Chinese Chemical Letters  2026, Vol. 37 Issue (3): 111445   PDF    
Enhanced anodic mass transfer enables interfacial Cl for efficient ammonia oxidation
Xia Chena, Ting Daia, Meng-Ying Yina, Xing-Yuan Xiaa, Qiu-Ju Xinga, Lei Tiana,b,*, Jian-Ping Zoua,*     
a Key Laboratory of Jiangxi Province for Persistent Pollutants Prevention Control and Resource Reuse, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China;
b School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Key Laboratory for Clean Energy and Materials, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China
Abstract: The electrostatic repulsion between the anode and ammonia (NH4+) can cause chlorine radicals (Cl) at the interface to self-compounding into low oxidating species, weakening the treatment performance of ammonia-nitrogen (NH4+-N) wastewater. This study introduces electron-rich elements into the tetrahedral sites (ATd2+) of spinel cobalt oxide (Co3O4) for efficient and selective NH4+-N mineralization induced by interfacial Cl. Batch experiments, in-situ characterizations, and theoretical calculations confirm that CuTd2+ have moderate energy level matching and strong binding energy with NH4+ compared to NiTd2+ and ZnTd2+. NH4+ can effectively overcome electrostatic repulsion and enrich on CuxCo3-xO4 anode. More importantly, the interaction of CuTd2+-O-CoOh3+ weakens the binding of Cl at CoOh3+ sites, promoting the desorption of Cl from the anodic interface. As a result, NH4+-N is mineralized by Cl into N2 with a rate of 4.4 × 102 min-1, superior to Co3O4 and commercial dimensionally stable anodes. Finally, the scale-up experiment using a continuous flow reactor realizes long-term stability for NH4+-N wastewater treatment, in which 100% of NH4+-N and 88.3% of total nitrogen can be continuously eliminated in 96 h. This study offers an in-depth understanding of interfacial reactions in the EC system and guides the design and synthesis of superior anodes for environmental remediation.
Keywords: Electrocatalytic system    Ammonia-nitrogen oxidation    Chlorine radical    Mass transfer    Mineralization    

The rapid development of industrialization and urbanization has caused abundant amounts of ammonia (NH4+/NH3) in wastewater [1,2]. The discharge of ammonia nitrogen into natural water bodies can result in severe water contamination and accelerate the process of eutrophication, which has serious harm to the ecological environment [3]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a green and efficient technology for the treatment of ammonia nitrogen in wastewater in light of the call for energy conservation and emission reduction [4-6].

Many efforts have been made to treat ammonia nitrogen by various technologies including air stripping [7,8], biological denitrification [9,10], and breakpoint chlorination [11,12]. Nevertheless, these methods have inherent limitations [13,14]. For instance, the air stripping exhibits poor removal efficiency for ammonia nitrogen with low concentration. Biological denitrification is easily disturbed by temperature and C/N ratio of wastewater and a long treatment period is required. Breakpoint chlorination is commonly observed in the chlorination of ammonia-containing wastewater treatments but its high cost and complex operation remain a problem. Recently, the electrocatalytic (EC) system based on the anodic chlorine evolution reaction (CER) has been identified as a highly sustainable approach for ammonia nitrogen removal due to its superior oxidation capacity / easy operation / regulation [15-17]. A wide variety of chlorine-containing active species can be produced in the EC system, which can efficiently and selectively oxidize ammonia into nitrogen (N2) [18,19]. Among these chlorine-containing active species, chlorine radical (Cl) has a higher redox potential (2.55 V vs. SHE) than HClO/ClO- (1.49/0.89 V vs. SHE), ClO (1.39 V vs. SHE), and Cl2•– (2.13 V vs. SHE) [20,21], thereby conferring a significant advantage in the removal of ammonia. Designed to produce Cl for water purification, a lot of advanced systems are developed, such as the photoelectrocatalytic system [22,23] and the EC system coupled with the advanced oxidation process [24]. However, due to the high reaction activity with Cl- (8.00 × 109 L mol-1 s-1), HClO/ClO- (3.00/8.30 × 109 L mol-1 s-1), and OH- (1.80 × 1010 L mol-1 s-1), Cl is easily quenched into low reactive species [13,25]. The difficulty of controllable generation of Cl in catalytic systems for ammonia removal is extremely high. Therefore, it is urgent to develop novel systems to efficiently and controllably produce Cl for the treatment of ammonia nitrogen wastewater.

$ \text{Volmer step}: \mathrm{Cl}^{-}{ }_{(\mathrm{aq})} \rightarrow \mathrm{Cl}^*+\mathrm{e}^{-} $ (1)
$ \text{Heyrovsky step}: \mathrm{Cl}^*+\mathrm{Cl}^{-}{ }_{(\mathrm{aq})} \rightarrow \mathrm{Cl}_{2(\mathrm{~g})}+\mathrm{e}^{-} $ (2)
$ \text{Tafel step}: \mathrm{Cl}^*+\mathrm{Cl}^* \rightarrow \mathrm{Cl}_{2(\mathrm{~g})} $ (3)

It is found from the Volmer step in CER that Cl- can be oxidized into adsorbed Cl (Cl*) (Eq. 1) [26]. The adsorbed Cl will undergo self-quenching into chlorine gas (Cl2) (Eqs. 2 and 3) [27,28]. If the adsorbed Cl at the anode interface can react with ammonia nitrogen and suppress their self-quenching, the Cl-mediated ammonia nitrogen mineralization process can be effectively and selectively achieved. However, in the CER-mediated ammonia nitrogen oxidation system, the active sites of the anode usually have a strong binding energy with Cl- [16,29,30], which suppresses the adsorbed Cl overflowing from the interface for ammonia nitrogen oxidation. More seriously, the pH of ammonia nitrogen wastewater is generally neutral or weakly acidic, and ammonia mainly exists in the form of NH4+ (pKa(NH4+/NH3) = 9.25) [31]. There is a strong electrostatic repulsion between NH4+ and the anode, which prevents the enrichment of NH4+ on the anodic interface to react with Cl. These results make it difficult for Cl in the CER process to efficiently remove ammonia nitrogen, seriously affecting the treatment efficiency of ammonia nitrogen wastewater. Spinel oxides (AB2O4) with excellent electrochemical activity and adjustable electronic structure are the potential anode materials for the Cl-mediated ammonia nitrogen oxidation process [32-34]. In detail, the octahedral sites (BOh3+) with a high oxidation potential can effectively oxidize Cl- to Cl, while the tetrahedral sites (ATd2+) with a high energy level matching with NH4+ may effectively enrich NH4+. Modulating the elements of ATd2+ can not only enhance the binding energy with NH4+ but also promote Cl overflow from BOh3+. Therefore, the design and development of the novel AB2O4 anode to efficiently rich NH4+ and produce Cl is of great significance for the removal of ammonia nitrogen wastewater.

Hence, this study introduces other ions such as Ni2+, Cu2+, or Zn2+ into the ATd2+ of Co3O4 to induce the efficient enrichment of NH4+ and the production of Cl at the anode, which realizes the Cl-mediated ammonia nitrogen oxidation process (Fig. 1a). Due to the high redox potential (E0 = 1.81 V) and rapid Co2+/Co3+ cycle, Cl- can be efficiently oxidized into Cl at CoOh3+ [35,36]. Due to the high occupancy of 3d orbits, the introduction of Ni2+, Cu2+, or Zn2+ into the ATd2+ of Co3O4 can couple the interactions of electron-repelling and π-donating in ATd2+-O-CoOh3+ [37]. As a result, the electronic structure of CoOh3+ is regulated to weaken the binding energy with Cl, which can efficiently overflow from CoOh3+ sites for ammonia nitrogen oxidation. Besides, the binding energy and the matching degree of energy level between different ATd2+ and NH4+ are elaborately analyzed. Through batch experiments and electrochemical characterizations, the mass transfer of NH4+ and production of Cl in the systems with different anodes are compared and their effects on ammonia nitrogen oxidation are investigated. Combined with theoretical calculations, the enhanced removal mechanism of ammonia nitrogen is discerned. This study opens a new avenue for the efficient mineralization treatment of actual ammonia-nitrogen wastewater and guides the design and synthesis of superior anodes for environmental remediation.

Download:
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic mechanism of enhanced ammonia oxidation by CuxCo3-xO4 compared to conventional anode. (b) DFT-calculated LUMO and HOMO energy level differences between A2+ and NH4+ (A2+: Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+). (c) Adsorption energy between NH4+ and the ATd2+ site in AxCo3-xO4 electrodes. (d) Crystal structure of CuxCo3-xO4. (e) XPS spectra for Co 2p and (f) Raman spectroscopy of Co3O4 before and after modification with Cu. In-situ Raman spectroscopy of (g) NixCo3-xO4, (h) CuxCo3-xO4, and (i) ZnxCo3-xO4.

The energy level differences (ΔE) of HOMO/LUMO and the binding energy between NH4+ and NiTd2+/CuTd2+/ZnTd2+ are systematically investigated. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, ΔE between NH4+ and CuTd2+/ZnTd2+ is 1.66 and 1.19 eV, respectively, which is much lower than that of NiTd2+ (3.45 eV). A nearer energy level of HOMO/LUMO in two molecules is more conducive to forming more stable bonding orbitals [38-40]. Besides, the adsorption energy (Eads) between the ATd2+ sites of AxCo3-xO4 (ATd2+: NiTd2+, CuTd2+, or ZnTd2+) and NH4+ is further analyzed. As shown in Fig. 1c and Fig. S1 (Supporting information), the value of Eads between NH4+ and ZnxCo3-xO4 is calculated to be merely −4.75 eV. Though a more stable bonding orbital between ZnTd2+ and NH4+, ZnTd2+ is relatively inert and cannot effectively enrich NH4+ because the 3d orbital of Zn2+ is fully filled by electrons (3d10) (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). By contrast, CuTd2+ has higher binding energy (−6.83 eV) with NH4+ than ZnTd2+ and NiTd2+ (−5.4 eV), which exhibits remarkable potential for enrichment of NH4+. AxCo3-xO4 with spinel structure was successfully synthesized by the one-pot hydrothermal method and it is verified that the tetrahedral sites in Co3O4 are substituted by NiTd2+, CuTd2+, or ZnTd2+ (Figs. 1d-f, Figs. S3-S12, Table S1 in Supporting information). Moreover, the mass transfer direction of NH4+ in the EC system was discerned over AxCo3-xO4 anode. As shown in Fig. S13 (Supporting information), all anodes show no obvious adsorption performance for NH4+ under no current applied condition. In the absence of an electric field, NH4+ is uniformly distributed in the EC system and there is no concentration gradient between the anode and cathode regions. After the input of current (25 mA), the concentration of NH4+ in the Pt cathode region decreases significantly from 5 mmol/L to approximately 3.2 mmol/L within 20 min, while that of the CuxCo3-xO4 anode region exhibits slow decreasing trends (4.3 mmol/L, 20 min). A distinct concentration gradient of NH4+ is observed between the CuxCo3-xO4 anode and cathode regions, which is more significant than that in the EC system with NixCo3-xO4, ZnxCo3-xO4 or Co3O4 anode (Figs. S14-S16 in Supporting information). Due to the strong interaction between CuTd2+ and NH4+, the dynamic mass transfer of NH4+ from the cathode region to the anode region and from the solution to the anode interface occurs, resulting in the concentration of NH4+ in the anode region much higher than that in the cathode region. This phenomenon demonstrates that CuxCo3-xO4 can overcome the electrostatic repulsion between NH4+ and anode, which is conducive to effective reaction with active species at the anodic interface.

To further visualize the enrichment of NH4+ at the anode interface, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and in-situ Raman spectra were carried out. No obvious characteristic peak of NH4+ is observed in the N 1s XPS of the NixCo3-xO4, ZnxCo3-xO4 and Co3O4 anodes before and after the input of current (Figs. S17-S19 in Supporting information). As a comparison, when CuxCo3-xO4 is the anode, the characteristic peak of N—H bond in NH4+ emerges after the input of current, indicating NH4+ can efficiently enrich at the CuxCo3-xO4 anode (Fig. S20 in Supporting information). In-situ Raman spectra provide more evidence that the introduction of CuTd2+ enhances the mass transfer of NH4+ to the anode. As shown in Fig. 1h, the peaks around 1590 cm-1 in-situ Raman spectra of the CuxCo3-xO4 system are assigned to the antisymmetric bending vibration of the HNH of NH3 [41-43]. The intensity of these peaks first increases and then decreases during the reaction, indicating that NH4+ can overcome the electrostatic interactions to enrich and be further oxidized on CuTd2+. The intensity of the A1g peak first decreases and then increases during the reaction, which is attributed to the cycling of Co3+/Co2+ at the octahedral sites for the activation of Cl-. The negligible peaks around 1590 cm-1 in the in-situ Raman spectra of the NixCo3-xO4, ZnxCo3-xO4, and Co3O4 anodes illustrate the interactions between NH4+ and the NixCo3-xO4/ZnxCo3-xO4/Co3O4 anodes are weak, leading to the inability of transferring NH4+ to the anode under electrostatic repulsion (Figs. 1g and i and Fig. S21 in Supporting information). Based on the above results, it is confirmed that CuxCo3-xO4 can efficiently induce NH4+ to overcome the electrostatic repulsion and realize its enrichment at the anode due to the strong interaction and moderate energy level matching between CuTd2+ and NH4+, which facilitates rapid reaction with interfacial active species and thus efficient mineralization.

The removal performance of ammonia-nitrogen was investigated in the EC system with different anodes. As shown in Fig. 2a and Fig. S22 (Supporting information), 100% of NH4+-N is removed in the EC system with CuxCo3-xO4 anode within 80 min at a kobs of 4.4 × 102 min-1, which is more remarkable than Co3O4 (2.2 × 102 min-1) and commercial dimensionally stable anode (DSA) (0.7 × 102 min-1). It is worth noting that the introduction of FeTd2+, MnTd2+, NiTd2+, and ZnTd2+ into the Co3O4 anode does not significantly improve the NH4+-N removal performance. Since there is no special interaction between NH4+ and AxCo3-xO4 (A = Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn) anode, NH4+ cannot enrich at the anode limited by electrostatic repulsion, resulting in that NH4+-N cannot react in time with the anodic interface Cl. As a comparison, the CuxCo3-xO4 anode can efficiently enrich NH4+ and achieve efficient mineralization of ammonia nitrogen by interfacial Cl. Besides, as demonstrated in Figs. 2b and c, the concentration of TN decreases simultaneously with the reduction of ammonia concentration and no undesirable products (such as NO2-, NO3-) are generated after the reaction. Although a small amount of chloramines (NH2Cl, NHCl2, and NCl3) are produced during the reaction process, they are completely converted into N2 as the reaction progresses. Moreover, five cycle experiments were performed to evaluate the durability of CuxCo3-xO4 electrodes. As shown in Fig. S23 (Supporting information), the degradation of NH4+-N remains essentially unchanged after five consecutive runs. The morphology, structure and Co2+/Co3+ ratio of the CuxCo3-xO4 anode after five cycles are basically consistent with that before the reaction, and the leaching concentrations of cobalt ions are < 0.6 mg/L and those of copper ions are < 0.3 mg/L after each cycle (Figs. S24-S28 in Supporting information). These results confirm that the CuxCo3-xO4 anode has excellent stability. In addition, to further explore the feasibility of the practical application of the CuxCo3-xO4 anode, the cost analysis for ammonia nitrogen degradation is performed. As exhibited in Fig. 2d, Tables S2 and S3 (Supporting information), no matter the electrode cost or energy consumption, the CuxCo3-xO4 anode (0.44 $/piece, 15.1 kWh/kg-N) is superior to DSA (1.47 $/piece, 31.3 kWh/kg-N) and other ammonia oxidation reaction (AOR) anodes reported by the previous literature.

Download:
Fig. 2. (a) Ammonia nitrogen removal performance in the EC system using different anodes. Concentrations of (b) different nitrogen species and (c) chloramine in the EC system with CuxCo3-xO4 anode. (d) Cost analysis of different systems for ammonia removal. Ammonia and total nitrogen removal performance of (e) CuxCo3-xO4 and (f) DSA anodes for treatment of practical wastewater. (g) Diagram showing the electrochemical reaction tank with multipairs of electrodes for landfill leachate treatment under continuous flow conditions. Time-dependent degradation rate of (h) NH4+-N and (i) total nitrogen for continuous treatment of landfill leachate by the CuxCo3-xO4 system with 3 pairs of electrodes.

To confirm the feasibility of CuxCo3-xO4 anode for the treatment of practical ammonia-nitrogen wastewater (pH 7.51), further experiments are constructed to evaluate its high activity. The main components of landfill leachate are presented in Table S4 (Supporting information) and the NH4+-N concentration in the raw wastewater is 332.6 mg/L. As shown in Fig. 2e, the EC system assembled with CuxCo3-xO4 anode exhibits a significantly higher NH4+-N removal and mineralization performance (99.1%, 70.7%) within 8 h than that with Co3O4 anode (85.9%, 60.1%) and DSA (55.8%, 40.0%) (Fig. 2f and Fig. S29 in Supporting information). More importantly, the scale-up experiment in a flow electrolyzer with CuxCo3-xO4 anode realizes 100% of NH4+-N and 88.3% of total nitrogen (TN) removal during the four days continuous operation without an obvious decline in catalytic performance (Figs. 2g-i), which is also much superior to the system with DSA (NH4+-N: 77.2%, TN: 66.1%) (Figs. S30 and S31 in Supporting information). Besides, the peak shapes and positions of the XRD diffraction peaks and Raman peaks of the CuxCo3-xO4 electrodes remained almost unchanged after the long-term reaction, indicating that the CuxCo3-xO4 electrodes have good stability (Figs. S32 and S33 in Supporting information). In conclusion, CuxCo3-xO4 demonstrates extraordinary activity for NH4+-N mineralization and excellent feasibility for the purification of practical ammonia-nitrogen wastewater.

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) technology and quenching experiments were performed to verify the active species during the NH4+ mineralization process. An EPR signal with eleven-lines is observed in the EC system with Co3O4 and CuxCo3-xO4 anodes during the electrolysis of NaCl solution (Fig. 3a), corresponding to DMPO—OH and DMPO—Cl [44]. Compared with the Co3O4 anode, the higher signal intensity of DMPO—Cl on the CuxCo3-xO4 anode indicates the introduction of CuTd2+ facilitates the production of Cl. After the addition of NH4+-N to the EC system with CuxCo3-xO4 anode, the DMPO—Cl signal disappears and the DMPO—OH signal is retained, confirming that NH4+-N is susceptible to oxidation by Cl relative to OH (Fig. 3b). The role of Cl was further investigated using different quenchers. Hyposulphite (Na2S2O3) is the quencher for OH, Cl and free chlorines; tertiary butanol (TBA) for OH, Cl and ClO; bicarbonate (HCO3-) for OH, Cl and Cl2•-; p-chlorobenzoic acid (PCBA) for OH (Table S5 in Supporting information) [45]. As shown in Figs. S34 and S35 (Supporting information), NH4+-N is barely degraded using Na2S2O3 as a quencher, confirming that direct oxidation of NH4+-N on the CuxCo3-xO4 anode is difficult. PCBA shows a slight inhibitory effect on ammonia degradation, suggesting a limited role for OH. The degradation of NH4+-N is significantly inhibited by the addition of HCO3- (49.2%, 80 min), suggesting that both Cl and Cl2•- are involved. According to previous studies, NH4+-N has much higher reaction rates with Cl than Cl2•- (Table S6 in Supporting information), indicating Cl mediated radical oxidation plays a major role in NH4+-N oxidation. The contribution of different active species to ammonia oxidation is evaluated and quantified based on the specific subtraction of ammonia oxidation rate constants for different quenchers (Fig. 3c). The detailed calculation of the contribution of each active species is shown in Fig. S36 (Supporting information). The Cl is mainly responsible (about 74.6%) for the overall ammonia oxidation. In addition, the concentration variation and current efficiency (η) of free chlorines (Cl2, ClO-, and HClO) in the different systems is quantified (Fig. S37 in Supporting information). Compared to DSA and Co3O4, The CuxCo3-xO4 system exhibits enhanced free chlorine production and higher current efficiency, further demonstrating that the introduction of CuTd2+ facilitates Cl generation.

Download:
Fig. 3. (a) EPR spectra in CuxCo3-xO4/NaCl (brown line) and Co3O4/NaCl (blue line) systems. Conditions: [NaCl] = 60 mmol/L, constant current = 25 mA. (b) EPR spectra. Conditions: [NaCl] = 60 mmol/L, constant current = 25 mA. (c) Contributions of different active species in the CuxCo3-xO4 system. (d) LSV curves of CuxCo3-xO4 and Co3O4. Condition: [NaCl] = 60 mmol/L, scan rate: 5 mV/s. (e) Tafel slopes of CuxCo3-xO4 and Co3O4 anodes. Conditions: [NaCl] = 60 mmol/L. (f) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of Co3O4 and CuxCo3-xO4 anodes. Conditions: [NaCl] = 60 mmol/L, scan rate: 5 mV/s. Bode phase diagrams of the operando EIS measurements on (g) Co3O4 and (h) CuxCo3-xO4 in the presence of NH4+.

The Cl generation and ammonia oxidation activities of the CuxCo3-xO4 anode are investigated by varied electrochemical characterizations. As shown in Fig. 3d, a higher current density is observed in the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curve with CuxCo3-xO4 anode than that with Co3O4 anode, and the current density is significantly increased after adding NH4+. Although the introduction of CuTd2+ of Co3O4 does not significantly increase CER performance, the AOR activity is greatly promoted because NH4+-N can efficiently react with the interfacial Cl. Besides, the Tafel slopes of the CuxCo3-xO4 anode are markedly lower than that of the Co3O4 anode in the absence and presence of NH4+ (Fig. 3e), indicating that the CuxCo3-xO4 anode exhibits superior kinetics for Cl generation and AOR. Moreover, a redox peak is observed in the cyclic voltammogram (CV) curve around 1.5 V for both Co3O4 and CuxCo3-xO4 anodes (Fig. 3f), attributing to Co2+/Co3+. Specifically, only one anodic peak appeared at 1.65 V for the CuxCo3-xO4 anode, indicating that CuTd2+ can promote the cycle of Co2+/Co3+ to achieve efficient Cl generation. In addition, the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) of the electrodes is explored by the electrochemical double-layer capacitance (Cdl) to compare their intrinsic activities. Figs. S38 and S39 (Supporting information) illustrate that the Cdl value and intrinsic activity of the CuxCo3-xO4 anode are significantly higher than that of the Co3O4 anode, providing further evidence that the introduction of Cu2+ into the CuxCo3-xO4 increases the active sites for Cl production.

Electrocatalytic reaction kinetics and electrode/electrolyte interface properties are further investigated through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). As shown in Figs. S40 and S41 (Supporting information), a transition peak at the 1.65 V potential is observed for both Co3O4 and CuxCo3-xO4 anodes. The transition peak is related to the unevenness charge contribution caused by the formation of oxidizing species on the electrode surface [46]. The transition peaks shift to higher frequencies and lower phase angles as the potential rises in CER processes. The frequency and phase angle of the CuxCo3-xO4 anode varies to a greater extent relative to Co3O4 with the increase of bias voltage, which indicates that the introduction of CuTd2+ enhances the Cl generation activity. Notably, an earlier and lower-frequency transition peak at the potential of 1.55 V is observed for the CuxCo3-xO4 anode after the addition of NH4+ (Figs. 3g and h). These results indicate that the introduction of Cu2+ into the tetrahedral site of Co3O4 can effectively enrich NH4+ and enhance the NH4+-N oxidation performance.

By comparing the electronic structure of CoOh3+ sites and the adsorption capacity of reaction intermediates before and after Cu doping, the enhanced removal mechanism of ammonia nitrogen over the CuxCo3-xO4 anode is elaborately studied. As shown in Figs. 4a and b, the shift of the Co 2p XPS to the higher binding energies emerges after the introduction of CuTd2+ into Co3O4, indicating an increase in electron cloud density around Co(Ⅱ)/Co(Ⅲ) in CuxCo3-xO4 compared to Co3O4. Besides, the differential charge density and Bader charge of the different anodes are further conducted. As illustrated in Fig. 4c, the district around CuTd2+ is predominantly electronic dissipating (green), while the district around CoOh3+ is predominantly electronic accumulating (purple), indicating that electrons around CuTd2+ migrate towards CoOh3+. The Bader charge analysis shows that the introduction of CuTd2+ modulates the charge of the adjacent CoOh3+ from 1.22 to 1.24. As a result, the adsorption energy of Cl- at the CoOh3+ sites is weakened from −0.15 eV to −0.10 eV (Fig. 4d), which could facilitate Cl overflowing from CoOh3+ for NH4+-N oxidation. Finally, the Gibbs free energy of the Cl generation process is calculated by DFT to further understand the effect of Cu doping. During the Cl generation process, the rate-determining step (RDS) is the desorption of Cl* from CoOh3+, and its energy barrier is reduced from 2.57 eV to 2.52 eV by Cu doping (Fig. 4e). The results indicate that Cu doping facilitates the desorption of Cl* from CoOh3+ sites, thereby promoting the Cl for NH4+-N oxidation.

Download:
Fig. 4. XPS spectra of (a) Co 2p and (b) Cu 2p orbitals of Co3O4 with different Cu introductions. (c) Differential charge density diagram of CuxCo3-xO4. (d) Adsorption energy between Cl- and the structural Co(Ⅲ) in Co3O4 and CuxCo3-xO4 electrodes. (e) Gibbs energy diagrams for the Cl generation reaction on Co3O4Co(Ⅲ) and CuxCo3-xO4Co(Ⅲ).

In conclusion, the enhanced removal mechanism of NH4+-N over the CuxCo3-xO4 anode is explained as follows. The introduction of CuTd2+ into Co3O4 induces the enrichment of NH4+ at the anode by utilizing the strong interaction between NH4+ and Cu2+. Subsequently, the tetrahedral substitution of Cu2+ in Co3O4 can modulate the electronic structure of the CoOh3+ and promote the overflow of Cl from CoOh3+, thus achieving the efficient and selective mineralization of NH4+-N by interfacial Cl.

In this study, we introduce CuTd2+ into the tetrahedral sites of Co3O4 to enhance the mass transfer of NH4+ and weaken the binding energy of Cl at the CoOh3+ sites for the selective and efficient NH4+-N mineralization induced by interfacial Cl. Compared to NiTd2+ and ZnTd2+, CuTd2+ has moderate energy level matching and strong binding energy with NH4+, which results in NH4+ effectively overcoming electrostatic repulsion and enriching at the anode. Meanwhile, the electronic interactions of CuTd2+-O-CoOh3+ bonds increase the electron cloud density, weakening the binding energy of Cl at the CoOh3+ sites, which is conducive to the separation of Cl from the interface, and then reacting with NH4+-N. As a result, NH4+-N is efficiently mineralized into N2 with low cost and energy consumption in the EC system assembled with CuxCo3-xO4 anode, superior to which is much that of the commercial DSA. Notably, the system exhibits excellent activity and durability in treating high concentrations of NH4+-N from practical landfill leachate under continuous flow operation, confirming its excellent application potential. This paper provides a new idea for the efficient mineralization treatment of actual ammonia-nitrogen wastewater.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xia Chen: Writing – original draft, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Ting Dai: Investigation. Meng-Ying Yin: Formal analysis. Xing-Yuan Xia: Software. Qiu-Ju Xing: Visualization, Supervision. Lei Tian: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization. Jian-Ping Zou: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52300081, 52170082, 52470079, 51938007, and 52100186), the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foudation (CPSF) (No. GZB20240175), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2024M750620), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20212ACB203008), and Key Laboratory of Jiangxi Province for Persistent Pollutants Prevention Control and Resource Reuse (No. 2023SSY02061). We are grateful for the financial support of the projects and research platform support provided by the laboratory.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111445.

References
[1]
O. Deng, S. Wang, J. Ran, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 401. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-44685-y
[2]
M.R. Adam, M.H.D. Othman, R.A. Samah, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 213 (2019) 114-132. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.030
[3]
A. Lintern, L. McPhillips, B. Winfrey, J. Duncan, C. Grady, Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (2020) 9159-9174. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.9b07511
[4]
R. Ma, K. Li, Y. Guo, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 6308. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-25854-3
[5]
O. Deng, S. Huang, C. Wang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 58 (2024) 449-458. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.3c07546
[6]
H.Y. Liu, J.A. Jayworth, R.H. Crabtree, G.W. Brudvig, ACS Catal. 14 (2024) 2842-2846. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.3c05899
[7]
G. Mutahi, J.B. van Lier, H. Spanjers, Water Res. 265 (2024) 122296. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2024.122296
[8]
C. Shin, A. Szczuka, M.J. Liu, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2022) 8712-8721. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.1c07992
[9]
Z. Hu, T. Liu, Z. Wang, J. Meng, M. Zheng, Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 4522-4532. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.2c06444
[10]
J.J. Wang, B.C. Huang, J. Li, R.C. Jin, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 2567-2574. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.07.036
[11]
Y.H. Chuang, T.Y. Chen, C.S. Chou, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 15232-15242. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.3c03326
[12]
Y. Liu, Y. Zhu, W. Duan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 110347. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110347
[13]
C. Zhang, D. He, J. Ma, T.D. Waite, Water Res. 145 (2018) 220-230. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.025
[14]
X. Huang, Y. Zhang, J. Bai, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 392 (2020) 123695. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.123695
[15]
Y. Chen, G. Zhang, Q. Ji, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2022) 9722-9731. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.2c01707
[16]
L. Tian, X.Y. Xia, L.J. Zhou, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 340 (2024) 123260. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123260
[17]
Y. Chen, X. Xia, L. Tian, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109789. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109789
[18]
P. Jiang, T. Zhou, J. Bai, et al., Water Res. 235 (2023) 119914. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2023.119914
[19]
Y. Zhou, H. Wang, X. Liu, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 294 (2021) 120265. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120265
[20]
D. Minakata, D. Kamath, S. Maetzold, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017) 6918-6926. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b00507
[21]
Y. Lei, X. Lei, P. Westerhoff, X. Zhang, X. Yang, Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (2021) 689-699. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c05596
[22]
Y. Zhang, J. Li, J. Bai, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (2018) 1413-1420. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b04626
[23]
C. Zhou, J. Li, J. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 324 (2023) 122229. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122229
[24]
J. Sun, L. Liu, F. Yang, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 308 (2022) 121215. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121215
[25]
N. Chen, J. Ruan, S. Lu, Z. Sun, G. Zhang, ACS ES&T Water 2 (2022) 1132-1142.
[26]
H. Ha, K. Jin, S. Park, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 (2019) 1226-1233. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00547
[27]
S. Zhao, H. Li, J. Dai, et al., Nat. Sustain. 7 (2024) 148-157. DOI:10.1038/s41893-023-01265-8
[28]
X. Zhang, D. Wu, X. Liu, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 330 (2023) 122594. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122594
[29]
S. Xing, N. Liu, Q. Li, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 4951. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-49319-5
[30]
J. Wang, L. Zhao, Y. Zou, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 11152-11163.
[31]
F. Zhang, Z. Du, J. Wang, Y. Du, Y. Peng, Water Res. 260 (2024) 121921. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2024.121921
[32]
Z. Wang, J. Huang, L. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202114696. DOI:10.1002/anie.202114696
[33]
H. Luo, J. Deng, Q. Gou, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107885. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107885
[34]
Q. Hu, S. Qi, Q. Huo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 2967-2976. DOI:10.1021/jacs.3c06904
[35]
Y. Zhang, X. Huang, J. Li, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2022) 9693-9701. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.2c00729
[36]
W. Hu, M. Zheng, H. Duan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1412-1416. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.025
[37]
L. Tian, Z.J. Tang, L.Y. Hao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202401434. DOI:10.1002/anie.202401434
[38]
J. Luo, L. Xu, Y. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202302302. DOI:10.1002/anie.202302302
[39]
Z.Q. Xu, R. Zou, W.W. Liu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 471 (2023) 144581. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2023.144581
[40]
Z.Z. Dong, J.H. Zhang, L. Zhu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 109773. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109773
[41]
W. Gao, K. Xie, J. Xie, et al., Adv. Mater. 35 (2023) 2202952. DOI:10.1002/adma.202202952
[42]
L. Bai, F. Franco, J. Timoshenko, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 9665-9678. DOI:10.1021/jacs.3c13288
[43]
J.Y. Fang, Q.Z. Zheng, Y.Y. Lou, et al., Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 7899. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-35533-6
[44]
Y. Zhang, J. Li, J. Bai, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy 238 (2018) 168-176. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.036
[45]
W. Kuang, Z. Yan, J. Chen, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 18538-18549. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.2c05735
[46]
L. Cai, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, et al., J. Energy Chem. 92 (2024) 95-103. DOI:10.1016/j.jechem.2023.12.002