.7091 115.2315
C25 132.2310 109.4376 130.3106 110.3678
C26 129.9076 103.3754 130.9006 106.2312
C27 122.6534 110.2783 125.3423 115.6754
H28 88.23678 7.9913 90.2780 8.6593 6.74 7.09 8.10
H29 67.9864 6.8023 65.6488 6.9993 6.47 6.23 8.25
H30 60.5431 7.1123 69.4112 7.5103 6.90 6.65 8.67
O31 214.9271 102.5643 215.910 111.2312
H32 88.2390 6.9930 80.3910 7.2345
O33 218.9661 109.2165 210.9610 10.3267
C34 136.8126 127.7612 130.8113 120.4321 3.31 2.05 1.94
H35 80.8257 8.0987 88.8723 8.5930
H36 44.6512 8.4436 48.5192 8.5193
H37 49.0378 8.0987 55.0845 8.2305
O38 219.1004 222.4512 224.0456 220.2312
C39 121.2786 103.5643 125.6234 115.5409 3.33 2.08 1.99
H40 55.8762 8.1913 58.7961 8.5123
H41 58.9064 7.4536 54.6674 7.536
H42 65.8924 7.7776 75.8490 7.9983
O43 221.1765 209.3890 219.1534 210.3421
H44 69.7865 8.0674 61.8605 8.5110
O45 225.2564 201.3267 205.6004 222.3267
O46 229.6054 221.4512 219.0540 220.7634
H47 72.3490 7.9876 75.9090 8.4593

Fig. 7

NMR spectra in a methanol, b acetone, and c acetonitrile

Fig. 8

NMR spectra for curcumin at 45 ℃ a methanol, b acetone, and c acetonitrile

Fig. 9

The decrease in Hα signal of curcumin in a methanol, b acetone and c acetonitrile as a function of time 25-45 ℃. The solid curves represent the line of best-fit result of analysis with rate equations

Table 5

Rate constant of tautomerisation of curcumin in methanol, acetone and acetonitrile several temperatures

Temperature K Methanol Acetone Acetonitrile
298 1000 12.0±1.9 4.0±0.3 1.7±0.3
303 890 20.9±6.9 6.2±0.9 2.6±1.5
308 800 36.8±2.5 11.10±0.8 4.2±0.9
313 720 55.2±3.1 12.9±1.6 8.1±2.2
318 650 88.1±10.1 18.9±1.7 8.9±3.1

5.7 UV-Vis Spectral Analysis

The visible and UV spectra of curcumin represent transitions between electronic energy levels. The transitions between a bonding or lone-pair orbital are non-bonding or anti-bonding orbital. But the absorption bandwidth could indicate the degree of agglomeration [32]. So the electronic absorption corresponds to the transition from the ground to the first excited state and is mainly described by one electron excitation from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO).Electronic transitions are usually classified according to the orbitals engaged or to specific parts of the molecule involved. Common types of electronic transitions in organic molecules are π-π*, n-π* and π*(acceptor)-π (donor). For Curcumin the UV-Vis absorption and transmisson spectra have been studied and show three intense peaks of 202, 417, 1014 nm for Ethanol and THF in Table 6. Observed band at 417 nm is due to the π-π* transition. The less intense band centered at 202 nm is due to the partly forbidden n-π* transition. The more intense band observed at 1014 nm is described to an allowed π*- π transition. Based on the above photo absorption theory, the frontier molecular orbitals (FMOS) of the molecule have been investigated according to the results obtained from the B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) calculations. The experimental absorbance and transmittance UV-Vis spectra are shown in Fig. 10. It also gives us the hint that the charge recombination should also be taken into account besides the widely considered criteria to design and screen of new efficient molecule for experimentalist.

Table 6

The computed excitation energies, oscillator strength, electronic transition configuration wavelength of Curcumin using TD-DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p)

Theoretical method Transition with contribution Theoretical method Transition with contribution Experimental method
Ethanol THF
EE (ev) Oscillator strength f Wavelength (nm) EE (ev) Oscillator strength f Wavelength (nm) Ethanol (nm) THF (nm)
0.0972 0.0076 1279.35 H-1→L (59.44%) 0.0972 0.0052 1398. 53 H-1→L (69.24%) 202 202
1.3777 0.0102 899.94 H→L+1 (50.84%) 1.3777 0.0309 1009. 32 H→L+1 (49.76%) 417 417
1.4709 0.0788 842.93 H→L (64.52%) 1.4709 0.0523 947. 30 H→L (56.12%) 1014 1014
1.9432 0.0892 957.56 H-1→L (44.52%) 1.9432 0.0690 910.53 H→L+1 (70.28%)
2.7658 0.0643 912.70 H→L+1 (75.14%) 2.7658 0.0765 999.22 H-1→L (42.18%)
2.0971 0.5625 785.88 H-2→L (61.72%) 2.0971 0.896 845.36 H→L (77.57%)

Fig. 10

Experimental absorbance and transmittance UV-Vis spectra of curcumin

5.8 Transport Properties

The spatial distribution of the frontier orbital is a three dimensional representation of local electron density of the molecule. The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are the frontier orbital's, the difference between them are known as HOMO-LUMO gap (HLG). HLG determines the transport properties of the molecule. Large decrease in the HLG predicts the possibility of having reasonable conduction through the molecule, since, the conductivity increases with decreases in HLG. So the field increases (0.00-0.15 VÅ-1) the HLG extensively decreases by using Gaussian 09 programme package. Figure 11 illustrates the spatial distribution of the molecular orbital of the molecule. Table 7, shows the small HLG exists in this molecular system, the possibility of conduction through the molecules is found to be very less, therefore, it almost act as an insulator.

Fig. 11

HOMO-LUMO plot of curcumin

Table 7

Electronic properties with various electric field's of curcumin

Parameters 0.00 VÅ-1 0.05 VÅ-1 0.1 VÅ-1 0.15 VÅ-1
HOMO (a.u) -0.256717 -0.234112 -0.232379 -0.245860
LUMO (a.u) -0.189864 -0.170982 -0.206169 -0.211352
Energy gap (Eg) (a.u) 0.066853 0.06313 0.02621 0.034508
Chemical hardness(η) (a.u) 0.066853 0.06313 0.02621 0.034508
Chemical potential (μ) (a.u) -0.223291 -0.202547 -0.219274 -0.228606
Electronegativity (χ) (a.u) +0.223291 +0.202547 +0.219274 +0.228606
Softness(S) (a.u) 14.958192 15.84033 38.15338 28.97879
Electrophilicity index (ω) (a.u) 0.372898 0.32493 0.91723 0.75723

5.8.1 Electric Fields on HOMO-LUMO Analysis

The analysis of the wave function is mainly described by one-electron excitation from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital. HOMO-LUMO analysis of these compound is done at B3LYP/6- 311++G(d, p) level of theory for the zero field and fields of 0.05.01 and 0.15 VA-1. Figure 11 illustrates the orbital distributions of HOMO and LUMO levels of the title compound for the zero field and biasing steps of 0.05.01 and 0.15 VA-1. HOMO is delocalized mainly on ring carbons; the oxygen of hydroxy also takes part in the formation of HOMO of curcumin for zero fields. The strong electron withdrawing group O of polyphenol group attracts the charge density while on other hand electron donating group hydroxy is attached on left hand of curcumin which would strengthen the donor ability. Hence LUMOs are distributed on the polyphenol group. In Curcumin, HOMO is delocalized mainly on ring carbons and there is no distribution of HOMO on polyphenol group. Figure 11 shows that there is no electronic projection in HOMO and LUMO over the ring hydrogen atoms of the compound in zero fields. The values of HOMO energy, LUMO energy and HLG are used as an indicator of kinetic stability of the molecule. Which shows that substituted hydroxyl have no effect on the title compound. When the field increases (0.0-0.15 VA-1), the HOMO-LUMO gap (HLG) extensively decreases from 0.06853 to 0.0345 eV for curcumin, respectively (Table 7). This large decrease in the HLG implies that the possibility of having reasonable conduction through the molecule, hence the conductivity increases with decreases in HLG. The variation of HLG with applied the electric field is also verified with density of states (DOS) spectrum. Figure 12 shows the density of states (DOS) for zero field, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15 VA-1.The green and red lines in the DOS spectrum are indicating that the HOMO and LUMO levels. The value of HLG measured in DOS spectrum is almost the same with the calculated value by Gaussian 09 W program package [33-35]. The DOS spectrum also shows that HOMO-LUMO gap decreases as increase in electric field. Further insight into the chemical reactivity analysis in relation to their electronegativity, chemical hardness and their aromaticity difference would assess the suitability of application process in curcumin.

Fig. 12

DOS spectrum of curcumin

5.9 Mullliken Charges

The Mulliken psychoanalysis is the finest population analysis method. The electron population of each atom of the molecules is identifying, because of calculating the mulliken charges are explained by the density functional methods. The charge distribution of the Curcumin gives the Carbon and Hydrogen charges had both signs. Oxygen atoms have negative charges in all basic sets, which are donor atoms. Mulliken atomic charge computation play a vital role in the relevance of quantum chemical calculation to molecular system because of atomic charge effect, dipole moment, molecular polarizability, electronic structure of the molecular systems. By using the Gaussian output shown in the Table 8. The molecule has different charge distribution with respect to the dynamic basic sets for quantum calculations. The predicted atomic charges are in graphical representation (Fig. 13). To change the basic set, the charge distribution should be changed. The charge change with origin set due to polarization For illustration, the charge of H(16) and H(19) atoms are -0.3390e, 0.3577e at B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) in the title compound curcumin. Thus the charges of the atoms are not varied according to electric field. Charge migration to heavy atoms can be related to molecular interactions in curcumin molecules.

Table 8

Mulliken charge of curcumin using B3LYP/6-311 ++G(d, p)

Atom No. 0.00 VÅ-1 0.05 VÅ-1 0.1 VÅ-1 0.15 VÅ-1
C1 0.086847 -0.024182 -0.008302 -0.325170
C2 -0.172636 -0.454099 -0.424706 -0.375011
C3 0.274180 0.470479 0.472686 0.499956
C4 0.254393 0.533688 0.551875 0.609097
C5 -0.118631 -0.438842 -0.426789 -0.386371
C6 -0.138775 -0.368391 -0.328251 -0.236610
H7 -0.149836 -0.142547 0.337729 -0.390048
H8 0.163524 0.280981 0.287917 0.314909
H9 -0.131957 -0.392618 0.297198 0.288442
C10 0.124668 0.294558 0.298511 0.318498
H11 0.308963 0.836655 0.849524 0.788269
C12 -0.580530 -0.912246 -0.774070 0.745018
H13 -0.198208 0.041912 -0.936011 0.418385
C14 0.127441 0.288061 0.300280 0.312129
C15 0.311387 0.964421 0.759970 1.011231
H16 -0.625503 -0.756989 -0.721159 -0.339039
C17 0.414234 0.454330 0.454291 0.453960
C18 -0.128214 -0.472383 -0.264393 0.494700
H19 0.132174 0.309119 0.327345 0.357721
C20 -0.153115 0.242813 0.795146 1.293723
H21 0.165946 0.260296 0.256487 0.263050
C22 0.087479 -0.871133 -0.519403 -0.753220
C23 -0.140098 -0.663842 -0.349952 -0.304823
C24 -0.118493 -0.429575 -0.419701 -0.409819
C25 0.254199 0.417244 0.469102 0.478777
C26 0.274591 0.548879 0.531076 0.503005
C27 -0.173794 -0.620065 -0.418024 -0.349877
H28 0.131018 0.299944 0.284802 0.270245
H29 0.147718 0.318470 0.317818 0.318071
H30 -0.619578 -0.936813 -1.006706 -1.057375
O31 0.397470 0.597232 0.681999 0.750933
H32 -0.603827 -0.547544 -0.500546 -0.403394
O33 -0.164927 -0.631759 -0.589280 -0.554964
C34 0.159547 0.076608 -0.191618 -0.513757
H35 0.159548 0.510890 0.690412 0.854806
H36 0.172965 0.315799 0.325133 0.343978
H37 0.144435 0.310030 0.304759 0.302369
O38 0.145587 0.318952 0.323437 0.335420
C39 -0.604032 -0.309873 0.230250 0.189667
H40 -0.164949 -0.667438 -0.922367 -1.971154
H41 0.159706 0.166929 -0.644723 -1.586309
H42 0.172648 0.302583 0.164796 -1.418660
O43 0.159708 0.131597 -1.275581 -1.628964
H44 -0.619699 -0.786000 -0.740768 -0.675913
O45 0.397439 0.490274 0.497844 0.498682
O46 0.347474 0.557234 0.641990 0.730936
H47 0.195957 0.230299 0.299480 0.268850

Fig. 13

Mulliken plot of curcumin

5.10 Nonlinear Optical Properties

The hyperpolarizability (β), dipole moment (μ) and polarizability (α) were calculated using B3LYPmethod with 6-311++G(d, p) basis set on the basis of the finite-field approach. The complete equations for calculating the magnitude of total static dipole moment (μ), Vector-first hyperpolarizability (βvec), the anisotropy of the polarizability (Δα) and the First hyperpolarizability (β), using the x, y, z components from Gaussian 09 W output is as follows:

where E0 is the energy of the unperturbed molecule, Fα is the field at the origin, and μα, ααβ and βαβγ are the components of dipole moment, polarizability and the first order hyperpolarizabilities, respαectively [36]. The total static dipole moment μ, and the mean first hyperpolarizability (β) using the x, y, z components, they are defined as:

where

The first hyperpolarizability is calculated using B3LYP/6-311G++(d, p) method. Since the value of hyperpolarizability (β) of the Gaussian 09 W output is reported in atomic units (a.u.), the calculated values have been converted into electrostatic units (esu) (β: 1 a.u.=8.639×10-33 esu). The first hyperpolarizabilities of curcumin are 3.0450 × 10-30 esu, respectively and are presented in Table 9. The first hyperpolarizability values of title compound are greater than that of urea (μ and β of urea are 1.3732 Debye and 0.3728×10-30 esu obtained by B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) method). Comparatively, first hyperpolarizability shows that curcumin is suitable for nonlinear optical studies.

Table 9

Nonlinear optical properties of curcumin at B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) methods and basis set calculations

NLO behaviour B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p)
Dipole moment (μ) 3.1727 Debye
Mean polarizability (α) 1.3793 × 10-30 esu
Anisotropy of the polarizabilty (Δα) 3.2723 × 10-30 esu
First hyperpolarizability (β) 3.0450 × 10-30 esu
Vector-first hyperpolarizability (βvec) 1.8270 × 10-30 esu

5.11 Molecular Electrostatic Potential (MEP)

The molecular electrostatic potential is related to the electronic density and is a very useful descriptor for determining the sites for electrophilic and nucleophilic reactions as well as hydrogen bonding interactions [36]. To predict reactive sites of electrophilic or nucleophilic attack for the investigated molecule, the MEP at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) optimized geometry was calculated. The various values of the electrostatic potential at the surface are represented by various colors. The color scheme for the MEP surface is red-electron rich, partially negative charge (electrophilic reactive center); blue-electron deficient, partially positive charge; light blue-slightly electron deficient region (nucleophilic reactive center); yellow-slightly electron rich region; green- neutral, respectively. The potential increases in the order red < orange < yellow < green < cyan < blue. It can be seen that the negative regions are mainly over the N atoms. The negative (red and yellow) regions of the MEP are related to electrophilic reactivity and the positive (blue) regions to nucleophilic reactivity, as shown in Figs. 14, 15 and 16. As can be seen from the figure, this molecule has several possible sites, C and O atoms for electrophilic attack. The importance of MESP lies in the fact that it simultaneously displays molecular size, shape as well as positive, negative and neutral electrostatic potential regions in terms of color grading and is very useful in research of molecular structure with its physiochemical property relationship.

Fig. 14

The total electron density surface of curcumin

Fig. 15

Electron density maps of curcumin

Fig. 16

The molecular electrostatic potential surface of curcumin

5.12 Thermodynamic Properties

Standard statistical thermodynamics function, heat capacity (Cp, m0), entropy (Sm0) and enthalpy changes (Hm0) (monomer and dimer) were computed at B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) basis set by using perl script THERMO.PL [37] and are listed in Table 10. Thermodynamic functions are all values increasing with temperature ranging from 100 to 1000 K due to the fact that the molecular vibrations intensities increase with temperature. The correlation equation among heat capacities, entropies, enthalpy changes with temperatures were fitted by quadratic formulas and the corresponding fitting factors (R2) these thermodynamic properties are respectively. The correlations plot of those shown in Fig. 17. The thermodynamic correlation fitting equation is follows: Moreover, the thermodynamic properties indicate that the curcumin molecule is more reactive and more polar. The correlation graph for zero (monomer and dimer) applied EFs are shown in Fig. 17 and the corresponding fitting equations are as follows:

Table 10

Thermodynamic properties at different temperatures at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) level for curcumin

T(K) (Sm0)(J mol k)-1 (Cp, m0)(J mol-1k) (Hm0)(kJ mol-1)
0.00 VÅ-1 0.01 VÅ-1 0.02 VÅ-1 Dimer 0.00 VÅ-1 0.01 VÅ-1 0.02 VÅ-1 Dimer 0.00 VÅ-1 0.01 VÅ-1 0.02 VÅ-1 Dimer
100.00 270.12 269.90 276.76 419.15 50.50 47.83 56.71 138.29 3.92 2.70 4.98 9.91
200.00 316.45 306.76 332.99 513.76 90.18 83.70 101.72 199.91 10.83 09.83 13.88 26.72
298.15 361.00 353.23 369.12 622.09 136.12 130.66 144.73 271.57 21.93 19.64 25.91 49.81
300.00 361.84 354.99 371.00 655.34 136.98 132.39 147.49 270.96 22.18 20.89 26.77 50.31
400.00 407.34 399.12 415.23 711.89 180.33 176.25 187.15 341.65 38.10 37.90 42.90 81.30
500.00 451.56 444.65 461.78 809.44 216.02 210.90 222.20 403.09 57.98 56.61 62.58 115.13
600.00 493.54 485.22 502.18 871.40 244.15 237.43 249.59 459.36 81.05 79.23 85.12 160.74
700.00 532.90 529.13 544.67 969.48 266.30 257.21 273.72 500.80 106.62 102.26 109.92 219.07
800.00 569.66 553.90 586.61 1060.12 284.04 276.75 289.94 531.49 134.16 130.08 136.03 260.24

Fig. 17

Correlation graphic of entropy, enthalpy and heat capacity with various temperature of Curcumin

6 Conclusion

The stabilities of the curcumin are analysed by PES scan. The vibrational frequencies of the fundamental modes of the compound are precisely assigned and analysed and the theoretical results are compared with the experimental frequencies. The energies of important MO's, absorption wavelength, oscillator strength and excitation energies of the compound are also determined from TDDFT method and compared with the experimental values. The electric field influence is noticed in HOMO-LUMO gaps of curcumin. The HOMO-LUMO gap extensively decreases from 0.06853 eV to 0.0345 eV for curcumin, respectively as the electric field increases. The first hyperpolarizabilities of curcumin are 3.17 and 3.0450×10-30 esu, respectively. Hα of curcumin was used in NMR in methonal, acetone and actenitrile. The dependence between the rate constant of tautomerisation of curcumin are studied. Photoluminescence has longer wavelength due to the stabilization of the excited states. MEP study shows that the electrophilic attack takes place at the O position of curcumin.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge to HOD, PG & Research Department of Physics, AA Govt Arts College, Villupuram, provided the necessary facility to complete this work.

Declaration

Own fund used in this article. We are not arising any fund from any other agency.

References

  1. 1.
    P.R. Holt, S. Katz, R. Kirshoff, Dig. Dis. Sci. 50, 2191-2193 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Shishodia, G. Sethi, B.B. Aggarwal, Ann N Y Acad. Sci. 1056, 206-217 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.A. Sharma, A.J. Gescher, W.P. Steward, Eur. J. Cancer 41, 1955-1968 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Chainani-Wu, Safety and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Curcumin (J. Altern. Complement, Med, 2003) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Chandra, S.S. Gupta, Indian J. Med. Res. 60, 138-140 (1972) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O.A. Hamed, N. Mehdawi, A.A. Taha, Iran J. Pharm. Res. 12, 47 (2013) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Iqbal, S.D. Sharma, Y. Okazaki, M. Fujisawa, S. Okada, Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1, 92 (2003) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.L. Kuo, T.S. Huang, J.K. Lin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2, 1317 (1996) PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Sreejayan, M.N.A. Rao, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 46, 1013-1016 (1994) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Subramanian, N. Sreejayan, M.N.A. Rao, T.D.A. Devasagayam, B.B. Singh, Mutat Res. 311, 249-255 (1994) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.A. Azuine, V. Bhide, Nutr. Cancer. 17(1), 77-83 (1992) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.H. Leu, M.C. Maa, Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Canceer Agents 2, 357-370 (2000) PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Fadda, F. Badria, K. El-Attar, Med. Chem. Res. 19, 413-430 (2010) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.M. Al-Hujaily, A.G. Mohamed, I. Al-Sharif, et al, Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 128, 97-107 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Kostova, T. Albena, T. Paul, Carcinogenesis 20, 911-919 (1999) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Wilken, M.S. Veena, M.B. Wang, E.S. Srivatsan, Mol. Cancer 10, 1-19 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.E. Shchavlev, A.N. Pankratov, V.B. Borodulin, O.A. Chaplygina, J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 10982-10996 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648-5652 (1993) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Cecily Mary Glory, R. Madivanane, K. Sambathkumar, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 55, 638-648 (2017) PubMed Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.A. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. 126, 1977-1979 (1962) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Stuyven, Q. Chen, W.V.D. Moortel, H. Lipkens, B. Caerts, A. Aerts, L. Giebeler, B.V. Eerdenbrugh, P. Augustijns, G.V.D. Mooter, J.V. Humbeeck, J. Vanacken, V.V. Moshchalkov, J. Vermant, J.A. Martens, Chem. Commun. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1039/B816171B PubMed Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R.M. Cornell, U. Schwertmann, Crystal Structure, The Iron Oxides. (New York: Wiley, 2004), pp. 9-38. PubMed Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.M. Cornell, U. Schwertmann, Electronic, Electrical and Magnetic Properties and Colour, The Iron Oxides. (New York: Wiley, 2004), pp. 111-137. PubMed Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Lee, S. Zhang, S. Sun, Chem. Mater. 25, 1293-1304 (2013) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. Cai, J. Wan, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 305, 366-370 (2007) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Wen, H. Yin, W. Li, K. Li, Acta Cryst. E 65, o2623 (2009) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Sambathkumar, Density Functional Theory Studies of Vibrational Spectra, Homo-Lumo, Nbo and Nlo Analysis of Some Cyclic and Heterocyclic Compounds (Ph.D thesis), Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, August 2014 PubMed Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd edn. (New York: Springer, 2006). PubMed Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H.O. Kalinowski, S. Berger, S. Braun, Carbon-13 NMR Spectroscopy. (Chichester: Wiley, 1988). PubMed Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    K. Pihlaja, E. Kleinpeter, Carbon-13 Chemical Shifts in Structural and Sterochemical Analysis. (Deerfield Beach: VCH Publishers, 1994). PubMed Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Sambathkumar, S. Jeyavijayan, M. Arivazhagan, Spectrochim. Acta A 147, 124-138 (2015) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. Cecily Mary Glory, K. Sambathkumar, R. Madivanane, G. Velmurugan, R. Gayathri, S. Nithiyanantham, M. Venkatachalapathy, N. Rajkamal, J. Mol. Structure 1163, 480-495 (2018) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M.J. Frisc, G.W. Trucks, Schlegal H.B., et al, GAUSSIAN 09, Revision A.02. (Wallingford CT: Gaussian Inc., 2009). PubMed Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Dennington, T. Keith, J. Millam, GaussView, Version 4.1. (Shawnee Mission: Semichem Inc., 2007). PubMed Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. Latha, P. Kumaresan, S. Nithiyanantham, K. Sambathkumar, J. Mol. Struct. 1152, 351-360 (2018) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    K. Sambathkumar, S. Nithiyanantham, J. Mater. Sci. 28, 6529-6543 (2017) PubMed Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    K. Sambathkumar, Spectrochim. Acta A 147, 51-66 (2015) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, dis tribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Manimaran
    • 1
  • K. SambathKumar
    • 2
  • R. Gayathri
    • 3
  • K. Raja
    • 4
  • N. Rajkamal
    • 5
  • M. Venkatachalapathy
    • 5
  • G. Ravichandran
    • 6
  • C. Lourdu EdisonRaj
    • 6
  •     
  1. 1. P. G & Research Department of Physics, Thanthai Hans Roever College(Autonomous), Perambalur, Tamil Nadu 621220, India
  2. 2. Post Graduate and Research Department of Physics, (NANO Science Divisions), A. A. Govt. Arts College, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu 605602, India
  3. 3. Post Graduate and Research Department of Physics, Cauvery College for Women, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
  4. 4. Post Graduate and Research Department of Physics, Dr. R. K. Shanmugam College of Arts & Science, Kallakurichi, Tamil Nadu 606213, India
  5. 5. Post Graduate and Research Department of Physics, Thiru. A. Govindasamy Govt Arts College, Tindivanam, Tamil Nadu 604002, India
  6. 6. Post Graduate and Research Department of Chemistry, A. A. Govt. Arts College, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu 605602, India