Damage Detection of the Pipes Conveying Fluid on the Pasternak Foundation Using the Matching Pursuit Method
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-025-00638-z
-
Abstract
The current study examines damage detection in fluid-conveying pipes supported on a Pasternak foundation. This study proposes a novel method that uses the matching pursuit (MP) algorithm for damage detection. The governing equations of motion for the pipe are derived using Hamilton's principle. The finite element method, combined with the Galerkin approach, is employed to obtain the mass, damping, and stiffness matrices. To identify damage locations through pipe mode-shape decomposition, an index called the "matching pursuit residual" is introduced as a novel contribution of this study. The proposed method facilitates damage detection at various levels and locations under different boundary conditions. The findings demonstrate that the MP residual damage index can accurately localize damage in the pipes. Furthermore, the results of the numerical and experimental tests showcase the efficiency of the proposed method, highlighting that the MP signal approximation algorithm effectively detects damage in structures.-
Keywords:
- Damage detection ·
- Matching pursuit ·
- Damaged pipe ·
- Galerkin method ·
- Finite element method
Article Highlights● This article demonstrates the effectiveness of the signal approximation method, matching pursuit, in detecting damage in pipes conveying fluid on the Pasternak foundation.● The article introduces a novel damage index, the matching pursuit residual, which is obtained by subtracting the signals approximated using the matching pursuit method from the original vibration mode shape signals of the damaged pipes conveying fluid on the Pasternak foundation.● Numerical and experimental results demonstrate that the signal reconstruction algorithm is suitable for vibration mode shapebased damage detection. -
1 Introduction
Fluid-carrying pipes have varied applications in engineering fields and play a crucial role in transporting fluids such as oil, gas, and seawater (Wang, 2018). These pipes are often situated in challenging environments, such as offshore platforms, industrial plants, and urban infrastructure, where the risk of damage is significant. Therefore, understanding the dynamic behaviors of both intact and damaged fluid-conveying pipes is critical for ensuring their structural integrity and safe operation. This knowledge is particularly valuable to industries such as energy, petrochemicals, and civil engineering, where the prevention of pipeline failures can prevent costly downtime, environmental hazards, and safety risks. Additionally, developing effective damage detection methods (Song et al., 2018) can aid in proactive maintenance and extend the lifespan of these essential systems. Additionally, many structures are situated on foundations for which researchers used different mathematical models (Belabed et al., 2024; Bouafia et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2022; Lafi et al., 2024; Tounsi et al., 2024; Tounsi et al., 2023a; Tounsi et al., 2023b; Bounouara et al., 2023; Zaitoun et al., 2023; Tahir et al., 2022; Mudhaffar et al., 2023).
The investigation of vibrations in fluid-carrying pipes began in 1950 with the work of Ashley and Haviland (1950). The dynamic behaviors of these pipes were studied both theoretically (Benjamin, 1962) and experimentally (Benjamin, 1961). For example, Fu et al. (2023) investigated the nonlinear vibration analysis of viscoelastic axially functionally graded material pipes conveying pulsating internal flow. They found that elastic modulus, density, and coefficient of viscoelastic damping of the pipe material varied along the axial direction. They also used Euler–Bernoulli beam theory to model the transverse vibration equation of the viscoelastic axially functionally graded material pipe conveying pulsating fluid. Vassilev and Djoundjorov (2006) analyzed the dynamic stability of fluid-carrying pipes using the Galerkin method. Chellapilla and Simha (2007) employed the Fourier series and Galerkin method to study the critical velocity of fluid-carrying pipes on a foundation, examining the problem under three different boundary conditions. The interaction between the fluid and the pipe was explored using the finite element (FE) method (Olson and Jamison, 1997) and the spectral FE method (Lee and Oh, 2003; Lee and Park, 2006). Chu and Lin (1995) presented a general FE formulation employing cubic Hermite interpolation for the dynamic analysis of fluid transmission pipes, considering both shear deformation and rotary inertia. In their work, they considered the dynamic effect of the fluid as external distributed forces acting on the supporting pipe.
Liu et al. (2010) studied the effect of hydrostatic pressure on the vibration dispersion characteristics of fluid-shell coupled structures, considering fluid-loaded cylindrical shells and fluid-filled cylindrical shells. Zhang et al. (2002) investigated the application of three-dimensional (3D) linearized Euler equations and the theory of linearized tension in their research. In this study, an FE formulation based on 3D elasticity theory for the shell was presented, along with the linearized Euler equation for the fluid. Li et al. (2018) investigated the application of the Galerkin method to represent the dynamic response of a fluid-conveying pipe with laterally moving supports at both ends of the pipe. Li et al. (2015a) also examined the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a submerged beam with moving supports at both ends. They derived the equation of motion using a Newtonian approach, after which they added a mass coefficient for the fluid mass attached to the beams. To investigate the dynamic behavior and stability of a multi-mouth fluid transmission pipe, El-Sayed and El-Mongy (2019) presented a new formula based on the variable iteration method. Huang et al. (2010) obtained the natural frequency of fluid-structure interaction in a fluid transmission pipeline using the Reduced-Order-Element-Galerkin method, deriving the natural frequency equations for various boundary conditions. Li and Yang (2017) determined the critical flow velocity and frequency of a fluid transmission pipe using a new semi-analytical method, considering the effects of boundary conditions. Ma et al. (2023) developed the harmonic differential quadrature method to analyze the one-dimensional vibration of pipes conveying fluid under various boundary conditions. This method employed trigonometric functions to formulate the harmonic test function, and the weighting coefficients were calculated explicitly.
Using FE tools, Chatzopoulou et al. (2016) investigated the influence of rotational loading on the mechanical behavior of seamless steel pipes with thick walls in deep water. Ni et al. (2011) presented a semi-analytical method and differential transformation technique to analyze the free vibration of fluid transmission pipes with different boundary conditions. Using the Euler–Bernoulli beam model and the generalized integral transform method, Fu et al. (2024) analyzed the dynamic behavior of an axially functionally graded pipeline conveying gas–liquid two-phase flow. They found that the interactions between structures and fluids refer to the effects that fluids exert on structures, which can manifest through various forces. Such an interaction is often of significant interest to engineers and structural designers.
Meanwhile, Tijsseling (1996) conducted a review of the literature on transient phenomena in fluid-filled pipes by focusing on the history of fluid-structure interaction research in the time domain. Using the FE method, Zhai et al. (2011) obtained the governing equation of the fluid-carrying pipe considering fluid-structure interaction and the effect of shear deformation. To solve this equation, they employed a combination of the perturbation method with the Galerkin method. Li et al. (2015b) provided a broad overview of the literature on the dynamic analysis of fluid-filled pipe systems with a focus on fluid-structure interaction. They compared models and simulation algorithms of varying degrees of sophistication and discussed their range of applications.
The dynamics of fluid-carrying pipes were experimentally investigated by Jendrzejczyk and Chen (1985) under six different types of boundary conditions. Anand (2015) conducted an analytical study of the laminar flow of nanofluids in a circular tube immersed in an isothermal external fluid. Ghadirian et al. (2022) examined nonlinear free vibrations and stability of fluid transmission pipes made of composite materials. They derived the equations of motion for the system using Hamilton's extended principle for open systems based on Timoshenko's beam theory. Meanwhile, Song et al. (2018) used guided waves and conducted a series of experiments on damage detection in large-diameter pipes, both with and without liquid. In their study, two types of liquid‒water and machine oil‒were chosen to fill the pipes and assess the influence of the filler. Meenakumari et al. (2024) investigated the fluid-structure interaction phenomena of a submerged long flexible cylinder conveying two-phase slug flows, considering the geometric and hydrodynamic nonlinearities.
Li et al. (2023) proposed an FE model for analyzing flexible pipes with localized damage in the outer layers. The fundamental concepts of deep learning, including convolutional neural networks, were discussed by Jafari et al. (2020). Additionally, they introduced the use of deep learning methods for preventing pipeline damage through early detection. The results indicated that such an approach can identify damages in the early stages. Gresil et al. (2017) investigated the application of guided wave excitation and damage detection in composite pipes using piezoelectric sensors. They also examined the use of a guided wave-based structural health monitoring method using ultrasonic guided waves. Furthermore, Buethe et al. (2013) presented an approach for structural health monitoring using guided waves in pipe structures, thereby addressing challenges in pattern recognition for damage detection. An algorithm for structural health monitoring of subsea pipeline systems was developed by Bao et al. (2013).
Structural health monitoring is a crucial process in structural engineering that helps prevent structural failure and reduces operational costs. In this regard, various methods for structural health monitoring have been proposed by researchers (Farrar and Worden, 2007). One of the most popular structural health monitoring methods is vibration-based damage detection, which has attracted researchers' attention due to its numerous advantages (Das et al., 2016; Peeters et al., 2001; Saadatmorad et al., 2021). An important advantage of vibration-based methods is their ability to provide global testing. These methods are also cost-effective. In vibration-based tests, the global data of the structure are obtained using numerical or experimental modal analysis. These data are then used in damage identification methods to determine the location and sometimes the severity of the damage (Hou and Xia, 2021; Doebling et al., 1998).
Generally, vibration-based damage detection methods are divided into two main categories: frequency-based damage and mode-shape-based damage detection methods (Khatir et al., 2021). Yang and Wang (2010) investigated the detection of structural damages using natural frequencies. In their work, they introduced an assurance criterion for the natural frequency vector to detect damages in an eight-story structure. By applying this criterion, they were able to successfully identify the location and severity of the damage with high accuracy. A new damage identification formula was introduced by Sotoudehnia et al. (2019). Similarly, Sha et al. (2019) proposed a new damage detection method based on changes in relative natural frequencies for detecting damages in beam structures. The effectiveness of the proposed method in identifying and quantifying damages in beams was demonstrated. To detect the location of damages in beam structures, Seguini et al. (2022) used natural frequencies as input for an artificial neural network. Saadatmorad et al. (2024b) applied the covariance of vibrational mode shape to the continuous wavelet transform to detect damages in beams that were reinforced with nanoparticles.
Furthermore, Pandey et al. (1991) used the derivative of the vibration mode shapes and the curvature of mode shapes for detecting damage in simply supported and cantilever beams. Their method demonstrated effective performance in detecting damages in beams. Wahab and De Roeck (1999) used the derivative of mode shapes in beam and bridge structures to detect damages. Their approach demonstrated high performance in numerical and experimental damage detection scenarios. In their study, Nguyen (2014) used a mode-shape analysis approach to detect cracks in beam structures, concluding that projections of the mode shapes on normal planes served as a good damage detection index. Saadatmorad et al. (2022) proposed a novel damage index called the "Pearson correlation function of mode shapes" to detect cracks in steel beams. Their experimental and numerical results demonstrated the method's effectiveness in identifying the scracks. Nahvi and Jabbari (2005) demonstrated that crack damages tended to disappear when they are located at mode-shape nodes; nevertheless, damage detection based on mode shapes can still be accomplished with high accuracy.
As shown in the literature, damage detection methods based on mode shapes are superior to those based on natural frequency. This is because mode shapes are generally more sensitive to local damage while detecting damage using natural frequencies requires acquiring data from multiple damaged states of the considered structure (Saadatmorad et al., 2024a; Carden and Fanning, 2004).
A review of published studies indicates that, despite the widespread applications of fluid-conveying pipes, damage detection in these structures has not yet been extensively explored. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to fill this research gap. The novelty of the present work lies in suggesting a signal reconstruction-based algorithm called "matching pursuit (MP)" for detecting damages in fluid-conveying pipes. Typically, this algorithm is employed to reconstruct the signal or its approximation. However, this article proposes a novel approach by using the residuals generated from the approximation as effective indicators for identifying damage and errors in the signal. The foundation of this paper rests on the principle that high-frequency components within the signal can be detected in the residuals produced by the optimal atom in the MP algorithm. Initially, we modeled pipe conveying fluid on a Pasternak foundation, and its kinetic and potential energies were obtained. Then, using Hamilton's principle, the governing differential equation for the pipe's deformation was derived. These equations were solved using the FE method, along with the Galerkin method. The computed results were compared with existing results to verify their validity. After this verification, a novel structural damage detection method based on the MP algorithm was proposed for detecting damages in fluid-conveying pipe structures. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed damage detection method was evaluated numerically and experimentally.
2 Mathematical modeling
Consider the elastic pipe shown in Figure 1, which is placed on a Pasternak foundation. The pipe has a length L, an internal diameter d, an outer diameter D, Young's modulus E, and a second moment of area I. An incompressible fluid with a constant velocity V flows inside the pipe. The elastic stiffness and shear layer stiffness of the Pasternak foundation are denoted by kf and ks, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the origin of the coordinate system is located at the left end of the pipe.
The kinetic energy of the system consists of two parts that are related to the kinetic energy of the pipe and the fluid, respectively. The kinetic energy of the pipe can be expressed as follows:
$$T_p=\frac{1}{2} \rho_p A_p \int_0^L\left(\frac{\partial w(x, t)}{\partial t}\right)^2 \mathrm{~d} x$$ (1) The kinetic energy of the fluid is also calculated as follows:
$$T_f=\frac{1}{2} \rho_f A_f \int_0^L\left(\left(V \frac{\partial w(x, t)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial w(x, t)}{\partial t}\right)^2+V^2\right) \mathrm{d} x$$ (2) In Eqs. (1) and (2), A and ρ are the area of cross-section and density, respectively; the subscripts p and f stand for the pipe and fluid, respectively; L is the length of the pipe; w (x, t) represents the transverse displacement of the pipe at position x and time t; and V is the constant velocity of the fluid. Thus, the total kinetic energy of the system, which includes the kinetic energy of the pipe and the fluid, can be expressed as follows (Liang et al., 2018):
$$\begin{aligned} T= & \frac{1}{2} \int_0^L \rho_p A_p\left(\frac{\partial w(x, t)}{\partial t}\right)^2 \mathrm{~d} x+ \\ & \frac{1}{2} \int_0^L \rho_f A_f\left(\left(\left(V \frac{\partial w(x, t)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial w(x, t)}{\partial t}\right)^2+V^2\right)\right) \mathrm{d} x\end{aligned}$$ (3) The strain energy of the pipe and foundation is expressed as follows (Yu et al., 2017; Jafari-Talookolaei and Ahmadian, 2007; Lee and Chung, 2002):
$$U=\frac{1}{2} \int_0^L E I\left(\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial x^2}\right)^2 \mathrm{~d} x+\frac{1}{2} \int_0^L\left(k_f w^2+k_s\left(\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}\right)^2\right) \mathrm{d} x$$ (4) The governing equation of motion for the free vibration of the considered tube was derived using Hamilton's principle as applied to a conservative system. The principle can be written as
$$\int_{t_1}^{t_2}(\delta T-\delta U) \mathrm{d} t=0$$ (5) where t1 and t2 are two specified times, and δ denotes the first variation. Substituting Eqs. (3) and (4) into Eq. (5), and performing the first variation yields the following partial differential equation:
$$\begin{aligned} E I w_{, x x x x} & +\rho_f A_f V^2 w_{, x x}+2 \rho_f A_f V w_{, x t}+\left(\rho_p A_p+\rho_f A_f\right) w_{, t t} \\ & +k_f w-k_s w_{, x x}=0\end{aligned}$$ (6) In this equation and in the following ones, a comma denotes differentiation with respect to the variable that immediately follows it.
3 Solution method
In the present work, the FE method was used, along with the Galerkin weighted residual method, to solve Eq. (6). A higher-order pipe element with length Le, shown in Figure 2, was used in this study, which included two end nodes and one middle node. Each node contains two degrees of freedom of vertical displacement w and slope w, x. Therefore, each element has six degrees of freedom. Thus, the degrees of freedom vector of an element are stated as follows:
$$\boldsymbol{d}_{\boldsymbol{e}}=\left\{w_1, w_{1, x}, w_2, w_{2, x}, w_3, w_{3, x}\right\}^{\mathrm{T}}$$ (7) The deflection of the pipe can be interpolated as follows:
$$w=\boldsymbol{Nd}_\boldsymbol{e}$$ (8) in which
$$\boldsymbol{N}=\left[\begin{array}{llllll}H_1 & \bar{H}_1 & H_2 & \bar{H}_2 & H_3 & \bar{H}_3\end{array}\right]$$ (9) and Hi and Hi (i=1, 2, 3) are the Hermite interpolation functions (Logan, 2011). Based on the Galerkin method, we have (Logan, 2011) the following:
$$\iiint R W \mathrm{~d} x=0$$ (10) where R is a weighted residual, and W is a weight function. Notably, for the Galerkin method used in the FE analysis, the weight function is the same as the shape function. By applying the Galerkin method to Eq. 6, we have the following:
$$\begin{aligned} & \int_0^{L_e}\left[E I w_{, x x x x}+\rho_f A_f V^2 w_{, x x}+2 \rho_f A_f V w_{, x t}+\right. \\ & \left.\quad\left(\rho_p A_p+\rho_f A_f\right) w_{, t t}+k_f w+k_s w_{, x x}\right] N_i L_e \mathrm{~d} \xi=0\end{aligned}$$ (11) where $N_i=\left(H_1, \bar{H}_1, H_2, \bar{H}_2, H_3, \bar{H}_3\right)$. By using the integral by parts and writing the equations in weak form, the mass, damping, and stiffness matrices of an element can be calculated as follows:
$$\boldsymbol{M}_\boldsymbol{e}=\left(\rho_p A_p+\rho_f A_f\right) \int_0^1 \boldsymbol{N}^{\mathrm{T}} \boldsymbol{N} L_e \mathrm{~d} \xi$$ (12) $$\boldsymbol{C}_{\boldsymbol{e}}=\rho_f A_f V \int_0^1\left(\boldsymbol{N}_{, x}^{\mathrm{T}} \boldsymbol{N}+\boldsymbol{N}^{\mathrm{T}} \boldsymbol{N}_{, x}\right) L_e \mathrm{~d} \xi$$ (13) $$\begin{aligned} \boldsymbol{K}_{\boldsymbol{e}}= & E I \int_0^1 \boldsymbol{N}_{, x x}^{\mathrm{T}} \boldsymbol{N}_{, x x} L_e \mathrm{~d} \xi+\rho_f A_f V^2 \int_0^1 \boldsymbol{N}_{, x}^{\mathrm{T}} \boldsymbol{N}_{, x} L_e \mathrm{~d} \xi \\ & +k_f \int_0^1 \boldsymbol{N}^{\mathrm{T}} \boldsymbol{N} L_e \mathrm{~d} \xi+k_s \int_0^1 \boldsymbol{N}_{, x}^{\mathrm{T}} \boldsymbol{N}_{, x} L_e \mathrm{~d} \xi\end{aligned}$$ (14) where ξ = x/Le represents the intrinsic coordinate of an element. Eventually, by assembling the equations of different elements, the final equations can be written in the following form:
$$\boldsymbol{M} \ddot{\varDelta}+\boldsymbol{C} \dot{\varDelta}+\boldsymbol{K} \varDelta=0$$ (15) where (K, C, M) are the total mass, damping, and stiffness matrices, respectively. Furthermore, $(\ddot{\varDelta}, \dot{\varDelta}, \varDelta)$ are the acceleration, velocity, and degrees of freedom vectors of the pipe, respectively. The eigenvalues of the system can be computed by working out Eq. (15). Assuming the response to be in the form $\varDelta=\underline{\varDelta} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \omega t}$ and substituting it into Eq. (15) and removing the termeiωt, we will have the following:
$$\left(\boldsymbol{K}+\omega \boldsymbol{C}-\omega^2 \boldsymbol{M}\right) \underline{\varDelta}=0$$ (16) in which i is the imaginary variable, $\underline{\varDelta}$ is the amplitude of vibration, and ω is the frequency of the system. The above equation has been solved using MATLAB software, and the frequencies and mode shapes, i.e. $\underline{\varDelta}$, have been calculated.
4 Methodology
In this study, a novel mode shape-based damage detection method is proposed, which uses the MP algorithm (Mallat and Zhang, 1993) to detect damages in the pipes conveying fluid on the Pasternak foundation. The MP algorithm is commonly used to approximate or reconstruct a signal. Notably, damage can be detected through the residual obtained from the difference between the original signal and the signal approximated or reconstructed by the MP algorithm. The probability of detecting damage in the residual obtained from the MP algorithm is high, because damage in the pipe conveying fluid manifests as a high-frequency disturbance that is not visible in the mode shapes. The flowchart of our proposed methodology is shown in Figure 3.
Consider a discrete signal S [j] as follows (Mallat and Zhang, 1993; Chakraborty et al., 2009; Wang and Sun, 2019):
$$S[j]=\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty} \alpha_i f_i[j]$$ (17) where j is the sampling point number (node number), fi[j] is the basis function selected from the dictionary D at the ith iteration of the MP, and αi is the corresponding expansion coefficient.
The energy of the signal can be represented by the following equation (Mallat and Zhang, 1993):
$$E_{[j]}=\left(\|S\|_2\right)^2 \triangleq \sum\limits_{j=-\infty}^{+\infty}|S[j]|^2$$ (18) After n iterations, the result can be shown to converge as follows:
$$\lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|S[j]-\sum\limits_{i=0}^{n-1} \alpha_i f_i[j]\right\|_2=0$$ (19) The signal can be defined using Eq. 20 (Mallat and Zhang, 1993):
$$S[j]=\sum\limits_{i=0}^{n-1} \alpha_i f_i[j]+R_n[j]$$ (20) where Rn[j] is the residual signal after n iterations. The steps of the MP algorithm are presented as follows:
By setting R0[j] = S[j], in ith iteration, i = 0, 1, ⋯, n − 1, the residual Ri[j] is computed on each dictionary atom f d[j] ∈ D until the following is obtained:
$$\varPsi_i^{(d)}=\left\langle R_i, f^{(d)}\right\rangle \triangleq \sum\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} R_i[j] f^{(d)} \times j \mathrm{~d} j$$ (21) The atom fi[j] selected from the dictionary is an atom that has the highest inner product value with the following residual:
$$f_i[j]=\operatorname{argmax}\left|\varPsi_i^{(d)}\right|$$ (22) The corresponding coefficients are written as follows (Mallat and Zhang, 1993):
$$\alpha_i=\left\langle R_i, f_i\right\rangle=\sum\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} R_i[j] f_i[j] \mathrm{d} j$$ (23) The residual in the (i+1)th iteration can be calculated as:
$$R_{i+1}[j]=R_i[j]-a_i f_i[j]$$ (24) Thus, after n iterations of MP, the residual can be expressed as follows:
$$R_n[j]=R_{n-1}[j]-\alpha_{n-1} f_{n-1}[j]=S[j]-\sum\limits_{i=0}^{n-1} \alpha_i f_i[j]$$ (25) As shown in Table 1, the MP algorithm is a method to approximate a signal via a dictionary of functions. This algorithm operates iteratively to select the optimal function in the dictionary that best matches the residual signal at each step. The functions in the dictionary typically have waveforms. The most commonly used dictionaries are Gabor atoms, Fourier basis functions, and wavelet functions. At the first iteration, the first residual is the original signal. The algorithm iteratively selects the atom from the dictionary that is most similar to the current residual. This similarity is often measured using the inner product between the residual and each dictionary atom. The atom with the highest inner product is selected. After satisfying the stopping criterion, the final approximation of the signal is obtained by summing up all the selected atoms and their corresponding scaling coefficients.
Table 1 Matching pursuit algorithmInputs of MP: Signal: S [j] Dictionary: D Output: List of coefficients $\left(a_i\right)_{i=1}^n$ and indices for corresponding atoms Ψi(d) start: $R_1=S[j]; \quad i=1;$ Repeat: Find fi [j] ∈ D with maximum inner product $\left|\left\langle R_i, f^d\right\rangle\right|$; $a_i=\left\langle R_i, f_i\right\rangle$ $R_{i+1}=R_i-a_i f_{\varPsi_i}$; i = i + 1; Stop condition (for example: $\left\|R_n\right\|$ < threshold) Return 5 Weak matching pursuit
In the weak matching pursuit (WMP), the atom selection criterion is limited to a maximum value of inner multiplication less than one to have a computationally efficient method. This criterion is applied as follows:
$$\left|\left\langle S, f_k\right\rangle\right| \geqslant \beta \max \left|\left\langle S, f_i\right\rangle\right|, \quad \beta \in(0, 1]$$ (26) The MP for the weak condition is stated in Table 2.
Table 2 Weak matching pursuit algorithmInputs of MP: Signal: S [j ] Dictionary: D Output: List of coefficients $\left(a_i\right)_{i=1}^n$ and indices for corresponding atoms Ψi(d). start: $R_1=S[j]; \quad i=1$; Repeat: Find $f_i[j] \in D$ with maximum inner product $\left|\left\langle R_i, f^d\right\rangle\right|$; While β ∈ (0, 1] do $\beta^* \max \left|\left\langle R_i, f_{\varPsi_i}\right\rangle\right|$ $a_i=\left\langle R_i, f_i\right\rangle$; Ri + 1 = Ri − aifi; i = i + 1; Stop condition (for example: $\left\|R_n\right\|$ < threshold) Return 6 Results
The results of the current study are presented in this section. First, we verified the accuracy of the present modeling in Subsection 6.1. Then, in Subsection 6.2, we investigated numerical damage detection using six different numerical damage scenarios. After that, we analyzed the effect of noise on the damage indexes in Subsection 6.3. Finally, Subsection 6.4 presents the results of the experimental evaluations.
6.1 Comparison study
In this section, the calculated natural frequencies were compared with other references. We assume that the fluid velocity is zero. The natural frequencies are presented in dimensionless form. Here, results reported in three references (Liang et al., 2018; Ni et al., 2011; Thomson, 1993) were compared with the results of the present study. Table 3 shows the first four dimensionless natural frequencies $\left(\bar{\omega}=\frac{\omega L^2}{\sqrt{\frac{E I}{m_p+m_f}}}\right)$ of the tube with different ditions and V = 0. As shown in this table, the results are in good agreement with the results reported in the literature (Liang et al., 2018; Ni et al., 2011; Thomson, 1993).
Table 3 Dimensionless natural frequencies of pipes with different boundary conditions and V = 0Boundary conditions Method Number of elements ω1 ω2 ω3 ω4 Simple-Simple Present 20 9.869 39.628 87.184 159.214 25 9.869 39.628 87.186 159.211 30 9.869 39.628 87.188 159.209 35 9.869 39.628 87.188 159.208 40 9.869 39.628 87.188 159.208 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 9.869 39.478 88.826 157.906 Thomson (1993) 9.869 39.478 88.826 157.906 Liang et al. (2018) 9.869 39.478 88.826 157.906 Clamped-Clamped Present 20 22.373 62.014 122.195 200.308 25 22.373 62.009 122.176 200.299 30 22.373 62.014 122.195 200.308 35 22.373 62.003 122.195 200.290 40 22.373 62.003 122.195 200.290 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 22.373 61.672 120.903 199.840 Thomson (1993) 22.373 61.672 120.903 199.840 Liang et al. (2018) 22.373 61.672 120.903 199.840 Simple-Clamped Present 20 15.418 2 50.128 6 105.162 7 167.802 2 25 15.418 50.127 5 105.155 1 167.900 0 30 15.418 50.126 8 105.149 6 167.966 6 35 15.418 50.126 105.146 167.015 40 15.418 50.126 105.146 167.015 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 15.418 49.964 104.247 178.264 Thomson (1993) 15.418 49.964 104.247 178.264 Liang et al. (2018) 15.418 49.964 104.247 178.264 Clamped-Free Present 20 3.509 21.661 61.888 118.674 25 3.511 21.658 61.917 118.650 30 3.512 21.655 61.935 121.957 35 3.513 21.654 61.948 121.977 40 3.513 21.654 61.948 121.997 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 3.516 22.034 61.935 120.901 Thomson (1993) 3.516 22.034 61.935 120.901 Liang et al. (2018) 3.516 22.034 61.935 120.901 6.2 Numerical damage detection
In most studies, the MP algorithms aim to find the bestmatched signal from the original signal. However, in the current study, our aim is to find the best residual using an MP algorithm to detect the location of damages in pipes carrying fluids. Thus, we used the mode shapes of a pipe with the properties listed in Table 4 to evaluate the numerical performance of the proposed MP algorithm. The mode shapes were obtained based on the FE modeling suggested in Section 2 and verified in subsection 3.1. In this method, the atom is the high-frequency component, and the residual represents the low-frequency component.
Table 4 Main properties of the considered pipe conveying fluidProperty Symbol Value Total length of pipe (m) L 10 Outer diameter (m) D 0.25 Internal diameter (m) d 0.125 Moment of area (m4) I $\frac{\pi}{64}\left(D^4-d^4\right)$ Area of the pipe (m2) Ap $\frac{\pi}{4}\left(D^2-d^2\right)$ Area of the fluid (m2) Af $\frac{\pi}{4 d^2}$ Young's modulus (GN/m2) E 210 Density of pipe (kg/m3) ρp 8 700 Density of fluid (kg/m3) ρf 870 Mass of pipe (kg) mp ρpApL Mass of fluid (kg/m3) mf ρf Af The atom approximates the signal, and the damage locations are predicted in the residual. In other words, the proposed methodology suggests that instead of using MP for reconstructing the original signal, it can be used as a decomposition tool for damage detection. As shown in Table 5, 10 different damage scenarios are considered to examine the numerical performance of the proposed methodology.
Table 5 Eight damage scenarios considered in this studyDamage scenario Damage location Damage level ks (kN) kf (N/m2) V (m/s) Boundary conditions 1 10 5% 0 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 2 20 3% 0 0 0 Simple-Clamped 3 76 1% 0 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 4 50 5% 0 0 0 Simple-Clamped 5 90 3% 0 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 6 42 1% 0 0 0 Simple-Clamped 7 90 3% 108 106 1.5 Clamped-Clamped 8 50 1% 0 0 1.5 Simple-Clamped 9 76 1% 0 106 0 Clamped-Clamped 10 20 3% 108 0 0 Simple-Clamped The obtained mode shapes corresponding to the first six numerical damage scenarios are shown in Figure 4. As shown in the figure, detecting damages in most mode shapes is difficult or nearly impossible. Thus, we apply the proposed MP method. Figure 5 compares the damaged mode shapes with the approximation provided by the proposed MP method. Finally, Figure 6 indicates the residuals obtained from the proposed MP method. Evidently, the original signals (mode shapes) in all damage scenarios are well-fitted with the signals approximated by the MP method. This finding shows that the proposed method accurately processes the original signal. As shown in Figure 6, even at low damage percentages at different damage positions, the proposed MP method can accurately detect damage locations in the pipe as a break in the residual signals. Therefore, the suggested method is an effective numerical tool to identify the damages in the mode shapes of the pipe.
Figure 6 shows the results of damage detection for static fluid without the elastic foundation and Pasternak foundation. Furthermore, eight different damage scenarios with varying speeds and different values of ks and k f were considered to examine the numerical performance of the proposed methodology. The results are shown in Table 6.
Table 6 Eight damage scenarios considered in this studyDamage scenario Damage location Damage level ks (kN) kf (N/m2) V (m/s) Boundary conditions 1 90 3% 108 0 0 Simple-Clamped 2 76 1% 106 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 3 20 3% 0 104 0 Simple-Clamped 4 76 1% 0 106 0 Clamped-Clamped 5 90 3% 0 0 1.5 Clamped-Clamped 6 42 1% 0 0 3 Simple-Clamped 7 90 3% 108 106 1.5 Clamped-Clamped 8 20 3% 1010 104 0.3 Simple-Clamped As shown in Figure 7, the original signals in all damage scenarios are fitted with the signals approximated by the MP method. The approximated signals from the matching follow-up method are also shown. Figure 8 presents the residual signals and the results of damage detection. As shown in Figure 8, the proposed MP method can detect damage locations with high accuracy, even at low damage percentages at different damage positions.
As shown by the examined damage scenarios, the WMP algorithm can detect damages in all damage scenarios considered in Table 6 (for damages with different severities, in different positions, and with different boundary conditions of the pipe). In the next section, we investigated the effect of noise in the mode shape on the accuracy of damage identification with the proposed WMP.
6.3 Effect of noise on the damage indexes
Due to the noises introduced in operational conditions, the performance of the proposed damage indicators in noisy conditions was examined in four separate scenarios in this section, as shown in Table 5 (Scenarios 7–10). Furthermore, the data were intentionally contaminated with random noise generated by MATLAB, with an intensity of 0.01%. The results obtained for Scenarios 7–10 are shown in Figures 9 and 10. In Figure 9, the original noisy signals in all damage scenarios are well-fitted with the signals approximated by the matching method. In Figure 10, we can see that despite the low damage level at different damage positions, the proposed MP method can detect the damage locations in the pipe as a break in the residual noise signals with high accuracy.
Figure 9 shows the quality of approximating the mode shapes related to Scenarios 7– 10 by the WMP algorithm. The difference between these mode shapes and approximations created by the WMP algorithm is called the "residual", which we proposed as a damage identification index in this paper. The residuals corresponding to damage Scenarios 7–10 are shown in Figure 10. By comparing the results in Figures 9 and 10, we can see that the better the approximation of the signal, the higher the accuracy of damage identification in the residuals.
6.4 Experimental damage detection
In this section, we validated the method presented in operational conditions using modal testing. Figure 11 shows the steps of measuring and applying damage on the steel 304 pipe for the modal test. To conduct the modal test, the pipe-carrying fluid was suspended using two soft strings. As shown in Figure 12, the pipe was divided into 20 segments. Next, to measure acceleration, two one-way piezoelectric accelerometers were installed at points 3 and 12 of the structure. The accelerometer remained fixed at both points. A modal impact hammer equipped with a force gauge was used to apply force to the structure, which was done at all points by moving the hammer along the pipe. Subsequently, the analyzer was used to calculate the force and acceleration signals and obtain the frequency response functions.
Figure 13 shows the laboratory equipment and the test setup, while Figure 14 presents the experimental setup and its different components.
Finally, the obtained frequency response functions were analyzed. The natural frequencies and damping coefficients are reported in Table 7.
Table 7 Natural frequencies and damping coefficients of steel pipe carrying fluidMode number 1 2 3 Natural frequency (Hz) 662.20 1 295.90 2 362.41 Damping ratio 4.74 2.13 1.94 The data for the normalized mode shapes of the steel 304 pipe carrying water are presented in Table 7. Eventually, we tested our proposed damage detection methodology for localizing damage in the pipe with the experimental first mode shape. Figure 15 compares the original signal and the approximated signal using the weak MP tracking algorithm. Figure 16 shows the residual obtained from the proposed MP method. As can be seen, the original signal (first mode shape) is well-fitted with the signal approximated by the proposed MP method. This shows that the proposed method processes the original signal correctly. Furthermore, as seen in Figure 16, the proposed MP algorithm detects the location of damage with high accuracy, even with few experimental sampling data.
Table 8 Normalized mode shapes of the steel pipe carrying fluidNode number Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 1 −0.267 0 −0.563 5 0.367 6 2 −0.254 6 0.596 0 0.125 0 3 −0.142 3 0.131 4 0.133 5 4 −0.105 7 0.203 8 0.710 1 5 −0.352 6 0.276 5 0.215 6 6 0.724 6 0.319 0 0.995 1 7 0.131 8 0.423 5 0.514 3 8 0.182 1 0.286 4 −0.732 9 9 0.241 1 0.158 0 −0.980 5 10 0.313 9 0.117 1 −0.414 8 11 0.313 4 0.113 7 −0.407 4 12 0.362 3 −0.105 8 −0.118 3 13 0.319 3 −0.159 8 −0.721 2 14 0.304 5 −0.236 3 −0.614 6 15 0.268 1 −0.242 0 0.218 8 16 0.226 1 −0.286 1 0.118 0 17 0.182 6 −0.303 1 0.307 9 18 0.104 3 −0.271 6 0.148 9 19 −0.325 2 −0.161 0 0.389 1 20 −0.107 9 −0.327 9 0.425 0 7 Conclusions
In this study, numerical and experimental approaches were presented to identify damage in fluid-conveying pipes, which are critical components in various engineering applications, such as oil and gas transportation, water supply systems, and chemical processing. Maintaining the structural integrity of these pipes is crucial, because any damage can result in leaks, reduced efficiency, and catastrophic failures. The dynamic behavior of fluid-conveying pipes is influenced by several factors, including pipe material properties, fluid flow velocity, and external support conditions, such as those provided by a Pasternak foundation. In this study, the governing equation for the pipe supported by a Pasternak foundation is derived based on the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, and the response is calculated using the finite element method.
This study introduces the potential of a signal approximation algorithm called the MP method for detecting damage and demonstrates its efficacy in accurately locating damage under varying conditions. The damage index proposed in this study is based on the difference between the mode shape of the pipe structure and the approximation signal obtained from the MP algorithm (i. e., the residual signal). This innovative approach enhances traditional damage detection methods by providing a more sensitive and reliable method of monitoring pipe integrity.
Our findings reveal that the MP algorithm effectively identifies damage regardless of boundary conditions, varying damage intensities, and the proximity of damage to support. Given the widespread use of fluid-carrying pipes across various industries, ensuring reliable damage detection in these structures is critical. In the current study, the combination of theoretical modeling and experimental validation enhanced the credibility of the results, making it a robust tool for engineers and researchers in the field. Furthermore, this study provides a robust foundation for future research, serving as a benchmark for further investigations into the dynamic behavior of fluid-carrying pipes and the application of the MP algorithm for signal analysis and damage detection.
Competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. -
Table 1 Matching pursuit algorithm
Inputs of MP: Signal: S [j] Dictionary: D Output: List of coefficients $\left(a_i\right)_{i=1}^n$ and indices for corresponding atoms Ψi(d) start: $R_1=S[j]; \quad i=1;$ Repeat: Find fi [j] ∈ D with maximum inner product $\left|\left\langle R_i, f^d\right\rangle\right|$; $a_i=\left\langle R_i, f_i\right\rangle$ $R_{i+1}=R_i-a_i f_{\varPsi_i}$; i = i + 1; Stop condition (for example: $\left\|R_n\right\|$ < threshold) Return Table 2 Weak matching pursuit algorithm
Inputs of MP: Signal: S [j ] Dictionary: D Output: List of coefficients $\left(a_i\right)_{i=1}^n$ and indices for corresponding atoms Ψi(d). start: $R_1=S[j]; \quad i=1$; Repeat: Find $f_i[j] \in D$ with maximum inner product $\left|\left\langle R_i, f^d\right\rangle\right|$; While β ∈ (0, 1] do $\beta^* \max \left|\left\langle R_i, f_{\varPsi_i}\right\rangle\right|$ $a_i=\left\langle R_i, f_i\right\rangle$; Ri + 1 = Ri − aifi; i = i + 1; Stop condition (for example: $\left\|R_n\right\|$ < threshold) Return Table 3 Dimensionless natural frequencies of pipes with different boundary conditions and V = 0
Boundary conditions Method Number of elements ω1 ω2 ω3 ω4 Simple-Simple Present 20 9.869 39.628 87.184 159.214 25 9.869 39.628 87.186 159.211 30 9.869 39.628 87.188 159.209 35 9.869 39.628 87.188 159.208 40 9.869 39.628 87.188 159.208 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 9.869 39.478 88.826 157.906 Thomson (1993) 9.869 39.478 88.826 157.906 Liang et al. (2018) 9.869 39.478 88.826 157.906 Clamped-Clamped Present 20 22.373 62.014 122.195 200.308 25 22.373 62.009 122.176 200.299 30 22.373 62.014 122.195 200.308 35 22.373 62.003 122.195 200.290 40 22.373 62.003 122.195 200.290 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 22.373 61.672 120.903 199.840 Thomson (1993) 22.373 61.672 120.903 199.840 Liang et al. (2018) 22.373 61.672 120.903 199.840 Simple-Clamped Present 20 15.418 2 50.128 6 105.162 7 167.802 2 25 15.418 50.127 5 105.155 1 167.900 0 30 15.418 50.126 8 105.149 6 167.966 6 35 15.418 50.126 105.146 167.015 40 15.418 50.126 105.146 167.015 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 15.418 49.964 104.247 178.264 Thomson (1993) 15.418 49.964 104.247 178.264 Liang et al. (2018) 15.418 49.964 104.247 178.264 Clamped-Free Present 20 3.509 21.661 61.888 118.674 25 3.511 21.658 61.917 118.650 30 3.512 21.655 61.935 121.957 35 3.513 21.654 61.948 121.977 40 3.513 21.654 61.948 121.997 Literature Ni et al. (2011) 3.516 22.034 61.935 120.901 Thomson (1993) 3.516 22.034 61.935 120.901 Liang et al. (2018) 3.516 22.034 61.935 120.901 Table 4 Main properties of the considered pipe conveying fluid
Property Symbol Value Total length of pipe (m) L 10 Outer diameter (m) D 0.25 Internal diameter (m) d 0.125 Moment of area (m4) I $\frac{\pi}{64}\left(D^4-d^4\right)$ Area of the pipe (m2) Ap $\frac{\pi}{4}\left(D^2-d^2\right)$ Area of the fluid (m2) Af $\frac{\pi}{4 d^2}$ Young's modulus (GN/m2) E 210 Density of pipe (kg/m3) ρp 8 700 Density of fluid (kg/m3) ρf 870 Mass of pipe (kg) mp ρpApL Mass of fluid (kg/m3) mf ρf Af Table 5 Eight damage scenarios considered in this study
Damage scenario Damage location Damage level ks (kN) kf (N/m2) V (m/s) Boundary conditions 1 10 5% 0 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 2 20 3% 0 0 0 Simple-Clamped 3 76 1% 0 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 4 50 5% 0 0 0 Simple-Clamped 5 90 3% 0 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 6 42 1% 0 0 0 Simple-Clamped 7 90 3% 108 106 1.5 Clamped-Clamped 8 50 1% 0 0 1.5 Simple-Clamped 9 76 1% 0 106 0 Clamped-Clamped 10 20 3% 108 0 0 Simple-Clamped Table 6 Eight damage scenarios considered in this study
Damage scenario Damage location Damage level ks (kN) kf (N/m2) V (m/s) Boundary conditions 1 90 3% 108 0 0 Simple-Clamped 2 76 1% 106 0 0 Clamped-Clamped 3 20 3% 0 104 0 Simple-Clamped 4 76 1% 0 106 0 Clamped-Clamped 5 90 3% 0 0 1.5 Clamped-Clamped 6 42 1% 0 0 3 Simple-Clamped 7 90 3% 108 106 1.5 Clamped-Clamped 8 20 3% 1010 104 0.3 Simple-Clamped Table 7 Natural frequencies and damping coefficients of steel pipe carrying fluid
Mode number 1 2 3 Natural frequency (Hz) 662.20 1 295.90 2 362.41 Damping ratio 4.74 2.13 1.94 Table 8 Normalized mode shapes of the steel pipe carrying fluid
Node number Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 1 −0.267 0 −0.563 5 0.367 6 2 −0.254 6 0.596 0 0.125 0 3 −0.142 3 0.131 4 0.133 5 4 −0.105 7 0.203 8 0.710 1 5 −0.352 6 0.276 5 0.215 6 6 0.724 6 0.319 0 0.995 1 7 0.131 8 0.423 5 0.514 3 8 0.182 1 0.286 4 −0.732 9 9 0.241 1 0.158 0 −0.980 5 10 0.313 9 0.117 1 −0.414 8 11 0.313 4 0.113 7 −0.407 4 12 0.362 3 −0.105 8 −0.118 3 13 0.319 3 −0.159 8 −0.721 2 14 0.304 5 −0.236 3 −0.614 6 15 0.268 1 −0.242 0 0.218 8 16 0.226 1 −0.286 1 0.118 0 17 0.182 6 −0.303 1 0.307 9 18 0.104 3 −0.271 6 0.148 9 19 −0.325 2 −0.161 0 0.389 1 20 −0.107 9 −0.327 9 0.425 0 -
Anand V (2015) Entropy generation analysis of laminar flow of a nanofluid in a circular tube immersed in an isothermal external fluid. Energ. 93: 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.019 Ashley H, Haviland G (1950) Bending vibrations of a pipe line containing flowing fluid. J. Appl. Mech. 17(3): 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010447 Bao C, Hao H, Li ZX (2013) Integrated ARMA model method for damage detection of subsea pipeline system. Eng. Struct. 48: 176192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.033 Belabed Z, Tounsi A, Al-Osta MA, Tounsi A, Minh HL (2024) On the elastic stability and free vibration responses of functionally graded porous beams resting on Winkler-Pasternak foundations via finite element computation. Geomech. & Eng. 36(2): 183. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2024.36.2.183 Benjamin TB (1962) Dynamics of a system of articulated pipes conveying fluid-Ⅰ. Theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 261(1307): 457486. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1961.0090 Benjamin TB, Batchelor GK (1961) Dynamics of a system of articulated pipes conveying fluid-Ⅱ. Experiments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 261(1307): 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1961.0091 Bouafia K, Selim MM, Bourada F, Bousahla AA, Bourada M, Tounsi A, Tounsi A (2021) Bending and free vibration characteristics of various compositions of FG plates on elastic foundation via quasi 3D HSDT model. Steel & Compos. Struct. 41(4): 487–503. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.41.4.487 Bounouara F, Sadoun M, Saleh MMS, Chikh A, Bousahla AA, Kaci A, Bourada F, Tounsi A, Tounsi A (2023) Effect of visco-Pasternak foundation on thermo-mechanical bending response of anisotropic thick laminated composite plates. Steel Compos. Struct. 47(6): 693–707. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2023.47.6.693 Buethe I, Torres-Arredondo MA, Mujica Delgado LE, Rodellar Benedé J, Fritzen CP (2013) Damage detection in piping systems using pattern recognition techniques. In Proceedings 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring & 1st European Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, Dresden, Germany, 1–8 Carden EP, Fanning P (2004) Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. Struct. Healt. Monit. 3(4): 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921704047500 Chakraborty D, Kovvali N, Wei J, Papandreou-Suppappola A, Cochran D, Chattopadhyay A (2009) Damage classification structural health monitoring in bolted structures using time-frequency techniques. J. Intell. Mater. Sys. & Struct. 20(11): 1289–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X08100044 Chatzopoulou G, Karamanos SA, Varelis GE (2016) Finite element analysis of cyclically-loaded steel pipes during deep water reeling installation. Ocean Eng. 124: 113–124 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.07.048 Chellapilla KR, Simha HS (2007) Critical velocity of fluid-conveying pipes resting on two-parameter foundation. J. Sound Vib. 302(1–2): 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.11.007 Chu CL, Lin YH (1995) Finite element analysis of fluid-conveying timoshenko pipes. Shock Vib. 2(3): 247–255. https://doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1995-2306 Das S, Saha P, Patro SK (2016) Vibration-based damage detection techniques used for health monitoring of structures: a review. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 6: 477–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0168-5 Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB (1998) A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib. Digest 30(2): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000201 El-Sayed TA, El-Mongy HH (2019) Free vibration and stability analysis of a multi-span pipe conveying fluid using exact and variational iteration methods combined with transfer matrix method. Appl. Math. Model. 71: 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.02.006 Farrar CR, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 365(1851): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928 Fu G, Tuo Y, Zhang H, Su J, Sun B, Wang K, Lou M (2023) Effects of material characteristics on nonlinear dynamics of viscoelastic axially functionally graded material pipe conveying pulsating fluid. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 22: 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00328-8 Fu G, Wang X, Wang B, Su J, Wang K, Sun B (2024) Dynamic behavior of axially functionally graded pipe conveying gasliquid two-phase flow. Appl. Ocean Res. 142: 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2023.103827 Ghadirian H, Mohebpour S, Malekzadeh P, Daneshmand F (2022) Nonlinear free vibrations and stability analysis of FG-CNTRC pipes conveying fluid based on Timoshenko model. Compos. Struct. 292: 115637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115637 Gresil M, Poohsai A, Chandarana N (2017) Guided wave propagation and damage detection in composite pipes using piezoelectric sensors. Procedia. Eng. 188: 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.468 Hou R, Xia Y (2021) Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019. J. Sound Vib. 491: 115741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 Huang YM, Liu YS, Li BH, Li YJ, Yue ZF (2010) Natural frequency analysis of fluid conveying pipeline with different boundary conditions. Nucl. Eng. Des. 240(3): 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.11.038 Jafari R, Razvarz S, Gegov A, Vatchova B (2020) Deep learning for pipeline damage detection: an overview of the concepts and a survey of the state-of-the-art. In 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS48319.2020.9200137 Jafari-Talookolaei RA, Ahmadian MT (2007) Free vibration analysis of a cross-ply laminated composite beam on pasternak foundation. J. Comput. Sci. 3(1): 51–56. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2007.51.56 Jendrzejczyk JA, Chen SS (1985) Experiments on tubes conveying fluid. Thin-Walled Struct. 3(2): 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(85)90028-X Khatir S, Tiachacht S, Le Thanh C, Tran-Ngoc H, Mirjalili S, Wahab MA (2021) A new robust flexibility index for structural damage identification and quantification. Eng. Fail. Anal. 129: 105714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105714 Lafi DE, Bouhadra A, Mamen B, Menasria A, Bourada M, Bousahla AA, Bourada F, Tounsi A, Tounsi A, Yaylaci M (2024) Combined influence of variable distribution models and boundary conditions on the thermodynamic behavior of FG sandwich plates lying on various elastic foundations. Struct. Eng. Mech. 89(2): 103–119. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2024.89.2.103 Lee SI, Chung J (2002) New non-linear modelling for vibration analysis of a straight pipe conveying fluid. J. Sound Vib. 254(2): 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.4097 Lee U, Oh H (2003) The spectral element model for pipelines conveying internal steady flow. Eng. Struct. 25(8): 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00047-6 Lee U, Park J (2006) Spectral element modelling and analysis of a pipeline conveying internal unsteady fluid. J. Fluids Struct. 22(2): 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.09.003 Li B, Wang Z, Jing L (2018) Dynamic response of pipe conveying fluid with lateral moving supports. Shock Vib. 2018(1): 3295787. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3295787 Li M, Ni Q, Wang L (2015a) Nonlinear dynamics of an underwater slender beam with two axially moving supports. Ocean Eng. 108: 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.015 Li S, Karney BW, Liu G (2015b) FSI research in pipeline systems–A review of the literature. J. Fluids Struct. 57: 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.06.020 Li X, Vaz MA, Custódio AB (2023) A finite element methodology for birdcaging analysis of flexible pipes with damaged outer layers. Mar. Struct. 89: 103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103397 Li YD, Yang YR (2017) Vibration analysis of conveying fluid pipe via He's variational iteration method. Appl. Math. Model. 43: 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.11.029 Liang X, Zha X, Jiang X, Wang L, Leng J, Cao Z (2018) Semi-analytical solution for dynamic behavior of a fluid-conveying pipe with different boundary conditions. Ocean Eng. 163: 183190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.060 Liu ZZ, Li TY, Zhu X, Zhang JJ (2010) The effect of hydrostatic pressure fields on the dispersion characteristics of fluid-shell coupled system. J. Mar. Sci. 9: 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-010-9010-3 Logan DL (2011) A first course in the finite element method. 4th edn, Thomson, Canada Ma Y, You Y, Chen K, Feng A (2022) Analysis of vibration stability of fluid conveying pipe on the two-parameter foundation with elastic support boundary conditions. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 9(6): 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.11.002 Ma Y, You Y, Chen K, Hu L, Feng A (2023) Application of harmonic differential quadrature (HDQ) method for vibration analysis of pipes conveying fluid. Appl. Math. Comput. 439: 127613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127613 Mallat SG, Zhang Z (1993) Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41(12): 3397–3415. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.258082 Meenakumari HNR, Zanganeh H, Hossain M (2024) Effect of slug characteristics on the nonlinear dynamic response of a long flexible fluid-conveying cylinder. Appl. Ocean Res. 147: 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2024.103978 Mudhaffar IM, Chikh A, Tounsi A, Al-Osta MA, Al-Zahrani MM, Al-Dulaijan SU (2023) Impact of viscoelastic foundation on bending behavior of FG plate subjected to hygro-thermo-mechanical loads. Struct. Eng. Mech. 86(2): 167–180. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2023.86.2.167 Nahvi H, Jabbari M (2005) Crack detection in beams using experimental modal data and finite element model. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 47(10): 1477–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.008 Nguyen KV (2014) Mode shapes analysis of a cracked beam and its application for crack detection. J. Sound Vib. 333(3): 848–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.10.006 Ni Q, Zhang ZL, Wang L (2011) Application of the differential transformation method to vibration analysis of pipes conveying fluid. Appl. Math. Comput. 217(16): 7028–7038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.116 Olson LG, Jamison D (1997) Application of a general purpose finite element method to elastic pipes conveying fluid. J. Fluids Struct. 11(2): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1996.0073 Pandey AK, Biswas M, Samman MM (1991) Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J. Sound Vib. 145(2): 321332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B Peeters B, Maeck J, De Roeck G (2001) Vibration-based damage detection in civil engineering: excitation sources and temperature effects. Smart Mater. Struct. 10(3): 518. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/314 Saadatmorad M, Jafari-Talookolaei RA, Pashaei MH, Khatir S (2021) Damage detection on rectangular laminated composite plates using wavelet based convolutional neural network technique. Compos. Struct. 278: 114656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114656 Saadatmorad M, Khatir S, Cuong-Le T, Benaissa B, Mahmoudi S (2024a) Detecting damages in metallic beam structures using a novel wavelet selection criterion. J. Sound Vib. 578: 118297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2024.118297 Saadatmorad M, Shahavi MH, Gholipour A (2024b) Damage detection in laminated composite beams reinforced with nano-particles using covariance of vibration mode shape and wavelet transform. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 12(3): 2865–2875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-01019-y Saadatmorad M, Talookolaei RAJ, Pashaei MH, Khatir S, Wahab MA (2022) Pearson correlation and discrete wavelet transform for crack identification in steel beams. Math. 10(15): 2689. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152689 Seguini M, Djamel N, Djilali B, Khatir S, Wahab MA (2022) Crack prediction in beam-like structure using ANN based on frequency analysis. Frat. Integrita. Strutt. 16(59): 18–34. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.59.02 Sha G, Radzieński M, Cao M, Ostachowicz W (2019) A novel method for single and multiple damage detection in beams using relative natural frequency changes. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 132: 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.027 Song Z, Qi X, Liu Z, Ma H (2018) Experimental study of guided wave propagation and damage detection in large diameter pipe filled by different fluids. NDT & E International 93: 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.10.002 Sotoudehnia E, Shahabian F, Sani AA (2019) A new method for damage detection of fluid-structure systems based on model updating strategy and incomplete modal data. Ocean Eng. 187: 106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106200 Tahir SI, Tounsi A, Chikh A, Al-Osta MA, Al-Dulaijan SU, Al-Zahrani MM (2022) The effect of three-variable viscoelastic foundation on the wave propagation in functionally graded sandwich plates via a simple quasi-3D HSDT. Steel Compos. Struct. Int. J. 42(4): 501–511. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2022.42.4.501 Thomson WT (1993) Theory of vibration with applications. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A. 93: 39794. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203718841 Tijsseling AS (1996) Fluid-structure interaction in liquid-filled pipe systems: a review. J. Fluids Struct. 10(2): 109–146. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1996.0009 Tounsi A, Bousahla AA, Tahir SI, Mostefa AH, Bourada F, Al-Osta MA, Tounsi A (2024) Influences of different boundary conditions and hygro-thermal environment on the free vibration responses of FGM sandwich plates resting on viscoelastic foundation. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 24(11): 2450117. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455424501177 Tounsi A, Mostefa AH, Attia A, Bousahla AA, Bourada F, Tounsi A, Al-Osta MA (2023a) Free vibration investigation of functionally graded plates with temperature dependent properties resting on a viscoelastic foundation. Struct. Eng. Mech. 86(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2023.86.1.001 Tounsi A, Mostefa AH, Bousahla AA, Tounsi A, Ghazwani MH, Bourada F, Bouhadra A (2023b) Thermodynamical bending analysis of P-FG sandwich plates resting on nonlinear visco-Pasternak's elastic foundations. Steel Compos. Struct. 49(3): 307323. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2023.49.3.307 Vassilev VM, Djondjorov PA (2006) Dynamic stability of viscoelastic pipes on elastic foundations of variable modulus. J. Sound Vib. 297(1–2): 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.03.025 Wahab MA, De Roeck G (1999) Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario. J. Sound Vib. 226(2): 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2295 Wang F (2018) Effective design of submarine pipe-in-pipe using finite element analysis. Ocean Eng. 153: 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.095 Wang H, Sun D (2019) The application of matching pursuit based on multi feature pattern set in the signal processing of rotating machinery. J. Vib. Control. 25(13): 1974–1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/107754631984443 Yang Z, Wang L (2010) Structural damage detection by changes in natural frequencies. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 21(3): 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-6 Yu H, Cai C, Yuan Y, Jia M (2017) Analytical solutions for Euler-Bernoulli Beam on Pasternak foundation subjected to arbitrary dynamic loads. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods. 41(8): 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2672 Zaitoun MW, Chikh A, Tounsi A, Sharif A, Al-Osta MA, Al-Dulaijan SU, Al-Zahrani MM (2023) An efficient computational model for vibration behavior of a functionally graded sandwich plate in a hygrothermal environment with viscoelastic foundation effects. Eng. Comput. 39(2): 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01498-1 Zhai HB, Wu ZY, Liu YS, Yue ZF (2011) Dynamic response of pipeline conveying fluid to random excitation. Nucl. Eng. Des, 241(8): 2744–2749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.06.024 Zhang YL, Reese JM, Gorman DG (2002) Finite element analysis of the vibratory characteristics of cylindrical shells conveying fluid. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 191(45): 5207–5231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00456-5