Cipatrijugin G, a new trijugin-type limonoid bearing an uncommon γ-hydroxybutenolide unit from the aerial parts of Cipadessa cinerascens

  • Cheng-Shi JIANG a,  
  • Yan LI a,  
  • Zhen-Zhong WANG b,  
  • Xiao-Yin HUANG a,  
  • Wei XIAO b,  
  • Yue-Wei GUO a
  •     

Abstract

A new trijugin-type limonoid, cipatrijugin G (1), together with the related known cipatrijugin A (2), were isolated from the aerial parts of Cipadessa cinerascens. The structure of the new compound was determined by extensive analysis of its spectroscopic data and by comparison of its NMR data with those reported in the literature. Compound 1 showed cytotoxicity against tumor cell line A549 with an IC50 value of 9.78 μM. This is the first report of a trijugin-type limonoid bearing a γ-hydroxybutenolide unit, in comparison to the common furan unit as ring E.

Keywords

Cipadessa cinerascens    trijugin-type    limonoid    

Introduction

Plants belonging to family Meliaceae are an abundant source of limonoids, which are a structurally diverse group of natural products, with a highly complex polycyclic skeleton.14 These unusual structural features have attracted great attention as a challenging target for total synthesis, 5, 6 bioactivity evaluation, 7, 8 and biosynthetic studies.9, 10 The genus Cipadessa (Meliaceae) is composed of nine species of shrubs or small tress (up to 5 m tall). C. cinerascens (Pell.) Hand.-Mazz. is a medicinal plant widely distributed in the southwest of mainland China. The leaves and roots of the plant have traditionally been used for the treatment of rheumatism, malaria, scalds, and skin itches.11 Previous phytochemical investigations of C. cinerascens led to the isolation of a series of limonoids, some of which showed various biological activities, including cytotoxicity, insecticidal, and trypanocidal activities.1, 12

In the course of our ongoing project searching for bioactive secondary metabolites from Chinese medicinal plants,1317 with Cipadessa cinerascens was recently collected from Guangxi Zhuang Automomous Region, China. A chemical investigation of the aerial parts of the plant has resulted in the isolation of a new trijugin-type limonoid, named cipatrijugin G (1), together with a related known compound cipatrijugin A (2)18 (Figure 1). In this paper, we report the isolation and structure elucidation of the new compound 1.

Fig. 1

Chemical structures of compounds 1 and 2

Results and Discussion

The air-dried powdered aerial parts (2.5 kg) of C. cinerascens were extracted using MeOH at room temperature. The MeOH extract was partitioned between a CHCl3 and H2O phase. The CHCl3-soluble phase was separated using silica gel column to obtain twelve fractions, named A–L. Fraction I was repeatedly chromatographed over silica gel, and Sephadex LH-20 columns to isolate compounds 1 and 2.

The known compound 2 was readily identified as cipatrijugin A by comparison of its spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature.18 Moreover, cipatrijugin G (1) was obtained as a white powder. The molecular formula, C31H38O13, was determined using HRESIMS from the quasimolecular ion peak at m/z 641.2205 [M + Na]+ (calcd 641.2210), suggesting the presence of thirteen degrees of unsaturation. The IR spectrum showed the absorptions indicative of hydroxyl (3442 cm–1) and ester (1742 cm–1) and unsaturated carbonyl (1686 cm–1) functionalities. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 1 (Table 1) exhibited resonances for two acetyl groups (δH 2.05, 6H; δC 20.7, 20.2, 170.3, 170.9), four quaternary methyl (δH 0.91, 1.08, 0.78, 1.05; δC 17.7, 19.1, 27.2, 22.6), one carbomethoxy (δH 3.68; δC 52.6, 176.2), one exo-cyclic double bond (δH 5.50, 5.25; δC 115.8, 142.7), one ketonic carbonyl (δC 208.5), one ring-D lactone, one hemiactal group (δH 6.18, δC 96.1), and four further oxygen-bearing methines (δH 4.19, 5.15, 5.22, 6.48; δC 65.3, 73.7, 74.1, 78.4). The aforementioned spectroscopic features and comparison with co-occurring cipatrijugin A (2)18 strongly suggested that 1 was a limonoid with trijugin-type skeleton. In fact, the 1H and 13C NMR data of 1 are very similar to those of compound 2 in rings B, C, and D, and mainly differed from those of 2 for C-20, C-21, C-22 and C-23 in ring E by the presence of a γ-hydroxybutenolide unit (instead of a furan unit), as well as an additional acetoxyl group at C-2 in ring A. Although there is no detected HMBC correlation from H-2 to the acetyl carbonyl carbon in OAc-2, the location of acetoxyl group at C-2 in ring A can be deduced by the remarkable downfield shifts of H-2 (δ 5.22) and C-2 (δ 65.3), and 1H-1H COSY correlations of H-2 (5.22, t, J = 3.3 Hz)/H-1 (4.19, d, J = 3.3 Hz), and H-2 (5.22, t, J = 3.3 Hz)/H-3 (5.15, d, J = 3.6 Hz). The γ-hydroxybutenolide unit for ring E could be confirmed by diagnostic HMBC correlations of H-21/C-22/C-23, and H-22/C-20/C-23. Furthermore, the 21-hydroxy-20(22)-ene-21, 23-γ-lactone moiety was unambiguously secured by comparison of the 13C NMR data with those of the corresponding part of the model compound turrapubesin G, a natural product previously isolated from Turraea pubescens.19 The HMBC correlations of H-22/C-17 and H-17/C-20 clearly indicated a linkage between rings D and E. Finally, comprehensive analysis of the 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra (Figure 2) allowed to assign all the chemical shifts in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra (Table 1) of 1.

Table 1

1H and 13C NMR data for compounds 1a and 2b (J in Hz)

1 2
position δH δC δH δC
1 4.19, d, (3.3) 73.7 (d) 4.16, t, (2.5) 71.6
2α 5.22, t, (3.3) 65.3 (d) 2.19, dt, (16.0, 2.5) 29.6
2β 1.91, dt, (16.0, 2.5)
3 5.15, d, (3.6) 74.1 (d) 4.79, t, (2.5) 74.7
4 39.3 (s) 38.3
5 2.90, overlapped 37.8 (d) 2.98, t, (4.5) 37.9
6α 2.95, br. d, (4.2) 29.2 (t) 2.90, dd, (18.0, 4.5) 29.6
6β 2.25, br. d, (3.6) 2.27, dd, (18.0, 4.5)
7 176.2 (s) 174.4
8 142.7 (s) 144.5
9 208.5 (s) 210.2
10 56.0 (s) 55.2
11 3.60, dd, (3.3, 9.3) 58.3 (d) 3.52, dd, (4.0, 10.0) 58.6
12α 1.85, m 35.3 (t) 1.70, dd, (14.0, 10.0) 35.7
12β 2.80, overlapped 2.81, dd, (14.0, 4.0)
13 45.5 (s) 46.0
14 87.6 (s) 87.5
15α 2.88, overlapped 33.7 (t) 2.79, m 34.5
15β 2.80, overlapped 2.79, m
16 167.5 (s) 170.7
17 6.48, s 78.4 (d) 6.41, s 79.3
18 0.91, s 17.7 (q) 0.78, s 17.5
19 1.08, s 19.1 (q) 1.02, s 19.9
20 164.1 (s) 121.9
21 6.18, br. s 96.1 (d) 7.55, s 143.5
22 6.31, s 119.9 (d) 6.46, br. s 108.6
23 169.2 (s) 7.44, br. s 139.8
28 0.78, s 27.2 (q) 0.87, s 27.5
29 1.05, s 22.6 (q) 0.95, s 22.9
30α 5.50, s 115.8 (t) 5.37, br. s 114.1
30β 5.25, s 5.17, br. s
Ac-2 2.05, s 20.7 (q)
170.3 (s)
Ac-3 2.05, s 20.2 (q) 2.04, s 20.8
170.9 (s) 168.8
OCH3 3.68, s 52.6 (q) 3.66, s 51.7
a1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz); Chemical Shits (ppm) referred to CDCl3 (δH 7.26, δC 77.0, ).b1H and 13C NMR data of 2 from ref. 18.

Fig. 2

Selected 1H-1H COSY, HMBC, andROESY correlations for 1

The relative configurations for ring junction centers of 1 were suggested to be the same as those of co-occurring 2 based on similar 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts and biogenetic consideration. Further, the relative configurations for C-2 and C-17 were determined by ROESY experiment.Thus, the relative configuration of C-2 was established by the clear NOE cross peak of H-2 (δH 5.22)/Me-19 (δH 1.08), suggesting the β-orientation for acetoxyl group at C-2. The β-orientation of H-17 was indicated by the NOE correlation of Hβ-12 (δH 2.80)/H-17 (δH 6.48), consequently establishing the β-orientation for γ-hydroxybutenolide ring at C-17. Thus, the relative structure of 1 was demonstrated as depicted in Figure 2.

Compounds 1 and 2 were tested for in vitro cytotoxicity against tumor cell lines A549 and HL60. The results indicated that compound 1 showed strong cytotoxicity against A549 with an IC50 value of 9.78 µM and no inhibition on HL60.

Trijugin-type limonoids are of particular interest due to their complicated structures and promising activities. Since their first isolation in 1987, 20 about 21 analogues had been reported to date according to the literature survey. However, to the best of our knowledge, cipatrijugin G(1) presents the first example of trijugin-type limonoids bearing a γ-hydroxybutenolide unit, instead of the common furan unit as ring E. The discovery of 1 is an important addition to a diverse and complex array in the rapidly expanding class of known trijugin-type limonoids. Further studies should be conducted to prove the biosynthetic origin of these compounds and to understand their real ecological roles played in the life cycle of the plant, as well as to confirm their absolute configuration by total synthesis.

Experimental Section

General Experimental Procedures.Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer 341 polarimeter. IR spectrum was recorded on a Nicolet Magna FT-IR 750 spectrometer. NMR spectra were measured on a Varian Mercury-400 spectrometer with the residual CDCl3 (δH 7.26 ppm; δC 77.01 ppm) as an internal standard. EIMS and HREIMS spectra were recorded on a Q-TOF Micro LC-MS mass spectrometer. All solvents were of analytical grade (Shanghai Chemical Plant, Shanghai, China). Commercial silica gel (Qing Dao Hai Yang Chemical Group Co., 200–300 and 400–600 mesh) was used for column chromatography, and precoated SiO2 gel plates (Yan Tai Zi Fu Chemical Group Co., G60 F-254) were used for analytical TLC. Sephadex LH-20 gel (Amersham Biosciences) was also used for column chromatography.

Plant Material.The aerial parts of C. cinerascens were collected in Guangxi Zhuang Automomous Region, China, in July, 2008 and were identified by Jin-Gui Shen from Shanghai Institute of Material Medica. A voucher specimen is deposited at SIMM (voucher number JGL).

Extraction and Isolation.The air-dried, powdered aerial parts of C. cinerascens (2.5 kg) were extracted by exhaustive maceration in MeOH (3 × 5 L, for one week) at room temp. The extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 297.7 g of dried residues, respectively. The MeOH extract was partitioned successively between CHCl3 and H2O to give CHCl3 extract (30.1 g). The CHCl3 residue was fractionated by gradient silica gel column chromatography (CC) eluting with a step gradient (0–100% EtOAc in light petroleum ether) to yield twelve fractions A–L. Fraction I was chromatographed by gradient Si gel CC (light petroleum ether/CHCl3, from 9:1 to 3:7, followed by CHCl3/MeOH, from 9:1 to 8:2) and further purify by Sephadex LH20 (light petroleum ether/CHCl3/MeOH, 2:1:1) to give compound 1 (3.2 mg) and 2 (8.0 mg).

Cipatrijugin G (1):white powder; [α]D25 + 4 (c 0.3, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax 3442, 2926, 2852, 1742, 1686, 1439, 1379 1250, 1032 cm–1; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; ESIMS m/z 641.2 [M + Na]+; positive ion HRESIMS: m/z 641.2205 (calcd for C31H38O13Na, 641.2210).

Cytotoxicity Assay.Compounds 1 and 2 were evaluated for their cytotoxicity against human tumor cell line A549 by the MTT21 method as previously reported.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13659-013-0074-z and is accessible for authorized users.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work was financially supported by the National Marine '863' Projects (No. 2013AA092902), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21021063, 81273430, and 2107224), and was partially funded by the EU 7th Framework Programme-IRSES Project (No. 246987).

References

  1. 1.
    Q. G. Tan, X. D. Luo, Chem. Rev. 111, 7437-7522 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Yin, X. N. Wang, C. Q. Fan, S. G. Liao, J. M. Yue, Org. Lett. 9, 2353-2356 (2007) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. A. Mulholland, B. Parel, P. H. Coombes, Curr. Org. Chem. 4, 1011-1054 (2000) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor, D. A. H. In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, ed. W. Herz, H. Grisebachand G. W. Kirby, Springer, New York, 1984, Vol. 45, pp. 1-102; PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. J. Corey, Reid J. Gregory, A. G. Myers, R. W. Hahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 918-919 (1987) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Schuster, R. Martinez, H. Bruss, A. P. Antonchick, M. Kaiser, M. Schürmann, H. Waldmann, Chem. Commun. 47, 6545-6547 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Kavitha, Vidya, R. Priyadarsini, P. Anitha, K. Ramalingam, R. Sakthivel, G. Purushothaman, A. K. Singh, D. Karunagaran, S. Nagini, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 681, 6-14 (2012) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Roy, S. Saraf, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 29, 191-201 (2006) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakatani, M. In Bioactive Compounds from Natural Sources, ed. C. Tringali, Taylor & Francis, London, U. K., 2001, ch. 13, pp. 527-554. PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. M. K. Wijeratne, B. M. R. Bandara, A. A. L. Gunatilaka, Y. Tezuka, T. Kikuchi, J. Nat. Prod. 55, 1261-1269 (1992) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Editorial Committee (over 300 members) of the Administration Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine. In Chinese Materia Medica (Zhonghua Benchao); Shanghai Science & Technology Press: Shanghai, 1998; Vol. 5, pp 32-33. PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. K. Bandi, D. U. Lee, Chem. Biodivers. 9, 1403-1421 (2012) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    X. L. Chen, H. L. Liu, Y. W. Guo, Planta Med. 78, 286-290 (2012) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. R. Wang, H. L. Liu., T. Kurtán, A. Mándi, S. Antus, J. Li, H. Y. Zhang, Y. W. Guo, Org. Biomol. Chem. 26, 7685-7696 (2011) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. L. Chen, H. L. Liu, J. Li, G. R. Xin, Y. W. Guo, Org. Lett. 13, 5032-5035 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. R. Wang, T. Kurtán, A. Mándi, uo G, W. Y, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 5471-5482 (2012) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. Y. Li, P. Chen, H. G. Xu, Y. M. Yang, S. Y. Peng, Z. Z. Zhao, Y. W. Guo, Org. Lett. 9, 477-480 (2007) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. T. Di, H. P. He, H. Y. Liu, P. Yi, Z. Zhang, Y. L. Ren, J. S. Wang, Q. Y. Sun, F. M. Yang, X. Fang, S. L. Li, H. J. Zhua, X. J. Hao, J. Nat. Prod. 70, 1352-1355 (2007) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    X. N. Wang, S. Yin, C. Q. Fan, L. P. Lin, J. Ding, J. M. Yue, Tetrahedron 63, 8234-8241 (2007) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Venkatanarasimhan, A. B. Kundu, A. Patra, Indian J. Chem. 29B, 970 (1978) PubMed Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. S. Jiang, C. G. Huang, B. Feng, J. Li, J. X. Gong, T. Kurtán, Y. W. Guo, Steroids 75, 1153-1163 (2010) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng-Shi JIANG
    • a
  • Yan LI
    • a
  • Zhen-Zhong WANG
    • b
  • Xiao-Yin HUANG
    • a
  • Wei XIAO
    • b
  • Yue-Wei GUO
    • a
  •     
  1. a. State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
  2. b. Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China