Chinese Chemical Letters  2022, Vol. 33 Issue (2): 817-820   PDF    
Iron-catalyzed cyanoalkylation of difluoroenol silyl ethers with cyclobutanone oxime esters
Xiaolei Zhua, Yangen Huanga, Xiuhua Xub,*, Fengling Qinga,b,*     
a College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China;
b Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai 200032, China
Abstract: An iron-catalyzed coupling reaction of difluoroenol silyl ethers and cyclobutanone oxime esters is described. This protocol provides a convenient access to various previously unknown and potentially useful gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles inmoderate to good yields. The transformations of resulting products to other fluorinecontaining products is also documented.
Keywords: Cyanoalkylation    Difluoroenol silyl ether    Cyclobutanone oxime ester    Iron catalysis    Radical reaction    

The introduction of a gem-difluoromethylene (CF2) unit into organic molecules often dramatically perturbs their physical, chemical and biological properties [1-3]. For instance, when the CF2 group was introduced adjacent to the carbonyl functionality, the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon atom is sharply increased. This causes not only changes in reactivity but in biological activity as well. It is well known that α,α-difluoroketones tend to exist in hydrated form and mimic closely the tetrahedral transition state, which has been applied in the development of enzyme inhibitors (Fig. 1.) [4,5]. Furthermore, α,α-difluoroketones are valuable building blocks for the preparation of various useful fluorine-containing compounds [6-9].

Download:
Fig. 1. Representative bioactive α, α-difluoroketones.

Over the past decades, promising strategies have been reported for the synthesis of α,α-difluoroketones, mainly including fluorination of ketones [10-14], oxidation of α,α-difluoroalcohols [15-19], and transformation of difluorocarbonyl synthons [20-24]. The fluorination methods have some drawbacks such as poor functional compatibility, whereas oxidation protocol always requires prefunctionalized substrates. In contrast, with the increasing accessibility of difluorocarbonyl synthons, considerable efforts have been devoted to their conversions to α,α-difluoroketones. Among the difluorocarbonyl synthons, difluoroenol silyl ethers have recently received much attentions due to their versatile reactivity [25,26]. They are easily prepared from trifluoromethylketones by Mg-mediated cleavage of one of the C−F bonds [27,28]. The standard reactions of difluoroenol silyl ethers involve nucleophilic addition to unsaturated substrates (Scheme 1a) [29-33] and substitution of electrophiles (Scheme 1b) [34-38]. In 2009, our group reported an unique copper-catalyzed oxidative coupling of difluoroenol silyl ethers with tertiary amines to access β-amino-α,α-difluoro ketones (Scheme 1c) [[39]]. Recently, the reactions of difluoroenol silyl ethers and different radical precursors, such as aryl diazonium salts, Katritzky salts, and alkyl carboxylic redox esters have been achieved under photoredox catalysis (Scheme 1d) [40-43]. Despite these elegant advances, the development of new reactions of difluoroenol silyl ethers is still highly demanding.

Download:
Scheme 1. Reactions with difluoroenol silyl ethers.

Alkylnitriles play an important role in organic and medicinal chemistry [44-46]. The preparation of alkylnitriles has attracted considerable attention [47-49]. Recent years have witnessed a renaissance of ring-opening of cyclobutanone oxime esters for the direct installation of diverse cyanoalkyl moieties into organic compounds under transition-metal [50-58] or photoredox [59-61] catalyzed conditions. Inspired by these achievements, herein we disclose an iron-catalyzed coupling of difluoroenol silyl ethers and cyclobutanone oxime esters to access novel gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles (Scheme 1e).

Initially, difluoroenol silyl ether 1a and cyclobutanone oxime ester 2a were chosen as the model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions (Table 1). To our delight, the common metal catalysts, such as Cu(OTf)2, Ni(OAc)2, and Fe(OTf)2, could promote this coupling reaction (entries 1–3). Among them, Fe(OTf)2 was optimal, affording the desired product 3aa in 74% yield. Then, other iron catalysts including Fe(acac)2, Fe(OAc)2, and Fe(OTf)3 were tested (entries 4–6). The yield of 3aa was improved to 89% with Fe(OAc)2 as the catalyst. However, further screening of the solvent (entries 7–10), reaction temperature (entries 11 and 12), and amount of catalyst (entries 13 and 14) failed to give better results.

Table 1
Optimization of reaction conditions.a

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we first examined the scope of cyclobutanone oxime esters (Scheme 2). A variety of cyclobutanone oxime esters 2a-2s reacted efficiently with 1a to provide the corresponding gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles 3aa-3as in moderate to good yields. 3-Substituted oxime esters bearing alkyl (2b), benzyl (2c), aryl (2d-2l), nitrile (2m) and ester (2n) participated in this reaction smoothly. The synthetically useful aryl halides (2g-2k) were well tolerated. It should be noted that the 3,3-disubstituted cyclobutanone oxime ester (2o, 2p) did not exhibit obvious steric effect. On the other hand, sterically hindered substrate 2q deliver the desired product 3aq in lower yield. Oxetan-3-one and thietan-3-one derived oxime esters 2r and 2s were also suitable substrates. Notably, this reaction could be easily scaled up to 1.0 mmol with a slight decrease in yield.

Download:
Scheme 2. Scope of cyclobutanone oxime esters. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), Fe(OAc)2 (0.02 mmol), DCE (2.0 mL), N2, 100 ℃, 12 h, isolated yields. a Reaction was performed in 1.0 mmol.

Next, the generality of difluoroenol silyl ethers was investigated. As shown in Scheme 3, aromatic difluoroenol silyl ethers (1b-1g) bearing both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups were smoothly converted to the cyanoalkylated products. Naphthyl difluoroenol silyl ether (1h) was found to be the suitable reactant. The cyanoalkylation of heteroaryl difluoroenol silyl ether (1i) was also successful, affording products 3ia and 3id in moderate yields, respectively. However, alkyl difluoroenol silyl ethers were not compatible with the reaction conditions. The structure of product 3dr was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis (for details, see Supporting information).

Download:
Scheme 3. Scope of difluoroenol silyl ethers. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), Fe(OAc)2 (0.02 mmol), DCE (2.0 mL), N2, 100 ℃, 12 h, isolated yields.

Subsequently, the derivatization of product 3aa was performed to probe the synthetic utility of this protocol (Scheme 4). Reduction of 3aa with NaBH4 in EtOH afforded the corresponding alcohol 4 in 85% yield. Furthermore, treatment of 3aa with K2CO3 and H2O2 in MeOH furnished the amide derivative 5 in 88% yield.

Download:
Scheme 4. Transformation of 3aa.

To gain insight into the reaction mechanism, a radical scavenger, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT), was added to the reaction mixture. The target product 3aa was not observed; instead, a cyanoalkyl−BHT adduct 6 was formed in 38% yield (Scheme 5a). This result indicated that a cyanoalkyl radical species was probably involved in this reaction. On the basis of this result and previous studies [40-43,50-58], a plausible mechanism was proposed for this iron-catalyzed reaction (Scheme 5b). First, single-electron transfer (SET) from Fe(Ⅱ) catalyst to cyclobutanone oxime esters 2 gives iminyl radical A and an Fe(Ⅲ) species. Then, iminyl radical A undergoes C−C bond cleavage via β-elimination, leading to γ-cyanoalkyl radical B, which is subsequently added to difluoroenol silyl ethers 1 to give β,β-difluoroalkyl radical C. This radical intermediate C would be oxidized by Fe(Ⅲ) species to the corresponding cation intermediate D. Finally, desilylation of intermediate D furnishes the desired products 3.

Download:
Scheme 5. Proposed reaction mechanism.

In summary, we have developed an iron-catalyzed coupling of readily available difluoroenol silyl ethers and cyclobutanone oxime esters to access novel gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles. This reaction proceeds under mild conditions with excellent functional group tolerance. Due to increasing importance of fluorine-containing compounds and synthetic utility of carbonyl and nitrile groups, this protocol might find applications in drug discovery and material science.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgments

National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21421002, 21991211), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB20000000) are greatly acknowledged for funding this work.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.030.

References
[1]
M.J. Tozer, T.F. Herpin, Tetrahedron 52 (1996) 8619-8683. DOI:10.1016/0040-4020(96)00311-0
[2]
D. O'Hagan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 (2008) 308-319. DOI:10.1039/B711844A
[3]
N.A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem. 61 (2018) 5822-5880. DOI:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01788
[4]
D.M. Quinn, G.H. Lin, US Patent (1992) 5093371.
[5]
C. Han, A.E. Salyer, E.H. Kim, et al., J. Med. Chem. 56 (2013) 2456-2465. DOI:10.1021/jm301805e
[6]
H.Y. Zhao, Z. Feng, Z. Luo, X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 10401-10405. DOI:10.1002/anie.201605380
[7]
S.I. Scherbinina, O.V. Fedorov, V.V. Levin, et al., J. Org. Chem. 82 (2017) 12967-12974. DOI:10.1021/acs.joc.7b02467
[8]
J.P. Phelan, S.B. Lang, J.S. Compton, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 8037-8047. DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b05243
[9]
R. Pluta, N. Kumagai, M. Shibasaki, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 2459-2463. DOI:10.1002/anie.201814607
[10]
H. Cho, X. Du, J.P. Rizzi, et al., Nature 539 (2016) 107-111. DOI:10.1038/nature19795
[11]
Y.L. Li, J. Li, J. Deng, Adv. Synth. Catal. 359 (2017) 1407-1412. DOI:10.1002/adsc.201601315
[12]
C.E. Iacono, T.C. Stephens, T.S. Rajan, G. Pattison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 2036-2040. DOI:10.1021/jacs.7b12941
[13]
W. Li, J. Zou, S. Zhu, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 10328-10332. DOI:10.1002/chem.201902834
[14]
Y. Zhang, J. Ge, L. Luo, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 7952-7957. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02873
[15]
M.H. Yang, J.R. Hunt, N. Sharifi, R.A. Altman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 9080-9083. DOI:10.1002/anie.201604149
[16]
R.A. Hazlitt, Q.L. Tran, M.F. Sowaileh, D.A. Colby, J. Org. Chem. 82 (2017) 2231-2236. DOI:10.1021/acs.joc.6b02863
[17]
L.S. Zheng, P. Phansavat, V. Ratovelomanana-Vidal, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 5107-5111. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01943
[18]
P.R. Mears, S. Hoekman, C.E. Rye, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 17 (2017) 1487-1505. DOI:10.1039/C6OB02618D
[19]
L. Santos, A. Panossian, M. Donnard, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 8741-8745. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03380
[20]
T. Zhang, J. Pan, J. Duan, et al., ChemCatChem 11 (2019) 5778-5782. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201901395
[21]
X.L. Lv, C. Wang, Q.L. Wang, W. Shu, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 56-59. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03485
[22]
C.H. Qu, G.T. Song, J. Xu, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 8169-8173. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02487
[23]
A. Reina, T. Krachko, K. Onida, et al., ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 2189-2197. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.9b05159
[24]
F. de Azambuja, M.H. Yang, T. Feoktistova, et al., Nat. Chem. 12 (2020) 489-496. DOI:10.1038/s41557-020-0428-1
[25]
M. Decostanzi, J.M. Campagne, E. Leclerc, Org. Biomol. Chem. 13 (2015) 7351-7380. DOI:10.1039/C5OB00855G
[26]
X.S. Hu, J.S. Yu, J. Zhou, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 13638-13648. DOI:10.1039/C9CC07677H
[27]
H. Amii, T. Kobayashi, Y. Hatamoto, K. Uneyama, Chem. Commun. (1999) 1323-1324.
[28]
G.K.S. Prakash, J. Hu, G.A. Olah, J. Fluorine Chem. 112 (2001) 357-362. DOI:10.1016/S0022-1139(01)00535-8
[29]
J.S. Yu, F.M. Liao, W.M. Gao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 7381-7385. DOI:10.1002/anie.201501747
[30]
A. Honraedt, A.V.D. Lee, J.M. Campagne, E. Leclerc, Adv. Synth. Catal. 359 (2017) 2815-2823. DOI:10.1002/adsc.201700371
[31]
J.S. Li, Y.J. Liu, G.W. Zhang, J.A. Ma, Org. Lett. 19 (2017) 6364-6367. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03213
[32]
X.S. Hu, P.G. Ding, J.S. Yu, J. Zhou, Org. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 2500-2505. DOI:10.1039/C9QO00577C
[33]
X.S. Hu, J.X. He, S.Z. Dong, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 5500. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-19387-4
[34]
X. Huang, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 5956-5961. DOI:10.1002/anie.201900745
[35]
X. Gao, R. Cheng, Y.L. Xiao, X.L. Wan, X. Zhang, Chem. Commun. 5 (2019) 2987-2999.
[36]
J. Li, Y. Chen, R. Zhong, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 1164-1168. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00018
[37]
Y.J. Hao, Y. Gong, Y. Zhou, J. Zhou, J.S. Yu, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 8516-8521. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03123
[38]
J. Li, W. Xi, R. Zhong, et al., Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 1050-1053. DOI:10.1039/D0CC06980A
[39]
L. Chu, X. Zhang, F.L. Qing, Org. Lett. 11 (2009) 2197-2200. DOI:10.1021/ol900541n
[40]
Y.B. Wu, G.P. Lu, B.J. Zhou, et al., Chem. Commun. 52 (2016) 5965-5968. DOI:10.1039/C6CC00177G
[41]
F.S. He, Y. Yao, W. Xie, J. Wu, Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 9469-9472. DOI:10.1039/D0CC03591B
[42]
Y. Huang, J. Jia, Q.P. Huang, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 14247-14250. DOI:10.1039/D0CC05725H
[43]
H. Song, R. Cheng, Q.Q. Min, X. Zhang, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 7747-7750. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02997
[44]
F.F. Fleming, Q. Wang, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 2035-2077. DOI:10.1021/cr020045d
[45]
F.F. Fleming, L. Yao, P.C. Ravikumar, L. Funk, B.C. Shook, J. Med. Chem. 53 (2010) 7902-7917. DOI:10.1021/jm100762r
[46]
M.X. Wang, Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (2015) 602-611. DOI:10.1021/ar500406s
[47]
J. Kim, H.J. Kim, S. Chang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 11948-11959. DOI:10.1002/anie.201206168
[48]
R. López, C. Palomo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 13170-13184. DOI:10.1002/anie.201502493
[49]
F. Xiao, Y. Guo, Y.F. Zeng, Adv. Synth. Catal. 363 (2021) 120-143. DOI:10.1002/adsc.202001093
[50]
Z. Chen, Q. Zhou, Q.L. Wang, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 362 (2020) 3004-3010. DOI:10.1002/adsc.202000369
[51]
J. Zhang, M. Yang, J.B. Liu, F.S. He, J. Wu, Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 3225-3228. DOI:10.1039/D0CC00375A
[52]
B. Zhao, Y. Wu, Y. Yuan, Z. Shi, Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 4676-4679. DOI:10.1039/D0CC00988A
[53]
X.Y. Lu, C.C. Liu, R.C. Jiang, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 14191-14194. DOI:10.1039/D0CC06517J
[54]
C.K. Ran, H. Huang, X.H. Li, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 38 (2020) 69-76. DOI:10.1002/cjoc.201900384
[55]
Y. Deng, C. Zhao, Y. Zhou, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 3524-3530. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00963
[56]
D. Yang, H. Huang, M.H. Li, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 4333-4338. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01365
[57]
J. Lou, J. Ma, B.H. Xu, Y.G. Zhou, Z. Yu, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 5202-5206. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01645
[58]
M. Li, C.T. Wang, Q.F. Bao, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 751-756. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03973
[59]
Y. Liu, Q.L. Wang, Z. Chen, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 3011-3014. DOI:10.1039/C9CC10057A
[60]
M.M. Zhang, S.H. Li, J.L. Tu, Q.Q. Min, F. Liu, Org. Chem. Front. 7 (2020) 622-627. DOI:10.1039/C9QO01446B
[61]
X.Y. Yu, J. Chen, H.W. Chen, W.J. Xiao, J.R. Chen, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 2333-2338. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00532