文章信息
- 李永丽, 周洲, 娄金凤, 胡雅静, 时苗均
- Li Yongli, Zhou Zhou, Lou Jinfeng, Hu Yajing, Shi Miaojun
- 一种引起虎皮兰叶斑病的刺孢壳属真菌的生物学特性
- Biological Characteristics of Chaetomella sp.(Sphaeropsidaceae), A Novel Causal Agent of Sansevieria Leaf Spot Disease
- 林业科学, 2015, 51(8): 121-126
- Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(8): 121-126.
- DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150816
-
文章历史
- 收稿日期:2014-09-24
- 修回日期:2015-04-01
-
作者相关文章
Sansevieria trifasciata is native to west Africa.It is widely grown as a potted ornamental plant in China because it improves indoor air quality by passively absorbing toxins,such as nitrogen oxides,formaldehyde(Wolverton et al., 1989), and ozone(Papinchaki et al., 2009).S.trifasciata leaf spots are caused by Fusarium moniliforme (Jones,1940),Pythium spinosum (Takeuchi et al., 2002), and Colletotrichum sansevieriae (Nakamura et al., 2006;Aldaoud et al., 2011).
Chaetomella(Sphaeropsidaceae)is a fungus distributed worldwide that can infect numerous plant species,such as Pennisetum sp.(Sydow et al., 1916),Cycas revoluta,Ficus bengalensis,Bambusa sp.(Ramchandre et al., 1965),Rosa rugosa (Margorie,1930),sterile oak(DiCosmo et al., 1980),Cuphea spp.(Singh et al., 1999), and Eucalyptus grandis (Pérez-Vera et al., 2005).In addition,Chaetomella raphigera is an endophytic fungus that can produce anticancer drugs(Gangadevi et al., 2009).In China,a new leaf spot disease has been reported to affect S.trifasciata and constrain its growth(Li et al., 2013).We identified the pathogen as Chaetomella sp.using morphological and molecular methods(Li et al., 2013).The new leaf spot disease should be biologically characterized to establish a control method.This study aimed to control the disease by evaluating the effects of environmental factors and susceptibility of various plant species to pathogen causing S.trifasciata leaf spot disease.
2 Materials and methods 2.1 PathogenA fungal culture(HPL06)was isolated from diseased leaf samples collected from S.trifasciata in Luoyang City,Henan Province,in 2011.The isolate was incubated on potato dextrose agar(PDA: 200 g of potato,20 g of glucose, and 15 g of agar in 1 000 mL of water;pH 7.0)plates.
2.2 Biological characterizationTo determine the effect of temperature on fungal growth,we placed 5 mm mycelial discs in the middle of a Petri dish containing PDA.These discs were removed from five-day-old colonies cultured on PDA plates.The Petri dish was then incubated at temperatures ranging from 5 ℃ to 40 ℃ at 5 ℃ intervals for 3 d(triplicates per temperature).Colony diameters were determined using the cross-measurement(CM)method.Triplicate measurements were averaged to obtain colony diameters.
To investigate the effect of pH on fungal growth,we adjusted the pH of PDA to various levels(pH 4-11)at intervals of 1 unit by adding an appropriate amount of 1 mol·L-1 HCl or NaOH solution.We obtained 5 mm mycelial discs from five-day-old colonies cultured on PDA plates.These discs were inoculated onto the center of new PDA plates with different pH levels(triplicates per pH level).Colony diameters were measured three times using the CM method and then averaged.
To evaluate the effect of light environment on fungal growth,we transferred 5 mm mycelial discs onto the center of new PDA plates.These discs were removed from a five-day-old colony cultured on PDA plates.The Petri dish was placed in a chamber with an illuminating lamp at 28 ℃ at a distance of 20 cm between the lamp and dish.Four light environments were used to assess the influence of cultural conditions on fungal growth.The conditions of these light environments were as follows:1)alternating cycles of 12 h of fluorescent light(50-60 klx·m-2 light intensity)/12 h darkness,2)natural light,3)continuous irradiation with fluorescent light(50-60 klx·m-2 light intensity), and 4)complete darkness.Each treatment was performed in triplicate.The average of three replicates was used to determine colony diameters using the CM method.
To assess the effect of nitrogen and carbon sources on fungal growth,we inoculated 5 mm mycelial discs onto the centers of different media.These discs were obtained from five-day-old colonies cultured on PDA plates.In PDA,dextrose was replaced by sucrose,fructose,maltose, and lactose as carbon sources.Mycelial discs were placed on PDA medium as contrast.The total carbon content of these carbon sources was equal.In Richard medium(10 g of KNO3,5 g of KH2PO4,2.5 g of MgSO4,0.02 g of FeCl3,30 g of sucrose, and 15 g of agar in 1 000 mL of water),potassium nitrate was replaced by ammonium sulfate,glutamic acid,asparagine, and ammonium chloride as nitrogen sources.Mycelial discs were placed on Richard and PDA media as contrast.The total nitrogen content of these nitrogen sources was equal.Each treatment was performed in triplicate.The average of triplicate measurements was used to determine colony diameters using the CM method.The isolates were incubated at 28 ℃ for 3 d under different pH values,light environment, and nitrogen sources, and at 28 ℃ for 5 d under different carbon sources.
2.3 Host range investigationThe pathogenicity of the isolate was tested among 62 plant species covering 23 families.All test plants were collected from Luoyang.All fully developed leaves from the test plants collected from Luoyang were sterilized with 75% ethanol, and washed three times with sterilized distilled water.Fresh wounds were performed with a sterile needle on healthy leaves.Two methods were used for inoculation.1)A 5 mm mycelial disc cut from the margin of a five-day-old colony cultured on a PDA plate was placed on each pin-wounded leaf to ensure that the mycelium was in contact with the wound.Non-colonized PDA discs were placed on pin-wounded leaves as the control treatment.Eight leaves of one plant were inoculated.2)The isolate was grown on PDA for 5 d and then suspended in sterile distilled water to produce a suspension with a final concentration of 1×105 spores·mL-1.The isolate was spray-inoculated with a spore suspension on three leaves of one plant.Sterile distilled water was used as a negative control.The inoculated leaves were stored in a moist chamber and examined daily for symptom development.
3 Results 3.1 Biological characteristicsThe temperature for vegetative growth of the isolate ranged from 15 ℃ to 35 ℃, and the optimal temperature was 25-30 ℃(Tab.1).The pH for vegetative growth of the isolate ranged from 4 to 11, and the optimal pH was 4(Tab.2)The fungus could grow in four light environments,but the colony diameters of the isolate subjected to continuously irradiated fluorescent light were larger than those under the other light conditions(Tab.3).Chaetomella sp.grew well on media containing five carbon sources, and dextrose was the optimal carbon source(Tab.4).Moreover,Chaetomella sp.grew well on media comprising potassium nitrate,ammonium sulfate,glutamic acid,asparagine, and ammonium chloride as nitrogen sources(Tab.5).
Among the 62 plant species tested from 23 families,46 species covering 20 families were found to be susceptible to Chaetomella sp.via inoculation with mycelial discs(Fig. 1 and Tab.3).A total of 30 species covering 12 families were also determined to be susceptible to Chaetomella sp.via inoculation with conidial suspension (Tab.6).
Some species possess an ethnopharmacological background;in particular,S.trifasciata grown in south Africa and tropical America is used for the treatment of inflammatory conditions, and marketed as a crude drug in the market to treat victims of snakebite(Morton,1981).S.trifasciata is widely grown as a potted ornamental plant in China because it can absorb toxins(Cao et al., 2009).It also demonstrates strong ability to adapt to the environment.The new leaf spot disease caused by Chaetomella sp.affects the health and ornamental value of S.trifasciata.
Chaetomella sp.widely exists in nature, and can cause diseases in many plants.The host range experiment demonstrated that the isolate of Chaetomella sp.from S.trifasciata could infect plants from 23 families(Tab.6).The number of newly discovered plants susceptible to Chaetomella sp.comprised 74.19% of the total number of plants tested(Tab.6).We speculated that a large number of plants susceptible to Chaetomella sp.may exist in nature.Such plants may be considered as potential hosts of the pathogen.Chaetomella sp.may infect potential hosts if these plants are commercially cultivated on a large scale under conditions conducive to disease development.On the other hand ,plants not susceptible to Chaetomella sp.might be due to growth suppression of the pathogen by unknown antifungal substance.The non-host plants might be considered as promising sources for screening of botanical fungicide(s)against Chaetomella sp.
The effects of illumination,temperature,pH,carbon source levels, and nitrogen source levels on the vegetative growth of Chaetomella sp.were also characterized(Tab.1-5).The isolate could exist in various conditions and adapt to various environments.Further field studies on the occurrence of the new Sansevieria leaf spot disease are needed to establish a science-based disease management strategy.Such studies are important because Chaetomella sp.is a new causal organism of Sansevieria leaf spots and the host range of the pathogen has increased.
[1] | Aldaoud R, DeAlwis S, Salib S, et al. 2011. First record of Colletotrichum sansevieriae on sansevieriae sp.(mother-in-law’s tongue) in Australia. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 6(1):60-61.(1) |
[2] | Cao S J, Pan B H, Tian Y C,et al. 2009. Comparison of ability of absorbing formaldehyde among 6 species of indoor ornamentals. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 18(5): 1798-1801. (1) |
[3] | DiCosmo F, Garry T C. 1980. Morphogenesis of conidiomata in Chaetomella acutiseta (Coelomycetes). Canadian Journal of Botany, 58 (10):1129-1137.(1) |
[4] | Gangadevi V, Muthumary J. 2009. A novel endophytic taxol-producing fungus Chaetomella raphigera isolated from a medicinal plant, Terminalia arjuna. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 158(3):675-684.(1) |
[5] | Jones L K. 1940. Fusarium leaf spot of Sansevieria. Phytopathology, 30(6):527-530.(1) |
[6] | Li Y L, Zhou Z, Lu W, et al. 2013. First report of a Chaetomella sp. causing a leaf spot on Sansevieria trifasciata in China. Plant Disease, 97(7):992.(1) |
[7] | Margorie E S. 1930. A new species Chaetomella on rose. Mycologia, 22(1):165-168.(1) |
[8] | Morton J F. 1981. Atlas of medicinal plants of middle America. Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 90.(1) |
[9] | Nakamura M, Ohzono M, Iwai H,et al. 2006. Anthracnose of sansevieria trifasciata caused by Colletotrichum sansevieriae sp. Nov. J Gen Plant Pathol, 72(4):253-256.(1) |
[10] | Papinchaki H L, Holcom E J, Best T O,et al. 2009. Effectiveness of houseplants in reducing the indoor air pollutant ozone. Horttechnology, 19(2): 286-290.(1) |
[11] | Pérez-Vera O A, Yáñez-Morales de J, Alvarado-Rosales P, et al. 2005. Fungi associated to eucalyptus: Eucalyptus grandis. Agrociencia, 39(3):311-318.(1) |
[12] | Ramchandre R S, Kale B. 1965. Some new host records of Chaetomella cycadina Ramchandre Rao & Baheker from India. Mycopathologia, 28(1):55-56.(1) |
[13] | Singh H B,Johri J K, Singh M, et al. 1999. A new leaf spot disease of Cuphea spp. caused by Chaetomella raphigera. EPPO Bulletin, 29(1/2):213-214.(1) |
[14] | Sydow H, Butler E J. 1916. Fungi Indiae orientalis. V. Ann Mycol, 14: 177-220.(1) |
[15] | Takeuchi J, Horie H, Nishimura S. 2002. First report of Pythium rot sansevieria trifasciata caused by Pythium spinosum in Japan. Ann Rept Kanto-Tosan Plant Prot Soc, 89-91.(1) |
[16] | Wolverton B C, Johnson A, Bounds K. 1989. Interior landscape plants for indoor air pollution abatement-Final report. NASA/ALCA, Plants for Clean Air Council, Davidsonville, 14-26.(1) |