Unusual illudin-type sesquiterpenoids from cultures of Agrocybe salicacola

  • Liang-Yan LIU a,b,  
  • Ling ZHANG a,  
  • Tao FENG a,  
  • Zheng-Hui LI a,  
  • Ze-Jun DONG a,  
  • Xing-Yao LI a,b,  
  • Jia SU a,b,  
  • Yan LI a,  
  • Ji-Kai LIU a
  •     

Abstract

Seven new illudin-type sesquiterpenoids, agrocybins A-G(1-7), along with three known analogues(8-10), have been isolated from the culture broth of the fungus Agrocybe salicacola. Their structures were elucidated on the basis of extensive spectroscopic data analysis and comparison with data reported in the literature. The relative stereoconfigurations of 1 and 6 were elucidated by the X-ray crystallographic diffraction analysis. Compound 1 was highly cyclized containing seven chiral carbons which arranged compactly in six rings.

Keywords

Agrocybe salicacola    sesquiterpenoid    agrocybin    stereoconfiguration    X-ray    

Introduction

The genus Agrocybe contains 174 species and varietas, and has been reported to produce rich bioactive metabolites such as ceramides, indole alkaloids, peptides, lectin, and polysaccharides, with inhibitory activity against COX-1 and COX-2, free radical scavenging ability, antifungal activity, mitogenic effect, and hypoglycemic function.1-5 Agrocybe salicacola (Chinese name, Yang-Liu-Tian-Tou-Gu) is a delicate edible mushroom endemic to Yunnan province, People's Republic of China, which grows at trunks of poplars and willows from September to October.6-7 Our previous investigation on the cultures of this fungus revealed a novel illudane-illudane bissesquiterpene (agrocybone) and an illudin derivative.8, 9 Surveys on the literature, we found that illudin-type sesquiterpenoids may play an important role on the antitumor property.10 For instance, irofulven, a derivative of natural occuring illudin S from the fruiting bodies or culture broth of several species in basidiomycetes, 11 has been admitted to clinical trails for the treatment of cancers.12-14 In order to search for more illudintype sesquiterpenoids, especially ones with high cytotoxicity, we enlarged the scale of fermentation of A. salicacola, and isolated seven new illudin-type sesquiterpenoids, named as agrocybins A–G (1–7), together with three known analogues. The new structures were determined on the basis of extensive spectroscopic analysis and the X-ray crystallographic diffraction analysis, while the known compounds were identified as (2R)-2, 3-dihydro-7-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-2, 4, 6-trimethyl-1H-indene-5-ethanol (8), 15 illudin T (9), 9 and agrocybone (10)8 by comparison with data reported in the literature. Compounds 1–10 were tested for their cytotoxic activity. All these compounds showed no cytotoxic activity against human tumor cell lines HL-60, SMMC-7712, A-549, MCF-7, and SW480 in vitro.

Results and Discussion

Compound 1 was obtained as colorless needles. The IR spectrum displayed an absorption band at 3425 cm−1 due to the hydroxy group. The positive HRESIMS showed a pseudo molecular ion at m/z 287.1251 ([M + Na]+), corresponding to the molecular formula C15H20O4 that required six degrees of unsaturation. Inspection of the 1H and 13C NMR (DEPT) and HSQC spectra revealed the existence of two methyl groups, five methylene groups (including an oxymethylene), three methenyl units (including an acetal unit) and five quaternary carbons (two of them are oxygen-bearing ones) (Tables 1 and 2). These data suggested that 1 might be a six-ring sesquiterpenoid.

Table 1

13C NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 1–7.

Position 1a 2b 3c 4d 5d 6c 7b
1 78.1, CH 75.8, CH 74.4, CH 186.3, C 186.1, C 200.2, C 187.0, C
2 49.9, CH 46.8, CH 46.3, CH 132.9, C 134.5, C 130.4, C 132.2, C
3 27.6, C 26.6, C 26.5, C 163.4, C 160.1, C 157.3, C 158.6, C
4 88.6, C 129.2, C 124.2, C 74.2, C 75.4, C 70.3, C 75.3, C
5 77.6, C 142.3, C 145.7, C 54.2, CH 54.4, CH 52.7, CH 55.7, CH
6 38.6, CH2 44.7, CH2 44.8, CH2 39.7, CH2 39.6, CH2 44.7, CH2 40.7, CH2
7 37.8, C 38.2, C 37.7, C 45.1, C 45.2, C 38.0, C 46.2, C
8 41.6, CH2 46.6, CH2 46.5, CH2 147.8, CH 148.0, CH 42.3, CH2 149.8, CH
9 84.7, C 44.7, CH 44.8, CH 137.1, C 136.8, C 49.1, CH 138.4, C
10 103.9, CH 11.4, CH3 11.4, CH3 11.5, CH3 12.0, CH3 94.6, CH 57.8, CH2
11 5.3, CH2 14.9, CH2 14.3, CH2 30.5, CH2 28.9, CH2 25.5, CH2 64.4, CH
12 6.4, CH2 10.0, CH2 9.5, CH2 61.5, CH2 63.5, CH2 57.3, CH2 94.3, CH
13 11.6, CH3 58.0, CH2 59.5, CH2 22.7, CH3 22.3, CH3 24.9, CH3 22.2, CH3
14 78.5, CH2 30.2, CH3 30.3, CH3 27.7, CH3 21.8, CH3 31.8, CH3 27.8, CH3
15 21.6, CH3 31.1, CH3 30.8, CH3 28.5, CH3 28.6, CH3 31.9, CH3 28.7, CH3
HCO 161.9, CH
CH3CO 21.0, CH3
CH3CO 171.5, C
OCH3 55.9, CH3
a spectra were measured in CDCl3 at 125 MHz; b spectra were measured in acetone-d6 at 125 MHz;
cspectra were measured in methanol-d4 at 100 MHz; d spectra were measured in CDCl3 at 100 MHz.

Table 2

1H NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 1–3.

Pos. 1a 2b 3c
1 3.64, d (6.4) 3.68, dd (9.7, 3.9) 3.71, m
2 2.37, m 1.15, m 1.16, m
6a 1.85, d (12.7) 2.27, m 2.27, d (17.0)
6b 1.39, d (12.7) 2.21, d (17.0)
8a 2.43, d (9.8) 1.89, dd (11.8, 7.1) 1.91, dd (11.8, 7.4)
8b 1.34, d (9.8) 1.17, dd (11.8, 11.5) 1.18, m
9 2.70, m 2.72, m
10 5.68, d (2.9) 0.97, d (6.8) 0.95, d (6.9)
11a 0.68, m 0.69, m 0.68, m
11b 0.07, m 0.40, m 0.44, m
12a 1.28, m 0.98, m 0.86, m
12b 0.76, m 0.59, m 0.59, m
13a 0.95, s 3.78, d (11.5) 4.40, d (12.0)
13b 3.51, d (11.5) 4.12, d (12.0)
14 3.43, s 1.08, s 1.06, s
15 1.05, s 1.08, s 1.06, s
HCO 8.09, s
aspectra were measured in CDCl3 at 500 MHz;
bspectra were measured in acetone-d6 at 400 MHz;
cspectra were measured in methanol-d4 at 500 MHz.

In the 13C NMR data, three characteristic signals at δC 27.6 (s, C-3), 5.3 (t, C-11), and 6.4 (t, C-12) revealed the existence of a three-membered carbon skeleton (ring A).8, 9 These information, along with the characteristic quaternary carbon resonance at δC 37.8 (s, C-7) and four methyl groups (including two oxidated ones) led to the hypothesis that compound 1 might be an illudin-type sesquiterpenoid possessing a 3/6/5 carbon skeleton (rings A–C as shown in Figure 1) as those reported previously from the same resource.8, 9 Detailed analysis of 1H-1H COSY and HMBC spectra supported the above hypothesis (Figure 1). Further, the proton of an acetal signal at δH 5.68 (1H, d, J = 2.9 Hz, H-10) showed key HMBC correlations to two oxyquaternary carbon signals at δC 88.6 (s, C-4) and 84.7 (s, C-9), which established two five-membered rings D and E (Figure 1). In addition, the HMBC correlation of the proton of an oxymethine at δH 3.64 (1H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-1) to the oxymethylene carbon at δC 78.5 (t, C-14) established ring F as shown in Figure 1. To the best of our knowledge, compound 1 was the first highly cyclized illudin-type sesquiterpenoid. Construction of a molecular model of 1 suggested that a six-ring system made the backbone compact. An X-ray diffraction analysis of 1 not only confirmed the structure as elucidated above but also established the relative configuration as shown in Figure 1. Thus, compound 1 was established and named as agrocybin A.

Fig. 1

Key 2D NMR correlations and the X-ray structure of 1.

Compound 2 was isolated as a colorless oil. Its molecular formula was determined to be C15H24O2 by the pseudo molecular ion at m/z 259.1676 ([M + Na]+) in the HRESIMS. The IR spectrum showed absorption at 3439 cm−1 due to the hydroxy groups. 13C NMR data analysis suggested that 2 was also an illudin-type sesquiterpenoid as deduced from the characteristic signals at δC 26.6 (s, C-3), 14.9 (t, C-11), and 10.0 (t, C-12) for the three-membered carbon ring and the quaternary resonance at δC 38.2 (s, C-7). 2D NMR data analysis indicated that compound 2 was structurally resembled illudane, 16 except for the terminal double bond between C-2 and C-10 becoming saturated in 2, as supported by the HMBC correlation of δH 0.97 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, H-10) with δC 46.8 (d, C-2), 75.8 (d, C-1), and 26.6 (s, C-3). The relative configuration was elucidated by the ROESY experiment. The ROESY correlations of H-1/H-10 and H-10/H-9 suggested that H-9 and Me-10 were on the same side, while OH-1 on the opposite side. Therefore, compound 2 was established and named as agrocybin B.

1H and 13C NMR data (Tables 1 and 2) of compound 3 were closely related to those of 2, except for signals of one additional formyl group [δH 8.09 (1H, s, HCO); δC 161.9 (HCO)], which was supported by the IR absorption band at 1721 cm−1. The formyl group was placed at OH-13 as supported by the HMBC correlation of δH 8.09 (1H, s, HCO) with δC 59.5 (t, C-13). Detailed analysis of 2D NMR data suggested that 3 is the C-13 monoformate of 2. Therefore, compound 3 was elucidated as shown and named as agrocybin C.

Compound 4, a colorless oil, was assigned the molecular formula of C15H22O3 based on the positive HRESIMS at m/z 251.1649 ([M + H]+), accounting for five degrees of unsaturation. Analysis of its 1H and 13C NMR data (Tables 1 and 3) revealed four methyls, three methylenes (one oxygenated), one methine, four olefinic carbons (one of which is protonated), two sp3 quaternary carbons (one oxygenated), and one carbonyl carbon. These data suggested compound 4 to be a dicyclic sesquiterpenoid related to illudalenol17 except for one difference that the double bond between C-5 and C-9 migrated to between C-9 and C-8 in 4, as supported by the HMBC crosspeaks from δH 6.52 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, H-8) to δC 45.1 (s, C-7) and from δH 3.38 (1H, ddd, J = 8.2, 8.0, 2.5 Hz, H-5) to δC 137.1 (s, C-9). The ROESY correlations of H-5/H-6a and H-6b/H-13 suggested that H-5 and OH-4 were on the same side. Therefore, compound 4 was elucidated as shown and named as agrocybin D.

Table 3

1H NMR spectroscopic data (400 MHz) for compounds 4–7.

Position 4a 5a 6b 7b
5 3.38, ddd (8.2, 8.0, 2.5) 3.34, dd (8.1, 2.6) 2.59, m 3.55, dd (8.3, 2.7)
6a 1.97, dd (13.3, 8.0) 1.97, dd (13.3, 5.2) 1.55, m 2.00, dd (13.4, 8.3)
6b 1.82, dd (13.3, 8.2) 1.83, dd (13.3, 5.2) 1.11, m 1.86, dd (13.4, 8.3)
8a 6.52, d (2.5) 6.52, d (2.6) 2.22, dd (13.4, 2.3) 6.53, d (2.7)
8b 1.52, m
9 2.93, m
10a 1.84, s 1.86, s 5.15, s 4.41, d (16.5)
10b 4.20, d (16.5)
11a 2.93, ddd (13.3, 11.6, 5.1) 2.77, m 2.34, dd (19.1, 3.5) 4.12, br. s
11b 2.55, ddd (13.3, 3.5, 3.0) 2.46, ddd (19.1, 11.4, 6.0)
12a 4.00, ddd (9.5, 5.1, 3.0) 4.48, dt (10.8, 7.4) 3.81, dd (11.4, 6.0) 5.14, d (1.2)
12b 3.80, ddd (11.6, 9.5, 3.5) 4.21, dt (10.8, 6.9) 3.91, ddd (11.4, 11.4, 3.5)
13 1.11, s 1.13, s 1.27, s 1.15, s
14 1.11, s 1.12, s 0.95, s 1.14, s
15 1.20, s 1.20, s 1.04, s 1.22, s
OCH3 3.40, s
CH3CO 2.04, s
aspectra were measured in CDCl3; bspectra were measured in methanol-d4.

The elemental composition of compound 5 was established as C17H24O4 (six degrees of unsaturation) by HRESIMS. Analysis of its 1D NMR spectroscopic data (Tables 1 and 3) revealed nearly identical structural features to those found in 4, except that the oxygenated methylene protons of CH2-12 at δH 4.00 and 3.80 in 4 were significantly downfield (δH 4.48 and 4.21, respectively) in 5. In addition, NMR signals corresponding to an acetyl group (δH/δC 2.04/21.0, 171.5) were observed, indicating that the C-12 oxygen of 5 was acylated, which was supported by the HMBC correlation from H-12 to the carboxylic carbon at δC 171.5. Consequently, agrocybin E (5) was assigned as the C-12 monoacetate of 4.

Agrocybin F (6) was obtained as colorless needles. Its molecular formula was determined as C16H24O4 on the basis of HRESIMS, implying five degrees of unsaturation. The 13C NMR (DEPT) spectrum revealed the existence of 16 carbon signals, including four methyls (one methoxy group), four methylenes, three methines, and five quaternary carbons (Table 1). Besides one double bond and a carbonyl carbon, these data suggested compound 6 to be a tricyclic sesquiterpenoid. Preliminary analysis of 2D NMR data suggested that rings B and C of 6 were similar to those of 4 and 5 except that the double bond between C-8 and C-9 was saturated (Figure 2). In the HMBC spectrum, an acetal signal at δH 5.15 (1H, s, H-10) showed key correlations to δC 57.3 (t, C-12) and 130.4 (s, C-2), which established a new ring D as shown in Figure 2. In addition, the HMBC cross-peak from methoxy signal at δH 3.40 (3H, s, OCH3) to the acetal carbon indicated the methoxy to be connected at C-10 (Figure 2). An X-ray diffraction assay finally established the structure of 6 and revealed its relative configuration as shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 2

Key 2D NMR correlations and the X-ray structure of 6.

Compound 7, a colorless oil, had a molecular formula of C15H20O5 (six degrees of unsaturation) on the basis of HRESIMS. Analysis of 13C and 1H NMR data (Tables 1 and 3) suggested that 7 possessed rings B and C identical to those of 4 and 5. An oxygenated methylene [δH 4.41 (1H, d, J = 16.5 Hz, H-10a) and 4.20 (1H, d, J = 16.5 Hz, H-10b); δC 57.8] was assigned to C-10 on basis of HMBC correlations from H-10 to C-1, C-2, and C-3, while an oxygenated methine [δH 4.12 (1H, br. s, H-11); δC 64.4] was assigned to C-11 by the HMBC correlations from H-11 to C-2, C-3, and C-4, as well as the 1H-1H COSY correlation from H-11 to the acetal proton at δH 5.14 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-12). The latter showed a key HMBC correlation to C-10, indicating the formation of a new pyran ring based on the ether bond C-12–O–C-10. The relative configuration of 7 was assigned by the ROESY spectrum, in which the correlations of H-5/H-6a, H-6b/H-13, and H-13/H-11 suggested that H-5, OH-4, and OH-11 were on the same side. However, the stereoconfiguration of C-12 could not be determined by the ROESY spectrum. The small coupling constant (3J11, 12 = 1.2 Hz) suggested that H-11 and H-12 should be axial and equatorial oriented, namely that OH-11 and OH-12 were in the opposite side. Accordingly, compound 7 was characterized and named as agrocybin G.

All the isolated compounds were tested for their cytotoxicity against five human cancer cell lines (HL-60, SMMC-7712, A-549, MCF-7, and SW480) by the MTT method, with DDP and taxol as positive controls. Unfortunately, the result showed that none of the compounds exhibited obvious activity at the concentration of 40 μM. Surveys on the literature revealed that the coexistence of a cyclopropane-ring and a leaving group (such as hydroxy) at C-2 or C-4 are necessary for illudins to possess cytotoxicities.18-20 However, all the tested compounds do not meet the above structural features.

Experimental Section

General Experimental Procedures. Melting points were surveyed with an X-4 microscopic melting point meter. Optical rotations were measured on a Horiba SEPA-300 spectropolarimeter. UV spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu doublebeam 210A spectrometer. IR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Tensor 27 FT-IR spectrometer using KBr pellets. NMR spectra were acquired on Bruker DRX-500 and AM-400 instruments at room temperature with TMS as an internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ) were expressed in ppm with reference to the solvent signals. Mass spectra (MS) were recorded on an API QSTAR time-of-flight spectrometer or a VG Autospec-3000 spectrometer. X-ray crystallographic data were collected on a Bruker APEX DUO diffractometer with graphitemonochromated Mo Kα radiation. Silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., China), Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Biosciences, Sweden), and RP-18 gel (40–75 μm, Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd. Japan) were used for column chromatography (CC). Preparative HPLC (Prep-HPLC) was performed on an Agilent 1100 liquid chromatography system equipped with a Zorbax SB-C18 column (9.4 mm × 150 mm). Pre-coated silica gel GF254 plates (Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., China) were used for TLC. Fractions were monitored by TLC, and spots were visualized by heating silica gel plates sprayed with 10% H2SO4 in ethanol.

Fungal Material and Cultivation Conditions. The fungus A. salicacola was collected at the Botanic Garden of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, in spring 2008, and identified by Prof. Mu Zang, Kunming Institute of Botany. The voucher specimen has been deposited in the Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of sciences. The liquid culture medium contained saccharine 5%, yeast powder 0.5%, peptone 0.15%, KH2PO4 0.05%, and MgSO4 0.05%. Inoculums of A. salicacola were prepared in a 15 L-fermentor (Biostar, Shanghai GuoQiang, China) for 6 days under the following conditions: culture temperature 24 ℃, initial pH 6.0, agitation speed 250 r/min, inoculation volume 10% (by volume), and aeration rate 1.0 vvm. Then, the liquid seed was transferred into a 100 L-fermentation tank to be cultivated under the same conditions for 20 days to afford 80 L culture broth.

Extraction and Isolation. The entire culture broth of A.salicacola (80 L) was initially filtered, and the filtrate was extracted three times with EtOAc. The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure to give a crude extract (280 g), and this residue was subjected to CC over silica gel using a petroleum ether-Me2CO gradient (1:0 → 0:1) to afford fractions A-L. Fraction B was subjected to CC over silica gel eluted with a petroleum ether-Me2CO system (20:1) to get 1 (4 mg). Fraction D was first isolated by CC over silica gel (petroleum ether-Me2CO) and Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH), and then purified by Prep-HPLC (MeCN/H2O, 3:7 → 5:5) to give 5 (5.0 mg). Fraction F (65 g) was subjected to CC over silica gel to provide four subfractions (F1–F4). Fraction F2 was first separated by silica gel CC (petroleum ether-Me2CO, 5:1), then purified by Prep-HPLC (MeCN/H2O, 2:8 → 5:5) to afford 2 (4.0 mg), 3 (1.4 mg), 9 (8.0 mg), and 10 (9.0 mg). Compounds 6 (4.0 mg) and 7 (7.0 mg) were obtained from fraction F3 by Prep-HPLC (MeCN/H2O, 2:8 → 4:6). Fraction I (36 g) was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 (CHCl3-MeOH, 1:1), and then purified by the RP-18 CC (MeOH/H2O, 4:6) to yield 4 (5.0 mg). Fraction J (10 g) was subjected to silica gel CC eluted using a CH3Cl-MeOH gradient (15:1 → 5:1), and then purified by Prep-HPLC (MeCN/H2O, 3:7) to afford 8 (12.5 mg).

Agrocybin A (1): colorless needles (acetone); mp 139– 140 ℃; [α]D24 = − 69.0 (c 0.24, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax 3425, 2945, 2837, 1112, 1059, 911 cm−1; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; ESIMS (positive) m/z 287 [M + Na]+; HRESIMS (positive) m/z 287.1251 (calcd. for C15H20O4Na, 287.1259).

Agrocybin B (2): colorless oil; [α]D16 − 14.7 (c 0.38, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax 3439, 1631 cm−1; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; ESIMS (positive) m/z 237 [M + H]+; HRESIMS (positive) m/z 259.1676 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C15H24O2Na, 259.1673).

Agrocybin C (3): colorless oil; [α]D12 − 11.0 (c 0.10, MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax 3431, 2955, 1721, 1632, 1172 cm−1; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; 1H NMR data, see Table 2; ESIMS (positive) m/z 287 [M + Na]+; HRESIMS (positive) m/z 287.1626 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C16H24O3Na, 287.1623).

Agrocybin D (4): colorless oil; [α]D13 − 75.2 (c 0.26, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 286 (3.09), 261 (3.11), 204 (2.98), 194 (2.79) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3423, 2957, 1641, 1625 cm−1; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; 1H NMR data, see Table 3; ESIMS (positive) m/z 251 [M + H]+; HRESIMS (positive) m/z 251.1649 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C15H23O3, 251.1647).

Agrocybin E (5): colorless oil; [α]D21 − 93.4 (c 0.32, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax 3449, 2957, 1742, 1642, 1626, 1238 cm−1; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; 1H NMR data, see Table 3; ESIMS (positive) m/z 315 [M + Na]+; HRESIMS (positive) m/z 315.1566 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C17H24O4Na, 315.1572).

Agrocybin F (6): colorless needles (acetone-methanol); mp 168–169 ℃; [α]D13 + 65.4 (c 0.18, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 233 (3.06) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3465, 2955, 2924, 1656, 1062 cm−1; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; 1H NMR data, see Table 3; ESIMS (positive) m/z 303 [M + Na]+; HRESIMS (positive) m/z 303.1580 [M + Na] + (calcd. for C16H24O4Na, 303.1572).

Agrocybin G (7): colorless oil; [α]D13 − 94.8 (c 0.15, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 207 (3.14), 249 (2.91) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3440, 2957, 2933, 1630 cm−1; 13C NMR data, see Table 1; 1H NMR data, see Table 3; ESIMS (positive) m/z 303 [M + Na]+; HRESIMS (positive) m/z 303.1204 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C15H20O5Na, 303.1208).

Crystallographic Data of Agrocybin A (1): C15H20O4; M = 264.31; trigonal; space group P31; a = b = 12.686 (3) Å, c = 7.2090 (16)Å; α = β = 90°, γ = 120°; V = 1004.8 (4) Å3; Z = 3;ρ = 1.310 g·cm-3; crystal dimensions 0.05×0.07×0.64 mm3; Shelxs97 with a graphite monochromator; Mo Kα radiation. The total number of reflections measured was 14186, of which 3002 were observed, I > 2σ (I); R1 = 0.0408, wR2 = 0.0914. Crystallographic data for agrocybin A (1) has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as deposition number CCDC 842502. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (Tel: +44 (0)1223 762911, e-mail:deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Crystallographic Data of Agrocybin F (6): C16H24O4; M = 280.35; orthorhombic; space group P212121; a = 6.1050(6), b = 13.9122(13), c = 17.2488(16)Å; α = γ = β = 90; V = 1465.0(2)Å3; Z = 4; ρ = 1.271 g·cm-3; crystal dimensions 0.11×0.43×0.87 mm3; Shelxs97 with a graphite monochromator; Mo Kα radiation. The total number of reflections measured was 14233, of which 3436 were observed, I > 2σ (I); R1 = 0.0279, wR2 = 0.0754. Crystallographic data for agrocybin F (6) has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as deposition number CCDC 842503. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (Tel: +44 (0)1223 762911, e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Cytotoxicity Assay. The following human tumor cell lines were used: HL-60, SMMC-7712, A-549, MCF-7, and SW480. All the cells were cultured in RMPI-1640 or DMEM medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) at 37 ℃ in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Cell viability was assessed by conducting colorimetric measurements of the amount of insoluble formazan formed in living cells based on the reduction of 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Briefly, 100 μL of adherent cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well cell culture plate and allowed to adhere for 12 h before drug addition, while suspended cells were seeded just before drug addition, both with an initial density of 1 × 105 cells/mL in 100 μL of medium. Each tumor cell line was exposed to the test compounds at various concentrations in triplicate for 48 h, with DDP and toxal as positive controls. After the incubation, MTT (100 μg) was added to each well, and the incubation continued for 4 h at 37 ℃. The cells lysed with 200 μL SDS after removal of 100 μL of medium. The optical density of lysate was measured at 595 nm in a 96-well microtiter plate reader (Bio-Rad 680). The IC50 value of each compound was calculated by Reed and Muench's method.21

Notes

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13659-011-0018-4 and is accessible for authorized users.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2009CB522300), the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (30830113), and MOST (2009ZX09501-029).

References

  1. 1.
    T. Diyabalanage, V. Mulabagal, G. Mills, D. L. DeWitt, M. G. Nair, Food Chem. 108, 97-102 (2008) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Won-Gon, L. In-Kyoung, K. Jong-Pyung, R. In-Ja, K. Hiroyuki, I. D. Yoo, J. Nat. Prod. 60, 721-723 (1997) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. H. K. Ngai, Z. Zhao, T. B. Ng, Peptides 26, 191-196 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. X. Wang, T. B. Ng, Q. H. Liu, Life Sci. 70, 877-885 (2002) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Tadashi, S. Satoshi, U. Shigoe, Carbohydr. Res. 251, 81-87 (1994) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. L. Yang, M. Zang, X. X. Liu, Acta Bot. Yunn. 15, 18-20 (1993) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. M. Zhou, Y. C. Zhao, W. M. Chen, H. M. Chai, S. H. Li, J. Zhao, Acta Bot. Yunn. 32, 315-322 (2010) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. C. Zhu, G. Wang, X. L. Yang, D. Q. Luo, Q. C. Zhu, T. Peng, J. K. Liu, Tetrahedron Lett. 51, 3443-3445 (2010) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Wang, L. Y. Liu, Y. C. Zhu, J. K. Liu, J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 13, 430-433 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Schobert, S. Knauer, S. Seibt, B. Biersack, Curr. Med. Chem. 18, 790-807 (2011) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Gonzalez Del Val, G. Platas, F. Arenal, J. C. Orihuela, M. Garcia, P. Hernandez, I. Royo, N. De Pedro, L. L. Silver, K. Young, M. F. Vicente, F. Pelaez, Mycol. Res. 107, 1201-1209 (2003) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Poindessous, F. Koeppel, E. Raymond, E. Cvitkovic, S. J. Waters, A. K. Larsen, Int. J. Oncol. 23, 1347-1355 (2003) PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Serova, F. Calvo, F. Lokiec, F. Koeppel, V. Poindessous, A. K. Larsen, E. S. Van Laar, S. J. Waters, E. Cvitkovic, E. Raymond, Cancer Chemoth. Pharm. 57, 491-499 (2006) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. J. Kelner, T. C. McMorris, R. J. Rojas, L. A. Estes, P. Suthipinjtham, Invest. New Drugs 26, 407-415 (2008) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. R. Pettit, Y. Meng, R. K. Pettit, D. L. Herald, Z. A. Cichacz, D. L. Doubek, L. Richert, J. Nat. Prod. 73, 388-392 (2010) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Falk, A. Timm, S. Olov, Tetrahedron 58, 7785-7789 (2002) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Alberto, C. Rosanna, N. Gianluca, Orso, Vajna de Pava, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 733-737 (1991) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. J. Kelner, T. C. McMorris, L. A. Estes, M. Rutherford, M. Montoya, J. Goldstein, K. Samson, R. Starr, R. Taetle, Biochem. Pharmcol. 48, 403-409 (1994) PubMed Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Matsuoka, A. Hirosawa, S. Natori, S. Iwasaki, T. Sofuni, M. Ishidate, J. Mutat. Res. 215, 179-185 (1989) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Yamada, M. Ojika, H. Kigoshi, Nat. Prod. Rep. 24, 798-813 (2007) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. J. Reed, H. Muench, Am. J. Hyg. 27, 493-497 (1938) PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s)92 and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liang-Yan LIU
    • a,b
  • Ling ZHANG
    • a
  • Tao FENG
    • a
  • Zheng-Hui LI
    • a
  • Ze-Jun DONG
    • a
  • Xing-Yao LI
    • a,b
  • Jia SU
    • a,b
  • Yan LI
    • a
  • Ji-Kai LIU
    • a
  •     
  1. a. State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
  2. b. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China