四川动物  2016, Vol. 35 Issue (6): 825-832

扩展功能

文章信息

孙飞达, 苟文龙, 李飞, 朱灿, 路慧, 陈文业
SUN Feida, GOU Wenlong, LI Fei, ZHU Can, LU Hui, CHEN Wenye
青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统高原鼠兔种群调查及其防控阈值研究
Plateau Pika Population Survey and its Control Threshold in the Alpine Meadow Ecosystems of the Tibetan Plateau
四川动物, 2016, 35(6): 825-832
Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 2016, 35(6): 825-832
10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20160073

文章历史

收稿日期: 2016-04-05
接受日期: 2016-08-18
青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统高原鼠兔种群调查及其防控阈值研究
孙飞达1, 苟文龙2, 李飞1, 朱灿1, 路慧1, 陈文业3     
1. 四川农业大学动物科技学院, 成都 611130
2. 四川省草原科学研究院, 成都 611731
3. 甘肃省林业科学研究院, 兰州 730020
摘要: 认识高原鼠兔Ochotona curzoniae在草地退化中的角色和地位,对于加强高寒草甸生态系统高原鼠兔种群管理具有重要的意义。以高原鼠兔有效洞穴密度为调查对象,根据所调查的12个样地遴选出4个不同鼠洞等级的研究样地去评估鼠兔数量和植物生物量变化之间的关系。主要结论如下:高原鼠兔活动并非引起草地退化的原因,而是作为草地退化的标志性信号,然而高频度的鼠兔活动会加剧草地逆向演替的进程。因此,一些综合措施诸如减少牲畜数量、动态的轮牧、草地恢复管理技术、社区参与式管理等可以有效提高草地生产力和防止鼠害爆发。对各类型退化草地进行综合治理时,应加强对害鼠种群动态的监测,当种群密度超过经济阈值或达到高密度种群时,应急性、常规性灭鼠工作才可以实施,为重度型退化草地重建、植被恢复和土壤发育提供可能性。
关键词防控阈值     植物生物量     鼠害防控     草原管理    
Plateau Pika Population Survey and its Control Threshold in the Alpine Meadow Ecosystems of the Tibetan Plateau
SUN Feida1, GOU Wenlong2, LI Fei1, ZHU Can1, LU Hui1, CHEN Wenye3     
1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;
2. Sichuan Grassland Science Academy, Chengdu 611731, China;
3. Gansu Forestry Science and Technology Research Academy, Lanzhou 730020, China
Abstract: Understanding the roles of plateau pikas (Ochotona curzoniae) on grassland degradation is essential for improving the management of pika populations in alpine meadow ecosystem. In this study, 4 degrees of active burrows densities from 12 survey sites were defined to evaluate the interactions between pika populations and biomass changes. We conclude that pika activities may not be the cause but act as a symptom of grassland degradation, and the high-frequency of pika activities can promote to the process of reverse succession. Therefore, some comprehensive measures such as reduction of livestock numbers, variable grazing system, restorative management techniques, and community participation in co-management of the meadows are likely to effectively improve grassland productivity and prevent the outbreaks of pikas. Furthermore, pika population fluctuations should be monitored. When the population of pikas exceeds the economic threshold or reaches high-density, integrated management strategies should be implemented to prevent damage.
Key words: control threshold     plant biomass     rodents control     rangeland management    

Plateau pikas(Ochotona curzoniae)are small lagomorphs, endemic to parts of the Tibetan Plateau in China, India and Nepal(Bagchi et al., 2006), their grazing, burrowing, mowing, caching behaviours and food selection overlap with local yak(Bos grunniens)and Tibetan sheep(Ovis aries)(Fan & Zong, 1991; Pech et al. , 2007).

In the past, plateau pikas have been traditionally viewed as competitors with domestic livestock for forage, and agents of pasture desertification, soil erosion and vegetation disturbances(Smith & Foggin, 1999Zhang & Liu, 2003). On the other hand, plateau pikas also play a key role in maintaining ecosystem functions as a keystone species for providing a food resource for large mammalian predators such as foxes(Vulpes ferrilata), steppe polecats(Mustela eversmanni), Chinese mountain cats(Felis bieti), Pallas's cat(Otocolobus manul) and Eurasian lynx(Lynx lynx)(Smith & Foggin, 1999), and avian predators, such as golden eagles(Aquila chrysaetos), upland buzzards(Buteo hemilasius), saker falcons(Falco cherrug), goshawks(Accipiter gentiles), black kites(Milvus migrans)and little owls(Athene noctua)(Smith & Foggin, 1999; Lai & Smith, 2003; Zhang & Liu, 2003). Additionally, some abandoned tunnels provide homes for lizards, ground squirrels and native birds(Desmond & Savidge, 1996; Lai & Smith, 2003). An alternative view of plateau pikas is that they contribute to the overall health of alpine meadows by aerating the soilviatheir burrowing activities, promoting nutrient recycling within alpine ecosystems(Smith & Foggin, 1999; Li & Zhang, 2006).

Like other small herbivores, such as plateau zokors(Myospalax baileyi) , european rabbits(Oryctolagus cuniculus), pocket gophers(Thomomys bottae), prairie dogs(Cynomys ludovicianus)and water voles(Arvicola terrestris)in various grasslands types around the world, plateau pikas appear to have both detrimental and beneficial, direct and indirect, and long-term and short-term impacts on grassland ecosystems(Bagchi et al., 2006; Arthur et al., 2008; Delibes-Mateos et al ., 2011). When the pika populations reach a high density, eradication campaigns, mainly by putting poison baits in burrows, have been performed by Chinese local governments and organizations for many years(Fan et al., 1999; Zhang & Liu, 2003).

The positive or negative impact of pikas on grassland ecosystems have mainly been assessed with species abundance(Liu et al., 1980), however, researches on pika population survey method, high frequency activity and pika roles of "benefit-detrimental" transformation are limited and the results lack of quantitative evidences. We focused on plateau pika population survey method, biomass changes and herbivorous small mammal population effective management in the alpine meadow ecosystems.

1 Methods 1.1 Study area

Tibetan Plateau is located in southwest China with a high altitude, harsh environment where the grassland ecosystems have complex, sensitive and vulnerable characteristics(Long, 2007; Arthur et al., 2008). The climate shows strong seasonality, with an annual mean temperature<0 ℃, year-round frost and extensive areas of permafrost occur in mountains and grasslands. The major plant communities are alpine meadow, alpine swamp, alpine shrub, alpine prairie and alpine steppe meadow(Zhou et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008).

This study was carried out on the south-eastern flank of Qinghai province, part of the Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve, which is one of the largest nature reserves in the world(Worthy & Foggin, 2008). Plateau pikas had never been eradicated in this area, and all study sites consisted of gently undulating terrain with low, sparse alpine meadow, comprised mainly of Kobresia humilis grazed by yaks and sheep in the cold season from September to the following May.

1.2 Plateau pika burrow demography

Large circle sample(2 500 m2)method was used to investigate plateau pika burrow densities with the plugging tunnels method(PTM)in early May, 2008. We randomly selected 12 sites in alpine meadows within a similar habitat, where there were practically no subter-ranean zoker mounds and no zokers were trapped(Fig. 1), while the range of pika population abundance was deduced with active burrow ratio and the local burrow coefficient(Fig. 2: a, b). All surveys were conducted simultaneously at each site between 09∶ 00 and 11∶ 30(Sun et al., 2008; Zeng & Lu, 2009).

Fig. 1 Survey scheme for plateau pika burrows demography by large circle sample (r=28.2 m) with plugging tunnels method Make O as fixed centre of a circle, then carefully look for burrows along anticlockwise direction from A to B, C, D, A, or clockwise direction from A to D, C, B, A.

Fig. 2 The total, active burrows counts and their ratios of active burrow of 12 survey sites (a) and 4 degrees of pika population sites (b) Burrow density: AZD. approximately zero-density, LD. low-density, MD. medium-density, HD. high-density; capital and lowercase letters for a given variable indicate there is a significanr difference in the same plant speciece(P<0.05)and(P<0.01)among different treatments; the same below.

Considering the major grassland types of alpine meadow, and the status of site habitat and utilization, combined with cluster analysis, 4 degrees with active burrow densities were defined as approximately zero-density(AZD), low-density(LD), medium-density(MD), and high-density(HD)sites, respectively(Table 1; Fig. 2: b), then fenced with 50 m×50 m square to avoid livestock grazing and human activity.

Table 1 Geographical, plateau pika abundance and burrows counts of survey sites
ParameterSite
AZD LD MD HD
Total burrows/(hm-2)1021 1242 1242 780
Active burrows/(hm-2)48±8512±54864±851 360±152
Pika abundance/(hm-2)0~1515~110110~200200~300
Altitude/m3 7713 7693 7403 751
North latitude34°27.862′34°27.647′34°28.030′34°28.197′
East longitude100°12.182′100°12.596′100°12.624′100°28.060′
Notes: burrow density: AZD. approximately zero-density, LD. low-density, MD. medium-density, HD. high-density.
1.3 Plant composition and biomass

In each site, 5 random quadrats of 25 cm×25 cm were identified and the following parameters were recorded: plant species, overall vegetation cover and height in late August. Aboveground vegetation was sorted into four functional groups(grasses, sedges, forbs and litter)and clipped at ground level(Wang et al., 2008). After aboveground biomass harvest, belowground biomass was estimated from 10 cm×10 cm soil cores collected to 30 cm depth with each section 10 cm, because nearly all of Kobresiameadows roots were concentrated in this depth. At each sampling, 3 soil cores were collected on each plot. Mud and soil were carefully removed by rinsing with water, and the roots were divided into 2 parts: living and dead(Sun et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2010). All biomass materials were stored in paper bags, oven dried at 75 ℃ for 48 h and weighed.

2 Discussion 2.1 Plateau pika population survey

It is vital to collect the counts of plateau pikas accurately, to provide detailed information on population dynamics, to allow effective management measures to be implemented(Zhong & Fan, 2002). At present, there are many methods used in small animal surveys, such as active and inactive burrow counts, mark-resight, mark-recapture and live-capture methods with belt transects on plateau pikas, plateau zokers, European rabbits, pocket gophers, prairie dogs and water voles(Dobson et al., 1998; Brown et al., 2006). Active and inactive burrows are considered by some as the best indicator of intensity for herbivorous small mammal control(Desmond & Savidge, 1996; Desmond et al., 2000; Pech et al., 2007), but it is difficult to distinguish active and inactive entrances unambiguously through small herbivores footprint or/and fecal material(Pech et al., 2007). It seems that capturing individuals or mark-resight may be very close to the actual species abundance, yet it is not practical to use for a number of large experimental sites(Ma et al., 2002).

This study indicates that, in alpine meadow ecosystems, the active burrow count to represent plateau pika abundance, using the plugging tunnel method is accurate, operable and practical. Within the active burrow ratios of our survey sites, where the mean active burrows ratio and the burrow coefficient were 42.8% and 3.3, over the counts of 200 pika and/or 1 360 active burrows per hectare could be the "high-density" in Guoluo pasture. However, the relationship between pika population and the total burrows(Pech et al., 2007)was not good. The causes may be that pika abundance show large seasonal and regional variations related to microhabitat, vegetation, precipitation and grasslands utilization(Ma et al., 2002; Sun et al., 2010).

In short, the demography of plateau pika is a direct indicator to evaluate the impacts of pika populations on grasslands, and whether their impacts are beneficial or detrimental in alpine meadow ecosystems. Pikas have the natural characteristics of transferring and moving frequently for food and exercises(Smith & Foggin, 1999), but the active burrows, as dwelling homes, still are their activities assembly area. Through large-scale active burrow ratio and burrow coefficient investigation, active burrow densities could be more objectively and truly reflected the pika population fluctuations.

2.2 Plant functional groups, aboveground and belowground biomass allocation

Fig. 3 demonstrates that aboveground, belowground and total biomass varied with seasons. Total biomass is made up of aboveground and belowground biomass components. Overall there were significant differences in aboveground biomass(F=1 026.366, P<0.001)and belowground biomass(F=23 754.111, P<0.001).

Fig. 3 Seasonal fluctuations of aboveground (a) and belowground (b) biomass at different sites Thick dash lines describe their own mean seasonal biomass, e.g., MAZD is the abbreviation of mean seasonal biomass of site AZD, etc.

Aboveground biomass increased to the maximum in August(LD, MD and HD)and September(AZD)then declined rapidly in October, yet the sequence of mean seasonal aboveground biomass was AZD(278.2 g·m-2)> MD(137.1 g·m-2)>HD(106.7 g·m-2)>LD(93.5 g·m-2)(Fig. 3: a). The minimum belowground biomass occurred in August, and the sequence of mean seasonal belowground was AZD(6 084.2 g·m-2)>LD(3 436.0 g·m-2)>HD(2 748.5 g·m-2)>MD(2 197.0 g·m-2)(Fig. 3: b).

Fig. 4 presents the proportions of sedges, grasses, forbs and litter group biomass of the four sites. The sequences of seasonal average plant functional group biomass proportions were as follows, sedges: LD(36.9%)>AZD(25.3%)>HD(6.6%)>MD(3.1%); grasses: LD(20.1%)>AZD(15.0%)>HD(13.2%)>MD(8.0%); forbs: MD(57.7%)>HD(57.4%)>AZD(27.2%)>LD(23.3%); litter: AZD(32.6%)>MD(31.6%)>HD(22.5%)>LD(19.7%); moreover, palatable herbage: LD(57.0%)>AZD(40.2%)>HD(19.8%)>MD(11.0%).

Fig. 4 Seasonal fluctuations of plant functional groups of sedges, grasses, forbs and litter biomass at different sites

The consumption of vegetation and burrowing can affect aboveground(shoots)and belowground(roots), which could in turn affect plant community composition, aboveground biomass allocation and root system characters(Pokorny et al., 2005). Sedges and grasses are the dominant palatable forages resources, but forbs, which are usually considered to be toxic, are not palatable forage for livestock.

In alpine meadows, perennial plants turn green in May and absolutely withered and yellow in October. For sedges, however, the dominant functional group did change with altitude, site habitat, degradation and reverse succession(Wang et al., 2008). In this study, pika burrowing activities may increase the plant species richness(Smith & Foggin, 1999)was not appeared, maybe it will take long-term controlled experiments to evaluate the full relationship between plateau pikas and plant diversity. However, certain plants such asLigularia virgaurea, Aconitum pendulum, Euphorbia ftscheriana, and Anaphalis lactealonly grow on the burrows and/or off-burrows.

Above- and below-ground biomass allocation is a central issue in plant ecology, however, the strategies of allocation in plants remain contentious(Yang et al., 2009). R∶ S ratios increased with belowground competition, suggesting that it is an adaptive response, but it could have been affected by the activity of herbivorous animals rather than adaptive plasticity(Craine, 2006). Plants can also alter their living root growth in response to the presence of external disturbance, and a plant adaptation strategy could alter plant rooting depths(Yang et al., 2009). In our study, R∶ S ratios were widely dispersed and the lowest value occurred in site HD, which were higher than those of analogous research on alpine meadows with different conditions such as degradation, altitude and areal extent(Wang et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2009). Pika transfers and activities disturbed the grassland habitat and increased the prevalence of community species but decreased biomass and palatable forage.

2.3 Implications fo