b State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
c National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science & Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Artificial Functional Materials & Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
Dielectric capacitors with giant power density and ultrafast charge/discharge rate have been popularly used in high-power and pulsed-power electronic devices, including hybrid vehicles, distributed power systems. Yet, the relatively low energy density of dielectric capacitors has become an unavoidable obstacle for the progress of integrated and/or portable devices. Hence, extensive effort has been put in to enhance the energy density of dielectric capacitors for their future applications [1–4].
Among various dielectrics, bismuth sodium titanate (Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3, BNT)-based relaxor ferroelectric ceramics are widely considered as one of up-and-coming materials for capacitive energy storage [1–3,5]. Relaxor ferroelectric ceramics generally possess moderate Pmax and small Pr induced by polar nanoregions (PNRs) with short-range ferroelectric orders, thus giving rise to moderate Wrec (> 2 J/cm3) and high η (> 80%). As for BNT ceramics, the strong hybridization between 6s2 lone pair electrons of Bi3+ and 2p orbitals of O2− triggers a relatively large Pmax of ~43 µC/cm2 [6–8]. But the nonergodic relaxor properties of BNT ceramics cause square polarization-electric-field loops (P-E) with large Pr, which seriously hampers the enhancement of energy storage performances [9]. In addition, the Bi3+ ions are volatile during sintering under high temperature, leading to the emergence of oxygen vacancies in ceramics. Therefore, the role of oxygen vacancies in the capacitive energy storage properties of BNT-based ceramics still lacks enough research.
Herein, the non-stoichiometric Sr(Zr1/3Mg1/3Nb1/3)O3-δ (SZMN) was incorporated into BNT matrix to generate the oxygen vacancies. The introduction of various ions facilitates disturbing the long-rang ferroelectric orders and promoting the formation of PNRs [1,3]. Additionally, the defect dipole induced by oxygen vacancies contributes to decrease Pr [10]. Consequently, when the applied electric field reached 520 kV/cm, the 0.75BNT-0.25SZMN ceramics exhibited a giant Wrec of 8.3 J/cm3 and a high η of 85%, foreshadowing great prospects in capacitive energy storage.
The (1-x)BNT-xSZMN (x = 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30) ceramics were synthetized by solid state reaction. The crystal structure of (1-x)BNT-xSZMN ceramics was detected by X-ray diffraction (XRD), as displayed in Fig. 1a. The pure perovskite structure for all samples is identified by the typical diffraction peaks, suggesting the introduced dopants have successfully diffused into BNT matrix. The microstructure obtained via scanning electron microscope (SEM) are provided in Fig. S1 (Supporting information). All the samples show dense microstructure. With increasing x, the grain size decreases obviously, which is advantageous to achieve high Eb.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns of (1-x)BNT-xSZMN ceramics. (b) Temperature dependent εr at 10 kHz for x = 0.10–0.25. | |
Fig. S2 (Supporting information) depict the temperature dependent dielectric constant (εr) and loss (tanδ) of (1-x)BNT-xSZMN ceramics under different frequencies. The wide dielectric peaks, the frequency dependent εr, and the increasing Tm (i.e., temperature corresponding to maximum εr (εr, m)) with increasing frequency demonstrate the dielectric relaxor behavior for each sample [6]. Accordingly, the frequency dependent tanδ also confirms the relaxor property. Furthermore, a sharp decrement in tanδ at high temperature is observed, which is ascribed to temperature activated increasing content of defects, such as oxygen vacancies [9]. To better compare the evolution of εr for different samples, Fig. 1b plots the composition dependent εr at 10 kHz for x = 0.10–0.25. Evidently, the dielectric peak becomes more and more wider with increasing x because of the A/B-site disorder and charge fluctuation, implying the improved dielectric realxor behavior. As a result, the εr and Tm significantly decrease with increasing x (Fig. 1b). Notably, the temperature insensitive εr is highly applicable for high temperature capacitors [6].
Fig. 2a illustrates the composition dependent bipolar P-E loops of (1-x)BNT-xSZMN ceramics at room temperature. The applied electric field and frequency are 100 kV/cm and 10 Hz, respectively. And the corresponding evolution of Pmax, Pr and Pmax-Pr is exhibited in Fig. S3 (Supporting information). With increasing x, the P-E loop goes slimmer and slimmer, owing to the improved dielectric relaxor behavior. Accordingly, the polarization reduces significantly, especially for Pmax. This phenomenon is consistent with reduced εr (Fig. 1b), because the polarization and dielectric constant show positive relationship [3]. In addition, the concentration of oxygen vacancies, which is confirmed by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), increases by incorporating non-stoichiometric SZMN, giving rise to the emergence of defect dipole. It is well-documented that the defect dipole can construct a built-in electric field, which helps the polarization revert to the initial disorder state [10]. Accordingly, a pinned P-E loop with further reduced Pr is observed (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). Owing to the co-contribution of improved relaxor behavior and construction of defect dipole, the Pr of (1-x)BNT-xSZMN ceramics decreases from 8.0 µC/cm2 for x = 0.10 to 0.5 µC/cm2 for x = 0.30. However, the decrement in Pmax is larger than that in Pr, resulting in continuous decrement in Pmax-Pr. Fig. 2b displays the variation of Wrec, Wt and η as a function of x. Both Wrec and Wt decrease monotonically with increasing x because of the gradual decrement in Pmax and Pmax-Pr, while the η increases from 67% for x = 0.10 to 89% for x = 0.30 owing to successive decrement in Pr. Considering the balance between Wrec and η, the x = 0.25 sample is selected for further investigation.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 2. (a) Bipolar P-E loops of (1-x)BNT-xSZMN ceramics. Composition dependent (b) Wrec, Wt, η. | |
Fig. 3a exhibits the unipolar P-E loops of the x = 0.25 sample under different electric fields. And the corresponding electric field dependent Pmax, Pr and Pmax-Pr are plotted in Fig. S6 (Supporting information). Under various electric fields, the P-E loops always maintain the slim profiles with increased Pmax and Pr. The Pmax and Pr of x = 0.25 sample reaches 48.9 and 3.7 µC/cm2 at 520 kV/cm, respectively, leading to the large Pmax-Pr value of 45.2 µC/cm2. Nevertheless, the discrepancy between Pmax-Pr and Pmax becomes larger and larger (Fig. S6 in Supporting information) owing to the high electric field induced leakage.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 3. (a) Electric field dependent unipolar P-E loops of the x = 0.25 sample, and (b) corresponding Wrec, Wt, η. Comparison of (c) Wrec and η, and (d) Wrec and E between the x = 0.25 sample and other BNT-based ceramic capacitors. | |
Based on the evolution of Pmax, Pr and Pmax-Pr, the Wrec and Wt of the x = 0.25 sample increase monotonically with increasing electric field, while the η gradually decreases, as plotted in Fig. 3b. At the highest applied electric field, the Wrec, Wt and η achieve 8.3 J/cm3, 9.8 J/cm3 and 85%, respectively. Notably, besides the large value of Pmax-Pr, the endurance for high electric field up to 520 kV/cm also facilitates obtaining ultrahigh energy density.
To evaluate the superiority in capacitive energy storage, the comparison between the x = 0.25 sample and other BNT-based ceramic capacitors is illustrated in Figs. 3c and d [9,11–27]. The detailed information about composition, values of Wrec, η and corresponding electric field is listed in Table S1 (Supporting information). It can be seen that the x = 0.25 sample achieves the ultrahigh Wrec of 8.3 J/cm3 and high η of 85%, exceeding the most of BNT-based ceramic capacitors, indicating the introduction of proper oxygen vacancies facilitates improving capacitive energy storage performances.
The reliability of capacitive energy storage properties under various conditions is of importance for the practical applications. Fig. 4a shows the cycle number dependent unipolar P-E loops of the x = 0.25 sample. The applied electric field and frequency is 300 kV/cm and 10 Hz, respectively. When the cycle numbers reach 106, the P-E loops always remain slim profiles with stable Pmax, Pr and Pmax-Pr (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). Accordingly, the Wrec and η are 4.1 J/cm3 and 89% (Fig. 4b), respectively, foreshadowing excellent fatigue behavior. The changeable ambient temperature is inevitable for electronic devices. For example, the operating temperature for the power system of hybrid vehicles can reach as high as 140 ℃. The usage of dielectric capacitors with good thermal reliability favors removing extra cooling systems [7,28]. Fig. 4c depicts the unipolar P-E loops of the x = 0.25 sample in the temperature range of 25–140 ℃. The P-E loops gradually become fatter with increased Pmax and Pr (Fig. S7 in Supporting information), which is scribed to the activation of introduced oxygen vacancies and high temperature induced defects [7]. Consequently, the η decreases from the Pmax-Pr slightly decreases from 34.1 µC/cm2 at 25 ℃ to 31.1 µC/cm2 at 140 ℃ because of the simultaneous increment of Pmax and Pr. Accordingly, the Wrec and η decrease from 4.1 J/cm3 and 89% to 3.5 J/cm3 and 73% with increasing temperature (Fig. 4d). The variation of Wrec and η are 14.6% and 18.0%, indicating promising application in high temperature capacitors. Fig. S8 (Supporting information) plots the comparison of temperature dependent Wrec of x = 0.25 and other reported BNT-based ceramic capacitors, further suggesting the excellent thermal stability of the x = 0.25 sample.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 4. (a, b) Anti-fatigue and (c, d) thermal reliability of energy storage properties for the x = 0.25 sample. | |
In summary, the non-stoichiometric (1-x)BNT-xSZMN relaxor ferroelectric ceramics were prepared by solid state reaction. The XRD confirmed that the all samples exhibited pure perovskite structure without secondary phase. The temperature dependent εr demonstrated the improved dielectric relaxor behavior. The P-E loops went slimmer with reduced Pmax and Pr due to the synergic effect of dielectric relaxor properties and oxygen vacancies induced defect dipole. Accordingly, an exceptional high Wrec of 8.3 J/cm3 and a high η of 85% were simultaneously achieved in optimal composition of 0.75BNT-0.25SZMN ceramics. Meanwhile, this sample exhibited excellent anti-fatigue (10°–106) and thermal reliability (25–140 ℃). These results suggest that the BNT-based ceramic capacitors are superb alternatives for capacitive energy storage.
Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12004181, 52073144), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Nos. BK20200473, BK20201301) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 30922010309).
Supplementary materialsSupplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108955.
| [1] |
H. Zhang, T. Wei, Q. Zhang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 8 (2020) 16648-16667. DOI:10.1039/d0tc04381h |
| [2] |
F. Zhuo, H. Qiao, J. Zhu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2097-2107. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.070 |
| [3] |
X. Fan, J. Wang, H. Yuan, et al., J. Adv. Ceram. 12 (2023) 649-680. DOI:10.26599/jac.2023.9220703 |
| [4] |
Z. Sun, J. Zhang, H. Luo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 6194-6202. DOI:10.1021/jacs.2c12200 |
| [5] |
H. Li, L. Wang, Y. Zhu, P. Jiang, X. Huang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2229-2232. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.12.032 |
| [6] |
T. Cui, J. Zhang, J. Guo, et al., Acta Mater. 240 (2022) 118286. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118286 |
| [7] |
H. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Jiang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 11 (2023) 4937-4945. DOI:10.1039/d2ta10098c |
| [8] |
H. Liu, Z. Sun, J. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2023) 11764-11772. |
| [9] |
N. Weng, J. Zhang, J. Wang, et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 106 (2023) 2963-2971. DOI:10.1111/jace.18977 |
| [10] |
W. Cao, W. Li, Y. Feng, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 (2016) 202902. DOI:10.1063/1.4950974 |
| [11] |
Y.N. Huang, J. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A 11 (2023) 7987-7994. DOI:10.1039/d3ta00068k |
| [12] |
H. Ji, D. Wang, W. Bao, et al., Energy Storage Mater. 38 (2021) 113-120. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.023 |
| [13] |
C. Zhang, W. Xiao, F. Zeng, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 9 (2021) 10088-10094. DOI:10.1039/d1ta01442k |
| [14] |
F. Yan, K. Huang, T. Jing, et al., Energy Storage Mater. 30 (2020) 392-400. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.026 |
| [15] |
J. Huang, H. Qi, Y. Gao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 398 (2020) 125639. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.125639 |
| [16] |
H. Qi, R. Zuo, J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 3971-3978. DOI:10.1039/c8ta12232f |
| [17] |
C. Zhu, Z. Cai, B. Luo, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 28484-28492. DOI:10.1021/acsami.1c06075 |
| [18] |
X. Li, X. Dong, F. Wang, et al., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 42 (2022) 2221-2229. DOI:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.12.028 |
| [19] |
D. Li, Y. Lin, Q. Yuan, et al., J. Materiomics 6 (2020) 743-750. |
| [20] |
D. Hu, Z. Pan, L. Wu, et al., J. Materiomics 7 (2021) 869-878. DOI:10.1016/j.jmat.2020.12.006 |
| [21] |
S. Bian, Z. Yue, Y. Shi, J. Zhang, W. Feng, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 104 (2021) 936-947. DOI:10.1111/jace.17486 |
| [22] |
D. Li, D. Zhou, W. Liu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 419 (2021) 129601. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2021.129601 |
| [23] |
X. Qiao, A. Sheng, D. Wu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 408 (2021) 127368. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127368 |
| [24] |
M. Li, M. Zhu, M. Zheng, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 10 (2022) 8845-8853. DOI:10.1039/d2tc00812b |
| [25] |
X. Qiao, F. Zhang, D. Wu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 388 (2020) 124158. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.124158 |
| [26] |
Y. Chen, Y. Huang, Y. Zuo, et al., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 42 (2022) 6985-6996. DOI:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.030 |
| [27] |
W. Shi, L. Zhang, R. Jing, et al., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 42 (2022) 4528-4538. DOI:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.04.057 |
| [28] |
S. Jiang, J. Zhang, J. Wang, et al., Scr. Mater. 235 (2023) 115602. DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115602 |
2024, Vol. 35 

