b. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
c. Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
d. Endangered Species Scientific Commission, Beijing 100101, China;
e. Yunnan Key Laboratory for Plant Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China;
f. State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Natural Medicines, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
Cancer remains a major global health challenge, with nearly 20 million new cases and 10 million deaths reported in 2022 and projections suggest annual cases could reach 35 million by 2050 (Bray et al., 2024). Natural products have historically been a cornerstone in oncology, with approximately 60% of FDA-approved anticancer drugs derived from natural sources, particularly plants (Newman and Cragg, 2020). Notable examples include vinblastine and vincristine from Catharanthus roseus (Apocynaceae), taxol and docetaxel from Taxus species (Taxaceae), and camptothecin (CPT) from Camptotheca acuminata (Nyssaceae) and Nothapodytes (Icacinaceae) (Cragg and Pezzuto, 2016). However, the high demand for taxol has resulted in the overharvesting of slow-growing Taxus trees, all of which are classified as endangered by the IUCN (Thakur and Kanwal, 2024).
Camptothecin, commonly known as CPT, is a monoterpene pentacyclic quinoline alkaloid and one of the most valuable compounds in the pharmaceutical industry, following taxol and vinca alkaloids. It was first discovered in Camptotheca acuminata (Wall et al., 1966) and has since been identified in several other plants, including Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Govindachari and Viswanathan, 1972), Pyrenacantha klaineana (Zhou et al., 2000), Ophiorrhiza rugosa var. prostata (Gharpure et al., 2010), Chonemorpha grandiflora (Kulkarni et al., 2010), and Dysoxylum binectariferum (Jain et al., 2014), as well as in many unrelated taxa (Ramesha et al., 2013). Among these sources, Nothapodytes species, particularly the roots of N. nimmoniana, are known to have the highest concentration of CPT (Namdeo and Sharma, 2012). By inhibiting DNA topoisomerase Ⅰ, an enzyme essential for DNA replication and repair, CPT disrupts crucial cellular functions, thereby enhancing its anticancer potential (Hsiang et al., 1985).
The high pharmaceutical demand for CPT, particularly from Nothapodytes nimmoniana, has led to extensive harvesting of wild populations, raising significant conservation concerns. This situation reflects a broader trend where various plant species essential for food, medicine, and materials face increasing threats. Factors such as rapid human population growth, urbanization, climate change, invasive species, and habitat degradation, along with unregulated wild plant harvesting, have placed immense pressure on natural ecosystems (Keck et al., 2025).
Traditionally, conservation efforts have focused on endemic, economically important, and endangered species or Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations (PSESP), which receive strong attention due to their urgent conservation needs and success stories in preventing extinction (Ma et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2024). Species listed on the IUCN Red List, the Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants, the Endangered Species Act of the USA, and the CITES List are carefully monitored because they face a high risk of extinction (Spielman et al., 2004; Harris et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015; Qin et al., 2017). However, much less attention is given to widespread species that are still threatened. The concept of Threatened Plant Species with Widespread Distribution (TPSWD) has emerged as a crucial yet underexplored conservation challenge, calling for new strategies to balance sustainable use with long-term ecological preservation (Gaston and Fuller, 2008; Redford et al., 2013; Thakur et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019).
Many medicinal plants decline rapidly at a local level even when they are widely distributed. For example, Nothapodytes, a key source of camptothecin, is overharvested to meet the high demand for anticancer drugs, leading to severe population losses (Chen et al., 2024a). Similarly, slow-growing Taxus trees that provide taxol and docetaxel have been reduced heavily in exploited areas (Thakur and Kanwal, 2024). Chen et al. (2019) found that overharvesting the tuberous roots of Stemona tuberosa, a species distributed in more than ten Asian countries, is the main threat to its survival. This is worsened by pollination limits, loss of seed dispersers, habitat fragmentation, and scattered populations. Similar patterns are seen in other genera such as Aconitum and Ephedra (González-Juárez et al., 2020; Kakkar et al., 2023), where intense, localized collection pressures cause rapid declines. These cases show that a wide geographic distribution does not guarantee species survival.
This case study highlights how TPSWD can be exploited to the brink of endangerment, despite their broad distribution. In this review, we explore the paradox of TPSWD conservation by focusing on: (1) The plant resources of Nothapodytes and their significance. (2) The active ingredients of Nothapodytes with a focus on CPT. (3) Natural drugs derived from Nothapodytes and their pharmaceutical relevance. (4) Strategies for rescuing and utilizing anticancer Nothapodytes species to address conservation and industrial needs. In addition, we propose future directions to address the conservation challenges associated with Nothapodytes and achieve a sustainable balance between biodiversity preservation and pharmaceutical demands.
2. Methods 2.1. Study area, species list and conservation statusThe geographic scope of this review encompasses the natural distribution range of Nothapodytes species across tropical and subtropical Asia, extending from India to Japan. A systematic literature review was conducted to examine the taxonomic placement of the genus Nothapodytes within the broader phylogenetic framework. In addition, we retrieved species occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and relevant literature to compile a validated list of Nothapodytes species. Their formal conservation status was checked against several sources, including the IUCN Red List, the CITES Appendices, and the Threatened Species List of China’s Higher Plants (Qin et al., 2017), to make sure their threat levels were thoroughly assessed.
2.2. Geographic range and threat category assessmentTo assess the geographic distribution and conservation status of Nothapodytes species, we compiled 2428 occurrence records representing ten Nothapodytes species. Data were retrieved from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, 2025) using the rgbif package (Chamberlain and Boettiger, 2017) in R 4.2.3, which included 1660 records for nine species, and from the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (CVH; http://www.cvh.ac.cn), which contained 765 records for seven species. Additional records for Nothapodytes amamianus and N. burmanica were obtained from published literature (Ito et al., 2022; Shen et al., 2024).
We thoroughly examined and cleaned all occurrence records to ensure data reliability. Records not identified to the species level or unrelated to the genus Nothapodytes were excluded. Species names were standardized and validated using the Plants of the World Online database (POWO; https://powo.science.kew.org), and discrepancies were corrected through specimen-based verification when necessary. Only records with precise geographic coordinates were retained, with all coordinates converted from degree–minute–second to decimal degree format for consistency. Duplicate entries with identical species names and coordinates were removed. To further refine the dataset, records originating from urban areas such as botanical gardens, parks, and museums were excluded using the R package CoordinateCleaner package (Zizka et al., 2019). After all filtering and verification steps, 360 occurrence records representing ten Nothapodytes species were retained for subsequent analyses (appsec1).
Since not all Nothapodytes species have been assessed by the IUCN Red List, we conducted a preliminary conservation assessment based on the cleaned occurrence data. The extent of occurrence (EOO)—defined as the smallest polygon encompassing all valid occurrence points, where no internal angle exceeds 180°—was calculated using the convex hull method (Fig. 1c). The area of occupancy (AOO) was estimated using the default 2 × 2 km grid cells (Fig. 1d). Both EOO and AOO were computed in R v.4.2.3 using the ConR package v.2.1 (Dauby et al., 2017) with the functions EOO.computing and AOO.computing, respectively. We note that AOO values can vary depending on the chosen grid size, which is a routine methodological effect. Species were categorized according to the IUCN criteria B1 and/or B2 using the cat_criterion_b function (appsec1).
|
| Fig. 1 The paradox of widespread yet threatened species in the genus Nothapodytes. (a) Conceptual Venn diagram illustrating that, despite their broad distribution across multiple countries and diverse habitats, Nothapodytes species remain threatened due to overharvesting for CPT extraction, habitat destruction, and population decline. (b) Geographic distribution map across Asia (GBIF, 2025). (c) The Extent of Occurrence (EOO). (d) The Area of Occupancy (AOO) for each species. (e) Proposed IUCN Red List categories based on IUCN B1 and/or B2 criteria. |
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Web of Science (WoS) and cross-checked with other electronic databases, including ResearchGate, PubMed, and Google Scholar, using the keyword “Nothapodytes” to retrieve relevant articles (n = 291). These records were further screened based on their relevance to our review theme, focusing on taxonomy and distribution, phytochemistry, pharmacology, microbiology, biotechnology, conservation, and genome biology.
We compiled data on CPT content across different tissues of Nothapodytes collected from various geographic locations, along with details of the extraction techniques used. A systematic listing of phytochemicals reported from different plant parts was created, and studies on endophytes isolated from Nothapodytes were reviewed, particularly those investigating their cytotoxic potential against cancer cell lines. In addition, we studied the market value of CPT and its derivatives, tracking the timeline of FDA-approved drugs derived from this compound to contextualize its economic significance and conservation challenges.
3. Results and discussion 3.1. The paradox of TPSWD conservationThere is a common belief that widespread species are safe from extinction. However, even plants with broad distribution, while they may appear abundant, are not immune to overexploitation (Figs. 1a and 2b). TPSWD face multiple threats, including habitat loss, climate change, and targeted exploitation for medicinal, timber, and food (Pironon et al., 2024; Keck et al., 2025). Among these, the demand for medicinal products poses a particularly significant risk, especially for species targeted by the pharmaceutical industry. The global demand for natural compounds in anticancer drugs has intensified the harvesting pressure on many such species, creating a paradox in which widespread availability does not equate to a secure conservation status. Nothapodytes species, known as primary sources of camptothecin (CPT), exemplify this challenge, as their growing use in cancer therapeutics has led to severe population declines that threaten their long-term survival. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive conservation strategy that considers both ecological sustainability and the socioeconomic drivers of exploitation.
|
| Fig. 2 Reproductive ecology, threats, and conservation of Nothapodytes tomentosa. (a) Natural habitat. (b) Destruction of wild populations due to overharvesting. (c) A fly and (d) a bee visiting male flowers. (e) Female (top) and male (bottom) flowers. (f) Fruits. (g) Seed dispersal by birds. (h) Leaf beetle feeding on leaves. (i) Different stages of seed germination. (j) Local cultivation efforts, showing plantation of young individuals. |
Before formal IUCN assessments, Nothapodytes insularis was classified as Endangered (EN) in a 2018 evaluation, while N. pittosporoides (assessed in 2018) and N. montana (assessed in 2023) were listed as Least Concern (LC). According to the Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants (Qin et al., 2017), N. collina and N. obtusifolia are classified as Endangered (EN), and N. obscura as Vulnerable (VU).
However, a preliminary conservation assessment based on IUCN B1 and/or B2 criteria indicates that although several species (Nothapodytes collina, N. montana, N. nimmoniana, N. obscura, N. pittosporoides, and N. tomentosa) have broad distributions, many are currently under threat (Fig. 1e). For instance, N. nimmoniana and N. pittosporoides initially met the criteria for LC or Near Threatened (NT) based on their vast EOO (5,370,667 km2 and 2,761,368 km2, respectively) (Fig. 1c). However, due to extensive exploitation (Fig. 2b), these species should be categorized as threatened. This highlights the limitations of using distribution range alone as a proxy for conservation status, as large-scale habitat fragmentation and intensive harvesting can drive population declines even in widely distributed species. This paradoxical situation underscores the urgent need for conservation measures and a re-evaluation of existing strategies.
3.2. Plant resources of NothapodytesThe genus Nothapodytes Blume (Icacinaceae) comprises ca. 11 species and is distributed across tropical and subtropical Asia, from India to Japan (Fig. 1b) (Peng and Howard, 2008; Ito et al., 2022). It was originally described by Blume in 1851, based on N. montana Blume from Indonesia. Subsequently, the genus was reclassified by Miers (1852), transferring N. montana to Mappia Jacq. within Mappia sect. Trichocrator, grouping it with seven species found in India and Sri Lanka. Sleumer (1940) restored Nothapodytes as a distinct genus, including five previously described species, although their distributions were not specified. This classification was supported by Howard, who also recognized five species, including one species distributed from India to Taiwan, China (Howard, 1942). Sleumer (1969) further expanded the genus, adding three additional species, which were accepted by both his earlier treatment (Sleumer, 1940) and Howard's treatment (Howard, 1942). In their taxonomic treatment for the Flora of China, Peng and Howard (2008) listed six species, including five endemic to China. A new combination, N. insularis, was proposed following the reassessment of N. nimmoniana sensu lato (Ito et al., 2022). More recently, N. burmanica, a new species, was described from Kachin State, Myanmar (Shen et al., 2024). Among the genus, N. nimmoniana (previously referred to as N. foetida) is the most widely distributed, occurring across South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the southwestern islands of Japan.
In the phylogenetic context, the genus Nothapodytes remains poorly understood. Limited studies have included Nothapodytes species in attempts to resolve phylogenetic relationships within either the Icacinaceae or the lamiid clade (Kårehed, 2001; Byng et al., 2014; Stull et al., 2015). Indian samples of N. nimmoniana were included in phylogenetic analyses of Icacinaceae (Kårehed, 2001; Byng et al., 2014), while a single sample of N. montana was included in the analysis of higher-level relationships within the Lamiidae (Stull et al., 2015). Population-level analyses of N. nimmoniana have revealed genetic diversity among samples collected from different geographical locations in India (Abdul Kareem et al., 2011; Shivaprakash et al., 2014). However, a species-wide genetic analysis of this widespread species remains unexplored. The current understanding of the genus is skewed towards its western range, particularly the Western Ghats, highlighting the need for comparative analyses across its entire distribution (Fig. 3a). Darshetkar et al. (2023) developed SSR markers for N. nimmoniana which could theoretically aid in distinguishing genetically diverse populations, and prioritizing those requiring immediate conservation efforts, while SSR technology faces critical limitations and is supplanting by Next-Generation Sequencing techniques.
|
| Fig. 3 Distribution of camptothecin content across different Nothapodytes species, geographical regions, and plant parts. (a) Camptothecin content across different Nothapodytes species (N. nimmoniana, N. tomentosa, and N. pittosporoides) in relation to their geographic origin (India, China, and Sri Lanka), categorized as low (< 0.1%), medium (0.1–1%), and high (> 1%) levels. (b) Variation in camptothecin content among different plant parts (leaves, stem, stem bark, and roots) of Nothapodytes species, categorized as low, medium, and high. The width of the connecting bands represents the relative contribution of each category. |
A comprehensive understanding of the spatial and temporal distribution of Nothapodytes species is crucial for effective conservation planning. Such knowledge requires biogeographic studies to map the current range of the genus, identify critical habitats, and evaluate the impacts of environmental change on population dynamics. In addition, systematic analyses, including taxonomic clarification and genetic diversity assessments, are essential to ensure that conservation efforts are directed toward the most vulnerable populations. Reproductive ecology further shapes species distribution, as pollination is mediated by diverse insects such as flies and bees (Fig. 2c and d), while sexual dimorphism, with distinct female and male flowers (Fig. 2e) influences reproductive success. Seed dispersal by birds (Fig. 2f and g) contributes to population connectivity across landscapes, whereas biotic pressures, including herbivory by leaf beetles (Fig. 2h), may limit regeneration. Studies on seed biology (Fig. 2i) provide insights into germination dynamics, which are critical for both natural recruitment and ex situ propagation. Collectively, these ecological and genetic studies form the foundation for region-specific conservation strategies that recognize both the ecological role and pharmaceutical significance of these plants.
3.3. Active ingredients of NothapodytesNothapodytes is a genus known for producing camptothecin. Camptothecin is a pentacyclic alkaloid with a quinoline-based structure and a lactone ring, essential for its activity as a topoisomerase Ⅰ inhibitor used in cancer treatment (Hsiang et al., 1985). Camptothecin concentration in the genus Nothapodytes shows asymmetric distribution (Table 1). Studies have shown that CPT levels differ across different geographical regions such as India, Sri Lanka, and China, influenced by local climatic conditions (Namdeo et al., 2010; Pai et al., 2013; Ankad et al., 2015; Degambada et al., 2023). Nothapodytes nimmoniana from Amboli, India, yielded the highest CPT content (1.337 g/100 g dry bark) during the monsoon (August), as compared to other localities (Amba, Chandoli, Naikwadi, and Panhala) and the summer (May) (Pai et al., 2013).
| Species | Tissue type | Location | Extraction technique | CPT content (% DW) | Reference |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Western Ghats, India | Solid liquid extraction | 0.1 | Govindachari and Viswanathan (1972) |
| Stems | 0.06 | ||||
| Stem bark | 0.08 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.01 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Shoot | Mahabaleshwar, India | Solid liquid extraction | 0.075 | Roja and Heble (1994) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Mahabaleshwar, India | Solid liquid extraction | 0.07 | Fulzele and Satdive (2005b) |
| Roots | 0.156 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.06 | ||||
| Stem bark | 0.27 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | NM | India | Microwave | 2.67 | Fulzele and Satdive (2005a) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Western Ghats, India | Micro extraction | 0.333 | Padmanabha et al. (2006) |
| Stems | 0.142 | ||||
| Stem bark | 0.236 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.081 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems (J) | Mahabaleshwar, India | Solid liquid extraction | 0.027 | Roja (2006) |
| Leaves (J) | 0.034 | ||||
| Roots (J) | 0.034 | ||||
| Stems (M) | 0.06 | ||||
| Leaves (M) | 0.01 | ||||
| Roots (M) | 0.1 | ||||
| Stem bark | 0.08 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Kerala, India | Micro extraction | 0.48 | Suhas et al. (2007) |
| Stem bark | 0.7 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stem bark | Western Ghats, India | Ultra sonication | 1.86 | Ramesha et al. (2008) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Leaves | Ooty, India | Micro extraction | 0.02 | Singh et al. (2010) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Karnataka, India | NM | 0.29 | Kavitha et al. (2010) |
| Stem bark | 0.24 | ||||
| Stems | 0.12 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.08 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Pathan, India | Ultra sonication | 1.45 | Namdeo et al. (2010) |
| Leaves | 0.7 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Guangzhou, China | Ultra sonication | 1.87 | Ao et al. (2011) |
| Stems | 0.54 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.42 | ||||
| Stem bark | 0.08 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Mahabaleshwar, India | Ultra sonication | 2.62 | Namdeo and Sharma (2012) |
| Stems | 0.81 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.7 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stem bark | Amboli, India | Microwave | 1.337 | Pai et al. (2013) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China | Supercritical fluid extraction | 0.171 | Chu et al. (2014) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Belgaum, India | Acclerated solvent extraction | 0.188 | Upadhya et al. (2014) |
| Nothapodytes pittosporoides | Roots | Hunan, China | Soaking in ethanol | 0.944 | Bai and Song (2014) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Amagon, India | Micro extraction | 0.123 | Ankad et al. (2015) |
| Leaves | 0.033 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Amboli, India | Micro extraction | 0.067 | Ankad et al. (2015) |
| Leaves | 0.024 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Joida, India | Micro extraction | 0.069 | Ankad et al. (2015) |
| Leaves | 0.029 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Mahabaleshwar, India | Ultrasound-assisted | 0.32 | Patil and Akamanchi (2017a) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stems | Mahabaleshwar, India | Microwave | 0.41 | Patil and Akamanchi (2017b) |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Hakgala, Srilanka | Ultra sonication; Chloroform–methanol; Hot ethanol | 1.91 | Degambada et al. (2023) |
| Leaves | 0.08 | ||||
| Stem bark | 1.23 | ||||
| Nothapodytes tomentosa | Roots | Kunming, Yunnan, China | Sonication | 0.096 | Li et al. (2023) |
| Stems | 0.069 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.012 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Roots | Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China | Sonication | 0.103 | Li et al. (2023) |
| Stems | 0.001 | ||||
| Leaves | 0.005 | ||||
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Stem bark | Mahabaleshwar, India | Enzyme-assisted | 0.343 | Patil et al. (2024) |
| J – Juvenile; M− Mature; NM – Not mentioned. | |||||
The concentration of CPT also varies among different plant tissues (Fig. 3b). The highest reported CPT content, 2.67% dry weight, was obtained from Nothapodytes nimmoniana collected in India using a microwave extraction technique (Fulzele and Satdive, 2005a). The roots collected in February accumulated the highest CPT levels (2.62%), followed by fruits (1.22%), stems (0.81%), and leaves (0.70%) (Namdeo and Sharma, 2012). Temporal variations were also noted, with roots consistently yielding the highest CPT concentrations, three times higher than in leaves or stems (Table 1). Although roots show a wide range of CPT concentrations and are considered the richest source, harvesting them requires uprooting the entire tree, which can negatively impact the plant population and sustainability. Consequently, stem bark is often recommended as a more sustainable alternative (Patil et al., 2024). However, excessive bark harvesting can still pose a significant risk to tree health, particularly when done repeatedly or indiscriminately. Furthermore, seasonal differences in CPT production were studied, with the monsoon showing higher concentrations of camptothecin in the bark of N. nimmoniana compared to the summer (Pai et al., 2013). In the case of N. pittosporoides, only one study has reported the CPT content, with roots showing a concentration of 0.944% dry weight (Bai and Song, 2014). Similarly, a single study on N. tomentosa (Fig. 2a) found that CPT concentration was highest in the roots (0.096%), followed by the stems (0.069%) and leaves (0.012%) (Li et al., 2023).
Studies have shown that plants harvested from different sites, during varying seasons, and from various plant parts accumulate diverse levels and forms of CPT derivatives (Fulzele and Satdive, 2005b; Namdeo et al., 2010; Ao et al., 2011; Pai et al., 2013; Ankad et al., 2015; Li et al., 2023). This variation significantly impacts both extraction efficiency and pharmacological quality. However, no comprehensive study has been conducted across the full distribution range of these plants, underscoring the need for spatial and temporal investigations. Such studies are crucial for conservation efforts and pharmaceutical applications, as they could help identify the most productive environments and optimize harvesting strategies. Understanding how environmental factors, including soil type, climate, and altitude, affect CPT biosynthesis would provide valuable insights.
Camptothecin is a key bioactive compound that has been extensively studied within the genus Nothapodytes. Phytochemical profiling across different species, including N. nimmoniana, N. pittosporoides, and N. tomentosa, has reported a variety of bioactive compounds extracted from various plant tissues, such as stems, roots, trunk bark, fruits, and seeds (Table 2). Notably, the majority of these compounds have been isolated from stems, which are often prioritized due to their relatively higher yield of CPT derivatives. Despite the genus comprising approximately 11 species, research has predominantly focused on only three. This limited scope may be attributed to factors such as restricted distribution, lesser-known phytochemical potential, or limited accessibility to other species. Expanding phytochemical investigations to include lesser-studied species could provide a broader understanding of the diversity and distribution of CPT derivatives, offering new insights for conservation strategies and optimizing pharmaceutical applications.
| Species | Phytochemical name | Plant parts used | References |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Camptothecin | Stems | (Govindachari and Viswanathan, 1972; Aiyama et al., 1988; Pirillo et al., 1995; Das et al., 1998; Wu et al., 1995, 2008; Das and Madhusudhan, 1999) |
| 9-methoxycamptothecin | Stems | (Govindachari and Viswanathan, 1972; Pirillo et al., 1995; Das et al., 1998; Wu et al., 1995, 2008; Das and Madhusudhan, 1999; Susanna et al., 2022) | |
| Acetylcamptothecin; (+)-l-hydroxypinoresinol, ω-hydroxypropioguaiacone, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, Scopoletin, Uracil, Thymine, Sitosterol, Sitosteryl-β-D-glucoside, 3β-hydroxy-stigmast-5-en-7-one, Stigmast-5-en-3β,7α-diol, 6β-hydroxystigmast-4-en-3-one, Sitost-4-en-3-one, Linoleic acid, Trigonelline, Pumiloside | Stems | Wu et al. (1995) | |
| Mappicine; 9-methoxymappicine glycosides; Di-p-coumaroylspermidine ester of a camptothecin-like compound | Trunk bark | Pirillo et al. (1995) | |
| Nothapodytine A; Nothapodytine B | Stems | Wu et al. (1996) | |
| (20S)-18,19-dehydrocamptothecin | Stems | Aiyama et al. (1988) | |
| 5-Methoxy-1-oxo-tetrahydro- β -carboline | Stems | Das et al. (1998) | |
| 20-O-acetylcamptothecin | Stems | Das et al. (1998) | |
| 9-Methoxy-20-O-acetylcamptothecin | Stems | Srinivas and Das (2003) | |
| 9-methoxy-18,19-dehydrocamptothecin; 5hydroxymappicine-20-O-β-glucopyranoside; 5-hydroxy-9-methoxycamptothecin; Diosmetin; Apigenin; Apigenin-7-O-glucopyranoside; Rosin (cinnamyl-O-β-d-glucopyranoside); Amarantholidoside Ⅳ | Immature seeds | Wu et al. (2008) | |
| Viminalol; Sitosterol; Lupeol; Trigonelline; Costunolide; Scopoletin; Various di and tri terpenes; Flavonoids, Amino acids; Organic acids | Leaves | Susanna et al. (2022) | |
| Nothapodytes pittosporoides | Camptothecin; 9-methoxycamptothecin; 10-hydroxycamptothecin; 9-methoxymappicine-20-O-β-d-glucopyranoside; Mappicine-20-O-β-d-glucopyranoside; (3S)-pumiloside; (−)-(3S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-β-carboline-3-carboxylic acid; β-sitosterol; β-daucosterol; 7-oxo-sitosterol; β-sitosteryl-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside-20-O-palmitate; 6β-dihydroxydaucosterol; Lupeol; 3-acetoxy-12-oleanen-28-ol, O-acetyl-7-methoxycamptothecin | Roots | Guo et al. (2015) |
| Nothapodytes tomentosa | Camptothecin; (20S)-9-methoxy-17-hydroxymappicine 20-O-β-d-glucopyranoside; 10-β-D-glucosyloxycamptothecin; 9-methoxy-10-β-D-glucosyloxycamptothecin; 9-β-D-glucosyloxycamptothecin; 10-hydroxycamptothecin; 9-hydroxycamptothecin; 20-β-D-glucosyloxycamptothecin; 9-methoxy-10-hydroxycamptothecin; (20S)-17-hydroxymappicine 20-O-β-d-glucopyranoside; Mappicine (20S)–O-β-D-gentiobioside; 5-hydroxycamptothecin; Mappicine; 9-methoxy-5-hydroxycamptothecin; (20S)-mappicine 20-O-β-d-glucopyranoside; 9-methoxycamptothecin; (20S)-9 methoxymappicine 20-O-β-d-glucopyranoside | Roots; Stems; Leaves; Fruits | Li et al. (2023) |
Endophytes are recognized as a significant source of novel bioactive molecules. Several endophytes have been identified in Nothapodytes, and their cytotoxicity has been assessed using various cell lines (Table 3). For example, endophytic fungi such as Entrophospora infrequens, Neurospora sp. (ZP5SE), Nodulisporium sp., Fusarium sp., Diaporthe sp., Irpex sp., Botryosphaeria sp., Galactomyces sp., and Alternaria sp. have been isolated from N. nimmoniana. Similarly, endophytes, including Fusarium solani HB1-J1, Diaporthe sp., Botryosphaeria sp., Phoma sp., Mycosphaerella sp., and Colletotrichum sp., have been reported from N. pittosporoides. However, the yields reported for these endophytes have been low and inconsistent (Table 3). Co-cultivation of two endophytic fungi, Colletotrichum fructicola SUK1 (F1) and Corynespora cassiicola SUK2 (F2), isolated from N. nimmoniana, has been employed to enhance CPT production (146 mg/l) (Bhalkar et al., 2016).
| Species | Endophytes | Location | CPT content | Cell lines tested | Cytotoxicity assessment | References |
| Nothapodytes nimmoniana | Entrophospora infrequens | Chandigarh, India | 18 μg/mg | Lung cancer (A-549), liver cancer (HEP-2), ovarian cancer (OVCAR-5) | Showed comparable activities to camptothecin. | Puri et al. (2005) |
| Entrophospora infrequens | Jammu, India | 4.96 mg/100g | NM | NM | Amna et al. (2006) | |
| Neurospora sp. (ZP5SE) | Karnataka, India | 5.5 μg/g | Lung cancer (A-549), ovarian cancer (OVCAR-5) | Showed comparable activities to camptothecin. | Rehman et al. (2008) | |
| Nodulisporium sp. | Karnataka, India | 45 μg/g | Liver (HEP-2), lung (A-549), ovary (OVCAR-5), prostate (PC-3), cervix (HeLa), colon (HCT-15), oral cell line (KB), CNS (SNB78) | The OVCAR-5 cell line showed maximum inhibition of 90%, whereas the HEP-2 (liver) cell line was the least sensitive, showing only 25% inhibition. | (Rehman et al. 2009a, 2009b) | |
| Fusarium sp., Diaporthe sp., Irpex sp., Botryosphaea sp., Galactomyces sp. | Western Ghats, India | 9.82 μg/100 mg | NM | NM | Gurudatt et al. (2010) | |
| Entrophospora infrequens | Jammu, India | 503 μg/100g | Human leukemia (HL-60) | Treated cells showed reduced size, nuclear condensation, and decreased protoplasmic extensions. | Amna et al. (2012) | |
| Bionectria ochroleuca NOTL33 | Karnataka, India | NM | NM | NM | Samaga et al. (2014) | |
| Phomopsis sp. | Karnataka, India | NM | NM | NM | Shweta et al. (2014) | |
| Fusarium oxysporum | Maharashtra, India | 283 mg/l | NM | NM | Bhalkar et al. (2015) | |
| Fusarium oxysporum NFX06 | India | 628.08 ng/g | NM | NM | Musavi et al. (2015) | |
| Fusarium sp., Hypoxylon sp., | Karnataka, India | NM | NM | NM | Shweta et al. (2015) | |
| Colletotrichum fructicola SUK1 (F1) | Maharashtra, India | 33 mg/l | NM | NM | Bhalkar et al. (2016) | |
| Corynespora cassiicola SUK2 (F2) | 69 mg/l | |||||
| Mixed fermentation (F1+F2) | 146 mg/l | |||||
| Alternaria alstroemeriae (NCIM1408) | Bengaluru, India | 426.7 μg/g | Human breast cancer (MCF7), ovarian adenocarcinoma (SKOV3), non-small cell lung carcinoma (H1299), colon adenocarcinoma (Caco-2, HT29), non-cancerous embryonic kidney (HEK293T) | Cytotoxicity (IC50): MCF7 (44.6 ± 12.6 nM), H1299 (13.6 ± 1.7 nM), SKOV3 (117.4 ± 10.4 nM), HT29 (50.1 ± 11.2 nM), Caco-2 (26.9 ± 3.5 nM), HEK293T (158.4 ± 55.6 nM). | Mohinudeen et al. (2021) | |
| Alternaria burnsii (NCIM1409) | 403.3 μg/g | |||||
| Diaporthe sp. F18 | Sri Lanka | 72 μg/g | NM | NM | Degambada et al. (2023) | |
| Nothapodytes pittosporoides | Diaporthe sp., Botryosphaeria sp., Phoma sp., Mycosphaerella sp., Acrocalymma sp., Penicillium sp., Leptospora sp., Didymella sp., Pseudocercospora sp., Cercophora sp., Colletotrichum sp., Alternaria sp., Pestalotiopsis sp., Pseudofusicoccum sp., Zasmidium sp., Aspergillus sp., Fusarium sp. | Guizhou, China | NM | NM | NM | Li et al. (2018) |
| Monilochaetes nothapodytis | Guizhou, China | NM | NM | NM | Zhou et al. (2017) | |
| Colletotrichum sp. | Guizhou and Hunan, China | NM | NM | NM | Zhou et al. (2019) | |
| Fusarium solani HB1-J1 | China | NM | Human alveolar adenocarcinoma (A549) | IC50 decreased from 369.22 to 285.89 μg/mL, with the apoptosis ratio significantly increased by approximately 4.86-fold. | Cai et al. (2022) | |
| NM – Not mentioned. | ||||||
Entrophospora infrequens isolated from Nothapodytes nimmoniana exhibited CPT contents ranging from 4.96 mg/100 g to 503 μg/100 g, with strong cytotoxic effects against various cancer cell lines (Amna et al., 2006, 2012; Puri et al., 2005). Likewise, Neurospora sp. (ZP5SE) and Nodulisporium sp. showed CPT yields of 5.5 μg/g and 45 μg/g, respectively, and both demonstrated notable cytotoxic activities comparable to standard camptothecin against lung (A-549), ovarian (OVCAR-5), and other cancer cell lines (Rehman et al. 2008, 2009a, 2009b). These findings underscore the remarkable potential of fungal endophytes as alternative or supplementary sources of CPT, especially given the challenges of sustainable plant-based harvesting and the often-low yields in native hosts.
Despite these promising results, several issues remain. First, CPT yields in endophytic fungi are frequently low and can vary significantly depending on factors such as culture conditions, fungal strain stability, and the symbiotic state with the host plant. Second, reliable and scalable production methods have yet to be fully established. Here, synthetic biology approaches present a promising solution. By leveraging metabolic engineering tools, researchers can (1) identify and optimize the CPT biosynthetic genes within fungal endophytes, (2) construct heterologous expression systems to enhance yields, and (3) develop stable production platforms that can be scaled up for industrial applications (Harvey et al., 2018; Kaur et al., 2020).
Studies on soil microbial communities in the root zone of Nothapodytes nimmoniana have shown that the application of organic fertilizers significantly mitigates the adverse effects of cultivation on soil microbial activities (Chung and Chang, 2012). Despite these findings, investigations into the functional roles and biotechnological potential of these endophytes remain limited. Notably, there is no evidence of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from the host plant to the endophytes, although HGT among endophytes themselves may still be a possibility (Natarajan et al., 2023).
A critical gap in current research is the lack of a dedicated database for endophytes and their metabolites, making it challenging to fully understand the physiological and biochemical interactions between host plants and associated endophytic fungi. To enhance the production of specific metabolites and develop new analogs of active secondary metabolites, various techniques can be employed. These include physicochemical and genetic modification strategies such as the One Strain Many Compounds (OSMAC) approach (Zhang et al., 2024), co-cultivation (Bertrand et al., 2014), and epigenetic modifications (Keller, 2019). However, large-scale industrial production of bioactive compounds from fungal endophytes remains a labor-intensive process. Effective methods, such as CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and the use of epigenetic modifiers, are necessary to optimize the biosynthesis of these compounds. Bioprospecting efforts have increasingly focused on medicinal plants to identify endophytic microorganisms capable of producing camptothecin and its structural analogs. Nevertheless, achieving cost-effective and commercially viable production of CPT from endophytic fungi remains a significant challenge.
Nothapodytes species have evolved effective chemical defenses, including the production of CPT, which is toxic to many herbivores. In CPT-producing plants, mutations in topoisomerase 1 (Top1) confer resistance, suggesting convergent evolution of this defense mechanism (Sirikantaramas et al., 2008, 2015). Certain insects, such as the chrysomelid beetle Kanarella unicolor (Ramesha et al., 2011) and the lepidopteran larva Lymantria sp. (Sajitha et al., 2018) (family Lymantriidae), have developed mechanisms to detoxify CPT, allowing them to feed exclusively on Nothapodytes leaves without adverse effects. This interaction highlights the “defense and detoxification” dynamics between Nothapodytes and its herbivores. Investigating how these herbivores detoxify CPT could provide novel insights into the development of new pharmacological compounds or the enhancement of existing therapies.
3.4. Natural drugs related to NothapodytesPlant-derived anticancer drugs, particularly CPT derivatives such as irinotecan and topotecan, are crucial in oncology (Fig. 4b). Irinotecan, introduced in 1994, has achieved significant commercial success, generating over $600 million in revenue by 2018, with liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) contributing 20% of this value (Bailly, 2019). The biosynthesis of camptothecin (CPT) begins with the condensation of tryptamine, derived from the shikimate pathway, and secologanin, a monoterpenoid synthesized via the mevalonate (MVA) and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways. This reaction, catalyzed by secologanic acid synthase (STRAS), produces strictosidinic acid as the key central intermediate (Sadre et al., 2016). Subsequent enzymatic steps, including oxidative rearrangements, hydroxylations, reductions, and dehydration reactions, lead to the formation of characteristic pentacyclic quinoline of CPT (Sadre et al., 2016; Pu et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2024b).
|
| Fig. 4 Biosynthesis, structural modifications, and clinical advancements of camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives. (a) Structural modifications of CPT. Enzymatic reactions involved in the formation of CPT derivatives are indicated with corresponding gene annotations (Salim et al., 2018; Nguyen et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2024b). Dashed arrows represent the semi-synthesis of topotecan, SN-38, and irinotecan (Gao et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2024b). (b) Timeline of drug development derived from CPT. All drugs shown are FDA approved except for belotecan. |
The roles of the MVA and MEP pathways in CPT biosynthesis in N. nimmoniana were elucidated using fosmidomycin and lovastatin as pathway-specific inhibitors (Rather et al., 2019). Fosmidomycin significantly reduced secologanin (40–57%) and CPT (64–71.5%) levels, whereas lovastatin caused moderate reductions in secologanin (7.5%) and CPT (7–11%) levels (Rather et al., 2019). These findings suggest that the MEP pathway is the primary contributor to CPT biosynthesis, with the MVA pathway playing a supplementary role. Transcriptional analyses further supported these findings by showing altered expression of key biosynthetic genes, including deoxy-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), secologanin synthase (SLS), and STR (Rather et al., 2019).
Further transcriptomic and metabolomic studies from N. nimmoniana have supported secologanin as a central intermediate. The identification of key enzymes, including geraniol 10-hydroxylase (NnCYP76B6), further underscores the role of secologanin and related intermediates in the biosynthesis of CPT (Rather et al., 2018). In addition, three NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) isoforms—NfCPR1, NfCPR2, and NfCPR3—were characterized, where NfCPR2 was shown to enhance geraniol 10-hydroxylase (G10H) activity in insect cells, significantly boosting eriodictyol production (Huang et al., 2012).
Transient overexpression of SLS (NnCYP72A1) increased secologanin and CPT levels by 1.13–1.43-fold and 2.02–2.86-fold, respectively, with elicitor treatments further enhancing CPT accumulation, underscoring its potential for metabolic engineering (Rather et al., 2020). Moreover, transcriptomic studies of Nothapodytes nimmoniana stem wood have identified 13 genes associated with CPT biosynthesis, highlighting the roles of NnPG10H, NnPSLS, and NnPSTR in CPT production, which suggest that CPT is likely synthesized in the leaves and stored in the stem wood (Manjunatha et al., 2016). In addition, transcriptionally active AP2/ERF and bHLH transcription factors (TFs) were identified, revealing their roles in CPT biosynthesis through root-enriched expression, phylogenetic clustering with alkaloid-regulating TFs, and promoter cis-element analyses, suggesting regulation via jasmonic acid (Godbole et al., 2023).
Similarly, the overexpression of VeA in endophytic Fusarium solani isolated from Nothapodytes pittosporoides significantly enhanced antitumor activity, reducing the IC50 value from 369.22 to 285.89 μg/mL and increasing apoptosis by 4.86-fold. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses revealed altered expression of 48 antitumor-related genes, including those encoding glycosyl hydrolases, the Zn(2)-Cys(6) transcription factors, cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, 3-isopropylmalate dehydratases, and polyketide synthases (Cai et al., 2022).
Structural modifications play a pivotal role in fine-tuning pharmacological activity and enhancing drug-like properties. The clinical success of two C-10 modified camptothecin derivatives, topotecan and irinotecan, as potent anticancer agents underscores the need to develop methods for accessing other functionalized congeners, such as those modified at the C-9 and C-10 positions (Fig. 4). These sites are critical for synthetic and semi-synthetic strategies, enabling the creation of tailored CPT analogs with improved therapeutic indices while retaining their potent topoisomerase Ⅰ inhibitory activity.
C-9 functionalized CPT derivatives, such as 9-hydroxycamptothecin (9-HCPT) and 9-methoxycamptothecin (9-MCPT), have emerged as potent anticancer agents with remarkable efficacy against various tumor cell lines. Notably, 9-HCPT has shown superior cytotoxicity compared to the widely used anticancer drug topotecan, being nearly an order of magnitude more effective in pancreatic cancer cells (SW1990) (Liu et al., 2022). Similarly, 9-MCPT has shown selective inhibition of ovarian (A2780) and cervical (HeLa) cancer cells, exceeding the potency of C-10 hydroxylated CPT derivatives (Wang et al., 2013). Despite their therapeutic promise, the chemical synthesis of C-9 functionalized derivatives remains challenging due to low yields and harsh reaction conditions (Gao et al., 2005). Natural sources of these derivatives have been identified in species such as Nothapodytes nimmoniana and Ophiorrhiza pumila, with studies reporting the first isolation of 9-HCPT from N. tomentosa (Li et al., 2023). Although the raw abundance of these derivatives in plants is low, the identification of biosynthetic genes holds significant potential for scalable production through synthetic biology approaches.
Recently, metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses have unveiled four key tailoring enzymes, including camptothecin 9-hydroxylase (NtCPT9H), 9-hydroxycamptothecin O-methyltransferases (NtOMT1/2), and 9-hydroxycamptothecin UDP-glycosyltransferase (NtUGT5), responsible for C-9 functionalization of CPT in Nothapodytes tomentosa (Chen et al., 2024). These enzymes facilitate the biosynthesis of derivatives such as 9-HCPT and 9-MCPT, advancing the understanding of CPT tailoring mechanisms. Comparable enzymes have been identified in other CPT-producing species, including C. acuminata and O. pumila, where cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as camptothecin 10-hydroxylase (CaCPT10H) and 11-hydroxylase (CaCPT11H), are involved in C-10 and C-11 functionalization, respectively (Nguyen et al., 2021). In addition, a 10-hydroxycamptothecin O-methyltransferase (Ca10OMT) has been reported to further modify the C-10 hydroxyl group (Fig. 4a) (Salim et al., 2018). The biosynthetic machinery specific to C-9 modifications paves the way for leveraging synthetic biology to enhance the production of C-9 functionalized CPT derivatives, enabling the development of next-generation anticancer therapeutics.
CPT derivatives have become pivotal in the development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which employ the selective targeting capabilities of monoclonal antibodies to deliver cytotoxic drugs directly to tumor cells. In particular, sacituzumab govitecan, a monoclonal antibody with a cytotoxic payload derived from the CPT metabolite SN-38, was granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of breast cancer (Wahby et al., 2021). The combination of CPT derivatives with innovative linker technologies in ADCs is revolutionizing precision oncology, offering greater efficacy and safety profiles compared to conventional chemotherapeutics (Akram et al., 2025).
In parallel, advancements in chemical synthesis have led to more efficient methods for the total and semi-synthesis of camptothecin. The total synthesis of camptothecin, though challenging due to its complex pentacyclic structure, may provide a deeper understanding of its chemical properties and synthetic feasibility. Synthetic methodologies, including total and combinatorial synthesis, are crucial for creating structurally diverse molecules with potent pharmacological effects. Advanced synthetic strategies such as Function-Oriented Synthesis (FOS) (Wender et al., 2008), Biology-Oriented Synthesis (BIOS) (Hattum and Waldmann, 2014), Diversity-Oriented Synthesis (DOS) (Zhang et al., 2022), and Pharmacophore-Oriented SemiSynthesis (POSS) (Zhou et al., 2022) should be prioritized in future research. These approaches not only increase the availability of the compound but also reduce the ecological impact of its production, offering a viable path forward for conserving Nothapodytes populations.
3.5. Rescuing and utilizing anticancer Nothapodytes speciesThe rescue and sustainable utilization of Nothapodytes species are critical to balancing conservation efforts with pharmaceutical demands, particularly for CPT production. Optimizing in vitro culture conditions is crucial, which is influenced by factors such as medium composition, plant growth regulator (PGR) concentrations, and environmental conditions. 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) was found to be effective for callus initiation, while NAA has been shown to yield higher CPT content (Fulzele et al., 2001; Thengane et al., 2003). Callogenesis was effectively induced using Thidiazuron (TDZ) in combination with 2,4-D, with hypocotyl explants showing the highest response and calli grown on 2 mg/L TDZ + 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D exhibiting a two-fold increase in CPT content (Kadam et al., 2023). Semi-solid and liquid media have been compared, with liquid media allowing enhanced nutrient diffusion but causing CPT leaching, mitigated by XAD-7 addition to prevent degradation (Jisha, 2006; Dandin and Murthy, 2012; Karwasara and Dixit, 2013). The use of sucrose as a carbon source and selective nitrogen feeding further enhances CPT yield, but challenges remain in stabilizing high-producing cell lines and understanding regulatory biochemical pathways for industrial-scale production (Karwasara and Dixit, 2013).
Similarly, in vitro organogenesis through both direct and indirect regeneration has been studied, with BAP being the most effective PGR for shoot induction, while TDZ, despite its efficiency, requires BAP or glutamine supplementation to prevent shoot stunting (Satheeshkumar and Seeni, 2000; Dandin and Murthy, 2012). Genetic fidelity assessments using ISSR markers showed 97% homology to the mother plant (Chandrika et al., 2010), while high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis showed consistent CPT content, ensuring chemical uniformity with the elite mother plant (Prakash et al., 2016). Somatic embryogenesis (SE) supplemented with 2,4-D, 6-benzyladenine (BA), and kinetin offers a promising avenue for large-scale propagation, with proteomics studies revealing key molecular pathways involved in embryogenic competence (Isah and Umar, 2019). Furthermore, reproductive ecology studies indicate that Nothapodytes nimmoniana, primarily pollinated by Apis dorsata and Trigona iridipennis, faces pollen limitation and reduced fruit set under exploitative conditions, highlighting the need for conservation efforts (Sharma et al., 2011).
To ensure a sustainable supply of CPT and protect Nothapodytes species, Peng et al. (2024) propose a comprehensive conservation strategy that integrates biogeographic assessments, genetic and metabolic studies, and pharmacological innovations. Balancing conservation efforts with pharmaceutical advancements requires policy-driven initiatives that reinforce sustainable resource management and enhance drug development pipelines. Integrating plant resource management with modern synthetic and biotechnological approaches will facilitate the preservation of Nothapodytes while maximizing its medicinal potential for anticancer drug development.
4. Future directions: harmonizing conservation and pharmaceutical needsThe conservation of TPSWD, such as Nothapodytes, requires a multi-faceted approach that harmonizes biodiversity protection with the pharmaceutical demand for bioactive compounds like camptothecin (Peng et al., 2024). Given the absence of comprehensive taxonomic and phylogenetic studies on Nothapodytes—and recognizing that robust taxonomy underpins effective conservation biology—an integrative taxonomic approach for this genus is urgently needed. To ensure the sustainability of these species, conservation efforts should focus on four key strategies:
(1) Reassessing the threat levels of regional populations: Accurate threat assessment is crucial for the effective conservation of Nothapodytes. While the species may be widespread, the ecological status of regional populations varies due to habitat degradation, overharvesting, and fragmented distributions. Implementing long-term population monitoring using remote sensing and GIS technologies can provide real-time data on species distribution and vulnerability. Additionally, population modeling can help predict declines and assess the impact of current harvesting practices. Incorporating these insights into IUCN Red List assessments will ensure that conservation priorities are based on up-to-date scientific data, enabling more targeted interventions.
(2) Strengthening flexible adaptive local management and conservation: Conservation strategies must be adaptable to local socio-economic conditions. In situ conservation, such as the establishment of protected areas and community-managed reserves, is critical for preserving Nothapodytes in its natural habitat. Simultaneously, ex situ conservation, including seed banks, germplasm collections, and botanical gardens, can safeguard genetic diversity and facilitate species recovery. According to the BGCI PlantSearch database, several Nothapodytes species are currently maintained in ex situ collections, primarily in Chinese botanical gardens. Nothapodytes nimmoniana is held in two institutions: the Botanischer Garten der Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz (Germany) and the Dr. Cecilia Koo Botanic Conservation Center (Taiwan, China). Nothapodytes pittosporoides is the most widely represented, occurring in four Chinese botanical gardens (Hunan, Kunming, Wuhan, and Xishuangbanna). Nothapodytes collina, N. obscura, and N. obtusifolia are each maintained in one or two institutions, all located in China, while N. tomentosa is represented in two collections (Kunming and Xishuangbanna). Although all six species are represented in at least one collection, their coverage remains limited, highlighting the need for broader ex situ conservation efforts, particularly seed banking, to ensure their long-term survival. In addition, sustainable conservation requires active engagement of local communities (Fig. 2j) (Chen et al., 2019). Providing training on sustainable harvesting techniques and the integration of modern propagation methods will empower residents to cultivate Nothapodytes effectively, reducing pressure on wild populations while fostering economic opportunities through the development of a sustainable medicinal plant industry.
(3) Reducing trade under certain conditions: Regulating trade in Nothapodytes-derived camptothecin requires a balanced approach that minimizes wild population depletion while supporting sustainable production. Instead of imposing strict trade restrictions, efforts should focus on shifting supply toward large-scale artificial plantations, particularly in tropical regions, where controlled cultivation can meet market demand. Expanding plantations to thousands of acres will provide a reliable, sustainable source of camptothecin while alleviating pressure on natural populations. Simultaneously, strengthening international trade monitoring through CITES regulations is essential to prevent illegal harvesting and ensure compliance with sustainable sourcing standards. Implementing certification systems, such as FairWild, can further promote traceability and ethical trade, while national policies should establish scientifically backed quotas and harvesting guidelines to regulate wild collection.
(4) Seeking alternative resources overall: To reduce pressure on wild populations, alternative camptothecin production methods must be explored. Lessons from Taxus spp. conservation, where paclitaxel production shifted from wild harvesting to semi-synthesis, cell culture, and fungal fermentation, should be applied to Nothapodytes (Yukimune et al., 1996; Xiong et al., 2021). Advances in synthetic biology, microbial fermentation, and chemical synthesis could provide scalable production methods for camptothecin, reducing dependency on natural sources. Research on endophytic microorganisms that enhance metabolite production may also open new biotechnological avenues for sustainable drug development.
(5) Enhancing camptothecin production through metabolic engineering and synthetic biology: To address resource constraints in camptothecin (CPT) production from Nothapodytes, future efforts should focus on deciphering the CPT biosynthetic pathway. This understanding will facilitate two key advancements: first, increasing CPT yields through metabolic engineering to reduce dependence on natural resources; and second, synthetic biology to optimize enzymatic steps by leveraging genetic diversity across Nothapodytes species, enabling more efficient and targeted synthesis of CPT and its active derivatives.
The conservation of TPSWD, including Nothapodytes, presents a complex challenge requiring an integrated approach that combines scientific innovation, conservation strategies, and policy interventions. By reassessing threat levels, implementing adaptive management, regulating trade, and developing alternative resources, it is possible to achieve long-term sustainability. Multidisciplinary collaboration among ecologists, pharmacologists, conservation biologists, and policymakers is essential to harmonizing biodiversity conservation with pharmaceutical advancements, ensuring that these species remain available for both ecological and medicinal purposes.
AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Jianping Huang, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KIB), and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and constructive comments. We also extend our appreciation to Zeting Zhao (KIB) for providing the photo (Fig. 2i). This work was equally supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFF1306700), the Key Project of Basic Research of Yunnan Province, China (202301AS070001), and the Regional Innovative Development Joint Fund of NSFC (U23A20149).
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Bishal Gurung: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Visualization, Formal analysis, Data curation. Yan Zeng: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. Jia Tang: Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Xing-Rong Peng: Writing – review & editing. Yu-Lin Xu: Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Feng-Mao Yang: Methodology, Visualization. Xiang-Hai Cai: Writing – review & editing. Jia Ge: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition. Gao Chen: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current review are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2025.10.005.
Abdul Kareem, V.K., Rajasekharan, P.E., Mini, S., et al., 2011. Genetic diversity and structure of the threatened anti-cancerous plant Nothapodytes nimmoniana as revealed by ISSR analysis. Plant Genet. Res., 9: 506-514. DOI:10.1017/S1479262111000803 |
Aiyama, R., Nagai, H., Nokata, K., et al., 1988. A camptothecin derivative from Nothapodytes foetida. Phytochemistry, 27: 3663-3664. DOI:10.1016/0031-9422(88)80789-1 |
Akram, F., Ali, A.M., Akhtar, M.T., et al., 2025. The journey of antibody-drug conjugates for revolutionizing cancer therapy: a review. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 117: 118010. DOI:10.1016/j.bmc.2024.118010 |
Amna, T., Amina, M., Sharma, P.R., et al., 2012. Effect of precursors feeding and media manipulation on production of novel anticancer pro-drug camptothecin from endophytic fungus. Braz. J. Microbiol., 43: 1476-1489. DOI:10.1590/S1517-83822012000400032 |
Amna, T., Puri, S., Verma, V., et al., 2006. Bioreactor studies on the endophytic fungus Entrophospora infrequens for the production of an anticancer alkaloid camptothecin. Can. J. Microbiol., 52: 189-196. DOI:10.1139/W05-122 |
Ankad, G., Upadhya, V., Pai, S.R., et al., 2015. Evaluating Nothapodytes nimmoniana population from three localities of Western Ghats using camptothecin as phytochemical marker and selection of elites using a new-content range chart method. Pharmacogn. Mag., 11: 90-95. DOI:10.4103/0973-1296.149712 |
Ao, M.Z., Wang, J., Shi, Y, et al., 2011. Camptothecin distribution and content in Nothapodytes nimmoniana. Nat. Prod. Commun., 6: 197-200. |
Bai, Y., Song, Q., 2014. HPLC analysis of camptothecin and 9-methoxycamptothecin in the roots of Nothapodytes pittosporoides. J. Pharm. Anal., 34: 100-103. DOI:10.1201/b17313-6 |
Bailly, C., 2019. Irinotecan: 25 years of cancer treatment. Pharmacol. Res., 148: 104398. DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104398 |
Bertrand, S., Bohni, N., Schnee, S., et al., 2014. Metabolite induction via microorganism co-culture: a potential way to enhance chemical diversity for drug discovery. Biotechnol. Adv., 32: 1180-1204. DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.03.001 |
Bhalkar, B.N., Bedekar, P.A., Patil, S.M., et al., 2015. Production of camptothecine using whey by an endophytic fungus: standardization using response surface methodology. RSC Adv., 5: 62828-62835. DOI:10.1039/c5ra12212k |
Bhalkar, B.N., Patil, S.M., Govindwar, S.P., 2016. Camptothecine production by mixed fermentation of two endophytic fungi from Nothapodytes nimmoniana. Fungal Biol., 120: 873-883. DOI:10.1016/j.funbio.2016.04.003 |
Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., et al., 2024. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin., 74: 229-263. DOI:10.3322/caac.21834 |
Byng, J.W., Bernardini, B., Joseph, J.A., et al., 2014. Phylogenetic relationships of Icacinaceae focusing on the vining genera. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 176: 277-294. DOI:10.1111/boj.12205 |
Cai, L., Wang, J., Li, Y., et al., 2022. Global regulatory factor VeA upregulates the production of antitumor substances in endophytic Fusarium solani. Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 115: 1085-1100. DOI:10.1007/s10482-022-01753-5 |
Chamberlain, S., Boettiger, C, 2017. R Python, and Ruby clients for GBIF species occurrence data. PeerJ PrePrints, 5: e3304v1. DOI:10.7287/peerj.preprints.3304v1 |
Chandrika, M., Rai, V.R., Thoyajaksha, 2010. ISSR marker based analysis of micropropagated plantlets of Nothapodytes foetida. Biol. Plant., 54: 561-565. DOI:10.1007/s10535-010-0100-5 |
Chen, G., Cai, X.-H., Tang, J., et al., 2024. Anticancer drugs imperil Asian tree species. Science 385, 1173. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr0965, 1173.
|
Chen, G., Sun, W., Wang, X., et al., 2019. Conserving threatened widespread species: a case study using a traditional medicinal plant in Asia. Biodivers. Conserv., 28: 213-227. DOI:10.1007/s10531-018-1648-1 |
Chen, Y., Huang, J., Wang, Y., et al., 2024. Identification and characterization of camptothecin tailoring enzymes in Nothapodytes tomentosa. J. Integr. Plant Biol., 66: 1158-1169. DOI:10.1111/jipb.13649 |
Chu, F., Chang, K., Chen, K., et al., 2014. Supercritical fluid extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes Foetida. J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 61: 778-784. DOI:10.1002/jccs.201300631 |
Chung, R.-S., Chang, E.-H., 2012. Soil microbial community structure and microbial activities in the root zone of Nothapodytes nimmoniana. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 58: 479-491. DOI:10.1080/00380768.2012.702282 |
Cragg, G.M., Pezzuto, J.M., 2016. Natural products as a vital source for the discovery of cancer chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Med. Princ. Pract., 25: 41-59. DOI:10.1159/000443404 |
Dandin, V.S., Murthy, H.N., 2012. Enhanced in vitro multiplication of Nothapodytes nimmoniana Graham using semisolid and liquid cultures and estimation of camptothecin in the regenerated plants. Acta Physiol. Plant., 34: 1381-1386. DOI:10.1007/s11738-012-0934-x |
Darshetkar, A.M., Godbole, R.C., Pable, A.A., et al., 2023. Chloroplast genome sequence of Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Icacinaceae), a vulnerable reservoir of camptothecin from Western Ghats. Gene, 883: 147674. DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2023.147674 |
Das, B., Anjani, G., Kashinatham, A., et al., 1998. Occurrence of 5-methoxy-1-oxo-tetrahydro-β-carboline in Indian Nothapodytes foetida —An important clue to the biogenetic formation of camptothecins. Nat. Prod. Lett., 11: 285-289. DOI:10.1080/10575639808044961 |
Das, B., Madhusudhan, P., 1999. Isolation, characterization and chemoenzymatic synthesis of 9-methoxy-20-(s)-mappicine, a new constituent of Nothapodytes Foetida. Nat. Prod. Lett., 14: 135-140. DOI:10.1080/10575639908041221 |
Dauby, G., Stévart, T., Droissart, V., et al., 2017. ConR: an R package to assist large-scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data. Ecol. Evol., 7: 11292-11303. DOI:10.1002/ece3.3704 |
Degambada, K.D., Peramune Arachchilage, A.S.P.K., Salim, N., et al., 2023. Cellular localisation and quantification of camptothecin in different plant parts of Nothapodytes nimmoniana (J. Graham) Mabberley of Sri Lankan origin. Phytochem. Anal., 34: 453-460. DOI:10.1002/pca.3226 |
Fulzele, D., Satdive, R., Pol, B., 2001. Growth and production of camptothecin by cell suspension cultures of Nothapodytes foetida. Planta Med., 67: 150-152. DOI:10.1055/s-2001-11519 |
Fulzele, D.P., Satdive, R.K., 2005a. Comparison of techniques for the extraction of the anti-cancer drug camptothecin from Nothapodytes foetida. J. Chromatogr., A, 1063: 9-13. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.11.020 |
Fulzele, D.P., Satdive, R.K., 2005b. Distribution of anticancer drug camptothecin in Nothapodytes foetida. Fitoterapia, 76: 643-648. DOI:10.1016/j.fitote.2005.07.005 |
Gao, M., Miller, K.D., Sledge, G.W., et al., 2005. Radiosynthesis of carbon-11-labeled camptothecin derivatives as potential positron emission tomography tracers for imaging of topoisomerase Ⅰ in cancers. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 15: 3865-3869. DOI:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.05.108 |
Gaston, K.J., Fuller, R.A., 2008. Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 23: 14-19. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.001 |
GBIF, 2025. GBIF Occurrence Download. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.rtfzap [WWW Document].
|
Gharpure, G., Chavan, B., Lele, U., et al., 2010. Camptothecin accumulation in Ophiorrhiza rugosa var. prostrata from northern western ghats. Curr. Sci., 98: 302-304. |
Godbole, R.C., Kadam, S.B., Pable, A.A., et al., 2023. Phylogenomics of transcriptionally active AP2/ERF and bHLH transcription factors and study of their promoter regions in Nothapodytes nimmoniana (J. Graham) Mabb. Genome, 66: 235-250. DOI:10.1139/gen-2023-0009 |
González-Juárez, D.E., Escobedo-Moratilla, A., Flores, J., et al., 2020. A review of the Ephedra genus: distribution, ecology, ethnobotany, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties. Molecules, 25: 3283. DOI:10.3390/molecules25143283 |
Govindachari, T.R., Viswanathan, N., 1972. Alkaloids of Mappia foetida. Phytochemistry, 11: 3529-3531. DOI:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)89852-0 |
Guo, D.-Y., Ling, T.-J., Cai, X.-H., 2015. Chemical constituents of Nothapodytes pittosporoides (Icacinaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 61: 293-296. DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.039 |
Gurudatt, P.S., Priti, V., Shweta, S., et al., 2010. Attenuation of camptothecin production and negative relation between hyphal biomass and camptothecin content in endophytic fungal strains isolated from Nothapodytes nimmoniana Grahm (Icacinaceae). Curr. Sci., 98: 1006-1010. |
Harris, J.B.C., Reid, J.L., Scheffers, B.R., et al., 2012. Conserving imperiled species: a comparison of the IUCN red list and U.S. endangered species act. Conserv. Lett., 5: 64-72. DOI:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00205.x |
Harvey, C.J.B., Tang, M., Schlecht, U., et al., 2018. HEx: a heterologous expression platform for the discovery of fungal natural products. Sci. Adv., 4: eaar5459. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aar5459 |
Hattum, H.V., Waldmann, H., 2014. Biology-oriented synthesis: harnessing the power of evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136: 11853-11859. DOI:10.1021/ja505861d |
Howard, R.A., 1942. Studies of the Icacinaceae, Ⅱ: humirianthera, Leretia, mappia and nothapodytes, valid genera of the icacineae. J. Arnold. Arbor., 23: 55-78. DOI:10.5962/bhl.part.18680 |
Hsiang, Y.H., Hertzberg, R., Hecht, S., et al., 1985. Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase Ⅰ. J. Biol. Chem., 260: 14873-14878. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9258(17)38654-4 |
Huang, F.-C., Sung, P.-H., Do, Y.-Y., et al., 2012. Differential expression and functional characterization of the NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase genes from Nothapodytes foetida. Plant Sci., 190: 16-23. DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.03.007 |
Isah, T., Umar, S., 2019. Proteome study of embryogenic competence acquisition in the callus cultures of Nothapodytes nimmoniana (J. Graham) Mabberly. Acta Physiol. Plant., 41: 96. DOI:10.1007/s11738-019-2896-8 |
Ito, Y., Yadav, S.R., Chang, Y.S., et al., 2022. Molecular species delimitation reveals underestimated diversity in the tree genus Nothapodytes (Icacinaceae). Plant Syst. Evol., 308: 3. DOI:10.1007/s00606-021-01797-6 |
Jain, S.K., Meena, S., Gupta, A.P., et al., 2014. Dysoxylum binectariferum bark as a new source of anticancer drug camptothecin: bioactivity-guided isolation and LCMS-based quantification. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 24: 3146-3149. DOI:10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.05.001 |
Jisha, K., 2006. A Study on the Production of Camptothecin from Ophiorrhiza mungos and Nothapodytes foelida Using Cell and Tissue Culture. Mahatma Gandhi University.
|
Kadam, S.B., Godbole, R.C., Pable, A.A., et al., 2023. Thidiazuron-mediated callogenesis and biosynthesis of anti-cancerous monoterpene indole alkaloid camptothecin in Nothapodytes nimmoniana (J. Graham) Mabb. callus culture. South Afr. J. Bot., 156: 411-419. DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2023.03.022 |
Kakkar, R.A., Haneen, M.A., Parida, A.C., et al., 2023. The known, unknown, and the intriguing about members of a critically endangered traditional medicinal plant genus Aconitum. Front. Plant Sci., 14: 1139215. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1139215 |
Kårehed, J., 2001. Multiple origin of the tropical forest tree family Icacinaceae. Am. J. Bot., 88: 2259-2274. DOI:10.2307/3558388 |
Karwasara, V.S., Dixit, V.K., 2013. Culture medium optimization for camptothecin production in cell suspension cultures of Nothapodytes nimmoniana (J. Grah.) Mabberley. Plant Biotechnol. Rep., 7: 357-369. DOI:10.1007/s11816-012-0270-z |
Kaur, P., Kumar, V., Singh, R., et al., 2020. Biotechnological strategies for production of camptothecin from fungal and bacterial endophytes. South Afr. J. Bot., 134: 135-145. DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2020.07.001 |
Kavitha, P.S., Vasantha Kumar, T., Rajasekharan, P.E., et al., 2010. Camptothecin and 9-methoxy camptothecin, anti-cancer alkaloids in Nothapodytes nimmoniana from Western ghats, India. JAMPS, 32: 129-132. |
Keck, F., Peller, T., Alther, R., et al., 2025. The global human impact on biodiversity. Nature: 641, 395-400. DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-08752-2 |
Keller, N.P., 2019. Fungal secondary metabolism: regulation, function and drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 17: 167-180. DOI:10.1038/s41579-018-0121-1 |
Kulkarni, A.V., Patwardhan, A.A., Lele, U., et al., 2010. Production of camptothecin in cultures of Chonemorpha grandiflora. Pharmacogn. Res., 2: 296-299. DOI:10.4103/0974-8490.72327 |
Li, J., Chen, Y., Wu, L., et al., 2023. Phytochemical analysis of Nothapodytes tomentosa and distribution and content of camptothecin and its analogues in four plants. Planta Med., 89: 1250-1258. DOI:10.1055/a-2072-2177 |
Li, J.Q., Sixuan, Z., Tingchi, W., et al., 2018. Diversity of endophytic fungi from Nothapodytes pittosporoides in Guizhou province. Mycosystema, 37: 43-51. DOI:10.13346/j.mycosystema.170118 |
Liu, Y., Yang, C., Xu, C., et al., 2022. Preparation of 9-uoroo Camptothecin Derivative and Application of 9-uoroo Camptothecin Derivative in Anti-tumor Aspect. CN113880855A.
|
Ma, Y., Chen, G., Edward Grumbine, R., et al., 2013. Conserving plant species with extremely small populations (PSESP) in China. Biodivers. Conserv., 22: 803-809. DOI:10.1007/s10531-013-0434-3 |
Manjunatha, B.L., Singh, H.R., Ravikanth, G., et al., 2016. Transcriptome analysis of stem wood of Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Graham) Mabb. identifies genes associated with biosynthesis of camptothecin, an anti-carcinogenic molecule. J. Biosci., 41: 119-131. DOI:10.1007/s12038-016-9591-3 |
Miers, J., 1852. On some genera of the Icacinaceae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 10: 108-119. DOI:10.1080/03745485609495659 |
Mohinudeen, I.A.H.K., Kanumuri, R., Soujanya, K.N., et al., 2021. Sustainable production of camptothecin from an Alternaria sp. isolated from Nothapodytes nimmoniana. Sci. Rep., 11: 1478. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-79239-5 |
Musavi, S.F., Dhavale, A., Balakrishnan, R.M., 2015. Optimization and kinetic modeling of cell-associated camptothecin production from an endophytic Fusarium oxysporum NFX06. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol., 45: 158-172. DOI:10.1080/10826068.2014.907177 |
Namdeo, A., Sharma, A., 2012. HPLC analysis of camptothecin content in various parts of Nothapodytes foetida collected on different periods. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 2: 389-393. DOI:10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60062-8 |
Namdeo, A., Sharma, A., Fulzele, D.P., et al., 2010. Influence of geographical and climatic conditions on camptothecin content of Nothapodytes nimmoniana. Record Nat. Prod., 4: 64-71. |
Natarajan, S., Pucker, B., Srivastava, S., 2023. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of camptothecin producing novel fungal endophyte: Alternaria burnsii NCIM 1409. Sci. Rep., 13: 14614. DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-41738-6 |
Newman, D.J., Cragg, G.M., 2020. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod., 83: 770-803. DOI:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285 |
Nguyen, T.-A.M., Nguyen, T.-D., Leung, Y.Y., et al., 2021. Discovering and harnessing oxidative enzymes for chemoenzymatic synthesis and diversification of anti-cancer camptothecin analogues. Commun. Chem., 4: 177. DOI:10.1038/s42004-021-00602-2 |
Padmanabha, B., Chandrashekar, M., Ramesha, B., et al., 2006. Patterns of accumulation of camptothecin, an anti-cancer alkaloid in Nothapodytes nimmoniana Graham., in the Western ghats, India: implications for identifying high-yielding sources of the alkaloid. Curr. Sci., 90: 95-100. |
Pai, S.R., Pawar, N.V., Nimbalkar, M.S., et al., 2013. Seasonal variation in content of camptothecin from the bark of Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Grah.) Mabb., using HPLC analysis. Pharmacogn. Res., 5: 219-221. DOI:10.4103/0974-8490.112434 |
Patil, D.M., Akamanchi, K.G., 2017a. Ultrasound-assisted rapid extraction and kinetic modelling of influential factors: extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant. Ultrason. Sonochem., 37: 582-591. DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.02.015 |
Patil, D.M., Akamanchi, K.G., 2017b. Microwave assisted process intensification and kinetic modelling: extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant. Ind. Crops Prod., 98: 60-67. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.01.023 |
Patil, D.M., Hunasagi, B.S., Raghu, A.V., et al., 2024. Optimisation of enzyme-assisted extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana and its characterisation. Phytochem. Anal., 35: 825-839. DOI:10.1002/pca.3331 |
Peng, H., Howard, R.A., 2008. Icacinaceae. In: Wu, C.-Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.-Y. (Eds.), Flora of China, vol. 11. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press., St. Louis, pp. 505–514.
|
Peng, X., Cai, X., Tang, J., et al., 2024. Rescuing and utilizing anticancer Nothapodytes species: integrated studies from plant resources to natural medicines. Clin. Transl. Med., 14: e70110. DOI:10.1002/ctm2.70110 |
Pirillo, A., Verotta, L., Gariboldi, P., et al., 1995. Constituents of Nothapodytes foetida. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin. Trans., 1: 583-586. |
Pironon, S., Ondo, I., Diazgranados, M., et al., 2024. The global distribution of plants used by humans. Science, 383: 293-297. DOI:10.1126/science.adg8028 |
Prakash, L., Middha, S.K., Mohanty, S.K., et al., 2016. Micropropagation and validation of genetic and biochemical fidelity among regenerants of Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Graham) Mabb. employing ISSR markers and HPLC. 3 Biotech, 6: 171. DOI:10.1007/s13205-016-0490-y |
Pu, X., Zhang, C.-R., Gao, H.-C., et al., 2020. Biosynthesis-inspired mining and identification of untapped alkaloids in Camptotheca acuminata for enzyme discovery using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-time of flight-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr., A, 1620: 461036. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461036 |
Puri, S.C., Verma, V., Amna, T., et al., 2005. An endophytic fungus from Nothapodytes foetida that produces camptothecin. J. Nat. Prod., 68: 1717-1719. DOI:10.1021/np0502802 |
Qin, H., Yang, Y., Dong, S., et al., 2017. Threatened species list of China's higher plants. Biodivers. Sci., 25: 696-744. DOI:10.17520/biods.2017144 |
Ramesha, B.T., Amna, T., Ravikanth, G., et al., 2008. Prospecting for camptothecines from Nothapodytes nimmoniana in the Western Ghats, South India: identification of high-yielding sources of camptothecin and new families of camptothecines. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 46: 362-368. DOI:10.1093/chromsci/46.4.362 |
Ramesha, B.T., Suma, H.K., Senthilkumar, U., et al., 2013. New plant sources of the anti-cancer alkaloid, camptothecine from the Icacinaceae taxa, India. Phytomedicine, 20: 521-527. DOI:10.1016/j.phymed.2012.12.003 |
Ramesha, B.T., Zuehlke, S., Vijaya, R.C., et al., 2011. Sequestration of camptothecin, an anticancer alkaloid, by Chrysomelid beetles. J. Chem. Ecol., 37: 533-536. DOI:10.1007/s10886-011-9946-z |
Rather, G.A., Sharma, A., Jeelani, S.M., et al., 2019. Metabolic and transcriptional analyses in response to potent inhibitors establish MEP pathway as major route for camptothecin biosynthesis in Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Graham) Mabb. BMC Plant Biol., 19: 301. DOI:10.1186/s12870-019-1912-x |
Rather, G.A., Sharma, A., Misra, P., et al., 2020. Molecular characterization and overexpression analyses of secologanin synthase to understand the regulation of camptothecin biosynthesis in Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Graham.) Mabb. Protoplasma, 257: 391-405. DOI:10.1007/s00709-019-01440-9 |
Rather, G.A., Sharma, A., Pandith, S.A., et al., 2018. De novo transcriptome analyses reveals putative pathway genes involved in biosynthesis and regulation of camptothecin in Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Graham) Mabb. Plant Mol. Biol., 96: 197-215. DOI:10.1007/s11103-017-0690-9 |
Redford, K.H., Berger, J., Zack, S., 2013. Abundance as a conservation value. Oryx, 47: 157-158. DOI:10.1017/S0030605313000331 |
Rehman, S., Shawl, A.S., Kour, A., et al., 2009a. Comparative studies and identification of camptothecin produced by an endophyte at shake flask and bioreactor. Nat. Prod. Res., 23: 1050-1057. DOI:10.1080/14786410902750944 |
Rehman, S., Shawl, A.S., Sultana, S., et al., 2009b. In vitro cytotoxicity of an endophytic fungus isolated from Nothapodytes foetida. Ann. Microbiol., 59: 157-161. DOI:10.1007/BF03175614 |
Rehman, S., Shawl, A.S., Verma, V., et al., 2008. An endophytic Neurospora sp. from Nothapodytes foetida producing camptothecin. Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol., 44: 225-231. |
Roja, G., 2006. Comparative studies on the camptothecin content from Nothapodytes foetida and Ophiorrhiza species. Nat. Prod. Res., 20: 85-88. DOI:10.1080/15216540500092898 |
Roja, G., Heble, M.R., 1994. The quinoline alkaloids camptothecin and 9-methoxycamptothecin from tissue cultures and mature trees of Nothapodytes foetida. Phytochemistry, 36: 65-66. DOI:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97013-4 |
Sadre, R., Magallanes-Lundback, M., Pradhan, S., et al., 2016. Metabolite diversity in alkaloid biosynthesis: a multilane (diastereomer) highway for camptothecin synthesis in Camptotheca acuminata. Plant Cell, 28: 1926-1944. DOI:10.1105/tpc.16.00193 |
Sajitha, T.P., Manjunatha, B.L., Siva, R., et al., 2018. Mechanism of resistance to Camptothecin, a cytotoxic plant secondary metabolite, by Lymantria sp. larvae. J. Chem. Ecol., 44: 611-620. DOI:10.1007/s10886-018-0960-2 |
Salim, V., Jones, A.D., DellaPenna, D., 2018. Camptotheca acuminata 10-hydroxycamptothecin O-methyltransferase: an alkaloid biosynthetic enzyme co-opted from flavonoid metabolism. Plant J., 95: 112-125. DOI:10.1111/tpj.13936 |
Samaga, P.V., Rai, V.R., Rai, K.M.L., 2014. Bionectria ochroleuca NOTL33—an endophytic fungus from Nothapodytes foetida producing antimicrobial and free radical scavenging metabolites. Ann. Microbiol., 64: 275-285. DOI:10.1007/s13213-013-0661-6 |
Satheeshkumar, K., Seeni, S., 2000. In vitro multiplication of Nothapodites foetida (Wight.) Sleumer through seedling explant cultures. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 38: 273-277. |
Sharma, M.V., Uma Shaanker, R., Leather, S.R., et al., 2011. Floral resources, pollinators and fruiting in a threatened tropical deciduous tree. J. Plant Ecol., 4: 259-267. DOI:10.1093/jpe/rtq029 |
Shen, S., Ding, H., Tan, Y., 2024. Nothapodytes burmanica (Icacinaceae), a new species from Kachin state, Myanmar. Nord. J. Bot., 2024: e04215. DOI:10.1111/njb.04215 |
Shivaprakash, K.N., Ramesha, B.T., Uma, R., et al., 2014. Genetic structure, diversity and long term viability of a medicinal plant, Nothapodytes nimmoniana Graham. (Icacinaceae), in protected and non- protected areas in the Western ghats biodiversity hotspot. PLoS One, 9: e112769. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0112769 |
Shweta, S., Gurumurthy, B.R., Vasanthakumari, M.M., et al., 2015. Endophyte fungal diversity in Nothapodytes nimmoniana along its distributional gradient in the Western ghats, India: are camptothecine (anticancer alkaloid) producing endophytes restricted to specific clades?. Curr. Sci., 109: 127-138. |
Shweta, S., Shivanna, M.B., Gurumurthy, B.R., et al., 2014. Inhibition of fungal endophytes by camptothecine produced by their host plant, Nothapodytes nimmoniana (Grahm) Mabb. (Icacinaceae). Curr. Sci., 107: 994-1000. |
Singh, I., Kumaravadivel, N., Gnanam, R., et al., 2010. RP-HPLC analysis for camptothecin content in Nothapodytes nimmoniana, an endangered medicinal plant. J. Med. Plant Res., 4: 255-259. DOI:10.5897/JMPR.9001096 |
Sirikantaramas, S., Meeprasert, A., Rungrotmongkol, T., et al., 2015. Structural insight of DNA topoisomerases Ⅰ from camptothecin-producing plants revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. Phytochemistry, 113: 50-56. DOI:10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.02.012 |
Sirikantaramas, S., Yamazaki, M., Saito, K., 2008. Mutations in topoisomerase Ⅰ as a self-resistance mechanism coevolved with the production of the anticancer alkaloid camptothecin in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105: 6782-6786. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0801038105 |
Sleumer, H., 1969. Materials Towards the Knowledge of the Icacinaceae of Asia. Blumea, vol. 17, pp. 181–264.
|
Sleumer, H., 1940. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Icacinaceen und Peripterygiaceen. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem., 15: 228. DOI:10.2307/3995114 |
Spielman, D., Brook, B.W., Frankham, R., 2004. Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101: 15261-15264. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0403809101 |
Srinivas, K.V.N.S., Das, B., 2003. 9-Methoxy-20-O-acetylcamptothecin, a minor new alkaloid from Nothapodites foetida. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 31: 85-87. DOI:10.1016/S0305-1978(02)00077-7 |
Stull, G.W., Duno De Stefano, R., Soltis, D.E., et al., 2015. Resolving basal lamiid phylogeny and the circumscription of Icacinaceae with a plastome-scale data set. Am. J. Bot., 102: 1794-1813. DOI:10.3732/ajb.1500298 |
Suhas, S., Ramesha, B.T., Ravikanth, G., et al., 2007. Chemical profiling of Nothapodytes nimmoniana populations in the Western ghats, India for anti-cancer compound, camptothecin. Curr. Sci., 92: 1142-1147. |
Sun, W., Ma, Y., Corlett, R.T., 2024. Plant species with extremely small populations conservation program: achieving Kunming–Montreal global biodiversity targets. Trends. Plant Sci., 29: 827-830. DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2024.05.007 |
Susanna, D., Balakrishnan, R.M., Ponnan Ettiyappan, J., 2022. Comprehensive insight into the extract optimization, phytochemical profiling, and biological evaluation of the medicinal plant Nothapodytes foetida. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 42: 102365. DOI:10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102365 |
Thakur, A., Kanwal, K.S., 2024. Assessing the global distribution and conservation status of the Taxus genus: an overview. Trees For. People, 15: 100501. DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100501 |
Thakur, M., Schättin, E.W., McShea, W.J., 2018. Globally common, locally rare: revisiting disregarded genetic diversity for conservation planning of widespread species. Biodivers. Conserv., 27: 3031-3035. DOI:10.1007/s10531-018-1579-x |
Thengane, S.R., Kulkarni, D.K., Shrikhande, V.A., et al., 2003. Influence of medium composition on callus induction and camptothecin(s) accumulation in Nothapodytes foetida. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 72: 247-251. DOI:10.1023/A:1022392929406 |
Upadhya, V., Pai, S.R., Sharma, A.K., et al., 2014. Compound specific extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana and piperine from Piper nigrum using accelerated solvent extractor. J. Anal. Methods Chem., 2014: 1-6. DOI:10.1155/2014/932036 |
Wahby, S., Fashoyin-Aje, L., Osgood, C.L., et al., 2021. FDA approval summary: accelerated approval of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy for third-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 27: 1850-1854. DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3119 |
Wall, M.E., Wani, M.C., Cook, C.E., et al., 1966. Plant antitumor agents Ⅰ. The isolation and structure of camptothecin, a novel alkaloidal leukemia and tumor inhibitor from Camptotheca acuminata. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88: 3888-3890. DOI:10.1021/ja00968a057 |
Wang, C.-J., Wan, J.-Z., Mu, X.-Y., et al., 2015. Management planning for endangered plant species in priority protected areas. Biodivers. Conserv., 24: 2383-2397. DOI:10.1007/s10531-015-0928-2 |
Wang, H., Ao, M., Wu, J., et al., 2013. TNFα and Fas/FasL pathways are involved in 9-Methoxycamptothecin-induced apoptosis in cancer cells with oxidative stress and G2/M cell cycle arrest. Food Chem. Toxicol., 55: 396-410. DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2012.12.059 |
Wender, P.A., Verma, V.A., Paxton, T.J., et al., 2008. Function-oriented synthesis, step economy, and drug design. Acc. Chem. Res., 41: 40-49. DOI:10.1021/ar700155p |
Wu, S.F., Hsieh, P., Wu, C., et al., 2008. Camptothecinoids from the seeds of Taiwanese Nothapodytes foetida. Molecules, 13: 1361-1371. DOI:10.3390/molecules13061361 |
Wu, T.S., Chan, Y., Leu, Y., et al., 1996. Nothapodytines A and B from Nothapodytes foetida. Phytochemistry, 42: 907-908. DOI:10.1016/0031-9422(95)00962-0 |
Wu, T.S., Leu, T., Hsu, H., et al., 1995. Constituents and cytotoxic principles of Nothapodytes foetida. Phytochemistry, 39: 383-385. DOI:10.1016/0031-9422(94)00901-5 |
Xiong, X., Gou, J., Liao, Q., et al., 2021. The Taxus genome provides insights into paclitaxel biosynthesis. Nat. Plants, 7: 1026-1036. DOI:10.1038/s41477-021-00963-5 |
Yang, J., Cai, L., Liu, D., et al., 2020. China's conservation program on plant species with extremely small populations (PSESP): progress and perspectives. Biol. Conserv., 244: 108535. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108535 |
Yukimune, Y., Tabata, H., Higashi, Y., et al., 1996. Methyl jasmonate-induced overproduction of paclitaxel and baccatin Ⅲ in Taxus cell suspension cultures. Nat. Biotechnol., 14: 1129-1132. DOI:10.1038/nbt0996-1129 |
Zhang, X., Ang, E.C.X., Yang, Z., et al., 2022. Synthesis of chiral sulfinate esters by asymmetric condensation. Nature, 604: 298-303. DOI:10.1038/s41586-022-04524-4 |
Zhang, Y., Feng, L., Hemu, X., et al., 2024. OSMAC strategy: a promising way to explore microbial cyclic peptides. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 268: 116175. DOI:10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116175 |
Zhou, B.N., Hoch, J.M., Johnson, R.K., et al., 2000. Use of COMPARE analysis to discover new natural product drugs: isolation of camptothecin and 9-methoxycamptothecin from a new source. J. Nat. Prod., 63: 1273-1276. DOI:10.1021/np000058r |
Zhou, S., Qiao, L., Jayawardena, R.S., et al., 2019. Two new endophytic Colletotrichum species from Nothapodytes pittosporoides in China. MycoKeys, 49: 1-14. DOI:10.3897/mycokeys.49.31904 |
Zhou, S.-X., Qiao, L.-J., Kang, J.-C., et al., 2017. A new species of Monilochaetes from Nothapodytes pittosporoides. Phytotaxa, 326: 129. DOI:10.11646/phytotaxa.326.2.4 |
Zhou, Y., Yan, B., Yang, Q., et al., 2022. Harnessing natural products by a pharmacophore-oriented semisynthesis approach for the discovery of potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 61: e202201684. DOI:10.1002/anie.202201684 |
Zizka, A., Silvestro, D., Andermann, T., et al., 2019. CoordinateCleaner : standardized cleaning of occurrence records from biological collection databases. Methods Ecol. Evol., 10: 744-751. DOI:10.1111/2041-210X.13152 |



