文章快速检索  
  高级检索
内蒙古崇根山蛇绿岩中铬铁矿特征及其构造意义
王成1, 任利民2, 张晓军3, 余国飞4, 方磊5     
1. 新疆地质调查院, 乌鲁木齐 830000;
2. 中国地质大学(武汉)地球科学学院, 武汉 430074;
3. 中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院, 武汉 430074;
4. 湖北省地质局第一地质大队, 湖北 黄石 435100;
5. 江西省核工业地质局266大队, 南昌 330038
摘要: 为探讨内蒙古贺根山蛇绿岩形成时的物化条件和大地构造环境,选取崇根山蛇绿岩块中未蚀变副矿物铬铁矿进行矿物学和矿物地球化学分析。结果表明:铬铁矿成分均一,不发育环带结构;铬铁矿中的Cr2O3质量分数为38.86%~39.12%,Al2O3质量分数为26.56%~26.92%,TFeO质量分数为17.37%~17.50%,Cr#为49.34~49.58,Mg#为68.82~69.73,Yfe为6.62~6.97,Fe2+#为30.27~31.18,为富镁铝铬铁矿,其寄主岩石为蛇绿岩;铬铁矿结晶平均温度为1 396.88℃,平均压力为3.35 GPa,推断其形成深度约为103.72 km;相对于FMQ(fayalite magnetite quartz)缓冲剂的地幔氧逸度为FMQ+1.41~FMQ+1.45 lg单位(平均值为FMQ+1.43 lg单位);地幔熔融程度为20.93%~20.95%(平均值为20.94%)。推测崇根山铬铁矿原岩橄榄岩单元源区为石榴石二辉橄榄岩,形成于亏损地幔。崇根山蛇绿岩为消减带型蛇绿岩,可能产自俯冲带环境中的洋内弧后盆地环境。
关键词: 铬铁矿    蛇绿岩    弧后盆地    崇根山    贺根山    
Characteristics and Tectonic Significance of Chromites from Chonggenshan Ophiolite in Inner Mongolia
Wang Cheng1, Ren Limin2, Zhang Xiaojun3, Yu Guofei4, Fang Lei5     
1. Xinjiang Geological Survey Academy, Urumchi 830000, China;
2. School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
3. Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
4. No. 1 Geological Party of Hubei Geological Bureau, Huangshi 435100, Hubei, China;
5. No. 266 Geological Party of Jiangxi Nuclear Industrial Geological Bureau, Nanchang 330038, China
Abstract: In order to analyze the formation physicochemical conditions and tectonic environment of the Hegenshan ophiolite in Inner Mongolia, the unaltered chromites from the Chonggenshan ophiolite were chosen to study their mineralogy and mineral geochemistry. The result shows that the chromites consist of Cr2O3 (38.86%-39.12%), Al2O3 (26.56%-26.92%), and TFeO (17.37%-17.50%), Cr# values of 49.34-49.58, Mg#values of 68.82-69.73, Yfe values of 6.62-6.97, and Fe2+#values of 30.27-31.18, without texture zoning. They are aluminum-rich chromites. The average crystallization temperature and pressure of the chromite are estimated to be 1 396.88℃ and 3.35 GPa, respectively, indicating its formation depth of about 103.72 km. It is inferred that the Chonggenshan chromite-hosting peridotite was derived from the garnet lherzolites in depleted upper mantle with oxygen fugacities from FMQ+1.41 to FMQ+1.45 lg units (average FMQ +1.43 lg units), and partial melting degree of the mantle from 20.93% to 20.95% (average 20.94%). The chromites show the characteristics of super-subduction zone. We believe that the Chonggenshan ophiolite was formed in the background of intra-oceanic back-arc basin in the subduction zone.
Key words: chromite    ophiolite    intra-oceanic back-arc basin    Chonggenshan    Hegenshan    

0 引言

蛇绿岩标志着板块碰撞的缝合线或者是增生碰撞带, 对于研究古大洋岩石圈的地球化学性质和造山带的演化具有重要作用[1], 主要分为MORB(mid-ocean ridge,大洋中脊)型和SSZ (supra-subduction zone,消减带)型[2-4]。在内蒙古中北部由北到南发育着4条蛇绿岩带, 分别为二连浩特—贺根山蛇绿岩带、交其尔—锡林浩特蛇绿岩带、索伦敖包—林西蛇绿岩带和温都尔庙—西拉木伦河蛇绿岩带[5-6], 贺根山蛇绿岩位于最北部的二连浩特—贺根山蛇绿岩带上[6-9]。贺根山蛇绿岩作为构造岩浆作用过程的记录, 能为地幔作用研究、岩石圈增生与裂解过程探讨、板块碰撞和构造环境恢复提供大量有用信息,对于解决内蒙古北部地质构造和演化历史等重大基础地质问题具有重要意义,并已获得广大学者的广泛关注[6-13]。目前贺根山蛇绿岩形成环境还没有达成一致共识, 存在着大洋中脊成因[10-11]和消减带成因[6, 8, 13-24]的争论, 还有少数学者认为可能是超镁铁质成因[12], 但多数学者认为产生于俯冲消减带环境。

铬铁矿相对于其他岩浆成因矿物更加稳定, 其特征参数Cr# 、Mg#、Fe3+#和Fe2+#的变化范围, Al2O3、Cr2O3、MgO、Fe2O3和TiO2等主要氧化物的含量、变化与铬铁矿形成时所处构造环境密切相关, 可以为寄主岩石成因、地幔特征及铬铁矿形成时的大地构造环境的判断提供可靠依据[25-29], 对于蛇绿岩类型的判别至关重要[26, 30]

贺根山蛇绿岩由贺根山、河北农场、吉斯布敦、哈日海陶勒盖和崇根山等5大蛇绿岩块组成, 其共同组成了由地幔橄榄岩、镁铁质堆晶岩、侵入杂岩、气孔杏仁状玄武岩和放射虫硅质岩构成的完整蛇绿岩套。目前,前人的研究主要针对发育有豆荚状铬铁矿的贺根山蛇绿岩块, 而对崇根山蛇绿岩块研究相对较少, 且主要集中于岩石学、岩石地球化学和同位素定年方面[14-15, 21, 31-32], 对于橄榄岩中赋存的副矿物铬铁矿研究尚属空白。本文主要从铬铁矿矿物地球化学特征的角度探讨寄主橄榄岩形成的构造环境, 以期为二连浩特—贺根山缝合带的构造演化提供地球化学证据。

1 地质背景

崇根山蛇绿岩块位于二连浩特—贺根山缝合带中段(图 1), 为贺根山蛇绿岩中出露面积最大(超过300 km2)、岩性组合最为齐全的蛇绿岩块(图 2)。崇根山蛇绿岩块北端出露的地层有石炭系—二叠系格根敖包组(C-Pg)[34-35]海相火山岩和中二叠统哲斯组(P2z)[36-38]滨海—浅海相正常沉积碎屑岩, 蛇绿岩块与哲斯组为断层接触, 被格根敖包组喷发不整合覆盖; 南端出露中—上泥盆统塔尔巴格特组(D2-3t)[39]海相浅变质程度的砂板岩, 其角度不整合覆盖于蛇绿岩块之上; 其余大部分地段被新生代上新统宝格达乌拉组(N2b)陆相松散堆积物或第四系(Q)残坡积物与冲洪积物覆盖。崇根山蛇绿岩块主要由地幔橄榄岩、少量堆晶辉长-辉绿质岩墙和拉斑玄武岩片组成, 相互之间呈断层接触。地幔橄榄岩主要为方辉橄榄岩、纯橄榄岩和二辉橄榄岩, 岩石蛇纹石化蚀变十分强烈且普遍, 相互之间为断层接触(图 2)。其岩块北部以强蛇纹石化方辉橄榄岩和纯橄榄岩为主, 而南部则除了前述的岩片外, 还有大量的二辉橄榄岩。堆晶辉长-辉绿质岩墙出露虽然零星, 且叠加了后期绿帘石—角闪岩相的变质作用, 但其堆晶特征清晰, 是构成本区蛇绿岩套的重要组成部分[13, 33](图 3)。崇根山蛇绿岩块中副矿物铬铁矿较为常见, 但至今未见到有豆荚状铬铁矿的报道。本次研究的副矿物铬铁矿主要发育于崇根山强蛇纹石化方辉橄榄岩中。

a.据文献[6]修编;b.据文献[7-9]修编。 图 1 崇根山区域地质图 Fig. 1 Regional geological map of the Chonggenshan area
据文献[12-13, 33]修编。 图 2 崇根山蛇绿岩块地质简图 Fig. 2 Sketch geological map of the Chonggenshan ophiolite
据文献[33]修编。 图 3 崇根山蛇绿岩中堆晶辉长-辉绿质岩墙实测地质剖面图 Fig. 3 Geologic section of cumulate gabbro-diabase dyke of the Chonggenshan ophiolite
2 岩石矿物学特征

方辉橄榄岩为崇根山地幔橄榄岩的主体, 出露面积大且连续, 约占蛇绿岩块出露总面积的50%, 抗风化能力较强, 宏观为山丘(图 4a)。方辉橄榄岩灰绿—暗绿色, 具粒状结构, 块状构造, 由橄榄石(80%~85%)、斜方辉石(10%~15%)和单斜辉石(2%)组成(图 4b)。橄榄石半自形粒状, 大小1.0~2.5 mm, 多已发生强蛇纹石化, 形成特征的网格构造, 裂隙面发育纤蛇纹石, 表面发育薄层利蛇纹石;斜方辉石半自形粒状, 大小1.0~6.0 mm, 填隙状分布在橄榄石之间, 多发生滑石化、闪石化和蛇纹石化;单斜辉石较少, 他形粒状, 大小0.5~2.0 mm, 填隙状分布。副矿物为铬铁矿(2%), 粒径0.05~1.50 mm, 他形, 多为近似椭圆状, 环带不发育, 分布于蛇纹石(化矿物)间, 正交偏光镜下全消光, 在单偏光镜下颗粒中心部位到边缘部位均为暗灰色, 未见明显的颜色差异, 铬铁矿中裂隙不发育。

a.片理化方辉橄榄岩; b.方辉橄榄岩(单偏光); c,d.铬铁矿(背散射)。Ol.橄榄石; Opx.斜方辉石; Sep.蛇纹石; Chr.铬铁矿。 图 4 研究区野外及显微照片 Fig. 4 Photographs of ophiolite outcrops and microphotographs of the Chonggenshan ophiolite
3 测试结果

崇根山副矿物铬铁矿基本无蚀变, 成分较均一, 未见明显的环带特征。本文选取新鲜无蚀变铬铁矿进行了电子探针分析, 测试工作在中国地质大学(武汉)地质过程与矿产资源国家重点实验室完成, 实验仪器型号为JXA-8 100, 分析条件为加速电压15 kV, 束流100 nA, 电子束径1 μm, 工作精度达100×10-6。Fe价态对于下文铝铬铁矿温度、压力和氧逸度等物化条件的计算至关重要, 需将电子探针数据中TFeO折算成FeO和Fe2O3, 本文利用化学式(AB2O4)和电价平衡计算出Fe2+和Fe3+摩尔分数, 再以4个氧原子为基础, 计算求得全部样品的阳离子数[17, 29]。分析和计算结果见表 1

表 1 崇根山铬铁矿测试数据 Table 1 Analytical results of podiform chromites from the Chonggenshan ophiolite 
点位号TFeOTiO2SiO2MgOAl2O3Cr2O3MnOCoONiOV2O3Na2OK2OCaO总和
CG-1-117.500.420.0215.3626.9239.120.240.000.100.200.030.000.0099.90
CG-1-217.470.420.0215.2726.7839.100.240.000.110.210.020.000.0099.63
CG-1-317.440.430.0215.0926.7338.900.240.000.110.220.010.010.0199.17
CG-1-417.440.410.0215.2226.8138.960.240.000.110.210.020.010.0099.43
CG-2-117.490.420.0115.1626.6839.100.240.000.120.210.010.000.0099.45
CG-2-217.490.420.0215.1926.7438.990.240.000.110.210.010.000.0099.43
CG-2-317.380.430.0215.2126.7938.880.230.000.110.200.020.010.0199.27
CG-3-117.430.420.0215.1826.7738.990.240.000.110.210.010.000.0099.39
CG-3-217.430.410.0215.2826.7539.080.240.000.110.200.020.000.0099.53
CG-3-317.390.410.0215.1626.7038.940.230.000.110.210.010.010.0199.19
CG-4-117.370.420.0115.0126.5638.860.230.000.120.210.000.010.0198.80

崇根山铬铁矿Cr2O3质量分数为38.86%~39.12%, 平均值为38.99%;A12O3质量分数为26.56%~26.92%, 平均值为26.75%;TFeO质量分数为17.37%~17.50%, 平均值为17.44%(表 1); 崇根山铬铁矿Cr#为49.34~49.58, 平均值为49.45;Mg#为68.82~69.73, 平均值为69.31;Yfe为6.62~6.97, 平均值为6.81;Fe2+#为30.27~31.18, 平均值为30.69(表 2)。在铬铁矿分类图(图 5)中显示为富镁铝铬铁矿, 与贺根山蛇绿岩块豆荚状铬铁矿主体为铝铬铁矿、少数为富铬尖晶石和铬铁矿的情况明显不同[17]

表 2 崇根山铬铁矿计算参数 Table 2 Related parameters of podiform chromites from the Chonggenshan ophiolite
点位号Fe2+Fe3+TiSiMgAlCrMnCoNiVNaKCaCr#Mg#YfeFe2+#p/GPaH/kmt/℃Δlg(fo2)FMQF/%
CG-1-10.5890.4170.0370.0031.3562.8172.7470.0120.0000.0050.0150.0010.0000.00049.3769.736.9730.273.35103.731 397.201.4520.93
CG-1-20.5940.4120.0370.0021.3532.8132.7560.0120.0000.0050.0150.0010.0000.00049.4969.496.8930.513.35103.781 396.901.4420.94
CG-1-30.6050.4000.0380.0021.3442.8222.7560.0120.0000.0050.0150.0010.0000.00049.4168.946.6831.063.34103.631 396.801.4120.94
CG-1-40.5940.4120.0370.0001.3512.8212.7520.0120.0000.0050.0150.0010.0000.00049.3769.466.8830.543.34103.691 397.101.4420.93
CG-2-10.6020.4050.0380.0021.3472.812.7630.0120.0000.0060.0150.0010.0000.00049.5869.126.7830.883.35103.811 396.601.4320.95
CG-2-20.5980.4110.0370.0021.3492.8152.7540.0120.0000.0050.0150.0010.0000.00049.4569.296.8630.713.35103.741 396.901.4420.94
CG-2-30.5960.4060.0390.0031.3522.8232.7490.0120.0000.0050.0150.0010.0000.00049.3469.406.7930.603.34103.621 397.101.4320.93
CG-3-10.5990.4050.0370.0021.3492.8192.7550.0120.0000.0050.0150.0010.0000.00049.4369.246.7730.763.34103.681 396.901.4320.94
CG-3-20.5920.4140.0370.0021.3552.8112.7560.0120.0000.0060.0150.0010.0000.00049.5169.626.9130.383.35103.811 396.901.4420.95
CG-3-30.5980.4060.0370.0021.352.8172.7570.0120.0000.0060.0150.0010.0000.00049.4669.296.7830.713.35103.721 396.801.4320.94
CG-4-10.6080.3960.0380.0011.3422.8162.7650.0120.0000.0060.0150.0000.0000.00149.5568.826.6231.183.35103.711 396.501.4120.95
注:Cr#=100 Cr/(Cr+Al);Mg#=100 Mg/(Mg+Fe2+);Yfe=100 Fe3+/(Fe3++Al+Cr);Fe2+#=100 Fe2+/(Fe2++Mg),其中Cr、Al、Mg、Fe2+、Fe3+为阳离子数目。平均值:Cr#为49.45,Mg#为69.31,Yfe为6.81,Fe2+#为30.69, p为3.35 GPa,H为103.72 km,t为1 396.88 ℃,Δlg(fo2)FMQ为FMQ+1.43 lg单位,F为20.94%。
1.高铁铬铁矿; 2.富铁铬铁矿; 3.富镁铝铬铁矿; 4.富铁富铬尖晶石; 5.富铁铝富铬尖晶石; 6.富铁铝尖晶石; 7.铬尖晶石; 8.富铝铬尖晶石; 9.富铬尖晶石; 10.铝铬铁矿; 11.铬铁矿; 12.高铁富铬尖晶石。底图据文献[40]。 图 5 研究区铬铁矿分类图 Fig. 5 Classification of chromites from the Chonggenshan ophiolite
4 讨论 4.1 原岩性质判定

铬铁矿成分环带产生的原因有两种, 一种是岩浆结晶分异[41], 另一种是超基性岩浆成因, 即超基性岩经受变质作用、不同物质组成对应不同变质相的结果[42]。原生铬铁矿也可以不发育环带, 随着铬铁矿自形程度的降低和粒度变细, 成分环带逐渐消失[43]。原生铬铁矿受到后期蚀变改造后, 核部到边部Fe的质量分数会逐渐升高, Cr和Mg的质量分数会变化, 蚀变越强,Fe质量分数越高, 当完全蚀变后, 铬铁矿会变成褐铁矿和磁铁矿。一般而言, 后期遭受蚀变的铬铁矿通常会发育成分分带, 除非铬铁矿毫无残留全部蚀变(褐铁矿和磁铁矿)。本文所测试铬铁矿为高镁铬铁矿, 铁质量分数较低, 未见明显环带特征, 成分较为均一, 颗粒间无明显变化, 未发生明显蚀变, 表明各颗粒处于平衡状态[44], 同时裂隙也不发育, 表明副矿物铬铁矿在崇根山蛇绿岩后期俯冲就位的过程中受到的改造较少, 可以代表原始的铬铁矿,并且可以用于本文后续的参数计算和相关论证分析。

在Cr#-Mg#构造环境判别图解(图 6)中, 崇根山铬铁矿主要位于俯冲带(SSZ)型蛇绿岩、阿尔卑斯型地幔橄榄岩和深海橄榄岩的重叠部位。本文所测结果(Cr#=49.34~49.58和Mg#=68.82~69.73), 显示出该区橄榄岩既不同于典型的大洋上地幔物质, 也与标准的大陆上地幔成因有区别, 与纽芬兰岛湾蛇绿岩和阿曼赛迈尔蛇绿岩相似[26, 45]。根据以上判断结果,认为铬铁矿的寄主原岩方辉橄榄岩应属于蛇绿岩成员, 这和区域上前人研究成果一致[6, 8, 10-11, 13-24]

底图据文献[26, 45-46]。 图 6 研究区Cr#-Mg#形成环境判别图 Fig. 6 Cr#-Mg# discrimination diagram of chromites formed in various environments in the study area
4.2 地幔源区性质

根据O’Neill[47]提出的铬铁矿压力计算公式, 计算得到崇根山铬铁矿结晶压力为3.34~3.35 GPa, 其平均值为3.35 GPa, 推测其形成深度H(31p)约为103.72 km。

根据Fabriès[48]提出的温度计算公式,得出崇根山铬铁矿结晶温度t(T-273.15)平均值为1 396.88 ℃。软流圈温度为1 280~1 350 ℃[49], 与本文通过铬铁矿计算出来的结果很接近,由此推测铬铁矿寄主岩石形成于地幔环境, 处于石榴石二辉橄榄岩的稳定相区内(图 7), 即铬铁矿寄主橄榄岩方辉橄榄岩原岩为石榴石二辉橄榄岩。

a.底图据文献[50];b.底图据文献[51]。 图 7 研究区石榴石二辉橄榄岩与尖晶石二辉橄榄岩相转变图(a)和无水地幔温度压力图解(b) Fig. 7 Phase transition from garnet lherzolite to spinel lherzolite in the CMAS system(a) and pressure-temperature diagram for the melting of anhydrous mantle lherzolite (b) in the study area

联合采用Irvine[41]、Fabriès[48]和Fudali[52]提出的氧逸度公式,计算得出崇根山铬铁矿相对氧逸度Δlg(fo2)FMQ为FMQ +1.41~FMQ+1.45 lg单位, 平均值为FMQ+1.43 lg单位。

选用Hellebrand等[53]提出的部分熔融公式进行计算, 估算崇根山铬铁矿部分熔融程度F为20.93%~20.95%, 平均值为20.94%(表 2)。

4.3 构造环境讨论

在Cr#-Mg#形成环境判别图(图 6)中, 铬铁矿位于SSZ蛇绿岩区域(图 6b), 又处于深海橄榄岩范围内(图 6a)。在判别地幔亏损程度的Cr#-w(TiO2)关系图(图 8a)中, 可以看出铬铁矿落入亏损地幔橄榄岩与洋中脊玄武岩过渡区域, 更加偏向于洋中脊玄武岩区。在w(TiO2)-w(Al2O3)构造环境判别关系图(图 8b)中, 铬铁矿主要落入俯冲带橄榄岩(SSZP)、大洋中脊橄榄岩(MORP)和现代弧后盆地中尖晶石(BAB)中的重叠区域。在Fe2+/Fe3+-w(Al2O3)图解(图 9)中, 铬铁矿落入洋中脊型橄榄岩区域。同时, 铬铁矿的Fe3+/ Fe2+范围为(0.65~0.71)>0.5, 与贺根山豆荚状铬铁矿区别较大[17]; TiO2和Al2O3质量分数负相关关系不明显, 特征明显不同于来自典型MORB的铬尖晶石[56]

a.底图据文献[54];b.底图据文献[27]。 图 8 研究区铬铁矿Cr#-w(TiO2)亏损程度判别图(a)和w(TiO2)-w(Al2O3)关系构造环境判别图(b) Fig. 8 Discriminant diagram of Cr#-w(TiO2)(a)and tectonic setting discrimination diagram of w(TiO2)-w(Al2O3) (b) for chromites in the study area
底图据文献[55]。 图 9 研究区铬铁矿Fe2+/Fe3+-w(Al2O3)图解 Fig. 9 Discriminant diagram of Fe2+/Fe3+-w(Al2O3) for chromites from the Chonggenshan ophiolite

王成等[17]对贺根山蛇绿岩块中的豆荚状铬铁矿进行了研究,其选矿铬尖晶石的各项参数(结晶温度与压力、形成深度、氧逸度和地幔熔融程度等)与本文获得的结果十分接近,可进行对比,说明二者形成于相同的构造环境。结合区域构造背景,同时加强其他区域典型蛇绿岩的对比[57], 认为崇根山蛇绿岩为SSZ型, 形成于俯冲带环境中洋内弧后盆地环境。

5 结论

1) 崇根山铬铁矿主要以副矿物的形式存在, 蚀变程度弱, 为高镁铝铬铁矿。

2) 崇根山铬铁矿的结晶温度为1 396.50~1 397.20 ℃, 平均值为1 396.88 ℃; 结晶压力为3.34~3.35 GPa, 平均值为3.35 GPa, 推测其形成深度为103.72 km; 所处的地幔氧逸度为FMQ +1.41~FMQ+1.45 lg单位, 平均值为FMQ+1.43 lg单位; F为20.93%~20.95%, 平均值为20.94%。

3) 崇根山铬铁矿的寄主岩石方辉橄榄岩属于蛇绿岩成员, 原岩为石榴石二辉橄榄岩。

4) 崇根山蛇绿岩为SSZ型蛇绿岩, 形成于俯冲带环境中洋内弧后盆地环境。

参考文献
[1]
Xu J F, Castillo P R, Li X H, et al. MORB-Type Rocks from the Paleo-Tethyan Mian-Lueyang Northern Ophiolite in the Qinling Mountains, Central China:Implications for the Source of the Low 206Pb/204Pb and High 143Nd/144Nd Mantle Component in the Indian Ocean[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 198(3/4): 323-337.
[2]
Pearce J A, Lippard S J, Roberts S. Characteristics and Tectonic Significance of Supra-Subduction Zone Ophiolites[J]. Geological Society, 1984, 16(1): 77-94. DOI:10.1144/GSL.SP.1984.016.01.06
[3]
史仁灯. 蛇绿岩研究进展、存在问题及思考[J]. 地质论评, 2005, 51(6): 681-693.
Shi Rendeng. Comment on the Progress in and Problems on Ophiolite Study[J]. Geological Review, 2005, 51(6): 681-693. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2005.06.010
[4]
周国庆. 蛇绿岩研究新进展及其定义和分类的再讨论[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 2008, 44(1): 1-24.
Zhou Guoqing. Ophiolite:Some Key Aspects Regarding Its Definition and Classification[J]. Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Sciences), 2008, 44(1): 1-24.
[5]
李朋武, 高锐, 管烨, 等. 内蒙古中部索伦-林西缝合带封闭时代的古地磁分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(5): 744-758.
Li Pengwu, Gao Rui, Guan Ye, et al. Palaeomagnetic Constraints on the Final Closure Time of Solonker-Linxi Suture[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(5): 744-758.
[6]
Miao L C, Fan W M, Liu D Y, et al. Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Hegenshan Ophiolitic Complex:Implications for Late-Stage Tectonic Evolution of the Inner Mongolia-Daxinganling Orogenic Belt, China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2008, 32(5/6): 348-370.
[7]
Xiao W J, Windley B F, Hao J, et al. Accretion Leading to Collision and the Permian Solonker Suture, Inner Mongolia, China:Termination of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J]. Tectonics, 2003, 22(6): 1069.
[8]
王树庆, 许继峰, 刘希军, 等. 内蒙朝克山蛇绿岩地球化学:洋内弧后盆地的产物?[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(12): 2869-2879.
Wang Shuqing, Xu Jifeng, Liu Xijun, et al. Geochemistry of the Chaokeshan Ophiolite:Product of Intra-Oceanic Back-Arc Basin?[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2008, 24(12): 2869-2879.
[9]
Zhang X H, Yuan L L, Xue F H, et al. Early Permian A-Type Granites from Central Inner Mongolia, North China:Magmatic Tracer of Post-Collisional Tectonics and Oceanic Crustal Recycling[J]. Gondwana Research, 2015, 28(1): 311-327. DOI:10.1016/j.gr.2014.02.011
[10]
包志伟, 陈森煌, 张祯堂. 内蒙古贺根山地区蛇绿岩稀土元素和Sm-Nd同位素研究[J]. 地球化学, 1994, 23(4): 339-349.
Bao Zhiwei, Chen Senhuang, Zhang Zhentang. Study on Ree and Sm-Nd Isotopes of Hegenshan Ophiolite, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geochimica, 1994, 23(4): 339-349. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1994.04.004
[11]
Nozaka T, Liu Y. Petrology of the Hegenshan Ophiolite and Its Implication for the Tectonic Evolution of Northern China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 202(1): 89-104. DOI:10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00774-4
[12]
Jian P, Kr ner A, Windley B F, et al. Carboniferous and Cretaceous Mafic-Ultramafic Massifs in Inner Mongolia (China):A SHRIMP Zircon and Geochemical Study of the Previously Presumed Integral "Hegenshan Ophiolite"[J]. Lithos, 2012, 142/143: 48-66. DOI:10.1016/j.lithos.2012.03.007
[13]
黄波, 付冬, 李树才, 等. 内蒙古贺根山蛇绿岩形成时代及构造启示[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(1): 158-176.
Huang Bo, Fu Dong, Li Shucai, et al. The Age and Tectonic Implications of the Hegenshan Ophiolite in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2016, 32(1): 158-176.
[14]
王成.内蒙古贺根山地区成矿规律和成矿预测[D].武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉), 2015: 34-36.
Wang Cheng. TheMetallogenetic Regularities and Predictions in Hegenshan, Inner Mongolia[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 2015: 34-36.
[15]
王成, 田江涛, 李大海, 等. 内蒙古贺根山地区蛇绿岩空间展布特征及找矿方向[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2016, 28(5): 131-134.
Wang Cheng, Tian Jiangtao, Li Dahai, et al. The Spatially Distributing Feature and Prospecting Direction of Ophiolite in Hegenshan, Inner Mongolia[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2016, 28(5): 131-134. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2016.05.041
[16]
王成, 田江涛, 李大海, 等. 内蒙古贺根山地区VMS型铜矿成矿地质特征及找矿方向[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2016, 28(6): 153-156.
Wang Cheng, Tian Jiangtao, Li Dahai, et al. The Metallogenic Geological Characteristics and Prospecting Direction of VMS Copper Deposits in Hegenshan, Inner Mongolia[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2016, 28(6): 153-156. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2016.06.049
[17]
王成, 任利民, 张晓军, 等. 内蒙古贺根山蛇绿岩中铬铁矿特征及大地构造环境[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2018, 37(1): 140-148.
Wang Cheng, Ren Limin, Zhang Xiaojun, et al. Characteristics and Tectonic Environment of Chromites from the Hegenshan Ophiolite in Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2018, 37(1): 140-148.
[18]
王成, 任利民, 张晓军, 等. 内蒙古贺根山蛇绿岩中玄武岩锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 2018, 33(4): 617-626.
Wang Cheng, Ren Limin, Zhang Xiaojun, et al. Zircon U-Pb Age and Geochemical Characteristics of Basalt of the Hegenshan Ophiolite in Inner Mongolia and the Geological Significance[J]. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2018, 33(4): 617-626.
[19]
王成, 任利民, 张晓军, 等. 内蒙古贺根山地区早白垩世花岗斑岩时代、成因及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2018, 37(10): 1882-1894.
Wang Cheng, Ren Limin, Zhang Xiaojun, et al. Ages, Origin and Geological Implications of Early Cretaceous Granite Porphyry in Hegen Mountain, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(10): 1882-1894.
[20]
王成, 任利民, 张晓军, 等. 内蒙古贺根山地区早二叠世二长花岗岩时代、成因及构造意义[J]. 新疆地质, 2018, 36(2): 159-168.
Wang Cheng, Ren Limin, Zhang Xiaojun, et al. Ages, Origin and Geological Implications of Adamellite in Early Permian in Hegenshan, Inner Mongolia[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2018, 36(2): 159-168.
[21]
王成, 任利民, 张晓军, 等. 内蒙古崇根山蛇绿岩前弧玄武岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3): 1-11.
Wang Cheng, Ren Limin, Zhang Xiaojun, et al. Discovery and Significance of the Fore-Arc Basalts from the Chonggenshan Ophiolitein Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(3): 1-11.
[22]
王成, 任利民, 余国飞, 等. 内蒙古贺根山蛇绿岩中方辉橄榄岩岩石地球化学特征及构造环境分析[J]. 新疆地质, 2019, 37(2): 156-166.
Wang Cheng, Ren Limin, Yu Guofei, et al. Geochemical Characteristics and Tectonic Setting of Harzburgite from Hegenshan Ophiolitic Block in Inner Mongolia[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2019, 37(2): 156-166. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2019.02.003
[23]
龙雄志, 郭锋, 赵亮, 等. 内蒙古贺根山蛇纹岩化流体来源的H-O-B同位素地球化学制约[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2017, 41(3): 590-603.
Long Xiongzhi, Guo Feng, Zhao Liang, et al. H-O-BIsotopic Constraints on Fluid Origin of Serpentinization of the Hegenshan Ophiolite, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2017, 41(3): 590-603.
[24]
李英杰, 王金芳, 王根厚, 等. 内蒙古迪彦庙蛇绿岩带达哈特前弧玄武岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(2): 469-482.
Li Yingjie, Wang Jinfang, Wang Genhou, et al. Discovery and Significance of the Dahate Fore-Arc Basalts from the Diyanmiao Ophiolite in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2018, 34(2): 469-482.
[25]
Irvine T N. Chromian Spinel as a Petrogenetic Indicator:Part 2:Petrologic Applications[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1967, 4(1): 71-103. DOI:10.1139/e67-004
[26]
Dick H J B, Bullen T. Chromian Spinel as a Petrogenetic Indicator in Abyssal and Alpine-Type Peridotites and Spatially Associated Lavas[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1984, 86(1): 54-76.
[27]
Kamenetsky V S, Crawford A J, Meffre S. Factors Controlling Chemistry of Magmatic Spinel:An Empirical Study of Associated Olivine, Cr-Spinel and Melt Inclusions from Primitive Rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2001, 42(4): 655-671. DOI:10.1093/petrology/42.4.655
[28]
杨经绥, 徐向珍, 戎合, 等. 蛇绿岩地幔橄榄岩中的深部矿物:发现与研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2013, 32(2): 159-170.
Yang Jingsui, Xu Xiangzhen, Rong He, et al. Deep Minerals in Ophiolitic Mantle Peridotites:Discovery and Progress[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2013, 32(2): 159-170. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2013.02.002
[29]
王成, 田江涛, 李大海, 等. 东天山大草滩蛇纹岩中铬铁矿特征及其构造意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2018, 37(2): 270-280.
Wang Cheng, Tian Jiangtao, Li Dahai, et al. Characteristics and Tectonic Significance of Chromites from Dacaotan Serpentinite of East Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Petrologicaet Mineralogica, 2018, 37(2): 270-280. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2018.02.007
[30]
Arai S. Characterization of Spinel Peridotites by Olivine-Spinel Compositional Relationships:Review and Interpretation[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 113(3/4): 191-204.
[31]
段明, 魏佳林, 张锋, 等. 内蒙古东乌旗地区崇根山岩块找矿预测[J]. 矿物学报, 2015, 35(增刊1): 112.
Duan Ming, Wei Jialin, Zhang Feng, et al. The Prospecting Prediction of Chonggenshan Ophiolite in Dong Ujimqin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2015, 35(Sup.1): 112.
[32]
段明, 郗爱华, 孙国胜, 等. 内蒙古东乌旗地区崇根山岩块超基性岩地球化学特征[J]. 世界地质, 2016, 35(3): 653-665.
Duan Ming, Xi Aihua, Sun Guosheng, et al. Geochemical Characteristics of Chonggenshan Ultrabasic Rocks of Dong Ujimqin in Inner Mongolia[J]. Global Geology, 2016, 35(3): 653-665. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2016.03.006
[33]
任利民, 葛梦春, 谢德凡, 等. 1: 50000硝泡子等五幅区域地质调查报告[R].武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉)地质调查院, 2017.
Ren Limin, Ge Mengchun, Xie Defan, et al.The Report of Regional Geological Survey to Five 1/50000 International Standard Maps Represented by Xiaopaozi[R]. Wuhan: Geological Survey Institute of China Universityof Geosciences(Wuhan), 2017.
[34]
朱俊宾, 孙立新, 任纪舜, 等. 内蒙古东乌旗地区格根敖包组火山岩锆石LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地球学报, 2015, 36(4): 466-472.
Zhu Junbin, Sun Lixin, Ren Jishun, et al. LA-MC-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb Dating of the Volcanic Rocks from the Gegen Obo Formation in East Ujimqin Banner Area, Inner Mongolia, and Its Significance[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2015, 36(4): 466-472.
[35]
张渝金, 吴新伟, 江斌, 等. 大兴安岭扎兰屯地区格根敖包组碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 404-416.
Zhang Yujin, Wu Xinwei, Jiang Bin, et al. U-Pb Geochronology of Detrital Zircon and the Constraint of Geochemistry from the Gegen'aobao Formation in Middle of Zalantun Area of Da Hinggan Mountains and Its Tectonic Significance[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(2): 404-416.
[36]
王成源, 王平, 李文国. 内蒙古二叠系哲斯组的牙形刺及其时代[J]. 古生物学报, 2006, 45(2): 195-206.
Wang Chengyuan, Wang Ping, Li Wenguo. Conodonts from the Permian Jisu Honguer (Zhesi) Formation in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 2006, 45(2): 195-206. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0001-6616.2006.02.004
[37]
方俊钦, 赵盼, 徐备, 等. 内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗哲斯组宏体化石新发现和沉积相分析[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(7): 1889-1898.
Fang Junqin, Zhao Pan, Xu bei, et al. Sedimentary Facies Analyses and Discovery of Gastropods from Zhesi Formation in the South of West Ujimqin, Inner Mongolia and Their Significances[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(7): 1889-1898.
[38]
杨兵, 张雄华, 杨欣杰, 等. 内蒙古锡林浩特二叠系哲斯组腕足动物群特征及其意义[J]. 地质通报, 2017, 36(10): 1683-1690.
Yang Bing, Zhang Xionghua, Yang Xinjie, et al. Brachiopod Faunas from the Permian Jisu Honguer (Zhesi) Formation in Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, and Its Significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2017, 36(10): 1683-1690. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2017.10.001
[39]
李艳锋, 牛文超, 张天福, 等. 内蒙古东乌旗泥盆纪塔尔巴格特组凝灰岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 187-195.
Li Yanfeng, Niu Wenchao, Zhang Tianfu, et al. Zircon U-Pb Age of the Tuff from Devonian Tarbaget Formation in Dong Ujimqin Banner, Inner Mongolia, and Its Geological Implication[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2017, 36(2): 187-195. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2017.02.005
[40]
索科洛夫.乌拉尔铬铁矿[M].朱福湘, 李秉伦, 袁啟林, 译.北京: 地质出版社, 1958: 1-12.
Sokolov. Chromites in Uruguay[M]. Translated by Zhu Fuxiang, Li Binglun, Yuan Qilin.Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1958: 1-12.
[41]
Irvine T N. Chromian Spinel as a Petrogenetic Indicator:Part 1:Theory[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1965, 2(6): 648-672. DOI:10.1139/e65-046
[42]
Barnes S J, Roeder P L. The Range of Spinel Compositions in Ter-Restrial Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2001, 42(12): 2279-2302. DOI:10.1093/petrology/42.12.2279
[43]
李犇, 朱赖民, 弓虎军, 等. 北秦岭松树沟橄榄岩与铬铁矿矿床的成因关系[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(5): 1487-1502.
Li Ben, Zhu Laimin, Gong Hujun, et al. Genetic Relationship Between Peridotites and Chromite Deposit from Songshugou Area of North Qinling[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(5): 1487-1502.
[44]
Barnes S J. Chromite in Komatiites:Ⅱ:Modification During Greenschist to Mid-Amphibolite Facies Metamorphism[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2000, 41(3): 387-409. DOI:10.1093/petrology/41.3.387
[45]
朱云海, 张克信, 王国灿, 等. 东昆仑复合造山带蛇绿岩、岩浆岩及构造岩浆演化[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2002: 32-33.
Zhu Yunhai, Zhang Kexin, Wang Guocan, et al. Ophiolite, Magmatic Rock and Tectonic-Magmatic Evolution in Eastern Kunlun Orogenic Belt[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 2002: 32-33.
[46]
孔凡梅, 李旭平, 李守军, 等. 西南天山东德沟镁铁-超镁铁岩中尖晶石的矿物学特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2011, 30(5): 951-960.
Kong Fanmei, Li Xuping, Li Shoujun, et al. Mineralogy of Spinel from Mafic-Ultramafic Rocks in Dongdegou, Southwestern Tianshan and Its Geological Significance[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2011, 30(5): 951-960. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2011.05.016
[47]
O'Neill H S C. The Transition Between Spinel Lherzolite and Garnet Lherzolite, and Its Use as a Geobarometer[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1981, 77(2): 185-194.
[48]
Fabriès J. Spinel-Olivine Geothermometry in Peridotites from Ultramafic Complexes[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1979, 69(4): 329-336.
[49]
McKenzie D, Bickle M J. The Volume and Composition of Melt Generated by Extension of the Lithosphere[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1988, 29(3): 625-679. DOI:10.1093/petrology/29.3.625
[50]
Klemme S, O'Neill H S C. The Near-Solidus Transition from Garnet Lherzolite to Spinel Lherzolite[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2000, 138(3): 237-248.
[51]
张招崇, 王福生, 郝艳丽, 等. 峨眉山大火成岩省中苦橄岩与其共生岩石的地球化学特征及其对源区的约束[J]. 地质学报, 2004, 78(2): 171-180.
Zhang Zhaochong, Wang Fusheng, Hao Yanli, et al. Geochemistry of the Picrites and Associated Basalts from the Emeishan Large Igneous Basalt Province and Constraints on Their Source Region[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2004, 78(2): 171-180.
[52]
Fudali R F. Oxygen Fugacities of Basaltic and Andesitic Magmas[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1965, 29(9): 1063-1075. DOI:10.1016/0016-7037(65)90103-1
[53]
Hellebrand E, Snow J E, Dick H J B, et al. Coupled Major and Trace Elements as Indicators of the Extent of Melting in Mid-Ocean-Ridge Peridotites[J]. Nature, 2001, 410(8): 677-681.
[54]
Pal T, Mitra S. p-T-fO2 Controls on a Partly Inverse Chromite-Bearing Ultramafic Intrusive:An Evaluation from the Sukinda Massif, India[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2004, 22(5): 483-493. DOI:10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00088-9
[55]
Khalil K I, El-Makky A M. Alteration Mechanisms of Chromian-Spinel During Serpentinization at Wadi Sifein Area, Eastern Desert, Egypt[J]. Resource Geology, 2009, 59(2): 194-211.
[56]
Blanco G, Rajesh H M, Germs G J B, et al. Chemical Composition and Tectonic Setting of Chromian Spinels from the Ediacaran-Early Paleozoic Nama Group, Namibia[J]. The Journal of Geology, 2009, 117(3): 325-341. DOI:10.1086/597366
[57]
徐向珍, 杨经绥, 郭国林, 等. 雅鲁藏布江缝合带西段普兰蛇绿岩中地幔橄榄岩的岩石学研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(11): 3179-3196.
Xu Xiangzhen, Yang Jingsui, Guo Guolin, et al. Lithological Research on the Purang Mantle Peridotite in Western Yarlung-Zangbo Suture Zone in Tibet[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(11): 3179-3196.
http://dx.doi.org/10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180253
吉林大学主办、教育部主管的以地学为特色的综合性学术期刊
0

文章信息

王成, 任利民, 张晓军, 余国飞, 方磊
Wang Cheng, Ren Limin, Zhang Xiaojun, Yu Guofei, Fang Lei
内蒙古崇根山蛇绿岩中铬铁矿特征及其构造意义
Characteristics and Tectonic Significance of Chromites from Chonggenshan Ophiolite in Inner Mongolia
吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1552-1564
Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1552-1564.
http://dx.doi.org/10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180253

文章历史

收稿日期: 2018-10-02

相关文章

工作空间