Advanced energy storage technology is essential for exploiting future sustainable and renewable energy supply. Lithium–ion batteries (LIBs) are commonly utilized as a power source for a series of applications, containing portable electronics and transportation, owing to their high energy density and extended lifespan [1–4]. However, the scarcity and costly nature of lithium resources have become a challenge due to the continuously growing need for energy storage solutions in the market, making it increasingly difficult for lithium for the future energy demands. Sodium, as an element with the same group as lithium, exhibits comparable chemical characteristics to lithium. Besides, sodium–ion batteries (SIBs) display similar electrochemical behavior to that of LIBs, which endowed SIBs as promising alternative to LIBs. However, the electrochemical reaction kinetics and storage capacity of SIBs are inevitably suppressed owing to the larger ionic radii of Na+ (1.02 Å) in comparison with Li+ (0.76 Å), as well as the high relative atomic masses of Na (23, 6.9 for Li) [5–7]. Therefore, developing anode materials that have high reversible capacity and stable cycling performance for Na+ storage is a critical challenge for SIBs [8–10].
Transition metal sulfides (TMSs) have become one of the best electrode materials for SIBs due to their excellent theoretical capacity and abundant active sites [11,12]. Moreover, compared to single-metal sulfides, mixed metal sulfides (MMSs) have received growing interest in the energy storage domain thanks to their ability to generate synergistic effects, possess lower band gaps and higher conductivity [13]. NixCo3-xS4 compound is a promising electrode material for SIBs, as it exhibits richer redox reactions and higher specific capacitance compared to its respective single-metal sulfides (NiSx/CoSx) [14,15]. However, the cycle life and rate performance of NixCo3-xS4 are hindered by volumetric expansion that occurs during the redox process. According to literature reports, structural engineering that enhances material stability is an effective means of improving volume expansion [16]. For example, Li et al. synthesized nickel boride (Ni—B) nanosheets within hollow Ni—Co sulfide nanospheres and found that the Ni—B component could reinforce the structural stability of the electrode material. The reversible capacity after 200 cycles at 1.0 A/g was 251.9 mAh/g, which represented a significant improvement over bare NiCo2S4 [17]. Liu et al. synthesized NiCo2S4@MoS2 core-shell nanostructures via a hydrothermal method, which enhance the contact between the electrolyte and the core/shell nanostructure and promote the rate of Na+ diffusion. At 6.4 A/g, a capacity of 155 mAh/g was delivered, and the Coulombic efficiency remained above 99% after 400 cycles [18]. In addition, introducing a highly conductive and buffering matrix is considered a highly effective approach, such as the introduction of carbon materials, which can effectively suppress the volume expansion and prevent their self-aggregation, thereby improving the cycling life of the electrode material [19–22]. Sun et al. synthesized NiCo2S4@rGO nanocomposites with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as a protective matrix. The rGO coating effectively immobilized the transformation products of NiS2 and CoS2 generated during the phase transition of NiCo2S4, thereby enhancing the structural stability and mitigating volumetric expansion. As a result, the NiCo2S4@rGO composite maintained a capacity retention rate of over 95% after 100 cycles, while exhibiting a high reversible capacity of 621 mAh/g at 0.1 A/g [23]. Fan et al. immobilized NiCo2S4 nanosheets onto the surface of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which reduced the impact of volume expansion on NiCo2S4 and increased the conductivity of the composite electrode material. The NiCo2S4@CNTs electrode showed a capacity of 169.29 mAh/g (10 A/g) in SIBs [24]. Despite their excellent electrochemical performance, both reduced graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes face high costs that hinder their further development and application. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate novel and cost-effective carbon material composite electrodes. Carbon dots (CDs), as a new type of zero-dimensional (0D) carbon material with ultra-small particle size (less than 10 nm), can greatly alleviate the aggregation of composite materials, improve their conductivity, and provide stable support for the structure of the composite material [25–28]. Compared to traditional carbon materials, the introduction of CDs shows great potential for further exploration.
Recently, coordination polymers (CPs), also called metal–organic framework materials (MOFs), constructing by the combination of metal ions and organic ligands, have been acknowledged as a highly effective category of electrochemical energy storage materials owing to their exceptional strengths in tunable pore structures and high specific surface areas [29–31]. In this study, nickel-cobalt bimetal coordination polymer (NiCoCP) was firstly synthesized by a co-precipitation method and used as a sacrificial template. Then, NiCo2S4@CDs cross-stacked architecture was obtained through high-temperature sulfidation of NiCoCP and the subsequent carbon coating process from the carbonization of glucose. These carbon dots (CDs) loaded in NiCo2S4 can effectively increase the conductivity of the electrode material. When employed as anodes in SIBs, NiCo2S4@CDs delivered a rate capacity of 568.9 mAh/g at 0.5 A/g and could maintain a discharge specific capacity of 302.7 mAh/g after 750 cycles at 5.0 A/g.
The process for synthesizing the NiCo2S4@CDs with hierarchical layered structure decorated with carbon dots is illustrated in Fig. S1 (Supporting information). Initially, NiCoCP precursors were prepared using the coprecipitation method. Nanosheets of nickel-cobalt bimetallic polymer assembled through static adsorption between Ni(CN)42- and Co2+ ions. Sodium citrate was used to induce self-assembly, resulting in the formation of cross-stacked cubic nanoflowers. Afterwards, the NiCoCP precursor underwent additional high temperature sulfidation treatment to yield nickel-cobalt bimetallic sulfide NiCo2S4. This transition metal sulfide was derived from metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and was characterized by abundant internal pores, providing the possibility of loading glucose. NiCo2S4 loaded with glucose was then heated at 200 ℃ for 3 h, causing the carbonization of glucose into carbon dots. This ultimately resulted in the formation of NiCo2S4@CDs with a hierarchical layered structure decorated with carbon dots.
The morphology and structure of the samples were characterized using SEM, TEM, and EDS techniques. The SEM images of the precursor NiCoCP are displayed in Fig. 1a, from which the morphology of this material can be visually observed to consist of uniformly sized and evenly dispersed 3D cubic nanoflowers, each of which is composed of multiple smooth nanosheets that cross-stack with each other. Fig. 1b illustrates SEM images of NiCo2S4 after undergoing high-temperature sulfidation treatment, revealing the retention of the basic morphology of the NiCoCP precursor while exhibiting a rougher surface. Upon magnification, numerous small nanoparticles are observed on the surface. Figs. 1c and d presents SEM images of the final sample, NiCo2S4@CDs. While the surface morphology is similar to that of NiCo2S4, significant internal changes have taken place, which will be further elucidated in subsequent investigations. The TEM images of NiCo2S4@CDs are presented in Figs. 1e and j, which confirms that the nanoflowers in NiCo2S4@CDs are composed of multiple nanosheets cross-stacked with each other. The HRTEM image of NiCo2S4@CDs displayed in Fig. 1g shows two sets of lattice fringes corresponding to the 311 plane (d = 0.28 nm) and 220 plane (d = 0.33 nm) of the NiCo2S4 phase. The HRTEM images of the CDs in NiCo2S4@CDs depicted in Figs. 1h–j show that the CDs have a size range below 10 nm, and the insert in Fig. 1j reveals a lattice spacing of 0.21 nm that matches well with the (100) plane of graphite carbon, thereby confirming the formation of CDs. Figs. 1k-o display the EDS analysis results, which confirms the presence of Ni, Co, S, N, and C elements in the synthesized NiCo2S4@CDs, thereby validating its successful synthesis.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 1. SEM of (a) NiCoCP, (b) NiCo2S4, (c, d) NiCo2S4@CDs. (e, f) TEM images of NiCo2S4@CDs. (g) HRTEM image of NiCo2S4@CDs, inset in (g) shows the inverse FFT patterns. (h–j) HRTEM image of CDs in NiCo2S4@CDs, inset in (j) shows the inverse FFT patterns. (k–o) Mapping images of NiCo2S4@CDs. | |
The XRD spectra were used to study the information of the purity and crystal structure of the prepared samples. Fig. 2a displays the XRD diffraction pattern of the target product, showing characteristic peaks at 16.3°, 26.8°, 31.5°, 38.3°, 46.4°, 50.4°, 55.2°, 65.1°, 69.2°, and 78.0° that correspond to the (111), (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), (440), (533), (444), and (731) lattice planes of cubic phase NiCo2S4@CDs according to JCPDS card No. 20-0782. The diffraction peaks of the sample are clear and sharp, with no excess peaks observed, indicating its high crystallinity. XPS analysis was performed to examine the surface elemental composition and electron structure of the NiCo2S4@CDs nanocomposite material. Fig. S2 (Supporting information) presents the complete measurement spectrum of the composite material in the 0–1400 eV range, revealing six types of characteristic peaks that indicate the presence of Ni, Co, S, C, N, and O elements. The presence of the O element can be explained by the surface oxidation of the material. The peaks observed at 860.7 and 879.1 eV in Fig. 2b correspond to satellite peaks of Ni 2p, while the peaks at 851.6/868.7 eV and 854.5/872.4 eV can be ascribed to Ni2+ and Ni3+, respectively [32–34]. The Co 2p signal spectrum in Fig. 2c was fitted as Co 2p3/2 (776.8/780.0 eV) and Co 2p1/2 (791.9 eV/795.8 eV) two spin–orbit double peaks, indicating that cobalt exists in two states of Co3+ and Co2+ in the sample, accompanied by two satellite peaks located at 784.8 and 801.6 eV, possibly due to oscillation of high spin Co2+ [35–37]. Fig. 2d shows the N 1s fine spectrum. The three characteristic peaks detected at 397.0, 397.7, and 399.2 eV can be assigned to pyridinic nitrogen, pyrrolic nitrogen, and graphitic nitrogen, respectively [38,39]. N doping can introduce more defects, improving electronic conductivity and providing more active sites for Na+ storage. As shown in Fig. 2e, the S 2p fine spectrum exhibits two prominent peaks located at 160.8 eV and 162.0 eV, which correspond to S2- of S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2, respectively. The peak located at 163.3 eV is attributed to the bonding between S and metals [40,41]. The high-resolution C 1s spectrum shown in Fig. 2f reveals a spectral peak at 284.8 eV corresponding to C—C bonding, another at 286.2 eV attributed to C—N/C—S bonding, and a peak at 288.2 eV corresponding to C═N/C═O bonding [19,42]. All the results indicate the successful preparation of NiCo2S4@CDs composite material.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 2. (a) XRD pattern of NiCo2S4@CDs. High-resolution XPS spectrum of (b) Ni 2p, (c) Co 2p, (d) N 1s, (e) S 1s, (f) C 1s. | |
Fig. 3 displays the electrochemical properties of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode and the NiCo2S4 contrast sample. To assess their rate performance, the materials were subjected to cycling at different current densities, as illustrated in Fig. 3a. The NiCo2S4@CDs anode exhibits capacities of 665, 633, 569, 526, 484 and 419 mAh/g at 0.1–5 A/g, respectively. Upon decreasing to 0.2 A/g, the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode recovers a capacity of 546 mAh/g. In contrast, the NiCo2S4 electrode demonstrates lower capacity than NiCo2S4@CDs at the same current density, indicating that NiCo2S4@CDs exhibits superior rate performance. Fig. 3b shows the discharge/charge curves of NiCo2S4@CDs and NiCo2S4 electrodes during the first cycle at 0.1 A/g in SIBs. It is evident that the initial discharge capacity of NiCo2S4@CDs (854.31 mAh/g) is higher than that of NiCo2S4 (595.7 mAh/g) during the first cycle. However, the initial Coulombic efficiency of NiCo2S4@CDs (81.6%) is slightly lower than that of NiCo2S4 (85.9%) during the first cycle. Fig. 3c illustrates the initial five cycles of charge–discharge curves of NiCo2S4@CDs at 0.1 A/g. In the first cycle of charging and discharging, the Coulombic efficiency reaches 81%, and in the subsequent cycling process, the charge–discharge curves overlapped well, indicating that NiCo2S4@CDs demonstrates high reversibility during charging and discharging processes. Fig. 3d depicts the charge–discharge curves of NiCo2S4@CDs at various current densities, and the curves exhibit two pairs of reaction platforms, corresponding to the outcomes of subsequent cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests. In addition, we compare the rate performance of NiCo2S4@CDs electrode material with different NiCo2S4 base electrode materials reported in the literature [13,17,18,23,24,43], as depicted in Fig. 3e. The figure provides a clear depiction of the superior rate performance of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode material compared to other NiCo2S4-based electrode materials, thereby endowing it with highly promising prospects for application in SIBs. Fig. 3f presents the cycle performance of NiCo2S4@CDs and NiCo2S4 at 0.5 A/g. Due to inevitable decomposition of electrolyte solution and formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) membrane, the capacity decayed faster in the first few cycles. However, by the 10th cycle, the discharge capacity of NiCo2S4@CDs stabilizes at 631 mAh/g, while that of NiCo2S4 only reaches 492 mAh/g. Additionally, the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode demonstrates outstanding long-term cycle stability, as demonstrated in Fig. 3g, where it retains a capacity of 302.7 mAh/g after 750 cycles at 5 A/g.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 3. (a) Rate capability of NiCo2S4@CDs in SIBs. (b) The discharge/charge curves of NiCo2S4@CDs and NiCo2S4 during the first cycle at 0.1 A/g in SIBs. (c) The discharge/charge profiles of NiCo2S4@CDs at 0.1 A/g in SIBs. (d) The discharge/charge profiles of NiCo2S4@CDs at various current densities in SIBs. (e) The comparison of rate performance between NiCo2S4@CDs electrode and different NiCo2S4-based electrode materials reported in literature. (f) Cycle performance of NiCo2S4@CDs and NiCo2S4 at 0.5 A/g in SIBs. (g) Cycle performance of NiCo2S4@CDs at 5 A/g in SIBs. | |
To deeply study the electrochemical mechanism of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode in SIBs, cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed at different scan rates, spanning from 0.1 mV/s to 1.0 mV/s. As shown in Fig. S3a (Supporting information), the CV curves at different scan rates are essentially identical except for the position shift of the oxidation–reduction peak, indicating the existence of pseudocapacitance behavior of NiCo2S4@CDs electrode during cycling. To confirm this behavior, a linear fitting of log(scan rate) and log(peak current) values was conducted. The slope obtained from the fitting reflects the state of the electrochemical reaction process. Typically, a slope value of 0.5 indicates that the charge–discharge process is governed by ion diffusion, while a value of 1.0 suggests that the charge–discharge process is controlled by surface capacitance. As shown in Fig. S3b (Supporting information), the slopes b of the log(ip)-log(v) curves at different peak currents are 0.78 (peak 1), 0.74 (peak 2) and 0.82 (peak 3), indicating that the charge-discharge process of NiCo2S4@CDs electrode exhibits both pseudocapacitance and ion diffusion reactions. The capacitive contribution ratio of NiCo2S4@CDs electrode was tested at a scan rate of 1.0 mV/s, indicate a pseudocapacitance contribution ratio of 91.7% (Fig. S3c in Supporting information), which is consistent with expectations. Furthermore, Fig. S3d (Supporting information) displays the calculated pseudocapacitance contribution ratios at different scan rates. Upon increasing the scan rate from 0.1 mV/s to 1.0 mV/s, the proportion of pseudocapacitance contribution gradually rises from 77% to 92%. This observation suggests that the sodium storage process of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode is primarily governed by pseudocapacitance, and this dynamic mechanism promotes the rapid sodiation/desodiation of Na+ in the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode.
The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) is a method based on the potentiostatic measurement to determine the chemical diffusion coefficient of electrons/ions in mixed conductors, revealing the relationship between ion diffusion rate and depth of discharge. Therefore, this technique can help us understand the complex electrode kinetics mechanism. Fig. S3e (Supporting information) shows a complete GITT curve of NiCo2S4@CDs during a single charge–discharge cycle, demonstrating the relationship between voltage and time. Based on the formula: 
To further elucidate the factors contributing to their excellent electrochemical performance, we conducted electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests on the NiCo2S4@CDs and NiCo2S4 electrodes. Fig. S4a (Supporting information) shows the Nyquist plots of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode in the initial state, as well as after the 100th and 200th cycles. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) was estimated by the diameter of the semicircle on the real axis, where a smaller Rct corresponds to less resistance to charge transfer at the electrode-electrolyte interface. Compared to the initial state, Rct gradually decreases with an increasing cycle number, indicating that Rct decreases rapidly with the continuous activation of the electrode material. The low-frequency oblique line in the Nyquist plot corresponds to the Warburg impedance (Zw) of the electrode, which represents the diffusion of Na+ in the electrode and electrolyte. The greater the slope of the oblique line, the faster the ion diffusion. Notably, from the initial state to 100 cycles and then to 200 cycles, the slope of the oblique line in the low frequency region increases, indicating that the ion diffusion dynamics are constantly being enhanced. With continuous activation during cycling, the ion diffusion and charge transfer in the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode demonstrate a dynamic enhancement. Furthermore, the Nyquist plots of the NiCo2S4 electrode and NiCo2S4@CDs are compared in Fig. S4b (Supporting information). It is evident that the Rct of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode is smaller, and the slope of the low-frequency linear region is larger. These observations suggest that the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode exhibits superior electronic transport and ion diffusion capabilities compared to the NiCo2S4 electrode.
When compared to the NiCo2S4 electrode, the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode with carbon dots exhibits superior electrochemical performance. It is necessary to analyze the reaction mechanism of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode material during charge and discharge processes. Firstly, the electrochemical reaction process of the NiCo2S4 and NiCo2S4@CDs composite electrode was investigated using cyclic voltammetry. The CV curves of NiCo2S4 (Fig. S5 in Supporting information) and NiCo2S4@CDs (Fig. 4a) exhibit similar peak shapes and peak potentials, indicating that they have the same redox process. The reduction peak at 1.18 V can be attributed to the intercalation of Na+ into NiCo2S4@CDs, forming NaxNiCo2S4@CDs. The corresponding reaction is given by xNa+ + NiCo2S4@CDs + xe− → NaxNiCo2S4@CD.The reduction peaks at 0.78 V to 0.6 V are due to the conversion reaction, which generates Ni, Co, and Na2S. The corresponding reaction is NaxNiCo2S4 + (8 − x)Na+ + (8 − x)e− → Ni + 2Co + 4Na2S [23,24,44]. Two oxidation peaks are observed at 1.76 V and 1.96 V during the anodic scan, indicating the reverse reaction of the conversion process and the deintercalation of Na+. In the second and third cathodic scans, the cathodic peak potentials shift noticeably compared to the first cycle due to the irreversible phase transformation and structural evolution of NiCo2S4@CDs. However, the CV curves of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode almost completely overlap after the first cycle, indicating its excellent electrochemical reversibility.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 4. (a) CV curves of NiCo2S4@CDs in SIBs. (b) Ex-situ XRD patterns at discharge to 1.2, 0.8, 0.05 V and charge to 0.5, 2.5 V of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode. Ex-situ XPS spectra of (c) Co 2p, (d) Ni 2p at discharge to 1.2, 0.05 V and charge to 1.8, 2.5 V of the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode. | |
Subsequently, ex-situ XRD and ex-situ XPS measurements were implemented to examine the phase change of NiCo2S4@CDs electrode during oxidation and reduction. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed on the NiCo2S4@CDs electrode material at different voltage states under 0.2 A/g, and the ex-situ XRD characterization observations are presented in Fig. 4b. During discharge to 1.2 V, the NiCo2S4@CDs phase still exists due to the intercalation of Na+. However, upon further discharge to 0.8 V to 0.05 V, the NiCo2S4@CDs phase disappears, and new Co, Ni, and Na2S phases emerge upon reaction with Na+. The diffraction peak located at 44.9° can be attributed to the (011) plane of metallic Ni (JCPDS card No. 45-1027), whereas the peak observed at 47.3° corresponds to the (101) plane of metallic Co (JCPDS card No. 05-0727). In addition, the characteristic peak at 37.89° belongs to the (542) plane of Na2S (JCPDS card No. 47-1078). When charged to 0.5 V, the Co, Ni, and Na2S phases still exist. With the proceeding of the reverse reaction and Na+ extraction until full charging, the Co, Ni, and Na2S phases are completely eliminated, while new diffraction peaks appearing at 38.56°, 31.0°, 26.4°, and 55.23° correspond to the (400), (311), (220), and (440) planes of NiCo2S4@CDs, confirming the reversibility of NiCo2S4@CDs and corresponding to the oxidation–reduction process reflected in the CV curve.
The reaction mechanism of NiCo2S4@CDs was further verified by ex-situ XPS (Figs. 4c and d). Compared to the original Ni 2p spectrum in Fig. 2b, the Ni2+ and Ni3+ bands remain consistent when discharged to 1.2 V. At 0.05 V discharge, the Ni2+ and Ni3+ bands decrease, and a new Ni0 band appears at 848.2 and 865.2 eV [8,43]. When charged to 1.8 V, the Ni0 band still exists due to the incomplete reverse reaction. At 2.5 V full charge, the Ni0 band disappears, and the Ni2+ and Ni3+ bands reappear. In the Co 2p spectrum, compared to the original state in Fig. 2c, Co3+ gradually decreases during discharge, confirming the occurrence of reduction. A new metallic Co0 (774.3/789.8 eV) is observed during the reaction [8,45]. The charge proceeds until full charge, and Co2+ and Co3+ are restored to the initial state, indicating reversibility. The ex-situ XPS findings are consistent with the ex-situ XRD results, providing further support for the intercalation/conversion reaction mechanism of NiCo2S4@CDs.
In summary, cobalt–nickel bimetal coordination polymer with nanosheets cross-stacked architecture has been successfully prepared as precursor via simple co-precipitation reaction. Subsequently, high-temperature sulfidation method and carbon dots loading processes were successively adopted to prepare the final NiCo2S4@CDs. Due to the synergistic effects of Co/Ni based bimetallic sulfides, the introduction of carbon dots and the unique cross-stacked architecture, NiCo2S4@CDs demonstrates a higher discharge specific capacity compared to pure NiCo2S4. Furthermore, NiCo2S4@CDs also delivers an ultra-long cycle life with a discharge specific capacity of 302.9 mAh/g after 750 cycles at 5.0 A/g. Besides, ex-situ XRD and ex-situ XPS were further applied to investigate the sodium storage process of NiCo2S4@CDs. The obtained results were in line with the above-mentioned electrochemical and battery property results. This study presents an effective approach for the development of high-performance anode materials for SIBs.
Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52101243), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2023A1515012619) and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (No. 202201010565).
Supplementary materialsSupplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108921.
| [1] |
M. Guo, S.Y. Dong, J. Xiong, et al., Mater. Today Chem. 30 (2023) 101552. DOI:10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101552 |
| [2] |
P.F. Wan, S.Y. Dong, J. Xiong, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 650 (2023) 582-592. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.022 |
| [3] |
M. Guo, J. Xiong, X.Y. Jin, et al., J. Membr. Sci. 675 (2023) 121533. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121533 |
| [4] |
M. Guo, H.Y. Zhu, P.F. Wan, et al., Adv. Fiber Mater. 6 (2022) 1511-1524. DOI:10.1007/s42765-022-00190-3 |
| [5] |
P. Wei, X. Sun, Z. He, et al., Fuel 339 (2023) 127303. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127303 |
| [6] |
M.Q. Wang, B.Y. Qin, S.M. Wu, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 650 (2023) 1457-1465. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.071 |
| [7] |
S.M. Wu, F. Xu, Y.N. Li, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 649 (2023) 741-749. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.159 |
| [8] |
H. Zhao, J. Zhong, Y. Qi, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 465 (2023) 143032. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2023.143032 |
| [9] |
H.S. Zhao, Y.L. Qi, K. Liang, et al., Rare Met. 41 (2021) 1284-1293. DOI:10.3390/sym13071284 |
| [10] |
K. Liang, H. Zhao, J. Li, et al., Small 19 (2023) 2207562. DOI:10.1002/smll.202207562 |
| [11] |
M.Q. Wang, B.Y. Qin, F. Xu, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 650 (2023) 446-455. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.007 |
| [12] |
B.Y. Qin, M.Q. Wang, Z.T. Liu, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 646 (2023) 597-605. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.05.077 |
| [13] |
Y. Miao, X. Zhao, X. Wang, et al., Nano Res. 13 (2020) 3041-3047. DOI:10.1007/s12274-020-2969-4 |
| [14] |
X.Y. Yu, X.W. David Lou, Adv. Energy Mater. 8 (2018) 1701592. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201701592 |
| [15] |
F. Wang, X. Liu, G. Duan, et al., Small 17 (2021) 2102532. DOI:10.1002/smll.202102532 |
| [16] |
M. Yousaf, U. Naseer, I. Ali, et al., Sci. China Mater. 65 (2021) 559-592. |
| [17] |
J. Li, J. Zhou, Q. Zhou, et al., J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 82 (2021) 114-121. DOI:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.12.021 |
| [18] |
B. Liu, D. Kong, Y. Wang, et al., FlatChem 10 (2018) 14-21. DOI:10.1016/j.flatc.2018.07.002 |
| [19] |
Y. Zhu, J. Li, X. Yun, et al., Nano-Micro Lett. 12 (2020) 16. DOI:10.3390/chemengineering4010016 |
| [20] |
S. Li, P. Ge, F. Jiang, et al., Energy Storage Mater. 16 (2019) 267-280. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2018.06.006 |
| [21] |
J. Yu, D. Cai, J. Si, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 4100-4109. DOI:10.1039/d1ta10597c |
| [22] |
X. Zhou, Y. Wang, C. Gong, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 402 (2020) 126189. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126189 |
| [23] |
Z. Sun, C. Zhao, X. Cao, et al., Electrochim. Acta 338 (2020) 135900. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135900 |
| [24] |
S. Fan, H. Liu, S. Bi, et al., Electrochim. Acta 388 (2021) 138618. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138618 |
| [25] |
J.S. Wei, H. Ding, P. Zhang, et al., Small 12 (2016) 5927-5934. DOI:10.1002/smll.201602164 |
| [26] |
H. Hou, C.E. Banks, M. Jing, et al., Adv. Mater. 27 (2015) 7861-7866. DOI:10.1002/adma.201503816 |
| [27] |
L. Zhang, Y. Yang, M.A. Ziaee, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (2018) 9460-9467. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b00211 |
| [28] |
X. Li, M. Rui, J. Song, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 (2015) 4929-4947. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201501250 |
| [29] |
G. Cai, P. Yan, L. Zhang, et al., Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 12278-12326. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00243 |
| [30] |
G. Chakraborty, I.H. Park, R. Medishetty, et al., Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 3751-3891. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01049 |
| [31] |
H. Zhu, S. Dong, J. Xiong, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 641 (2023) 942-949. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.083 |
| [32] |
J. Li, N. Xu, Q. Han, et al., J. Alloys Compd. 927 (2022) 167067. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167067 |
| [33] |
B. Guo, T. Yang, W. Du, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 12276-12282. DOI:10.1039/c9ta02695a |
| [34] |
H. Chen, X. Ma, P.K. Shen, Chem. Eng. J. 364 (2019) 167-176. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.119 |
| [35] |
R. Zhai, Y. Xiao, T. Ding, et al., J. Alloys Compd. 845 (2020) 156164. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156164 |
| [36] |
C. Zhang, X. Cai, Y. Qian, et al., Adv. Sci. 5 (2018) 170037. |
| [37] |
X. Li, H. Liang, B. Qin, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 625 (2022) 41-49. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2022.05.155 |
| [38] |
B. Li, C. Song, J. Rong, et al., J. Energy Chem. 50 (2020) 195-205. DOI:10.1016/j.jechem.2019.12.018 |
| [39] |
J. Li, X. Yun, Z. Hu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 26311-26325. DOI:10.1039/c9ta08151h |
| [40] |
R. Jia, F. Zhu, S. Sun, et al., J. Power Sources 341 (2017) 427-434. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.014 |
| [41] |
J.Y. Lin, S.J. Lu, Y.F. Zhang, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 645 (2023) 654-662. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.04.107 |
| [42] |
C. Liu, X. Wu, B. Wang, Chem. Eng. J. 392 (2020) 123651. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.123651 |
| [43] |
T. Li, Y. Xia, H. Wu, et al., Nanoscale 14 (2022) 10226-10235. DOI:10.1039/d2nr02232j |
| [44] |
T. Xu, J. Zhao, J. Yang, et al., Ionics (Kiel) 26 (2019) 213-221. DOI:10.3390/genes10030213 |
| [45] |
J. Xiong, X.Y. Liu, P. Xia, et al., J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 652 (2023) 1417-1426. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.08.185 |
2024, Vol. 35 

