Cyclopeptides from Amanita exitialis

  • Jing-Hua XUE ,  
  • Ping WU ,  
  • Yu-Lang CHI ,  
  • Liang-Xiong XU ,  
  • Xiao-Yi WEI
  •     

Abstract

A new cyclic nonapeptide, amanexitide(1), along with the known cyclopeptides, α-and β-amanitins, was isolated from the fruiting bodies of Amanita exitialis, a newly described poisonous mushroom endemic to Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. Its amino acid composition and absolute configuration were determined by chemical degradation and derivatization followed by chiral GC analysis. Its amino acid sequence was elucidated by extensive analysis of ESIMS/MS and FTICRMS data. The occurrence of 1 in this mushroom is interesting because it has a structure closely related to antamanide, a cyclic decapeptide with antidote activity against amatoxins and phallotoxins, occurring in A. phalloides.

Keywords

Amanita    Amanita exitialis    cyclopeptides    amanexitide    

Introduction

Amanita mushrooms are well known for the toxic properties of some species.1 Their toxins are demonstrated to be cyclopeptides, including amatoxins, phallotoxins, and virotoxins, which all contain a sulfur-linked tryptophan unit and some unusual hydroxylated amino acids.1 Among these toxins amatoxins are considered to be the only group responsible for fatal mushroom poisoning.2 The mechanism of amatoxins is the inhibition of transcription from DNA to mRNA by the blockade of nuclear RNA polymerase Ⅱ.2 Interestingly, a cyclic decapeptide, antamanide, acting as a potential anti-toxin against the effects of phallotoxins and amatoxins has been also isolated from an Amanita mushroom, the death cap A. phalloides.3, 4

Amanita exitialis, endemic to Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China, is a new Amanita species originally described in 2001.5 This mushroom annually comes out at the beginning of March and disappears at the end of April in the north suburbs of Guangzhou. It has caused the death of more than 20 persons by the ingestion of it due to confusion with some wild edible mushrooms growing in the same area since 2000 when the first incidence of its poisoning was reported.6 A previous HPLC analysis detected amatoxins and phallotoxins from the fruiting bodies of this mushroom.7 For better understanding of its metabolites, we carried out a chemical investigation on this mushroom. We previously reported the isolation of a new purine nucleoside, N2-(1-methoxycarbonylethyl)guanosine, along with β-carboline and russulaceramide.8 Herein, we report the isolation and structure elucidation of a new cyclic nonapeptide, amanexitide (1), along with the known amatoxins, α-and β-amanitins from this species.

Results and Discussion

The fresh fruiting bodies of A. exitialis were extracted with 95% EtOH at room temperature. The EtOH extract was successively partitioned with petroleum ether and EtOAc. The EtOAc-soluble fraction was separated by silica gel column chromatography to give amanexitide (1) as colorless needles. The water-soluble fraction was separated by Diaion HP-20 and silica gel column chromatography followed by HPLC to provide α-amanitin and β-amanitin, 9 which were identified by interpretation of their spectroscopic data (ESIMS, 1H and 13C NMR) as well as by comparison with reported data.

Compound 1 was a cyclic peptide as characterized by acid hydrolysis and ninhydrin reaction on TLC plates using the method described by Zhou and Tan.10 To determine the amino acid composition and absolute configuration, the compound was hydrolyzed with 6 N HCl containing 4% thioglycolic acid and the resultant amino acids were converted into the 2-propyl esters of their trifluoroacetylated derivatives.11 The mixture of the prepared amino acid derivatives was subjected to GC-MS analysis with a chiral capillary column and the results showed that the cyclopeptide consisted of phenylalanine (Phe), proline (Pro), valine (Val), leucine (Leu), and serine (Ser), and these amino acids all had the L configuration.

The molecular weight 1033 for amanexitide (1) was deduced from the quasi-molecular ions at m/z 1072 [M + K]+, 1056 [M + Na]+, and 1034 [M + H]+ in the positive ESIMS and m/z 1068 [M + Cl] and 1032 [M – H] in the negative ESIMS. Its molecular formula C56H75N9O10 was assigned on the basis of the quasi-molecular ion at m/z 1034.5715 [M + H]+ (calcd for C56H75N9O10, 1034.5715) in the HRESIMS. This in combination with the results of GC-MS analysis deduced that compound 1 was comprised of three Phe, two Pro, two Val, one Leu, and one Ser per molecule. When this cyclopeptide was subjected to NMR measurements using pyridine-d5 and CDCl3 as solvents, it provided sets of broad proton and carbon signals due to the existence of multiple conformers in the both solvents. The measurements in other solvents were prevented from by the poor solubility. Sequence analysis of amanexitide using NMR technique failed. However, it has been demonstrated that proline-containing cyclopeptides can be readily sequenced by mass spectrometry because they undergo selective ring cleavage at the prolyl-peptidyl amide bond due to the more basic nature of the proline nitrogen relative to the other peptide bond nitrogen atoms, leading to a linear peptide C-ended by an acylium ion (bn), which undergoes further fragmentation generating series of acylium ions.12 Therefore, sequence analysis of this proline-containing cyclopeptide was conducted by the tandem electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (ESIMS) technique.

The protonated molecular ion [M + H]+ of 1 at m/z 1034.5 was subjected to collision-activated dissociation (CAD) experiment. In the product-ion spectrum (Figure 1), two Prodirected fragmentation pathways (Figure 2) were observed. One started from ring opening at the Pro-Leu amide bond and a series of adjacent acylium ions (bnPL) at m/z 921, 834, 687, 588, 491, 344, and 197 could be seen. The sequential loss of amino acid residues from the C-terminus to the N-terminus of the linearized amanexitide (1) was that of Leu, Ser, Phe, Val, Pro, Phe, and Phe yielding the N-terminal dipeptide ion [HPro-Val]+ (Figure 2A). This pathway was also recognized by the series of adjacent immonium ions (anPL) at m/z 1006, 806, 659, 560, 463, 316, and 169 due to the loss of a molecule of carbon monoxide (CO) from the [M + H]+ ion and the above b7PL–b2PL ions. Only two ions at m/z 1016 and 903 corresponding to the loss of a molecule of water (H2O) from the [M + H]+ and the b8PL ions were observed while those from other bnPL fragments were not observed. Another fragmentation pathway was initiated by the ring cleavage at Pro-Phe amide bond. The series of bnPF ions at m/z 887, 740, 544, 431, 344, and 197 suggested the successive loss of Phe, Phe, ValPro, Leu, Ser, and Phe yielding [HPro-Val]+ (Figure 2B), the same N-terminal dipeptide ion as that in the first pathway. The series of anPF ions due to the loss of a CO from these bnPF fragments was observed at m/z 859, 712, 516, 403, 316, and 169. A short series of ions observed at m/z 869, 722, 526, and 413 was due to the loss of a H2O from the first four bnPF (b8PF, b7PF, b5PF, and b4PF) fragments. These data suggested the sequence [H-Pro1-Val2-Phe3-Phe4-Pro5-Val6-Phe7-Ser8-Leu9]+ for the linearized peptide ion formed from amanexitide (1).

Fig. 1

Positive ion ESIMS2 spectrum of [M + H]+ ion at m/z 1034.5 for compound 1: (A) m/z 600—1060; (B) m/z 100—600.

Fig. 2

Two Pro-directed CAD fragmentation pathways of compound 1: (A) Cleavage at the Pro1-Leu9 amide bond level; (B) cleavage at the Pro5-Phe4 amide bond level.

In order to confirm the above fragments, the protonated molecular ion [M + H]+ of 1 at m/z 1034.5 was subjected to SORI-CID experiment on a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry (FTICRMS). In the product-ion spectrum (Figure 3), three ions at m/z 673.3730, 526.3042, and 379.2343 were extremely abundant (Figure 3A). They apparently resulted from ring-opening at the Ser-Phe amide bond followed by the loss of a H2O from the serine residue to produce a fragment with 2, 3-didehydroalanine (Dha) as the Nterminal residue at m/z 1016.5619, which underwent further fragmentation by sequential loss of Pro-Val-Phe, Phe, and Phe yielding the N-terminal tetrapeptide Dha-Leu-Pro-Val (Figure 3A). The most ions stated above for the two Pro-directed fragmentation pathways were also observed (Table 1) though some were weak, and their exact masses were in accord with the predicted values as shown in Table 1. Therefore, the structure of amanexitide was elucidated as shown. The geometry of the peptidic linkages at the proline residues was not determined due to the poor solubility restraining detailed NMR experiments.

Fig. 3

Positive FTICRMS/MS spectrum of [M + H]+ at m/z 1034.5 for compound 1: (A) The whole spectrum and the assignment of predominant ions, (B) m/z 680–1060, (C) m/z 200–760.

Table 1

Significant FTICRMS ions of compound 1.

fragment ion composition found m/z intensity calcd m/z error (ppm)
M + H C56H76N9O10 1034.5724 24708093 1034.5715 + 0.87
M + H -H2O C56H74N9O9 1016.5619 104039817 1016.5610 + 0.96
M + H -CO C55H76N9O9 1006.5766 10600576 1006.5766 + 0.03
M + H -H2O -CO C55H74N9O8 988.5660 9870132 988.5660 -0.04
b8PL C50H65N8O9 921.4883 10234173 921.4875 + 0.95
b8PL -H2O C50H63N8O8 903.4781 19280059 903.4769 + 1.33
b8PF C47H67N8O9 887.5054 9484268 887.5031 + 2.63
b8PF -H2O C47H65N8O8 869.4945 49542104 869.4925 + 2.27
a8PF C46H67N8O8 859.5096 1328446 859.5082 + 1.58
M + H -b2PL/b2PF C46H60N7O8 838.4520 22105954 838.4503 + 2.02
b7PL C47H60N7O7 834.4565 32694676 834.4554 + 1.31
M + H -b2PL/b2PF -H2O C46H58N7O7 820.4407 65171127 820.4398 + 1.13
M + H -b2PL/b2PF -CO C45H60N7O7 810.4574 4027286 810.4554 + 2.44
a7PL C46H60N7O6 806.4618 6264517 806.4605 + 1.56
b7SF -H2O C42H56N7O7 770.4248 22546114 770.4241 + 0.90
b7PF C38H58N7O8 740.4347 5041794 740.4347 + 0.03
b7PF -H2O C38H56N7O7 722.4254 14513248 722.4241 + 1.81
a7PF C37H58N7O7 712.4408 690224 712.4398 + 1.47
b6SF C37H51N6O7 691.3831 30506526 691.3819 + 1.71
b6PL C38H51N6O6 687.3874 33152698 687.3870 + 0.52
b6SF -H2O C37H49N6O6 673.3730 517959322 673.3714 + 2.41
a6SF C36H51N6O6 663.3877 2921004 663.3870 + 1.03
a6PL C37H51N6O5 659.3936 4814472 659.3921 + 2.35
M + H -b4SF C37H44N5O5 638.3350 51474859 638.3342 + 1.24
M + H -b4SF -CO C36H44N5O4 610.3403 16968414 610.3393 + 1.62
b5PL C33H42N5O5 588.3195 2720318 588.3186 + 1.53
b5PF C28H42N5O6 544.3138 18142810 544.3135 + 0.57
b5PF -H2O C28H40N5O5 526.3042 872095946 526.3029 + 2.30
a5PF C27H42N5O5 516.3196 4329125 516.3186 + 1.96
a5SF -H2O C27H40N5O4 498.3086 25513729 498.3080 + 1.04
b4PL C28H35N4O4 491.2663 80915682 491.2658 + 0.92
a4PL C27H35N4O3 463.2709 46818520 463.2709 + 0.00
b4PF -H2O C22H29N4O4 413.2191 5625672 413.2189 + 0.53
b4SF -H2O C19H31N4O4 379.2343 286772469 379.2345 -0.55
a4SF -H2O C18H31N4O3 351.2392 28604150 351.2396 -1.11
b3PL, b3PF C19H26N3O3 344.1968 44758821 344.1974 -1.92
a3PL, a3PF C18H26N3O2 316.2018 4040034 316.2025 -2.63
b3SF -H2O C14H22N3O3 280.1650 20303286 280.1661 -4.04

Compound 1 was evaluated for cytotoxicity against various cancer cells (A549, LAC, HeLa, HepG2, HL-60, KB, GH3, and AT3)13 and inhibition of the production of proinflammatory cytokines, TNFα and IL-6, in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated J774A.1 macrophages, 14 but was found to be inactive in both assays. Nevertheless, it is interesting that the sequence of the first five amino acid residues, Pro1-Val2-Phe3-Phe4-Pro5, in amanexitide (1) is the same as that in antamanide, a cyclic decapeptide previously isolated as an antidote for poisoning of amatoxins and phallotoxins from A. phalloides.2 4 This in combination with the isolation of α-and β-amatoxins showed that A. exitialis may be close to A. phalloides in genetic relationship. In addition, compound 1, having a structure related to antamanide, deserves further investigation of its antidote activity against amatoxins and phallotoxins.

Experimental Section

General Experimental Procedures. The melting point was determined on a Yanagimoto Seisakusho MD-S2 micromelting point apparatus and was uncorrected. Optical rotations were obtained on a Perkin-Elmer 341 polarimeter with MeOH as solvent. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance-600 instrument. HRESIMS data were obtained on a Bruker Bio TOF IIIQ mass spectrometer. Preparative HPLC was performed with a Shimadzu LC-6A pump and a Shimadzu RID-10A refractive index detector using an XTerra prep MS C18 column (10 μm, 300 × 19 mm). For column chromatography, silica gel 60 (100-200 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, China) and Diaion HP-20 (200– 600 μm, Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan) were used.

Mushroom Material. The fresh fruiting bodies of A. exitialis were collected at South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, in March, 2006. The mushroom was authenticated by Prof. Tai-Hui Li, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou.

Extraction and Isolation. The fresh fruiting bodies of A. exitialis (13.8 kg) were cut and crushed into a pulpy mass with an electric blender. EtOH (95%, 15 L) was added and the mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 24 h. The thick suspension was then filtered and the residue was further extracted two times with 95% EtOH (15 L each). The filtrates of all three extractions were combined and evaporated. The resulting brown syrup (440 g) was suspended in 1000 mL of water. The suspension was successively partitioned with petroleum ether (3 × 1000 mL) and EtOAc (4 × 1000 mL). The EtOAc layer was evaporated under vacuum to yield an EtOAcsoluble fraction (6.1 g). This fraction was subjected to silica gel CC eluted with a gradient of CHCl3-MeOH (100:0-80:20) to give seven fractions (E1-E7). Fraction E4, obtained on elution with CHCl3-MeOH (90:10), was purified by recrystallization in MeOH to give amanexitide (1) as colorless needles (34 mg). The aqueous layer was concentrated in vacuum to remove the residual EtOAc and then filtered. A portion (150 mL) of the filtrate (750 mL) was subjected to passage over a Diaion HP-20 column, sequentially eluted with H2O, 20% EtOH, and 95% EtOH. The fractions obtained by elution with 20% EtOH and 95% EtOH was combined and concentrated to provide a residue (8.5 g). This residue was subjected to a silica gel column eluted with CHCl3-MeOH mixtures of increasing polarity (9:1 to 5:5) to give six fractions (W1-W6). Fraction W3 (1.61 g), obtained by elution with CHCl3-MeOH (7:3), was separated by preparative HPLC using 12% MeOH to afford α-amanitin (28 mg). Fraction W4 (1.30 g), obtained by elution with CHCl3-MeOH (6:4), was also separated by preparative HPLC using 12% MeOH to afford β-amanitin (8 mg).

Amanexitide (1): colorless needles (MeOH), mp 210 ℃ (decomp.); [α]D26 -104.5 (c 0.2, MeOH); positive ESIMS m/z 1072 [M + K]+, 1056 [M + Na]+, 1034 [M + H]+; negative ESIMS m/z 1068 [M + Cl], 1032 [M H]; positive ESIMS2 see Figures 1 and 2; FTICRMS see Table 1 and Figure 3; HRESIMS m/z 1034.5715 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C56H75N9O10, 1034.5715).

ESIMS/MS Analysis. A bench-top triple quadrupole mass spectrometer model API 2000 (MDS Sciex, Concorde, Canada) equipped with a Sciex TurboIonSpray probe was used. Compound 1 in MeOH was directly infused into the mass spectrometer (flow-rate = 10 μL/min) to acquire the full-scan and product ion mass spectra. The Q1 full scan spectrum of 1 was first conducted to obtain its corresponding protonated molecular ion at m/z 1034.5. The product ion scan spectrum was further acquired by transmitting the protonated molecular ion via Q1 and scanning for products resulting from fragmentation in the collision cell. The final electrospray conditions were as follows: nitrogen curtain gas, 40 L/min; ion-spray voltage 4800 V, source block temperature 120 ℃, desolvation gas temperature 400 ℃. Nitrogen was used as drying gas and nebulising gas at flow rates of approximately 50 and 450 L/h. The low-energy collision-activated dissociation (CAD) experiment was performed using nitrogen as collision gas, and a collision energy of 40 eV was used. Significant fragment ions are labeled with the four-part descriptor (xnJZ) proposed by Ngoka and Gross.15

FTICRMS Analysis. FTICR-MS analysis was performed on a commercial APEX Qe FT-MS instrument equipped with a 9.4 T superconducting magnet and a Combi ESI/MALDI ion source (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica MA) using electrospray ionization. Compound 1 (1 mg) was dissolved in 1 mL of MeOH and 1 μL of this solution was diluted in 1 mL of 0.1% formic acid and 80% MeCN afterward. The flow rate was 1 mL/min and the temperature of dry gas (nitrogen) was set to 120 ℃. The Q front-end consists of a quadrupole mass filter followed by a hexapole collision cell. By switching the potentials on the exit lenses appropriately under the control of the data acquisition computer, ions could be accumulated either in the hexapole of the Combi ESI source, or in the hexapole collision cell of the Q front-end, prior to transfer to the FTMS analyzer cell. Mass spectrum was obtained by accumulating ions in the collision hexapole and running the quadrupole mass filter in nonmass-selective (RF-only) mode so that ions of a broad m/z range (200–1200) were passed to the FTMS analyzer cell. The accumulation time in collision cell was set at 0.5 s, the cell was opened for 4500 ms, 16 experiments were collected for one spectrum. The instrument was externally calibrated using quadruple-, triple-and double-charged ions of angiotensin Ⅰ. It results in typical mass accuracy below 1 ppm. After the analysis the spectra were apodized using sin apodization with one zero fill.

Amino Acid Analysis. Compound 1 (1 mg) in 1 ml of 6 N HCl containing 4% thioglycolic acid were heated at 110 ℃ for 24 h in a sealed tube. After cooling, the solution was concentrated to dryness. The hydrolysate was dissolved in anhydrous solution of 3 N HCl in 2-propanol and heated at 110 ℃ for 30 min. The reagent were evaporated under reduce pressure. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (0.5 ml) and 0.5 ml trifluoracetic anhydride was added. The mixture was kept in a screwcapped tube at 110 ℃ for 20 min. The reagents were evaporated and the mixture was subjected to GC-MS analysis using a Shimadzu GCMS-QP2000Plus apparatus, equipped with a Chirasil-l-Val (N-propionyl-l-valine-tertbutylamide polysiloxane) quartz capillary column. The carrier gas was nitrogen (1.1 bar). Column temperature was initially 50 ℃ and gradually increased to 130 ℃ at 3 ℃/min, then increased to 190 ℃ at 10 ℃/min. For GC-MS detection, an electron ionization system was used with an ionization energy of 70 eV. Five amino acid derivatives were detected from the mixture. By analysis of EIMS data, four of them were identified to be the 2-propyl esters of N-trifluoroacetylated Val (tR = 12.0), Leu (tR = 13.9), Pro (tR = 16.9), and Phe (tR = 22.8), and one was N, O-ditrifluoroacetylserine 2-propyl ester (tR = 14.7). Next, these derivatives were prepared from standard amino acids. The derivatives from hydrolysate were then re-analyzed and their retention times were compared with those of the derivatives from standard amino acids. The amino acid residues in 1 were confirmed and all were determined to have the L configuration.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Tai-Hui Li, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou, China for the authentication of plant material. This work was supported by the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KSCX2-YW-N-036).

References

  1. 1.
    C. Li, N. H. Oberlies, Life Sci. 78, 532-538 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Letschert, H. Heinz Faulstich, D. Keller, D. Keppler, Toxicol. Sci. 91, 140-149 (2006) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Wieland, H. Faulstich, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. 5, 185-260 (1978) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. D. Kroncke, G. Fricker, P. J. Meier, W. Gerokn, T. Wieland, G. Kurz, J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12562-12567 (1986) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z. L. Yang, T. H. Li, Mycotaxon 78, 439-448 (2001) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Zhang, Z. H. Chen, J. S. Hu, B. Y. Wei, Z. G. Zhang, W. Q. Hu, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 252, 223-228 (2005) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. S. Hu, Z. H. Chen, Z. G. Zhang, P. Zhang, Acta Microbiol. Sin. 43, 642-646 (2003) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. L. Chi, H. Y. Zhang, J. H. Xue, J. Hao, M. F. Liu, X. Y. Wei, Chin. Chem. Lett. 20, 830-832 (2009) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. H. Kim, S. U. Choi, K. M. Park, S. J. Seok, K. R. Lee, Arch. Pharm. Res. 31, 579-586 (2008) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Zhou, N. H. Tan, Chin. Sci. Bull. 45, 1825-1831 (2000) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Wélé, C. Landon, H. Labbé, F. Vovelle, Y. Zhang, B. Bodo, Tetrahedron 60, 405-414 (2004) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. B. Tomer, F. W. Crow, M. L. Gross, Anal. Chem. 56, 880-886 (1984) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    X. H. Li, L. X. Xu, P. Wu, H. H. Xie, Z. L. Huang, W. H. Ye, X. Y. Wei, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 57, 495-498 (2009) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. L. Yang, K. F. Hua, P. H. Chuang, S. H. Wu, K. Y. Wu, F. R. Chang, Y. C. Wu, J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 386-392 (2008) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. C. M. Ngoka, M. L. Gross, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 10, 360-363 (1999) CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing-Hua XUE
  • Ping WU
  • Yu-Lang CHI
  • Liang-Xiong XU
  • Xiao-Yi WEI
  •     
    Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xingke Road 723, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510650, China