Chinese Chemical Letters  2022, Vol. 33 Issue (2): 812-816   PDF    
Enhanced photocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation with wide-spectrum utilization over black TiO2 supported catalyst
Binbin Jina, Xin Yea, Heng Zhonga,b,c, Fangming Jina,b,c,*, Yun Hang Hud,*     
a School of Environmental Science and Engineering, State Key Lab of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
b Center of Hydrogen Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
c Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China;
d Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931-1295, United States
Abstract: Light-driven conversion of CO2 into chemicals/fuels is a desirable approach for achieving carbon neutrality using clean and sustainable energy. However, its scale-up application is restricted due to insufficient efficiency. Herein, we present a photothermal catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 into CH4 over Ru/black TiO2 catalysts, aiming to achieve the synergistic use of light and heat in solar energy during CO2 conversion. Owing to the desirable spectral response ability and photothermal conversion performance of black TiO2, an efficient combination of photocatalysis and thermocatalysis has been established. The CO2 hydrogenation was significantly accelerated because of the increased catalyst surface temperature enabled by the photothermal effect of black TiO2. Simultaneously, through the in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) observation, electron-rich Ru nanoparticles was achieved based on the photo-induced excitation, thereby providing more negative hydride to improve nucleophilic attack to the CO2, obtaining the CH4 yield of 93.8%.
Keywords: Photothermal    Black TiO2    CO2    Electron-rich    Hydrogenation    

To alleviate the climate change caused by carbon cycle imbalance and reduce the dependence on fossil fuels, conversion of CO2 into value added chemicals and fuels is one promising choice [1-4]. Considering that solar energy is clean and inexhaustible to a certain extent, photocatalysis is thought to play a crucial role in the future industry system and has been widely investigated [5,6]. Thus, photocatalytic CO2 conversion is a desirable approach for CO2 utilization. However, insufficient efficiency limits the application of photocatalytic CO2 conversion in large-scale industrial production. Although various strategies have been applied to improve the photocatalytic performance, the efficient CO2 conversion is still a vital challenge.

Photothermal catalysis, which has the potential to utilize the whole solar spectrum, is one desirable choice for this issue [7,8]. During the photothermal catalysis, while the short-wavelength light could be converted into photogenerated electron-hole pairs to drive the photochemical reactions, the long-wavelength light could be converted into heat, accelerating the reaction, especially for the surface endothermic reaction [9,10]. Considering the high efficiency of thermochemical method, the combination of photocatalysis and thermocatalysis could strike a balance between energy consumption and conversion efficiency, which has a broad application prospect in CO2 methanation [11-15].

To achieve desirable synergy between photochemical and thermochemical, the construction design of catalyst is crucial. TiO2 has been widely applied in photocatalysis [16,17]. However, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 is greatly limited due to its poor response ability to visible light [18,19]. To solve this issue, Chen et al. prepared TiO2-x (black TiO2) from TiO2 by strong reduction treatment, and black TiO2 exhibits excellent spectral response range and photocatalytic activity [20,21]. Thus, black TiO2 has attracted increasing attention and been widely applied in photocatalysis such as photocatalytic water splitting. Additionally, because of its inherent black color, black TiO2 could perform high photothermal conversion ability. Considering the broad spectral response range and excellent photothermal conversion efficiency of black TiO2 [22-25], it is reasonable to speculate that black TiO2 could balance the photoelectric conversion and photothermal conversion during the photothermal catalytic CO2 conversion, giving promising catalytic activity. Therefore, in the present work, supported black TiO2 was synthesized for light-driven catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to CH4 using ruthenium as the active metal, and the synergic mechanism between photocatalysis and thermocatalysis in the CO2 conversion was investigated.

Firstly, as shown in Table 1, no CH4 was detected in all entries without irradiation. Considering the high thermodynamic stability of CO2, it is difficult to drive the hydrogenation of CO2 without additional energy input at low temperature. Subsequently, the introduction of irradiation brought significant increase in CH4 yield (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). Most importantly, the CH4 yield achieved over 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 under irradiation was 40.1%, which was 2 times higher than that achieved over 2 wt% Ru/TiO2. Additionally, small amount of CO was also produced in entries 3 and 4. CO species are commonly considered as the important intermediate during the CO2 hydrogenation. Additionally, we performed the experiments without CO2 and no carbon containing products were detected, indicating that the injected CO2 is the sole carbon source. There are two possible reasons for the remarkable improvement of the catalytic activity of Ru/black TiO2: (1) The enhancement of CO2 adsorption capacity; (2) the improvement of spectral response capacity and photothermal conversion efficiency. In order to verify the above conjectures, the CO2 adsorption capacity and spectral response ability of the catalysts were investigated, and the photothermal conversion performances of the catalysts were evaluated.

Table 1
The CH4 yield from catalytic conversion of CO2 over different catalysts (reaction conditions: 0.4 MPa mixture gas-N2: H2: CO2 = 4:5:1, 20 mg catalyst, 1 h).

Firstly, the light response characteristics of the prepared materials were investigated and Fig. 1a shows the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of TiO2 and black TiO2. The spectral response ability of black TiO2 in long wavelength range is much higher than that of TiO2. It is possible that, after the hydrogenation at high temperature, the intrinsic symmetry of TiO2 crystal was broken, forming an amorphous shell on the TiO2 surface [26,27]. Thus, a secondary narrow bandgap would be introduced into TiO2, enhancing the light absorption. Additionally, considering the more significant thermal effect of long wavelength light, the enhanced long wavelength light response ability of black TiO2 can make black TiO2 perform better photothermal conversion efficiency under the broad wavelength irradiation. Subsequently, the CO2 adsorption observation was conducted. As shown in Fig. S1 (Supporting information), the CO2 adsorption amount of both TiO2 and black TiO2 increased with the increase of pressure and the CO2 adsorption ability of black TiO2 was better than that of TiO2. The enhanced CO2 adsorption ability of black TiO2 gives the prepared catalysts better catalytic activity. Furthermore, nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of TiO2 and black TiO2 were compared. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface areas of TiO2 and black TiO2 are 99.8 m2/g and 100.1 m2/g, respectively (Figs. S2a and b in Supporting information). The hydrogenation treatment has not brought significant change of specific surface area to black TiO2. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that the enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity can be attributed to the formation of oxygen vacancy in black TiO2 [28,29].

Download:
Fig. 1. (a) UV-vis DRS of TiO2 and black TiO2. (b) XRD patterns of TiO2, black TiO2, 2 wt% Ru/TiO2 and 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2. (c) EPR spectra of TiO2 and black TiO2. (d, e) HRTEM images of 2 wt% Ru/TiO2 and 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2.

Then, the textural properties were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). As shown in Fig. 1b, the XRD patterns of the catalysts displayed no obvious differences in crystal form compared to the original TiO2. However, it is worth noting that the peak intensity of black TiO2 is significantly lower than that of TiO2 and the (101) plane characteristic peak of black TiO2 shifts to larger diffraction angle, which can be owing to the decrease of the intrinsic material crystallinity and formation of lattice defects [30]. Subsequently, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis was applied to investigate the 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 (Figs. S3 and S4 in Supporting information). In the XPS diagram of O 1s (Fig. S4), it can be seen that the O 1s can be divided into two peaks, among which the peak at 529.52 eV is attributed to the lattice oxygen (OL), while the peak at 530.73 eV can be attributed to the oxygen vacancy (OV) in black TiO2 [31,32]. During the high temperature reduction of TiO2, part of the oxygen atoms were deprived, causing the decrease of the electron cloud density and thereby increasing the binding energy of O 1s. Additionally, the existence of oxygen vacancies was proved by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements. As shown in Fig. 1c, a strong EPR signal (centering at g = 2.003) can be observed in black TiO2 EPR spectra while TiO2 only exhibits an extremely weak EPR signal [33]. It indicates that lots of oxygen vacancies were produced in black TiO2, which accords with the XPS analysis results.

To further investigate the morphology and structure of the catalysts, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) were conducted. The measured average particle sizes of TiO2 and black TiO2 are 22.5 ± 3.0 nm and 28.1 ± 4.7 nm, respectively (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). The agglomeration of the catalysts after calcination at high temperature is one possible reason for the increase of average particle size. Additionally, as shown in Figs. 1d and e, Ru nanoparticles in the 2 wt% Ru/TiO2 and 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 catalysts are loaded on the support surface in the form of small particle and the contact interface between Ru and support can be clearly observed. The lattice fringes belonged to the Ru (002) crystal facet are clearly observed [34]. Owing to the well-contacted interface, efficient photogenerated carriers transferring can be constructed during the reaction. In addition, the lattice fringes of TiO2 in 2 wt% Ru/TiO2 catalyst are orderly arranged, and the lattice spacing is 0.355 nm, belonging to (101) crystal facet of anatase TiO2 [35]. However, it is difficult to observe continuous lattice fringes in 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2. The removal of O during reduction treatment broke the stoichiometric balance of TiO2, forming amorphous phase [20,36]. This result also agrees with the XRD analysis result that the crystallinity of black TiO2 has been weakened structurally.

As aforementioned that the increase of catalytic activity of Ru/black TiO2 can also be attributed to the enhanced photothermal conversion ability, therefore, the photothermal conversion performances of Ru/TiO2 and Ru/black TiO2 were compared. Firstly, surface temperatures of the prepared catalysts under irradiation were directly observed based on IR temperature measuring device. As shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information), the rising rate of the surface temperature of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 was significantly higher than that of 2 wt% Ru/TiO2 under irradiation. After 300 s, the surface temperature of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 reached 283.7 ℃, while the temperature of 2 wt% Ru/TiO2 was only 223.1 ℃. It can be seen from Fig. S7 (Supporting information) that the overall temperature of reaction system raised gradually during the reaction due to the photothermal conversion effect of the catalyst.

Furthermore, the photothermal conversion efficiency of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 was evaluated. The materials were dispersed in aqueous solution with water as the negative control. Initial temperature of the solution and room temperature were controlled at 20 ℃. The solutions were irradiated under the Xe lamp and the lamp was turned off after 1200 s, and the temperature change was observed for 3000 s (Figs. 2a and b). The highest temperature of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 aqueous solution is 79.6 ℃ while the temperature of TiO2 aqueous solution is only 53.8 ℃ (Fig. 2a). It is worth noting that the highest temperature of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 solution is slightly lower than that of black TiO2. Considering that near-infrared (NIR) absorption ability has marked impact on photothermal conversion [37], UV-vis-NIR DRS of the catalysts were conducted. As shown in Fig. S8, TiO2 displays poor NIR response and the loading of Ru improve its NIR absorption. However, there is no significant difference between the spectra of black TiO2 and Ru/black TiO2, which means that the intrinsic NIR absorption of black TiO2 is higher than that of Ru NPs. Therefore, the photothermal conversion capacity of black TiO2 is slightly higher than that of Ru/black TiO2. The photothermal conversion efficiency (η) can be calculated based on Eq. 1 [37-39]:

(1)
Download:
Fig. 2. (a) Temperature curves of pure water, TiO2, black TiO2 and 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 aqueous solution (200 µg/mL) under irradiation. (b) The temperature curve of the 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 aqueous solution (200 µg/mL) for 3000 s. (c) Linear time data versus -lnθ obtained from the cooling period.

where h, A, I, ΔTmax, mix and ΔTmax, H2O represent the heat transfer coefficient, the container surface area, the total energy Ru/black TiO2 nanoparticles absorbed, the temperature change of the 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 suspension and water at the maximum stable temperature, respectively. Based on the fitting parameters of the cooling period in Fig. 2c, the η value of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 is calculated to be 37.9%. The calculation details can be seen in the Supporting Information. Owing to the efficient photothermal conversion based on black TiO2, strong heat center can be produced on the catalyst surface under irradiation, improving the substances (CO2 and H2) activation and accelerating the reaction [40].

Subsequently, to verify the participation of photogenerated carriers during the CO2 conversion, the irradiation intensity was decreased to 1 sun (100 mW/cm2) and a series of experiments at different temperatures were conducted. The experiments were carried out at 180, 200, 220 and 240 ℃, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3, the methane yield increased with the increase of temperature, which indicates that the increase of reaction temperature is conducive to the methanation of CO2. Most importantly, the CH4 yields increased at all temperatures after the introduction of light and highest synergy was obtained at 220 ℃, which means that intrinsic excitation process of the catalysts may played an important role during the reaction.

Download:
Fig. 3. The yield of CH4 from catalytic conversion of CO2 at different temperatures (reaction conditions: 0.4 MPa mixture gas-N2: H2: CO2 = 4:5:1, 20 mg 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2, 1 h, 100 mW/cm2).

Considering the large band gap of Al2O3, Ru/Al2O3 was prepared to avoid the excitation of catalyst and its catalytic performance was observed to further confirm the effect of photogenerated carriers. As displayed in the Fig. 3, the CH4 yield showed no significant increase over Ru/Al2O3 after the introduction of light. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that, during the hydrogenation of CO2 over Ru/black TiO2, not only the heat input generated from photothermal conversion but also the photogenerated carriers promote the conversion of CO2. The role photogenerated carriers played during CO2 conversion were investigated in mechanism discussion section.

According to the above results and the reported CO2 hydrogenation mechanism, the functionary mechanism of photogenerated carrier was proposed (Fig. S9 in Supporting information). Due to the low Fermi level of Ru and the well-contacted interface between Ru nanoparticle and black TiO2 nanoparticle (Fig. 1f), it is reasonable to speculate that the photogenerated electrons would be gathered in Ru nanoparticles, forming electron-rich Ru surface. Furthermore, to monitor the electron density variation of Ru nanoparticles, in situ high-resolution XPS was carried out. As displayed in Fig. 4, the binding energy of Ru 3d5/2 shows a significant decrease after the introduction of light. In addition, with the gradual increase of irradiation intensity and irradiation time, the binding energy of Ru 3d5/2 displayed a further shifting tendency.

Download:
Fig. 4. In situ high-resolution XPS spectrum of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2. (a) Ru 3d5/2 of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 obtained under irradiation (100 mW/cm2); (b) survey spectrum; (c) Ru 3d5/2 of 2 wt% Ru/black TiO2 obtained under irradiation (1000 mW/cm2).

Considering that the increase of electron density can enhance the shielding effect of electron clouds, which would decrease the binding energy of Ru 3d core level, it is reasonable to speculate that an electron injection process is achieved during the reaction. In contrast, the introduction of light caused the increase of O 1s binding energy (Fig. S10 in Supporting information), indicating that oxygen is in electron deficient state, which could be owing to the photogenerated holes. It is worth noting that the activation of H2 is essential for the CO2 hydrogenation. The formation of electron-rich Ru surface can provide more negative hydride, thus enhancing the nucleophilic attack reactivity of the hydride to the carbon center of CO2 [41,42]. Besides, the light with larger wavelength could be converted into heat due to the photothermal conversion, further improving the CO2 conversion. It is one promising way to achieve efficient hydrogenation of CO2 using light as the only driving force based on the synergy between photocatalysis and thermocatalysis.

Additionally, a series of Ru/black TiO2 catalysts with different Ru loading amount were prepared and the circulation stability test was carried out. The CH4 yield increased with the increase of Ru loading amount and 93.8% of CH4 yield was achieved within 2 h over 5 wt% Ru/black TiO2 (Fig. S11 in Supporting information). The H2-temperature programmed desorption (TPD) was carried out to investigate the adsorption strength between the adsorbed hydrogen and catalysts. As displayed in Fig. S12 (Supporting information), all tested catalysts displayed two significant hydrogen desorption peaks. The desorption peaks around 270 ℃ could be ascribed to the weakly adsorbed hydrogen on Ru surface and the peaks at high temperature (around 340 ℃) could be ascribed to the strongly adsorbed hydrogen on the surface of black TiO2 caused by hydrogen spillover [43-45]. Such spillover could do contribution to the hydrogenation of CO2. Additionally, no significant decrease in CH4 yield was observed during the stability test of 5 wt% Ru/black TiO2 (Fig. S13 in Supporting information). The XRD patterns of the collected catalysts after stability test display similar XRD patterns (Fig. S14 in Supporting information) and no high temperature phases such as rutile TiO2 were produced after reaction, indicating that the catalyst can maintain desirable stability under the current reaction conditions.

In summary, a black TiO2 supported catalyst was constructed for the photothermal catalytic CO2 hydrogenation. Owing to the introduction of oxygen vacancies, the CO2 adsorption ability of the black TiO2 supported catalyst was significantly enhanced, improving the CO2 conversion. The wide spectral response range and high photothermal conversion efficiency of black TiO2 brought desirable catalytic performance for photocatalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to the prepared Ru/black TiO2. Additionally, based on the well-contacted interface between Ru nanoparticle and black TiO2 nanoparticle, an electron injection process was achieved to form electron-rich Ru metal nanoparticles, further improving the hydrogenation of CO2. This study opens the step for full wavelength range utilization of solar energy in light-driven conversion of CO2.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21978170), the National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0506004), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 19ZR1424800), and the Center of Hydrogen Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.046.

References
[1]
J. Albero, Y. Peng, H. Garcia, ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 5734-5749. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.0c00478
[2]
M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, A. Angelini, Chem. Rev. 114 (2014) 1709-1742. DOI:10.1021/cr4002758
[3]
K. Li, B. Peng, T. Peng, ACS Catal. 6 (2016) 7485-7527. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b02089
[4]
Z. Jiang, H. Sun, T. Wang, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 11 (2018) 2382-2389. DOI:10.1039/C8EE01781F
[5]
W. Wang, G. Li, D. Xia, et al., Environ. Sci. 4 (2017) 782-799 Nano.
[6]
W. Wang, T. An, G. Li, et al., Appl. Catal. B 217 (2017) 570-580. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.027
[7]
L.B. Hoch, P.G. O'Brien, A. Jelle, et al., ACS Nano 10 (2016) 9017-9025. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.6b05416
[8]
J.C. Kennedy, A.K. Datye, J. Catal. 179 (1998) 375-389. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1998.2242
[9]
X. Meng, T. Wang, L. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 11478-11482. DOI:10.1002/anie.201404953
[10]
L. Wang, Y. Dong, T. Yan, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 2432. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-16336-z
[11]
M. Ghoussoub, M. Xia, P.N. Duchesne, D. Segal, G. Ozin, Energy Environ. Sci. 12 (2019) 1122-1142. DOI:10.1039/C8EE02790K
[12]
Y. Li, J. Hao, H. Song, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 2359. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-10304-y
[13]
Z. Li, R. Shi, J. Zhao, T. Zhang, Nano Res. 14 (2021) 4828-4832. DOI:10.1007/s12274-021-3436-6
[14]
N.T. Nguyen, M. Xia, P.N. Duchesne, et al., Nano Lett. 21 (2021) 1311-1319. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04008
[15]
Z. Li, J. Liu, R. Shi, G.I.N. Waterhouse, X. Wen, T. Zhang, Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2002783. DOI:10.1002/aenm.202002783
[16]
S.N. Habisreutinger, L. Schmidt-Mende, J.K. Stolarczyk, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 7372-7408. DOI:10.1002/anie.201207199
[17]
D. Mateo, J. Albero, H. Garcia, Joule 3 (2019) 1949-1962. DOI:10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.001
[18]
X. He, A. Wang, P. Wu, et al., Sci. Total Environ. 743 (2020) 140694. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140694
[19]
M. Nemiwal, T. Zhang, D. Kumar, Sci. Total Environ. 767 (2021) 144896. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144896
[20]
X. Chen, L. Liu, P.Y. Yu, S.S. Mao, Science 331 (2011) 746-750. DOI:10.1126/science.1200448
[21]
X. Chen, L. Liu, F. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 1861-1885. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00330F
[22]
Y.H. Hu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 12410-12412. DOI:10.1002/anie.201206375
[23]
A. Naldoni, M. Allieta, S. Santangelo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 7600-7603. DOI:10.1021/ja3012676
[24]
W. Zhou, W. Li, J.Q. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 9280-9283. DOI:10.1021/ja504802q
[25]
A. Naldoni, M. Altomare, G. Zoppellaro, et al., ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 345-364. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b04068
[26]
X. Lu, A. Chen, Y. Luo, et al., Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 5751-5755. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02454
[27]
T.D. Nguyen, J. Li, E. Lizundia, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 (2019) 1904639. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201904639
[28]
Z. Geng, X. Kong, W. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 6054-6059. DOI:10.1002/anie.201711255
[29]
J. Ye, C. Liu, D. Mei, Q. Ge, ACS Catal. 3 (2013) 1296-1306. DOI:10.1021/cs400132a
[30]
L. Pan, M. Ai, C. Huang, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 418. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-14333-w
[31]
Q. Wang, W. Wang, L. Zhong, et al., Appl. Catal. B 220 (2018) 290-302. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.049
[32]
C. Xu, W. Huang, Z. Li, et al., ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 6582-6593. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b00272
[33]
H. Song, C. Li, Z. Lou, Z. Ye, L. Zhu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 (2017) 8982-8987. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01774
[34]
X. Gao, S. Zhu, M. Dong, J. Wang, W. Fan, Appl. Catal. B 259 (2019) 118076. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118076
[35]
X. Lin, K. Yang, R. Si, et al., Appl. Catal. B 147 (2014) 585-591. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.035
[36]
T. Jedsukontorn, T. Ueno, N. Saito, M. Hunsom, J. Alloys Compd. 726 (2017) 567-577. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.028
[37]
Y. Liu, K. Ai, J. Liu, et al., Adv. Mater. 25 (2013) 1353-1359. DOI:10.1002/adma.201204683
[38]
D.K. Roper, W. Ahn, M. Hoepfner, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 3636-3641. DOI:10.1021/jp064341w
[39]
Q. Zou, M. Abbas, L. Zhao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 1921-1927. DOI:10.1021/jacs.6b11382
[40]
M. Cai, C. Li, L. He, Rare Met. 39 (2020) 881-886. DOI:10.1007/s12598-020-01431-3
[41]
X. Lv, G. Lu, Z. Wang, Z. Xu, G. Guo, ACS Catal. 7 (2017) 4519-4526. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b00277
[42]
Q. Liu, X. Yang, L. Li, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1407. DOI:10.1038/s41467-017-01673-3
[43]
X. Wang, P. Wu, Z. Wang, et al., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 9 (2021) 3083-3094. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07292
[44]
R. Prins, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012) 2714-2738. DOI:10.1021/cr200346z
[45]
Z. Wu, Y. Mao, X. Wang, M. Zhang, Green Chem. 13 (2011) 1311-1316. DOI:10.1039/c0gc00809e