Chinese Chemical Letters  2024, Vol. 35 Issue (1): 108757   PDF    
Solvent and guest-binding-controlled chiroptical inversion of molecular devices based on pseudo[1]catenane-type pillar[5]arene derivatives
Yongjun Lva,b,*, Chao Xiaob,c, Jingyu Mab, Dayang Zhoud, Wanhua Wub, Cheng Yangb,*     
a College of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong 643000, China;
b College of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China;
c Zhejiang NHU Pharmeceutical Co., Ltd., Shaoxing 312000, China;
d Comprehensive Analysis Center, ISIR, Osaka University, Osaka 567-0047, Japan
Abstract: Four pillar[5]arene-based bicyclic compounds, so-called molecular universal joint (MUJ), were synthesized by incorporating a bisamide ring containing N, O, or S-heteroatom groups, which served as stimuli-responsive chiroptical molecular devices. The structure of MUJ was confirmed by 1H NMR spectra and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, and their planar-chiral enantiomers were successfully separated. Chiroptical inversion behaviors from in to out configurations triggered by temperature, solvent, and guest complexation were investigated by circular dichroism spectra. Chiroptical inversion could be realized in the presence of adiponitrile in certain solvents due to the solvation effects on the side ring and the threading of the guest into the pillar[5]arene cavity. However, the stronger self-included interactions between the cavity and the inside ring of certain MUJs led to inhibition of the switching.
Keywords: Pillar[5]arene    N,O,S-containg ring    Bicycles    Solvation    Chirality inversion    

Induced chiroptical inversion of macrocyclic arenes has garnered considerable attention due to the significant role of chirality in supramolecular assemblies, artificial nanostructures, molecular machines/devices and bio-functional systems [13]. To achieve control over chiroptical inversion in a single macrocyclic arene, various external stimuli, such as temperature [4,5], solvent [6,7], light [810], pH [11,12], redox [13,14], and competitive guests [1519], have been explored. Among the reported chiral devices, planar chirality-based chiroptical inversions are particular attractive [2023]. Pillararenes, a class of macrocyclic arenes known for their facile synthesis, ease of modification, and versatile host-guest complexation, have garnered considerable interest [2431]. Pillar[5]arene-based pseudo[1]catenane-type compounds have emerged as an ideal platform for chiral molecular devices, achieved by fusing a side ring onto one hydroquinone unit, which we term as a molecular universal joint (MUJ) due to its rotational mobility [3235]. We have studied supramolecular behavior of various macrocyclic compounds [36] and revealed a series of chiroptical inversion behaviors of MUJs manipulated by temperature [37], pressure [38], solvent [39], redox [40], and cation [19]. Notably, the nature of the fused side rings could critically influence the chiroptical inversion properties. To further elucidate the control effect on the side rings in the inversion events, we designed and synthesized four new pseudo[1]catenane-type pillar[5]arene derivatives by incorporating an N, O, or S-atom in the side ring, which could yield a pair of enantiomers with the fused ring being able to roll in or out of the pillar[5]arene cavity.

The synthesis of pillar[5]arene-based MUJs, namely MUJ1, MUJ2, MUJ3 and MUJ4 (Scheme 1), was carried out using pillar[5]arene-dicarboxylic acid (P5–2A) [41] and corresponding diamine in CHCl3, resulting in yields of 43%, 60%, 47% and 49%, respectively [42]. P5–2A has been previously reported to exhibit a high affinity towards alkyldiamine guests [43]. The resultant host-guest complexes are stabilized by robust electrostatic interactions between dicarboxylic units and diamino groups, as well as multiple host-guest interactions between the cavity and the linear alkyl chain.

Download:
Scheme 1. Chemical structures of MUJ1, MUJ2, MUJ3, and MUJ4, guest G1 and cartoon representation.

The host-guest complexations between P5–2A and different diamines, including 1,8-diaminooctane, diethylenetriamine, 1,8-diamino-3,6-dioxaoctane and cystamine, were firstly examined by 1H NMR spectra (Figs. S1-S4 in Supporting information). In all cases, proton signals of diamines exhibited broadening with significant upfield shifts, indicating the diamine chain was included in the cavity of pillar[5]arene and suffered a strong shielding effect and led to a slow binding-release exchange on the NMR time scale, which unambiguously demonstrated the formation of a threaded complex between diamine chain and pillar[5]arene [44]. Moreover, MALDI-TOF-MS studies were carried out and confirmed a 1:1 stoichiometry of the host-guest complex (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). These results account for the synthesis process of desired compounds with host-guest intermediates.

MUJs were fully characterized by 1H, 13C NMR, and HR-MS spectra (Figs. S6 and S17 in Supporting information). Impressively, the proton signals of the side ring appeared significantly upfield because of the strong shielding effect of pillar[5]arene cavity in 1H NMR. Moreover, peaks of methylene protons neighboring amide group split into two sets due to the side ring's blocked rolling, which results in different shielding effects on the two protons [45].

To further study their synthesis and inclusion properties, 1H NMR experiments were carried out with relevant compounds in CDCl3 (Fig. 1). Taking MUJ3 for an example, the diamine first threaded into the cavity of P5–2A and formed [2]pseudorotaxane structure. As shown in Figs. 1a and b, all of the proton signals of diamine shifted upfield (Δδ = 0.70 ppm for Ha, 0.78 ppm for Hb, 0.47 ppm for Hc, respectively) due to the shielding effects inside the electron-rich cavity of pillar[5]arene unit. The rotation of the diamine ring would be limited robustly through the amidation reaction. As a result, the signals of Ha, Hb, and Hc differed and split into two parts in Fig. 1c. Meanwhile, proton signals Ha and Hb exhibited upfield shifts (Δδ = 2.74 ppm for Ha and 0.79 ppm for Hb, respectively), while Hc displayed a downfield shift (Δδ = 0.05 ppm) due to the deshielding effect from 5 neighbor oxygen atoms. When G1 was added to the solution of MUJ3, its proton (H1 and H2) signals shifted upfield by 2.65 and 3.29 ppm, respectively (Figs. 1d and e), indicating the encapsulation process between MUJ3 and G1. Namely, the inside ring rolled out from the pillar[5]arene cavity.

Download:
Fig. 1. 1H NMR spectral (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ℃) of (a) diamine (0.08 mmol/L), (b) P5–2A (0.02 mmol/L) + diamine (0.04 mmol/L), (c) MUJ3 (0.02 mmol/L), (d) MUJ3 (0.02 mmol/L) + G1 (10 µL, 4.00 equiv.), (d) G1 (0.08 mmol/L).

Moreover, 2D NOESY NMR correlations, using MUJ2 as an example, obviously revealed NOE signals between protons of NH (−2.93 ppm), H1,1 (2.37 and 1.90 ppm) and H2,2 (−0.07 and −0.19 ppm) on the side ring and pillar[5]arene aromatic protons HAr (7.0 ppm) in Fig. 2. Similar 1H NMR phenomena and NOE correlations were also observed for other three MUJs (Figs. S18-S20 in Supporting information). These spectral results supported that the self-entrapped conformations dominated under the experimental conditions.

Download:
Fig. 2. 1H-1H NOESY NMR spectrum (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ℃) of MUJ2.

The self-included structures of MUJ1, MUJ2 and MUJ3 were unambiguously established by X-ray crystallographic analyses (Fig. 3). In their crystal structures (CCDC No. 1856794, 2034235, and 2080798), it was evident that those side rings, consisting of alkyl, NH-containing, or O-containing chains, respectively, resided within the pillar[5]arene's cavity. Hydrogen bonds formed between the amide NH groups and two oxygen atoms on the modified phenyl unit should contribute greatly to the formation of the self-threaded structure (Figs. S21-S23 in Supporting information). Moreover, the fused side ring was also stabilized within the pillar[5]arene cavity through multiple CH/π interactions, which was proved to be existed in other aromatic hydrocarbons [46]. Previous reports have indicated that the length of the C4-containing alkyl chain could be well-suited to the pillar[5]arene cavity, and therefore, MUJ2 was expected to have structural stability and rigidity [47]. On the other hand, the other three MUJs may exhibit relatively weakened stability but strong flexibility, offering the potential for manipulating chiroptical inversion.

Download:
Fig. 3. Single crystal structure of (a) MUJ1, (b) MUJ2, and (c) MUJ3. Partial hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity, oxygens are red, and nitrogens are blue. Orange, red, and green dashed lines indicate NH/O, NH/π, and CH/π interactions, respectively.

To study the rolling in/out properties of the side rings on the MUJs, 1H NMR titration experiments were conducted in CDCl3 upon the addition of an excess amount of competitor 1,4-dicyanobutane (G1), known for its strong binding affinity towards pillar[5]arene derivatives [48]. Upon the addition of G1 to MUJ1, MUJ3, and MUJ4, partial proton signals of G1 shifted upfield at −0.20 and −1.45 ppm, demonstrating a shielding effect of the pillar[5]arene cavity due to the encapsulation of G1 (Figs. S24-S26 in Supporting information). In contrast, MUJ2 showed only slight 1H NMR spectral changes under similar conditions, presumably due to its more stable self-inclusion structure (Fig. S27 in Supporting information). This implies that G1 was not able to effectively push the NH-containing inside ring out of the cavity due to the fitted length of the side ring and the structural rigidity of MUJ2. These titration results are consistent with the conclusions drawn from single crystal analysis.

All above NMR spectral findings encouraged us to resolve MUJs racemic mixtures for investigating the possible chiroptical inversion behavior. Enantiomer pairs of MUJs were successfully separated with chiral HPLC using appropriate mobile phases, and each MUJ gave two fractions labeled as f1 and f2, respectively, corresponding a pair of enantiomers of MUJs (Fig. S28 in Supporting information). Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of MUJs' f1 displayed a positive Cotton effect at λext = 310 nm except for MUJ2, which exhibited a negative effect, while the CD spectra of f2 showed a mirror-image Cotton effect. Based on our previous report, we can conclude that the fraction with the positive Cotton effect corresponds to the in-pR configuration, while the counter-fraction corresponds to the in-pS configuration [32]. Furthermore, the supramolecular circular polarized luminescent (CPL) [49] response behavior of MUJs was studied in the absence and presence of G1 (Fig. 4). For example, two fractions of MUJ3 displayed mirror-imaged CPL emissions, giving positive CPL for MUJ3-f1 and negative CPL for MUJ3-f2 peaked ca. 320 nm. Upon the addition of G1, CPL signals weakened significantly as a result of the formation of the complex of G1⊂MUJ3, showing an efficient manipulation of CPL by supramolecular complexation.

Download:
Fig. 4. CPL spectra of two fractions of MUJ3 (0.01 mmol/L) with G1 in acetonitrile at 25 ℃.

Next, we focused on investigating the chiroptical inversion behaviors of the f1 of MUJs in response to solvent, temperature, and guest effects. The CD extremum (CDex) of MUJ1-f1 and MUJ3-f1 showed no significant changes in the selected solvents (Fig. S29 in Supporting information), suggesting no solvent-dependent chiroptical switching. Subsequently, the effects of temperature were examined by varying the temperature from 5 ℃ to 60 ℃ in CHCl3 and CH3OH (Fig. S30 in Supporting information). For all MUJs, temperature variation only caused a slight decrease in CDex without inducing chiroptical inversion.

To perform guest-triggered chiroptical inversion, titration experiments of enantiomer f1 upon the addition of G1 were carried out by monitoring CD spectral changes in CHCl3 or in CH3OH. When G1 was gradually added, MUJ1-f1 and MUJ4-f1 displayed significant decreases but without chiroptical inversion in CHCl3 (Figs. S31a and d in Supporting information), which suggested only partial side ring rolling out of the cavity. Interestingly, MUJ3-f1 underwent a positive-to-negative transformation (Fig. 5a), indicating an inversion of chirality from in-pR to out-pS. In contrast, MUJ2-f1 showed no negative CDex changes due to its robust self-included structure (Fig. S31b in Supporting information).

Download:
Fig. 5. CD spectral changes of MUJs (0.02 mmol/L, 25 ℃) upon addition of G1 in CHCl3: (a) MUJ3-f1, (b) MUJ4-f1 and in CH3OH: (c) MUJ3-f1, (d) MUJ4-f1. Inset: nonlinear fitting curves as a function of the concentration of G1 at 310 nm.

Alternatively, G1-triggered chiral inversions were tested in CH3OH (Figs. 5c and d, Fig. S32 in Suppporting information). Upon addition of G1, the positive CD Cotton effect was gradually reduced and inverted to negative ones for MUJ1-f1, MUJ3-f1, and MUJ4-f1 except for MUJ2-f1 which demonstrated a medium reduction due to only partial inversion. In the case of the CD titration of MUJ2-f1, the solvation of the NH-containing side ring by CH3OH molecules might account for distinctive spectral changes in CHCl3 and in CH3OH. In comparison with a robust conformation of methoxy–pill[5]arene self-locked structures reported by Liu and co-workers [42], MUJ1 displayed de-threaded inversion in CH3OH, which might be attributed to the hydrogen bonding and solvation effect between the amide side ring and CH3OH solvent. As shown in Fig. 6, such G1-driven planar chirality inversions from in-form to out-form were observed in both two solutions. The f1 fractions for MUJ3 in CHCl3, MUJ1 and MUJ4 in CH3OH presented a change of dissymmetric factor g (g = Δε/ε, where ε is the molar extinction coefficient at a particular wavelength) from positive to negative. These results suggest that solvation plays a dominant role in controlling G1-driven chiroptical inversion of the bicyclic pillar[5]arene-type compounds.

Download:
Fig. 6. Extremum changes of the anisotropy factor (g) of MUJ-f1 enantiomers (0.02 mmol/L, 25 ℃) before and after the addition of G1 at 310 nm in CHCl3 and in CH3OH.

Based on CD spectral changes, association constants (K) of MUJs with G1 were calculated by a nonlinear curve fitting method, as shown in the insets of Figs. S31 and S32 (Supporting information). The K and corresponding Gibbs free energy change ΔG data were listed in Table 1. Compared with other reported pillar[5]arene analogs [20], MUJs showed extremely lower affinities towards G1. This could be attributed to the rotational and motional freedom of both pillar[5]arene units and the side ring, which undermines the strength of G1. Moreover, it was found that MUJs exhibited higher affinities towards G1 in CH3OH than in CHCl3. This could be due to the availability of the pillar[5]arene cavity for accommodating G1 or CH3OH molecules and the easy solvation on the side ring by CH3OH through additional hydrogen bonds between N, O, or S-heteroatomic groups and solvent molecules. Meanwhile, G1 was captured in the cavity by multiple CH/π, CH/O, and CH/N interactions. To accomplish the chirality inversion, the inside ring must be expelled from the cavity, facilitated by the insertion of G1 and solvation of the inside-out ring (Fig. 7). Besides, G1-driven handedness switching was observed for MUJ3-f1 in both solvents along with the largest association constants. This could be attributed to the higher solvation of ethylene glycol side chains relative to other side rings, which furthermore promotes the chiral inversion and stabilization of the out-conformational host-guest complex.

Table 1
Association constants for 1:1 complexation of enantiomer f1 with G1 determined by CD titrations at 25 ℃.

Download:
Fig. 7. Cartoon representation for chirality inversion of pseudo[1]catenanes.

In summary, we designed and synthesized four novel pseudo[1]catenane-type pillar[5]arene-based MUJs fusing by a N, O, or S-containing sider ring, whose self-inclusion structures were confirmed by NMR spectra and single crystal analyses. It was found that G1 could thread into the cavity of MUJ1, MUJ3, and MUJ4, except MUJ2, which exhibited strong structural stability and rigidity. No G1-triggered chirality switching of MUJ2-f1 was observed in CHCl3 and in CH3OH, whereas MUJ3-f1 bearing one oxyethylene unit exhibited significant chiroptical inversion along with positive-to-negative CD spectra changes. The self-included interactions and the solvation on the side ring played important roles in controlling the chiroptical inversion of the pillar[5]arene moiety. Further work will focus on exploring chiroptical inversion driven by other stimuli, such as metal ions, acids/bases, and reductants/oxidants of disulfide bonds. These findings provide valuable insights into the dynamic behavior of pillar[5]arene derivatives and their potential applications in supramolecular chemistry and molecular machines.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of this work by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 92056116, 21871194, 21971169), National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFA0505903).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108757.

References
[1]
L. Zhang, L. Qin, X. Wang, H. Cao, M. Liu, Adv. Mater. 26 (2015) 6959-6964.
[2]
S. Sun, Y. Yang, D. Li, J. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 19524-19528. DOI:10.1021/jacs.9b08737
[3]
L. Yao, K. Fu, X. Wang, et al., ACS. Nano 17 (2023) 2159-2169. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.2c08315
[4]
P. Xing, Y. Li, Y. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 7774-7779. DOI:10.1002/anie.201802825
[5]
C. Shi, H. Li, X. Shi, L. Zhao, H. Qiu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 3613-3622. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.010
[6]
F. Mamiya, N. Ousaka, E. Yashima, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 14442-14446. DOI:10.1002/anie.201507918
[7]
Y. Nagata, T. Yamada, T. Adachi, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 10104-10113. DOI:10.1021/ja403391m
[8]
H.K. Bisoyi, Q. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 2994-3010. DOI:10.1002/anie.201505520
[9]
J. Kim, J. Lee, W.Y. Kim, et al., Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 6959-6964. DOI:10.1038/ncomms7959
[10]
M. Liu, L. Zhang, T. Wang, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 7304-7397. DOI:10.1021/cr500671p
[11]
H. Liang, B. Hua, F. Xu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 19772-19778. DOI:10.1021/jacs.0c10570
[12]
R. Lin, H. Zhang, S. Li, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 17 (2011) 2420-2427. DOI:10.1002/chem.201001867
[13]
J. Gregolinski, M. Hikita, T. Sakamoto, et al., Inorg. Chem. 55 (2016) 633-643. DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01902
[14]
E. Ohta, H. Sato, S. Ando, et al., Nat. Chem. 3 (2011) 68-73. DOI:10.1038/nchem.900
[15]
J. Suk, V.R. Naidu, X. Liu, M.S. Lah, K.S. Jeong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 13938-13941. DOI:10.1021/ja206546b
[16]
T. Ogoshi, D. Yamafuji, T. Akutsu, M. Naito, T.A. Yamagishi, Chem. Commun. 49 (2013) 8782-8784. DOI:10.1039/c3cc44672g
[17]
E. Lee, H. Ju, I.H. Park, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 9669-9677. DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b05751
[18]
K. Kato, S. Fa, S. Ohtani, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (2022) 3648-3687. DOI:10.1039/d2cs00169a
[19]
F. Gao, X. Yu, L. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107558-107561. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.072
[20]
T. Ogoshi, T. Yamagishi, Y. Nakamoto, Chem. Rev. 116 (2015) 7937-8002.
[21]
S. Fa, T. Kakuta, T. Yamagishi, T. Ogoshi, Chem. Let. 48 (2019) 1278-1287. DOI:10.1246/cl.190544
[22]
A. Imayoshi, B.V. Lakshmi, Y. Ueda, T. Yoshimura, T. Kawabata, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 404. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-20372-0
[23]
J. Ye, L. Li, Y. You, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 384-390. DOI:10.1021/jacsau.2c00630
[24]
H. Zhang, Z. Liu, F. Xin, Y. Zhao, Coord. Chem. Rev. 420 (2020) 213425-213433. DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213425
[25]
C. Yan, Z. Zhang, Y. Ding, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1267-1279. DOI:10.3390/en14051267
[26]
S. Yu, Y. Wang, S. Chatterjee, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett 32 (2021) 179-183. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.055
[27]
L. Wu, C. Han, X. Jing, Y. Yao, Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3322-3330. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.04.046
[28]
F. Lu, Y. Chen, B. Fu, S. Chen, L. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 5111-5115. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.03.103
[29]
C. Liu, L. Zhou, S. Guo, H. Zhang, J. Han, Polym. Chem. 13 (2022) 286-299. DOI:10.1039/d1py01397a
[30]
K. Wang, X. Tian, J.H. Jordan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 89-96. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.06.026
[31]
H. Qiang, T. Chen, Z. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 3225-3229. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.020
[32]
J. Yao, W. Wu, W. Liang, Y. Feng, C. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 129 (2017) 6869-6873. DOI:10.1002/anie.201702542
[33]
S. Fa, K. Adachi, Y. Nagata, et al., Chem. Sci. 12 (2021) 3483-3488. DOI:10.1039/d1sc00074h
[34]
X. Yu, W. Wu, D. Zhou, et al., CCS Chem 4 (2022) 1806-1814. DOI:10.31635/ccschem.021.202101036
[35]
Y. Zhou, G. Zhuang, P. Du, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108593.
[36]
D. Zhang, W. Liang, J. Yi, et al., Sci. China Chem. 65 (2022) 1149-1156. DOI:10.1007/s11426-022-1233-x
[37]
J. Yao, W. Wu, C. Xiao, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 2600. DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-22880-z
[38]
J. Yao, H. Mizuno, C. Xiao, et al., Chem. Sci. 12 (2021) 4361-4366. DOI:10.1039/d0sc06988d
[39]
C. Fan, J. Yao, G. Li, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 12526-12537. DOI:10.1002/chem.201902676
[40]
C. Xiao, W. Wu, W. Liang, et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 8094-8098. DOI:10.1002/anie.201916285
[41]
Y. Lv, C. Xiao, C. Yang, New. J. Chem. 42 (2018) 19357-19359. DOI:10.1039/c8nj04802a
[42]
S.H. Li, H.Y. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Liu, Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 7590-7596. DOI:10.1038/ncomms8590
[43]
G. Yu, B. Hua, C. Han, Org. Lett. 16 (2014) 2486-2489. DOI:10.1021/ol500857w
[44]
N.L. Strutt, R.S. Forgan, J.M. Spruell, Y.Y. Botros, J.F. Stoddart, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 5668-5671. DOI:10.1021/ja111418j
[45]
L. Shao, Y. Pan, B. Hua, et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 11779-11783. DOI:10.1002/anie.202000338
[46]
G. Huang, W. Liu, A. Valkonen, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 91-94. DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2017.07.005
[47]
C. Li, Q. Xu, J. Li, F. Yao, X. Jia, Org. Biomol. Chem. 8 (2010) 1568-1576. DOI:10.1039/b920146g
[48]
X. Shu, S. Chen, J. Li, et al., Chem. Commun. 48 (2012) 2967-2969. DOI:10.1039/c2cc00153e
[49]
C. Tu, W. Wu, W. Liang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202203541. DOI:10.1002/anie.202203541