武汉大学学报(医学版)   2018, Vol. 39Issue (4): 667-670   DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8852.2017.0688.
0

引用本文 

张莉, 程真顺, 吴开松, 杨炯. 感染唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌1例并文献复习[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2018, 39(4): 667-670. DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8852.2017.0688.
ZHANG Li, CHENG Zhenshun, WU Kaisong, YANG Jiong. One Case Report of Burkholderia Gladioli Infection and Review of Literature[J]. Medical Journal of Wuhan University, 2018, 39(4): 667-670. DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8852.2017.0688.

作者简介

张莉, 女, 1979-, 医学博士, 副主任医师, 主要从事呼吸系统疾病研究, E-mail:zhangcatli1979@sina.com

基金项目

国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:81300031)

文章历史

收稿日期:2017-07-28
感染唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌1例并文献复习
张莉 , 程真顺 , 吴开松 , 杨炯     
武汉大学中南医院呼吸内科 湖北 武汉 430071
[摘要] 目的: 分析唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌感染的临床特征。方法: 分析我科近期1例唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌感染住院患者的临床资料, 并结合既往文献报道, 对该菌感染特征及诊治情况进行分析。结果: 唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌易感对象多为新生儿或有基础疾病患者, 但健康者亦偶可发病。患者多出现发热和肺部症状。感染常导致败血症。联合用药, 患者预后多较好。结论: 健康人群中, 该菌感染多为散发病例。如无基础疾病, 患者预后常较好。需要警惕该菌对碳青霉烯药物耐药。
关键词唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌    诊断    治疗    
One Case Report of Burkholderia Gladioli Infection and Review of Literature
ZHANG Li, CHENG Zhenshun, WU Kaisong, YANG Jiong     
Dept. of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
[Abstract] Objective: To present the clinical manifestations of Burkholderia gladioli infection. Methods: One case of Burkholderia gladioli infection in our hospital was studied and other literature review were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Burkholderia gladioli infection often occured in newborns or patients with chronic diseases, and seldom in healthy people. Fever and respiratory symptoms were the most common clinical features, and then often developed into sepsis. The bacteria were eradicated by treating with combined antibiotics in most cases. Conclusion: More attention should be paid to the infection of Burkholderia gladioli in healthy people, though the prognosis may be always good. The resistance of Burkholderia gladioli to carbapenems should be vigilant.
Key words: Burkholderia Gladioli    Diagnosis    Treatment    

唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌(Burkholderia gladioli)是一种革兰染色阴性的非发酵菌,属于假单胞菌属。通常情况下,它是一种条件致病菌,临床感染并不常见。本文报告近期发现的1例以发热为表现的唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌感染病例,临床表现与既往报道病例略有不同。并与既往文献分析对比,以期对今后临床工作提供参考。

1 资料与方法 1.1 病例资料

男性,43岁,农民,湖北洪湖人。因“间断性发热伴气促、咳嗽、全身关节酸痛2月”入院。患者2月前无诱因出现发热,体温高达41.0 ℃,夜间为主,伴寒战、大汗淋漓,气促,活动后明显,伴咳嗽咳痰,为少量白黏痰,并出现全身关节酸痛,无胸痛心悸,无恶心呕吐,无腹痛腹泻,无尿频尿急尿痛;在当地给予抗感染,头孢哌酮舒巴坦钠针剂3.0 g静滴,tid,治疗5 d,体温可降至正常停药。但10 d后患者发热反复,再次给予头孢哌酮舒巴坦钠针剂3.0 g静滴,tid,治疗5 d,体温可降至正常停药,10余天再次发热,如此反复2次。遂转至我院。起病以来,患者精神、食欲、睡眠随病情进展逐日变差,大小便如常,体力下降,体重下降5 kg。既往史:既往健康。有15年吸烟史,40支/d;15年饮酒史,50 ml/d。体格检查:T 37.2 ℃,P 82次/min,呼吸20次/min,血压100/65 mmHg。神志清楚,自动体位,检查合作。皮肤、巩膜无黄染,咽无充血,扁桃体无肿大。胸骨无叩痛。双肺呼吸音清晰,无干湿性啰音。HR 82次/min,节律齐,心脏各瓣膜区未闻及杂音。腹平软,无压痛及反跳痛,肝脾未扪及肿大。双肾区无叩痛,双下肢无水肿。生理反射存在,病理反射未引出。辅助检查:血常规:WBC 11.74×109/L,NE% 7.9×109/L,NE 67.3%,Eos% 0.10×109/L,Eos 0.6%,RBC 3.97×1012/L,Hb 97.4 g/L,PLT 345×109/L。大便常规:正常。大便隐血:阴性。尿常规正常。肝肾功能、血电解质、血糖:正常值范围。血沉:75 mm/h。凝血功能、D-二聚体:正常。输血前八项:均阴性。降钙素原(PCT):0.18 ng/ml。肌酶谱:正常值范围。抗O(ASO)抗体、类风湿因子、血清抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体、风湿全套、抗中性粒细胞抗体全套、抗心磷脂抗体、血肿瘤标志物全套、抗肾小球基底膜抗体均未见异常。多次痰查抗酸染色:阴性。多次痰培养及血培养:阴性。多种寄生虫抗体检测阴性。PET-CT:右锁骨上区、纵隔及双肺门、腹腔内肝胃间隙、胰腺后、肝门区、胰头旁、肠系膜区、腹膜后腹主动脉旁、左侧髂外血管旁及双侧腹股沟区多发淋巴结,部分肿大,代谢不同程度增高,以上考虑淋巴结炎可能性大。全身骨髓弥漫性代谢增强,考虑反应性改变所致,建议结合骨髓活检。骨髓细胞学及活检未见异常。骨髓培养:唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌感染,美罗培南耐药,左氧氟沙星中介,头孢他啶,复方新诺明敏感。联合头孢他啶和复方新诺明治疗,第7天患者体温完全正常,第14天复查血常规、血沉及降钙素原等指标正常,予以出院。半月后患者因发热(T38.5 ℃)再次入院。腹股沟淋巴结活检:慢性炎症改变。组织病原学培养阴性。行鼻窦CT、鼻咽镜检查、支气管镜、心脏彩超、腹部B超、中段尿培养均无异常,其它实验室检查结果基本同前次(PET-CT未复查)。给予联合头孢他啶和复方新诺明治疗2周出院,并院外口服头孢地尼和复方新诺明2周。目前随访2月,患者未发热,无其他不适。

1.2 文献复习

利用Pubmed和中国知网(CNKI),以“Burkholderia gladioli”和“唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌”为检索词,截止至2017年1月16日,检出具有全文可供分析的中文文献4篇[1-4],英文20篇[5-23]。在此,加入本例数据,综合分析所有数据如下。

2 结果 2.1 患者基本情况分析

目前可查询数据统计,结合此文报道的1例患者,唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌感染的患病人群中男性38例,女性24例,婴儿103例。发病年龄0-76岁。62例年龄大于1岁的患者中,其中既往健康者6例;肺囊性纤维化患者40例;糖尿病患者8例;慢性肉芽肿病患者4例;其余肝移植患者、重症肌无力患者、腹膜透析患者及艾滋病患者各1例。

2.2 患者临床特征分析

165例患者中,96例(58.18%)患者出现发热,以肺部症状为主要表现的有150例(90.91%),脓肿患者5例(3.03%),骨髓炎患者3例(1.82%),咽部炎症患者4例(2.42%),其他腹膜炎、鼻窦炎、中耳炎、淋巴结炎、颅内感染患者各1例。对致病菌检测,共检出唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌176例,其中血培养来源113例(64.20%),痰培养43例(24.43%),各种脓液培养8例(4.55%),胸腹水培养4例(2.27%),骨髓培养3例(1.70%),肺活检组织培养2例,淋巴结组织培养1例,支气管肺泡灌洗液培养1例。针对细菌耐药性分析(具体见图 1)在已知的139例患者中,87例(62.59%)新生儿患者药敏试验提示对所有药物敏感,虽然国内有美罗培南耐药菌株的报道[1, 3],国外尚无发现。已知预后的160例患者中,151例(94.38%)患者经治疗感染控制,但其中有13例(8.13%)患者虽然最终结局良好,治疗过程中却出现病情反复,9例(5.63%)患者死亡。

图 1 唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌耐药率分析(n=139)
3 讨论

既往认为唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌是一种植物致病菌,导致剑兰、鸢尾花、水稻等植物致病。1989年Christenson等人[24]发现其亦可引起肺囊性纤维化患者呼吸道感染。唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌是一种需氧革兰阴性杆菌,它通过产生呼吸道毒素米酵菌酸致病。

既往关于唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌感染的病例主要来源于中国、美国、土耳其、新西兰等国家。23篇中18篇均为散发例数报道。

通过文献复习,唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌感染有如下特点:几乎是全年龄段感染,但新生儿在感染的年龄段中占一半以上比重(62.80%)。男女比例约为1.65:1。唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌作为条件致病菌,主要感染新生儿、肺囊性纤维化病、免疫力低下或受抑制的患者,平时身体健康者极少患病(6例,3.64%)。成人患者中,国外易感人群肺囊性纤维化患者最多见(40/61),而国内艾彪[1]统计34例有基础疾病患者,肾病患者占61.74%(21/34)。国内肺囊性纤维化病发病率低,并且推论主要来自一家医院儿科血培养标本的资料,因此还有待更多病例统计。无论国内外文献报道,感染患者临床表现最常见的均是发热和肺部症状。血培养的检出(64.20%)高于痰培养的检出(24.43%)。这可能还是与患者多为免疫力不全(新生儿)或低下(有基础疾病),致病菌感染后易播散有关。临床多来源的样本检测,如同时查痰、血、分泌物可提高细菌的检出率。虽然感染者多为新生儿或有基础疾病的患者,且多有血行感染,但统计表明预后多较佳,94.38%的患者经治疗感染控制,仅5.63%的患者死亡。细菌耐药率不高,仅20.14%的病株对2类或以上抗生素耐药。而临床常是联合用药,这可能是预后较好的原因。

在我科报道的病例中,还有如下特点值得注意。①患者没有基础疾病,感染唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌后,虽然使用了敏感抗生素,但病情反复。既往也有病情迁延的报道[14, 17],但这些病情迁延患者存在基础疾病糖尿病或肺囊性纤维化病。我科病例骨髓感染,可能是病情迁延的原因。这在今后临床工作中值得警惕。②病菌对美罗培南耐药,国内文献报道[1]美罗培南耐药率(1.9%),亚胺培南3.8%。依据药敏结果合理选择抗生素,警惕细菌耐药范围增宽。

参考文献
[1] 艾彪, 周莉, 艾明华, 等. 唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌血流感染的诊断与治疗[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 25(17): 3856-3858.
Ai B, Zhou L, Ai MH, et al. Laboratory diagnosis and treatment of blood infections caused by Burkholderia gladioli[J]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2015, 25(17): 3856-3858.
[2] 肖倩茹, 侯伟伟, 江涟, 等. 胸水中分离唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌1株[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2013, 31(7): 498.
Xiao QR, Hou WW, Jian L, et al. A case of Burkholderia gladioli from pleural effusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science, 2013, 31(7): 498.
[3] 黄锐, 王佳. 新生儿病房不常见非发酵菌检出及药物敏感性分析[J]. 临床医药实践, 2016, 25(5): 356-358.
Huang R, Wang J. Analysis of the detection and drug sensitivity of the uncommon nonfermenting bacilli in neonatal ward[J]. Proceeding of Clinical Medicine, 2016, 25(5): 356-358.
[4] 陈如寿, 钟佳芳. 唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德菌引起败血症及全身多发脓肿1例[J]. 中国保健营养, 2013, 3: 659-660.
Chen RS, Zhong JF. A case report of sepsis and abscess inducing by Burkholderia gladioli[J]. Journal of Chinese Health Care Nutrition, 2013, 3: 659-660.
[5] Zhou F, Ning H, Chen F, et al. Burkholderia gladioli infection isolated from the blood cultures of newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2015, 34(8): 1533-1537. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-015-2382-1.
[6] Imataki O, Kita N, Nakayama-Imaohji H, et al. Bronchiolitis and bacteraemia caused by Burkholderia gladioli in a non-lung transplantation patient[J]. New Microbes New Infect, 2014, 2(6): 175-176. DOI: 10.1002/nmi2.64.
[7] Tong Y, Dou L, Wang C. Peritonitis due to Burkholderia gladioli[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2013, 77(2): 174-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.06.010.
[8] Dursun A, Zenciroglu A, Karagol BS, et al. Burkholderia gladioli sepsis in newborns[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2012, 171(10): 1503-1509. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-012-1756-y.
[9] Karagöl BS, Okumuş N, Karada N, et al. Isolated congenital pleural effusion in two neonates[J]. Tuberk Toraks, 2012, 60(1): 52-55. DOI: 10.5578/tt.2984.
[10] Quon BS, Reid JD, Wong P, et al. Burkholderia gladioli-a predictor of poor outcome in cystic fibrosis patients who receive lung transplants? A case of locally invasive rhinosinusitis and persistent bacteremia in a 36-year-old lung transplant recipient with cystic fibrosis[J]. Can Respir J, 2011, 18(4): e64-e65. DOI: 10.1155/2011/304179.
[11] Waseem M, Al-Sherbeeni S, Al-Malki MH, et al. Burkholderia gladioli associated abscess in a type 1 diabetic patient[J]. Saudi Med J, 2008, 29(7): 1048-1050.
[12] Church AC, Sivasothy P, Parmer J, et al. Mediastinal abscess after lung transplantation secondary to Burkholderia gladioli infection[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2009, 28(5): 511-514. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.019.
[13] Lestin F, Kraak R, Podbielski A. Two cases of keratitis and corneal ulcers caused by Burkholderia gladioli[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2008, 46(7): 2445-2449. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02442-07.
[14] Kennedy MP, Coakley RD, Donaldson SH, et al. Burkholderia gladioli: five year experience in a cystic fibrosis and lung transplantation center[J]. J Cyst Fibros, 2007, 6(4): 267-273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2006.10.007.
[15] Boyanton BL Jr, Noroski LM, et al. Burkholderia gladioli osteomyelitis in association with chronic gra- nulomatous disease: case report and review[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2005, 24(9): 837-839. DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000177285.44374.dc.
[16] Ritterband D, Shah M, Cohen K, et al. Burkholderia gladioli keratitis associated with consecutive recurrent endophthalmitis[J]. Cornea, 2002, 21(6): 602-603. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200208000-00014.
[17] Shin JH, Kim SH, Shin MG, et al. Bacteremia due to Burkholderia gladioli: case report[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1997, 25(5): 1264-1265. DOI: 10.1086/cid.1997.25.issue-5.
[18] Graves M, Robin T, Chipman AM, et al. Four additional cases of Burkholderia gladioli infection with microbiological correlates and review[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1997, 25(4): 838-842. DOI: 10.1086/cid.1997.25.issue-4.
[19] Kanj SS, Tapson V, Davis RD, et al. Infections in patients with cystic fibrosis following lung transplantation[J]. Chest, 1997, 112(4): 924-930. DOI: 10.1378/chest.112.4.924.
[20] Wilsher ML, Kolbe J, Morris AJ, et al. Nosocomial acquisition of Burkholderia gladioli in patients with cystic fibrosis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1997, 155(4): 1436-1440. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105090.
[21] Hoare S, Cant AJ. Chronic granulomatous disease presenting as severe sepsis due to Burkholderia gla- dioli[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1996, 23(2): 411. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/23.2.411.
[22] Ross JP, Holland SM, Gill VJ, et al. Severe Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) gladioli infection in chronic granulo- matous disease: report of two successfully treated cases[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1995, 21(5): 1291-1293. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/21.5.1291.
[23] Khan SU, Gordon SM, Stillwell PC, et al. Empyema and bloodstream infection caused by Burkholderia gladioli in a patient with cystic fibrosis after lung transplantation[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1996, 15(7): 637-639. DOI: 10.1097/00006454-199607000-00020.
[24] Christenson JC, Welch DF, Mukwaya G, et al. Reco- very of Pseudomonas gladioli from respiratory tract specimens of patients with cystic fibrosis[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1989, 27(2): 270-273.