2. Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
3. Kunming College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
4. Kunming Botanical Garden, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
5. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada
Primula chungensis I.B. Balfour & Kingdon-Ward is a herbaceous, insect-pollinated, perennial species belonging to sect. Prolifera (Primulaceae) and restricted to the mountainous regions of Yunnan, Sichuan and Tibet of China (Hu and Kelso, 1996; Richards, 2002). It commonly occurs in wet meadows, forest edges, open slopes, and roadsides at altitudes between 2, 900 and 3, 200m. The species flowers from May to June and produces one to three inflorescences composed of pale orange flowers (about 20 flowers per inflorescence) that last for up to 6 days. Our field investigations indicate that P.chungensis exhibits considerable variation in floral biology across its geographical range. Most populations are composed of a single self-pollinating floral phenotype with anthers and stigmas at equivalent height (homostyly). In contrast, other populations contain outcrossing long-styled and short-styled floral morphs typical of the floral polymorphism distyly. Populations containing both homostylous and heterostylous morphs also occur, and finally some populations are monomorphic for heterostylous morphs, especially the long-styled morph.
Primula is a well-known model system for studies of the evolution, function and breakdown of heterostyly (Crosby, 1949; Ornduff, 1979; Piper et al., 1984; Richards, 2002; Mast and Conti, 2006; Mast et al., 2006; Vos et al., 2014; Keller et al., 2014), and more recently for investigations of the molecular genetics of the heterostyly linkage group (McCubbin et al., 2006; Li et al., 2011; Nowak et al., 2015). The occurrence of polymorphism for floral morphology and mating system in P.chungensis provides outstanding opportunities for investigating a range of questions associated with the evolutionary maintenance and breakdown of hetero-styly. Development of genetic markers to investigate the patterns of genetic diversity in populations of contrasting mating systems (outcrossing vs. selfing), and to determine the evolutionary relationships between populations containing different floral phenotypes is a necessary first step for evolutionary studies of P.chungensis. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of 24 polymorphic microsatellite markers from P.chungensis, which will be valuable for furthering our underst and ing of the evolutionary genetics of this species.
1. Materials and methodsWe isolated total genomic DNA from leaf tissue of one P.chungensis individual from the Muli population (28°54.604′N, 100°47.268′E; 3, 489m a.s.l.) in Sichuan using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Irvine, USA) following the manufacturer′s protocol. Extracted DNA was used for a library preparation with a Nextera XT Library Prep Kit for Illumina. We performed sequencing on the MiSeq Benchtop sequencer (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, California, USA) using the 2 × 250bp read length. Raw Illumina reads (679, 708 reads) were analyzed and assembled using Geneious version 6.0 (Biomatters, Auckl and , New Zeal and ) into 56, 092 contigs. The contigs were BLASTed against NCBI GenBank using BLASTx to identify and exclude contigs with chloroplast genome hits. Microsatellites with at least 5 repeats were then detected using QDD version 2.1 Beta (Meglécz et al., 2010). A total of 2, 341 contigs contained at least one microsatellite, of which 127 loci were selected for primer design using the software PRIMER version 5.0 (Clarke and Gorley, 2001). These primers were initially tested and optimized using a Veriti 96-well Thermal Cycler Gradient PCR Machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). A total of 24 primer pairs amplified consistently, and were used for further screening (Table 1). We assessed polymorphism at these loci on 24 individuals obtained from a distylous population located in southern Tibet (29°46.616′N, 94°44.545′E; 3, 305m a.s.l.).
Locus name | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Repeat motif | Size/bp | Ta/℃ | GenBank accession no. |
PC109 | F: ACGGGTCATTGCGTTTAAGTCG R: TTGTCGTTTGTCGGAGTGTTCG | (CGA) 5 | 190 | 54 | KT033877 |
PC4007 | F: ATGGTGCTAAACGCCTTGTG R: TTTGAAGTAGGGGTGAGGTG | (CT) 10 | 308 | 54 | KT033878 |
PC4198 | F: CTACACCTCTCCTCCTCTTC R: CCCTAGCCGTCCAACTTA | (TC) 9 | 153 | 56 | KT033879 |
PC9123 | F: CAAAAGAGCGTTAGGAGTGA R: GATGGTTGTCGTTGTCGGT | (TG) 7 | 338 | 48 | KT033880 |
PC11592 | F: TACCCTAACCTATTTTTCCC R: CGCTACCTTACCTCTCTTCT | (AG) 15 | 165 | 56 | KT033881 |
PC14297 | F: ACTTACTGGTCTTTCGGTGA R: CTCTCGCTTTATGTGCCTG | (AG) 16 | 246 | 52 | KT033882 |
PC15519 | F: ACTCGTGTTCCGTTTGTTCTAA R: AGTAACTGTTTGTTTGGCTATTGA | (GTTTT) 8 | 240 | 50 | KT033883 |
PC15877 | F: CGGTTTATTTGGTTGAAGTC R: CTCCTTGTTCTTTGTTTGAC | (CT) 6 | 228 | 50 | KT033884 |
PC20540 | F: CTCATCGTCTTTCCTATTTC R: AAGGCAATCTGTTCTGAC | (TTTTTG) 5 | 213 | 48 | KT033885 |
PC21731 | F: ATGTGTCCTTGTTTTATGTG R: ATGGTGTTTATCAATGTAGG | (GA) 6 | 173 | 48 | KT033886 |
PC29976 | F: CAATGATTTCTCTCTCGTCC R: AGATGGTTGAAGATGGTGAT | (TC) 6 | 184 | 50 | KT033887 |
PC30591 | F: GGAAATCGCAGCCTCATAAC R: GAGAGCGGAGTGTTCACCTA | (TG) 7 | 220 | 52 | KT033888 |
PC30882 | F: GCACAAACCCTAACTAAAGT R: GCACAATCAAGCCAATG | (AG) 8 | 245 | 48 | KT033889 |
PC32026 | F: CTTTTCACCAGACGCTACCC R: GCGGAACATCATTGAACCA | (CT) 6 | 221 | 56 | KT033890 |
Locus name | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Repeat motif | Size/bp | Ta/℃ | GenBank accession no. |
PC33802 | F: ACTAAACATAACAAGCATCG R: CAACTGTAATCTGAGCCAAT | (AG) 9 | 134 | 52 | KT033891 |
PC33837 | F: GTAGACACCTTGAATCATAACAAGTAAC R: TTGAAACCAAATTGCCACCT | (GAT) 5 | 266 | 52 | KT033892 |
PC34870 | F: AATCAGCATAGGGTTCTCAA R: CCTCTCTTCTCCTCCCTTTC | (AG) 8 | 113 | 52 | KT033893 |
PC37139 | F: GATGGCTCTCGTTTTTTTAC R: TCAGAGTAGAACCACATCAG | (TC) 6 | 126 | 50 | KT033894 |
PC39361 | F: GCATTCCACGTCTTTTGTTG R: GGTAATCCCCTCGCATGACT | (TG) 7 | 134 | 52 | KT033895 |
PC39450 | F: CGTGGCAATTTCTCGTAG R: ATGGCATTTGTCCTGTCTT | (AAGA) 9 | 177 | 52 | KT033896 |
PC46911 | F: GCAAAAGAAACTCCCGCAAT R: CTAAGCACAATGTTGAGGCA | (AG) 8 | 255 | 52 | KT033897 |
PC47381 | F: GAGGGAGACCGAAAGAGGA R: GCGGTAGGCACAGGAGAGTA | (CTC) 7 | 189 | 54 | KT033898 |
PC50689 | F: GGGTTTTTGTTCATCTTAGC R: TCTTCGGTATGTGTCTCGTG | (AAC) 10 | 183 | 48 | KT033899 |
PC52377 | F: TCTCTCTCTTTTCTTTGTTC R: TAGAGGAAATGGAGGAAG | (TC) 9 | 111 | 48 | KT033900 |
Note: Ta=annealing temperature. |
We performed PCR amplification using the following protocol: 20μL reaction volume containing 25 to 50ng of genomic DNA, 0.6μmol·L-1 of each primer, 10μL 2 × Taq PCR MasterMix [Tiangen (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) ; 3mmol·L-1 MgCl2, 100mmol·L-1 KCl, 0.5mmol·L-1 of each dNTP, 20mmol·L-1 Tris-HCl (PH 8.3), 0.1U Taq polymerase] and 10 × PCR buffer. We conducted PCR amplifications under the following conditions: 95℃ for 4min followed by 30 to 35 cycles at 94℃ for 45s, at the annealing temperature for each specific primer (optimized for each locus; Table 1) for 45s, 72℃ for 1.5min for extension, and a final extension step at 72℃ for 10min. PCR products were separated and visualized using a QIAxcel capillary gel electrophoresis system (QIAGEN, Irvine, USA) with an internal 10-300bp size st and ard.
2. Results and discussionOf 127 primer pairs tested, 24 primer pairs amplified microsatellite loci displaying polymorphism, whereas the remaining 103 pairs were monomorphic. All sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). We calculated basic population genetic parameters of diversity, including the number of alleles (Na), observed and expected heterozygosities (H0, HE), Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage dise-quilibrium (LD) between pairs of loci using the package GENEPOP version 4.0 (Raymond and Rousset, 1995). The number of alleles per locus (Na) ranged from 2 to 4, with a mean of 2.458. In the population investigated, the observed (H0) and expected (HE) heterozygosities ranged from 0 to 1.000 and from 0.219 to 0.708, with averages of 0.516 and 0.469, respectively (Table 2). Nine loci (PC9123, PC11592, PC20540, PC30882, PC33837, PC37139, PC39361, PC47381, PC50689; see Table 2) deviated significantly from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium indicating the possibility of null alleles, the Wahlund effect and disassortative mating in this distylous population. After Bonferroni correction, no significant pairwise linkage disequilibrium was observed for any pair of loci.
Locus | Na | HO | HE | Locus | Na | HO | HE |
PC109 | 2 | 0.667 | 0.444 | PC30882* | 2 | 0.111 | 0.494 |
PC4007 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.219 | PC32026 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.219 |
PC4198 | 2 | 0.333 | 0.278 | PC33802 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.375 |
PC9123* | 2 | 0.917 | 0.497 | PC33837* | 2 | 0.000 | 0.444 |
PC11592* | 2 | 0.750 | 0.469 | PC34870 | 3 | 0.875 | 0.539 |
PC14297 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.219 | PC37139* | 2 | 0.000 | 0.500 |
PC15519 | 4 | 1.000 | 0.653 | PC39361* | 3 | 0.833 | 0.559 |
PC15877 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.611 | PC39450 | 4 | 0.833 | 0.708 |
PC20540* | 2 | 0.000 | 0.500 | PC46911 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.531 |
PC21731 | 3 | 0.792 | 0.598 | PC47381* | 2 | 0.000 | 0.375 |
PC29976 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.625 | PC50689* | 2 | 0.000 | 0.500 |
PC30591 | 3 | 0.778 | 0.512 | PC52377 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.375 |
Note: Na=the number of allele; HO=observed heterozygosity; HE=expected heterozygosity; Geographic coordinate of the population: 29°46.616′N, 94°44.545′E. * indicates significant departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.01). |
In this study, we isolated 2, 341 microsatellite loci from P.chungensis. Primer pairs were designed to test 127 of these loci for polymorphism in 24 individual plants from a distylous population. Among the loci we tested, 24 microsatellite markers were polymorphic. These 24 polymorphic microsatellite markers will be powerful molecular tools for analyzing population structure and mating systems of P.chungensis, particularly the evolutionary relationship between distylous and homostylous populations. The high discriminatory power of these microsatellite loci will also be useful for parentage analysis in floral polymorphic populations of this species, which may provide an opportunity to evaluate the potential influence of ecological and reproductive factors on mating patterns (Zhou et al., 2015).
AcknowledgmentsThis research was funded by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB954100), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academic of Sciences (KJZD-EW-L07), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200289, 31570384), and the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (2012FB182). We appreciate the help of Zhibin Tao, Minlu Liu, Mingying Zhang and Yanhui Zhao (all at the Kunming Institute of Botany, KIB) during fieldwork. Junbo Yang and Zhirong Zhang provided technical assistance in the lab work and data analysis. Laboratory work was performed at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
[1] | Clarke, K.R., Gorley, R.N., 2001. Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth, 91. |
[2] | Crosby, J.L., 1949. Selection of an unfavorable gene-complex. Evolution, 3, 212-230. |
[3] | de Vos, J.M., Hughes, C.E., Schneeweiss, G.M., et al., 2014. Heterostyly accelerates diversification via reduced extinction in primroses. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci, 281, 20140075. |
[4] | Hu CM, Kelso S, 1996. Primulaceae. Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H. (eds.), Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 15, 39-189. |
[5] | Keller, B., Thomson, J.D., Conti, E., 2014. Heterostyly promotes disassortative pollination and reduces sexual interference in Darwin′s primroses: evidence from experimental studies. Funct. Ecol, 28, 1413-1425. |
[6] | Li, J., Webster, M.A., Smith, M.C., et al., 2011. Floral heteromorphy in Primula vulgaris: progress towards isolation and characterization of the S locus. Ann. Bot, 108, 715-726. |
[7] | Mast, A.R., Conti, E., 2006. The primrose path to heterostyly. New Phytol, 171, 439-442. |
[8] | Mast, A.R., Kelso, S., Conti, E., 2006. Are any primroses (Primula) primitively monomorphic? New Phytol, 171, 605-616. |
[9] | McCubbin, A.G., Lee, C., Hetrick, A., 2006. Identification of genes showing differential expression between morphs in developing flowers of Primula vulgaris. Sex. Plant Reprod, 19, 63-72. |
[10] | Meglécz, E., Costedoat, C., Dubut, V., et al., 2010. QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics, 26, 403-404. |
[11] | Nowak, M.D., Russo, G., Schlapbach, R., et al., 2015. The draft genome of Primula veris yields insights into the molecular basis of heterostyly. Genome Biol, 16, 12. |
[12] | Ornduff, R., 1979. Pollen flow in a population of Primula vulgaris Huds. Bot. J. Linn. Soc, 78, 1-10. |
[13] | Piper, J.G., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., 1984. A high rate of self-fertilization and increased seed fertility of homostyle primroses. Nature, 310, 50-51. |
[14] | Raymond, M., Rousset, F., 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered, 86, 248-249. |
[15] | Richards, A.J., 2002. Primula, 2nd ed. London: Batsford. |
[16] | Zhou, W., Barrett, S.C.H., Wang, H., et al., 2015. Reciprocal herkogamy promotes disassortative mating in a distylous species with intramorph compatibility. New Phytol, 206, 1503-1512. |