b Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Urban Environmental Processes and Pollution Control, Ningbo Urban Environment Observation and Research Station, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315800, China;
c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
d State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Air pollution problems such as PM2.5 and O3 have become increasingly urgent environmental challenges. The control of NOx, especially that emitted from diesel vehicles, is an effective way to realize co-control of PM2.5 and O3 pollution [1-4]. The NH3-SCR device is applied in the after-treatment system of diesel vehicles for the abatement of NOx. Among NH3-SCR catalysts, Cu-based small-pore zeolites are known for their excellent catalytic activity and hydrothermal stability, with Cu-SSZ-13 realizing commercialization [5,6]. In addition to Cu-SSZ-13, some other Cu-based small-pore zeolites also have high potential for industrial application [7-11]. Cu-SSZ-50 with the RTH structure (Scheme S1 in Supporting information) has been demonstrated to perform well in NH3-SCR [12,13]. There are two Cu2+ species existing in Cu-SSZ-50 zeolites: α Cu2+ species are more SCR-active and located near 8-membered rings (8mr), while β Cu2+ species located near rth cages are less SCR-active (Scheme S2 in Supporting information). Cu2+ species are preferentially located near rth cages; therefore, Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts present poor SCR activity when Cu loading is low. When the β Cu2+ location is occupied, more α Cu2+ species form, and Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts show high NOx conversion with high Cu loading [14].
Although Cu-SSZ-50 with appropriate Cu loading possesses good NH3-SCR activity, its weak hydrothermal stability casts a shadow on its application for diesel vehicles [12]. It was found that the accumulation of Cu ions was the main reason causing inactivation. However, higher Cu loading may hinder the migration of Cu ions; therefore, Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with higher Cu/Al ratios showed better hydrothermal stability [14]. Thus, increasing the amount of active Cu ions and simultaneously avoiding the formation of a large amount of CuxOy species may improve the hydrothermal stability of Cu-SSZ-50.
The traditional methods for the synthesis of Cu-SSZ-50 require expensive templates and long crystallization times [15,16]. Xu et al. used 2,6-dimethyl-N-methylpyridinium as a template and obtained RTH zeolite in 12 h, which improved the application prospects of Cu-SSZ-50 [17]. However, several ion-exchange processes are still needed to obtain Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts. Ren et al. first invented the one-pot synthesis of Cu-SSZ-13 with Cu-TEPA as the only template [18,19]. However, the Cu content of the Cu-SSZ-13 synthesized by this method is rather high, and post-treatment processes are needed to obtain better catalytic performance. Subsequently, Corma et al. utilized TMAda and Cu-TEPA as co-templates to synthesize Cu-SSZ-13 with controllable Cu content [20]. In addition to Cu-SSZ-13, the one-pot synthesis of Cu-SAPO-34 and Cu-SSZ-39 have also been accomplished by Corma et al., following the co-template strategy [21,22]. Inspired by these studies, the one-pot synthesis of Cu-SSZ-50 using 2,6-dimethyl-N-methylpyridinium hydroxide and Cu-TEPA as co-templates was conducted in this study. Furthermore, in the synthesis of Cu-SSZ-13, the molecular size of TEPA is smaller than the traditional template TMAdaOH; therefore, Na+ ions occupy the free space, resulting in a lower Si/Al ratio [18,19]. A lower Si/Al ratio creates more ion-exchange sites for Cu species, which may hinder the mobility of Cu2+ ions. Therefore, introducing Cu-TEPA as the co-template may help to decrease the Si/Al ratio of Cu-SSZ-50, while also improving the hydrothermal stability.
In this study, to optimize the synthesis process and catalytic performance of Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, the one-pot synthesis method was developed. By changing the amount of Cu-TEPA, Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with various Cu/Al ratios were obtained without the need for a further after-treatment process. The obtained Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with various Cu/Al ratios were tested for their NH3-SCR performance and characterized by various methods, including XRD, SEM, NMR, ICP-OES, EPR, H2-TPR, and NH3-TPD. Furthermore, the catalytic activity and hydrothermal stability of one-pot-synthesized and ion-exchanged Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with similar Cu/Al ratios were compared. Finally, the NH3-SCR reaction mechanism of the one-pot synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 was investigated by in situ DRIFTS experiments.
The XRD patterns of the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts are shown in Fig. 1a. All the Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with various Cu/Al ratios showed the RTH structure with good crystallization. However, the crystallinity of OP-0.40 was a little lower than that of the other catalysts, and the diffraction peak of CuO (38.7°) was observed in the pattern. The XRD patterns of the hydrothermally aged Cu-SSZ-50 samples prepared by one-pot synthesis and ion-exchange methods are presented in Fig. S1 (Supporting information). After hydrothermal aging at 750 ℃ for 16 h, both OP-0.40 HTA and IE-0.42 HTA kept the RTH structure with good crystallization. A characteristic diffraction peak of CuO (38.7°) was observed for OP-0.40 HTA but not IE-0.42 HTA [23].
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns, (b) 27Al NMR, (c) SEM images, (d) TG-DSC curves of the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts. | |
27Al NMR spectra were utilized to investigate the coordination environment of Al atoms in the prepared catalysts, and the spectra are presented in Fig. 1b. The peaks at chemical shifts of 56 ppm and 0 ppm are assigned to the tetrahedral and octahedral Al atoms, respectively [24]. Only a weak peak at 0 ppm corresponding to extra-framework Al atoms can be observed in the spectrum of OP-0.13, and no peak at 0 ppm emerged for OP-0.22, OP-0.34 or OP-0.40 [25]. This result was in accordance with the XRD results showing that the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts were well-crystallized.
The SEM image of OP-0.40 presented in Fig. 1c shows that it consists of particles around 200 nm in size with relatively uniform shape. The SEM images of the catalysts with other Cu/Al ratios are presented in Fig. S2 (Supporting information), and they also present uniform shapes. Compared with the previously reported conventional SSZ-50, the particle sizes of the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts were not quite as uniform [13]. This result indicates that Cu-TEPA can influence the morphology of Cu-SSZ-50, although the particles were still in a cubic form.
The elemental compositions of the catalysts are summarized in Table S1 (Supporting information), according to the results of ICP-OES. Compared with IE-0.42, more Na+ ions existed in the one-pot-synthesized catalysts. This is because three ion-exchange processes were conducted to obtain IE-0.42, while no aftertreatment process was carried out for the one-pot-synthesized catalysts. Furthermore, the Si/Al ratios of the one-pot-synthesized catalysts were similar to that of IE-0.42, except for OP-0.40. The Si/Al ratio of OP-0.40 was relatively low among the prepared catalysts, probably due to the addition of abundant Cu-TEPA, resulting in higher Cu content compared with the IE-0.42 sample of similar Cu/Al ratio.
TG-DSC was used to investigate the weight changes of the catalysts as a function of temperature, with all samples being derived from the initial products without any calcination. The TG and DSC curves for the conventional SSZ-50 sample are presented in Fig. S3 (Supporting information). A major exothermic peak emerged at around 600 ℃ with a weight loss of about 15%, indicating the decomposition of the sole template (2,6-dimethyl-N-methylpyridinium hydroxide) [13]. Meanwhile, the curves for the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 are shown in Fig. 1d. Two major exothermic peaks appeared around 400 ℃ and 550 ℃, with a total weight loss of about 25%. According to the results in Fig. S3 and previous reports, these two exothermic peaks were assigned to the decomposition of TEPA (400 ℃) and 2,6-dimethyl-N-methylpyridinium hydroxide (550 ℃), respectively [13,18,19].
NH3-SCR activity tests were carried out for the Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, and the results are shown in Fig. 2. For the one-pot-synthesized catalysts, NOx conversion improved with increasing Cu/Al ratio over the whole temperature range. This phenomenon indicated that Cu ions can deposit in the active sites of Cu-SSZ-50 with only a small amount accumulating outside the cavities. A decrease in NOx conversion was observed over 500 ℃ for all the catalysts, which could be due to the presence of some CuxOy species facilitating NH3 oxidation. A dramatic increase in catalytic activity was seen when Cu/Al increased from 0.13 to 0.22. A similar phenomenon was also observed in the conventional Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts previously reported by our group [14]. The OP-0.40 sample showed the best catalytic performance, with over 90% NOx conversion obtained from 200 ℃ to 450 ℃. Therefore, the hydrothermal stability of OP-0.40 was further tested and compared with that of the ion-exchanged Cu-SSZ-50 catalyst with similar Cu/Al ratio. For the fresh catalysts, OP-0.40 presented better catalytic activity in both the low- and high-temperature ranges. After hydrothermal treatment, the gap between the NOx conversion of OP-0.40 HTA and IE-0.42 HTA became even larger, and over 80% NOx conversion could be obtained from 250 ℃ to 450 ℃ for OP-0.40 HTA. The N2O concentrations and N2 selectivity of the prepared catalysts during NH3-SCR activity test were shown in Fig. S4 (Supporting information). Compared with IE-0.42 and IE-0.42-HTA, more N2O was emitted for OP-0.40 and OP-0.40-HTA, respectively. Nevertheless, less than 15 ppm of N2O and over 96% N2 selectivity was obtained for all the catalysts at the tested temperatures, indicating that the prepared catalysts possessed high N2 selectivity.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 2. (a) NH3-SCR activity results for the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts; (b) Catalytic activity and hydrothermal stability results of OP-0.40 and IE-0.42. | |
An NH3 oxidation test was carried out for OP-0.40 and IE-0.42, and the results are presented in Fig. S5 (Supporting information). IE-0.42 presented higher NH3 oxidation conversion than OP-0.40 over 350 ℃, which explained why OP-0.40 possessed better NH3-SCR activity than IE-0.42 at high temperature. A SO2 resistance test was also conducted for OP-0.40 and IE-0.42, with the results being shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information). Nearly 100% NOx conversion was obtained with OP-0.40 and IE-0.42 at 250 ℃. When 50 ppm SO2 was introduced, a dramatic decrease in NOx conversion can be seen for both catalysts. IE-0.42 possessed higher NOx conversion than OP-0.40 before 80 min, while the NOx conversion over OP-0.40 was a little higher after that. When SO2 was cut off, the NOx conversion for OP-0.40 and IE-0.42 did not increase significantly. However, after regeneration at 600 ℃, NOx conversion was recovered to the level observed under fresh conditions for both catalysts. The results indicated the SCR activity of Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts was significantly affected by SO2; meanwhile, regeneration was an effective way to recover activity.
EPR experiments were carried out to investigate the coordination environment of Cu2+ ions, with the spectra shown in Fig. 3. All the tested catalysts presented fourfold split hyperfine spectra with gII = 2.37 and AII = 140 G, which further proved that Cu2+ ions can be deposited at “ion-exchange sites” [26,27]. To quantify the amount of Cu ions, the relative Cu contents of the catalysts were calculated by quadratic integration of the EPR signals, and the results are presented in Fig. S7 (Supporting information). The relative Cu contents of the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts increased with the Cu/Al ratio. The trend of the EPR signals for the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 was in accordance with the ICP results. In Fig. 3b, the EPR results of OP-0.40 and IE-0.42 before and after hydrothermal aging are compared. The relative Cu contents followed the order OP-0.40 > IE-0.42 > OP-0.40 HTA > IE-0.42 HTA. Although the Cu/Al ratios of OP-0.40 and IE-0.42 were similar, the EPR-active Cu2+ ions of these two catalysts were clearly different. As the ICP results showed, the Si/Al ratio of OP-0.40 was lower than that of IE-0.42, indicating the presence of more electronic defects in OP-0.40 for the deposition of Cu2+ ions. Therefore, OP-0.40 showed better catalytic activity than IE-0.42, as illustrated in Fig. 2b. Furthermore, after hydrothermal aging, a dramatic decrease in the amount of Cu2+ ions was observed in the EPR spectra for both OP-0.40 HTA and IE-0.42 HTA (Fig. 3b and Fig. S7), inducing a decrease in NOx conversion for both catalysts (Fig. 2b). More Cu2+ ions were obtained in OP-0.40 HTA than IE-0.42 HTA; thus, OP-0.40 HTA performed better in the NH3-SCR test.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 3. EPR spectra of (a) one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, (b) fresh and hydrothermally aged OP-0.40 and IE-0.42. | |
H2-TPR experiments were carried out to investigate the redox ability of the prepared catalysts as well to help distinguish the Cu species, with the profiles displayed in Fig. 4. Shan et al. thoroughly investigated the species of Cu2+ ions in RTH zeolites, and two kinds of Cu2+ ions were proposed, named α- and β-Cu ions. α Cu ions were located at relatively unstable sites where Cu2+ ions are more easily reduced, while β-Cu ions occupied relatively stable sites with lower redox ability [14]. The proposed locations of the two Cu2+ species are illustrated in Scheme S2; however, precise identification of the Cu2+ ions sites will require further investigation. For all the prepared catalysts, peak A was assigned to α-Cu ions (Cu(OH)+), peak B was attributed to CuxOy species, and peak C to the reduction of β-Cu ions (Cu2+) [14]. As can be seen, most of the Cu species were in the form of Cu ions, and only a small amount of CuxOy species existed, confirming that the formation of active Cu2+ ions is dominant in the one-pot synthesis. According to the peak areas, the relative contents of the two Cu ions and CuxOy species in the samples are summarized in Fig. S8 (Supporting information). For the one-pot-synthesized catalysts, both α- and β-Cu ions existed regardless of the Cu/Al ratio; however, α-Cu ions did not form until the Cu/Al ratio increased to 0.27 in the conventional Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts [14]. Furthermore, the amounts of both α- and β-Cu ions increased with the increase in the Cu/Al ratio, leading to improvement of the NH3-SCR performance of the one-pot-synthesized catalysts, as illustrated in Fig. 2a. The relative contents of CuxOy species are also summarized in Fig. S8, and CuxOy species can be observed in all the catalysts, accounting for the decrease in NOx conversion above 500 ℃. Although OP-0.40 HTA possessed more CuxOy species than IE-0.42 HTA, OP-0.40 HTA still performed better in the NH3-SCR reaction. The H2-TPR profiles of OP-0.40 and IE-0.42 before and after hydrothermal aging are compared in Fig. 4b. The peaks above 500 ℃ for OP-0.40 were assigned to the reduction of Cu+ to Cu0, and the peak D for the aged catalysts was attributed to CuAlOx species [28-30]. As can be seen in Fig. 4b and Fig. S8, the α-Cu ions disappeared after hydrothermal aging, and some of them transformed into β-Cu ions, indicating that α-Cu ions are unstable in the catalyst. The same phenomenon can be observed in Fig. S9 (Supporting information), where α-Cu ions transformed into β-Cu ions. On the other hand, more β-Cu ions were maintained in OP-0.40 HTA after hydrothermal aging compared to IE-0.42 HTA, which was in accordance with the EPR results and can explain the better hydrothermal stability of OP-0.40.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 4. H2-TPR profiles of (a) one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, (b) fresh and hydrothermally aged OP-0.40 and IE-0.42. | |
NH3-TPD was used to investigate the acidity of the prepared catalysts, and the profiles are shown in Fig. 5, with the acidity summarized in Fig. S10 (Supporting information). Peak A was assigned to weak acid sites mainly from terminal hydroxyl species or physically adsorbed NH3; peak B was attributed to medium acid sites, which are Lewis acid sites (Cu2+); and peak C corresponded to strong acid sites from Brønsted acid sites (Al-OH-Si) [24,31]. For the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, the total amount of acid sites increased with the Cu/Al ratio. Meanwhile, the amount of Lewis acid sites (Cu2+) also rose with the increase in Cu/Al ratios, which was in accordance with the results of EPR and H2-TPR. Acid sites, especially Lewis acid sites, are critical for the NH3-SCR reaction; thus, the results of NH3-TPD partially explained the trends of catalytic activity for the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50. In addition, OP-0.40 and IE-0.42 possessed similar amounts of acid sites of each type. It is worth mentioning that compared with OP-0.40 and IE-0.42, the peak area of B (Lewis acid sites) for OP-0.40 HTA and IE-0.42 HTA increased; meanwhile, the peak area of C (Brønsted acid sites) decreased dramatically. In situ DRIFTS of NH3 absorbance experiments were also carried out to detect the amount and intensity of acid sites. As presented in Fig. S11 (Supporting information), the peak at 1650~1600 cm−1 was attributed to Lewis acid sites (Cu2+ species), and the peak around 1500~1450 cm−1 was assigned to Brønsted acid sites (framework Al-OH). After hydrothermal aging, the intensity of peaks associated with Lewis acid sites increased and those of Brønsted acid sites decreased. A similar phenomenon was also observed in the study of Cu-SSZ-13. Cu(OH)+ species can transform into Cu species with the consumption of Brønsted acid sites during the hydrothermal aging process of Cu-SSZ-13, following the equation: Cu(OH)+ + H+ = Cu2+ + H2O. More NH3 molecules can be absorbed on Cu2+ species than Cu(OH)+ species; thus, the desorption of NH3 on Lewis acid sites increased [32,33]. In this study, some α-Cu ions transformed into β-Cu ions during the hydrothermal aging process, as presented in the H2-TPR results. α-Cu ions with better redox ability were in the form of ZCu(OH)+, and β-Cu ions were in the form of Cu2+. Therefore, the desorption of NH3 from Lewis acid sites increased and the desorption of NH3 from Brønsted acid sites decreased after hydrothermal aging of both OP-0.40 HTA and IE-0.42 HTA.
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 5. NH3-TPD profiles of (a) one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, (b) fresh and hydrothermally aged OP-0.40 and IE-0.42. | |
To investigate the NH3-SCR reaction process on the OP-0.40 catalyst, in situ DRIFTS experiments were carried out, and the results are presented in Fig. 6 and Fig. S12 (Supporting information). As presented in Fig. S12, the negative peaks at 3725 and 3599 cm−1 were attributed to the consumption of OH from Brønsted acid sites by NH3. The peaks at 3333, 3275 and 3187 cm−1 were assigned to the stretching vibration of N-H from NH4+ species. The peaks at 1621 and 1451 cm−1 corresponded to the bending vibration of N-H bonds from the adsorption of NH3 on Lewis acid sites and Brønsted acid sites, respectively [34,35]. Meanwhile, the negative peaks at 937 and 904 cm−1 were related to the release of α and β Cu2+ ions, which disturbed the skeleton T-O-T vibration by the coordination of Cu ions and NH3 [18]. Furthermore, after the introduction of NO and O2, the peaks appearing at 1609 and 1574 cm−1 were attributed to bridging nitrate species and bidentate nitrate species, respectively [36,37].
|
Download:
|
| Fig. 6. Color images of in situ DRIFTS spectra of (a) adsorbed NH3 and NO+O2 on OP-0.40, (b) adsorbed NO+O2 and NH3 on OP-0.40. | |
First, the reaction of adsorbed NH3 and NO+O2 was investigated, and color images of the in situ DRIFTS spectra are presented in Fig. 6a. When NO and O2 were introduced, NH3 adsorbed at Lewis acid sites (around 1621 cm−1) began to be consumed quickly. In the first 4 min, the peak around 1621 cm−1 decreased noticeably; however, due to the interference of nitrate species, this peak began to increase from the 6th min. Meanwhile, the consumption of NH3 adsorbed at Brønsted acid sites (around 1451 cm−1) was much slower, and the peak did not even decrease until the 4th min. The results above indicated that NH3 adsorbed at Lewis acid sites reacted with NO+O2 predominantly, following the E-R mechanism, while the NH3 adsorbed at Brønsted acid sites mainly played a complementary role.
Furthermore, the reaction processes of nitrate species and NH3 were investigated. Due to interference from NH3 adsorption peaks, the consumption of nitrate species cannot be seen in Fig. 6b. However, the peak change can be observed in Fig. S12b. With the introduction of NH3, the peaks at 1609 and 1574 cm−1 decreased simultaneously in the first several minutes. Due to the adsorption of NH3, the peak around 1621 cm−1 began to increase from the 5th min, interfering with the peak intensity at 1609 cm−1. The peak at 1574 cm−1 diminished from the 5th min, indicating that nitrate species were consumed in the first 5 min. The results above indicated that the nitrate species could react with NH3, following the L-H mechanism. Therefore, both the E-R mechanism and L-H mechanism existed on OP-0.40 during the NH3-SCR reaction process [38,39].
In this study, Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts were one-pot-synthesized using 2,6-dimethyl-N-methylpyridinium hydroxide and Cu-TEPA as co-templates. By changing the amount of Cu-TEPA, catalysts of various Cu/Al ratios with good crystallinity were obtained without further after-treatment. More importantly, the Cu2+ ions were predominantly deposited at active sites, despite the existence of a small amount of CuxOy species. In the conventional ion-exchanged Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, only β-Cu species existed when the Cu loading was low (<1.4 wt%) [14]. However, both α- and β-Cu species existed in the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50, regardless of the Cu/Al ratio. For one thing, abundant retained Na+ ions occupied the stable ion-exchange sites, which increased the difficulty of forming β-Cu species. For another, Cu-TEPA molecules were able to be accommodated in large cages initially, increasing the possibility of the formation of α-Cu species. CuxOy species formed easily in the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts, as illustrated by H2-TPR results. However, OP-0.40 still possessed better catalytic activity than IE-0.42 even in the high-temperature range, indicating that the existence of CuxOy species did not cause a dramatic decrease in NOx conversion.
The poor hydrothermal stability of Cu-SSZ-50 zeolites is a roadblock for their application in NOx abatement on diesel vehicles [12,14]. The RTH structure can endure the effects of steam up to 900 ℃ for 8 h, and the deactivation of Cu-SSZ-50 after hydrothermal aging at 750 ℃ for 16 h was mainly due to the loss of Cu2+ ions [14,16]. The conclusion was drawn from our previous study that Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with higher Cu/Al ratios possessed better hydrothermal stability [14]. It is worth noting that too much Cu-TEPA in the initial synthesis gel can influence the crystallization of Cu-SSZ-50; thus, the highest Cu/Al of the one-pot synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalyst was only 0.40. OP-0.40, with the largest amount of Cu-TEPA in the initial synthesis gel, could easily form more framework Al atoms, resulting in its relatively low Si/Al ratio compared to IE-0.42. Therefore, compared with IE-0.42, more Cu2+ ions existed in OP-0.40 owing to the lower Si/Al ratio. Higher Cu loading hinders the migration of Cu2+ ions; thus, more Cu2+ ions remained in OP-0.40 HTA. Therefore, OP-0.40 HTA possessed better NH3-SCR activity than IE-0.42 HTA.
In conclusion, Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with various Cu contents were produced via a one-pot synthesis method. All the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts were well-crystallized with hardly any extra-framework Al atoms. Both α- and β-Cu2+ species existed in the one-pot-synthesized Cu-SSZ-50 catalysts with a small portion of CuxOy species formed regardless of Cu content. Owing to the addition of Cu-TEPA, a lower Si/Al ratio was obtained in OP-0.40, and this catalyst possessed more active Cu2+ ions than IE-0.42. Higher Cu loading in OP-0.40 limited the Cu2+ ions’ mobility; therefore, it showed good hydrothermal stability. Furthermore, both the L-H and E-R mechanisms were observed in the NH3-SCR reaction process in OP-0.40.
Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
AcknowledgmentsThis work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52200136, 52225004 and 51978640) and the Science and Technology Innovation “2025” major program in Ningbo (No. 2020Z103)
Supplementary materialsSupplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108781.
| [1] |
D. Ding, J. Xing, S. Wang, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2022) 739-749. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.1c04201 |
| [2] |
Y. Tan, P. Henderick, S. Yoon, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (2019) 5504-5511. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.8b07048 |
| [3] |
S. Jiang, T. Li, J. Zheng, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (2020) 14740-14749. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c05152 |
| [4] |
P. Li, Y. Xin, Q. Li, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012) 9600-9605. DOI:10.1021/es301661r |
| [5] |
J.H. Kwak, D. Tran, J. Szanyi, C.H.F. Peden, J.H. Lee, Catal. Lett. 164 (2012) 295-301. DOI:10.1007/s10562-012-0771-y |
| [6] |
D.W. Fickel, E. D’Addio, J.A. Lauterbach, R.F. Lobo, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 102 (2011) 441-448. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.12.022 |
| [7] |
M. Moliner, C. Franch, E. Palomares, M. Grill, A. Corma, Chem. Commun. 48 (2012) 8264-8266. DOI:10.1039/c2cc33992g |
| [8] |
H. Wang, R. Xu, Y. Jin, R. Zhang, Catal. Today 327 (2019) 295-307. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.035 |
| [9] |
J. Kim, S.J. Cho, D.H. Kim, ACS Catal. 7 (2017) 6070-6081. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b00697 |
| [10] |
D. Jo, T. Ryu, G.T. Park, et al., ACS Catal. 6 (2016) 2443-2447. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b00489 |
| [11] |
S. Zhang, S. Ming, L. Guo, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 414 (2021) 125543-125554. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125543 |
| [12] |
J.D. Albarracin-Caballero, I. Khurana, J.R. Di Iorio, et al., React. Chem. Eng. 2 (2017) 168-179. DOI:10.1039/C6RE00198J |
| [13] |
H. Xu, Q. Wu, Y. Chu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 8705-8711. DOI:10.1039/c8ta01734d |
| [14] |
Y. Shan, X. Shi, J. Du, Y. Yu, H. He, Catal. Sci. Technol. 9 (2019) 106-115. DOI:10.1039/c8cy01933a |
| [15] |
G.S. Lee, S.I. Zones, J. Solid State Chem. 167 (2002) 289-298. DOI:10.1016/S0022-4596(02)99549-6 |
| [16] |
J.E. Schmidt, M.A. Deimund, D. Xie, M.E. Davis, Chem. Mater. 27 (2015) 3756-3762. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01003 |
| [17] |
H. Xu, W. Chen, Q. Wu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 4420-4425. DOI:10.1039/c9ta00174c |
| [18] |
L. Ren, L. Zhu, C. Yang, et al., Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 9789-9791. DOI:10.1039/c1cc12469b |
| [19] |
L. Ren, Y. Zhang, S. Zeng, et al., Chin. J. Catal. 33 (2012) 92-105. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(10)60280-X |
| [20] |
R. Martínez-Franco, M. Moliner, J.R. Thogersen, A. Corma, ChemCatChem 5 (2013) 3316-3323. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201300141 |
| [21] |
R. Martínez-Franco, M. Moliner, C. Franch, A. Kustov, A. Corma, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 127 (2012) 273-280. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.034 |
| [22] |
N. Martin, C.R. Boruntea, M. Moliner, A. Corma, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 11030-11033. DOI:10.1039/C5CC03200H |
| [23] |
B. Chen, R. Xu, R. Zhang, N. Liu, Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014) 13909-13916. DOI:10.1021/es503707c |
| [24] |
J. Liang, Y. Mi, G. Song, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 398 (2020) 122986-122997. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122986 |
| [25] |
Y. Ma, S. Cheng, L. Cao, et al., Appl. Catal. A Gen. 602 (2020) 117650-117661. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117650 |
| [26] |
Y.J. Kim, J.K. Lee, K.M. Min, et al., J. Catal. 311 (2014) 447-457. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.12.012 |
| [27] |
Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Peng, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 124 (2020) 28061-28073. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07971 |
| [28] |
Z. Chen, C. Fan, L. Pang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 237 (2018) 116-127. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.075 |
| [29] |
Z. Zhao, R. Yu, R. Zhao, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 217 (2017) 421-428. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.013 |
| [30] |
W. Su, Z. Li, Y. Peng, J. Li, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 29142-29149. DOI:10.1039/C5CP05128B |
| [31] |
H. Tian, Y. Ping, Y. Zhang, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 416 (2021) 126194-126203. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126194 |
| [32] |
J. Luo, F. Gao, K. Kamasamudram, et al., J. Catal. 348 (2017) 291-299. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.02.025 |
| [33] |
J. Luo, K. Kamasamudram, N. Currier, A. Yezerets, Eng. Sci. 190 (2018) 60-67. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2018.06.015 |
| [34] |
S. Han, J. Cheng, C. Zheng, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 419 (2017) 382-392. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.198 |
| [35] |
S. Han, Q. Ye, S. Cheng, T. Kang, H. Dai, Catal. Sci. Technol. 7 (2017) 703-717. DOI:10.1039/C6CY02555B |
| [36] |
N. Zhu, Y. Shan, W. Shan, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (2020) 15499-15506. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c06256 |
| [37] |
M.P. Ruggeri, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 166-167 (2015) 181-192. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.076 |
| [38] |
N. Zhu, Y. Shan, W. Shan, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (2021) 16175-16183. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.1c06475 |
| [39] |
J. Du, Y. Shan, Y. Sun, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 294 (2021) 120237-120246. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120237 |
2024, Vol. 35 

