Quantitative analysis of trigonelline in some Annona species by proton NMR spectroscopy

  • Alan Rodrigues Teixeira MACHADO ,  
  • Gisele Avelar LAGE ,  
  • Felipe da Silva MEDEIROS ,  
  • José Dias de Souza FILHO ,  
  • Lúcia Pinheiro Santos PIMENTA
  •     

Abstract

A quantitative 1H NMR method (qHNMR) was used to measure the trigonelline content in the leaves of six species of the Annona genus. The methodology employed compared the intensities of the signals at δ 9.14 (H-2) and δ 0.00, the internal standard TSP-d4. This measuring method was able to establish the concentration of trigonelline in the range from 0.67 to 10.04 mg·g-1 depending on the investigated extract.

Keywords

trigonelline    Annona    quantitative 1H NMR    

Introduction

Betaines are derivatives amino acids with quaternary nitrogen atom which are commonly found in a variety of living organisms, such as animals, plant, fungi, bacteria and algae1, 2. Physiologically, these substances have osmotic regulatory properties and can act as a methyl group donor3. Among these mesoionic-type substances, trigonelline (Figure 1) is somewhat unique as it displays hypoglycemic, hypocholesterolemic, antitumoral and anti-septic properties4, 5. Moreover, it is well known that trigonelline plays an important role in the resistance process of plants against several pathogens6.

Fig. 1

Structure of trigonelline

Trigonelline is widely distributed in mainly herbaceous plants of saline dried habitats7, and in particular is isolated from leaves of Trigonella foenum graecum8. In the studies of Moringa oleifera performed by Mantur and Kamal9 using HPLC, different contents (3.55, 2.60, 2.15, 1.90 and 1.60 mg·g–1) were found in the pods, leaves, roots, stems and flowers, respectively. Many analytical techniques were employed for the characterization and identification of trigonelline3, 9. Machado et al.10 observed by NMR spectroscopy a content of 1.20 mg·g–1 of trigonelline in Coffea Arabica roots. NMR in particular, is a non-targeted analytical technique where there is no need for previous separations, derivates and even purification with processes being quick and efficient and capable to simultaneously detect a large amount of metabolites in only one analysis11.

The genus Annona has a great commercial importance because it comprises from a large variety of edible fruits. It is noteworthy to mention that the utilization of several species of this genus in popular medicine is due to its diverse pharmacological properties such as its anti-parasitic, anti-ulcer, antidiarrheal and anti-spasmodic amongst other therapeutic actions12. This work herein describes the identification and the quantification of trigonelline in the extracts of various Annona species by proton NMR spectroscopy in one and two dimensional experiments.

Results and Discussion

The proton signals of trigonelline were promptly assigned in all spectra mainly due to their special chemical shifts in the 8.00 to 10.00 ppm region. Figure 2 illustrates one of the various proton NMR spectra obtained for the extracts with the appropriate assignments that were supported by COSY experiments that exhibited the correlations between H-5 to H-4 and H-6.

Fig. 2

Proton NMR spectrum of the Annona sylvatica extract leaves (400 MHz, methanol-d4/buffer solution in D2O). The inset shows the expansion from the 1H-1H COSY spectrum.

Generally, the methods described in literature for quantitative analysis by NMR were not performed to determine the longitudinal relaxation time of the trigonelline and TSP-d4 hydrogens. These measurements were crucial to the establishment of the recuperation delay (d1) which were important to the veracity of the integral of each signal13. This delay was set to 5 * longest T1 for the return to the Boltzman equilibrium where all liquid magnetizations were reestablished. Therefore, the usual inversion-recovery experiment was applied to determine the T1 values for the hydrogens involved in the quantification (H-2 of trigonelline and methyl group of TSP-d4) (Figure 3). The T1 values of H-2 and methyl hydrogens were 3.06 and 4.05 s, respectively. Thus the value of the recuperation delay (d1) was set to 21s to ensure complete relaxation.

Fig. 3

Longitudinal relaxation times for (a) TSP-d4 and (b) H-2 of trigonelline

Table 1 contains the results of this quantification and it can be seen that Annona laurifolia has one with the highest amount of trigonelline (i.e. 10.04 mg·g–1). This amount of trigonelline can be compared to one of the main natural sources which is Trigonella foenum graecum L., where this metabolite is found at the concentration of 13.3 mg·g–114.This species may be an alternative source of this compound.

Table 1

Trigonelline concentrations in the leaves of Annona species

Plant Concentration/mg·g-1*
Annona muricata 0.67 ±0.04
Annona laurifolia 10.04 ±0.40
Annona dolabripetala 4.94 ± 0.25
Annona sylvatica 6.56 ± 0.04
Annona cherimolia 5.65 ± 0.27
Annona coriacea 2.11 ±0.36
*mg per gram of dry weight

In conclusion, the present investigation involved the identification and quantification of trigonelline in leaves of A. muricata, A. laurifolia, A. dolabripetala, A. sylvatica, A. cherimolia and A. coriacea. The efficacy of NMR spectroscopy as an analytical tool has been, once more demonstrated, with its peculiarities, i.e., non-targeted, non-expensive and non-time consuming methodology.

Experimental Section

Vegetable Material. Six species of Annona were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Botanical identification was performed by João Renato Stehmann of the Departamento de Botânica do Instituto de Ciências Biológicas of Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Sample Generic Preparation. Extracts were prepared according to methodology reported by Kim et al.15 In the triplicate extractions, 50 mg of leaves were submitted to the extraction by a mixture of methanol-d4 (0.75 mL) and a buffer solution (0.75 mL) of KH2PO4 in D2O (90 mM, pH = 6.0) containing TSP-d4 0.01%. The extraction was conducted by 1 minute vortex stirring followed by 20 minutes sonication and finally, centrifugation. Next, 0.8 mL of the supernatant was transferred to 5 mm NMR tubes.

NMR Experiments. NMR experiments were recorded in a Bruker Avance DRX400 (9.4 Tesla) equipped with an inverse multinuclear 5 mm probehead at 303 K. Firstly, the proton longitudinal relaxation times (T1) were determined for the methyl hydrogens of TSP-d4 and H-2 of trigonelline by the inversion-recovery method for optimization of the recuperation delay, d113. The 64k data points proton NMR spectra were acquired twice for each sample using 16 ppm sweep width. The pulse program 'zgcppr' was the best choice for the water suppression and the 0.3 Hz line broadening were applied for the Fourier transform. The phase and baseline corrections were performed and the TSP-d4 signal calibrated at 0.00 ppm. To ensure the H-2 chemical shift assignment 1H NMR spectra besides homonuclear correlation spectroscopy (COSY) were recorded after addition of standard trigonelline to the selected extracts.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank FAPEMIG for their financial support and CAPES for the fellowship of ARTM.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Blunden, A. L. Cripps, S. M. Gordon, T. G. Mason, C. H. Turner, Bot. Mar. 29, 155-160 (1986) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Blunden, A. V. Patel, Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 33, 904-920 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Rochfort, A. J. Parker, F. R. Dunshea, Phytochemistry 69, 299-322 (2008) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. I. Corol, C. Ravel, M. Raksegi, Z. Bedo, G. Charmet, M. H. Beale, P. R. Shewry, J. L. Ward, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 5471-5481 (2012) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Sánchez-Hernández, M. Castro-Puyana, C. García-Ruiz, A. L. Crego, M. L. Marina, J. Agric. Food Chem. 120, 921-928 (2010) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Tyihak, A. R. T. Sarhan, N. T. Cong, B. Barna, Z. Kiraly, Plant Soil 109, 285-287 (1988) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Dini, G. C. Tenore, E. Trimarco, A. Dini, Food Chem. 98, 209-213 (2005) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Johns, Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 18, 2518-2523 (1985) PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Mathur, R. Kamal, Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 22, 994-1001 (2012) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. R. T. Machado, V. A. C. Campos, W. R. J. Silva, V. P. Campos, A. C. M. Zeri, D. F. Oliveira, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 134, 431-441 (2012) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. S. Wishart, Trends Food Sci. Tech. 19, 482-493 (2010) PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. S. Barbalho, R. Alvares Goularto, F. M. V. Farinazzi-Machado, M. S. S. Souza, Bueno P. C. S. Cincotto, E. L. Guiguer, A. C. Araujo, M.. Groppo, Curr. Bioact. Compd. 8, 277-286 (2012) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Pieri, A. Belancic, S. Morales, H. Stuppner, J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 4378-4384 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Satheeshkumar, P. K. Mukherjee, S. Bhadra, B. P. Saha, Phytomedicine 17, 292-295 (2010) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. K. Kim, Y. A. Choi, R. Verpoorte, Nat. Protoc. 5, 36-49 (2010) PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Rodrigues Teixeira MACHADO
  • Gisele Avelar LAGE
  • Felipe da Silva MEDEIROS
  • José Dias de Souza FILHO
  • Lúcia Pinheiro Santos PIMENTA
  •     
    Departamento de Química, ICEx, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brasil